Chemotherapy with gemcitabine-containing regimens for locally recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Gemcitabine Combined with Cisplatin Has a Better Effect in the Treatment of Recurrent/Metastatic Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Objective

To explore the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) combined with cisplatin (DDP) in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

A total of 100 patients with recurrent/metastatic NPC treated in the First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China from January 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Based on different chemotherapy schemes, they were assigned to an observation (Obs) group (DDP + GEM, n = 55) and a control (Con) group [DDP + FU (fluorouracil), n = 45]. The two groups were compared regarding the following items: therapeutic efficacy; serum levels of platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), soluble epithelial cadherin (SE-CAD), and inflammation-related factors before and after treatment; toxic and side effects; 1-year survival rate; and quality of life (QOL) 6 months after treatment.

Results

The Obs group outperformed the Con group in therapeutic efficacy (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the levels of PDGF-BB, SE-CAD, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). After treatment, better improvements in PDGF-BB, SE-CAD and inflammatory factors were observed in the Obs group (P < 0.05). The toxic and side effects were significantly lower and the 1-year survival rate and patients' QOL after 6 months of treatment were significantly higher in the Obs group compared with the Con group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

GEM combined with DDP can provide more clinical benefits for patients with recurrent/metastatic advanced NPC, with less side effects, high tolerance and significant efficacy, which can be further promoted in clinical use.

An Exploratory Study of Refining TNM-8 M1 Categories and Prognostic Subgroups Using Plasma EBV DNA for Previously Untreated De Novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

(1) Background: NPC patients with de novo distant metastasis appears to be a heterogeneous group who demonstrate a wide range of survival, as suggested by growing evidence. Nevertheless, the current 8th edition of TNM staging (TNM-8) grouping all these patients into the M1 category is not able to identify their survival differences. We sought to identify any anatomic and non-anatomic subgroups in this study. (2) Methods: Sixty-nine patients with treatment-naive de novo M1 NPC (training cohort) were prospectively recruited from 2007 to 2018. We performed univariable and multivariable analyses (UVA and MVA) to explore anatomic distant metastasis factors, which were significantly prognostic of overall survival (OS). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) with the incorporation of significant factors from MVA was then performed to derive a new set of RPA stage groups with OS segregation (Set 1 Anatomic-RPA stage groups); another run of MVA was performed with the addition of pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA. A second-round RPA with significant prognostic factors of OS identified in this round of MVA was performed again to derive another set of stage groups (Set 2 Prognostic-RPA stage groups). Both sets were then validated externally with an independent validation cohort of 67 patients with distant relapses of their initially non-metastatic NPC (rM1) after radical treatment. The performance of models in survival segregation was evaluated by the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and concordance index (C-index) under 1000 bootstrapping samples for the validation cohort; (3) Results: The 3-year OS and median follow-up in the training cohort were 36.0% and 17.8 months, respectively. Co-existence of liver-bone metastases was the only significant prognostic factor of OS in the first round UVA and MVA. Set 1 RPA based on anatomic factors that subdivide the M1 category into two groups: M1a (absence of co-existing liver-bone metastases; median OS 28.1 months) and M1b (co-existing liver-bone metastases; median OS 19.2 months, p = 0.023). When pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA was also added, it became the only significant prognostic factor in UVA (p = 0.001) and MVA (p = 0.015), while co-existing liver-bone metastases was only significant in UVA. Set 2 RPA with the incorporation of pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA yielded good segregation (M1a: EBV DNA ≤ 2500 copies/mL and M1b: EBV DNA > 2500 copies/mL; median OS 44.2 and 19.7 months, respectively, p < 0.001). Set 2 Prognostic-RPA groups (AIC: 228.1 [95% CI: 194.8−251.8] is superior to Set 1 Anatomic-RPA groups (AIC: 278.5 [254.6−301.2]) in the OS prediction (p < 0.001). Set 2 RPA groups (C-index 0.59 [95% CI: 0.54−0.67]) also performed better prediction agreement in the validation cohort (vs. Set 1: C-index 0.47 [95% CI: 0.41−0.53]) (p < 0.001); (4) Conclusions: Our Anatomic-RPA stage groups yielded good segregation for de novo M1 NPC, and prognostication was further improved by incorporating plasma EBV DNA. These new RPA stage groups for M1 NPC can be applied to countries/regions regardless of whether reliable and sensitive plasma EBV DNA assays are available or not.

Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Final Overall Survival Analysis of GEM20110714 Phase III Study

GEM20110714 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01528618), the first randomized, phase III study of systemic chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), reported significant progression-free survival improvement with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.68; P < .001). Data from the final analysis of overall survival (OS) are presented here.

A summary of the article: "A new benchmark: the GEM20110714 study reported long-term OS improvement with gemcitabine/ cisplatin in RM-NPC."

Gemcitabine and APG-1252, a novel small molecule inhibitor of BCL-2/BCL-XL, display a synergistic antitumor effect in nasopharyngeal carcinoma through the JAK-2/STAT3/MCL-1 signaling pathway

Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has a poor prognosis, with an unfavorable response to palliative chemotherapy. Unfortunately, there are few effective therapeutic regimens. Therefore, we require novel treatment strategies with enhanced efficacy. The present study aimed to investigate the antitumor efficacy of APG-1252-M1, a dual inhibitor of BCL-2/BCL-XL, as a single agent and combined with gemcitabine. We applied various apoptotic assays and used subcutaneous transplanted NPC model to assess the in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity. Moreover, phospho-tyrosine kinase array was used to investigate the combined therapy’s potential synergistic mechanism. In addition, further validation was performed using immunohistochemistry and western blotting. In vitro, we observed that APG-1252-M1 had moderate antitumor activity toward NPC cells; however, it markedly improved gemcitabine’s ability to promote NPC cell apoptosis and suppress invasion, migration, and proliferation. Specifically, APG-1252 plus gemcitabine exhibited even remarkable antitumor activity in vivo. Mechanistically, the drug combination synergistically suppressed NPC by activating caspase-dependent pathways, blocking the phospho (p)-JAK-2/STAT3/MCL-1 signaling pathway, and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In conclusion, the results indicated that the combination of APG-1252 and gemcitabine has synergistic anticancer activities against NPC, providing a promising treatment modality for patients with NPC.

The safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP)-based induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP)-based induction chemotherapy (IC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant failure-free survival (DMFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. When GP-based IC was compared with double-drug-based or triple-drug-based IC, there were no significant differences in OS (HR 0.64, P = 0.08), PFS (HR 0.71, P = 0.09), DMFS (HR 0.87, P = 0.49) or LRFFS (HR 0.88, P = 0.66). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that GP IC led to an improvement in OS compared with triple-drug-based IC (P < 0.0001). Regarding safety, compared to triple-drug-based IC, GP-based IC was related to a decreased risk of leucopenia (P = 0.007) and neutropenia (P = 0.02) but was associated with an increased risk of thrombocytopenia (P = 0.01). Compared to double-drug-based IC, the prevalence of grade 3 or above thrombocytopenia was higher in the GP group (P = 0.007). No significant difference in the incidence of other AEs was observed.

CONCLUSION

Based on efficacy and safety, our meta-analysis demonstrated that, compared to double-drug-based or triple-drug-based IC, IC with a GP regimen does not appear to improve OS, PFS, DMFS or LRFFS and mainly led to an increased risk of grade3/4 thrombocytopenia. Notably, our subgroup analysis data show that GP-based IC may bring improved trends in OS as compared to triple-drug-based IC. For the optimal IC regimen has not been established, which IC regimen will benefit most LA-NPC patients should be further explored.

Hepatic artery infusion pump for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with liver metastasis

To evaluate the benefits and risks of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) gemcitabine and floxuridine (FUDR) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma liver metastases. HAI catheter systems were implanted under the guide of digital subtract angiography (DSA) in 16 patients with unresectable nasopharyngeal carcinoma liver metastases. HAI gemcitabine and FUDR in combination with radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy were delivered. Disease control rate (DCR) of intrahepatic lesions is 100%, objective response rate (ORR) of intrahepatic lesions is 87.5%, including 4 patients (25%) with complete response (CR), 10 patients (62.5%) with partial response (PR) and 2 patients (12.5%) with stable disease (SD). The median overall survival (mOS) was 30 months. There was no significant difference between patients with < 9 intrahepatic lesions and patients with ≥ 9 intrahepatic lesions (31 months vs. 24 months, P = 0.562). Patients without extrahepatic metastases has longer survival than patients with extrahepatic metastases (31 months vs. 17 months, P = 0.005). In all 72 cycles of HAI, the main grade 3/4 toxicities related to HAI include: leukopenia occur in 8 cycles (11.1%), thrombocytopenia in 5 cycles (6.9%), AST/ALT elevation in 12 cycles (16.7). Catheter related complications occurred in 2 patients (12.5%). HAI gemcitabine and FUDR is effective to improve DCR of intrahepatic lesions and prolong mOS for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma liver metastases, and is associated with a relative low rate of toxicity.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in the first-line setting for Chinese patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

A randomized phase III trial demonstrated that gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival compared with fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The cost-effectiveness analysis was designed to identify the economic option for metastatic NPC from a Chinese societal perspective.

METHODS

We established a Markov model that involved three health states representing the stages of disease to simulate therapy. Survival data of clinical outcomes were derived from the trial and adjusted to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Transition probabilities and health utilities were obtained from the clinical trial and published literatures. The cost-effective strategy was estimated for these treatments using a willing-to-pay (WTP) threshold. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to study the influences of parameters.

RESULTS

GP treatment group produced a gain of 0.37 QALYs with an incremental cost of $2520.80, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $6812.97 per QALY, compared with FP treatment ($15,530.96 versus $13,010.16). The ICER was lower than the accepted WTP threshold, which was 3 times gross domestic product per capita of China ($25,749 per QALY).

CONCLUSION

GP regimen is more cost-effective compared with FP regimen as the first-line treatment for Chinese patients with metastatic NPC.

Palliative chemotherapy in carcinoma nasopharynx

Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare malignancy. We conducted an audit of systemic therapies received in palliative setting in carcinoma nasopharynx and studied their outcomes.

Methods

Patients who underwent first-line palliative systemic chemotherapy between January 2014 and April 2017 for carcinoma nasopharynx at the department of medical oncology at authors' institute were selected for this analysis. Toxicities, responses, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. In addition, a Quality-Adjusted Time without Symptoms or Toxicity analysis with threshold utility analysis was performed.

Results

Fifty-one patients were included in this analysis. The indication of palliative chemotherapy was locoregionally recurrent disease in 25 (49.0%) patients and metastatic disease in 26 (51.0%) patients. The overall response rate was 62.0% (n = 33). The median PFS was 225 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 164-274 days) and median OS was 513 days (95% CI: 286-931 days). The restricted mean TOX state duration was 2.6 days (95% CI: 0.3-4.9), restricted mean TWiST duration was 219.2 days (95% CI: 184.0-254.4), and restricted mean REL duration was 74.3 days (95% CI: 38.1-110.4).

Conclusion

Systemic cytotoxic therapy in nasopharyngeal cancers is associated with high response rates and clinically meaningful PFS; with low duration of time spent in adverse events.

Management of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current perspectives

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare disease in Western countries. Nevertheless, its incidence in China, Singapore, and other Eastern countries reaches 20 cases per 100,000 people. Being an extremely chemo- and radiosensitive disease, upfront treatment often consists in the association of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin. Unfortunately, about 20% of the patients suffer from a radioresistant disease which recurs after upfront therapy. For these patients, mainly available therapeutic options consist in systemic therapy, in particular poly-chemotherapy. In those showing a single locoregional recurrence, chemotherapy is not considered to be the preferred approach and other different strategies may be employed. Re-irradiation and surgery are strategies that are always used more often, albeit related to high risk of morbidity. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy, such as heavy ions-based re-irradiations, are experimental but very intriguing options.

A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with gemcitabine (GEM) vs docetaxel plus cisplatin (CDDP) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

A total of 222 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC between February 2012 and May 2014 in our hospital who received NACT with GEM or docetaxel plus CDDP combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-two patients treated with GEM plus CDDP (GP) combined with CCRT were matched with 52 patients who received docetaxel plus CDDP (TP) combined with CCRT.

Results

With a median follow-up time of 60 months (range, 14–72 months), the 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), local relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 78.8%, 66.0%, 81.0% and 75.9%, respectively, in the GP group and 79.4%, 60.5%, 79.6% and 73.6%, respectively, in the TP group. No statistically significant survival differences were found between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, T3–4 and N2–3 were prognostic factors for poor 5-year PFS and DMFS (all P-values <0.05). Patients in the TP group experienced less grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia but more grade 3–4 leucopenia and neutropenia than those in the GP group (all P-values <0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in other toxicities (all P-values >0.05).

Conclusion

NACT with GP or TP regimen achieved comparable clinical outcome with acceptable toxicities. Both regimens might be a treatment option for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.

Systemic therapies for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The majority of published studies in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) are single-arm trials. Reliable modelling of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes, therefore, is difficult. This study aim to analyse existent literature to estimate the relative efficacy of available systemic regimens in RM-NPC, as well as provide estimates of aggregate OS and PFS.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to March 2015. Clinical trials (in English only) investigating cytotoxic and molecularly targeted agents in adult patients with RM-NPC were included. All relevant studies were assessed for quality using Downs and Blacks (DB) checklist (maximum quality score of 27). Aggregate data analysis and Student's t-test were performed for all identified studies (model A). For studies that published analysable Kaplan-Meier curves, survival data were extracted and marginal proportional hazards models were constructed (model B).

RESULTS

A total of 56 studies were identified and included in model A, 26 of which had analysable Kaplan-Meier curves and were included in model B. The 26 studies in model B had significantly higher mean DB scores than the remaining 30 (17.3 vs 13.7, P=0.002). For patients receiving first line chemotherapy, the estimated median OS was 15.7 months by model A (95% CI, 12.3-19.1), and 19.3 months by model B (95% CI, 17.6-21.1). For patients undergoing second line or higher therapies (2nd+), the estimated median OS was 11.5 months by model A (95% CI 10.1-12.9), and 12.5 months by model B (95% CI 11.9-13.4). PFS estimates for patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy by model A was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.2-9.0), and 8.0 months by model B (95% CI, 7.6-8.8). For patients undergoing therapy in the 2nd+ setting, the estimated PFS by model A was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.8-7.0), and 5.2 months by model B (95% CI, 4.7-5.6).

CONCLUSIONS

We present the first aggregate estimates of OS and PFS for RM-NPC patients receiving first and second-line or higher treatment settings, which could inform the design of future clinical trials in this disease setting.

Long-term results of a phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Objectives

To evaluate long-term results of a phase II study of induction and adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Materials and methods

One hundred and twelve patients (Stage III: 65, IVA-B: 47) with locoregionally advanced NPC were enrolled in this study. All patients received induction chemotherapy consisting of 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine on day 1 and 8, and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on day 1–3, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. Adjuvant chemotherapy for 2 cycles of the same regime was given 28 days after the end of IMRT. The IMRT technique was utilized for all patients.

Results

In total, 97.3% patients completed 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy. The overall response rate (RR) of cervical lymph nodes was 89.0%. Acute toxicities were mainly grade 1–2 myleosuppression and vomiting. And 83.9% patients completed 2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients finished IMRT with RR at the end of IMRT for nasopharynx, lymph nodes of neck and retropharyngeal area being 99.1%, 97.9% and 97.7%, respectively. The 5-year local control, regional control, distant metastasis-free and overall survival rates were 93.2%, 92.3%, 89.0% and 82.1%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival of stage III and IVA-B were 87.0%, and 75.5%, respectively. The incidence of grade 3–4 acute radiotherapy-related mucositis was 28.6%. Severe late toxicities were uncommon.

Conclusion

IMRT combined with GP for locoregionally advanced NPC is well tolerated, effective, and convenient, and warrants further studies.

Metronomic oral cyclosphosphamide as third-line systemic treatment or beyond in patients with inoperable locoregionally advanced recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

There is no standard third-line or further systemic treatment for patients with inoperable locoregionally advanced recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Metronomic oral cyclophosphamide provides an acceptable and cheap option for these heavily pretreated patients who had limited choices. We conducted a prospective phase II single-arm open-label study of metronomic oral cyclophosphamide. Patients with locoregionally advanced recurrent inoperable (rT3/T4, rN2-N3b) or metastatic (rM1) NPC who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (0-2) and had progressed after at least 2 lines of palliative systemic chemotherapy were eligible. They received oral cyclophosphamide between 50 and 150 mg once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), biochemical response (two consecutive declines of plasma EBV DNA after treatment), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles were evaluated. A total of 56 patients were recruited. Thirty-three, 13, 6, 3, and 1 patients received cyclophosphamide as 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th line of therapy respectively. After a median follow-up of 9.95 months (range 1.76-59.51 months), the ORR was 8.9% and the DCR was 57.1%. The median PFS and OS were 4.47 and 9.20 months, respectively. Those with PS 1 had longer median PFS (5.49 months) compared to those with PS 2 (3.75 months, P = .011). Besides, those who had locoregionally recurrent disease had better PFS (8.97 months, 95% CI, 0.53-17.41 months) compared to those who had distant metastases (4.14 months, 95% CI, 2.53-5.75 months, P = .020). Multivariable analysis revealed that PS 1 (vs 2) (P = .020) and locoregional recurrence (vs metastasis) (P = .029) were the only significant independent prognostic factors of PFS. Around 16 (28.6%) patients developed grade ≥3 adverse events, including malaise (5.4%), hematological (8.9%), gastrointestinal (3.6%), feverish (3.6%), and hemorrhagic (1.8%) events. The median cost of the whole drug treatment was 51.65 US dollars (USD) (range 4.15-142.75 USD) (1 USD = 7.8 HK dollars [HKD]). Metronomic oral cyclophosphamide is an acceptable third-line or beyond systemic therapy for locoregionally advanced recurrent or metastatic NPC with acceptable toxicity and limited financial burden.

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Outcomes are poor for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma and no well established first-line chemotherapy is available for the disease. We compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma were recruited from 22 hospitals in China. Key inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ function, and measurable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either gemcitabine (1 g/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m² intravenously on day 1), or fluorouracil (4 g/m² in continuous intravenous infusion over 96 h) and cisplatin (80 mg/m² on day 1 given intravenously) once every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The randomisation was done centrally via an interactive phone response system using block randomisation with a size of six. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by the independent image committee in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one cycle of study drug. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01528618.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 20, 2012, and Oct 30, 2015, 362 patients were randomly assigned to a group (181 to the gemcitabine [plus cisplatin] group and 181 to the fluorouracil [plus cisplatin] group). Median follow-up time for progression-free survival was 19·4 months (IQR 12·1-35·6). The median progression-free survival was 7·0 months (4·4-10·9) in the gemcitabine group and 5·6 months (3·0-7·0) in the fluorouracil group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·55 [95% CI 0·44-0·68]; p<0·0001). A total of 180 patients in the gemcitabine group and 173 patients in the fluorouracil group were included in the safety analysis. Significantly different treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the gemcitabine and fluorouracil groups were leucopenia (52 [29%] vs 15 [9%]; <0·0001), neutropenia (41 [23%] vs 23 [13%]; p=0·0251), thrombocytopenia (24 [13%] vs three [2%]; p=0·0007), and mucosal inflammation (0 vs 25 [14%]; <0·0001). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in seven (4%) patients in the gemcitabine group and ten (6%) in the fluorouracil group. Six (3%) patients in the gemcitabine group and 14 (8%) patients in the fluorouracil group discontinued treatment because of drug-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either group.

INTERPRETATION

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin prolongs progression-free survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The results establish gemcitabine plus cisplatin as the standard first-line treatment option for this population.

FUNDING

Sun Yat-Sen University Clinical Research 5010 Programme, Chinese National Natural Science Foundation project (grant numbers 81372502 and 81201917), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 program numbers 2012AA02A501 and 2012AA02A502), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (grant number S2013010016564).

Cetuximab in combination with chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab in the combined treatment for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC). Between March 2007 and November 2011, a total of 30 R/M NPC patients treated with comprehensive therapy including cetuximab were retrospectively enrolled. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was delivered in recurrent disease with a median dose of 60 Gy. Chemotherapy regimens included TP/TPF (docetaxel 60-75 mg/m d1+DDP 25 mg/m d1-3±5-FU 500 mg/m/day with 120-h infusion), GP (gemcitabine 1.0 g/m d1, d8+DDP 25 mg/m d1-3), and PC (paclitaxel 60 mg/m/week d1+carboplatin AUC 2/week d1). Acute and late toxicities were documented by the radiation oncologists. The median age of the patients was 44 years (range 26-62). A total of 21 patients (70%) achieved response (CR+PR). The median survival time, time to progression, and 2-year overall survival were 23.6, 12.2 months, and 53.3%, respectively. Cetuximab appears to be effective and well tolerated when combined with chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of R/M NPC.

Chemotherapy for Late-Stage Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Complete Response Rates

Complete response (CR) rates reported for cytotoxic chemotherapy for late-stage cancer patients are generally low, with few exceptions, regardless of the solid cancer type or drug regimen. We investigated CR rates reported in the literature for clinical trials using chemotherapy alone, across a wide range of tumour types and chemotherapeutic regimens, to determine an overall CR rate for late-stage cancers. A total of 141 reports were located using the PubMed database. A meta-analysis was performed of reported CR from 68 chemotherapy trials (total 2732 patients) using standard agents across late-stage solid cancers—a binomial model with random effects was adopted. Mean CR rates were compared for different cancer types, and for chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action, using a logistic regression. Our results showed that the CR rates for chemotherapy treatment of late-stage cancer were generally low at 7.4%, regardless of the cancer type or drug regimen used. We found no evidence that CR rates differed between different chemotherapy drug types, but amongst different cancer types small CR differences were evident, although none exceeded a mean CR rate of 11%. This remarkable concordance of CR rates regardless of cancer or therapy type remains currently unexplained, and motivates further investigation.

Sequential Cytokine-Induced Killer Cell Immunotherapy Enhances the Efficacy of the Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Chemotherapy Regimen for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

In this study, we investigated the efficacy of sequential cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) immunotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) regimen chemotherapy in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Between September 2006 and April 2010, 222 NPC patients with distant metastasis after radiotherapy completion were retrospectively analyzed: 112 patients received 4–6 cycles of GC chemotherapy at 4-week intervals, followed by at least 4 cycles of CIK immunotherapy at 2-week intervals (GC+CIK group); the remaining 110 patients received 4–6 cycles of GC chemotherapy alone (GC group). The evaluation of long-term efficacy showed that the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was significantly higher in the GC+CIK group (log-rank test; p = 0.009), as was the overall survival (OS) rate (p = 0.006). In conclusion, sequential CIK treatment may be effective in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of GC chemotherapy for metastatic NPC patients. This study provides a basis for alternative therapeutic strategies for metastatic NPC.

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan: a multicenter prospective Phase II trial

OBJECTIVE

This multicenter Phase II trial evaluated the toxicity/efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

METHODS

Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1 were administered at a 3-week interval. The primary endpoint was the response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, response duration and safety.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were recruited between 2004 and 2008. The response rate was 51.9% (complete remission rate, 9.6%) in the intent-to-treat group. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 9.8 and 14.6 months, respectively. The major Grade III/IV adverse event was leucopenia (61.6%). The mean number of cycles was 6.63 ± 0.40. The regimen was well-tolerated, although one treatment-related death occurred after severe sepsis from aspiration pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is an effective, well-tolerated regimen as a first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

A phase II trial of Endostar combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NCT01612286)

Despite the efficacy of gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) regimens, the outcome of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (M NPC) is poor. We conducted a phase II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of Endostar, an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis, in combination with GC chemotherapy. A total of 30 patients with M NPC were enrolled. The treatment regimen was a combination of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8, cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and Endostar (15 mg/day) from day 1 to day 14 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of four cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The median follow-up was 13.1 months (range: 2.9-20.7 months). A total of 28 patients were evaluated. The median PFS was 19.4 months (95% CI, 13.6-25.1 months). The 1-year PFS rate was 69.8%. The confirmed objective response rate was 85.7% (95% CI, 66.4-95.3%), including complete response in 14 patients (50%). The 1-year overall survival rate was 90.2%. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (46.4%) and thrombocytopenia (14.3%). Our results suggest that a combination of Endostar with GC chemotherapy can lead to effective tumor regression, control disease progression, and improve prognosis in M NPC. Therefore, a combined Endostar and GC regimen should be considered as a potential treatment for patients with M NPC.

Locoregional radiotherapy in patients with distant metastases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma at diagnosis

Systemic chemotherapy is the basic palliative treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC); however, it is not known whether locoregional radiotherapy targeting the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes affects the survival of patients with metastatic NPC. Therefore, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the benefits of locoregional radiotherapy. A total of 408 patients with metastatic NPC were included in this study. The mortality risks of the patients undergoing supportive treatment and those undergoing chemotherapy were compared with that of patients undergoing locoregional radiotherapy delivered alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. The contributions of independent factors were assessed after adjustment for covariates with significant prognostic associations (P < 0.05). Both locoregional radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy were identified as significant independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). The mortality risk was similar in the group undergoing locoregional radiotherapy alone and the group undergoing systemic chemotherapy alone [multi-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.9, P = 0.529]; this risk was 60% lower than that of the group undergoing supportive treatment (HR = 0.4, P = 0.004) and 130% higher than that of the group undergoing both systemic chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy (HR = 2.3, P < 0.001). In conclusion, locoregional radiotherapy, particularly when combined with systemic chemotherapy, is associated with improved survival of patients with metastatic NPC.

Salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in treating locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic nasopharyngectomy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) have been reported to be useful in treating isolated local recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), their efficacy needs to be revaluated with comparison to 2D conventional radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Four hundred ten patients with recurrent NPC were retrospectively analyzed, among whom the patients underwent IMRT, endoscopic nasopharyngectomy, and 2D conventional RT.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival were significantly higher in endoscopic nasopharyngectomy and IMRT groups than in 2D conventional RT group both in the entire series and in the subgroup of patients with recurrent T1 to 2 NPC (p < .05), except in the subgroup of recurrent T3 to 4 stratifications (IMRT vs 2D conventional RT; 28.8% vs 16.8%; p = .351). Furthermore, endoscopic nasopharyngectomy was associated with better OS than IMRT in the recurrent T1 to 2 subgroup (79.2% vs 62.1%; p = .007). Multivariate analysis indicated therapeutic modality was an independent predictor of OS and distant metastasis-free survival (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy and IMRT are associated with an improved OS and distant metastasis-free survival of patients with recurrent NPC compared to 2D conventional RT in early recurrent disease.

Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a clinical dilemma and challenge

Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma, which represents a small proportion of head-and-neck cancers, has a unique set of patho-clinical characteristics. The management of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma remains a challenging clinical problem. Traditional treatments offer limited local control and survival benefits; more seriously, they frequently induce severe late complications. Recently, novel treatment techniques and strategies-including precision radiotherapy, endoscopic surgery or transoral robotic resection, third-generation chemotherapy regimens, and targeted therapies and immunotherapy-have provided new hope for patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Some of these patients can potentially be cured with modern treatments. However, a lack of adequate evidence makes it difficult for clinicians to apply these powerful techniques and strategies. Individualized management guidelines, full evaluation of quality of life in these patients, and a further understanding of the mechanisms underlying recurrence are future directions for research into recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Phase II study of sorafenib in combination with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil to treat recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of sorafenib combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

It was a Simon two-stage designed trial. Chemotherapy-naive patients with recurrent or metastatic disease were enrolled. The regimen was sorafenib 400 mg orally b.i.d., cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1, and 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2)/day CIV for 4 days, repeated every 21 days. After a maximum of six cycles of chemotherapy, patients received maintenance of sorafenib.

RESULTS

In total, 54 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate reached 77.8%, including 1 complete response and 41 partial responses. The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.8-8.4 months), and the median overall survival was 11.8 months (95% CI 10.6-18.7 months). Major toxic effects included hand-foot skin reaction, myelosuppression, and gastrointestinal (GI) reaction. The incidence of hemorrhage was 22.2%, and one patient with liver metastases died of GI bleeding. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was carried out in a subset of patients with liver metastases.

CONCLUSION

Combination of sorafenib, cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) and 5-FU (3000 mg/m(2)) was tolerable and feasible in recurrent or metastatic NPC. Further randomized trials to compare sorafenib plus cisplatin and 5-FU with standard dose of cisplatin plus 5-FU in NPC are warranted.

A Phase II trial of erlotinib as maintenance treatment after gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Despite the efficacy of gemcitabine-platinum regimen, the outcome of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM NPC) is poor. A phase II trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of erlotinib, given as maintenance therapy after gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy in patients with RM NPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m on days 1 and 8 as well as cisplatin 70 mg/m on day 1 (or carboplatin area under curve 5 on day 1, if contraindication to cisplatin) 3 weeks. After 6 chemotherapy cycles (or before in case of progression), patients were switched to erlotinib 150 mg/d 4 weeks. Primary end point was time to progression in patients without progressive disease after 6 chemotherapy cycles and treated with maintenance erlotinib. Epstein-Barr virus DNA plasma levels, measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, were correlated with outcome.

RESULTS

Of 20 enrolled patients, 19 patients received 96 chemotherapy cycles. Fifteen patients were switched to erlotinib and received 36 cycles (range: 1 to 6 cycles). Safety profiles observed with the chemotherapy combination and erlotinib were those expected. Of 12 patients evaluable for response to erlotinib, all progressed except 3 patients (25%) who had stable disease for 3, 4, and 7 months, respectively. Median time to progression was 6.9 months for 13 patients without progressive disease after 6 chemotherapy cycles and treated with erlotinib. No correlation was identified between Epstein-Barr virus DNA plasma levels and clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance or second-line therapy with erlotinib after chemotherapy was not effective in RM NPC. Historical comparison with patients treated with the same chemotherapy alone until progression suggests that it may be detrimental to stop chemotherapy after 6 cycles if disease did not progress.

Comparison of five cisplatin-based regimens frequently used as the first-line protocols in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

No randomized trial has been reported comparing different chemotherapy regimens on disseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aims to compare five cisplatin-based regimens including cisplatin + 5-fluororacil (PF), paclitaxel + cisplatin (TP), gemcitabine + cisplain (GP), paclitaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluororacil (TPF), and bleomycin + cisplatin + 5-fluororacil (BPF) regimen most frequently used as the first-line protocols for metastatic NPC retrospectively.

METHODS

Eight hundred and twenty-two patients with metastatic NPC were divided into five groups according to the regimen they received. Then, their response rate, toxicity, and long-term survival outcome as well as the prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The higher response rates in GP and TPF regimens comparing to PF regimen were achieved (Χ (2) = 4.57, P = 0.033; Χ (2) = 7.04, P = 0.008), as well as in TPF regimen comparing to TP regimen (Χ (2) = 5.579, P = 0.018). The occurrence rate of the major III-IV grade toxicity was significantly different between the five groups. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.247) and overall survival (P = 0.127) among the five groups. Cox multivariate analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors: liver metastases, plasma Epstein Barr Virus (EBV)-DNA level, cycles of chemotherapy, and second-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

PF, TP, and GP are all effective regimens as the first-line chemotherapy for metastatic NPC, which can be well tolerated. Over four cycles of chemotherapy are recommended under no contraindication. Patients should transfer to the second-line regimen after the treatment failure of the first-line chemotherapy.

Expression of RRM1 and its association with resistancy to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Gemcitabine has high activity against nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The level of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) expression is closely related to the efficacy of gemcitabine on non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. However, the expression of RRM1 and its association with sensitivity to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced NPC is not known. In this study, we retrospectively collected 48 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NPC tissues to evaluate the expression of RRM1 using immunohistochemistry. All patients were diagnosed and treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. RRM1 expression was positive in 17(35%) patients. RRM1 expression was not associated with sex, age, performance status, WHO histological type, number of distant metastases, previous treatment, or cycles of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy(P> 0.05). The progression-free survival of the RRM1-positive group was shorter than that of the RRM1-negative group (5 months vs. 7 months, P = 0.036), and the response rate of the RRM1-positive group was somewhat lower than that of the RRM1-negative group (51.6% vs. 35.3%, P = 0.278). There was no significant difference in median survival between the RRM1-positive and RRM1-negative groups (22 months vs. 19 months, P = 0.540). Our results show that RRM1-negative expression is related with longer progression-free survival in advanced NPC patients treated with gemcitabine-based regimens.

Treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a specific entity different from head and neck carcinoma. Incidence is higher in South-East Asia and North Africa. Prognosis, especially for locally advanced stages (IIB - IVB) and metastasis, remains poor: more than third of cases will present local and/or metastatic recurrence. Overall 5-year survival for all NPC stages ranges from 50% to 70%. The role of chemotherapy in metastasis is well established, and remains an important palliative treatment, although no randomized trial has been reported comparing the different chemotherapy regimens. As 1(st)-line treatment, platin-based regimens seems optimal; in 2(nd) line and after progression under platins, there is no consensus: monotherapy with drugs such as gemcitabine, capecitabine or taxanes has been the most widely tested, with acceptable results. Future trials should integrate targeted therapy, in the light of overexpression of EGFR1 and C-kit in NPC. The present study presents a review of the literature concerning the various studies of metastatic NPC.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a treatment paradigm also applicable to patients in Southeast Asia

The majority of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients present at locally advanced stage. The poor prognosis has led to increasing interests in exploring the use of chemotherapy (CT). Intergroup-0099 trial was the first randomized trial comparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with radiotherapy (RT) alone. Its outcome established the treatment standard in the United States as standard of care for locally advanced NPC. However, criticism has been arisen, particularly about its reproducibility and applicability in Southeast Asia where NPC is an endemic disease. Subsequently, new evidence has been provided by a large number of publications from various centers. In this article, through comprehensively analyzing recent meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials performed in Asian centers, we conclude that CCRT as a treatment paradigm is also applicable to patients in Southeast Asia and should be standard of practice in locally advanced disease. However, the CT regimen varied markedly among those trials, and the optimal regimen and scheduling remains to be determined. Moreover, a number of patients experienced toxicities and the treatment compliance was generally poor. With the emergence of new RT techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), the role of concurrent CT with these new techniques needs to be tested. New chemotherapeutics have been investigated in the recurrent or metastatic disease. However, their effectiveness in previously untreated NPC is unclear. Previous efforts have been made for immunotherapy and targeted therapy in palliative setting. Their role in newly diagnosed NPC should be evaluated, particularly when they are combined with CT or RT.

Retrospective case series of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy in patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), 75 patients of Chinese ethnicity with recurrent and metastatic NPC received a combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 25mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3 of a 21-day cycle. All patients were ineligible for re-irradiation or surgery. Of the 75 patients, 4 achieved a complete response, and 28 patients achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 42.7%. The 1-year survival rate was 33.9%, and median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.6 and 9.0 months, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were uncommon.

CONCLUSION

this GC regimen was effective and well tolerated by patients with recurrent and metastatic NPC. The results were comparable with most reports in the recent literature.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current management, future directions and dental implications

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a distinct cancer of the head and neck. Approximately 70% of patients with NPC present with locally advanced disease. Phase III clinical trials support combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the initial treatment of these patients. Current treatment approaches for metastatic disease are variable. Oral complications of therapy for NPC are very common. In order to support cancer therapy the dental provider must be aware of the diagnosis, prognosis and approach to treatment. Dental care requires that radiation fields be understood as well as the permanent changes that occur with high dose radiation therapy. Radiation causes changes in bone and soft tissue that may result in acute and chronic oral complications. The most common acute complications are mucositis, infection, xerostomia and taste changes. Mucositis is of increased severity and duration when chemotherapy is combined with radiation therapy. Chronic complications are due to late effects of radiation therapy including hyposalivation, infection, taste change, dysphagia and trismus. Treatment innovations with molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapy are being assessed to improve treatment outcomes in NPC and will impact oral complications and oral care.

Malignancies of the head and neck: the role for molecular targeted agents

Although cancers arising in the head and neck region are a diverse group of malignancies, a unifying thread remains a poor overall survival for patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic disease. Treatment strategies need to evolve and improve upon established therapeutic practices. As the process of cancer evolution is understood to be derived from aberrations in genetic and epigenetic processes, molecularly targeted agents offer attractive therapeutic options by restoring normal control of oncogenic processes. The direct role for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, nasopharynx and salivary gland carcinomas with these novel, molecularly targeted agents are reviewed and their potential to improve on the existing standard of care is further explored.

Phase II clinical study of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who had been pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHOD

This is an open label, single arm phase II trial. All patients were treated with single agent of gemcitabine. Gemcitabine was given in the dosage of 1.0 g/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, each cycle repeated every 4 weeks. Gemcitabine was added to 100 ml normal saline infused over 30 min.

RESULT

About 32 patients were enrolled in this trial. Thirty patients were assessable for response to treatment. Fourteen patients had a partial response (PR), giving an overall response rate of 43.8% (14/32); 9 patients had stable disease (28.1%) and 7 progressed disease (21.9%). The median time to progression was 5.1 months and median survival time was 16 months, 1 year survival rate was 67%, 2 year overall survival rate was 12%. A total of 11 patients (34.4%) experienced grade 3 and 4 toxicity and the main toxicity was myelosuppression. the non-hematology toxicity was minimal.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of gemcitabine was higher and side effects were minimal in advanced NPC patients after platinum-based chemotherapy failed.

[Chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma]

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NC), especially the undifferenciated type, is a rare malignant disease. Prevalence is high in Southeast Asia and North Africa.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of cancers of the nasopharynx.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

[corrected] A search of the MEDLINE databases from 1970 to 2005, for articles testing chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The key words: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, chemotherapy, concurrent chemo-radiation, were used to access to principal trials.

RESULTS

Nine phase III randomised trials, testing the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma were found. There us increasing evidence attesting to the beneficial effect of adding of chemotherapy to radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced disease (stage III and IV), especially concurrent chemo-radiation, considering the benefit in terms of overall survival. Associations containing cisplatin proved to be most effective. New molecules (capecitabine, taxanes, gemcitabine...) are currently in the course of testing, in phase II studies, for recurrent and metastatic NC, for which there is not still standard treatment.

CONCLUSION

Medline review reveals that concurrent chemo-radiation, containing cisplatin, is standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Metastatic disease is treated by palliative chemotherapy.

Dose Escalation of Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Prospective Randomised Study

AIMS

To investigate prospectively the feasibility and efficacy of dose escalation using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) boost technique for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a randomised study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with locally recurrent NPC (>6 months interval from previous radical radiotherapy, no cervical lymph-node involvement and no distant metastasis) were enrolled. Treatment included conventional external-beam radiotherapy to 54 Gy, followed by a 3D-CRT boost to the gross tumour region. Patients were randomised to three boost dose levels: 16 Gy, 20 Gy and 24 Gy for groups I, II and III, respectively, with 12 patients in each group. All boost doses were delivered in 4-Gy fractions and 3 fractions per week. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 14-44 months).

RESULTS

Three-year, local-recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher (72%) for the high-dose group III than for groups I and II (37% and 28%, respectively, P = 0.047). No significant difference was found in the 3-year overall survival rate among the three groups (72%, 59% and 82% for groups I, II and III, respectively). Three-year distant metastases rates were 17%, 0% and 18%, respectively. Skull-base invasion (P = 0.017) and pathology (P = 0.0006) correlated with overall survival. Treatment was well tolerated and no significant difference was observed among the three groups in acute and late toxicities (grade III toxicity is minimal: 17%, 17%, 0% of oral mucositis and 25%, 17%, 17% of nasopharyngeal mucositis in groups I, II, III, respectively, and 8% leukocytopenia only in group II; no grade IV toxicity occurred in any of the groups except for a fatal bleeding in group III).

CONCLUSIONS

Re-irradiation with high-dose 3D-CRT boost technique results in high local control rate and acceptable toxicity in patients with recurrent NPC. Dose escalation to the boost volume to 78 Gy (54 Gy + 24 Gy boost) results in improved recurrence-free survival compared with lower doses.

Systemic treatment strategies and therapeutic monitoring for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Asia and is etiologically associated with the Epstein-Barr virus. Although radiotherapy can cure most patients with early-stage disease, those with advanced disease often develop recurrences following radiotherapy. The past decade has witnessed significant advances in the systemic treatment of advanced NPC. This article reviews the latest literature regarding: combined modality therapy for locoregionally advanced NPC; clinical trials of novel biologic and cytotoxic therapies for metastatic NPC; and disease monitoring with the plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA assay.

Phase II study of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in the treatment of cisplatin-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a gemcitabine plus vinorelbine combination (GV) for patients with cisplatin-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

Thirty-nine eligible patients received vinorelbine, 20 mg/m(2), followed by gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 44% and 18% of patients, respectively, but there was only one episode of febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild and did not lead to any treatment withdrawal. The overall response rate was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20% to 52%) in an intent-to-treat analysis, with one complete response (3%) and 13 partial responses (33%). The median response duration, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 5.1, 5.6, and 11.9 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Given the moderately high activity and favorable toxicity profile, GV is a reasonable choice for patients with cisplatin-resistant NPC.

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by accelerated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients with stage IV(A-B) nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus gemcitabine as induction chemotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with stage IV(A-B) NPC were treated with 3 cycles of cisplatin plus gemcitabine (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1; gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) 3-weekly as induction chemotherapy, followed by another 3 cycles of concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on day 1) 3-weekly with accelerated radiotherapy (RT) at 70 Gy in 2-Gy fractions, 6 daily fractions per week.

RESULTS

The overall response rate to induction chemotherapy was > 90%, and side effects other than uncomplicated hematologic toxicities were uncommon. All patients completed RT, with 92% receiving > or = 5 cycles of chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 76% and 63%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is a well-tolerated, effective, and convenient induction chemotherapy regimen and warrants further studies to confirm its benefit in advanced NPC.

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Patients with advanced local recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have a poor prognosis. Retreatment by external radiotherapy is frequently the only option but results are usually poor. This study was conducted to evaluate the benefits of adding induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine before reirradiation for locally recurrent NPC.

METHODS

Twenty patients with locally recurrent NPC not amenable to brachytherapy or surgery were enrolled between September 2001 and October 2003. The T stage distribution at recurrence was 5% rT2, 30% rT3, and 65% rT4. Induction chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1.25 g/m days 1 and 8 for 3 times per week for 3 cycles, followed by reirradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 58 chemotherapy cycles were administered to patients and most received 3 cycles. Hematological toxicities were mild, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 55% and 5% of patients, respectively, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 5%. After chemotherapy, 15 patients achieved partial response (75%). Seventeen patients received external reirradiation and one had radiosurgery after chemotherapy. Severe acute radiation toxicities were uncommon. After a median follow-up of 14.5 months, 55% of patients had locoregional progression and 45% had died. The 1-year locoregional progression-free, local progression-free, and overall survival rates were 63%, 68%, and 80%, respectively. In patients with external reirradiation, the 1-year local progression-free and overall survival rates were 75% and 88%. Patients with rT2-3 stage had significantly better 1-year local control rates than those with rT4 stage (100% versus 52%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination cisplatin and gemcitabine is active and well-tolerated in locally recurrent NPC. The current approach of using induction chemotherapy before reirradiation may improve the outcome of patients with advanced local recurrence and merits further investigation.

Survival outcome of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma with first local failure: a study by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Study Group

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article is to report the overall survival (OS) outcome of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with local failure who received salvage treatment and to identify prognostic factors for OS.

METHODS

Between January 1996 and December 2000, 2915 patients received primary radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy for nonmetastatic NPC. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 319 patients had developed local failure as the first failure, with or without synchronous regional/distant failure. OS was calculated from the start of primary RT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for OS in patients with isolated local failure.

RESULTS

The T classification distribution of the local failure (rT classification) was as follows: 68 (21%) rT1 to T2a, 92 (29%) rT2b, 82 (26%) rT3, and 77 (24%) rT4. The rT classification was the same as the initial T classification in 82% of patients. Two hundred seventy-five patients (86%) had isolated local failure, and 232 (84%) of them did not have any distant metastasis or regional failure develop during follow-up. Salvage treatment was given to 200 patients (73%) with isolated local failure. One hundred fifty-nine patients (80%) received reirradiation (108 external beam RT [EBRT], 44 brachytherapy, and seven EBRT plus brachytherapy), 22 patients (11%) underwent nasopharyngectomy with or without postoperative RT, and 19 patients (9%) were treated with chemotherapy alone. Four patients died of RT complications, and one died of chemotherapy toxicity in the absence of active NPC. The 3-year actuarial OS for patients with isolated local failure was 74%. On multivariate analysis, advanced initial T classification (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; p = .0006) and the use of salvage treatment (HR, 0.54; p = .0038) were independent prognostic factors. For the subgroups of patients who had the same recurrent and initial T classification, salvage treatment was associated with improved OS only in the subgroup with T1 to T2 local failure (n = 127; p = 0.0446), but not in the subgroups with T3 (n = 48) or T4 (n = 54) disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with first local failure have localized disease. Salvage treatment is feasible in most of the patients with clinically isolated local failure. Patients who had early initial T classification have a more favorable prognosis. Subgroup analysis suggests that salvage treatment only prolongs survival in patients with T1 to T2 recurrent disease.