Temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b in patients with metastatic melanoma: a phase I dose-escalation study

A Multicenter Randomized Bioequivalence Study of a Novel Ready-to-Use Temozolomide Oral Suspension vs. Temozolomide Capsules

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide (TMZ) oral suspension (Ped-TMZ, KIZFIZO®) is being developed for the treatment of relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, a rare cancer affecting infants and young children. The study assessed the safety and the bioequivalence of this novel pediatric formulation with existing TMZ oral capsules.

METHODS

In vitro dissolution profiles and the bioequivalence were evaluated following the European Medicines Agency "Guidelines on the investigation of Bioequivalence". The phase I, multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover, single-dose bioequivalence study enrolled 36 adult patients with glioblastoma multiforme or lower-grade glioma. Each patient received 200 mg/m2 Ped-TMZ suspension and TMZ capsules (Temodal®) on 2 consecutive days, with the order being randomly assigned. Fourteen blood samples were collected up to 10 h post-dosing. Bioequivalence was assessed by comparing the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the geometric means of maximum TMZ plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUCt). Other endpoints included further pharmacokinetic parameters and safety.

RESULTS

Both formulations exhibited a fast in vitro dissolution profile with more than 85% of TMZ dissolved within 15 min. For the bioequivalence study, thirty patients completed the trial as per the protocol. The ratio of Ped-TMZ/TMZ capsule geometric means (90% CI) for AUCt and Cmax were 97.18% (95.05-99.35%) and 107.62% (98.07-118.09%), respectively, i.e., within the 80-125% bioequivalence limits. No buccal toxicity was associated with Ped-TMZ liquid formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that Ped-TMZ oral suspension and TMZ oral capsule treatment are immediate release and bioequivalent medicines. There were also no unexpected safety signals or local toxicity (funded by ORPHELIA Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04467346).

Effect of l-Dopa in acute temozolomide-induced cognitive impairment in male mice: a possible antineuroinflammatory role

Temozolomide is used commonly in the treatment of some types of cancers, but it may also result in cognitive impairments such as memory deficits. l-Dopa, a well known medicine for the central nervous system, has been shown to have positive effects on some cognitive disorders. Here we sought to investigate the effect of l-Dopa on temozolomide-induced cognitive impairments. BALB/c mice were subjected to 3-days temozolomide and 6-days concomitant l-Dopa/benserazide administration in six groups (control, l-Dopa 25 mg/kg, l-Dopa 75 mg/kg, temozolomide, temozolomide + l-Dopa 25 mg/kg, and temozolomide + l-Dopa 75 mg/kg). Open field test, object location recognition, novel object recognition test, and shuttle-box test were carried out to determine the locomotor, anxiety-like behavior, and memory function of subjects. TNF-α and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene expression in the hippocampus was measured by real-time PCR. Mice treated with temozolomide showed recognition memory impairment, along with hippocampal TNF-α and BDNF mRNA expression level raise, and detection of histological insults in hematoxylin and eosin hippocampal slides. Mice that received temozolomide + l-Dopa showed normal behavioral function and lower TNF-α and BDNF hippocampal mRNA expression levels, and histologically normal hippocampal CA1 region in comparison with mice in the temozolomide group. Our results provide evidence that l-Dopa prevents temozolomide-induced recognition memory deficit in mice at the acute phase probably via l-Dopa antineuroinflammatory effects.

Direct and indirect effects of IFN-α2b in malignancy treatment: not only an archer but also an arrow

Interferon-α2b (IFN-α2b) is a highly active cytokine that belongs to the interferon-α (IFN-α) family. IFN-α2b has beneficial antiviral, antitumour, antiparasitic and immunomodulatory activities. Direct and indirect antiproliferative effects of IFN-α2b have been found to occur via multiple pathways, mainly the JAK-STAT pathway, in certain cancers. This article reviews mechanistic studies and clinical trials on IFN-α2b. Potential regulators of the function of IFN-α2b were also reviewed, which could be utilized to relieve the poor response to IFN-α2b. IFN-α2b can function not only by enhancing the systematic immune response but also by directly killing tumour cells. Different parts of JAK-STAT pathway activated by IFN-α2b, such as interferon alpha and beta receptors (IFNARs), Janus kinases (JAKs) and IFN‐stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3), might serve as potential target for enhancing the pharmacological action of IFN-α2b. Despite some issues that remain to be solved, based on current evidence, IFN-α2b can inhibit disease progression and improve the survival of patients with certain types of malignant tumours. More efforts should be made to address potential adverse effects and complications.

Mitochondrial-associated impairments of temozolomide on neural stem/progenitor cells and hippocampal neurons

Primary brain tumor patients often experience neurological, cognitive, and depressive symptoms that profoundly affect quality of life. The DNA alkylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ), along with radiation therapy forms the standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) - the most common and aggressive of all brain cancers. Numerous studies have reported that TMZ disrupts hippocampal neurogenesis and causes spatial learning deficits in rodents; however, the effect of TMZ on mature hippocampal neurons has not been addressed. In this study, we examined the mitochondrial-mediated mechanisms involving TMZ-induced neural damage in primary rat neural stem/progenitor cells (NSC) and hippocampal neurons. TMZ inhibited mtDNA replication and transcription of mitochondrial genes (ND1 and Cyt b) in NSC by 24 h, whereas the effect of TMZ on neuronal mtDNA transcription was less pronounced. Transmission electron microscopy imaging revealed mitochondrial degradation in TMZ-treated NSC. Acute TMZ exposure (4 h) caused a rapid reduction in dendritic branching and loss of postsynaptic density-95 (PSD95) puncta on dendrites. Longer TMZ exposure impaired mitochondrial respiratory activity, increased oxidative stress, and induced apoptosis in hippocampal neurons. The presented findings suggest that NSC may be more vulnerable to TMZ than hippocampal neurons upon acute exposure; however long-term TMZ exposure results in neuronal mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction and dendritic damage, which may be associated with delayed cognitive impairments.

Inhibiting constitutive neurogenesis compromises long-term social recognition memory

Although the functional role for newborn neurons in neural circuits is still matter of investigation, there is no doubt that neurogenesis modulates learning and memory in rodents. In general, boosting neurogenesis before learning, using genetic-target tools or drugs, improves hippocampus-dependent memories. However, inhibiting neurogenesis may yield contradictory results depending on the type of memory evaluated. Here we tested the hypothesis that inhibiting constitutive neurogenesis would compromise social recognition memory (SRM). Male Swiss mice were submitted to three distinct procedures to inhibit neurogenesis: (1) intra-cerebral infusion of Cystosine-β-D-Arabinofuranoside (AraC); (2) intra-peritoneal injection of temozolomide (TMZ) and (3) cranial gamma irradiation. All three methods decreased cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the dorsal (dDG) and ventral hippocampus (vDG), and the olfactory bulb (OB). However, the percentage inhibition diverged between methods and brain regions. Ara-C, TMZ and gamma irradiation impaired SRM, though only gamma irradiation did not cause side effects on weight gain, locomotor activity and anxiety. Finally, we examined the contribution of cell proliferation in vDG, dDG and OB to SRM. The percent of inhibition in the dDG correlates with SRM, independently of the method utilized. This correlation was observed for granular cell layer of OB and vDG, only when the inhibition was induced by gamma irradiation. Animal's performance was restrained by the inhibition of dDG cell proliferation, suggesting that cell proliferation in the dDG has a greater contribution to SRM. Altogether, our results demonstrate that SRM, similarly to other hippocampus-dependent memories, has its formation impaired by reducing constitutive neurogenesis.

Cerebral melanoma metastases: a critical review on diagnostic methods and therapeutic options

Malignant melanoma represents the third most common cause for cerebral metastases after breast and lung cancer. Central nervous system (CNS) metastases occur in 10 to 40% of patients with melanoma. Most of the symptoms of CNS melanoma metastases are unspecific and depend on localization of the lesion. All patients with new neurological signs and a previous primary melanoma lesion must be investigated. Although primary diagnosis may rely on computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance images are usually used in order to study more precisely the characteristics of the lesions in and to embase the surgical plan. Other possible complementary exams are: positron emission tomography, iofetamine cintilography, immunohistochemistry of liquor, monoclonal antibody immunocytology, optical coherence tomography, and transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Treatment procedures are indicated based on patient clinical status, presence of unique or multiple lesions, and family agreement. Often surgery, radiosurgery, whole brain radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are combined in order to obtain longer remissions and optimal symptom relieve. Corticoids may be also useful in those cases that present with remarkable peritumoral edema and important mass effect. Despite of the advance in therapeutic options, prognosis for patients with melanoma brain metastases remains poor with a median survival time of six months after diagnosis.

Modulation of SOCS protein expression influences the interferon responsiveness of human melanoma cells

Background

Endogenously produced interferons can regulate the growth of melanoma cells and are administered exogenously as therapeutic agents to patients with advanced cancer. We investigated the role of negative regulators of interferon signaling known as suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) in mediating interferon-resistance in human melanoma cells.

Methods

Basal and interferon-alpha (IFN-α) or interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-induced expression of SOCS1 and SOCS3 proteins was evaluated by immunoblot analysis in a panel of n = 10 metastatic human melanoma cell lines, in human embryonic melanocytes (HEM), and radial or vertical growth phase melanoma cells. Over-expression of SOCS1 and SOCS3 proteins in melanoma cells was achieved using the PINCO retroviral vector, while siRNA were used to inhibit SOCS1 and SOCS3 expression. Tyr⁷⁰¹-phosphorylated STAT1 (P-STAT1) was measured by intracellular flow cytometry and IFN-stimulated gene expression was measured by Real Time PCR.

Results

SOCS1 and SOCS3 proteins were expressed at basal levels in melanocytes and in all melanoma cell lines examined. Expression of the SOCS1 and SOCS3 proteins was also enhanced following stimulation of a subset of cell lines with IFN-α or IFN-γ. Over-expression of SOCS proteins in melanoma cell lines led to significant inhibition of Tyr⁷⁰¹-phosphorylated STAT1 (P-STAT1) and gene expression following stimulation with IFN-α (IFIT2, OAS-1, ISG-15) or IFN-γ (IRF1). Conversely, siRNA inhibition of SOCS1 and SOCS3 expression in melanoma cells enhanced their responsiveness to interferon stimulation.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that SOCS proteins are expressed in human melanoma cell lines and their modulation can influence the responsiveness of melanoma cells to IFN-α and IFN-γ.

Temozolomide for the treatment of metastatic melanoma

Questions

What is the role of single-agent temozolomide in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma?

In comparison with single-agent temozolomide, does the addition of interferon-α to temozolomide improve disease-free survival, overall survival, or response rates?

In comparison with single-agent temozolomide, does the addition of thalidomide to temozolomide improve disease-free survival, overall survival, or response rates?

Perspectives

Because of its oral route of administration and its ability to cross the blood–brain barrier, temozolomide is a potentially attractive chemotherapy agent for adult patients with unresectable metastatic malignant melanoma. To provide treatment recommendations for this new agent, the Melanoma Disease Site Group (dsg) of Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) decided to review the available literature on single-agent temozolomide and on temozolomide in combination with interferon-α or thalidomide.

Outcomes

Outcomes of interest included response rates, disease-free survival, overall survival, quality of life, and adverse effects.

Methodology

Evidence was selected and reviewed by two members of the Melanoma dsg and by methodologists. The present practice guideline report was reviewed and approved by the Melanoma dsg, which comprises medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, and dermatologists. External review was obtained through a mailed survey of Ontario practitioners, the results of which were reflected in revisions to the practice guideline. Final approval of the guideline report was obtained from the Report Approval Panel of the pbec.

Practice Guideline

These recommendations apply to adult patients with unresectable metastatic malignant melanoma.

It is reasonable to use temozolomide at a dose of 200 mg/m² orally for 5 days every 4 weeks as initial systemic treatment for patients with unresectable metastatic malignant melanoma.

The addition of moderate-dose interferon-α 2b has produced a significantly higher response rate than has single-agent temozolomide in a large randomized phase iii study. However, overall survival was not altered, and grades 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities were higher with the combined treatment. At the present time, the addition of interferon-α to temozolomide is not recommended.

One randomized phase ii study and six other phase ii studies showed encouraging response rates when thalidomide was combined with temozolomide. However, the doses and schedules of temozolomide in those studies differed from the conventionally prescribed doses and schedules. It is not clear whether the improved response rates were attributable to the small number of patients in the studies, the different temozolomide doses and schedules, or the addition of thalidomide. Further phase iii studies are required to confirm whether a benefit is associated with the combination of temozolomide and thalidomide. Therefore, at this time, it is not recommended that thalidomide be combined with temozolomide.

Qualifying Statements

Dacarbazine is the only chemotherapy drug currently approved for the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma. In large randomized trials, response rates with dacarbazine ranged from 6% to 15%. Almost all responses were partial, with a median response duration of only 7–8 months. Given these disappointing overall results, the consensus among most physicians who are treating patients with metastatic malignant melanoma is that recommending more convenient treatment or experimental treatment to these patients is appropriate.

Because of oral dosing, temozolomide is a reasonable choice, particularly for patients who would have difficulty traveling to cancer centres for intravenous chemotherapy.

Temozolomide has demonstrated efficacy equal to that of dacarbazine in a randomized phase iii trial. However, unlike dacarbazine, temozolomide is a convenient oral treatment that penetrates the blood–brain barrier and that has shown activity against brain metastases. Although surgery is the preferred treatment modality for patients with solitary brain metastases from melanoma, temozolomide is the preferred chemotherapy for patients with brain metastases who require systemic treatment.

Temozolomide associated with PEG-interferon in patients with metastatic melanoma: a multicenter prospective phase I/II study

Metastatic melanoma treatment remains disappointing, and a combined approach by chemotherapy and immunotherapy might increase the response rates through a synergistic action. Accordingly, a clinical trial using oral temozolomide (TMZ) and subcutaneous PEG-interferon alpha-2b (PEG) in patients with metastatic melanoma was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dosage of both drugs and the antitumoral response. A multicenter, prospective, phase I/II study was conducted in 31 metastatic melanoma patients, without cerebral metastasis. Dose escalation was performed according to the modified continual reassessment method scale and resulted in four cohorts of patients: TMZ 150 mg/m2 5 days/week each 4 weeks and PEG 0.5 microg/kg/week - TMZ 150 mg/m2 5 days/week and PEG 1.0 microg/kg/week - TMZ 200 mg/m2 5 days/week and PEG 0.5 microg/kg/week - TMZ 200 mg/m2 5 days/week and PEG 1.0 microg/kg/week. Patients received a maximum of six cycles. Thirty-three patients were enrolled in this study: one in the first dose level, one in the second one, 18 in the third one and 11 in the fourth one. At level 4, four of 11 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity and four nondose-limiting toxicity; toxicity was mainly hematologic (grade IV thrombocytopenia). An objective response was observed in five patients (two complete response and three partial response) receiving level 3 or 4 of treatment. The disease remained stable in three patients, and six of 31 patients were alive 24 months after enrollment. The association of oral TMZ with subcutaneous PEG in metastatic melanoma displayed an unacceptable hematological toxicity with the dosages of 200 mg/m2 5 days/week and 1 microg/week, respectively. At a lower level, this treatment was effective and deserves further investigations to define its indications in metastatic melanoma patients.

Temozolomide for the treatment of metastatic melanoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review examines the role of temozolomide in patients with metastatic melanoma. Outcomes of interest include response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, quality of life, and adverse effects.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from 1980 through to 2005 using variations on the search terms: melanoma, clinical trial, random, temozolomide, temodal, and temodar. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting proceedings were searched from 1996 to 2005. Relevant articles and abstracts were selected and reviewed by two reviewers, and the reference lists from these sources were searched for additional trials.

RESULTS

Two randomized phase III trials and three randomized phase II trials were located. In addition, 21 phase I or II trials investigating single-agent temozolomide, temozolomide plus interferon-alpha, and temozolomide plus thalidomide were reviewed. A direct comparison of temozolomide and dacarbazine demonstrated equal efficacy for response rates and overall survival; however, no significant difference was reported. A second phase III study comparing single-agent temozolomide with temozolomide combined with interferon-alpha indicated a significantly higher response rate for the combination treatment arm, but no difference in overall survival was noted. Further phase III studies are required to confirm whether there is a benefit associated with the combination of temozolomide and interferon-alpha or thalidomide.

CONCLUSION

Our review of the available literature suggests that temozolomide demonstrates comparable activity to the current standard treatment, dacarbazine, with the additional benefit of being a convenient oral treatment that penetrates the blood-brain barrier.

GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MALIGNANT MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES

OBJECTIVE

Radiosurgery is increasingly used to manage malignant melanoma brain metastases. We reviewed our series of patients who underwent radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases to assess clinical outcomes and identify prognostic factors for survival and cerebral disease control.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-four patients had radiosurgery for the management of 754 metastatic tumors. A mean of 2.6 tumors were irradiated per procedure. The median tumor volume was 4.4 cm3. The median margin and maximum doses used were 18 and 32 Gy, respectively.

RESULTS

The median survival was 5.3 months after radiosurgery (mean, 10 mo; range, 0.2–114.3 mo). Patients survived a median of 7.8 months (mean, 13.4 mo) from the diagnosis of brain metastases and 44.9 months (mean, 69 mo) after the diagnosis of the primary tumor. Survival was better in patients with controlled systemic disease (12.7 mo), single brain metastasis (6.8 mo), and a Karnofsky performance score of 90 or 100% (6.3 mo). Sustained local control was achieved in 86.2% of tumors. Increased tumor volume and previous evidence of hemorrhage increased the risk of local failure. Multiple lesions and failure to provide systemic immunotherapy were predictors for the occurrence of new brain metastases, which developed in 41.7% of the patients. Symptomatic radiation changes occurred in 6.6% of the patients. Overall, 71.4% of the patients improved or remained clinically stable. Brain disease was the cause of death in 40.5% of the patients, usually from the development of new metastases.

CONCLUSION

Gamma knife radiosurgery for malignant melanoma brain metastases is safe and effective and provides a high rate of durable local control. Improved survival can be achieved in patients with single metastasis, controlled systemic disease, and a high Karnofsky performance score.

Temozolomide in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced melanoma. A phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

There is now increasing evidence that a constitutive expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 plays a role in the development and progression of malignant epithelial tumors. Expression of COX-2 is seen in 93% of melanomas, as determined by immunohistochemistry. Temozolomide (TMZ) has demonstrated activity against melanoma and has been investigated as single agent or in combination. We designed a phase II study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of TMZ and celecoxib (a COX-2 inhibitor) in patients with advanced melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2003 to July 2004, 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Nineteen patients were M1a, six M1b and 27 M1c. Patients received TMZ 200 mg/m(2) per day p.o. for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks and celecoxib 400 mg b.i.d. p.o. for a maximum of six cycles. Celecoxib was continued until progression.

RESULTS

The median age was 63 years. There were 29 males and 23 females. Among 50 assessable patients, there were 11 (21.5%) objective responses including five complete responses and six partial responses. Twenty patients (38.5%) had stabilization of their disease, and 19 (36.5%) progressed. The median time to progression was 4.6 months and the median survival 9.5 months. Twenty-two patients (41.5%) completed all cycles of treatment. Median relative dose intensity of TMZ was 0.99 (range 0.6-1.2). Most commonly seen toxic effects included anemia (27.5%), neutropenia (17.5%), thrombocytopenia (33%), nausea/vomiting (75%), gastrointestinal (52%) and fatigue (46.5%). One patient discontinued due to severe toxicity. COX-2 was determined by immunohistochemistry and was expressed in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The combination of TMZ and celecoxib is safe and potentially effective in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Randomized studies are needed to explore the role of celecoxib in combination with chemotherapy or as maintenance treatment in these patients.

A spatiotemporal, patient individualized simulation model of solid tumor response to chemotherapy in vivo: the paradigm of glioblastoma multiforme treated by temozolomide

A novel four-dimensional, patient-specific Monte Carlo simulation model of solid tumor response to chemotherapeutic treatment in vivo is presented. The special case of glioblastoma multiforme treated by temozolomide is addressed as a simulation paradigm. Nevertheless, a considerable number of the involved algorithms are generally applicable. The model is based on the patient's imaging, histopathologic and genetic data. For a given drug administration schedule lying within acceptable toxicity boundaries, the concentration of the prodrug and its metabolites within the tumor is calculated as a function of time based on the drug pharamacokinetics. A discretization mesh is superimposed upon the anatomical region of interest and within each geometrical cell of the mesh the most prominent biological "laws" (cell cycling, necrosis, apoptosis, mechanical restictions, etc.) are applied. The biological cell fates are predicted based on the drug pharmacodynamics. The outcome of the simulation is a prediction of the spatiotemporal activity of the entire tumor and is virtual reality visualized. A good qualitative agreement of the model's predictions with clinical experience supports the applicability of the approach. The proposed model primarily aims at providing a platform for performing patient individualized in silico experiments as a means of chemotherapeutic treatment optimization.

Phase II multicentre study of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b in metastatic malignant melanoma

OBJECTIVE

Temozolomide is a novel oral alkylating agent, active against metastatic melanoma. Combinations of chemotherapy and biological response modifiers have been associated with increased antitumour activity. A multicentre phase II study was performed to assess the activity and toxicity of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma. Previously untreated patients received temozolomide administered orally at a dose of 150 mg/m/day for 5 days every 4 weeks, in combination with interferon given continuously subcutaneously twice a week at a dose of 10 MU/m. Treatment continued until disease progression or for a maximum of 12 months.

RESULTS

From June 1999 to August 2002, 27 eligible patients were included in the study at six centres. Median age was 59 (28-77) years; 17 male and 10 female patients were recruited; the median Karnofsky performance score was 90 (70-100); three patients had received prior adjuvant interferon; the majority of patients had fewer than three involved sites. A total of 96 cycles were administered; there were one complete response, four partial response and five stable disease (overall response rate: 18.5%, 95% confidence interval: 6.3-38.1). All responses were seen in patients with exclusively lymph node and pulmonary disease [M1a (one patient); M1b (four patients)]. The median response duration was 6.9 months. One patient remains in complete remission at 4 years. The median time to progression and the median survival were 1.87 and 9.5 months, respectively. Haematological toxicity was neutropenia G-IV: 1, G-III: 4, thrombocytopenia G-III: 2, and anaemia G-III: 2. Predominant non-haematological toxicity was hepatotoxicity G-III: 4. Other toxicities were mild or moderate. Dose reduction was required for nine cycles of interferon, one of temozolomide and two of both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Temozolomide in combination with interferon is a well-tolerated palliative regimen that has moderate activity against metastatic melanoma. Further evaluation of this regimen in comparative studies or in combination with other drugs is warranted.

Phase II study of temozolomide plus pegylated interferon-α-2b for metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide and interferon-alpha-2b (IFN-alpha-2b) are both active in melanoma. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of temozolomide in combination with pegylated IFN-alpha-2b in patients with metastatic melanoma without brain metastases was investigated.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed, unresectable, American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV melanoma were enrolled in an open-label, Phase II study. The primary endpoints were tumor response and safety. Patients received temozolomide (75 mg/m2/dayx6 weeks with a 2-week break between cycles) plus concomitant subcutaneous pegylated IFN-alpha-2b (0.5 microg/kg/wk, continuously). Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (median age, 55 years) with Stage IV melanoma and a median of 3 metastatic sites were enrolled and received a median of 1 cycle (i.e., 8 weeks) of therapy (range, 0-6 cycles). Eleven patients (31%) (95% confidence interval, 16% to 47%) had an objective tumor response, including 3 with clinical complete response durations of 6 months, 20 months, and 32+ months and 8 with partial responses. Three patients with a partial or mixed response were subsequently rendered free of clinically detectable disease with surgery. The median survival was 12 months with a median follow-up among survivors of 16 months. No patient developed brain metastases while receiving study treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Hematologic toxicity consisted mainly of lymphopenia and leukopenia (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Grades 1-3); no Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of temozolomide plus pegylated IFN-alpha-2b had antitumor activity and was well tolerated in patients with metastatic melanoma. Therefore, further study is warranted.

Temozolomide in combination with interferon-alfa versus temozolomide alone in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a randomized, phase III, multicenter study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma equal to that of dacarbazine (DTIC), the standard chemotherapeutic agent for melanoma. As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-alpha in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week).

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-two patients were eligible for an intent-to-treat analysis, 271 patients were treated per protocol. In the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm, 33 (24.1%) of 137 patients responded to therapy (partial or complete remission) whereas in the monotherapy arm, in 18 (13.4%) of 134 patients, a response was evident. Thus, the response rate was significantly higher in the combination arm (P = .036). Median survival time was 8.4 months for patients treated with TMZ (95% CI, 7.07 to 9.27) and 9.7 months for those treated with the combination (95% CI, 8.26 to 11.18; P = .16). Dose modifications and interval prolongations due to hematologic toxicity were significantly more frequent in the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In metastatic melanoma treatment with TMZ + IFN-alpha leads to a significantly superior OR rate compared to treatment with TMZ alone, which did not translate into prolonged survival in our study population.

Simulating chemotherapeutic schemes in the individualized treatment context: the paradigm of glioblastoma multiforme treated by temozolomide in vivo

A novel patient individualized, spatiotemporal Monte Carlo simulation model of tumor response to chemotherapeutic schemes in vivo is presented. Treatment of glioblastoma multiforme by temozolomide is considered as a paradigm. The model is based on the patient's imaging, histopathologic and genetic data. A discretization mesh is superimposed upon the anatomical region of interest and within each geometrical cell of the mesh the most prominent biological "laws" (cell cycling, apoptosis, etc.) in conjunction with pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics information are applied. A good qualitative agreement of the model's predictions with clinical experience supports the applicability of the approach to chemotherapy optimization.

Temozolomide and cisplatin versus temozolomide in patients with advanced melanoma: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent that produces methyl adducts at the 0.6 position of guanine. The methyl adducts are removed by the DNA repair enzyme AGAT. As demonstrated by in vitro studies, cisplatin (CDDP) is able to down-regulate the AGAT activity, suggesting that CDDP could enhance the antitumor activity of TMZ. We designed a randomized phase II study to evaluate and compare the activity and safety profile of the combination versus single-agent TMZ in patients with advanced melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2000 to April 2002, 132 patients were enrolled on the study. Patient and tumor characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Patients with cerebral metastases were included. Patients received TMZ 200 mg/m(2)/day orally for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TMZ + CDDP 200 mg/m(2) daily on days 1-5 and 75 mg/m(2) of CDDP on day 1.

RESULTS

Tumor responses (complete and partial responses) were seen in 16 patients (26%) in arm A and 19 patients (29%) in arm B. The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.8 months in arm A and 5.8 months in arm B. The median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months in arm A and 12 months in arm B. The difference between treatment arms regarding objective response rates, TTP and OS were not statistically significant. Toxicity was comparable between the two arms for anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, constipation and arthralgias/myalgias. There was significantly more grade 3 and 4 emesis in the combination arm.

CONCLUSIONS

No clear benefit in terms of response rates, median TTP or OS was shown with the combination of TMZ + CDDP. Additionally, the combination was associated with higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 emesis.

Lentivirus-mediated expression of mutant MGMTP140K protects human CD34+ cells against the combined toxicity of O6-benzylguanine and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-nitrosourea or temozolomide

Lentiviral vectors are capable of efficiently transducing nondividing and slowly dividing cells, including hematopoietic stem cells, resulting in stable integration and sustained transgene expression. We constructed human immunodeficiency virus type 1-based self-inactivating lentiviral vectors to express either wild-type or an O6-benzylguanine (O6-beG)-resistant mutant form of the human O6-alkylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT; DNA-O6-methylguanine:[protein]-L-cysteine S-methyltransferase, EC 2.1.1.63) and transduced K562 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized human peripheral blood CD34+ cells. After transduction, K562 cells expressed high levels of MGMT as determined by Western blot, immunocytochemistry, and biochemical assay. A colony-forming survival assay showed significant protection against O6-beG plus 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-nitrosourea (BCNU) or temozolomide (TMZ) toxicity. Similarly, a single transduction of CD34+ cells resulted in a 13- to 14-fold increase in the level of MGMT expression. In comparison with non-transduced cells, mutant MGMTP140K-transduced CD34+ cells showed significant resistance against the combined toxicity of O6-beG with either TMZ or BCNU: there was an approximately 9-fold increase in the survival of colony-forming cells as indicated by the IC50 values after O6-beG plus TMZ treatment and an approximately 5-fold increase in the case of O6-beG plus BCNU treatment. These results show that lentivirus-mediated expression of MGMTP140K can efficiently protect the hematopoietic compartment against the combined toxicity of O6-beG plus TMZ or BCNU.

Temozolomide: realizing the promise and potential

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The discovery of temozolomide in the 1980s was expected to be an important advance in improving survival for patients with malignant brain tumors. Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated the activity of temozolomide against recurrent or refractory gliomas and noncentral nervous system malignancies. In the last 2 years, studies have focused on exploring strategies to optimize the efficacy of temozolomide, including evaluating different temozolomide dosing schedules and combining temozolomide with other antineoplastic agents, radiation therapy, or drug resistance-modifying agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

A critical review of these studies suggests that temozolomide, as currently used, has limited efficacy in treating refractory malignant infiltrative brain tumors, and survival benefit is, at best, a few weeks longer than that with procarbazine. There is enthusiasm about the activity of temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent low-grade gliomas and advanced malignant melanomas. Temozolomide has activity and a favorable safety profile in all dosing schedules tested. Nevertheless, the trials evaluating the efficacy of temozolomide suffer from being uncontrolled, with short follow-up periods.

SUMMARY

Despite the advantages of a favorable safety profile and oral administration, temozolomide has yet to realize its initial promise and full potential. Studies of temozolomide combined with novel drug resistance-modifying agents will likely improve disease control while minimizing toxicities, leading to improved survival benefit. Larger, randomized trials comparing temozolomide with standard therapy are needed to confirm the suggested benefit from temozolomide in malignant brain tumors. Temozolomide will continue to be attractive as an agent in the treatment of brain tumors because of its desirable features and safety.

New advances on the functions of epidermal growth factor receptor and ceramides in skin cell differentiation, disorders and cancers

Recent advances in understanding of the biological functions of the epidermal growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-EGFR) system and ceramide production for the maintenance of skin integrity and barrier function are reported. In particular, the opposite roles of EGFR and ceramide cascades in epithelial keratinocyte proliferation, migration and terminal differentiation are described. Moreover, the functions of ceramides in the epidermal permeability barrier are reviewed. The alterations in EGFR signaling and ceramide metabolism, which might be involved in the etiopathogenesis of diverse skin disorders and cancers, are described. New progress in understanding of skin organization, which might provide the basis for the design of new transcutaneous drug delivery techniques as well as for the development of new therapies of skin disorders and cancers, are reported.

Temozolomide and interferon alpha 2b in metastatic melanoma stage IV

BACKGROUND

A multicentre, centrally randomized, open-labelled study with temozolomide and interferon (IFN)-alpha 2b was carried out to study the therapeutic effect in patients with metastatic melanoma stage IV.

OBJECTIVES

The response rate, efficacy, side-effects, reasons for discontinuation of therapy and survival rate of 47 patients treated with temozolomide in combination with two different dosing regimens of IFN-alpha 2b were documented.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Twenty-nine male and 18 female patients (mean age 57.6 years, range 34-74) were centrally randomized to two different arms: 20 patients received a treatment schedule with temozolomide 150 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 orally every 28 days in combination with IFN-alpha 2b 10 MIU m(-2) every other day and 27 patients received temozolomide 150 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 every 28 days in combination with IFN-alpha 2b in a fixed dose of 10 MIU every other day.

RESULTS

We observed an overall response rate of 27.6% comprising five complete remissions (10.6%: one patient group A, four patients group B), in two of these five patients at the last follow-up in the study (4.3%, both in group B); and eight partial remissions (17%: six patients in group A, two patients in group B), in three of these eight patients at the last follow-up in the study (6.4%, two patients in group A, one patient in group B). Three patients showed stable disease (6.4%: one patient in group A, two patients in group B). Mean survival was 14.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10-19] with no significant differences between treatment groups. However, there was a significant correlation with response after three cycles (log rank test, P < 0.03). Within the 32 patients who completed at least three cycles of therapy, seven patients (three in group A and four in group B) with a partial or complete response showed a significantly better mean survival of 30.6 months (95% CI 19.1-42) compared with 25 patients who did not respond (13.7 months 95% CI 9.2-18.3). In total, patients with at least one complete remission showed the longest survival (37.1 months 95% CI 26.3-47.9), followed by patients with at least one partial response (17.4 95% CI 10.9-23.9). Major side-effects of the treatment were nausea, vomiting, headache, leucopenia, thrombopenia, elevation of liver function parameters and neurological symptoms. In five patients, the side-effects led to a discontinuation of treatment: neurological symptoms (two patients), sepsis (one patient), brain haemorrhage (one patient) and exanthema (one patient). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of temozolomide and IFN-alpha 2b can easily be administered and shows tolerable toxicity. When an objective response occurs after three cycles, it indicates a significant survival advantage.

A phase II trial of temozolomide and IFN-alpha in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

The combination of temozolomide (TEM) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) previously demonstrated a 30% response rate in metastatic melanoma. A single institution, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of TEM/IFN in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was conducted. Safety and tumor response were the main outcomes. Eligible patients received 200 mg/m(2)/day TEM orally on days 1-5 every 28 days, with IFN 2.5 million U/m(2)/day subcutaneously (s.c.) three alternate days/week for days 1-15 first cycle, then 5 million U/m(2)/day s.c. 3 alternate days/week throughout each 28-day cycle. Efficacy was evaluated every 8 weeks, and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were treated with dose reductions of the culprit drug. Sixteen patients (ages 37-67) were initially enrolled. Of the 14 evaluable patients, there was one minor response. Best response was stable disease, with 7 patients remaining on study for > or =6 months. Five were alive for more than 2 years, and 2 remain alive at 45 and 50 months after enrollment. DLTs included TEM-induced myelosuppression and IFN-induced fever/chills. Other toxicities were mild to moderate (grades 1-3). The combination of TEM/IFN proved quite tolerable. This regimen appears inactive in terms of response in this population with poor prognosis, but the patients with stable disease > or =6 months remain of interest.

Temozolomide and interferon-alpha in metastatic melanoma: a phase II study of the Italian Melanoma Intergroup

Temozolomide (TMZ) is a new oral alkylating agent which has proven to be as active as dacarbazine (DTIC) in the treatment of melanoma, but with a lower toxicity. A multicentric phase II trial was conducted in an out-patient setting to determine the therapeutic activity and safety of TMZ in combination with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha). From June 2000 to July 2001, 41 patients were recruited to receive TMZ 200 mg/m orally on days 1-5 every 28 days and with 5 MU IFN-alpha subcutaneously three times a week, continuously for eight cycles or until disease progression occurred. Of the 40 treated patients, two complete responses (5%) and three partial responses (7.5%) were observed, with a median duration of 4 months (range, 1.5-13.5 months). Thirteen patients (32.5%) had stable disease for a median of 2.5 months. Time to progression was 2.6 months and the median overall survival was 11.8 months. Nine patients (22.5%) developed brain metastases. The grade 4 toxicity observed in seven patients was of a transient haematological nature. This combination therapy is well tolerated but does not appear to increase the response rate or overall survival with respect to TMZ alone or to chemotherapeutic regimens. Further and more complex associations of these two drugs could be investigated in specific subsets of patients, in particular to evaluate its real efficacy in preventing brain metastases.

Management of brain metastases

Advances in neurosurgery and the development of stereotactic radiosurgery have expanded treatment options available for patients with brain metastases. However, despite several randomized clinical trials and multiple uncontrolled studies, there is not a uniform consensus on the best treatment strategy for all patients with brain metastases. The heterogeneity of this patient population in terms of functional status, types of underlying cancers, status of systemic disease control, and number and location of brain metastases make such consensus difficult. Nevertheless, in certain situations, there is Class I evidence that supports one approach or another. The primary objectives in the management of this patient population include improved duration and quality of survival. Very few patients achieve long-term survival after the diagnosis of a brain metastasis.

Phase II study of temozolomide plus thalidomide for the treatment of metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE

To further investigate the efficacy and safety of temozolomide plus thalidomide in patients with metastatic melanoma without brain metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed advanced-stage metastatic melanoma were enrolled in an open-label, phase II study. The primary end point was response rate. Patients received temozolomide (75 mg/m2/d x 6 weeks with a 2-week rest between cycles) plus concomitant thalidomide (200 mg/d with dose escalation to 400 mg/d for patients < 70 years old, or 100 mg/d with dose escalation to 250 mg/d for patients >/= 70 years old). Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (median age, 62 years) with stage IV (three patients with M1a, eight with M1b, and 26 with M1c) or stage IIIc (one patient) melanoma and a median of four metastatic sites were enrolled, and received a median of two cycles of therapy. Twelve patients (32%) had an objective tumor response, including one with an ongoing complete response of 25+ months' duration and 11 with partial responses. Five patients achieving partial response with a more than 90% reduction of disease were converted to a complete response with surgery. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Median survival was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.05 to 19.38 months), with a median follow-up among survivors of 24.3 months.

CONCLUSION

The combination of temozolomide plus thalidomide seems to be a promising and well-tolerated oral regimen for metastatic melanoma that merits further study.

Randomized phase II study of temozolomide given every 8 hours or daily with either interferon alfa-2b or thalidomide in metastatic malignant melanoma

PURPOSE

Temozolomide is an imidazotetrazine with a mechanism of action similar to dacarbazine and equivalent activity in melanoma. It is well tolerated and is a candidate for combination chemotherapy and schedule manipulation. In this study, we combined temozolomide with interferon alfa-2b and, separately, with thalidomide, and we administered temozolomide alone in a compressed schedule. The objectives of this randomized phase II, two-center study were to determine response rates, overall survival, and tolerability of the regimens in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred eighty-one patients with metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive up to six 4-weekly cycles consisting of temozolomide 200 mg/m2 every 8 hours for five doses, or temozolomide 200 mg/m2 daily for days 1 to 5 plus interferon alfa-2b 5 MU (million International Units) subcutaneously three times a week, or temozolomide 150 mg/m2 (increased after one cycle to 200 mg/m2) daily on days 1 to 5 plus thalidomide 100 mg daily days 1 to 28.

RESULTS

The treatment arms were well balanced for known prognostic factors. Median survival was 5.3 months for 8-hourly temozolomide, 7.7 months for temozolomide/interferon, and 7.3 months for temozolomide/thalidomide; and 1-year survivals were 18%, 26%, and 24%, respectively. Response or disease stabilization occurred in 20% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 33%) given 8-hourly temozolomide, 21% (95% CI, 12% to 33%) given temozolomide/interferon, and 25% (95% CI, 15% to 38%) given temozolomide/thalidomide. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities were similar in each arm except for infection, which was more frequent with 8-hourly temozolomide. There were fewer instances of grade 3 or 4 myelotoxicity with temozolomide/thalidomide.

CONCLUSION

Of the three regimens tested, the combination of temozolomide and thalidomide seems the most promising for future study.