Quality of life and pain relief during treatment with calcitriol and docetaxel in symptomatic metastatic androgen-independent prostate carcinoma

Olanzapine-samidorphan combination tablets for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder - what is it, and will it be used?

INTRODUCTION

: Although olanzapine remains one of the most efficacious antipsychotic medications for the treatment of schizophrenia, there are significant tolerability concerns related to its weight and metabolic profile. Olanzapine-samidorphan combination tablets (OLZ/SAM), branded as Lybalvi, is a newly FDA approved formulation aimed at attenuating antipsychotic induced weight gain via modulation of the endogenous opioid system with samidorphan, while retaining the robust antipsychotic efficacy of olanzapine.

AREAS COVERED

: We reviewed the published literature of OLZ/SAM for the management of schizophrenia using the US National Library of Medicine's PubMed.gov resource. Topics covered in this narrative review include the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and efficacy of OLZ/SAM.

EXPERT OPINION

: OLZ/SAM is an effective and well tolerated pharmacologic option in mitigating olanzapine induced weight gain while retaining olanzapine's efficacy. It has a limited effect on metabolic laboratory parameters and cumulatively tends to limit weight gain rather than promote weight loss. Additional research will be needed to determine its effectiveness compared to alternative strategies to attenuate antipsychotic induced weight gain.

Assessment of anticancer-treatment outcome in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer-going beyond PSA and imaging, a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

In the past years, there has been significant progress in anticancer drug development for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the current instruments to assess clinical treatment response have limitations and may not sufficiently reflect patient benefit. Our objective was to systematically identify tools to evaluate both patient benefit and clinical anticancer-treatment response as basis for an international consensus process and development of a specific pragmatic instrument for men with CRPC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and CINAHL were searched to identify currently available tools to assess anticancer-treatment benefit, other than standard imaging procedures and prostate-specific antigen measurements, namely quality of life (QoL), detailed pain assessment, physical function and objective measures of other complex cancer-related syndromes in patients with CRPC. Additionally, all CRPC phase III trials published in the last 5 years were reviewed as well as studies using physical function tools in a general cancer population. The PRIMSA statement was followed for the systematic review process.

RESULTS

The search generated 1096 hits, 185 full-text papers were screened and finally 73 publications were included. Additional 89 publications were included by hand-search. We identified a total of 98 tools used in CRPC trials and grouped these into three categories: 22 tools assessing QoL domains and subgroups, 47 tools for pain assessment and 29 tools for objective measures, mainly physical function and assessment of skeletal disease burden.

CONCLUSION

A wide variety of assessment tools and also efforts to standardize and harmonize patient-reported outcomes and pain assessment were identified. However, the specific needs of the increasing CRPC population living longer with their incurable cancer are insufficiently captured and objective physical outcome measures are under-represented. In the age of new anticancer drug targets and principles, new methods to monitor patient relevant outcomes of antineoplastic therapy are of utmost importance.

A phase II study of high-dose calcitriol combined with mitoxantrone and prednisone for androgen-independent prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the preliminary efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life (QoL) of high-dose calcitriol (DN-101) combined with mitoxantrone and glucocorticoids in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with metastatic AIPC and no previous chemotherapy received DN-101 180 microg orally on day 1 and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 2 every 21 days with continuous daily prednisone 10 mg orally for a maximum of 12 cycles. A confirmed decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels by half was the primary endpoint. QoL was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire, and pain and analgesic use were evaluated.

RESULTS

Five of 19 patients (26%; 95% confidence interval, CI, 9-51) achieved a >/=50% decline in PSA level. The median (95% CI) time to PSA progression was 16 (6-26) weeks. The overall median (95% CI) survival was 16 (6-26) months; 47 (21-73)% of patients achieved an analgesic response. Toxicity was similar to that expected with mitoxantrone and prednisone alone. The QoL analysis suggested a decrease in physical functioning and increase in fatigue, insomnia, and diarrhoea.

CONCLUSIONS

DN-101 given every 3 weeks does not add significant activity to mitoxantrone and prednisone in AIPC, as measured by the PSA decline. The high rate of analgesic response is encouraging. The addition of DN-101 does not appear to increase the toxicity of mitoxantrone.

Vitamin D and intervention trials in prostate cancer: from theory to therapy

Studies of vitamin D and prostate cancer have advanced rapidly from the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of prostate cancer to intervention trials of vitamin D administration in clinical cancer. The hormonal form of vitamin D, 1,25(OH)(2)D, exerts prodifferentiating, antiproliferative, anti-invasive, and antimetastatic effects on prostate cells. Moreover, normal prostate cells synthesize 1,25(OH)(2)D from serum levels of the prohormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The autocrine synthesis of 1,25(OH)(2)D by prostatic cells provides a biochemical mechanism whereby vitamin D may prevent prostate cancer. Many prostate cancer cells have lost the ability to synthesize 1,25(OH)(2)D but still possess 1,25(OH)(2)D receptors. This suggests that whereas vitamin D (e.g., cholecalciferol) might prevent prostate cancer, existing prostate tumors likely would require treatment with 1,25(OH)(2)D and/or its analogs. The major obstacle to the use of 1,25(OH)(2)D in patients therapeutically is the risk of hypercalcemia. Several maneuvers to reduce this risk, including pulse dosing and the use of less calcemic 1,25(OH)(2)D analogs, have been explored in Phase I-III clinical trials. Once merely a promise, vitamin D-based therapies for prostate cancer may soon be medical practice.

Improvement of cytotoxic effects induced by mitoxantrone on hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer cells by co-targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and hedgehog signaling cascades

The results of the present study revealed for the first time the possibility to use a combination of mitoxantrone with gefitinib and cyclopamine for inhibiting the growth of epidermal growth factor (EGF), sonic hedgehog- (SHHNp), and serum-stimulated androgen-sensitive LNCaP-C33 and androgen-independent (AI) LNCaP-C81, DU145 and PC3 prostate cancer (PC) cells. The supra-additive anti-proliferative effects of drugs were mediated via a blockade of the PC3 cells in the G(1) and G(2)M phases of the cell cycle. Importantly, the combination of mitoxantrone plus gefitinib and/or cyclopamine also caused a higher rate of apoptotic death of PC cells including enriched fraction of CD44(high) PC3 cell subpopulation as compared to the individual agents or bi-combination of drugs. The cytotoxic effects induced by mitoxantrone, gefitinib and cyclopamine on PC3 cells appear to be at least partly mediated through the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, release of cytochrome c into the cytosol, hydrogen peroxide production and activation of caspase cascades. These findings indicate that the simultaneous blockade of EGF-EGFR and sonic hedgehog tumorigenic signaling cascades may represent a promising strategy for improving the efficacy of current mitoxantrone-based therapies against incurable AI and metastatic PCs in the clinics.

Calcitriol and genistein actions to inhibit the prostaglandin pathway: potential combination therapy to treat prostate cancer

We present an overview of the prostaglandin (PG) pathway as a novel target for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) using a combination of calcitriol and genistein, both of which have known antiproliferative properties. Calcitriol inhibits the PG pathway in PCa cells in 3 separate ways: by decreasing cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression, stimulating 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) expression, and decreasing EP (PGE2) and FP (PGF(2alpha)) receptors. These actions of calcitriol result in reduced levels of biologically active PGE2, leading ultimately to growth inhibition of the PCa cells. We also demonstrate the advantages of using calcitriol in combination with genistein for the treatment of PCa. Genistein, a major component of soy, is a potent inhibitor of the activity of CYP24, the enzyme that initiates the degradation of calcitriol. This leads to increased half-life of bioactive calcitriol, thereby enhancing all of calcitriol's actions including those on the PG pathway. In addition to inhibiting CYP24 enzyme activity, genistein has its own independent actions on the PG pathway in PCa cells. Like calcitriol it inhibits COX-2 expression and activity, leading to decreased synthesis of PGE2. It also inhibits the EP and FP receptors, thereby reducing the biological function of PGE2. Thus, the combination of calcitriol and genistein acts additively to inhibit the PG pathway. Both calcitriol and genistein are relatively safe and have little toxicity associated with their intake. We postulate that the combination of calcitriol and genistein is an attractive therapeutic option for the treatment of PCa.

Abarelix for injectable suspension: first-in-class gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for prostate cancer

Abarelix, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, with its indication for advanced symptomatic prostate cancer, represents the newest category of hormonal therapy introduced in the past 15 years. Results from Phase II and III clinical trials demonstrate the advantages of abarelix over commonly used luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy: abarelix does not cause a surge in serum testosterone that can precipitate a flare phenomenon or worsening of disease, particularly dangerous for patients with metastatic, symptomatic disease, and produces medical castration more quickly. Abarelix was also demonstrated to promptly and substantially reduce follicle-stimulating hormone levels to lower than LHRH agonist. Study results demonstrate effective anticancer responses during extended exposure to abarelix: improvements in pain score and/or analgesic use, improvements in urinary symptoms (including urinary catheter removal) and complete avoidance of bilateral orchiectomy for patients undergoing at least 12 weeks of treatment. In Phase III clinical trials, abarelix demonstrated a similar overall safety profile when compared with LHRH agonist monotherapy, and a superior safety profile when compared with LHRH agonist plus antiandrogen combination therapy. Abarelix patients experienced a greater incidence of immediate-onset systemic allergic reactions as compared with control arms.

Quality of life and pain in advanced stage prostate cancer: results of a Southwest Oncology Group randomized trial comparing docetaxel and estramustine to mitoxantrone and prednisone

PURPOSE

Palliation of bone pain can be achieved in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer treated with docetaxel and estramustine (DE) or mitoxantrone and prednisone (MP). While Southwest Oncology Group trial 99-16 demonstrated a survival improvement of DE over MP, the study also was designed to compare the palliation of disease-related symptoms.

METHODS

Pain palliation and global quality of life (QOL) were the two primary patient-reported outcomes. Pain was measured with the Present Pain Intensity scale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and its Prostate Cancer Module (PR25) measured QOL and symptom status. Pain and analgesic use were measured at random assignment, every cycle for eight cycles, and 1 year from random assignment; the QLQ-C30 and the PR25 were administered at random assignment, before cycle four (week 10) and cycle eight (month 6) and at 1 year. In addition to the primary intent-to-treat, missing at random analysis, sensitivity analyses were performed to assess robustness of global QOL conclusions under alternative informative missing data assumptions.

RESULTS

Six hundred seventy four eligible patients received DE (n = 338) or MP (n = 336). In an intention-to-treat analysis, median overall survival was 17.5 months for the DE arm and 15.6 months for the MP arm (P = .02). There were no statistically significant differences in pain palliation between the treatment arms. The sensitivity analyses showed a consistent lack of statistically significant global QOL differences for the two arms.

CONCLUSION

DE had superior clinical efficacy (overall survival, time-to-progression, and prostate-specific antigen declines) with similar global QOL and pain palliation in the MP arm.

The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain control, twenty years of use. How much pain relief does one get from using it?

INTRODUCTION

Pain is a major problem in the treatment of patients with cancer. This article reviews studies concerning evaluation of patients with cancer pain treated according to The World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic search of PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, BDENF, and OVID and a hand search of reference lists and textbooks from 1982 to 2004 were performed.

RESULT

Analgesia was considered adequate in 45 to 100% of patients analyzed in the studies.

CONCLUSION

However, the evidence that they provide is insufficient to grant the effectiveness of the WHO guidelines because a controlled clinical trial of this intervention has never been published.

Role of Quality of Life in Men with Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer: How Does Atrasentan Influence Quality of Life?

OBJECTIVE

Progression of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is associated with skeletal complications and bone pain, which contribute to deterioration in quality of life (QOL). The effects of new HRPC therapies on patients' QOL need to be studied. Patient-based assessments that help quantify the risk-benefit profile of HRPC therapies are warranted. This review summarizes the known QOL literature and estimates the potential effect of atrasentan, a novel, selective endothelin A receptor antagonist (SERA), on the QOL of HRPC patients.

METHODS

Published studies were identified through a structured, detailed literature review. Clinical studies that report QOL data were reviewed, along with recent QOL data from atrasentan studies.

RESULTS

HRPC studies have begun to use QOL assessments as primary endpoints, but different assessments and therapies are not comparable. Very few data integrate QOL with clinical endpoints. Atrasentan clinical trials demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the prostate cancer-specific QOL in favor of atrasentan (p=.032) and an increased quality-adjusted time to progression in men with HRPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrasentan provides QOL benefits relevant to HRPC. The quality-adjusted analyses applied in the atrasentan studies have begun to lay the foundation for interpreting clinical endpoints in conjunction with QOL. These analyses will facilitate better QOL comparisons within studies and across trials. Further evaluation of atrasentan in HRPC is warranted.

The causes and consequences of cancer-associated malnutrition

Cancer-associated malnutrition can result from local effects of a tumour, the host response to the tumour and anticancer therapies. Although cancer patients often have reduced food intake (due to systemic effects of the disease, local tumour effects, psychological effects or adverse effects of treatment), alterations in nutrient metabolism and resting energy expenditure (REE) may also contribute to nutritional status. Several agents produced by the tumour directly, or systemically in response to the tumour, such as pro-inflammatory cytokines and hormones, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of malnutrition and cachexia. The consequences of malnutrition include impairment of immune functions, performance status, muscle function, and quality of life. In addition, responses to chemotherapy are decreased, chemotherapy-induced toxicity and complications are more frequent and severe, and survival times are shortened. Depression, fatigue and malaise also significantly impact on patient well-being. In addition, cancer-related malnutrition is associated with significant healthcare-related costs. Nutritional support, addressing the specific needs of this patient group, is required to help improve prognosis, and reduce the consequences of cancer-associated nutritional decline.

New standards in the chemotherapy of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is a major issue in Western countries and the second leading cause of cancer death in North American men. In the prostate-specific antigen era, most HRPCs are currently diagnosed in asymptomatic patients based on biochemical failure, with increasing demand for active treatment. Until recently, chemotherapy for HRPC patients was not considered a standard of care due to the absence of clear data evidencing an overall survival benefit. In fact, few Phase III studies conducted in the 1980s and early 1990s had documented a superiority over corticosteroids alone in terms of biochemical response (declines in serum prostate-specific antigen levels) and quality of life, but not survival. Due to their impact on pain control, mitoxantrone and prednisone were long considered the best regimen for symptomatic HRPC patients. In recent years, more chemotherapeutic agents have been tested, among which the microtubule inhibitors (vinca alkaloids and taxanes) have obtained the most promising results in Phase II trials and have entered Phase III testing. Two well-designed randomized trials have changed this scenario. Both compared docetaxel (with or without estramustine) against mitoxantrone and prednisone, and demonstrated a significant advantage not only in terms of response, pain control and quality of life, but also in terms of overall survival. Which patients need to be treated, the regimen of choice and duration of chemotherapy will be the next questions to be answered in the coming years in the field of HRPC, along with the role of new signal transduction inhibitors and other targeted therapies.

1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits prostate cancer cell invasion via modulation of selective proteases

Inhibition of invasion and metastasis has become a new approach for treatment of advanced prostate cancer in which secondary hormone therapy has failed. Accumulating evidence indicates that 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-VD) suppresses prostate cancer progression by inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying these effects remain to be determined. Here, we used the in vitro cell invasion assay to demonstrate that 1,25-VD inhibits the invasive ability of human prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP, PC-3 and DU 145. Three major groups of proteases, the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the plasminogen activators (PAs) and the cathepsins (CPs), that are involved in tumor invasion were then examined for changes in activity and expression after 1,25-VD treatment. We found that 1,25-VD decreased MMP-9 and CPs, but not PAs activities, while it increased the activity of their counterparts, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and cathepsin inhibitors. Mechanistic studies showed that 1,25-VD did not suppress MMP-9 expression at the transcriptional level, but reduced its mRNA stability. In addition, 1,25-VD increased AP-1 complexes binding to TIMP-1 promoter, which contributed to the enhancement of TIMP-1 activity, and thus resulted in inhibition of MMP activity and tumor invasion. These findings support the idea that vitamin D-based therapies might be beneficial in the management of advanced prostate cancer, especially among patients who have higher MMP-9 and CPs activities.

Designing a Randomized Phase I/II Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention Trial Using 1??-Hydroxy-24-Ethyl-Cholecalciferol, an Analogue of Vitamin D3

Prostate cancer continues to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality among older men. One possible means of reducing its impact on overall health and vitality is via cancer chemoprevention, both in the population that is unaffected but at some risk and in those who have undergone some form of curative therapy after the onset of the disease. Chemoprevention holds significant promise, but large phase III clinical trials evaluating chemopreventive agents in prostate cancer can require vast numbers of enrollees and require the commitment of significant financial resources and time before any therapeutic benefit may become apparent. One technique to shorten the time required for chemoprevention clinical trials is to use surrogate endpoint biomarkers in place of the currently used actual endpoints of cancer incidence or survival. The validation of such surrogate endpoint biomarkers will require small, well-designed phase I and/or II trials to accumulate data on the modulation of the surrogate biomarkers and the endpoints of cancer incidence or survival by the chemopreventive agent. Careful statistical correlation and clinical validation of the data will then allow us to justify the use such surrogates in place of the actual endpoint in large, randomized trials, potentially shortening trial duration, improving financial efficiency, and accelerating approval of the chemopreventive agent. To that end, we first review the theoretical construct of cancer chemoprevention trials with particular reference to prostate cancer. We thereafter describe the design of a small, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase I/II clinical trial of an analogue of vitamin D, vitamin D5, which we believe could serve as a model for data accumulation on surrogate biomarkers and correlation with other clinical endpoints.