Phase II trial of combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin given every 3 weeks to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

The efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus intravenous irinotecan, leucovorin and fluorouracil in colorectal cancer with inoperable hepatic metastasis

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) was evaluated for different drugs to treat hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC). Combination treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) is effective for CRC. A phase II study was conducted to evaluate concomitant HAI administration of oxaliplatin and intravenous leucovorin, 5-FU and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) for patients with inoperable liver metastasis, which had chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (OX) 85 mg/m(2) HAI plus systemic intravenous chemotherapy [leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) and irinotecan (IRI) 160 mg/m(2) in 48 hours]. We treated 24 patients. Neutropaenia was the most frequent toxicity. The main HAI-related toxicity was pain. Two patients (8%) obtained complete response and 17 patients (70%) partial response, giving an objective response rate of 78%. Median follow-up was 22.8 months, and median overall and disease-free survival times were 29 and 20 months, respectively. Therefore, OX HAI and intravenous FOLFIRI is feasible and effective in patients with metastatic CRC.

Multicenter phase-II trial of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin [IROX regimen] in patients with poor-prognosis cancer of unknown primary: a hellenic cooperative oncology group study

BACKGROUND

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) lacks established therapy although it affects 3% of cancer patients. We evaluated the irinotecan-oxaliplatin combination (IROX regimen) in previously untreated patients with non-favorable subsets of unknown primary carcinomas.

METHODS

This was a multicenter phase-II trial. Protocol treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 160 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks. The primary end points were response rate and toxicity, and secondary end points were time to progression and survival.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with liver, bone or multiple visceral metastases entered into the trial and received a median 6 chemotherapy cycles (1-11). The regimen was very well tolerated with one febrile neutropenia case and six cases with diarrhea grade 3 (16%). In intent-to-treat analysis the tumor response rate was 13% (95% CI = 4.8-25.7%) and 12 patients (27%, 95%CI 13.9-40.4%) had at least 4 months' duration of disease stabilization. The median time to progression was 2.7 months and the median survival was 9.5 months, with 40% of patients alive at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The IROX regimen demonstrated similar efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile compared to other more toxic chemotherapy combinations in patients with poor-prognosis CUP.

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin and irinotecan regimen every other week: a phase I/II study in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

A phase I/II study was performed to determine the safety and activity of a capecitabine plus oxaliplatin and irinotecan (COI) regimen using capecitabine concurrently with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received irinotecan on day 1, oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) on day 2 and capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily) on days 2-6 of a biweekly schedule. Three dose levels ranging from 150 to 180 mg/m(2) were explored for irinotecan in sequential cohorts of three to six patients. Once the recommended dose was determined, a total of 28 eligible patients were planned at this dose level.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients received a median of six cycles. The recommended phase II dose of irinotecan was 180 mg/m(2). Toxicity was manageable: the most common severe toxicities were diarrhoea (24%) and nausea (16%). Of 27 assessable patients treated at the recommended dose, 17 achieved a partial response (overall response rate (ORR) 63%; 95% confidece interval (CI), 44 to 78%), with eight patients undergoing liver metastasectomy. Estimated progression-free survival and overall median survival were 8.5 and 23.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly COI is feasible and active. Tolerability and ease of administration make the regimen well suited for downsizing hepatic colorectal metastases before curative surgery.

RFA for Liver Tumors: Does It Really Work?

The use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasing in the treatment of both primary and metastatic hepatic tumors. However, the role of RFA has yet to be clearly defined in patients who are still considered amenable to surgical intervention. Future prospective studies are needed to define whether RFA can be used as an alternative to surgery in certain patient populations. In the interim, radiofrequency ablation technology will continue to advance and serve as both a palliative and potentially curative intervention for individuals with hepatic tumors.