Role of diagnostic and ablative minimally invasive surgery for pediatric malignancies

The Role of Biopsy in the Workup of Patients with Neuroblastoma: Comparison of the Incidence of Surgical Complications and the Diagnostic Reliability of Diverse Techniques

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumor in childhood, accounting for approximately 15% of all cancer-related deaths in the pediatric population. The overall survival of children with high-risk disease is around 40-50% despite the aggressive treatment protocols. In accordance with the most recent guidelines, a complete classification of the primary tumor, including its histopathological and molecular analysis, is necessary. In this regard, the biopsy of the primary tumor is an important diagnostic procedure adopted not only to confirm the diagnosis but also for staging and risk stratification of the disease. In this study, the authors describe their unicentric experience with four different approaches adopted for sampling NB tumors: (i) the open incisional biopsy; (ii) the minimally invasive thoracoscopic/laparoscopic incisional biopsy; (iii) the ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy; (iv) the laparoscopic-assisted core needle biopsy. The benefits of each technique are analyzed along with their contraindications.

Pancreatoblastoma in children: EXPeRT/PARTNER diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations

Pancreatoblastoma (PBL) is a rare malignant epithelial neoplasm that affects typically young children. Signs related to advanced upper-abdominal tumor accompanied by elevated serum α-fetoprotein levels in a young child suggest PBL, however histopathological confirmation is mandatory. The mainstay of the treatment is a complete surgical resection. Unresectable and/or metastatic PBL may become amenable to complete delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This manuscript presents the international consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of children with PBL, established by the European Cooperative Study Group for Pediatric Rare Tumors (EXPeRT) within the EU-funded PARTNER (Paediatric Rare Tumors Network - European Registry) project.

The Role of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Oncology: Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

Aim: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been widely used in the last decades. Nevertheless, the pros and cons of thoracoscopy vs. open surgery in pediatric oncology are still under debate. In literature, VATS has been applied for both diagnostic and ablative surgery to treat neurogenic tumors, thymic neoplasms, lung tumors and metastases, germ cell tumors, lymphoproliferative diseases, and other rare tumors. Recent reviews described excellent outcomes in pediatric oncology as well as in the treatment of adult lung cancer, with a significantly higher rate of mortality and complication in thoracotomy compared to VATS. We reviewed our experience on thoracoscopy in pediatric malignancy and compared it to the literature. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort-study of pediatric oncological patients who underwent VATS at our institution from 2007 to 2020, and a review of the recent literature on the topic. Results: A total of 43 procedures were performed on 38 oncological patients (18 males, 20 females). Median age was years 7.72 (0.35-18.6). Diagnosis: 10 neurogenic tumors, nine hematological diseases, five metastases, four lypoblastomas, three thymic pathologies, three germ cell tumors, two pleuropneumoblastomas, two myofibroblastic tumors, one myoepithelial carcinoma, one liposarcoma, and three suspected oncological mass. In three cases, a 3D model was elaborated to better plan the surgical approach. Diagnostic biopsies were 22 (51.1%), and ablative surgeries, 21 (48.9%). One neurogenic tumor was resected with the Da Vinci Robot. Median operative time was 120 min (30-420). A drain was left in place in 20 (46.5%) for a median of 4 days. Median length of hospitalization was 5 days (1-18). One case (2.3%) was converted (intraoperative bleeding). There were three post-operative complications (7.0%): one pneumonia, one pleural effusion, and one diaphragmatic paralysis (need for plication). Results were compared to recent literature, and morbidity and conversion rate were comparable to reviewed publications. Conclusion: VATS represents a valuable tool for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in pediatric oncology. Nonetheless, it is a challenging technique that should be performed by expert surgeons on oncological and mini-invasive surgery. Three-dimensional reconstruction can optimize the pre-operative planning and guarantee a safer and more targeted treatment. Finally, the advent of robotics-assisted surgery represents a new challenge that may further implement the advantages of VATS.

Minimally invasive surgery for unilateral Wilms tumors: Multicenter retrospective analysis of 50 transperitoneal laparoscopic total nephrectomies

PURPOSE

To evaluate feasibility and outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in Wilms tumor (WT).

METHODS

International multicenter review of MIS total nephrectomies for WT between 2006 and 2018. Medical records of confirmed WT were retrospectively assessed for demographic, imaging, treatment, pathology, and oncological outcome data.

RESULTS

Fifty patients, with a median age of 38 months (6-181), were included in 10 centers. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as per SIOP protocol. Median tumor volume post-chemotherapy was 673 mL (18-3331), 16 tumors crossed the lateral border of the spine, and three crossed the midline. Six patients with tumors that crossed the lateral border of the spine (tumor volumes 1560 mL [299-2480]) were converted to an open approach. There was no intraoperative tumor rupture. Overall, MIS was completed in 19% of the 195 nephrectomies for WT presenting during the study period. Tumor was stage I in 29, II in 16, and III in 5, and histology was reported as low in three, intermediate in 42, and high risk in five. Three patients had positive tumor margins. After a median follow-up of 34 months (2-138), there were two local recurrences (both stage I, intermediate risk, 7 and 9 months after surgery) and one metastatic relapse (stage III, high risk, four months after surgery). The three-year event-free survival was 94%.

CONCLUSION

MIS is feasible in 20% of WT, with oncological outcomes comparable with open surgery, no intraoperative rupture, and a low rate of local relapse. Ongoing surveillance is, however, needed to evaluate this technique as it becomes widespread.

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Surgical Oncology: Practice Evolution at a Contemporary Single-Center Institution and a Guideline Proposal for a Randomized Controlled Study

Background: Despite the lack of randomized or controlled trials for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric surgical oncology, the integration of MIS into the surgical practice of pediatric oncology has become increasingly popular. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of MIS in a pediatric tertiary cancer center and compare present use of MIS to that in a previous analysis at our center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with pediatric cancer treated with MIS at a single institution between 2000 and 2014. Results: A total of 252 MIS procedures were performed: 73 laparoscopic (29%) and 179 thoracoscopic (71%). MIS was used for diagnostic purposes in 59% (146 thoracoscopic and 34 laparoscopic) and the therapeutic resection in 24% (39 laparoscopic cases and 33 thoracoscopic cases). Conversion to an open procedure occurred in 18 tumor resections (6%) and in 22 diagnostic biopsies (7%), mostly due to technical challenges in identifying or mobilizing tumors. Complications occurred in seven tumor resections (2%) and included three pneumothoraces, two bleeding complications, one bowel injury, and one wound infection. Complications occurred in 10 diagnostic biopsies (3%), mostly pneumothoraces. No tumor upstaging or trocar site recurrences occurred (follow-up time, 1-15 years). Conclusions: Over the last decade, we demonstrate the evolution of MIS in the management of solid tumors in children. We encourage surgeons and oncologists to join the call to arms to establish prospective trials evaluating MIS in pediatric surgical oncology.

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Surgical Oncology

The application of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to resect pediatric solid tumors offers the potential for reduced postoperative morbidity with smaller wounds, less pain, fewer surgical site infections, decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and less disruption to treatment regimens. However, significant controversy surrounds the question of whether a high-fidelity oncologic resection of childhood cancers can be achieved through MIS. This review outlines the diverse applications of MIS to treat pediatric malignancies, up to and including definitive resection. This work further summarizes the current evidence supporting the efficacy of MIS to accomplish a definitive, oncologic resection as well as appropriate patient selection criteria for the minimally invasive approach.

Minimally Invasive Approaches to Pediatric Solid Tumors

Over the last decade, driven in part by the favorable adult experience and a crescendoing number of case series and retrospective reports in the pediatric surgical literature, minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches are increasingly used as adjunctive or definitive surgical treatments for an ever-expanding list of pediatric tumors. Although most current treatment protocols lack surgical guidelines regarding the use of MIS, this growing body of MIS literature provides a framework for the development of multicenter trial groups, prospective registries, and further centralization of subspecialist services. This article highlights the current available data on MIS approaches to a variety of pediatric malignancies.

Maintaining oncologic integrity with minimally invasive resection of pediatric embryonal tumors

BACKGROUND

Embryonal tumors arise typically in infants and young children and are often massive at presentation. Operative resection is a cornerstone in the multimodal treatment of embryonal tumors but potentially disrupts therapeutic timelines. When used appropriately, minimally invasive surgery can minimize treatment delays. The oncologic integrity and safety attainable with minimally invasive resection of embryonal tumors, however, remains controversial.

METHODS

Query of the Vanderbilt Cancer Registry identified all children treated for intracavitary, embryonal tumors during a 15-year period. Tumors were assessed radiographically to measure volume (mL) and image-defined risk factors (neuroblastic tumors only) at time of diagnosis, and at preresection and postresection. Patient and tumor characteristics, perioperative details, and oncologic outcomes were compared between minimally invasive surgery and open resection of tumors of comparable size.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients were treated for 206 intracavitary embryonal tumors, of which 178 were resected either open (n = 152, 85%) or with minimally invasive surgery (n = 26, 15%). The 5-year, relapse-free, and overall survival were not significantly different after minimally invasive surgery or open resection of tumors having a volume less than 100 mL, corresponding to the largest resected with minimally invasive surgery (P = .249 and P = .124, respectively). No difference in margin status or lymph node sampling between the 2 operative approaches was detected (p = .333 and p = .070, respectively). Advantages associated with minimally invasive surgery were decreased blood loss (P < .001), decreased operating time (P = .002), and shorter hospital stay (P < .001). Characteristically, minimally invasive surgery was used for smaller volume and earlier stage neuroblastic tumors without image-defined risk factors.

CONCLUSION

When selected appropriately, minimally invasive resection of pediatric embryonal tumors, particularly neuroblastic tumors, provides acceptable oncologic integrity. Large tumor volume, small patient size, and image-defined risk factors may limit the broader applicability of minimally invasive surgery.

Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children: A Prospective Morbidity and Mortality Analysis Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification

There is a lack of information about evaluation of pediatric minimal access surgery complications; the Clavien-Dindo classification was never used for a large series of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic pediatric procedures. With a prospective Morbidity and Mortality database, all the minimal access surgical procedures carried out between 2012 and 2016 were included in this study. Statistical analyses were used to valuate modification of surgical techniques in to 2 periods (period 1: January 2012 to February 2014; period 2: February 2014 to February 2016). A total of 1374 minimal access procedures were performed on 1371 patients. The overall complication rate was 2.9%. No differences, in terms of complications, were observed between elective and emergency procedures (P=0.3). There was a significant difference between the complication rate of thoracoscopic surgery (P=0.027). These results provide the relevance of adequate recording system and standardized classification for analyses and reduction of complications for pediatric minimal access procedures.

Use of ultrasound in diagnosing postoperative small-bowel intussusception in pediatric surgical oncology patients: a single-center retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative intussusception can be a complication of abdominal surgery and often poses a diagnostic dilemma.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intussusception in children who had recently undergone resection of a primary solid tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all pediatric surgical oncology patients undergoing laparotomy for excision of an abdominal tumor at our institution from 1995 to 2015. We reviewed those with documented postoperative intussusception. In addition we searched the radiology database for all ultrasound examinations requested to rule out postoperative intussusception during our study interval. We analyzed demographics, primary diagnosis, surgical procedure, presentation, diagnostic investigations and definitive treatment.

RESULTS

At our institution 852 laparotomies for abdominal tumor resection were performed during the study period, resulting in 10 postoperative intussusceptions (1.2% of cases), of which half were following neuroblastoma resection and the other half following nephrectomy for Wilms tumor. Postoperative intussusception was suspected if the patient had increasing nasogastric output, abdominal distension or feeding intolerance. Ultrasound was used to diagnose intussusception in 9/10 cases, on postoperative day 6 (standard deviation [SD] 5.6 days) on average, with a sensitivity of 89% (8/9; one false negative; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52, 1.00) and a specificity of 100% (no false positives; 95% CI 0.96, 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound was highly accurate in diagnosing postoperative intussusception in children who underwent resection of retroperitoneal tumors.

Minimally Invasive Hepatobiliary Surgery

Comparative studies and large-scale case series that confirm the advantages of laparoscopy in children with hepatobiliary diseases are scarce, and the use of laparoscopy remains a matter of debate. This article reviews the current literature on the role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in pediatric patients with choledochal cyst, biliary atresia, gallbladder diseases, and hepatobiliary malignancies. Studies were identified through a search of the MEDLINE database. Laparoscopy may be beneficial for resection of choledochal cyst and cholecystectomy. However, more data are required before recommendations on the use of minimally invasive techniques for other hepatobiliary conditions can be published.

Pediatric oncologic endosurgery

Despite increasing popularity of minimal-invasive techniques in the pediatric population, their use in diagnosis and management of pediatric malignancy is still debated. Moreover, there is limited evidence to clarify this controversy due to low incidence of each individual type of pediatric tumor, huge diversity of the disease entity, heterogeneity of surgical technique, and lack of well-designed studies on pediatric oncologic minimal-invasive surgery. However, a rapid development of medical instruments and technologies accelerated the current trend toward less invasive surgery, including oncologic endosurgery. The aim of this article is to review current literatures about the application of the minimal-invasive approach for pediatric tumors and to give an overview of the current status, indications, individual techniques, and future perspectives.

Laparoscopic resection of neuroblastomas in low- to high-risk patients without image-defined risk factors is safe and feasible

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) might be considered for resecting neuroblastomas without image-defined risk factors (IDRFs); however, there are no studies comparing the outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopy in IDRF-negative patients. Thus, we investigated the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery and compared the two abovementioned approaches.

METHODS

To compare the effects of laparotomy with those of laparoscopy in patients with neuroblastomas without IDRFs, the following items were retrospectively compared: largest tumor dimension, volume of blood loss, time required to initiate postoperative feeding, locoregional recurrence rate, survival, etc.

RESULTS

Nine patients without IDRFs (three at low-to-medium risk and six at high risk) underwent laparotomy, and seven patients without IDRFs (two at low-to-medium risk and five at high risk) underwent laparoscopy. Median duration of surgery was 221 (130-304) and 172 (122-253) min in the laparotomy and laparoscopy groups, respectively, showing no significant difference. Median postoperative time required for resuming meal consumption was significantly longer in the laparotomy (4 days; 2-5) group than that in the laparoscopy group (3 days; 2-3; p = 0.023). Median blood loss was significantly higher in the laparotomy group (5 ml/Kg;2.6-16) than that in the laparoscopy group (2.1 ml/Kg;0.1-4.0; P = 0.037). Median follow-up period was 81 (52-94) and 21 (17-28) months, locoregional recurrence rates were 22 and 0% at 1 year, 1-year progression-free survival rates were 78 and 100%, and overall survival rates were 67 and 100% in the laparotomy and laparoscopy groups, respectively, with no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS for the treatment of neuroblastomas without IDRFs in low- to high-risk patients is safe and feasible and does not compromise the treatment outcome.

Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery

The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric patients has been steadily increasing in recent years. However, its use for diagnosing and treating abdominal tumors in children is still limited compared with adults, especially when malignancy is a matter of debate. Here, we describe the experience at our center with pediatric abdominal tumors to show the safety and feasibility of MIS.Based on a retrospective review of patient records, we selected for study those pediatric patients who had undergone diagnostic exploration or curative resection for abdominal tumors at a single center from January 2010 through August 2015.Diagnostic exploration for abdominal tumors was performed in 32 cases and curative resection in 173 cases (205 operations). MIS was performed in 11 cases of diagnostic exploration (34.4%) and 38 cases of curative resection (21.9%). The mean age of the children who underwent MIS was 6.09 ± 5.2 years. With regard to diagnostic exploration, patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were found to be similar for MIS and open surgery. With regard to curative resection, however, the mean age was significantly lower among the patients who underwent open surgery (4.21 ± 4.20 vs 6.02 ± 4.99 for MIS, P = 0.047), and the proportion of malignancies was significantly higher (80% vs 39.4% for MIS, P < 0.001). MIS compared favorably with open surgery with respect to the rate of recurrence (6.7% vs 35.1%, P = 0.035), the rate of intraoperative transfusions (34.2% vs 58.5%, P = 0.01), the median amount of blood transfused (14 vs 22 mL/kg, P = 0.001), and the mean number of hospital days (4.66 ± 2.36 vs 7.21 ± 5.09, P < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ significantly between the MIS and open surgery groups. The operation was converted to open surgery in 3 cases (27.2%) of diagnostic MIS and in 5 cases (13.1%) of curative MIS.MIS was found to be both feasible and effective for the diagnosis and curative treatment of pediatric abdominal tumors. However, to determine the surgical role and guidelines for MIS for each specific tumor, a multicenter prospective study with a long-term follow-up is warranted.

Laparoscopic treatment of adrenal masses in children: Report of two cases and review of literature

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become a common alternative to open surgery for the resection of adrenal lesions in adults: The advantages are to provide better exposure of the adrenal gland, diminish soft tissue dissection, decrease morbidity and postoperative pain; however, reporting on the laparoscopic adrenalectomy in paediatric patients has been limited. We present two cases of laparoscopic adrenalectomy performed at our institution in two children, for left adrenal neuroblastoma in a first patient with opsomyoclonus syndrome, and for a right incidentaloma in the second case. According to recent literature, our experience has demonstrated that the laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a feasible procedure in children with small, well-circumscribed adrenal masses: It can be used a safety to treat suspected benign and malignant adrenal masses in children, with minimal morbidity and short hospital stay. The lateral trans-peritoneal approach offers optimal visualisation and good outcomes in terms of minimal discomfort, rapid recovery and excellent cosmesis. However, in the paediatric field, the number of patients is limited, making the learning curve longer.

Development of Port-Site Metastases Following Thoracoscopic Resection of a Neuroblastoma

We report a 26-month-old female who developed port-site metastases of a neuroblastoma following minimally invasive thoracoscopic interventions. After diagnosis of an intrathoracic low-risk neuroblastoma and 6 months of observation, she developed respiratory problems. She subsequently underwent total resection of a locally progressive tumor via thoracoscopy. Six months later, she developed local relapse and subcutaneous metastases within the thoracic wall. These port-site metastases were most likely iatrogenic. After excision of metastases, the residual tumor responded well to salvage chemotherapy. The patient has remained in remission for over 4 years.

The role of minimally invasive surgery in pediatric solid tumors

During recent years, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become the standard approach for various operations in infants and children. MIS in pediatric thoracic and abdominal tumors is a controversial approach in the surgical management of childhood cancer. Meanwhile, more and more oncological biopsies and resections are being performed laparoscopically or thoracoscopically. Despite its increasing role in pediatric tumor surgery, the different national and international multicenter trial groups have not yet implemented MIS within guidelines and recommendations in most of the current treatment protocols. An increasing number of retrospective reports describes a potential role of MIS in the management of different pediatric oncological entities. Over the time, there has been a diverse development of this approach with regard to the different neoplasms. Nevertheless, there is a lack of prospective randomized trails assessing MIS. This still represents a requirement for evidence-based medicine and judging the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. The purpose of this state-of-the-art article is to review the current literature to describe the application of MIS in pediatric solid tumors.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an accepted surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of benign diseases. Presently, the use of MIS in patients with cancer is progressing. However, the role of MIS in children with solid neoplasms is less clear than it is in adults. Although the use of diagnostic MIS to obtain biopsy specimens for pathology is accepted in paediatric surgical oncology, there is limited evidence to support the use of MIS for the resection of malignancies. This review is the second update of a previously published Cochrane review.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain differences in outcome between the minimally invasive and open surgical approaches for the treatment of solid intra-abdominal or intra-thoracic neoplasms in children. The primary outcomes of interest are OS, EFS, port-site metastases and recurrence rate; the secondary outcome of interest is surgical morbidity.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE/PubMed (from 1966 to February 2014) and EMBASE/Ovid (from 1980 to February 2014) to identify relevant studies. In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and the conference proceedings of the International Society for Paediatric Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology from 2003 to 2013. On 1 May 2014 we scanned the ISRCTN Register (on www.controlled-trials.com), the National Institutes of Health register (on www.controlled-trials.com and www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (on www.apps.who.int/trialsearch) for ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing MIS to open surgery for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children (aged 0 to 18 years) were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors performed the study selection independently.

MAIN RESULTS

The literature search retrieved 542 references. After screening the titles and abstracts we excluded 534 references which clearly did not meet the inclusion criteria. We assessed eight full text studies for eligibility and all of these studies were excluded from the review because they were not RCTs or CCTs. These excluded studies included case series, retrospective chart reviews and retrospective cohort studies. The scanning of reference lists and conference proceedings did not identify any additional studies and no (ongoing trials) were identified by the searches of trial registries. No studies that met the inclusion criteria of this review were identified

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No RCTs or CCTs evaluating MIS for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children could be identified. The current evidence base informing the use of MIS in children with solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms is based on other study designs like case reports, retrospective chart reviews and cohort studies and should be interpreted with caution. Thus there is insufficient evidence to allow any definitive conclusions regarding the use of MIS in these patients. High quality RCTs comparing MIS to open surgery are required. To accomplish this, centres specialising in MIS in children should collaborate.

Minimally invasive surgery in the management of abdominal tumors in children

The application of minimally invasive surgical techniques to pediatric abdominal tumors is a controversial application towards the surgical management of childhood cancer. Although general pediatric surgeons practice minimally invasive surgery techniques in a vast array of abdominal cases, its role in pediatric oncology is still developing, with no consensus in North America about its use for pediatric solid abdominal tumors. The purposes of this article are to review the current literature about the use of minimally invasive surgery in pediatric abdominal oncology and to examine established indications, procedures and technologic advances.

Laparoscopic resection of adrenal neuroblastoma without image-defined risk factors: a prospective study on 21 consecutive pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Over the last 20 years MIS has progressively gained popularity in children with cancer. We therefore aimed at evaluating the safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) resection in a series of children affected by adrenal neuroblastoma (NB) presenting without Image-Defined Risk Factors (IDRFs).

METHODS

An Institutional protocol for MIS resection of adrenal NB in pediatric patients without IDRFs has been applied since 2008. Absence of IDRFs represented the main indication for MIS in NB, regardless of tumor size. All pediatric patients who underwent MIS for NB between January 2008 and May 2013 were included. Specific technical considerations, demographic data, and outcome have been recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients underwent MIS resection for IDRFs-negative adrenal NB. Nine of these patients experienced preoperative downgrading of IDRFs after chemotherapy. Radiological median diameter of the mass was 30 mm (range 10-83 mm). Median operative time was 90 min. Median hospital stay was 4 days. All patients were treated successfully, without serious intraoperative complications. One mild intraoperative hemorrhage occurred and was treated without the need for conversion to open surgery nor blood transfusion was required. No postoperative complications, including port-site or peritoneal metastases were experienced.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of MIS for the resection of adrenal NB without IDRFs in children. Pediatric surgeons dedicated to oncology should be aware of this alternative approach to open resection.

Minimally invasive surgery for pediatric tumors - current state of the art

During recent years, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become the standard approach for various operations in infants and children. This also holds true for surgery in children with solid tumors. Meanwhile, more and more oncological biopsies and resections are being performed laparoscopically or thoracoscopically. Despite its increasing role in pediatric tumor surgery, the different national and international multicenter trial groups have not yet implemented MIS within guidelines and recommendations in most of the current treatment protocols. An increasing number of reports describe a potential role of MIS in the different entities of pediatric surgical oncology. Over the time, there has been a diverse development of this approach with regard to the different neoplasms. The aim of this article is to give an overview and to describe the current state of the art of MIS in pediatric solid tumors.

Enthusiasm, evidence and ethics: the triple E of minimally invasive pediatric surgery

Minimally invasive techniques are applicable in more than 60% of abdominal and thoracic operations in children. Enthusiasts promoted these techniques for many years. However, level 1 evidence on advantages of minimally invasive surgery in children remains limited. Randomized controlled trials have been conducted for some types of procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy, fundoplication, pyloromyotomy, and inguinal hernia repair. The results of these studies confirm some advantages of minimally invasive surgery, but for most types of laparoscopic and all types of thoracoscopic procedures, such data remain to be established. This article also focuses on reports on complications and disadvantages which are relevant for final conclusions and recommendations. The ethical implications of the application of new techniques in children are also discussed. On the basis of evidence based data and ethical principles, minimally invasive techniques may be appropriately used in the future.

Intussusception as a presenting feature of Burkitt lymphoma: implications for management and outcome

PURPOSE

Intussusception is a recognised but unusual presenting feature of Burkitt lymphoma. We sought to identify the clinical features associated with intussusception in this setting, and assess the outcome following protocol directed chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective case note review was performed on patients treated for Burkitt lymphoma at our institution between 1976 and 2010. Cases presenting with intussusception were identified from hospital records and oncology database.

RESULTS

Fourteen of the 210 children seen with a diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma during the study period (6.7%) developed intussusception. Median age was 6.1 years (range 2.5-10.9). Twelve patients presented with recurrent abdominal pain, and two patients with a jaw mass associated with endemic Burkitt lymphoma. Nine patients underwent a right hemicolectomy with ileo-colic anastomosis, and five had segmental small-bowel resections. Three patients had bone marrow involvement at diagnosis, two of whom died. All patients received chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 6.07 years (range 0.1-28.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Small bowel lymphoma should be considered in children presenting with intussusception above the normal infantile peak age range. The presentation is often insidious, and complete obstruction may not be apparent. However, when surgically resected, the majority can achieve a good outcome with additional chemotherapy.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an accepted surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of benign diseases. Presently, the use of MIS in patients with cancer is progressing. However, the role of MIS in children with solid neoplasms is less clear than it is in adults. Diagnostic MIS to obtain biopsy specimens for pathology has been accepted as a technique in paediatric surgical oncology, but there is limited experience with the use of MIS for the resection of malignancies.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain the differences in outcome between the minimally invasive and open approach in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal neoplasms in children, regarding overall survival, event-free survival, port-site metastases, recurrence rate and surgical morbidity.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed (from 1966 to February 2011), EMBASE/Ovid (from 1980 to February 2011) and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1) with pre-specified terms. In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, conference proceedings and ongoing trial databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing MIS and open surgery for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children (aged 0 to 18 years).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors performed the study selection independently.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies that met the inclusion criteria of this review were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No RCTs or CCTs evaluating MIS in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children could be identified, therefore no definitive conclusions could be made about the effects of MIS in these patients. Based on the currently available evidence we are not able to give recommendations for the use of MIS in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children. More high quality studies (RCTs and/or CCTs) are needed. To accomplish this, centres specialising in MIS in children should collaborate.

Scope and limitations of minimal invasive surgery in practice of pediatric surgical oncology

Management of Solid tumors in children needs a comprehensive multimodality protocol based treatment plan. Open surgical removal of the tumors occurring in any of the sites such as abdomen, thorax, chest wall, HFN (head, face, neck), brain and extremities, is the option which has been traditionally practiced even in the present era and in most of the centers. Nevertheless with the advances in science and technology and with ever increasing usage and expertise of laparoscopy in children, it's application has extended to treatment of solid tumors in children. A review of the scope of such intervention as well as the limitations of minimal invasive surgery in this specialized field of pediatric surgery has been attempted in this article.

American Pediatric Surgical Association New Technology Committee review on video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for childhood cancer

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Although the use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques for children with cancer is being practiced by some, its role remains unclearly defined. The purpose of this review was to describe the current literature on MIS for thoracic and mediastinal lesions in children.

METHODS

We performed a literature search for English studies that evaluated MIS techniques for biopsy or resection in children with suspected or established cancer. Only studies with greater than 20 patients were included in the review.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included for review. Each represented institutional retrospective reviews of experience. Seven were single-institution studies, and 3 were multi-institutional. There were no prospective nor randomized identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on primarily retrospective and observational data, the use of MIS for children with cancer who have pulmonary and mediastinal lesions seems to be effective and safe. Ideally, prospective studies are needed to evaluate this further.

Cystoscopy assisted transvesical biopsy of prostatic rhabdomyosarcoma

The treatment of prostatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) depends on tumour stratification based on site and histology. An increasing range of cytogenetic, molecular, and immunohistochemistry studies are required. This is difficult to achieve using standard cystoscopic biopsies alone. We present a 5-year-old male, diagnosed with a prostatic RMS. He underwent cystoscopy to confirm the diagnosis and at the same time tissue was obtained for histology using laparoscopic graspers via a STEP Port inserted percutaneously into the apex of his bladder. Histology and cytogenetics confirmed an embryonal botryoid RMS for which he received chemotherapy followed by a radical prostatectomy for residual disease.

[Minimally invasive pediatric surgery]

In recent years minimally invasive surgical techniques in children have made substantial progress. The feasibility and safety of a wide spectrum of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures have been confirmed in numerous studies. Moreover, it was reported that minimally invasive pediatric surgery is associated with lower morbidity, a shorter hospital stay, lower costs, better cosmetics and clinical results similar to those achieved by open surgery. The present article reviews information on established as well as feasible but not yet established surgical procedures. The discussion of potential hemodynamic, respiratory and organ perfusion effects of the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum and the notation of special logistic aspects should support the reader in the process of decision-making to schedule infants and children for minimally invasive surgery.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an accepted surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of benign diseases. Presently, the use of MIS in patients with cancer is progressing. However, the role of MIS in children with solid neoplasms is less clear than it is in adults. Diagnostic MIS to obtain biopsy specimens for pathology has been accepted as a technique in paediatric surgical oncology, but there is limited experience with the use of MIS for the resection of malignancies.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain the differences in outcome between the minimally invasive and open approach in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal neoplasms in children, regarding overall survival, event-free survival, port-site metastases, recurrence rate and surgical morbidity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed (from 1966 to March 2008), EMBASE/Ovid (from 1980 to March 2008) and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 1) with pre-specified terms. In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, conference proceedings and ongoing trial databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing MIS and open surgery for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children (aged 0 to 18 years).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors performed the study selection independently.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies that met the inclusion criteria of this review were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No RCTs or CCTs evaluating MIS in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children could be identified, therefore no definitive conclusions could be made about the effects of MIS in these patients. Based on the currently available evidence we are not able to give recommendations for the use of MIS in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children. More high quality studies (RCTs and/or CCTs) are needed. To accomplish this, centres specialising in MIS in children should collaborate.

Carbon dioxide modifies the morphology and function of mesothelial cells and facilitates transepithelial neuroblastoma cell migration

BACKGROUND

The response of mesothelial cells to surgical trauma and bacterial contamination is poorly defined. We have recently shown that CO(2) pneumoperitoneum increases systemic metastasis of neuroblastoma cells in a murine model. Thus, we hypothesized that CO(2) alters the morphology and function of mesothelial cells and facilitates transmesothelial tumor cell migration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Murine mesothelial cells were exposed to 100% CO(2) and 5% CO(2) as control. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigations, as well as LPS-induced granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) production and mitochondrial activity (MTT assay) were measured. Transmesothelial migration of neuroblastoma cells (Neuro2a) was determined using a transwell chamber system.

RESULTS

CO(2) incubation was associated with a significant destruction of the microvillar formation in SEM. Migration studies showed that the barrier function of the mesothelial monolayer decreased. A significantly increased migration of neuroblastoma cells was identified after 100% CO(2) exposure (P < 0.05). Although the conversion of MTT as an indicator of mitochondrial activity was only slightly and not significantly reduced after CO(2) incubation, the release of G-CSF induced by LPS was completely blocked during the incubation with 100% CO(2) (P < 0.05). The capacity of G-CSF release recovered after the incubation.

CONCLUSION

We observed that peritoneal mesothelial cells lose their typical cell morphology by CO(2) incubation, which is accompanied by facilitated migration of neuroblastoma cells. Moreover, the synthesis of immunological factors is blocked, but this effect is not long lasting. These mechanisms may explain an increased metastasis rate of neuroblastoma cells after CO(2) pneumoperitoneum, which was recently observed in a murine model.

Prior thoracic surgery has a limited impact on the feasibility of consecutive thoracoscopy in children: a prospective study on 228 procedures

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the impact of prior thoracic surgery on consecutive ipsilateral thoracoscopic surgery in children.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 228 thoracic procedures, which were performed in 190 children (99 male,91 female; mean age, 5.1 years; range, 1 day to 18 years) over a 7-year period (January 2000 to August 2007).Of these, 137 were thoracoscopies and 91 conventional operations. A panel of pediatric pulmonologists, anesthetists,and pediatric surgeons decided whether a thoracoscopy or a conventional approach was indicated. The endpoints were conversion rate, intraoperative events, and complications in subsequent thoracoscopies with regard to the type of prior thoracic surgery. In addition, the reasons for exclusion from thorascopy of those patients,who had a previous thoracic operation, should be identified.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (14%) had prior ipsilateral thoracic surgery; 20 of these underwent thoracoscopy,12 after prior thoracotomy and 8 after prior thoracoscopy. The type of initial approach had no significant impact on the conversion rate of subsequent thoracoscopy (1/12 after thoracotomy vs. 0/8 after thoracoscopy; not significant). The conversion rate was not significantly different in patients with or without prior surgery (1/20 vs. 19/117; not significant). However, there was a higher number of reconstructive procedures in patients without prior surgery, which was reflected in conversions due to lack of overview (n 12), bleeding (n 3), tension during reconstruction of a diaphragmatic defect (n 2) and esophageal atresia (n 2), and intraoperative respiratory problems (n 1). Twelve patients with a prior operation underwent thoracotomy due to limited respiratory capacity (n 5), advanced tumor stage, prior sternotomy (n 6), and limited visibility, leading to conversion during initial thoracoscopy (n 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior thoracic operation has, independent of the initial approach, a limited impact on the feasibility of ipsilateral consecutive thoracoscopic surgery in children. The feasibility of thoracoscopy after prior operation is excellent.

Recent advances and controversies in pediatric laparoscopic surgery

Children represent a unique group of patients who are likely to greatly benefit from minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The promise of less postoperative pain, smaller scars, shorter hospital stays, and a faster return to school continues to drive growth in this area. The development of pediatric-specific techniques and documentation of improved outcomes form a critical gateway to widespread application of pediatric MIS. A brief perspective on current approaches to MIS for pediatric congenital and acquired disease is provided in this report. Technical departures from standardized adult MIS and the rationale for their modification are highlighted.

Prior thoracic surgery has a limited impact on the feasibility of consecutive thoracoscopy in children: a prospective study on 228 procedures

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the impact of prior thoracic surgery on consecutive ipsilateral thoracoscopic surgery in children.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 228 thoracic procedures, which were performed in 190 children (99 male,91 female; mean age, 5.1 years; range, 1 day to 18 years) over a 7-year period (January 2000 to August 2007).Of these, 137 were thoracoscopies and 91 conventional operations. A panel of pediatric pulmonologists, anesthetists,and pediatric surgeons decided whether a thoracoscopy or a conventional approach was indicated. The endpoints were conversion rate, intraoperative events, and complications in subsequent thoracoscopies with regard to the type of prior thoracic surgery. In addition, the reasons for exclusion from thorascopy of those patients,who had a previous thoracic operation, should be identified.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (14%) had prior ipsilateral thoracic surgery; 20 of these underwent thoracoscopy,12 after prior thoracotomy and 8 after prior thoracoscopy. The type of initial approach had no significant impact on the conversion rate of subsequent thoracoscopy (1/12 after thoracotomy vs. 0/8 after thoracoscopy; not significant). The conversion rate was not significantly different in patients with or without prior surgery (1/20 vs. 19/117; not significant). However, there was a higher number of reconstructive procedures in patients without prior surgery, which was reflected in conversions due to lack of overview (n 12), bleeding (n 3), tension during reconstruction of a diaphragmatic defect (n 2) and esophageal atresia (n 2), and intraoperative respiratory problems (n 1). Twelve patients with a prior operation underwent thoracotomy due to limited respiratory capacity (n 5), advanced tumor stage, prior sternotomy (n 6), and limited visibility, leading to conversion during initial thoracoscopy (n 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior thoracic operation has, independent of the initial approach, a limited impact on the feasibility of ipsilateral consecutive thoracoscopic surgery in children. The feasibility of thoracoscopy after prior operation is excellent.