A critical appraisal of conventional and investigational drug therapy in patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome and clonal eosinophilia

FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion-negative hypereosinophilic syndrome with uncommon cardiac involvement responding to imatinib treatment: A case report

Hypereosinophilic syndrome is a rare, chronic hematological disease characterized by a persistently elevated eosinophil count exceeding 1.5×10⁹/l, following the exclusion of other potential etiologies. The systemic involvement of the disease causes tissue damage through eosinophil infiltration, and may affect various organs; cardiac complications are observed in 50-60% of cases, which are predominately attributed to endomyocardial fibrosis. The treatment is based initially on determining the presence of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion. Patients with positive results for this mutation tend to achieve a complete response with imatinib treatment, which is thus the first line of treatment for this condition. However, patients who are negative for this mutation initially undergo treatment with corticosteroids. This study reports the case of a male 53-year-old patient diagnosed with hypereosinophilic syndrome in 2012, with negative results for the FIP1L1-PDGFRA mutation, and persistently high eosinophil levels, despite receiving the second line of standard treatment for this condition with hydroxyurea, and having already used corticosteroids without success. At the time of admission, the patient presented with acute decompensated heart failure due to severe mitral regurgitation, without any evidence of prior myocardial fibrosis or restrictive cardiomyopathy, and without suggestion of an associated ventricular hypertrophy. This clinical presentation is uncommon, as valvular involvement usually appears in the third stage of the development of cardiac involvement, and is usually associated with fibrosis and thrombotic events. Alternative therapeutic possibilities were evaluated due to the significant progression of the disease, and it was decided to attempt the use of imatinib, despite its use being preferably recommended for FIPIL1-PDGFRA-positive patients. The patient exhibited an evident and immediate response to imatinib, with normalization of the eosinophil count within 24 h of the first dose, which was maintained for at least the next 19 months. This clinical presentation is uncommon, as patients negative for FIPIL1-PDGFRA fusion do not frequently respond to imatinib treatment, and symptomatic heart failure usually appears in the third stage of disease progression.

Long-term follow-up of patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome treated with Alemtuzumab, an anti-CD52 antibody

BACKGROUND

Relapsing, refractory patients with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (I-HES) and chronic eosinophilic leukemia-not otherwise specified (CEL-NOS) do not have many effective, durable therapeutic options. Alemtuzumab, an anti-CD52 antibody, has been reported to be an effective therapy due to inherent expression of CD52 on eosinophils.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 12 patients treated with alemtuzumab at our center until 2012.

RESULTS

Ten (83%) of 12 patients achieved complete hematologic response (CHR) after a median of 1 week for a median duration of 66 weeks, with the elimination of disease-related symptoms; 2 patients achieved partial hematologic remission hematologic remission (PHR). Patients with CHR who received alemtuzumab maintenance (n = 5) had a significantly longer time to progression than those patients who were only observed (n = 5) (P = .01). Eleven patients relapsed (only one while on maintenance), and 6 were rechallenged with alemtuzumab. Five (83%) achieved second CHR after a median of 3.5 weeks, for a median duration of 123 weeks. Again, those given maintenance (n = 3) had a longer time to progression than those who were only observed (P = .04). Adverse effects were mostly related to infusion reactions and lymphopenia-related viral infections (despite antibiotic prophylaxis). One patient developed Epstein-Barr virus-related lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab is an effective treatment for patients with relapsed, refractory idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome and chronic eosinophilic leukemia-not otherwise specified, in terms of both CHR achievement (even after repeated rechallenges) and duration (particularly if provided as a maintenance therapy). Common adverse effects are related to infusion reactions and immunosuppression.

Pathogenesis and classification of eosinophil disorders: a review of recent developments in the field

Eosinophils and their products play an essential role in the pathogenesis of various reactive and neoplastic disorders. Depending on the underlying disease, molecular defect and involved cytokines, hypereosinophilia may develop and may lead to organ damage. In other patients, persistent eosinophilia is accompanied by typical clinical findings, but the causative role and impact of eosinophilia remain uncertain. For patients with eosinophil-mediated organ pathology, early therapeutic intervention with agents reducing eosinophil counts can be effective in limiting or preventing irreversible organ damage. Therefore, it is important to approach eosinophil disorders and related syndromes early by using established criteria, to perform all appropriate staging investigations, and to search for molecular targets of therapy. In this article, we review current concepts in the pathogenesis and evolution of eosinophilia and eosinophil-related organ damage in neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions. In addition, we discuss classifications of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes as well as diagnostic algorithms and standard treatment for various eosinophil-related disorders.

Contemporary consensus proposal on criteria and classification of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes

Eosinophilia is an important indicator of various neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions. Depending on the underlying disease and mechanisms, eosinophil infiltration can lead to organ dysfunction, clinical symptoms, or both. During the past 2 decades, several different classifications of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes have been proposed in various fields of medicine. Although criteria and definitions are, in part, overlapping, no global consensus has been presented to date. The Year 2011 Working Conference on Eosinophil Disorders and Syndromes was organized to update and refine the criteria and definitions for eosinophilic disorders and to merge prior classifications in a contemporary multidisciplinary schema. A panel of experts from the fields of immunology, allergy, hematology, and pathology contributed to this project. The expert group agreed on unifying terminologies and criteria and a classification that delineates various forms of hypereosinophilia, including primary and secondary variants based on specific hematologic and immunologic conditions, and various forms of the hypereosinophilic syndrome. For patients in whom no underlying disease or hypereosinophilic syndrome is found, the term hypereosinophilia of undetermined significance is introduced. The proposed novel criteria, definitions, and terminologies should assist in daily practice, as well as in the preparation and conduct of clinical trials.

Molecular and clinical rationale for therapeutic targeting of interleukin-5 and its receptor

Interleukin-5 is a Th2 homodimeric cytokine involved in the differentiation, maturation, migration, development, survival, trafficking and effector function of blood and local tissue eosinophils, in addition to basophils and mast cells. The IL-5 receptor (IL-5R) consists of an IL-5-specific α subunit that interacts in conformationally dynamic ways with the receptor's βc subunit, an aggregate of domains it shares with binding sites of IL-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. IL-5 and IL-5R drive allergic and inflammatory immune responses characterizing numerous diseases, such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases, hyper-eosinophilic syndrome, Churg-Strauss syndrome and eosinophilic nasal polyposis. Although corticosteroid therapy is the primary treatment for these diseases, a substantial number of patients exhibit incomplete responses and suffer side-effects. Two monoclonal antibodies have been designed to neutralize IL-5 (mepolizumab and reslizumab). Both antibodies have demonstrated the ability to reduce blood and tissue eosinophil counts. One additional monoclonal antibody, benralizumab (MEDI-563), has been developed to target IL-5R and attenuate eosinophilia through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. All three monoclonal antibodies are being clinically evaluated. Antisense oligonucleotide technology targeting the common βc IL-5R subunit is also being used therapeutically to inhibit IL-5-mediated effects (TPI ASM8). Small interfering RNA technology has also been used therapeutically to inhibit the expression of IL-5 in animal models. This review summarizes the structural interactions between IL-5 and IL-5R and the functional consequences of such interactions, and describes the pre-clinical and clinical evidence supporting IL-5R as a therapeutic target.

Nilotinib: evaluation and analysis of its role in chronic myeloid leukemia

Nilotinib, formally known as AMN107, is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, rationally designed from its revolutionary parent compound imatinib, to produce a 30–40-fold enhancement in the inhibition of the BCR–ABL1-derived oncoprotein associated with chronic myeloid leukemia. In clinical trials, nilotinib has proven to be a useful agent in the treatment of imatinib-refractory disease and was initially approved by both the US FDA and EMA in 2007 for use in adults as a second-line therapy. More recently, data from the first randomized controlled trials of the front-line use of nilotinib in newly diagnosed patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia have demonstrated superiority in the rates of major molecular responses at 12 months over the gold standard–imatinib 400 mg. As such, in June 2010, the FDA granted accelerated approval for its use in newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia. Nilotinib is well tolerated, with a favorable side-effect profile. With the emergence of supportive trial data, it is likely to have a leading role both in the front-line management of newly presenting patients and in the second-line treatment of patients resistant to or intolerant of imatinib and other second-line agents.

Current strategies in the management of hypereosinophilic syndrome, including mepolizumab

BACKGROUND

Patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) vary considerably in their clinical presentation with regard to the severity and pattern of end-organ involvement. Clinical manifestations range from nonspecific symptoms to life-threatening, multisystem damage caused by eosinophil infiltration and local release of proinflammatory mediators and toxic granule products from these invading cells. The primary objective of treatment is to reduce blood and tissue eosinophilia and prevent eosinophil-mediated tissue damage as safely as possible. Systemic corticosteroids, such as prednisone, are first-line therapy for the management of patients with symptomatic HES who lack the Fip1-like 1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha (FIP1L1-PDGFRA) gene fusion mutation. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, is first-line treatment for FIP1L1-PDGFRA-positive patients). Because of the toxicity and serious side-effects that can occur with oral corticosteroids, alternative therapies may need to be introduced to reduce the cumulative corticosteroid exposure while maintaining disease control.

SCOPE

Among corticosteroid-sparing agents are cytotoxic drugs and interferon-alpha; anti-interleukin-5 (IL-5) monoclonal antibodies are also currently under investigation for the treatment of HES. This manuscript reviews the available treatments for HES and the range of side-effects associated with long-term corticosteroid use, and then focuses on the anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies, mepolizumab and reslizumab. Of these, only mepolizumab has been studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Literature search methodology utilized www.pubmed.gov and www.clinicaltrials.gov with search terms including hypereosinophilic syndrome and corticosteroid side-effects coupled with search terms including eosinophils, mepolizumab and reslizumab through March 2010.

FINDINGS

Three case studies are presented that demonstrate the limitations of corticosteroid therapy in terms of tolerability and quality of life, and the subsequent use of mepolizumab as a corticosteroid-sparing agent in these individuals.

CONCLUSION

Targeted eosinophil-directed therapy with an anti-IL-5 neutralizing monoclonal antibody reduced the need for corticosteroids in these three HES patients without disease exacerbations.

A review of treatment with mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 mAb, in hypereosinophilic syndromes and asthma

The hypereosinophilic syndromes (HESs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by peripheral blood eosinophilia with end-organ damage and varying in severity from nonspecific symptoms to life-threatening. Treatment objectives are a safe reduction of blood and tissue eosinophil levels and prevention of eosinophil-mediated tissue damage. Current treatment of patients with HESs, who lack the FIP-1-like 1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (FIP1L1-PDGFRA) fusion gene, is mainly systemic corticosteroid therapy. Eosinophil development from hematopoietic progenitor cells is regulated by IL-5, which influences maturation, differentiation, mobilization, activation, and survival. Consequently, inhibiting IL-5 is a logical therapeutic objective for patients with HESs or selected patients with asthma. Mepolizumab is a fully humanized anti-IL-5 monoclonal IgG(1) antibody that binds to free IL-5 with high affinity and specificity to prevent IL-5 from associating with the IL-5 receptor complex alpha-chain on the surface of eosinophils. In clinical trials with patients with HESs, mepolizumab reduced blood eosinophil counts and the maintenance corticosteroid dose and had no major safety concerns. Mepolizumab reduced airway and blood eosinophils and prevented asthma exacerbations. Thus, mepolizumab may be effective for long-term treatment of patients with selected eosinophilic disorders.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome in an atopic patient

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a rare, heterogeneous group of systemic diseases characterized by sustained overproduction of eosinophils leading to variable end-organ damage. The skin is affected in 45-60% of patients and may be of diagnostic and prognostic value. In 1975, three criteria were suggested for the diagnosis of HES: (i) blood eosinophilia of > 1.5 x 10(9)/L present for > 6 months, (ii) no apparent cause for the hypereosinophilia, and (iii) signs of end-organ dysfunction. We present a patient with hypereosinophilia in whom a delay in diagnosing HES occurred, partly due to his atopic constitution. However, atopy is not associated with such high or longstanding eosinophilia.

Alemtuzumab therapy for hypereosinophilic syndrome and chronic eosinophilic leukemia

PURPOSE

Patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) or chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) that are refractory to standard therapies are difficult to manage and have significantly shortened life expectancy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

CD52 is a surface glycoprotein highly expressed on eosinophils. We treated 11 patients with advanced HES/CEL with alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody. Alemtuzumab was administered, in general, first in escalating doses (5, 10, 30 mg i.v. on days 1-3), then at the tolerated dose thrice per week for a total of 12 doses. Patients with complete hematologic response (CHR; normal percent and absolute eosinophil count) were allowed to continue therapy once weekly as maintenance.

RESULTS

Ten patients (91%) achieved CHR after a median of 2 weeks (0.5-5 weeks) of therapy. Bone marrow eosinophilia resolved in four of seven evaluable patients. The median duration of CHR was 3 months (1.5-17+ months). Seven of the 10 CHR patients relapsed, five while off-therapy. Two patients achieved second CHR upon alemtuzumab rechallenge. Three patients experienced mild infusion-related symptoms, two developed cytomegalovirus reactivation requiring therapy, and one developed orbital lymphoma that was successfully treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our limited experience suggests alemtuzumab to be a valuable therapy for advanced HES or CEL, refractory to standard therapies, and supports the clinical evaluation of alemtuzumab in a larger trial.

The hypereosinophilic syndromes: current concepts and treatments

The hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) encompass a spectrum of diseases that have increased blood eosinophils and tissue damage in common. The clinical manifestations are protean and may involve any organ system, but especially the skin. Our understanding of these diseases has drastically changed over the past 15 years, along with new classifications that characterize patients with marked eosinophilia. One HES variant, myeloproliferative, is actually chronic eosinophilic leukaemia with a unique genetic marker, FIP1L1-PDGFRA. Such patients are well-controlled by administration of the kinase inhibitor, imatinib, and remissions appear durable with continued imatinib therapy. FIP1L1-PDGFRA is expressed in several cell lineages, thus explaining increases in neutrophils and mast cells in HES. The lymphocytic HES variant is associated with T-cell clones producing interleukin-5 (IL-5) and can evolve into lymphoma. While myeloproliferative and lymphocytic HES are well established and permit elimination of the term, idiopathic, to these varieties, most HES patients do not fall into these categories and are classified as complex (using the 2006 Workshop Report). A recent study showed that a monoclonal antibody to IL-5, mepolizumab, reduced glucocorticoid therapy in HES patients who did not possess the FIP1L1-PDGFRA mutation while controlling eosinophilia and preventing recurrence or progression of tissue damage. These advances augur well for continued progress in the understanding and treatment of HES.

Pathogenesis, classification, and therapy of eosinophilia and eosinophil disorders

Eosinophilia is a recurrent feature and diagnostic clue in several hematologic malignancies. In stem cell- and myelopoietic neoplasms, eosinophils are derived from the malignant clone, whereas in lymphoid neoplasms and reactive states, eosinophilia is usually triggered by eosinopoietic cytokines. Myeloid neoplasms typically presenting with eosinophilia include chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL), other myeloproliferative neoplasms, some acute leukemias, advanced mast cell disorders, and rare forms of myelodysplastic syndromes. Diagnostic evaluations in unexplained eosinophilia have to take these diagnoses into account. In such patients, a thorough hematologic work-up including bone marrow histology and immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, molecular markers, and a complete staging of potentially affected organ systems has to be initiated. Endomyocardial fibrosis, the most dangerous cardiovascular complication of the hypereosinophilic state, is frequently detected in PDGFR-mutated neoplasms, specifically in FIP1L1/PDGFRA+ CEL, but is usually not seen in other myeloid neoplasms or reactive eosinophilia, even if eosinophilia is recorded for many years. Treatment of hypereosinophilic patients depends on the variant of disease, presence of end organ damage, molecular targets, and the overall situation in each case. In a group of patients, oncogenic tyrosine kinases (TK) such as FIP1L1/PDGFRA, can be employed as therapeutic targets by using imatinib or other TK-blocking agents.

Successful treatment of myeloid neoplasms associated with PDGFRA rearrangement with imatinib mesylate

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) constitute a rare and heterogeneous group of disorders, defined as persistent and marked blood eosinophilia associated with evidence of eosinophil-induced organ damage. Cardiac dysfunction is the most frequent result of end-organ damage and is the major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with HES. Despite patients with FIP1-like-1-platelet-derived growth factor alpha (FIP1L1-PDGFRA) associated HES (myeloid neoplasms associated with PDGFRA rearrangement) have been shown to respond to low-dose imatinib with a complete and durable hematological and cytogenetic remission, influences of imatinib on clinical manifestations related to hypereosinophilia heart involvement are variable. Here we describe the case of a young male patient with severe heart involvement who had a prompt, clinical and hematological complete remission following administration of imatinib. However, as endomyocardial fibrosis and related loss of function are deteriorated after initiation of imatinib therapy, valvular replacement and tricuspid annuloplasty had to perform to restore his heart function. Our finding concurs with recent reports that severe heart involvement was irreversible with imatinib treatment.

Phase II study of dasatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute and chronic myeloid diseases, including systemic mastocytosis

PURPOSE

Molecular characterization of Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) chronic myeloproliferative disorders, such as systemic mastocytosis (SM), has provided a clear rationale for investigating novel targeted therapies. The tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor dasatinib is 325-fold more potent against Bcr-Abl TK than imatinib in vitro, significantly inhibiting wild-type KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta TKs, and is active against cells carrying the mutant KIT-D816V gene.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this phase 2, open-label study, the efficacy of dasatinib (140 mg/d) was investigated in 67 patients with various Ph- myeloid disorders, including SM (n = 33; 28 KIT-D816V positive).

RESULTS

The overall response rate to dasatinib in patients with SM was 33%. Only two patients, one with SM-myelofibrosis and one with SM-chronic eosinophilic leukemia, achieved complete response (elimination of mastocytosis) lasting for 5 and 16 months, respectively. Both patients were negative for KIT-D816V mutation, had low tryptase levels, abnormal WBC counts, and anemia, and had failed prior therapy with erythropoietin. Additional nine SM patients had symptomatic response, lasting 3 to 18+ months. Complete responses were achieved in two other patients (acute myeloid leukemia and hypereosinophilic syndrome). No responses were observed among patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and primary myelofibrosis. The majority of adverse events were grade 1/2.

CONCLUSION

These data show that dasatinib therapy may benefit a selected group of SM patients, primarily by improving their symptoms, but it does not eliminate the disease in the patients with KIT-D816V mutation.

Current status of antivascular therapy and targeted treatment in the clinic

Antivascular and targeted therapy are now an integrated part of the treatment of myelogenous leukemias, GIST tumours, B-cell lymphomas and breast cancer. In various malignancies improved responses and prolongation of survival for several months is regularly reported. The progress in this field is relevant for hyperthermia. Heat has among other effects documented antivascular effects, and can be considered as one of the established methods in the field based on several randomised phase III studies. Hyperthermia should be considered for combination with other antiangiogenic agents.

Management of hypereosinophilic syndrome: a prospective study in the era of molecular genetics

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by unexplained persistent primary eosinophilia causing end-organ damage. We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for HES. Of 20 patients considered eligible for the study, 2 were found to have clonal myeloid disorders, limiting the diagnosis of "true" HES to 18 patients. No patient carried the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene or other imatinib-responsive translocations. A clonal interleukin-5-producing T-cell population was not detected in any patient. Common manifestations at presentation were pulmonary, cutaneous, and neurologic involvement; serositis; and gastrointestinal involvement. Only 3 patients developed cardiac involvement. Fifteen of the HES patients were administered first-line combined treatment with steroids and hydroxyurea. Nine patients achieved complete response, while 6 attained only partial response. Imatinib was administered to 3 HES patients who had been pretreated with steroids, resulting in complete hematologic and clinical response in 2 patients and no response at all in 1. Further treatment of the latter patient with steroids and hydroxyurea also proved ineffective. We conclude that the therapeutic approach should be individualized according to molecular findings. We consider the coadministration of corticosteroids and hydroxyurea to be an effective combination for the treatment of FIP1L1-PDGFRA-negative HES.