Establishing treatment benchmarks for mammography-screened breast cancer population based on a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines

Rates of adherence to cancer treatment guidelines in Australia and the factors associated with adherence: A systematic review

Adherence to cancer treatment clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) varies enormously across Australia, despite being associated with improved patient outcomes. This systematic review aims to characterize adherence rates to active-cancer treatment CPGs in Australia and related factors to inform future implementation strategies. Five databases were systematically searched, abstracts were screened for eligibility, a full-text review and critical appraisal of eligible studies performed, and data extracted. A narrative synthesis of factors associated with adherence was conducted, and the median adherence rates within cancer streams calculated. A total of 21,031 abstracts were identified. After duplicates were removed, abstracts screened, and full texts reviewed, 20 studies focused on adherence to active-cancer treatment CPGs were included. Overall adherence rates ranged from 29% to 100%. Receipt of guideline recommended treatments was higher for patients who were younger (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], colorectal, lung, and breast cancer); female (breast and lung cancer), and male (DLBCL and colorectal cancer); never smokers (DLBCL and lung cancer); non-Indigenous Australians (cervical and lung cancer); with less advanced stage disease (colorectal, lung, and cervical cancer), without comorbidities (DLBCL, colorectal, and lung cancer); with good-excellent Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (lung cancer); living in moderately accessible places (colon cancer); and; treated in metropolitan facilities (DLBLC, breast and colon cancer). This review characterized active-cancer treatment CPG adherence rates and associated factors in Australia. Future targeted CPG implementation strategies should account for these factors, to redress unwarranted variation particularly in vulnerable populations, and improve patient outcomes (Prospero number: CRD42020222962).

Evidence-based benchmarks for use of cancer surgery in high-income countries: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Estimating a population-level benchmark rate for use of surgery in the management of cancer helps to identify treatment gaps, estimate the survival impact of such gaps, and benchmark the workforce and other resources, including budgets, required to meet service needs. A population-based benchmark for use of surgery in high-income settings to inform policy makers and service provision has not been developed but was recommended by the Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery. We aimed to develop and validate a cancer surgery benchmarking model.

METHODS

We examined the latest clinical guidelines from high-income countries (Australia, the UK, the EU, the USA, and Canada) and mapped surgical treatment pathways for 30 malignant cancer sites (19 individual sites and 11 grouped as other cancers) that were notifiable in Australia in 2014, broadly reflecting contemporary high-income models of care. The optimal use of surgery was considered as an indication for surgery where surgery is the treatment of choice for a given clinical scenario. Population-based epidemiological data, such as cancer stage, tumour characteristics, and fitness for surgery, were derived from Australia and other similar high-income settings for 2017. The probabilities across the clinical pathways of each cancer were multiplied and added together to estimate the population-level benchmark rates of cancer surgery, and further validated with the comparisons of observed rates of cancer surgery in the South Western Sydney Local Health District in 2006-12. Univariable and multivariable sensitivity analyses were done to explore uncertainty around model inputs, with mean (95% CI) benchmark surgery rates estimated on the basis of 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations.

FINDINGS

Surgical treatment was indicated in 58% (95% CI 57-59) of newly diagnosed patients with cancer in Australia in 2014 at least once during the course of their treatment, but varied by site from 23% (17-27) for prostate cancer to 99% (96-99) for testicular cancer. Observed cancer surgery rates in South Western Sydney were comparable to the benchmarks for most cancers, but were higher for some cancers, such as prostate (absolute increase of 29%) and lower for others, such as lung (-14%).

INTERPRETATION

The model provides a new template for high-income and emerging economies to rationally plan and assess their cancer surgery provision. There are differences in modelled versus observed surgery rates for some cancers, requiring more in-depth analysis of the observed differences.

FUNDING

University of New South Wales Scientia Scholarship, UK Research and Innovation-Global Challenges Research Fund.

Short- and Long-Term (10-year) Results of an Organized, Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening Program: Comparative, Observational Study from Hungary

BACKGROUND

A nationwide breast cancer screening program was introduced in Hungary in the year 2002 for women aged 45-65 years to be performed biannually.

METHODS

To investigate and report the short-term and 10-year follow-up results, we analyzed our Breast Unit's prospectively led database of screened (Group A) and age-matched symptomatic (Group B) patients from 2002 to 2007. We compared the clinicopathologic features of tumors and the impact of screening on surgical treatment, as well as the overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of different groups.

RESULTS

Data from 208 screen-detected and 101 symptomatic patients between 45 and 65 years of age were examined. Screen-detected women were younger (54 vs. 58.5 years; p = 0.001) had significantly smaller tumors (15.5 vs. 17 mm; p = 0.044), and more breast-conserving surgery (68.8 vs. 59.4%; p = 0.032). Survival statistics were not statistically different at the median follow-up of 123 months; however, there was a trend toward improved DFS in Group A (82.7 vs. 74.3%; p = 0.074).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed a significant reduction in rates of mastectomy in the screen-detected group in the short term, which does not translate into better survival rates based on initial long-term data. In order to realize the real advantage of this newly enstated screening program, a longer period of investigation is needed.

Synoptic operative record for point of care outcomes: a leap forward in knowledge translation

INTRODUCTION

Modern information technology coupled with synoptic methodology allows point of care, real time outcomes generation. Our objective was to review province-wide breast cancer surgery outcomes from a prospective synoptic operative record to demonstrate its value in knowledge translation.

METHODS

All synoptic reports for breast cancer procedures from 2006 until March 2010 were reviewed and descriptively analyzed. Key outcomes included frequency of breast cancer procedures captured over time, methods of breast cancer detection, clinical staging, method of axillary staging, breast conservation and reconstruction rates. Further analysis involved important decision-making for mastectomy and resource allocation for surgery.

RESULTS

Four thousand nine hundred fifty-five breast cancer procedures were recorded synoptically; greater than 80% of cases provincially. Method of breast cancer detection was 49%, 45% and 4% by screening radiology, patient or family, and physician, respectively. Pathologic diagnoses were via core or mammotome biopsy in 94%; nearly half of all patients were clinical Stage I at time of operation. Overall rate of breast conservation was 48%. Of the 65% who had no contra-indication to breast conservation surgery, 76% had breast conservation and 4% had primary reconstruction. Of those having mastectomy, one third were due to patient choice. Seventy-nine percent had sentinel node staging, 18% had full axillary dissection and 3% had no axillary staging.

CONCLUSION

A new paradigm of creating medical records using synoptic electronic templates allows prospective outcomes generation at point of care by the surgeon which is unparalleled in its depth of surgical detail capturing surgical decision-making.

Estimation of an evidence-based benchmark for the optimal endocrine therapy utilization rate in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

There are no evidence-based benchmarks to establish optimal rates of use of endocrine therapy in the whole breast cancer population. Reported utilization rates vary widely. The aim of the study was to estimate the optimal proportion of breast cancer patients who should receive endocrine therapy based on treatment guideline recommendations and to compare this with actual treatment rates.

METHODS

An optimal endocrine therapy utilization tree was constructed based on indications from evidence-based treatment guidelines. Frequency data on patient and tumour attributes were obtained from Australian cancer registries where possible and merged with the guideline recommendations to calculate the optimal utilization rate. These were compared with actual proportions obtained from published reports.

RESULTS

According to the best available evidence, the proportion of invasive breast cancer patients in whom endocrine therapy is indicated at diagnosis is 67%. Endocrine therapy is under-utilized in Australia (actual utilization rate 41%), and USA (35%), but approximate the benchmark rate in the UK (75%) and Italy (63%).

CONCLUSION

This evidence-based model provides a benchmark for optimal endocrine therapy utilization rates in the breast cancer population, and comparison of best practice evidence and actual treatment. The results show an underutilization of endocrine therapy in Australia and the USA, with more appropriate utilization in the UK and Italy.