1
|
Wilcox JA, Chukwueke UN, Ahn MJ, Aizer AA, Bale TA, Brandsma D, Brastianos PK, Chang S, Daras M, Forsyth P, Garzia L, Glantz M, Oliva ICG, Kumthekar P, Le Rhun E, Nagpal S, O'Brien B, Pentsova E, Lee EQ, Remsik J, Rudà R, Smalley I, Taylor MD, Weller M, Wefel J, Yang JT, Young RJ, Wen PY, Boire AA. Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: A SNO and ASCO consensus review on clinical management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2024:noae103. [PMID: 38902944 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases are increasingly becoming recognized as a treatable, yet generally incurable, complication of advanced cancer. As modern cancer therapeutics have prolonged the lives of patients with metastatic cancer, specifically in patients with parenchymal brain metastases, treatment options and clinical research protocols for patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors have similarly evolved to improve survival within specific populations. Recent expansion in clinical investigation, early diagnosis, and drug development have given rise to new unanswered questions. These include leptomeningeal metastasis biology and preferred animal modeling, epidemiology in the modern cancer population, ensuring validation and accessibility of newer leptomeningeal metastasis diagnostics, best clinical practices with multi-modality treatment options, clinical trial design and standardization of response assessments, and avenues worthy of further research. An international group of multi-disciplinary experts in the research and management of leptomeningeal metastases, supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, were assembled to reach a consensus opinion on these pressing topics and provide a roadmap for future directions. Our hope is that these recommendations will accelerate collaboration and progress in the field of leptomeningeal metastases and serve as a platform for further discussion and patient advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tejus A Bale
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dieta Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of San Francisco California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mariza Daras
- Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Peter Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Livia Garzia
- Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Glantz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- The Lou and Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Barbara O'Brien
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elena Pentsova
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eudocia Quant Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jan Remsik
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Laboratory for Immunology of Metastatic Ecosystems, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto and Treviso Hospitals, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
| | - Inna Smalley
- Department of Tumor Biology, The Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael D Taylor
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA Neuro-oncology Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jeffrey Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adrienne A Boire
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Bernardi A, Bachelot T, Larrouquère L. Long-term response to sequential anti-HER2 therapies including trastuzumab-deruxtecan in a patient with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastases: a case report and review of the literature. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1210873. [PMID: 38269026 PMCID: PMC10806069 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1210873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) is increasing among breast cancer patients, but their prognosis remains dismal. Many therapeutic options are now available to treat HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) involving the central nervous system (CNS). This case report illustrates a long-lasting response of more than 2 years in a patient with HER2+ MBC with LM after sequential administration of systemic and intrathecal (IT) anti-HER2 therapies and highlights that an appropriate treatment of HER2+ LM can result in durable survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel de Bernardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Cancer Reseach Center of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Louis Larrouquère
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Cancer Reseach Center of Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bardhan M, Dey D, Suresh V, Javed B, Venur VA, Joe N, Kalidindi R, Ozair A, Khan M, Mahtani R, Lo S, Odia Y, Ahluwalia MS. An overview of the therapeutic strategies for neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer: when and why? Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:77-103. [PMID: 38145503 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2293223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options. AREAS COVERED This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer. EXPERT OPINION Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mainak Bardhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Vinay Suresh
- King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Binish Javed
- Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Vyshak Alva Venur
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Neha Joe
- St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - Ahmad Ozair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Reshma Mahtani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Simon Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yazmin Odia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marowsky M, Müller V, Schmalfeldt B, Riecke K, Witzel I, Laakmann E. Intrathecal Therapy Options for Meningeal Carcinomatosis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2024; 84:59-67. [PMID: 38205044 PMCID: PMC10781578 DOI: 10.1055/a-2185-0457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Around 5 percent of all patients with metastatic breast cancer go on to develop distant metastases in the meninges, also known as meningeal carcinomatosis. The median survival of these patients is between 3.5 and 4.5 months. Current treatment approaches are based on radiotherapy, systemic and intrathecal therapy. Methotrexate, liposomal cytarabine and trastuzumab are the most common substances used for intrathecal therapy. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of these intrathecal therapy options for meningeal carcinomatosis. A systematic search of the literature was carried out in PubMed using the following search terms: "meningeal metastases", "meningeal carcinomatosis", "leptomeningeal metastasis", "leptomeningeal carcinomatosis", "leptomeningeal disease", "breast cancer", "MTX", "methotrexate", "DepoCyte", "liposomal cytarabine", "trastuzumab" and "anti-HER2". This search resulted in 75 potentially relevant studies, 11 of which were included in this review after meeting the previously determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies differ considerably with regards to study design, cohort size, and dosages of administered drugs. In principle, intrathecal therapy has a tolerable side-effects profile and offers promising results in terms of the median overall survival following treatment with trastuzumab for HER2-positive primary tumors. The focus when treating meningeal carcinomatosis must be on providing a multimodal individual therapeutic approach. However, comprehensive studies which compare the efficacy and side effects of individual pharmaceuticals are lacking. Because of the poor prognosis associated with meningeal carcinomatosis, an approach which treats only the symptoms (best supportive care) should always be considered and discussed with affected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Marowsky
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Schmalfeldt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Riecke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Elena Laakmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Primdahl D, Cohen-Nowak A, Kumthekar P. Novel approaches to treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. Curr Opin Neurol 2023; 36:592-602. [PMID: 37865856 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases is increasing in the setting of improved survival from systemic cancers. In more recent years, our understanding of leptomeningeal metastasis pathogenesis, how to diagnose and treat has been evolving. RECENT FINDINGS Diagnosing leptomeningeal metastasis has been challenging due to the limitations of cytology and neuroimaging; However, newer techniques detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have shown potential advantage with diagnosis, quantification and detection of oncogenic mutations. The use of small molecule inhibitors and immunotherapy has shown some promise in specific leptomeningeal metastasis subtypes. SUMMARY These new discoveries have improved clinical trials' ability to assess treatment response and thereby more optimally compare different treatments. Furthermore, they have helped the individual clinician better diagnose, monitor the disease and provide novel therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ditte Primdahl
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Adam Cohen-Nowak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Holdaway M, Ablyazova F, Huda S, D'Amico RS, Wong T, Shani D, Ben-Shalom N, Boockvar JA. First in-human intrathecal delivery of bevacizumab for leptomeningeal spread from recurrent glioblastoma: rationale for a dose escalation trial. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:231-237. [PMID: 37548850 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04412-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To outline the dose rationale for the first in-human intrathecal delivery of bevacizumab for LMS of GBM. METHODS A 19-year-old female patient presented to Lenox Hill Hospital following thalamic GBM recurrence. She subsequently underwent two infusions of intra-arterial BEV (NCT01269853) and experienced a period of relative disease stability until progression in 2022. One month later, MRI disclosed diffuse enhancement representative of LMS of GBM. The patient subsequently underwent five cycles of IT BEV in mid-2022 (IND 162119). Doses of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, 50 mg, 50 mg, and 37.8 mg were delivered at two-week intervals between doses 1-4. The final 37.8 mg dose was given one day following her fourth dose, given that the patient was to be discharged, traveled several hours to our center, and was tolerating therapy well. Dosage was decreased due to the short interval between the final two treatments. Shortly after IT BEV completion, she received a third dose of IA BEV. RESULTS Our patient did not show any signs of serious adverse effects or dose limiting toxicities following any of the treatments. It is difficult to determine PFS due to the rapid progression associated with LMS of GBM and rapid timeframe of treatment. CONCLUSION LMS continues to be a devastating progression in many types of cancer, including GBM, and novel ways to deliver therapeutics may offer patients symptomatic and therapeutic benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Holdaway
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
- Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
| | - Faina Ablyazova
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Shayan Huda
- CUNY School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Randy S D'Amico
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Tamika Wong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Dana Shani
- Department of Hematology, Medical Oncology, Internal Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY, USA
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, NY, USA
| | - Netanel Ben-Shalom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - John A Boockvar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baskaran AB, Bhatia A, Kumthekar P, Boire A, Lukas RV. Cerebrospinal fluid-administered therapies for leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors. Future Oncol 2023; 19:1801-1807. [PMID: 37737023 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims/purpose: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Several approaches are used to treat LM, including intrathecally administered therapies. We consolidated current studies exploring intrathecal therapies for LM treatment. Patients & methods: A review of clinical trials using intrathecal agents was conducted with outcomes tabulated and trends described. 48 trials met the inclusion criteria. Initial investigations began with cytotoxic agents; following this were formulations with longer cerebrospinal fluid half-lives, targeted antibodies and radionucleotides. Results & conclusion: Outcomes were not reported consistently. Survival, when reported, remained poor. Intrathecal therapies for LM remain a viable option. Their use can be informed by an understanding of efficacy, safety and toxicity. They may be an important component of future LM treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archit B Baskaran
- Resident, Department of Neurology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Ankush Bhatia
- Section Head of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Medicine, & Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Geoffrey Beene Junior Faculty Chair, Department of Neurology, Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- Neuro-Oncology Division, Associate Professor, Regional Ambulatory Medical Director, Neurology, Department of Neurology, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Evolving Landscape of Leptomeningeal Cancer from Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030685. [PMID: 36765643 PMCID: PMC9913452 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is a fatal but uncommon complication occurring in 5-15% of patients with stage IV cancer. Current treatment options are ineffective at managing leptomeningeal spread, with a median overall survival (mOS) of 2-6 months. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify past and future therapies for LMC from solid tumors. Forty-three clinical trials (CTs) published between 1982-2022 were identified. Of these, 35 (81.4%) were non-randomized CTs and 8 (18.6%) were randomized CTs. The majority consisted of phase I (16.3%) and phase II CTs (65.1%). Trials enrolled patients with LMC from various primary histology (n = 23, 57.5%), with one CT evaluating LCM from melanoma (2.4%). A total of 21 trials evaluated a single modality treatment. Among CTs, 23.7% closed due to low accrual. Intraventricular (ITV)/intrathecal (IT) drug delivery was the most common route of administration (n = 22, 51.2%) vs. systemic drug delivery (n = 13, 30.3%). Two clinical trials evaluated the use of craniospinal irradiation for LMC with favorable results. LMC continues to carry a dismal prognosis, and over the years, increments in survival have remained stagnant. A paradigm shift towards targeted systemic therapy with continued standardization of efficacy endpoints will help to shed light on promising treatments.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ozcan G, Singh M, Vredenburgh JJ. Leptomeningeal Metastasis from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Current Landscape of Treatments. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:11-29. [PMID: 35972437 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC), is a devastating complication of metastatic cancer that occurs when neoplastic cells invade the meningeal space. Diagnosis of LM remains challenging given the heterogeneous signs and symptoms at presentation and requires thorough neurological examination, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and MRI of the brain and spine with gadolinium. Detecting neoplastic cells in the CSF is the gold standard for diagnosing leptomeningeal metastases; however, it has low sensitivity and may require multiple CSF samples. New emerging technologies, such as liquid biopsy of CSF, have increased sensitivity and specificity for detecting circulating tumor cells in CSF. The management of LM in patients with NSCLC requires an individualized multidisciplinary approach. Treatment options include surgery for ventricular shunt placement, radiation therapy to bulky or symptomatic disease sites, systemic or intrathecal chemotherapy, molecularly targeted agents, and, more recently, immunotherapy. Targeting actionable mutations in LM from NSCLC, such as EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement inhibitors, has shown encouraging results in terms of disease control and survival. Although there are limited data regarding the use of immunotherapy in LM, immunotherapy has produced promising results in several case reports. In this review, we focused on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and current treatment strategies, with a special emphasis on novel agents, including targeted therapies and immunotherapy of LM in patients with NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonca Ozcan
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Meghana Singh
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - James J Vredenburgh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Saint Francis Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Intrathecal therapy for the management of leptomeningeal metastatic disease: a scoping review of the current literature and ongoing clinical trials. J Neurooncol 2022; 160:79-100. [PMID: 35999434 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04118-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Leptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD) from advanced malignancies has poor prognoses and limited treatments. Intrathecal therapy (ITT) protocols are available, showing variable outcomes. We reviewed the therapeutic and toxicity profiles of ITT in LMD. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, and Scopus were searched following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to include studies reporting ITT for LMD. CLINICALTRIAL gov and Cochrane were searched to identify ongoing clinical trials. RESULTS We included 27 published studies encompassing 2161 patients and 4 ongoing trials. LMD originated from brain metastases (85.5%), lymphomas (5.4%), high-grade gliomas (4.6%), medulloblastomas (2.3%), and leukemias (2.1%). LMD was mostly diagnosed with the co-presence of neurological-related symptoms and positive imaging and/or cerebrospinal fluid cytology (60.8%). The most common ITT agents were methotrexate (35.9%), cytarabine (21.9%), and thiotepa (8.2%), standalone or combined. Patients received a median of 6.5 ITT cycles (range, 1.0-71.0) via intraventricular (58.8%) or lumbar intrathecal (41.2%) routes. The Ommaya reservoir was implanted in 38.5% cases. Concurrent systemic chemotherapy (45.2%) and/or radiotherapy (30.6%) were used. After 1-3 cycles, 44.7% patients had improved clinical status and 29.9% converted into negative cerebrospinal fluid cytology. The most common ITT-related severe adverse events were neutropenia (6.5%), meningitis (5.2%) and encephalopathy (4.5%). Median freedom from progression was 2.4 months (range, 0.1-59.5) and median overall survival 5.5 months (range, 0.1-148.0). CONCLUSION Current ITT protocols are variable but effective and well-tolerated in LMD. Ongoing trials are investigating dose-limiting toxicity profiles and long-term overall survival. Future studies should analyze the therapeutic and safety profiles of ITT compared to newer systemic therapies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Oberkampf F, Gutierrez M, Trabelsi Grati O, Rhun ÉL, Trédan O, Turbiez I, Kadi A, Dubot C, Taillibert S, Vacher S, Bonneau C. Phase II study of intrathecal administration of trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis. Neuro Oncol 2022; 25:365-374. [PMID: 35868630 PMCID: PMC9925703 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC) develop central nervous system metastases twice as often as patients with luminal HER2-negative breast cancer. Leptomeningeal progression results in a drastically altered prognosis with limited therapeutic options. This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy of intrathecal (IT) trastuzumab in HER2 + BC patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), based on a phase I dose-escalation study that had determined the recommended weekly dose of 150 mg for phase II. METHODS Eligible patients received weekly administrations of 150 mg of IT trastuzumab. The primary endpoint was clinical neurologic progression-free survival (LM-related-PFS) after 8 weeks. Overall survival (OS), toxicities, and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS Among the 19 enrolled patients, 16 (84%) had concomitant brain metastases, 15 of them had received prior radiotherapy to the brain. All patients had received at least one line of systemic anti-HER2 therapy. After 8 weeks, 14 patients (74%) were free of neurological progression. The median LM-related-PFS was 5.9 months and the median OS was 7.9 months. According to the QLQ-C30 and BN20 scales, the global health-related QoL status seemed preserved and no toxicity above grade 3 was observed. CONCLUSIONS Conducting studies on patients with LM poses significant challenges and ethical dilemmas inherent to this population. Despite some limits, this phase II study's findings in terms of clinical neurologic response and QoL's control confirms weekly administration of 150 mg of IT trastuzumab as a valuable option for HER + BC patients with LM and support the interest for further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Oberkampf
- Department of Oncology, Institut Curie-St Cloud, 92210, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Maya Gutierrez
- Department of Oncology, Institut Curie-St Cloud, 92210, Saint Cloud, France
| | | | - Émilie Le Rhun
- Neuro-Oncology Neurosurgery Department, University of LilleFrance, CHU Lille, France,Neurology, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Olivier Trédan
- Department of Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Isabelle Turbiez
- Department of Clinical Research, Institut Curie-St Cloud, 92210, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Amir Kadi
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie-St Cloud, 92210, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Coraline Dubot
- Department of Oncology, Institut Curie-St Cloud, 92210, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Sophie Taillibert
- Department of Neurology Mazarin, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Vacher
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie-Paris, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Claire Bonneau
- Corresponding Author: Claire Bonneau, Department of surgery, Institut Curie-Saint-Cloud, 35 Rue Dailly, 92210 Saint Cloud, France ()
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Leptomeningeal Disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2022; 22:413-425. [PMID: 35588045 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-022-01198-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a rare, late complication of systemic cancer and is associated with significant neurological morbidity and high mortality. Here we provide an overview of this condition, summarizing key recent research findings and clinical practice trends in its diagnosis and treatment. We also review current clinical trials for LMD. RECENT FINDINGS Improved molecular diagnostic tools are in development to enable more sensitive detection of LMD, including circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. The use of targeted and CNS-penetrant therapeutics has shown survival improvements with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and select chemotherapy. However, these studies have primarily been phase I/II and retrospective analyses. There remains a dearth of clinical trials that include LMD patients. The combination of patient-specific molecular information and novel therapeutic approaches holds significant promise for improving outcomes in patients with LMD.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tesolin D, Vergidis D, Ramchandar K. Craniospinal irradiation in the treatment of chemotherapy refractory leptomeningeal metastasis from breast cancer: A case report. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 5:e1556. [PMID: 34761557 PMCID: PMC9327655 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is a relatively uncommon complication of solid tumors that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prognosis is typically weeks to months and the neurologic complications of this disease can significantly affect quality of life. The role of craniospinal irradiation is unclear as evidence exploring this treatment option is limited. Despite lack of evidence, its use has decreased due to its associated acute toxicities and newer intrathecal alternatives. Case Here we report the case of a 50‐year‐old patient who received craniospinal irradiation for chemotherapy‐refractory leptomeningeal disease, with survival well beyond the median and good quality of life for the majority of that time. Conclusion This patient's remarkable survival and performance after treatment suggests that craniospinal irradiation could be considered more frequently in the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. To our knowledge, this is the first case with significant survival following craniospinal irradiation for chemotherapy refractory disease presented. Further study on the use of craniospinal irradiation to treat leptomeningeal metastasis is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Tesolin
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dimitrios Vergidis
- Providence Health Hematology/Oncology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Ramchandar
- Regional Cancer Care Northwest, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Comlek S, Saglam S. A new approach for leptomeningeal metastases: chemotherapy administered through lumbar intrathecal port. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2021; 79:816-823. [PMID: 34669821 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrathecal chemotherapy is a local therapeutic modality used for treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. However, the techniques currently used, i.e. repeated lumbar puncture and Ommaya reservoir, have certain disadvantages. Lumbar intrathecal port (LIP) placement is a relatively novel technique, which has been used for pain management in cancer patients. OBJECTIVE To investigate the use of LIP for intrathecal administration of chemotherapeutic agents in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. METHODS Retrospective study of 13 patients treated with intrathecal chemotherapy for secondary leptomeningeal involvement of a primary solid tumor were included in this retrospective study. The patients received intrathecal chemotherapy through a LIP. RESULTS The patients received a total of 123 intrathecal chemotherapy doses. No grade 3-4 toxicity, technical problem or severe complication developed. During a median of 136 days of follow-up (range, 67-376 days), 12 patients died (92.3%). The treatment resulted in symptom improvement in all patients and self-rated overall health and quality of life improved, compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS The LIP system, which has been used for intrathecal pain management for decades, appears to offer a safe alternative for intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Further studies are warranted to clarify its potential use in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savas Comlek
- Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hastanesi, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sezer Saglam
- Demiroglu Bilim Üniversitesi, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
García Molina E, Penas-Prado M. Neoplastic meningitis in solid tumours: updated review of diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic management, and future directions. NEUROLOGÍA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2021; 37:794-805. [PMID: 34663545 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2019.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a relatively frequent metastatic complication of cancer associated with high levels of neurological morbidity and generally poor prognosis. It appears in 5%-15% of patients with solid tumours, the most frequent being breast and lung cancer and melanoma. Symptoms are caused by involvement of the cerebral hemispheres, cranial nerves, spinal cord, and nerve roots, and are often multifocal or present with signs and symptoms of intracranial hypertension. The main diagnostic tools are the neurological examination, brain and spinal cord contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis including cytology, although studies have recently been conducted into the detection of tumour cells and DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid, which increases diagnostic sensitivity. With the currently available therapies, treatment aims not to cure the disease, but to delay and ameliorate the symptoms and to preserve quality of life. Treatment of NM involves a multimodal approach that may include radiotherapy, intrathecal and/or systemic chemotherapy, and surgery. Treatment should be individualised, and is based mainly on clinical practice guidelines and expert opinion. Promising clinical trials are currently being conducted to evaluate drugs with molecular and immunotherapeutic targets. This article is an updated review of NM epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, management, and treatment; it is aimed at general neurologists and particularly at neurologists practicing in hospital settings with oncological patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E García Molina
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
| | - M Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kanekar S, Zacharia T, Agarwal A. Neoplastic Meningitis and Paraneoplastic Syndromes. Radiol Clin North Am 2021; 59:409-423. [PMID: 33926686 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Neoplastic meningitis (NM) and paraneoplastic syndromes (PNSs) are a rare group of disorders present in patients with cancer. Clinical diagnosis of these conditions is challenging, and imaging and laboratory analysis play a significant role in diagnosing. Diagnosis of NM largely depends on documenting circulating tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or leptomeningeal and nodular enhancement on contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the brain or axial spine. PNSs encompass a variety of symptoms or syndromes. Paraneoplastic neuronal disorder diagnosis requires a multidimensional approach, high clinical suspicion, CSF and serum examination, and imaging. Neuroimaging is an integral part in the evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangam Kanekar
- Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Mail Code H066, 500 University drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA; Department of Neurology, Penn State Health, Mail Code H066, 500 University drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
| | - Thomas Zacharia
- Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Mail Code H066, 500 University drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Amit Agarwal
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical School and Parkland Hospital, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rossi SM, Murray T, McDonough L, Kelly H. Loco-regional drug delivery in oncology: current clinical applications and future translational opportunities. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2020; 18:607-623. [PMID: 33253052 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2021.1856074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Drug-based treatment regimens for cancer are often associated with off-target toxic side effects and low penetration of the drug at the tumor site leading to patient morbidity and limited efficacy. Loco-regional drug delivery has the potential to increase efficacy while concomitantly reducing toxicity.Areas covered: Clinical applications using loco-regional delivery include intra-arterial drug delivery in retinoblastoma, direct intra-tumoral (IT) injection of ethanol for ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the use of HIPEC in peritoneal carcinomas. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in both approved products and clinical trials, with a particular emphasis on drug delivery platforms such as drug-eluting beads for HCC and hydrogel platforms for intravesical delivery in bladder cancer.Expert opinion: Development of loco-regional drug-delivery systems has been slow, limited by weak clinical data for early applications and challenges relating to dosing, delivery and retention of drugs at the site of action. However, there is increasing focus on the potential of loco-regional drug delivery when combined with bespoke drug-delivery platforms. With the growth in immunotherapies, the use of IT delivery to drive priming of the anti-tumor response has opened up a new field of opportunity for loco-regional drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seona M Rossi
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Timothy Murray
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Liam McDonough
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helena Kelly
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
García Molina E, Penas-Prado M. Neoplastic meningitis in solid tumours: Updated review of diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic management, and future directions. Neurologia 2020; 37:S0213-4853(19)30141-0. [PMID: 31964538 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2019.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a relatively frequent metastatic complication of cancer associated with high levels of neurological morbidity and generally poor prognosis. It appears in 5%-15% of patients with solid tumours, the most frequent being breast and lung cancer and melanoma. Symptoms are caused by involvement of the cerebral hemispheres, cranial nerves, spinal cord, and nerve roots, and are often multifocal or present with signs and symptoms of intracranial hypertension. The main diagnostic tools are the neurological examination, brain and spinal cord contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis including cytology, although studies have recently been conducted into the detection of tumour cells and DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid, which increases diagnostic sensitivity. With the currently available therapies, treatment aims not to cure the disease, but to delay and ameliorate the symptoms and to preserve quality of life. Treatment of NM involves a multimodal approach that may include radiotherapy, intrathecal and/or systemic chemotherapy, and surgery. Treatment should be individualised, and is based mainly on clinical practice guidelines and expert opinion. Promising clinical trials are currently being conducted to evaluate drugs with molecular and immunotherapeutic targets. This article is an updated review of NM epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, management, and treatment; it is aimed at general neurologists and particularly at neurologists practicing in hospital settings with oncological patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E García Molina
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, España.
| | - M Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, Estados Unidos
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
García FJV, Carrión NP, de la Cruz-Merino L. Long-term complete response to intrathecal trastuzumab in a patient with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis due to her2- overexpressing breast cancer: Case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e18298. [PMID: 31895768 PMCID: PMC6946348 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Leptomeningeal dissemination due to HER2-overexpressing breast cancer is a rare and hard to treat complication with short-term dismal prognosis. PATIENT CONCERNS A 34-year-old female previously treated because of HER2+ breast cancer is admitted to the Neurology Department in December 2016 due to sensory-motor neurological semiology. DIAGNOSIS A wide set of diagnostic tests is performed and finally cytologic findings after repeated CSF confirm leptomeningeal infiltration by breast carcinoma (panCK+, GATA3+). INTERVENTIONS Weekly intrathecal triple therapy with methotrexate, cytarabine and hydrocortisone plus trastuzumab is carried out during 4 months. OUTCOMES Clinical and pathological response that lasts more than 24 months. CONCLUSION Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is an oncological situation where conventional therapies have limited activity. In HER2+ advanced breast cancer patients, intrathecal therapy with anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab) is feasible and may reach long-term disease control, especially in cases of low-tumor burden.
Collapse
|
20
|
Wright CH, Wright J, Onyewadume L, Raghavan A, Lapite I, Casco-Zuleta A, Lagman C, Sajatovic M, Hodges TR. Diagnosis, treatment, and survival in spinal dissemination of primary intracranial glioblastoma: systematic literature review. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 31:723-732. [PMID: 31374545 DOI: 10.3171/2019.5.spine19164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Spinal metastases from primary intracranial glioblastoma (GBM) are infrequently reported, and the disease has yet to be well characterized. A more accurate description of its clinical presentation and patient survival may improve understanding of this pathology, guide patient care, and advocate for increased inclusion in GBM research. The authors sought to describe the clinical presentation, treatment patterns, and survival in patients with drop metastases secondary to primary intracranial GBM. METHODS A systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were queried for abstracts that included patients with primary intracranial GBM and metastases to the spinal axis. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate characteristics of the primary brain lesion, timing of spinal metastases, clinical symptoms, anatomical location of the metastases, and survival and treatment parameters. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank analysis of the survival curves were performed for selected subgroups. RESULTS Of 1225 abstracts that resulted from the search, 51 articles were selected, yielding 86 subjects. The patients' mean age was 46.78 years and 59.74% were male. The most common symptom was lumbago or cervicalgia (90.24%), and this was followed by paraparesis (86.00%). The actuarial median survival after the detection of spinal metastases was 2.8 months and the mean survival was 2.72 months (95% CI 2.59-4.85), with a 1-year cumulative survival probability of 2.7% (95% CI 0.51%-8.33%). A diagnosis of leptomeningeal disease, present in 53.54% of the patients, was correlated, and significantly worse survival was on log-rank analysis in patients with leptomeningeal disease (p = 0.0046; median survival 2.5 months [95% CI 2-3] vs 4.0 months [95% CI 2-6]). CONCLUSIONS This study established baseline characteristics of GBMs metastatic to the spinal axis. The prognosis is poor, though these results will provide patients and clinicians with more accurate survival estimates. The quality of studies reporting on this disease pathology is still limited. There is significant need for improved reporting methods for spinal metastases, either through enrollment of these patients in clinical trials or through increased granularity of coding for metastatic central nervous system diseases in cancer databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Huang Wright
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
- 2Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; and
| | - James Wright
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
- 2Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; and
| | | | | | - Isaac Lapite
- 2Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; and
| | | | - Carlito Lagman
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
- 2Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; and
| | - Martha Sajatovic
- 3Neurological and Behavioral Outcomes Research Center and
- 4Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tiffany R Hodges
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
- 2Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; and
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Figura NB, Rizk VT, Armaghani AJ, Arrington JA, Etame AB, Han HS, Czerniecki BJ, Forsyth PA, Ahmed KA. Breast leptomeningeal disease: a review of current practices and updates on management. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177:277-294. [PMID: 31209686 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is an advanced metastatic disease presentation portending a poor prognosis with minimal treatment options. The advent and widespread use of new systemic therapies for metastatic breast cancer has improved systemic disease control and extended survival; however, as patients live longer, the rates of breast cancer LMD are increasing. METHODS In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of breast cancer LMD. RESULTS We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, intrathecal, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation specific to breast cancer patients. Furthermore, we discuss the controversies within this unique clinical setting and identify potential clinical opportunities to improve upon the diagnosis, treatment, and treatment response evaluation in the management of breast LMD. CONCLUSIONS We recognize the shortcomings in our current understanding of the disease and explore the future role of genomic/molecular disease characterization, technological innovations, and ongoing clinical trials attempting to improve the prognosis for this advanced disease state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas B Figura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Victoria T Rizk
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Avan J Armaghani
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - John A Arrington
- Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Arnold B Etame
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hyo S Han
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Brian J Czerniecki
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Le Rhun E, Preusser M, van den Bent M, Andratschke N, Weller M. How we treat patients with leptomeningeal metastases. ESMO Open 2019; 4:e000507. [PMID: 31231573 PMCID: PMC6555600 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The goal of treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis is to improve survival and to maintain quality of life by delaying neurological deterioration. Tumour-specific therapeutic options include intrathecal pharmacotherapy, systemic pharmacotherapy and focal radiotherapy. Recently, improvement of leptomeningeal disease-related progression-free survival by adding intrathecal liposomal cytarabine to systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone has been observed in a randomised phase III trial for patients with breast cancer with newly diagnosed leptomeningeal metastasis. Safety and efficacy of intrathecal administration of new agents such as trastuzumab are under evaluation. Systemic therapy using targeted agents and immunotherapy has also improved outcome in patients with brain metastasis, and its emerging role in the management of leptomeningeal metastasis needs to better studied in prospective series. Focal radiotherapy is commonly indicated for the treatment of macroscopic disease such as meningeal nodules or clinically symptomatic central nervous system structures, for example, base of skull with cranial nerve involvement or cauda equine syndrome. The role of whole brain radiotherapy is decreasing. An individualised combination of different therapeutic options should be used considering the presentation of leptomeningeal metastasis, as well as the histological and molecular tumour characteristics, the presence of concomitant brain and systemic metastases, and prior cancer-directed treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Le Rhun
- CHU Lille, Neuro-Oncology, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service, and Neurology & Medical Oncology, Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, University of Lille, F-59000, Lille, France; Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin van den Bent
- BrainTumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology & BrainTumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ponce S, Bruna J, Juan O, López R, Navarro A, Ortega AL, Puente J, Verger E, Bartolomé A, Nadal E. Multidisciplinary expert opinion on the treatment consensus for patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 138:190-206. [PMID: 31092376 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is associated with higher incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, patients with synchronous brain metastases at diagnosis have generally been excluded from clinical trials. As there is limited clinical evidence for managing this patient population, a multidisciplinary group of Spanish medical and radiation oncologists, and neuro-oncologist with expertise treating brain metastases in lung cancer patients met with the aim of reaching and developing an expert opinion consensus on the management of patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases. This consensus contains 26 recommendations and 20 conclusion statements across 21 questions in 7 areas, as well as a first-line treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Ponce
- Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Av. Cordoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - Jordi Bruna
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital-ICO, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Clinical Research in Solid Tumors (CReST) and Neuro-Oncology Group. Oncobell, IDIBELL, Avda Gran Via 199-203, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Oscar Juan
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Avda. de Fernando Abril Martorell, nº 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Rafael López
- Medical Oncology Unit. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Av. Ramón y Cajal, 3, 47003, Valladolid, Spain.
| | - Alejandro Navarro
- Medical Oncology. Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Ana Laura Ortega
- Oncology Research Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Av. del Ejército Español, 10, 23007, Jaén, Spain.
| | - Javier Puente
- GU, Thoracic and Melanoma Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Complutense University. Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos, Calle del Prof Martín Lagos, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Eugènia Verger
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Adela Bartolomé
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Av. Cordoba, s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Ernest Nadal
- Clinical Research in Solid Tumors (CReST) and Neuro-Oncology Group. Oncobell, IDIBELL, Avda Gran Via 199-203, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Thoracic Oncology Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology. Avda Gran Via 199-203, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Montes de Oca Delgado M, Cacho Díaz B, Santos Zambrano J, Guerrero Juárez V, López Martínez MS, Castro Martínez E, Avendaño Méndez-Padilla J, Mejía Pérez S, Reyes Moreno I, Gutiérrez Aceves A, González Aguilar A. The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis. Front Oncol 2018; 8:509. [PMID: 30524956 PMCID: PMC6256195 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Object: Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis (LCM) represents a state of systemic malignant disease with poor prognosis. The purpose of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) between intraventricular chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoir (OR) and chemotherapy through lumbar puncture (LP) in LCM. Patients and Methods: Forty adult patients with LCM were included. All patients underwent lumbar puncture and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty patients received chemotherapy through LP and 10 undergone colocation of Ommaya reservoir for intraventricular chemotherapy. Results: The most common symptom was headache (Present in 50%). The cranial nerves most affected were VI and VII. Leptomeningeal enhancement was the most frequent finding in MRI. The OS in the LP group was 4 months and Ommaya group was 9.2 months (p = 0.0006; CI:1.8-3), with statistical differences in favor to Intraventricular treatment. Proportional hazard regression showed that receiving chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoir was a protective factor (Hazard ratio = 0.258, Standard Error = 0.112, p = 0.002 and 95% CI 0.110-0.606). Using KPS as a factor did not affect the hazard ratio of Ommaya reservoir itself. Conclusions: OS was significantly higher in patients with Ommaya reservoir in spite of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) previous to chemotherapy. Therefore, intraventricular chemotherapy should be preferred over lumbar puncture chemotherapy administration if there are resources available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano Montes de Oca Delgado
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - José Santos Zambrano
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Vicente Guerrero Juárez
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Manuel Salvador López Martínez
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Elvira Castro Martínez
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla
- Neurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurooncology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sonia Mejía Pérez
- Neurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurooncology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ignacio Reyes Moreno
- Neurological Service, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves
- Neurological Service, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico.,Radioneurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Alberto González Aguilar
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurooncology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurological Service, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Burger MC, Wagner M, Franz K, Harter PN, Bähr O, Steinbach JP, Senft C. Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts Equipped with On-Off Valves for Intraventricular Therapies in Patients with Communicating Hydrocephalus due to Leptomeningeal Metastases. J Clin Med 2018; 7:jcm7080216. [PMID: 30110924 PMCID: PMC6111529 DOI: 10.3390/jcm7080216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Revised: 07/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with a reservoir and a valve to manually switch off the shunt function can be used for intraventricular injections of therapeutics in patients suffering from a communicating hydrocephalus caused by leptomeningeal metastases. These shunt devices avoid the risk of injecting therapeutics through the distal leg of the shunt system into the intraperitoneal space, which may cause toxicity. Furthermore, regular intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics help to maintain sufficient concentrations in the ventricular space. Therefore, ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with an on-off valve are a useful tool to reliably inject chemotherapeutics into the ventricles. In order to systematically assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this procedure, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with leptomeningeal metastases who had received a shunt system at our institution. In total, six adult patients had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt equipped with an on-off valve implanted. Out of these six patients, two patients subsequently received intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics. The configuration of the valve setting and the intraventricular injections were easily feasible in the setting of a neuro-oncology department. The complication of a shunt leakage occurred in one patient following the first intraventricular injection. No extra-central nervous system (CNS) toxicities were observed. In summary, ventriculoperitoneal shunts with on-off valves are useful tools for reliable intraventricular administration of therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Burger
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Marlies Wagner
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Kea Franz
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Patrick N Harter
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Institute of Neurology (Edinger Institute), Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Oliver Bähr
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Joachim P Steinbach
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Christian Senft
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) results from dissemination of cancer cells to both the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are the most common solid tumors that cause LM. Recent approval of more active anticancer therapies has resulted in improvement in survival that is partly responsible for an increased incidence of LM. Neurologic deficits, once manifest, are mostly irreversible, and often have a significant impact on patient quality of life. LM-directed therapy is based on symptom palliation, circumscribed use of neurosurgery, limited field radiotherapy, intra-CSF and systemic therapies. Novel methods of detecting LM include detection of CSF circulating tumor cells and tumor cell-free DNA. A recent international guideline for a standardization of response assessment in LM may improve cross-trial comparisons as well as within-trial evaluation of treatment. An increasing number of retrospective studies suggest that molecular-targeted therapy, such as EGFR and ALK inhibitors in lung cancer, trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer, and BRAF inhibitors in melanoma, may be effective as part of the multidisciplinary management of LM. Prospective randomized trials with standardized response assessment are needed to further validate these preliminary findings.
Collapse
|
27
|
Giugliani R, Dalla Corte A, Poswar F, Vanzella C, Horovitz D, Riegel M, Baldo G, Vairo F. Intrathecal/Intracerebroventricular enzyme replacement therapy for the mucopolysaccharidoses: efficacy, safety, and prospects. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/21678707.2018.1487838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Giugliani
- Medical Genetics Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Department of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Postgraduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Post-Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Amauri Dalla Corte
- Post-Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Fabiano Poswar
- Medical Genetics Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Cláudia Vanzella
- Medical Genetics Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Dafne Horovitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Women, Children and Adolescent Health Fernandes Figueira/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Mariluce Riegel
- Medical Genetics Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Postgraduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Guilherme Baldo
- Postgraduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Postgraduate Program in Physiology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Filippo Vairo
- Center of Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Le Rhun E, Taillibert S, Chamberlain MC. Neoplastic Meningitis Due to Lung, Breast, and Melanoma Metastases. Cancer Control 2018; 24:22-32. [DOI: 10.1177/107327481702400104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Le Rhun
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology and
Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle,
Washington
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, the Breast
Unit, Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of
Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sophie Taillibert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille
Cedex, France, the Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology and Neurological
Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Marc C. Chamberlain
- Departments of Neurology, and Radiation Oncology,
Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et
Marie Curie, Paris, France, and the Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research
Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, and Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of
Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle,
Washington
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Efficacy of intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with central nervous system involvement of hematological malignancies: a retrospective analysis. J Neurooncol 2018; 139:117-123. [PMID: 29633110 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2849-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/25/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Central nervous system (CNS) involvement, especially involvement of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), is common in several haematological malignancies. Intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy can be used to manage CSF involvement. METHODS Here we evaluated the effectiveness of IT chemotherapy among 80 patients with haematological malignancies and CSF localization who were treated with IT chemotherapy from 2001 to 2012. RESULTS The majority of patients was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (26%) or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma (19%). After first-line IT chemotherapy, which mainly consisted of methotrexate (MTX) and corticosteroids, CSF complete response (CSF CR) was achieved in 76% of patients. 91% reached CSF CR when including second-line IT-chemotherapy. Clinical response was documented in 75%. Although most patients were additionally treated with systemic chemotherapy, response rate did not differ between patients treated with CNS-penetrating and CNS-non-penetrating drugs. CNS progression/relapse occurred in 40% of patients with median progression-free survival of 12.2 months. The median overall survival was 18.3 months; 55% of the patients died during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis shows a high response rate after first-line IT chemotherapy, but also a relatively high progression/relapse percentage.
Collapse
|
30
|
Durand B, Zairi F, Boulanger T, Bonneterre J, Mortier L, Le Rhun E. Chemical meningitis related to intra-CSF liposomal cytarabine. CNS Oncol 2017; 6:261-267. [PMID: 29057672 PMCID: PMC6004879 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2016-0046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic options of leptomeningeal metastases include intra-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) chemotherapy. Among intra-CSF agents, liposomal cytarabine has advantages but can induce specific toxicities. A BRAF-V600E-mutated melanoma leptomeningeal metastases patient, treated by dabrafenib and liposomal cytarabine, presented after the first injection of liposomal cytarabine with hyperthermia and headaches. Despite sterile CSF/blood analyses, extended intravenous antibiotics were given and the second injection was delayed. The diagnosis of chemical meningitis was finally made. Dose reduction and appropriate symptomatic treatment permitted the administration of 15 injections of liposomal cytarabine combined with dabrafenib. A confirmation of the diagnosis of chemical meningitis is essential in order (1) not to delay intra-CSF or systemic chemotherapy or (2) to limit the administration of unnecessary but potentially toxic antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bénédicte Durand
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Fahed Zairi
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- Inserm, U-1192, F-59000 Lille, France
- CHU Lille, Neurosurgery Department, F-59000Lille, France
| | - Thomas Boulanger
- Oscar Lambret Center, Department of Radiology, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Jacques Bonneterre
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Laurent Mortier
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- CHU Lille, Dermatology Department, F-59000Lille, France
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France
- Inserm, U-1192, F-59000 Lille, France
- CHU Lille, Neurosurgery Department, F-59000Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Le Rhun E, Weller M, Brandsma D, Van den Bent M, de Azambuja E, Henriksson R, Boulanger T, Peters S, Watts C, Wick W, Wesseling P, Rudà R, Preusser M. EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:iv84-iv99. [PMID: 28881917 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 236] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Le Rhun
- Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, Lille University Hospital, Lille
- Neurology, Medical Oncology Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille
- Lille University, Inserm U-1192, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumour Center, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - M Van den Bent
- The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E de Azambuja
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet and L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Henriksson
- Regional Cancer Center, Stockholm
- Department of Radiation Sciences and Oncology, University, Umea, Sweden
| | - T Boulanger
- Neuroradiology, Imaging Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - C Watts
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - W Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre and Brain Tumour Center, Amsterdam
- Department of Pathology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, City of Health and Science Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - M Preusser
- Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, CNS Unit Comprehensive Cancer Centre (CCC-CNS), Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Remon J, Le Rhun E, Besse B. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A continuing challenge in the personalized treatment era. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 53:128-137. [PMID: 28110254 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2016] [Revised: 12/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis is a fatal manifestation seen in advanced cancer patients. Its incidence is increasing, reaching 3.8% in molecularly unselected non-small cell lung cancer patients and up to 5% and 9% in ALK-rearranged and EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients, respectively. The prognosis remains poor despite systemic treatment, intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy and personalized treatments in molecularly selected patients. However, new therapies with improved cerebral-spinal fluid penetration have been developed for subgroups of molecular selected patients indicating they could be promising therapeutic options for managing leptomeningeal disease. Systemic chemotherapy, which may be combined with intrathecal chemotherapy, remains standard treatment for lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal disease and a good-risk profile. We summarize evidence reported in the literature for managing this complication in lung cancer patients. Based on this, we have selected potential therapeutic strategies that could be used in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Remon
- Gustave Roussy, Medical Oncology Department, Villejuif, France.
| | - E Le Rhun
- Neurology, Oscar Lambert Center Lille, Neuro-Oncology Department, Lille University Hospital and Lille University, INSERM U-1192, France.
| | - B Besse
- Gustave Roussy, Medical Oncology Department, Villejuif, France; Paris Sud University, France.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Scott BJ, Oberheim-Bush NA, Kesari S. Leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer - a systematic review. Oncotarget 2016; 7:3740-7. [PMID: 26543235 PMCID: PMC4826166 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2015] [Accepted: 09/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is limited data on the impact of specific patient characteristics, tumor subtypes or treatment interventions on survival in breast cancer LM. Methods A systematic review was conducted to assess the impact of hormone receptor and HER-2 status on survival in breast cancer LM. A search for clinical studies published between 1/1/2007 and 7/1/2012 and all randomized-controlled trials was performed. Survival data from all studies are reported by study design (prospective trials, retrospective cohort studies, case studies). Results A total of 36 studies with 851 LM breast cancer subjects were identified. The majority (87%) were treated with intrathecal chemotherapy. Pooled median overall survival ranged from 14.9-18.1 weeks depending on study type. Breast cancer LM survival (15 weeks) was longer than other solid tumor LM 8.3 weeks and lung cancer LM 8.7 weeks, but shorter than LM lymphoma (15.4 versus 24.2 weeks). The impact of hormone receptor and HER-2 status on survival could not be determined. Conclusions A median overall survival of 15 weeks in prospective studies of breast cancer LM provides a historical comparison for future LM breast cancer trials. Other outcomes including the impact of molecular status on survival could not be determined based on available studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Scott
- Department of Neurology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Santosh Kesari
- Translational Neuro-Oncology Laboratories and Department of Neurosciences, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee DW, Lee KH, Kim JW, Keam B. Molecular Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:ijms17071074. [PMID: 27399673 PMCID: PMC4964450 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Revised: 06/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is the multifocal seeding of cerebrospinal fluid and leptomeninges by malignant cells. The incidence of LMC is approximately 5% in patients with malignant tumors overall and the rate is increasing due to increasing survival time of cancer patients. Eradication of the disease is not yet possible, so the treatment goals of LMC are to improve neurologic symptoms and to prolong survival. A standard treatment for LMC has not been established due to low incidences of LMC, the rapidly progressing nature of the disease, heterogeneous populations with LMC, and a lack of randomized clinical trial results. Treatment options for LMC include intrathecal chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, but the prognoses remain poor with a median survival of <3 months. Recently, molecular targeted agents have been applied in the clinic and have shown groundbreaking results in specific patient groups epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy or an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor in lung cancer, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy in breast cancer, and CD20-targeted therapy in B cell lymphoma). Moreover, there are results indicating that the use of these agents under proper dose and administration routes can be effective for managing LMC. In this article, we review molecular targeted agents for managing LMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae-Won Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
| | - Kyung-Hun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
| | - Jin Wook Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
| | - Bhumsuk Keam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sacco K, Muhammad A, Saleem W, Alshaker H, Monzon L, Islam MR, Pchejetski D. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis as the primary presentation of relapse in breast cancer. Oncol Lett 2016; 12:779-782. [PMID: 27446350 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an uncommon presentation of relapse in breast cancer, which is associated with poor clinical outcomes and poor prognosis. Notably, LM most commonly occurs in breast cancer. The aim of the present review was to investigate the occurrence of LM as the primary presentation of relapse following remission in breast cancer patients and to determine whether specific histological subtypes are predisposed to meningeal metastases. In addition, the present review evaluated whether patients presenting with LM as the primary site of relapse exhibit differences in survival when compared with patients exhibiting metastasis to other sites. Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that LM is commonly associated with other sites of distant metastasis including lung, liver and bone metastases. The histological breast cancer subtype most commonly associated with LM was invasive lobular carcinoma, while triple-negative breast cancer patients appear to be predisposed to the development of LM when considering the overall prevalence of histological breast cancer subtypes. At present, data regarding LM as the primary site of relapse are limited due to its rarity as the first site of metastasis in breast cancer. Case-controlled studies are required to investigate the incidence of LM as the primary site of recurrence in breast cancer patients as this would enable treatment standardization and identification of prognostic factors for improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Sacco
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Aun Muhammad
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
| | | | - Heba Alshaker
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Petra University, Amman 00962, Jordan
| | - Leonardo Monzon
- Department of Imaging, St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Cochereau D, Da Costa S, Le Maignan C, Gauthier H, Cochereau J, Espié M, Giacchetti S, Teixeira L. [Intrathecal methotrexate in breast cancer meningeal carcinomatosis - Experience with a new administration schedule]. Bull Cancer 2016; 103:444-54. [PMID: 26987841 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Revised: 02/06/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Methotrexate represents the standard intrathecal treatment of breast cancer meningeal carcinomatosis. However, its optimal schedule remains undefined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate results obtained with the methotrexate schedule used in Saint-Louis hospital (Paris). Patients followed in Saint-Louis hospital for breast cancer and who received intrathecal methotrexate were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Intrathecal treatment received contained methotrexate 12 mg/day (days: 1-5) and then 15 mg/week until progression or toxicity. Between 2003 and 2015, 41 patients were included. Primitive tumours were RH+/HER2-, HER2+ and triple-negative in respectively 66%, 14%, 5% and 15% of patients, 22% of them had meningeal carcinomatosis as metastatic disease initial manifestation. Objective response rate was 54%, median overall survival was 4.0 mois [CI 95%: 3-7.3] and 1-year survival rate was 15.2% (11.4%, 50% et 0% in RH+/HER2-, HER2+ and triple-negative subgroups; HR=0.45 [0.21-0.97] between HER2+ and RH+/HER2-). In univariate analysis, prognostic factors were brain involvement (p=0.049), initial cerebrospinal fluid protein level (p=0.0002) and concomitant systemic treatment received (p=0.049). This intrathecal methotrexate schedule demonstrates a similar median overall survival as the one obtained with a dose-dense schedule and an improved quality of life. Nevertheless, as the objective response and 1-year survival rates are slightly inferior, a dose-dense schedule remains still preferred in HER2+ patients or in those harboring a mainly meningeal progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Cochereau
- AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Louis, centre des maladies du sein, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.
| | - Sabrina Da Costa
- AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Louis, centre des maladies du sein, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Christine Le Maignan
- AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Louis, service d'oncologie médicale, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Hélène Gauthier
- AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Louis, service d'oncologie médicale, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Cochereau
- CHRU, hôpital Gui-de-Chauliac, service de neurochirurgie, 80, avenue Augustin-Fliche, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France
| | - Marc Espié
- AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Louis, centre des maladies du sein, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France; Université Paris-Diderot, UFR de médecine, 75890 Paris cedex 18, France
| | - Sylvie Giacchetti
- AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Louis, centre des maladies du sein, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Luis Teixeira
- AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Louis, centre des maladies du sein, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France; AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Louis, service d'oncologie médicale, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France; Université Paris-Diderot, UFR de médecine, 75890 Paris cedex 18, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mack F, Baumert B, Schäfer N, Hattingen E, Scheffler B, Herrlinger U, Glas M. Therapy of leptomeningeal metastasis in solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 43:83-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Revised: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
40
|
Complications related to the use of an intraventricular access device for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumor: a single centre experience in 112 patients. J Neurooncol 2015; 124:317-23. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1842-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
41
|
Jurczak W, Kroll-Balcerzak R, Giebel S, Machaczka M, Giza A, Ogórka T, Fornagiel S, Rybka J, Wróbel T, Kumiega B, Skotnicki AB, Komarnicki M. Liposomal cytarabine in the prophylaxis and treatment of CNS lymphoma: toxicity analysis in a retrospective case series study conducted at Polish Lymphoma Research Group Centers. Med Oncol 2015; 32:90. [PMID: 25716885 PMCID: PMC4341025 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-015-0520-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Accepted: 02/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Lymphomas with primary or secondary involvement of central nervous system (CNS) have poor prognosis despite specific treatment protocols which include whole brain radiotherapy and high-dose systemic and/or intrathecal chemotherapy. Toxicity of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine-based regimens collected between November 2006 and January 2012 was assessed retrospectively. Data from 120 adult lymphoma patients with, or at high risk of CNS involvement who received intrathecal liposomal cytarabine-based regimens at six Polish Lymphoma Research Group centres between November 2006 and January 2012 were assessed retrospectively. Patients were divided into three cohorts: A (high risk of CNS disease, n = 88), B (cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis without neurological symptoms or pathological imaging findings, n = 7), and C (CNS disease/neurological involvement; n = 25). In all examined groups, toxicity of treatment was found to be acceptable (including the prophylactic setting). None of the patients in cohorts A or B who took intrathecal liposomal cytarabine 50 mg, repeated every 2–4 weeks (mean 3.8 doses) had experienced a CNS relapse at a median follow-up time of 3 years. Patients in cohort C had a 76 % overall neurological response rate (including a 40 % complete response rate) and median overall survival of 4.8 years. Regimens incorporating liposomal cytarabine seem to be safe and effective treatments for lymphomas with CNS involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech Jurczak
- Department of Haematology, Jagiellonian University, 36 Kopernika str., 30-501, Kraków, Poland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kak M, Nanda R, Ramsdale EE, Lukas RV. Treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: current challenges and future opportunities. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22:632-7. [PMID: 25677875 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2014] [Accepted: 10/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) in breast cancer patients confers a uniformly poor prognosis and decreased quality of life. Treatment options are limited and often ineffective, due in large part to limitations imposed by the blood-brain barrier and the very aggressive nature of this disease. The majority of studies investigating the treatment of LM are not specific to site of origin. Conducting randomized, disease-specific clinical trials in LM is challenging, and much clinical outcomes data are based on case reports or retrospective case series. Multiple studies have suggested that chemo-radiotherapy is superior to either chemotherapy or radiation therapy alone. Attempts to overcome current obstacles in the treatment of breast cancer LM hold promise for the future. We review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and prognosis of LM in breast cancer, and discuss the treatment options currently available as well as those under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Kak
- University of Chicago, Department of Neurology, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2030, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Rita Nanda
- University of Chicago, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Erika E Ramsdale
- University of Virginia, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- University of Chicago, Department of Neurology, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2030, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chamberlain M, Soffietti R, Raizer J, Rudà R, Brandsma D, Boogerd W, Taillibert S, Groves MD, Le Rhun E, Junck L, van den Bent M, Wen PY, Jaeckle KA. Leptomeningeal metastasis: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology critical review of endpoints and response criteria of published randomized clinical trials. Neuro Oncol 2014; 16:1176-85. [PMID: 24867803 PMCID: PMC4136900 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2013] [Accepted: 04/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To date, response criteria and optimal methods for assessment of outcome have not been standardized in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). METHODS A Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group of experts in LM critically reviewed published literature regarding randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and trial design in patients with LM. RESULTS A literature review determined that 6 RCTs regarding the treatment of LM have been published, all of which assessed the response to intra-CSF based chemotherapy. Amongst these RCTs, only a single trial attempted to determine whether intra-CSF chemotherapy was of benefit compared with systemic therapy. Otherwise, this pragmatic question has not been formally addressed in patients with solid cancers and LM. The methodology of the 6 RCTs varied widely with respect to pretreatment evaluation, type of treatment, and response to treatment. Additionally there was little uniformity in reporting of treatment-related toxicity. One RCT suggests no advantage of combined versus single-agent intra-CSF chemotherapy in patients with LM. No specific intra-CSF regimen has shown superior efficacy in the treatment of LM, with the exception of liposomal cytarabine in patients with lymphomatous meningitis. Problematic with all RCTs is the lack of standardization with respect to response criteria. There was considerable variation in definitions of response by clinical examination, neuroimaging, and CSF analysis. CONCLUSION Based upon a review of published RCTs in LM, there exists a significant unmet need for guidelines for evaluating patients with LM in clinical practice as well as for response assessment in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Chamberlain
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Jeffrey Raizer
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Dieta Brandsma
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Willem Boogerd
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Sophie Taillibert
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Morris D Groves
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Larry Junck
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| | - Kurt A Jaeckle
- Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Torino, Italy (R.S., R.R.); Department of Neurology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (J.R.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands (D.B., W.B.); Departments of Neuro-Oncology Mazarin and Radiation Oncology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, Paris, France (S.T.); Austin Brain Tumor Center, Texas Oncology/US Oncology Research, Austin, Texas (M.D.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France (E.L.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.J.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida (K.A.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Asynchronous leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from pancreatic cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Clin J Gastroenterol 2014; 7:434-40. [DOI: 10.1007/s12328-014-0518-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/27/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
45
|
Safety of Ommaya reservoirs in children with brain tumors: a 20-year experience with 5472 intraventricular drug administrations in 98 patients. J Neurooncol 2014; 120:139-45. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1531-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2014] [Accepted: 06/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
46
|
Allen JE, Patel AS, Prabhu VV, Dicker DT, Sheehan JM, Glantz MJ, El-Deiry WS. COX-2 Drives Metastatic Breast Cells from Brain Lesions into the Cerebrospinal Fluid and Systemic Circulation. Cancer Res 2014; 74:2385-90. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-2660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
47
|
Abstract
Neurologic complications of lung cancer are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. Tumor metastasis to the brain parenchyma is the single most common neurologic complication of lung cancer, of any histologic subtype. The goal of radiation therapy and in some cases surgical resection for patients with brain metastases is to improve or maintain neurologic function, and to achieve local control of the brain lesion(s). Metastasis of lung cancer to the spinal epidural space requires urgent evaluation and treatment. Early diagnosis and modern surgical and radiotherapy techniques improve neurologic outcome for most patients. Leptomeningeal metastasis is a less common but ominous occurrence in patients with lung cancer. Lung carcinomas can also occasionally metastasize to the brachial plexus, skull base, dura, or pituitary. Paraneoplastic neurologic disorders are uncommon but important complications of lung carcinoma, and are generally the presenting feature of the tumor. Paraneoplastic disorders are believed to be caused by an autoimmune humoral or cellular attack against shared "onconeural" antigens. The most frequent paraneoplastic disorders in patients with lung cancer are Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, and multifocal paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis, both mainly occurring in association with small-cell lung carcinoma. There is a variety of other paraneoplastic disorders affecting the central and peripheral nervous systems. Some affected patients have a good neurologic outcome, while others are left with severe permanent neurologic disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Dropcho
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lueshen E, Venugopal I, Kanikunnel J, Soni T, Alaraj A, Linninger A. Intrathecal magnetic drug targeting using gold-coated magnetite nanoparticles in a human spine model. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2013; 9:1155-69. [PMID: 23862614 DOI: 10.2217/nnm.13.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM We aimed to magnetically guide and locally confine nanoparticles in desired locations within the spinal canal to achieve effective drug administration for improved treatment of chronic pain, cancers, anesthesia and spasticity. MATERIALS & METHODS We developed a physiologically and anatomically consistent in vitro human spine model to test the feasibility of intrathecal magnetic drug targeting. Gold-coated magnetite nanoparticles were infused into the model and targeted to specific regions using external magnetic fields. Experiments and simulations aiming to determine the effect of key parameters, such as magnet strength, duration of magnetic field exposure, magnet location and ferrous implants, on the collection efficiency of superparamagnetic nanoparticles in targeted regions were performed. RESULTS An 891% increase in nanoparticle collection efficiency within the target region was achieved using intrathecal magnetic drug targeting when compared with the control. Nanoparticle collection efficiency at the target region increased with time and reached a steady value within 15 min. Ferrous epidural implants generated sufficiently high-gradient magnetic fields, even when magnets were placed at a distance equal to the space between a patient's epidermis and spinal canal. CONCLUSION Our experiments indicate that intrathecal magnetic drug targeting is a promising technique for concentrating and localizing drugs at targeted sites within the spinal canal for treating diseases affecting the CNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Lueshen
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Bioengineering, Laboratory for Product & Process Design, 851 South Morgan Street - 218 SEO, Chicago, IL 60607-7000, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
The incidence of metastases of the central nervous system (CNS) is increasing, due to the improvement of the overall survival of cancer patients. Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are now more often identified, although the criteria used for the diagnosis and monitoring remains inadequate. LM should be diagnosed at an early stage of the disease before the setting of neurological deficits, in order to improve the quality of life of patients. Therapeutic indications remain difficult, though some criteria have been proposed. Prolonged survivals have been reported even in the presence of identified poor prognostic factors at the time of the diagnosis of LM. The median survival of untreated patients is 4 to 6 weeks. Specific treatment may prolong survival by several months. Only six randomized studies are available. All theses studies have limitations due to the difficulty of including these patients in homogeneous trials, with a good methodology and for a time acceptable to the patient enrolment. The treatment requires a combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapies administrated systemically or via intra-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) route, surgery and radiotherapy. Patient management is specific but requires a multidisciplinary approach, which may vary according to the characteristics of meningeal disease, the characteristics of primary tumors, the general condition of patients and previous lines of treatments. Our objective was to describe the current management of LM of solid tumors.
Collapse
|
50
|
Nagpal S, Riess J, Wakelee H. Treatment of leptomeningeal spread of NSCLC: a continuing challenge. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2013; 13:491-504. [PMID: 22836285 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-012-0206-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Leptomeningeal metastasis is a serious and frequently fatal complication of non-small cell lung cancer. Curative treatment remains elusive, but careful use of radiation, systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, and symptoms management can greatly improve quality of life and survival. For most patients, we recommend a combination of skull-based radiation with focal radiation to any symptomatic spinal segments followed by systemic chemotherapy. For patients with EGFR mutations, erlotinib may be used as first-line therapy in a daily or high-dose regimen. Pemetrexed has promise for use in patients with brain and leptomeningeal metastases. Patients with multiple comorbidities or low performance status may tolerate intrathecal therapy better than systemic chemotherapy. The most commonly used intrathecal chemotherapies are methotrexate and liposomal cytarabine, although newer agents, such as topotecan and mafosfamide, may be more effective. Elevated intracranial pressure, which causes headaches, vertigo, nausea, and vomiting, should be treated with dexamethasone and acetazolamide. In select patients, cerebrospinal fluid shunting may be considered. The use of antidepressants, central nervous system stimulants, benzodiazepines, antiemetics, and pain medications can increase quality of life in patients with leptomeningeal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema Nagpal
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-oncology, Stanford Cancer Center, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive CC2221, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|