Postoperative radiation therapy for low-grade glioma

The effects of tumor size and postoperative radiotherapy for patients with adult low-grade (WHO grade II) infiltrative supratentorial astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma: A population-based and propensity score matched study

Background

The update of 2018 NCCN guidelines (central nervous system cancers) recommended the risk classification of postoperative patients diagnosed as adult low‐grade (WHO grade II) infiltrative supratentorial astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma (ALISA/O) should take tumor size into consideration. Moreover, the guidelines removed postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for low risk patients. Our study aimed to explore the specific tumor size to divide postoperative patients into relatively low‐ or high risk subgroups and the effect of PORT for ALISA/O patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study choosing 1277 postoperative ALISA/O patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The X‐tile analysis provided the optimal cutoff point based on tumor size. The differences between surgery alone and surgery +RT groups were balanced by propensity score‐matched analysis. The multivariable analysis and the nomogram evaluated multiple prognostic factors based on cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

X‐tile plots defined 59 mm (P < 0.001) as the optimal cutoff tumor size value in terms of CSS, which was verified in multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). The Kaplan‐Meier analysis showed that the surgery alone had higher CSS and OS than surgery +RT, while the low risk group had no statistical significance after propensity score match. Multivariable analysis showed that surgery +RT was independently associated with diminished OS and CSS for high risk group, which had no statistical significance for low‐risk group.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that tumor size of 59 mm was an optimal cutoff point to divide postoperative patients into relatively low‐ or high risk subgroups. PORT may not benefit patients, while the effects of PORT for low risk patients need further research.

Impact of adjuvant treatments on survival in Korean patients with WHO grade II gliomas: KNOG 15-02 and KROG 16-04 intergroup study

INTRODUCTION

Optimal treatment strategies for low-grade glioma (LGG) remain controversial. We analyzed treatment outcomes and evaluated prognostic factors of adult LGG patients in Korea.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 555 patients diagnosed with WHO grade II LGG (astrocytoma 37.8%, oligoastrocytoma 15.3%, and oligodendroglioma 46.8%) at 14 institutions between 2000 and 2010. Primary and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity-score matching (PSM) analyses were performed to correct imbalances in patient/tumor characteristics among adjuvant treatment groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 83.4 months, and the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 52.2% and 83.0%, respectively. Male, older age, poorer performance status, multiple lobe involvement, and astrocytoma histology were associated with poorer survival. Among the treatment factors, gross total resection (GTR) was associated with better PFS and OS, and adjuvant chemotherapy with improved PFS. Interestingly, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) did not improve PFS; rather, it was related with poorer OS. Regarding patient/tumor characteristics, the RT group had poorer characteristics than the non-RT group. After PSM, we detected a tendency for improved PFS in the matched RT group, and no significant difference in OS compared with the matched non-RT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The achievement of GTR is important to improve survival in LGG patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy may enhance PFS, but adjuvant RT did not improve survival outcomes. After PSM, we observed potential impacts of adjuvant RT on PFS. Our results may reflect real-world practice and consequently may help to optimize treatment strategies for LGG.

Oligodendroglioma resection: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis

OBJECTIVE

The available evidence suggests that the clinical benefits of extended resection are limited for chemosensitive tumors, such as primary CNS lymphoma. Oligodendroglioma is generally believed to be more sensitive to chemotherapy than astrocytoma of comparable grades. In this study the authors compare the survival benefit of gross-total resection (GTR) in patients with oligodendroglioma relative to patients with astrocytoma.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (1999–2010) database, the authors identified 2378 patients with WHO Grade II oligodendroglioma (O2 group) and 1028 patients with WHO Grade III oligodendroglioma (O3 group). Resection was defined as GTR, subtotal resection, biopsy only, or no resection. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses were used to assess survival with respect to extent of resection.

RESULTS

Cox multivariate analysis revealed that the hazard of dying from O2 and O3 was comparable between patients who underwent biopsy only and GTR (O2: hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–1.53; O3: HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.80–1.72). A comprehensive search of the published literature identified 8 articles without compelling evidence that GTR is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oligodendroglioma.

CONCLUSIONS

This SEER-based analysis and review of the literature suggest that GTR is not associated with improved survival in patients with oligodendroglioma. This finding contrasts with the documented association between GTR and overall survival in anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma. The authors suggest that this difference may reflect the sensitivity of oligodendroglioma to chemotherapy as compared with astrocytomas.

Multi-institutional study of treatment patterns in Korean patients with WHO grade II gliomas: KNOG 15-02 and KROG 16-04 intergroup study

INTRODUCTION

We performed this study to identify the treatment patterns of patients with low-grade gliomas (LGG) in Korea.

METHODS

A total of 555 patients diagnosed as WHO grade II gliomas between 2000 and 2010 at 14 Korean institutions were included. The patients were divided into four adjuvant treatment groups: adjuvant fractionated radiotherapy (RT, N = 204), adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 20), adjuvant fractionated RT and chemotherapy (N = 65), and non-adjuvant treatment (N = 266) groups. We examined differences among the groups and validated patient/tumor characteristics associated with the adjuvant treatments.

RESULTS

Astrocytoma was diagnosed in 210 patients (38%), oligoastrocytoma in 85 patients (15%), and oligodendroglioma in 260 patients (47%). Gross total resection was performed in 200 patients (36%), subtotal resection in 153 (28%), partial resection in 71 patients (13%), and biopsy in 131 patients (24%). RT was most commonly applied as an adjuvant treatment. The use of chemotherapy with or without RT decreased after 2008 (from 38 to 4%). The major chemotherapeutic regimen was procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV); however, the proportion of temozolomide increased since 2005 (up to 69%). Patient/tumor characteristics related with RT were male gender, non-seizure, multiple lobes involvement, and non-gross total resection. Chemotherapy was associated with non-gross total resection and non-astrocytoma.

CONCLUSIONS

A preference for RT and increased use of temozolomide was evident in the treatment pattern of LGG. The extent of resection was associated with a decision to perform RT and chemotherapy. To establish a robust guideline for LGG, further studies including molecular information are needed.

Management of supratentorial recurrent low-grade glioma: A multidisciplinary experience in 35 adult patients

The management of recurrent diffuse low-grade gliomas (LGGs) is controversial. In the present study, the multidisciplinary management of 35 patients with recurrent LGGs was retrospectively analyzed. Tumor progression or recurrence was defined by clinical, radiological and/or metabolic pejorative evolution. All patients were regularly followed up by a multidisciplinary neuro-oncological group at Hôpital Erasme. Patients with histologically confirmed supratentorial LGGs (7 astrocytoma, 22 oligodendrogliomas and 6 oligoastrocytomas) who had undergone surgery between August 2004 and November 2010 were included. A total of 3 patients exhibited no tumor progression (median follow-up (FU), 81 months; range, 68-108 months). Tumor recurrence occurred in the 32 remaining patients [progression-free survival (PFS), 26 months; range, 2-104 months]. In addition, 25/29 (86%) patients who received surgery alone underwent reoperation at the time of tumor recurrence, and high-grade transformation occurred in 6 of these patients (24%). Furthermore, 4/29 (14%) patients were treated with adjuvant therapy alone (3 chemotherapy and 1 radiotherapy). In the 19 patients with no high-grade transformation at reintervention, 3 received adjuvant therapy and 16 were regularly followed up through multimodal imaging. The PFS time of the patients who underwent reoperation with close FU (n=16) and for the patients receiving adjuvant therapy with or without surgery (n=7) at first recurrence was 10 and 24 months (P=0.005), respectively. However, no significant difference was observed for overall survival (P=0.403). At the time of this study, 22 of the 35 patients included were alive following a median FU time of 109 months (range, 55-136). The results of the present study could change the multidisciplinary approach used into a more aggressive approach with adjuvant therapy, with or without surgery, for the treatment of a select subpopulation of patients with LGGs at the first instance of tumor recurrence.

Outcomes in Reoperated Low-Grade Gliomas

BACKGROUND:

Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) comprise a diverse set of intrinsic brain tumors that correlate strongly with survival. Data on the effect of reoperation are sparse.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effect of reoperation on patients with LGG.

METHODS:

Fifty-two consecutive patients with reoperated LGGs treated at the University of Washington between 1986 and 2004 were identified and evaluated in a retrospective analysis.

RESULTS:

The average overall survival (OS) for this cohort was 12.95 ± 0.96 years. The overall 10-year survival rate was 57%. The absence of any residual tumor at either the first or second operation was associated with significantly increased OS. Negative prognostic variables for OS included the use of upfront radiation and pathology at recurrence. The average overall progression-free survival to the first recurrence (PFS1) was 6.23 ± 0.51 years. Positive prognostic factors for improved PFS1 included the use of upfront radiation therapy. Variables not associated with differences in PFS1 included the use of upfront chemotherapy, enhancement, pathology, extent of resection, the presence of residual tumor, and Karnofsky Performance Scale score &lt;80. The average overall progression-free survival to the second recurrence was 2.73 ± 0.39 years. Pathology at recurrence was associated with significant differences in progression-free survival to the second recurrence, as was extent of resection at time of first recurrence, and Karnofsky Performance Scale score &lt;80.

CONCLUSION:

This is among the largest studies to assess variables associated with outcome in patients with reoperated LGG. Reresection appears to provide significant benefit, and extent of resection remains the strongest predictor of OS.