Hearing preservation in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma who undergo stereotactic radiosurgery: Reinterpretation of the auditory brainstem response

Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Primary Treatment of Sporadic Small to Medium (<3 cm) Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the literature regarding the use of stereotactic radiosurgery as the primary treatment of vestibular schwannoma to further evaluate efficacy and treatment-related neurologic deficits.

METHODS

Online databases were queried to identify relevant studies from January 2001 to December 2020. Full-text articles in English for sporadic vestibular schwannoma treated primarily with radiosurgery and documented hearing preservation data were reviewed. Studies that had a minimum follow-up period of less than 36 months, did not use radiosurgery for primary treatment, or included patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies involving 4286 patients with an average follow-up of 62.5 months were included in the final analysis. All 33 studies included eligible hearing data; overall preservation of serviceable hearing was found to be 58.27%. Twenty-seven studies with 3822 eligible patients were analyzed for tumor control rates; overall, tumor control was reported in 92.98% of cases. Twenty-seven studies were analyzed for posttreatment facial nerve dysfunction, which was reported in 1.53% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and effective primary treatment modality for sporadic vestibular schwannoma as shown by the present analysis. Radiosurgery is effective regarding tumor control and hearing preservation and offers a low rate of posttreatment facial nerve dysfunction.

Hearing preservation after stereotactic radiosurgery for sporadic intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas classified as Koos grade 1

INTRODUCTION

The mechanism of hearing loss following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannomas (VSs) remains unclear. There is conflicting evidence regarding cochlear nerve damage by transient volume expansion of VSs after radiosurgery and radiation-induced cochlear damage. This study aimed to investigate whether there is a specific patient population that can achieve definite hearing preservation after SRS for VSs.

METHODS

A total of 37 consecutive patients with sporadic unilateral intracanalicular VSs and serviceable hearing (Gardner-Roberson [G-R] class I or II) were treated with SRS from 2009 to 2023. This is a retrospective study. Survival analysis with Cox regression for hearing deterioration was performed.

RESULTS

The median age was 55 years old. The median tumor volume was 0.089 cm3 , and the median marginal dose was 12.0 Gy. Nonserviceable hearing deterioration occurred in 9 patients (24.3%), with a median onset of 11.9 months after SRS. The actuarial rates of serviceable hearing preservation were 86%, 82%, and 70% at 1, 2, and 3 years after SRS, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, only baseline pure tone average > 30 dB increased the risk of nonserviceable hearing deterioration with significant hazard ratio. There were 13 patients with petit VSs whose tumor volume was smaller than 0.05 cm3 , and 11 of them were treated by a 4-mm single shot with a marginal dose of 12 Gy. None of the 13 patients had nonserviceable hearing deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

Petit VSs that can be treated with 4-mm single or double shots with a marginal dose of 12 Gy may achieve hearing preservation after SRS.

Prediction of hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery based on SMOTE-XGBoost

Prior to the surgical removal of an acoustic neuroma, the majority of patients anticipate that their hearing will be preserved to the greatest possible extent following surgery. This paper proposes a postoperative hearing preservation prediction model for the characteristics of class-imbalanced hospital real data based on the extreme gradient boost tree (XGBoost). In order to eliminate sample imbalance, the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) is applied to increase the number of underclass samples in the data. Multiple machine learning models are also used for the accurate prediction of surgical hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma patients. In comparison to research results from existing literature, the experimental results found the model proposed in this paper to be superior. In summary, the method this paper proposes can make a significant contribution to the development of personalized preoperative diagnosis and treatment plans for patients, leading to effective judgment for the hearing retention of patients with acoustic neuroma following surgery, a simplified long medical treatment process and saved medical resources.

Primary treatment of small-to-medium (<3cm) sporadic vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis on hearing preservation and tumor control rates for microsurgery versus radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

A meta-analysis of sporadic VS patients primarily treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or microsurgery (MS) was performed, and hearing preservation outcome (HPO), tumor control (TC), and facial nerve dysfunction (FND) were analyzed.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted (Medline and Scopus database) for the period, January 2010 to June 2020 with appropriate MeSH. English language articles for small-to-medium sporadic VS (<3cm) utilizing SRS or MS as primary treatment modality, with minimum follow-up of 3 years, were included. Studies had to report an acceptable standardized hearing metric.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria: 10 (microsurgery); 23 (radiosurgery); (one comparative study included in both). HPO, at ∼65 months follow-up, were comparable between MS group (10 studies; 809 patients) and SRS group (23 studies; 1234 patients) (56% versus 59%, p=0.1527). TC, at ∼70 months follow-up, was significantly better in MS group (9 studies; 1635 patients) versus SRS group (19 studies; 2260 patients) (98% versus 92%, p < 0.0001). FND, at ∼ 12 months follow-up, was significantly higher in MS group (8 studies; 1101 patients) versus SRS group (17 studies; 2285 patients) (10% versus 2%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

MS and SRS are comparable primary treatments for small (<3cm) sporadic VS with respect to HPO at 5-year follow-up in patients with serviceable hearing at presentation; ∼50% patients for both modalities will likely lose serviceable hearing by that time-point. High TC rates (>90%) were seen with both modalities; MS (98%) versus SRS (92%). The post-treatment FND was significantly less with SRS group (2%) versus MS group (10%).

Fundal Fluid Cap Is Associated With Hearing Preservation in the Radiosurgical Treatment of Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between fundal fluid and hearing outcomes after treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary neurotology referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients treated with GKRS for vestibular schwannoma between March 2007 and March 2017 were considered for this study. Exclusion criteria included pretreatment pure-tone average (PTA) >90 dB, neurofibromatosis type II, history of previous surgical resection, and follow-up less than 1 year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Hearing function was assessed both by preservation of serviceable hearing and by preservation of baseline hearing (≤20 dB change in PTA) after GKRS. Hearing preservation comparisons were made between groups of patients with and without a fundal fluid cap.

RESULTS

Patients with a fundal cap had significantly higher rates of baseline hearing preservation (≤20 dB change in PTA) according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of all 106 patients (p = 0.006). By the 3rd year posttreatment, 70.9% of patients with a fundal cap had maintained a ≤20 dB change in PTA, while only 43.6% of patients without a fundal fluid cap achieved this outcome (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Fundal fluid present on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging is predictive of improved baseline hearing preservation rates in patients undergoing GKRS for vestibular schwannoma when considering all patients with PTA ≤90 dB. Fundal fluid cap presence may serve as a favorable prognostic indicator to help set hearing expectations and guide patient selection efforts.

Treatment Outcomes and Dose Rate Effects Following Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas

BACKGROUND

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS; Elekta AB) remains a well-established treatment modality for vestibular schwannomas. Despite highly effective tumor control, further research is needed toward optimizing long-term functional outcomes. Whereas dose-rate effects may impact post-treatment toxicities given tissue dose-response relationships, potential effects remain largely unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate treatment outcomes and potential dose-rate effects following definitive GKRS for vestibular schwannomas.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 419 patients treated at our institution between 1998 and 2015, characterizing baseline demographics, pretreatment symptoms, and GKRS parameters. The cohort was divided into 2 dose-rate groups based on the median value (2.675 Gy/min). Outcomes included clinical tumor control, radiographic progression-free survival, serviceable hearing preservation, hearing loss, and facial nerve dysfunction (FND). Prognostic factors were assessed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 227 patients with available follow-up. Following GKRS 2-yr and 4-yr clinical tumor control rates were 98% (95% CI: 95.6%-100%) and 96% (95% CI: 91.4%-99.6%), respectively. Among 177 patients with available radiographic follow-up, 2-yr and 4-yr radiographic progression-free survival rates were 97% (95% CI: 94.0%-100.0%) and 88% (95% CI: 81.2%-95.0%). The serviceable hearing preservation rate was 72.2% among patients with baseline Gardner-Robertson class I/II hearing and post-treatment audiological evaluations. Most patients experienced effective relief from prior headaches (94.7%), tinnitus (83.7%), balance issues (62.7%), FND (90.0%), and trigeminal nerve dysfunction (79.2%), but not hearing loss (1.0%). Whereas GKRS provided effective tumor control independently of dose rate, GKRS patients exposed to lower dose rates experienced significantly better freedom from post-treatment hearing loss and FND (P = .044).

CONCLUSION

Whereas GKRS provides excellent tumor control and effective symptomatic relief for vestibular schwannomas, dose-rate effects may impact post-treatment functional outcomes. Further research remains warranted.

Systematic Review of Hearing Preservation After Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term hearing preservation rate for spontaneous vestibular schwannoma treated by primary radiotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, and EMBASE databases were searched using a comprehensive Boolean keyword search developed in conjunction with a scientific librarian. English language papers published from 2000 to 2016 were evaluated.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria: full articles, pretreatment and posttreatment audiograms or audiogram based scoring system, vestibular schwannoma only tumor type, reported time to follow-up, published after 1999, use of either Gamma Knife or linear accelerator radiotherapy.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

case report or series with fewer than five cases, inadequate audiometric data, inadequate time to follow-up, neurofibromatosis type 2 exceeding 10% of study population, previous treatment exceeding 10% of study population, repeat datasets, use of proton beam therapy, and non-English language.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently analyzed papers for inclusion. Class A/B, 1/2 hearing was defined as either pure tone average less than or equal to 50 db with speech discrimination score more than or equal to 50%, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Hearing Class A or B, or Gardner-Robertson Grade I or II. Aggregate data were used when individual data were not specified.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Means were compared with student t test.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty seven articles containing a total of 2,195 patients with preserved Class A/B, 1/2 hearing were identified for analysis. The aggregate crude hearing preservation rate was 58% at an average reporting time of 46.6 months after radiotherapy treatment. Analysis of time-based reporting shows a clear trend of decreased hearing preservation extending to 10-year follow-up. This data encourages a future long-term controlled trial.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on Hearing Preservation Outcomes in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas

Question 1

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 2

Among patients with AAO-HNS (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery hearing classification) class A or GR (Gardner-Robertson hearing classification) grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery, utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 3

What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery using ≤13 Gy to the tumor margin?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size, marginal tumor dose ≤12 Gy, and cochlear dose ≤4 Gy. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome.

Question 4

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 5

Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 6

What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size commonly less than 1 cm, and presence of a distal internal auditory canal cerebrospinal fluid fundal cap. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome.

Question 7

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation of vestibular schwannomas at 2, 5, and 10 yr following diagnosis?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 8

Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation at 2 and 5 yr following diagnosis?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, and moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr. Insufficient data were available to determine the probability of hearing preservation at 10 yr for this population subset.

Question 9

What patient and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing during conservative observation?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled regarding probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, as well as nongrowth of the tumor. Tumor size at the time of diagnosis, age, and sex do not predict future development of nonserviceable hearing during observation.  The full guideline can be found at: https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-manage-ment-patients-vestibular-schwannoma/chapter_3.

Preserved Cochlear CISS Signal is a Predictor for Hearing Preservation in Patients Treated for Vestibular Schwannoma With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Hearing preservation is a goal for many patients with vestibular schwannoma. We examined pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and posttreatment hearing outcome after stereotactic radiosurgery.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2014, a cohort of 125 consecutive patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated via stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) were retrospectively reviewed. MRIs containing three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state or equivalent within 1 year before treatment were classified by two radiologists for pretreatment characteristics. "Good" hearing was defined as American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery class A. Poor hearing outcome was defined as loss of good pretreatment hearing after stereotactic radiosurgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients met criteria for inclusion. Most had tumors in the distal internal auditory canal (55%), separated from the brainstem (63%), oval shape (64%) without cysts (86%), and median volume of 0.85 ± 0.55 cm. Pretreatment audiograms were performed a median of 108 ± 173 days before stereotactic radiosurgery; 38% had good pretreatment hearing. Smaller tumor volume (p < 0.005) was the only variable associated with good pretreatment hearing. 49 (80%) patients had posttreatment audiometry, with median follow-up of 197 ± 247 days. Asymmetrically decreased pretreatment cochlear CISS signal on the side of the VS was the only variable associated with poor hearing outcome (p = 0.001). Inter-rater agreement on cochlear three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state preservation was 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased cochlear CISS signal may indicate a tumor's association with the cochlear neurovascular bundle, influencing endolymph protein concentration and creating an inability to preserve hearing. This important MRI characteristic can influence planning, counseling, and patient selection for vestibular schwannoma treatment.

Factors affecting hearing deterioration in vestibular schwannoma patients treated with gamma knife radiosurgery: the Asan Medical Center experience

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the changes in hearing and to determine factors predicting hearing deterioration in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) who undergo gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS).

DESIGN

A retrospective review of medical records in patients diagnosed with VS and initially treated with GKRS at a tertiary care medical center between 1995 and 2015 was performed. Tumor factors (location, volume), parameters related to irradiation to the tumor and cochlea, and distance between the tumor and cochlea were reviewed.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in the final analysis with a mean observation period following GKRS as 24.4 ± 27.8 months. Prior to GKRS, the average pure tone threshold at 500, 1k, 2k, and 4k Hz (PTA₄) was 51.0 ± 29.7 dB HL. After GKRS, the mean PTA₄ was 71.6 ± 33.3 dB HL. Significant independent odds ratios for hearing deterioration were 8.5 for extracanalicular tumors, 18.8 for more than 10 shots in GKRS, and 12.2 for a distance between the tumor center and cochlea modiolus less than 20 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant hearing deterioration was shown in 2 years after GKRS. Tumor location, number of radiation shots, and distance between the tumor and cochlea affected hearing level after GKRS.

Predictive Factors of Unfavorable Events After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) introduces risks to the facial nerve and auditory perception and may involve post-treatment complications such as pseudoprogression, hydrocephalus, and other cranial neuropathies. This study of patients with VS who underwent GKS investigated radiosurgical results, focusing on post-treatment complications and identifying the factors that predict such complications.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of all VS patients treated with the Perfexion Leksell Gamma Knife between November 2007 and October 2010 at our institution. Patients who underwent at least 12 months of clinical and radiologic assessments before and after GKS were included.

RESULTS

All 235 patients were included in the analyses reported here. The 5-year serviceable hearing and facial nerve preservation values were 73.9% and 94.3%, respectively. Following GKS, 43 patients (18.30%) showed pseudoprogression, 15 (6.38%) exhibited hydrocephalus, 22 (9.36%) showed trigeminal neuropathy, 14 (5.96%) showed vertigo, and 25 (10.64%) showed facial myokymia. According to multivariate analysis, solid tumor nature was significantly associated with pseudoprogression and patient age was significantly associated with hydrocephalus. Patients receiving margin doses ≥13 Gy had a significantly higher probability of loss of serviceable hearing. Patients with smaller tumors had a trigeminal nerve preservation rate comparable with patients harboring larger tumors. Patients receiving margin doses <13 Gy or older patients had a significantly higher probability of vestibular nerve dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Further prospective studies should be designed to provide further insight into the exact relationship between the predictive factors we investigated and post-treatment complications.

Outcomes in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma after Subtotal Resection and Adjuvant Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

The debate continues with a limited number of publications describing outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated with planned subtotal resection (STR) plus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Here we present our experience.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 22 patients with VS Koos grade III and IV who were treated with STR followed by SRS. Tumor volumes, facial nerve function, hearing preservation, and the presence of trigeminal neuropathy were noted. Spearman's rank test was used to correlate facial nerve grade with postoperative tumor residual tumor volume.

RESULTS

Tumor control was achieved in all patients with a mean follow-up of 28 months. No patient required other treatment beyond the original surgery and adjuvant SRS during this period. After a mean postoperative period of 28 months, 19/22 patients had excellent (House-Brackmann I or II) facial nerve function grading. Improved facial nerve function was positively correlated with larger residual tumor volume (rs = 0.63). Kaplan-Meier curve showed around 80% probability for regaining facial nerve function after initial deterioration. Four patients reported postoperative facial numbness at the side of surgery, with 3 cases showing improvement within a month. Temporary postoperative caudal cranial nerve dysfunction was observed in 2 patients.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid strategy of STR and adjuvant SRS provides patients with large VS excellent tumor control and a good clinical outcome.

Hearing Preservation after Low-dose Gamma Knife Radiosurgery of Vestibular Schwannomas

The objective of the retrospective study was to evaluate the factors associated with hearing preservation after low-dose Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) of vestibular schwannomas performed according to the modern standards. From January 2005 to September 2010, 141 consecutive patients underwent such treatment in Tokyo Women’s Medical University. Mean marginal dose was 11.9 Gy (range, 11–12 Gy). The doses for the brain stem, cranial nerves (V, VII, and VIII), and cochlea were kept below 14 Gy, 12 Gy, and 4 Gy, respectively. Out of the total cohort, 102 cases with at least 24 months follow-up were analyzed. Within the median follow-up of 56 months (range, 24–99 months) the crude tumor growth control was 92% (94 cases), whereas its actuarial rate at 5 years was 93%. Out of 49 patients with serviceable hearing on the side of the tumor before GKS, 28 (57%) demonstrated its preservation at the time of the last follow-up. No one evaluated factor, namely Gardner-Robertson hearing class before irradiation, Koos tumor stage, extension of the intrameatal part of the neoplasm up to fundus, nerve of tumor origin, presence of cystic changes in the neoplasm, and cochlea dose demonstrated statistically significant association with preservation of the serviceable hearing after radiosurgery. In conclusion, GKS of vestibular schwannomas performed according to the modern standards of treatment permits to preserve serviceable hearing on the side of the tumor in more than half of the patients. The actual causes of hearing deterioration after radiosurgery remain unclear.

Hearing Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas : Mechanism of Hearing Loss and How to Preserve Hearing

The use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) expanded to include the treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VSs) in 1969; since then, efforts to increase tumour control and to reduce cranial neuropathy have continued. Using the currently recommended marginal dose of 12-13 Gy, long-term reported outcomes after SRS include not only excellent tumour control rates of 92-100 % but also outstanding functional preservation of the trigeminal and facial nerves, with values of 92-100 % and 94-100 %, respectively. Nonetheless, hearing preservation remains in the range of 32-81 %. Previous studies have suggested possible prognostic factors of hearing preservation such as the Gardner-Robertson grade, radiation dose to the cochlea, transient volume expansion (TVE) after SRS, length of irradiated cochlear nerve, marginal dose to the tumour, and age. However, we still do not clearly understand why patients lose their hearing after SRS for VS.Relevant to these considerations, one study recently reported that the auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave V latency and waves I and V interval (IL_I-V) correlated well with intracanalicular pressure values and even with hearing level. The demonstration that ABR values, especially wave V latency and IL_I-V, correlate well with intracanalicular pressure suggests that patients with previously elevated intracanalicular pressure might have an increased chance of hearing loss on development of TVE, which has been recognised as a common phenomenon after SRS or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for intracranial schwannomas.In our experience, the ABR IL_I-V increased during the first 12 months after SRS for VSs in patients who lost their serviceable hearing. The effect of increased ABR IL_I-V on hearing outcome also became significant over time, especially at 12 months after SRS, and was more prominent in patients with poor initial pure-tone average (PTA) and/or ABR values. We hypothesise that patients with considerable intracanalicular pressure at the time of SRS are prone to lose their serviceable hearing due to the added intracanalicular pressure induced by TVE, which usually occurs within the first 12 months after SRS for VSs. Using these findings, we suggested a classification system for the prediction of hearing outcomes after SRS for VSs. This classification system could be useful in the proper selection of management modalities for hearing preservation, especially in patients with only hearing ear schwannoma or neurofibromatosis type 2.Advances in diagnostic tools, treatment modalities, and optimisation of radiosurgical dose have improved clinical outcomes, including tumour control and cranial neuropathies, in patients with VSs. However, the preservation of hearing function still falls short of our expectation. A prediction model for hearing preservation after each treatment modality will guide the proper selection of treatment modalities and permit the appropriate timing of active treatment, which will lead to the preservation of hearing function in patients with VSs.