Population-based 10-year oncologic outcomes after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer

Long-term evaluation of the safety of a rectal-prostate spacer, the ProSpace® balloon, in patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Due to the close proximity of the prostate and rectum, rectal toxicity remains a major problem in patient treated by radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. One method of increasing the distance between the prostate and the rectum is to use a spacer implanted into the rectoprostatic space. This report describes the long-term outcomes obtained with a new ballon spacer.

METHODS

Patients treated with curative radiotherapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma, who underwent insertion of the ProSpace® (BioProtect Ltd, Tzur Yigal, Israel) rectal-prostate balloon spacer, were included. The main objective was to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of the spacer for OARs. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of ProSpace® balloon placement and to evaluate its long-term therapeutic efficacy and tolerance.

RESULTS

Between October 2013 and March 2015, 16 patients were enrolled in the Pasteur Clinic, Toulouse, France. The median follow-up was 85.5 months. From top to bottom, the space created was a mean of 16.3 mm (range: 11-20.5 mm) at the base of the prostate, 12.1 mm (range: 4-16 mm) at the middle and 8.9 mm at the apex (range: 5-15 mm). On average, rectal volumes receiving a dose of 70 Gy, 60 Gy and 50 Gy were significantly lower after balloon implantation: -4.81 cc (1.5 vs. 6.3; p < 0.0005), -8.08 cc (6.4 vs. 14.5; p = 0.002) and -9.06 cc (16.7 vs. 25.7; p = 0.003), respectively. There were significant differences in coverage after balloon implantation: Median V95% (p < 0.0005), median Dmin (p = 0.01) and median V98% (p < 0.001) were higher after balloon implantation. At 5 years, cumulative gastrointestinal toxicity was grade 1 in 6% (1/16 patients). No toxicity of grade 2 or higher was found. At 5 years, no urinary toxicity grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found. The QoL was not deteriorated.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the ProSpace® balloon seems to be well accepted by patients, allowing a double dosimetric gain: a decrease in doses received by the rectum and an improvement in the coverage of the high-risk PTV. The long-term gastrointestinal toxicity remains low and QoL is preserved in all treated patients.

Long-term oncologic outcomes of low dose-rate brachytherapy compared to hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy for intermediate -risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of intermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) or moderate hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (HF-EBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients diagnosed with IR PCa and treated with LDR-BT or HF-EBRT between January 2005 and December 2013 were included. Brachytherapy treatment involved a transperineal implant of iodine-125 to a dose of 145 Gy to the PTV, while HF-EBRT was delivered using intensity modulated radiotherapy with 60 Gy in 20 fractions. The Phoenix ''nadir +2'' threshold was used to define biochemical relapse (BR). The cumulative incidence function (CIF) of BR and metastases was reported for each group and compared using the Gray's test to account for the competing risk of death. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer specific survival (PCSS). Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analysis of the CIF of BR and metastases were performed. A 2-tailed p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Overall, 122 and 124 patients were treated with LDR-BT and HF-EBRT respectively. Median follow-up was 95 months [interquartile range (IQR): 79-118] in the LDR-BT group and 96 months (IQR: 63-123) in the HF-EBRT group. BR was observed in 5 patients treated with LDR-BT and 34 treated with HF-EBRT. At 60 and 90 months, the CIF of BR was 0.9% and 3.5% in the LDR-BT group vs. 16.6% and 23.7% in the HF-EBRT (p < 0.001). The CIF of metastases at 90 and 108 months, was 0% and 1.6% vs. 3.4% and 9.1% in the LDR-BT and HF-EBRT groups (p = 0.003), respectively. At the last follow-up, 3 patients treated with HF-EBRT died from their cancer [PCSS of 97.5% at 8 years and none died in the LDR-BT group (p = 0.09). On UVA and MVA risk group and treatment modality were independently associated with CIF of BR. On UVA HF-EBRT and ISUP grade group 3 were associated with metastases.

CONCLUSION

LDR-BT was associated with higher biochemical and metastases control in our cohort when compared to moderately HF-EBRT. In the absence of a randomized trial, LDR-BT when feasible should be offered to patients with a life expectancy of >8 years.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a valid option for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In randomized trials, it was found not inferior to conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). It also compares favorably to brachytherapy (BT) even if level 1 evidence is lacking. However, BT remains a strong competitor, especially for young patients, as series with 10-15 years of median follow-up have proven its efficacy over time. SBRT will thus have to confirm its effectiveness over the long-term as well. SBRT has the advantage over BT of less acute urinary toxicity and, more hypothetically, less sexual impairment. Data are limited regarding SBRT for high-risk disease while BT, as a boost after EBRT, has demonstrated superiority against EBRT alone in randomized trials. However, patients should be informed of significant urinary toxicity. SBRT is under investigation in strategies of treatment intensification such as combination of EBRT plus SBRT boost or focal dose escalation to the tumor site within the prostate. Our goal was to examine respective levels of evidence of SBRT and BT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicity and quality of life, and to discuss strategies of treatment intensification.

MRI-defined treatment margins, urinary toxicity, and PSA response in LDR prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Implant quality metrics as measured by D90 and V100 do not address the adequacy of periprostatic margins. Relative margin deficiencies may relate to efficacy and margin excesses to post-implant toxicity. Our purpose is to determine MRI-defined treatment margins on prostate achieved with LDR brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Post implant CT and MR images from 487 consecutive patients who received LDR brachytherapy from 2010 to 14 were co-registered. Four prostate quadrants were defined; anterior-superior (AS), posterior-superior (PS), anterior-inferior (AI), posterior-inferior (PI). Dosimetric variables were measured for prostate, and for each quadrant with a 0-, 2-, 3-, and 5-mm margin, as well as for the membranous urethra defined on MRI.

RESULTS

Prostate D90 (no margin) was associated with D90 to the volume enclosed by 2 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm margins (R2 = 0.9 - 1.0) with an average 7.1% decrease in dose per mm of margin. Mean D90 for PS, AI and PI quadrants were > 110% of prescription dose for margins of 2-, 3-, and 5-mm. AS quadrant mean D90s were generally lower (83.2% for 2 mm, 76.4% for 3 mm and 62.2% for 5 mm). Urethral strictures (n = 9) were associated with higher doses in the AI quadrant, and higher membranous urethral V125 (51 vs. 32%, p 0.013) and V150 (34.5 vs. 17.6%, p 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Using MR-CT post implant dosimetry, margin coverage up to 5 mm was excellent with less margin coverage in the AS quadrant. Late ≥ grade 2 toxicity and urinary strictures are more likely to occur with relative margin excess in the anterior-inferior quadrant and higher doses caudal to the prostate apex. Within this analysis, there was no relationship between treatment margins, and PSA outcome.

Trends in Androgen Deprivation Use in Men with Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Who Underwent Radiotherapy

Purpose

Until 2018, National Cancer Comprehensive Network guidelines recommended androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for all men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who had undergone radiation therapy. Intermediate risk was stratified as favorable and unfavorable in 2018, and ADT recommendation was limited to men with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Data suggesting this stratification and treatment deintensification were first published in December 2013. This study characterizes US national trends for demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors associated with ADT use in men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who have undergone definitive radiation therapy.

Methods and Materials

This retrospective cohort study examined 108,185 men in the National Cancer Database who were diagnosed with intermediate-risk prostate cancer from 2004 to 2016. Temporal trends in demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors among men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer and associations with the use of ADT were characterized.

Results

In total, 108,185 men diagnosed with intermediate-risk prostate cancer underwent radiation therapy from 2004 to 2016. Of these men, 41.09% received ADT. Among the 60,705 men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, 32.06% received ADT. Among the 47,480 men with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, 52.64% received ADT. On multivariate analysis, use of ADT was associated with age and year of diagnosis; being a race other than White; having government-based insurance; having a higher prostate-specific antigen level, tumor stage, and Gleason score; receiving treatment at a nonacademic center; and receiving external beam radiation therapy alone.

Conclusions

The findings highlight that ADT use is variable in men undergoing definitive radiation therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with the data suggesting that several clinical and socioeconomic disparities influence its use. The findings suggest that a significant proportion of men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer receive ADT and remain candidates for treatment de-escalation, whereas a significant proportion of men with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer may be undertreated when ADT is omitted.

Robot-assisted salvage seminal vesicle excision for isolated recurrence after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

To report clinical and functional outcomes for patients who have undergone salvage robot-assisted seminal vesicle excision (RA-SVE) for the focal treatment of isolated seminal vesical (SV) recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer by low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) of the prostate and ¹¹ C-Choline or ⁶⁸ Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan, followed by targeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate and SVs. Isolated SV recurrence were identified in 17 (0.38%) LDR-PB patients. These 17 patients were offered RA-SVE.

RESULTS

The median total operative time was 90 min and blood loss 50 mL with no postoperative transfusions required. The median hospital stay was 1 day. No intra- or postoperative complications were documented. Continence status was unaffected, no patient required urinary pads. Postoperative pathology confirmed SV invasion in all specimens. Surgical margins were positive in seven (41%) patients. All patients had at least one positive imaging study, although three (18%) mp-MRI and five (29%) PET/CT assessments were negative. One (6%) pre-SVE biopsy was also negative but with positive imaging. Salvage SVE failure, defined as three consecutive PSA rises or the need for further treatment, occurred in six patients of whom three had a positive margin. Overall failure-free survival rates were 86%, 67%, and 53% at 1, 2, and 3 years after SVE, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage RA-SVE appears to be a safe focal treatment, with very low morbidity, for patients with localised SV recurrence after LDR-PB. It permits deferral of androgen deprivation therapy in selected patients. Bilateral SVE is mandatory. This surgical option should be considered in patients with isolated prostate cancer recurrence to the SV.

[Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Results, limits and prospects]

Still an emerging approach a few years ago, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has ranked as a valid option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Inherent properties of prostatic adenocarcinoma (low α/β) make it the perfect candidate. We propose a critical review of the literature trying to put results into perspective to identify their strengths, limits and axes of development. Technically sophisticated, the stereotactic irradiation of the prostate is well tolerated. Despite the fact that median follow-up of published data is still limited, ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy seems very efficient for the treatment of low and intermediate risk prostate cancers. Data seem satisfying for high-risk cancers as well. New developments are being studied with a main interest in treatment intensification for unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk cancers. Advantage is taken of the sharp dose gradient of stereotactic radiotherapy to offer safe reirradiation to patients with local recurrence in a previously irradiated area.

Medium-term oncological and functional outcomes of hemi-gland brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds for intermediate-risk unilateral prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To examine medium-term outcomes of hemi-gland low-dose-rate brachytherapy as a primary treatment for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS

We recruited intermediate-risk unilateral prostate cancer patients for a prospective trial of hemi-gland brachytherapy. Twenty-four patients underwent hemi-gland iodine-125 seed implantation with a prescribed dose of 160 Gy. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was measured regularly and follow-up biopsy was scheduled after 2-3 years of treatment. When clinically needed afterward, for-cause biopsy was performed to confirm pathology. Treatment failure (TF)-free survival, which was defined as freedom from radical or systemic therapy, metastases, and cancer-specific mortality, was assessed, as was biochemical failure (BF)-free survival. Urinary and sexual functions were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Median follow-up duration was 61 months. Twenty-two patients (92%) exhibited a declining trend or decreased value of PSA for 12 months or longer after the treatment. Follow-up biopsy in the initial triennium and for-cause biopsy in the subsequent triennium were performed in 16 and four patients, respectively, and cancer was found from the treated lobe in one patient (4% of the cohort) and significant cancer was found from untreated lobes in four patients (17%) in total. Secondary treatments were performed in six patients successfully. Five-year freedom from BF, TF, and metastasis was 71%, 90%, and 100%, respectively. The International Prostate Symptom Score significantly deteriorated at 3 months and reversed itself afterward. The International Index of Erectile Function 5 had no significant decrease.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemi-gland low-dose-rate brachytherapy provides favorable medium-term oncological outcomes with genito-urinary functional preservation for men with intermediate-risk unilateral prostate cancer.

Comparison of post-implant dosimetrics between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds and loose seeds by sector analysis at 24 hours and 1 month for localized prostate cancer

Purpose

To compare post-implant dosimetrics between intraoperatively built custom-linked (IBCL) seeds and loose seeds (LS) at 24 hours and 1 month by sector analysis, and to evaluate the effect of IBCL seeds with regard to change in dosimetric parameters, in patients with prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Consecutive patients treated for localized prostate cancer who received definitive brachytherapy between March 2013 and October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Prostate V₁₀₀ (PV₁₀₀), prostate D₉₀ (PD₉₀), prostate V₁₅₀ (PV₁₅₀), urethral D₃₀ (UD₃₀), urethral V₁₅₀ (UV₁₅₀), and rectal V₁₀₀ (RV₁₀₀) were assessed.

Results

Thirty-two patients were treated with LS and 32 patients were treated with IBCL seeds. The median follow-up time was 49.9 months in the LS group and 27.1 months in the IBCL group. PV₁₅₀, UV₁₅₀, and UD₃₀ at 24 hours and UD₃₀ at 1 month showed significant difference (F-test), and standard deviation (SD) tended to be lower in the IBCL group. Analysis of change in the variables revealed significance for ΔPV₁₀₀ and ΔPD₉₀ (F-test, p = 0.014 and < 0.001, respectively), and ΔPV₁₅₀ and ΔUD₃₀ showed marginal significance (p = 0.084 and 0.097, respectively). PV₁₅₀, UV₁₅₀, and UD₃₀ at 24 hours and 1 month were significantly lower in the IBCL group, and there was no significant difference in PV₁₀₀, PD₉₀, and RV₁₀₀ compared with the LS group (t-test). The homogeneity index (HI) was significantly higher in the IBCL group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this retrospective single institutional study, there was a decrease in the SD of the dosimetric parameters in the IBCL group, and it was statistically significant in change in the variables between 24 hours and 1 month (F-test). The use of IBCL seeds significantly decreased PV₁₅₀, UV₁₅₀, and UD₃₀, and significantly improved HI, without lowering PD₉₀ or PD₁₀₀.

Ablative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy

Simple Summary

Radiation therapy is a standard of care treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer. Over the years, various radiation delivery modalities have contributed to the increased precision of radiation, employing radiobiological insights to shorten the overall treatment time with hypofractionation, while improving oncological control without increasing toxicities. Here, we discuss and compare two ablative radiation modalities, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT), in terms of oncological control, dose/fractionation and toxicities in men with localized prostate cancer. This review will highlight the levels of evidence available to support either modality as a monotherapy, will summarize safety and efficacy, help clinicians gain a deeper understanding of the safety and efficacy profiles of these two modalities, and highlight ongoing research efforts to address many unanswered questions regarding ablative prostate radiation.

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous solid organ malignancy among men worldwide. Radiation therapy is a standard of care treatment option that has historically been delivered in the form of small daily doses of radiation over the span of multiple weeks. PCa appears to have a unique sensitivity to higher doses of radiation per fraction, rendering it susceptible to abbreviated forms of treatment. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) are both modern radiation modalities that allow the precise delivery of ablative doses of radiation to the prostate while maximally sparing sensitive surrounding normal structures. In this review, we highlight the evidence regarding the radiobiology, oncological outcomes, toxicity and dose/fractionation schemes of SBRT and HDRBT monotherapy in men with low-and intermediate-risk PCa.

A novel and fast methodology to calculate doses in LDR brachytherapy

We present the concept of a new methodology for faster simulation of the doses in brachytherapy with permanent implants, based on the knowledge of the seeds arrangement, adding previously simulated doses in an equivalent medium in terms of the atomic composition of the organ in question. To perform the doses calculations we use Monte Carlo simulations. We simulated a cylindrical I-125 seed and compared our results against published data. Our proposal is to have the doses simulated previously in different arrangement of seed-absorbents, and then, considering the spacial positions of the seeds after the implants, these doses can be directly added, obtaining a very fast computation of the total dose. Two phantoms of prostates with permanent implant seeds in 2D and 3D arrangements were simulated. The results of the proposed methodology were compared with two complete Monte Carlo simulations in 2D and 3D designs. Differences in doses were analysed, obtaining statistical discrepancies of less than 1% and reducing the simulation time by more than 4 orders of magnitude. With the proposed methodology, it is possible to perform rapid dose calculations in brachytherapy, using laptop or desktop computers.

The 100 most cited articles in prostate cancer brachytherapy: systematic review and bibliometric analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify the 100 most cited research articles in prostate cancer brachytherapy (PCB) and to review the characteristics of these citation.

Material and methods

The Web of Science Core Collection was used to identify the 100 most cited articles in PCB as of December 31^st, 2019. The following important information was extracted: year and month of publication, title, journal, country of origin, authors, type of article, treatment modality, and topics.

Results

The 100 most cited articles in PCB were published between 1999 and 2018, and the number of citations ranged from 455 to 54; these articles had collectively been cited 10,331 times at the time of search. These articles were from 11 countries, with most publications being from the United States (n = 61), followed by Canada (n = 10), the United Kingdom (n = 8), and Germany (n = 5). The “International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics” published the most articles (n = 47), followed by the “Journal of Urology” (n = 11), “Radiotherapy and Oncology” (n = 10), “Cancer” (n = 7), and “Urology” (n = 6). Permanent interstitial brachytherapy (n = 52) was the most widely used treatment modality, followed by temporary brachytherapy (n = 45). Disease control (n = 51) was the most common topic, followed by side effects (n = 44) and quality of life (n = 27).

Conclusions

The bibliometric analysis presents a detailed list of the 100 most cited articles in prostate cancer brachytherapy. There are clear recommendations for treatment with prostate cancer brachytherapy. The goal of prostate cancer brachytherapy is to improve long-term outcomes and quality of life.

Analysis of outcomes after non-contour-based dose painting of dominant intra-epithelial lesion in intra-operative low-dose rate brachytherapy

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa) treated with low-dose rate I-125 seed brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and targeted dose painting of a histologic dominant intra-epithelial lesion (DIL) to those without a DIL.

Methods

455 patients with IR-PCa were treated at a single center with intra-operatively planned LDR-BT, each following the same in-house dose constraints. Patients with a DIL on pathology had hot spots localized to that region but no specific contouring during the procedure.

Results

396 (87%) patients had a DIL. Baseline tumor characteristics and overall prostate dosimetry were similar between patients with and without DIL except the median number of biopsy cores taken: 10 (10–12) vs 12 (10–12) (p = 0.002).

19 (5%) and 18 (5%) of patients with and 1 (2%) and 0 (0%) of those without DIL experienced CTCAE grade 2 and 3 toxicity respectively. Overall, toxicity grade did not significantly correlate with presence of DIL (p = 0.10).

Estimated 7-year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) was 84% (95% confidence interval: 79–89) and 70% (54–89) in patients with and without a DIL (log-rank p = 0.315). In DIL patients, cox regression revealed location of DIL (“Base” vs “Apex” HR: 1.03; 1.00–1.06; p = 0.03) and older age (70 vs 60 HR: 1.62; 1.06–2.49; p = 0.03) was associated with poor FFBF.

Conclusions

Targeting DIL through dose painting during intraoperatively planned LDR-BT provided no statistically significant change in FFBF. Patients with DILs in the prostate base had slightly lower FFBF despite DIL boost.

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a relatively novel form of high precision radiotherapy. For low- and intermediate risk patients, ultrahypofractionation (UHF - more than 5 Gy per day) has been compared to conventionally fractionated or moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in two large randomized studies. A third smaller randomized study examined the question of the optimal frequency of treatments. The results of these studies will be reviewed. SABR for high risk prostate cancer has been shown to be feasible and is well tolerated with careful planning and setup techniques. However, there is currently insufficient data supporting its use for high-risk patients to offer SABR outside of a clinical trial. SABR costs less to the radiotherapydepartments and, the patient, as well as increasing system capacity. Therefore, it has the potential to be widely adopted in the next few years.

Brachytherapy: An overview for clinicians

Brachytherapy is a specific form of radiotherapy consisting of the precise placement of radioactive sources directly into or next to the tumor. This technique is indicated for patients affected by various types of cancers. It is an optimal tool for delivering very high doses to the tumor focally while minimizing the probability of normal tissue complications. Physicians from a wide range of specialties may be involved in either the referral to or the placement of brachytherapy. Many patients require brachytherapy as either primary treatment or as part of their oncologic care. On the basis of high-level evidence from randomized controlled trials, brachytherapy is mainly indicated: 1) as standard in combination with chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer; 2) in surgically treated patients with uterine endometrial cancer for decreasing the risk of vaginal vault recurrence; 3) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer to perform dose escalation and improve progression-free survival; and 4) in patients with breast cancer as adjuvant, accelerated partial breast irradiation or to boost the tumor bed. In this review, the authors discuss the clinical relevance of brachytherapy with a focus on indications, levels of evidence, and results in the overall context of radiation use for patients with cancer.

Quality of life outcomes after low dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: Current status and future perspectives

The present review summarizes data from studies reporting on health-related quality of life after brachytherapy and competing modalities. There are various therapeutic modalities for localized prostate cancer, including radical surgery, external beam radiotherapy and active surveillance. Advances in surgical and radiation treatment have entered clinical practice in the form of robot-assisted surgery or intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Brachytherapy remains the main treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer, with 10-year survival data showing favorable outcomes. Because each treatment modality has achieved favorable survival outcomes, focus in determining appropriate treatment has shifted toward health-related quality of life, where each treatment has a different profile and/or adverse symptoms. The development of health-related quality of life assessment tools has allowed the creation of a pool of specific health-related quality of life data across many studies. The present article reviews the impact of brachytherapy and other modalities on quality of life, as well as future directions.

Prostate brachytherapy with iodine-125 seeds: analysis of a single institutional cohort

Objectives:

Brachytherapy (BT) with iodine-125 seeds placement is a consolidated treatment for prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate (LDR) -BT alone in a single Brazilian institution.

Materials and Methods:

Patients treated with iodine-125 BT were retrospectively assessed after at least 5 years of follow-up. Patients who received combination therapy (External beam radiation therapy-EBRT and BT) and salvage BT were not included.

Results:

406 men were included in the study (65.5% low-risk, 30% intermediate-risk, and 4.5% high-risk patients). After a median follow-up of 87.5 months, 61 (15.0%) patients developed biochemical recurrence. The actuarial biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) at 5 and 10 years were 90.6% and 82.2%, respectively. A PSA nadir ≥ 1 ng / mL was associated with a higher risk of biochemical failure (HR = 5.81; 95% CI: 3.39 to 9.94; p ≤ 0.001). The actuarial metastasis-free survival (MFS) at 5 and 10 years were 98.3% and 94%, respectively. The actuarial overall survival (OS) at 5 and 10 years were 96.2% and 85.1%, respectively. Acute and late grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in 5.6%, 0.5%, 4.6% and 0.5% of cases, respectively. For genitourinary the observed acute and late grade 2 and 3 toxicities rates were 57.3%, 3.6%, 28% and 3.1%, respectively. No grade 4 and 5 were observed.

Conclusions:

BT was effective as a definitive treatment modality for prostate cancer, and its endpoints and toxicities were comparable to those of the main series in the literature.

Accurate and robust deep learning-based segmentation of the prostate clinical target volume in ultrasound images

The goal of this work was to develop a method for accurate and robust automatic segmentation of the prostate clinical target volume in transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images for brachytherapy. These images can be difficult to segment because of weak or insufficient landmarks or strong artifacts. We devise a method, based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), that produces accurate segmentations on easy and difficult images alike. We propose two strategies to achieve improved segmentation accuracy on difficult images. First, for CNN training we adopt an adaptive sampling strategy, whereby the training process is encouraged to pay more attention to images that are difficult to segment. Secondly, we train a CNN ensemble and use the disagreement among this ensemble to identify uncertain segmentations and to estimate a segmentation uncertainty map. We improve uncertain segmentations by utilizing the prior shape information in the form of a statistical shape model. Our method achieves Hausdorff distance of 2.7 ± 2.3 mm and Dice score of 93.9 ± 3.5%. Comparisons with several competing methods show that our method achieves significantly better results and reduces the likelihood of committing large segmentation errors. Furthermore, our experiments show that our approach to estimating segmentation uncertainty is better than or on par with recent methods for estimation of prediction uncertainty in deep learning models. Our study demonstrates that estimation of model uncertainty and use of prior shape information can significantly improve the performance of CNN-based medical image segmentation methods, especially on difficult images.

Effectiveness of Rotating Shield Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer Dose Escalation and Urethral Sparing

PURPOSE

To compare single-fraction 153Gd-based rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT) for prostate cancer with conventional 192Ir-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in a planning study that radiobiologically accounts for dose rate and relative biological effectiveness. RSBT was used for planning target volume (PTV) dose escalation without increasing urethral dose for monotherapy, or for urethral sparing without decreasing PTV dose as a boost to external beam radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-six patients were studied. PTV doses were expressed as equivalent dose delivered in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2), accounting for relative biological effectiveness (1.00 for 192Ir and 1.15 for 153Gd), dose protraction (114-minute repair half-time), and tumor dose response (α/β of 3.41 Gy). HDR-BT dose was prescribed such that 90% of the PTV received 110% of the prescription dose of 19 Gy for dose escalation and 15 Gy for urethral sparing, corresponding to EQD290% values (minimum EQD2 to the hottest 90% of the PTV) of 93.9 GyEQD2 and 60.7 GyEQD2, respectively. Twenty 90.95 GBq 153Gd RSBT sources and one 370 GBq 192Ir HDR-BT source were modeled.

RESULTS

For dose escalation with fresh sources, RSBT increased PTV EQD290% by 42.5% ± 8.4% (average ± standard deviation) without increasing urethral D10%, with treatment times of 216.8 ± 28.9 minutes versus 15.1 ± 2.1 minutes. After 1 half-life (240.4 days for 153Gd and 73.8 days for 192Ir), EQD290% increased 20.5% ± 9.1%. For urethral sparing with fresh sources, RSBT decreased urethral D10% by 26.0% ± 3.4% without decreasing PTV EQD290%, with treatment times of 133.6 ± 16.5 minutes versus 12.0 ± 1.7 minutes. After 1 half-life, urethral D10% decreased 20.2% ± 4.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

RSBT can increase PTV EQD90% or decrease urethral D10% relative to HDR-BT at the cost of increased treatment time. Source aging reduces RSBT benefit, but RSBT remains theoretically superior to HDR-BT by >20% after 1 half-life has elapsed.

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy as a minimally invasive curative treatment for localised prostate cancer has excellent oncological and functional outcomes: a retrospective analysis from a single centre

Introduction

Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy is a widely used therapeutic option for localised prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to analyse the oncological and functional outcomes after 10 years of experience with brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer.

Material and methods

All patients who underwent brachytherapy between April 2006 and September 2017 were included for analysis. Initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, tumour stages, Gleason scores, positive biopsies, prostate volumes, dosimetric parameters, and urinary symptoms were noted.

Results

A total of 201 patients underwent brachytherapy between April 2006 and September 2017. Of these patients, 159 had >3 years of oncological and functional follow-up. Only these relevant patients were included in the statistical analysis. This showed a significant, persistent decline in PSA levels (p <0.0001): the mean PSA was 1.2 ng/ml after 6 months, 1.1 ng/ml after 1 year, and 0.49 ng/ml after 3 years. Only 9 patients had tumour recurrence (3 patients with Gleason score 6 and 6 patients with Gleason score 7). After receiving adequate treatment, the patients underwent oncological follow-up.

Important obstructive and irritative complaints were most pronounced during the first 9 months and decreased strongly after 18 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

LDR brachytherapy has excellent oncological outcomes with limited functional inconveniences that are adequately treatable. Our 10 years' experience shows that brachytherapy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of low-risk localised prostate cancer.

Plan reproducibility of intraoperatively custom-built linked seeds compared to loose seeds for prostate brachytherapy

Purpose

Few studies have compared the implant quality of linked and loose seeds for prostate brachytherapy. This study aimed to evaluate and compare plan reproducibility of intraoperatively built custom linked seeds and loose seeds for prostate brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Between December 2010 and March 2014, 76 localized prostate cancer patients received Iodine-125 brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy. Linked and loose seeds were implanted in 39 and 37 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was the mean (± standard deviation) of the absolute change in the minimum dose received by 90% of the prostate volume between intraoperative and post-operative planning (ΔD₉₀) to confirm plan reproducibility. Comparisons between the groups were evaluated using 2-sample t tests.

Results

The ΔD₉₀ values were 6.95 ± 11.6% and –0.41 ± 8.5% for the loose and linked seed groups, respectively (p < 0.01). The linked seed group showed decreased post-operative D₉₀ (118.8% vs. 127.2%), V₁₅₀ (51.7% vs. 66.7%), and RV₁₀₀ (0.44 ml vs. 0.61 ml) compared to the loose seed group (p < 0.01), whereas lung migration tended to be reduced (0% vs. 8%).

Conclusions

The plan reproducibility of the linked seed group was better than that of the loose seed group. Moreover, the linked seed group showed less migration and lower rectal dose.

Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy

Low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy is an evidence based radiation technique with excellent oncologic outcomes. By utilizing direct image guidance for radioactive source placement, LDR brachytherapy provides superior radiation dose escalation and conformality compared to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). With this level of precision, late grade 3 or 4 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity rates are typically between 1% and 4%. Furthermore, when performed as a same day surgical procedure, this technique provides a cost effective and convenient strategy. A large body of literature with robust follow-up has led multiple expert consensus groups to endorse the use of LDR brachytherapy as an appropriate management option for all risk groups of non-metastatic prostate cancer. LDR brachytherapy is often effective when delivered as a monotherapy, although for some patients with intermediate or high-risk disease, optimal outcome are achieved in combination with supplemental EBRT and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In addition to reviewing technical aspects and reported clinical outcomes of LDR prostate brachytherapy, this article will focus on the considerations related to appropriate patient selection and other aspects of its use in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Results of 14 years of brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer in Denmark: the Herlev cohort

OBJECTIVE

Brachytherapy is one of several curative treatments for localized prostate cancer (PCa). The objective of this study was to report biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastatic-free survival (MFS) and PCa-specific mortality after low-dose brachytherapy, stratified according to the D'Amico risk classification in a large Danish cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population comprised 502 men treated with brachytherapy in 1998-2012. BRFS was defined by the Phoenix criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate BRFS and MFS. The cumulative PCa mortality was analysed using competing risk analyses. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to estimate risk of biochemical recurrence.

RESULTS

In total, 206 men were classified with low-risk PCa, 265 men with intermediate-risk PCa and 33 men with high-risk PCa. Median follow-up was 6.6 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2-7.0]. The 10 year BRFS was 90% (95% CI 83-97), 75% (95% CI 65-87) and 75% (95% CI 59-92) in men with low-, intermediate- and high-risk PCa, respectively. The 10 year MFS was 95% (95% CI 89-100), 93% (95% CI 88-98) and 78% (95% CI 57-99) in men with low-, intermediate- and high-risk PCa, respectively. The 10 year cumulative incidence of PCa mortality was 1% (95% CI 0-3), 5% (95% CI 0-12) and 11% (95% CI 0-25) for men with low-, intermediate- and high-risk PCa, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose brachytherapy offers good short- to intermediate-term cancer control in selected men with localized PCa. Further studies are needed for safety analyses and for comparison with other treatment modalities.

Correlations of post-implant regional dosimetric parameters at 24 hours and one month, with clinical results of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the correlations of post-implant regional dosimetrics at 24 hours (24 h) and 1 month after implant procedures, with clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Material and methods

Between January 2008 and December 2014, 130 consecutive patients treated for localized prostate cancer, receiving definitive iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) brachytherapy treatment were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent post-implant CT imaging for dosimetric analysis at 24 h and 1 month after implantation procedure. Prostate contours were divided into quadrants: anterior-superior (ASQ), posterior-superior (PSQ), anterior-inferior (AIQ), and posterior-inferior (PIQ). Predictive factors and cut-off values of biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and toxicities of LDR brachytherapy were analyzed.

Results

The median follow-up time was 69.5 months. Seven patients (5.4%) had biochemical failure. The 3-year and 5-year BFFS rates were 96.7% and 93.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score were significant prognostic factors for biochemical failure. D₉₀ (the minimal dose received by 90% of the volume) of PSQ and PIQ at 24 h, and D₉₀ of PSQ at 1 month were also significant factors. The cut-off values of PSQ D₉₀ were 145 Gy at 24 h and 160 Gy at 1 month. D₉₀ of the whole prostate was not significant at 24 h and at 1 month. D₉₀ of PSQ at 1 month was a significant factor for rectal hemorrhage.

Conclusions

Post-implant D₉₀ of PSQ is significantly associated with BFFS for localized prostate cancer not only at 1 month, but also at 24 hours. D₉₀ of PSQ at 1 month is also a significant factor for rectal hemorrhage.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A "Game Changer" for Prostate Treatment?

Radiation therapy to the prostate involves increasingly sophisticated delivery techniques and changing fractionation schedules. With a low estimated α/β ratio, a larger dose per fraction would be beneficial, with moderate fractionation schedules rapidly becoming a standard of care. The integration of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and linear accelerator allows for accurate soft tissue tracking with the capacity to replan for the anatomy of the day. Extreme hypofractionation schedules become a possibility using the potentially automated steps of autosegmentation, MRI-only workflow, and real-time adaptive planning. The present report reviews the steps involved in hypofractionated adaptive MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy and addresses the challenges for implementation.

Clinical outcomes of 125I brachytherapy with and without external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: results from 300 patients at a single institution in Japan

The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes and adverse events for 300 men with prostate cancer treated with 125iodine (125I) brachytherapy with and without external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) at a single institution in Japan. Between February 2005 and November 2011, 300 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with 125I brachytherapy at the Nagoya University Hospital. A total of 271 men were treated with implants with doses of 145 Gy, and 29 men were treated with implants with doses of 110 Gy combined with EBRT (40-50 Gy/20-25 fractions). The median patient age was 69 years (range, 53-83 years). The median follow-up period was 53 months (range, 5-99 months). According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification, 132 men (44%) had low-risk, 147 men (29%) had intermediate-risk and 21 men (7%) had high-risk disease. The 5-year overall survival rate, biochemical relapse-free survival rate, and disease-specific survival rates were 93.5%, 97.3% and 98.5%, respectively. Two men (0.6%) died of prostate cancer and 10 men (3.3%) died of other causes. Seventeen men (5.6%) experienced Grade 2 rectal bleeding in all: 12 (41.4%) of 29 in brachytherapy with EBRT, and 5 (1.8%) of 271 in brachytherapy alone. The rates of Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicity were 1.0% and 1.7%, respectively. Excellent local control was achieved at our hospital for localized prostate cancer with 125I brachytherapy with and without EBRT. Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were acceptable.

Dosimetry advantages of intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds compared with loose seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the implant quality between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds (IBCL) and loose seeds (LS) retrospectively.

Material and methods

This study included 74 prostate cancer patients who were treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) using IBCL (n = 37) or LS (n = 37) between July 2014 and June 2016. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, seed migration, and operation time were compared between the IBCL and LS groups. In addition to the standard target volume of the whole prostate gland, DVH parameters for prostate plus a 3 mm margin (CTV) were evaluated.

Results

In intraoperative planning, prostate V₁₅₀ was lower (54.8% vs. 59.6%, p = 0.027), and CTV V₁₀₀ (88.1% vs. 85.6%, p = 0.019) and D₉₀ (98.5% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.0033) were higher in the IBCL group compared with in the LS group. In post-implant dosimetry, prostate V₁₀₀ (96.9% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.020), CTV V₁₀₀ (85.6% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.046), and CTV D₉₀ (94.2% vs. 86.5%, p < 0.001) were higher, and prostate V₁₅₀ (57.1% vs. 64.5%, p = 0.0051) and CTV V₁₅₀ (31.5% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.046) were lower in the IBCL group compared with in the LS group. Regarding DVH changes between intraoperative planning and post-implant dosimetry, the decrease in prostate D₉₀ was significantly lower in the IBCL group than in the LS group (–1.16% vs. –4.17%, p < 0.001). For the IBCL group, the operation time was slightly but significantly longer than that for the LS group (50.5 minutes vs. 43.7 minutes, p = 0.011). However, the seed migration rate was significantly lower in the IBCL group than in the LS group (5% vs. 41%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intraoperatively built custom-linked is more advantageous than LS in terms of dosimetric parameters and migration.

High-intermediate prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy

PURPOSE

To describe outcomes of men with unfavorable (high-tier) intermediate risk prostate cancer (H-IR) treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, with or without 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with H-IR prostate cancer, treated before 2012 with LDR brachytherapy without external radiation are included. Baseline tumor characteristics are described. Outcomes between groups receiving ADT are measured by Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL), and threshold 0.4 ng/mL biochemical relapse definitions (bNEDs), as well as clinical end points. Standard descriptive and actuarial statistics are used.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty men were eligible, 139 (53%) did not receive ADT and 121 (47%) did. Median follow-up was 5 years. Men treated with ADT had higher T stage and percent positive cores but lower pathologic grade group. bNED rates with and without ADT at 5 years are 86% and 85% (p = 0.52) with the Phoenix definition, and 83% and 78% (p = 0.13) with the threshold definition. Local recurrence or metastasis were rare in both groups (<5%, p = not significant). Death from prostate cancer only occurred in 4 patients, 2 in each group. Overall survival was 85% in those treated with ADT and 93% without at 8 years, p = 0.15.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of 6 months of ADT to LDR brachytherapy for H-IR prostate cancer does not improve 5 year prostate specific antigen control, and we no longer routinely recommended it.

Follow-up Care for Survivors of Prostate Cancer - Clinical Management: a Program in Evidence-Based Care Systematic Review and Clinical Practice Guideline

AIMS

This clinical practice guideline was developed to provide evidence-based guidance on the frequency by which prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels should be tested in men after curative-intent treatment for prostate cancer and to define the most appropriate diagnostic testing if biochemical recurrence occurs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search using OVID was used to systematically search the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for systematic reviews and primary literature. A systematic review and practice guideline was written, reviewed and approved by the Guideline Development Group (GDG) and Program in Evidence-Based Care Report Approval Panel. External review by three prostate experts was completed, as well as an online consultation with healthcare professionals who were intended users of the guideline.

RESULTS

Three systematic reviews and seven primary studies were included in the evidence base. All identified literature reported on diagnostic imaging properties of diagnostic tests following biochemical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to a lack of empirical research, few evidenced-based recommendations could be made with respect to a follow-up schedule of PSA testing for prostate cancer survivors following curative-intent treatment, or detailing diagnostic testing upon detection of biochemical recurrence. Accordingly, the GDG focused substantial effort on critical examination of the identified evidence, existing clinical practice guidelines and on obtaining clinical expertise consensus using a modified Delphi method. Overall, the recommendations embedded in this guideline reflect the best practice to date for the efficient and effective clinical follow-up care of prostate cancer survivors.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy versus Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: a Cost-Utility Analysis

AIMS

To conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for localised prostate cancer (PCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov model was developed from the healthcare payer perspective to simulate the history of a 66-year-old man with low-risk PCa. The model followed patients yearly over their remaining lifetimes. Health states included 'recurrence-free', 'biochemical recurrence' (BR), 'metastatic' and 'death'. Transition probabilities were based on a retrospective cohort analysis undertaken at our institution. Utilities were derived from the literature. Costs were assigned in 2015 Canadian dollars ($) and reflected Ontario's health system and departmental costs. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY was used.

RESULTS

SBRT was the dominant strategy with 0.008LYs and 0.029QALYs gained and a reduction in cost of $2615. Under base case conditions, our results were sensitive to the BR probability associated with both strategies. LDR-BT becomes the preferred strategy if the BR with SBRT is 1.3*[baseline BR_SBRT] or if the BR with LDR-BT is 0.76*[baseline BR_LDR-BT]. When assuming the same BR for both strategies, LDR-BT becomes marginally more effective with 0.009QALYs gained at a cost of $272 848/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT represents an economically attractive radiation strategy. Further research should be carried out to provide longer-term follow-up and high-quality evidence.

Brachytherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer, Androgen Deprivation, and the Risk of Death

PURPOSE

To determine whether the use of 6 months' adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with brachytherapy for intermediate-risk (IR) and low-risk (LR) prostate cancer is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from men treated in the British Columbia Cancer Agency brachytherapy program from 1998 to 2012. Men were categorized by risk group and ADT use. Cardiac and other comorbidities were recorded and compared between groups. Biochemical control (Phoenix definition, nadir + 2 ng/mL) was ascertained. Overall, prostate, cardiac, and other-cause mortality were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Fine and Gray competing-risk analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 3155 men (1142 with LR cancer and 2013 with IR cancer) who have been followed up for a median of 7.9 years. ADT was received by 47% of IR patients and 37% of LR patients for a median of 6 months. Men with IR cancer were older and had more cardiac and other comorbidities than LR cases (P<.01). Biochemical control improved from 86% to 89% at 10 years with the use of ADT (P=.006). Overall survival was inferior in patients receiving ADT (84% vs 86% at 10 years, P=.0274), and on competing-risk analysis, cardiovascular mortality in patients receiving ADT was higher in IR cases, 5.2% versus 3.6% at 10 years (P=.0493), but not in LR cases. Multivariate analysis confirmed increased cardiac mortality in IR patients receiving ADT (hazard ratio, 1.95 [95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.34]; P=.014).

CONCLUSIONS

ADT adds little meaningful benefit in terms of biochemical control for IR men treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy but likely decreases overall survival because of increased cardiac mortality. IR patients were older and had more cardiac risk factors than LR prostate cases; this may be because of a screening effect, case selection, or common etiologic cause.

Long-term oncological outcomes and toxicity in 597 men aged ≤60 years at time of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To report oncological and functional outcomes of men treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy aged ≤60 years at time of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 3262 patients treated with LDR brachytherapy at our centre up to June 2016, we retrospectively identified 597 patients aged ≤60 years at treatment with ≥3-years post-implantation follow-up and four prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements, of which one was at baseline. Overall survival (OS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) and relapse free survival (RFS) were analysed together with prospectively collected physician-reported adverse events and patient-reported symptom scores.

RESULTS

The median (range) age was 57 (44-60) years, follow-up was 8.9 (1.5-17.2) years, and PSA follow-up 5.9 (0.8-15) years. Low-, intermediate- and high-risk disease represented 53%, 37% and 10% of the patients, respectively. At 10 years after implantation OS and PCSS were 98% and 99% for low-risk, 99% and 100% for intermediate-risk, and 93% and 95% for high-risk disease, respectively. At 10 years after implantation RFS, using the PSA level nadir plus 2 ng/mL definition, was 95%, 90% and 87% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, respectively. Urinary stricture was the most common genitourinary adverse event occurring in 19 patients (3.2%). At 5 years after implantation erectile function was preserved in 75% of the patients who were potent before treatment.

CONCLUSION

LDR brachytherapy is an effective treatment with long-term control of prostate cancer in men aged ≤60 years at time of treatment. It was associated with low rates of treatment-related toxicity and can be considered a first-line treatment for prostate cancer in this patient group.

Multicenter Evaluation of Biochemical Relapse-Free Survival Outcomes for Intraoperatively Planned Prostate Brachytherapy Using an Automated Delivery System

PURPOSE

To report biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer treated with intraoperatively planned low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using an automated delivery system (IO-LDRB).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2003 and 2013, 2608 patients from 3 centers were treated with IO-LDRB as single-modality treatment for low or low-tier intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Databases from the 3 centers have been analyzed. These independent databases were collected prospectively. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were then compared, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) were generated, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors predicting for relapse.

RESULTS

A total of 2608 patients with a median follow-up of 4.7 (interquartile range, 3.1-6.9) years were analyzed. Median age was 64 (range, 42-84) years. In these patients, median initial prostate-specific antigen was 5.5 ng/mL, 74% were T1, and 26% were T2; 73% were Gleason 6, and 25% Gleason 7. Median percentage of biopsy cores positive was 33%, and median gland volume was 34.2 cm³. Eleven percent of patients received hormones for a median of 3.0 months before implantation. Median seed activity was 0.437 mCi, D90 (dose covering 90% of the prostate volume) was 186.7 Gy, and V100 was 99.37%. Biochemical relapse was observed in 124 patients (4.8%), and median time to failure was 4.0 years. Predicted bRFS was 93% at 7 years. On Cox regression bRFS was dependent only on D90 at the time of implantation and prostate-specific antigen density.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that IO-LDRB is an effective treatment option for patients with low and low-tier intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Rates of biochemical relapse remain low several years after treatment. These results compared favorably to published manual preplan technique results.

Unexpected Seed Migration in Prostate Brachytherapy Implants Coincident with Change in Seed Stranding Product

Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine if significant seed migration occurred when our institution changed seed products by comparing patterns of seed migration in implants containing different stranding material.

Methods and Materials: Day 0 and Day 30 CT scans were registered by the contoured prostate center of mass. An implant reconstruction program identified seeds on CT according to the pre-plan, enabling one-to-one correspondence between Day 0 and Day 30 seeds. Significant seed migration was defined by review of seeds that migrated > 2 cm outside the prostate or appearance in unexpected locations.   Results: Twenty-five (149, 16.8%) new strands displayed movement > 2 cm between Day 0 and Day 30 compared with just 2/118 (1.7%) of the standard strands. Six out of 26 (23%) patients with new strands displayed significant migration compared with 2/13 (14%) of patients with standard strands. In the six patients with new strands and significant migration, a mean of four strands (17%, range: 2-8 per patient) migrated significantly with 65% due to whole strand migration, 25% due to strand breakage, and 10% strand clumping. In the control group, only two strands (2%) migrated significantly, both due to strand breakage. Despite the greater seed movement with the new strands, Day 0 and Day 30 dosimetry was acceptable.

Conclusion: In this short report, we identified that a change to a new strand type was associated with unexpected significant seed movement compared to our typical strands. Since seed movement can arise from unexpected causes, it is important to maintain quality assurance practices when a change in technique or infrastructure is instituted.

Institutional long-term outcomes at the first Canadian center performing intraoperatively planned low-dose-rate brachytherapy alone in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to report the long-term outcomes and toxicities from a large cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate intraoperatively planned brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Prostate-specific antigen levels, urinary symptoms, and erectile function were recorded at baseline, and each followup visit was then entered into a prospective database. Urinary toxicity requiring procedural intervention was retrospectively verified using an integrated electronic medical system. A separate cross-sectional survey was performed to measure postimplant sexual function.

RESULTS

A total of 822 patients with low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated at our institution between 2003 and 2013. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for biochemical recurrence for our cohort were 95% and 87% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Cystoscopy, transurethral resection of prostate, or dilatation was required for 7.1% of 720 patients with more than 2 years of followup. At a median followup of 3.7 years, 64.4% of patients retained adequate erectile function for intercourse, with 54% of patients who were no longer sexually active postimplant reporting social factors as the primary reason.

CONCLUSIONS

Our institutional experience with intraoperative low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy yielded excellent long-term results with a low incidence of urinary and sexual toxicity.

Clinical use of magnetic resonance imaging across the prostate brachytherapy workflow

MRI produces better soft tissue contrast than does ultrasonography or computed tomography for visualizing male pelvic anatomy and prostate cancer. Better visualization of the tumor and organs at risk could allow better conformation of the dose to the target volumes while at the same time minimizing the dose to critical structures and the associated toxicity. Although the use of MRI for prostate brachytherapy would theoretically result in an improved therapeutic ratio, its implementation been slow, mostly because of technical challenges. In this review, we describe the potential role of MRI at different steps in the treatment workflow for prostate brachytherapy: for patient selection, treatment planning, in the operating room, or for postimplant assessment. We further present the current clinical experience with MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy, both for permanent seed implantation and high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Immune Modulation by Androgen Deprivation and Radiation Therapy: Implications for Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy

Prostate cancer patients often receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with radiation therapy (RT). Recent evidence suggests that both ADT and RT have immune modulatory properties. First, ADT can cause infiltration of lymphocytes into the prostate, although it remains unclear whether the influx of lymphocytes is beneficial, particularly with the advent of new classes of androgen blockers. Second, in rare cases, radiation can elicit immune responses that mediate regression of metastatic lesions lying outside the field of radiation, a phenomenon known as the abscopal response. In light of these findings, there is emerging interest in exploiting any potential synergy between ADT, RT, and immunotherapy. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the rationale behind combining immunotherapy with ADT and RT for the treatment of prostate cancer, including an examination of the current clinical trials that employ this combination. The reported outcomes of several trials demonstrate the promise of this combination strategy; however, further scrutiny is needed to elucidate how these standard therapies interact with immune modulators. In addition, we discuss the importance of synchronizing immune modulation relative to ADT and RT, and provide insight into elements that may impact the ability to achieve maximum synergy between these treatments.

American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Use of androgen deprivation therapy with prostate brachytherapy-A systematic literature review

PURPOSE

Prostate brachytherapy (PB) has well-documented excellent long-term outcomes in all risk groups. There are significant uncertainties regarding the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with brachytherapy. The purpose of this report was to review systemically the published literature and summarize present knowledge regarding the impact of ADT on biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search was conducted in Medline and Embase covering the years 1996-2016. Selected were articles with >100 patients, minimum followup 3 years, defined risk stratification, and directly examining the role and impact of ADT on bPFS, CSS, and OS. The studies were grouped to reflect disease risk stratification. We also reviewed the impact of ADT on OS, cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, and on-going brachytherapy randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Fifty-two selected studies (43,303 patients) were included in this review; 7 high-dose rate and 45 low-dose rate; 25 studies were multi-institutional and 27 single institution (retrospective review or prospective data collection) and 2 were RCTs. The studies were heterogeneous in patient population, risk categories, risk factors, followup time, and treatment administered, including ADT administration and duration (median, 3-12 months);71% of the studies reported a lack of benefit, whereas 28% showed improvement in bPFS with addition of ADT to PB. The lack of benefit was seen in low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk (IR) disease and most high-dose rate studies. A bPFS benefit of up to 15% was seen with ADT use in patients with suboptimal dosimetry, those with multiple adverse risk factors (unfavorable IR [uIR]), and most high-risk (HR) studies. Four studies reported very small benefit to CSS (2%). None of the studies showed OS advantage; however, three studies reported an absolute 5-20% OS detriment with ADT. Literature suggests that OS detriment is more likely in older patients or those with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Four RCTs with an adequate number of patients and well-defined risk stratification are in progress. One RCT will answer the question regarding the role of ADT with PB in favorable IR patients and the other three RCTs will focus on optimal duration of ADT in the uIR and favorable HR population.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with brachytherapy have excellent long-term disease outcomes. Existing evidence shows no benefit of adding ADT to PB in low-risk and favorable IR patients. UIR and HR patients and those with suboptimal dosimetry may have up to 15% improvement in bPFS with addition of 3-12 months of ADT, with uncertain impact on CSS and a potential detriment on OS. To minimize morbidity, one should exercise caution in prescribing ADT together with PB, in particular to older men and those with existing cardiovascular disease. Due to the retrospective nature of this evidence, significant selection, and treatment bias, no definitive conclusions are possible. RCT is urgently needed to define the potential role and optimal duration of ADT in uIR and favorable HR disease.