1
|
Kalinderi K, Kalinderis M, Papaliagkas V, Fidani L. The Reproductive Lifespan of Ovarian Follicle. Reprod Sci 2024; 31:2604-2614. [PMID: 38816594 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01606-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
The functional unit within mammalian ovaries is the ovarian follicle. The development of the ovarian follicle is a lengthy process beginning from the time of embryogenesis, passing through multiple different stages of maturation. The purpose of this review is to describe the most basic events in the journey of ovarian follicle development, discussing the importance of ovarian reserve and highlighting the role of several factors that affect oocyte quality and quantity during aging including hormonal, genetic and epigenetic factors. Novel, promising anti-aging strategies are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kallirhoe Kalinderi
- Laboratory of Medical Biology-Genetics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Greece.
| | - Michail Kalinderis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's University Hospital NHS Trust, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0QT, UK
| | - Vasileios Papaliagkas
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, 57400, Greece
| | - Liana Fidani
- Laboratory of Medical Biology-Genetics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suzuki R, Tan X, Szymanska KJ, Kubikova N, Perez CA, Wells D, Oktay KH. The role of declining ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) function in oocyte aging. Cell Death Discov 2024; 10:302. [PMID: 38914566 PMCID: PMC11196715 DOI: 10.1038/s41420-024-02041-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the advances in the understanding of reproductive physiology, the mechanisms underlying ovarian aging are still not deciphered. Recent research found an association between impaired ATM-mediated DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair mechanisms and oocyte aging. However, direct evidence connecting ATM-mediated pathway function decline and impaired oocyte quality is lacking. The objective of this study was to determine the role of ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair in the maintenance of oocyte quality in a mouse oocyte knockdown model. Gene interference, in vitro culture, parthenogenesis coupled with genotoxicity assay approaches, as well as molecular cytogenetic analyses based upon next-generation sequencing, were used to test the hypothesis that intact ATM function is critical in the maintenance of oocyte quality. We found that ATM knockdown impaired oocyte quality, resulting in poor embryo development. ATM knockdown significantly lowered or blocked the progression of meiosis in vitro, as well as retarding and reducing embryo cleavage after parthenogenesis. After ATM knockdown, all embryos were of poor quality, and none reached the blastocyst stage. ATM knockdown was also associated with an increased aneuploidy rate compared to controls. Finally, ATM knockdown increased the sensitivity of the oocytes to a genotoxic active metabolite of cyclophosphamide, with increased formation of DNA DSBs, reduced survival, and earlier apoptotic death compared to controls. These findings suggest a key role for ATM in maintaining oocyte quality and resistance to genotoxic stress, and that the previously observed age-induced decline in oocyte ATM function may be a prime factor contributing to oocyte aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reiko Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Xiujuan Tan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Katarzyna J Szymanska
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Nada Kubikova
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Columba Avila Perez
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Dagan Wells
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Juno Genetics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kutluk H Oktay
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Suba Z. DNA Damage Responses in Tumors Are Not Proliferative Stimuli, but Rather They Are DNA Repair Actions Requiring Supportive Medical Care. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1573. [PMID: 38672654 PMCID: PMC11049279 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In tumors, somatic mutagenesis presumably drives the DNA damage response (DDR) via altered regulatory pathways, increasing genomic instability and proliferative activity. These considerations led to the standard therapeutic strategy against cancer: the disruption of mutation-activated DNA repair pathways of tumors. PURPOSE Justifying that cancer cells are not enemies to be killed, but rather that they are ill human cells which have the remnants of physiologic regulatory pathways. RESULTS 1. Genomic instability and cancer development may be originated from a flaw in estrogen signaling rather than excessive estrogen signaling; 2. Healthy cells with genomic instability exhibit somatic mutations, helping DNA restitution; 3. Somatic mutations in tumor cells aim for the restoration of DNA damage, rather than further genomic derangement; 4. In tumors, estrogen signaling drives the pathways of DNA stabilization, leading to apoptotic death; 5. In peritumoral cellular infiltration, the genomic damage of the tumor induces inflammatory cytokine secretion and increased estrogen synthesis. In the inflammatory cells, an increased growth factor receptor (GFR) signaling confers the unliganded activation of estrogen receptors (ERs); 6. In breast cancer cells responsive to genotoxic therapy, constitutive mutations help the upregulation of estrogen signaling and consequential apoptosis. In breast tumors non-responsive to genotoxic therapy, the possibilities for ER activation via either liganded or unliganded pathways are exhausted, leading to farther genomic instability and unrestrained proliferation. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the real character and behavior of human tumors at the molecular level suggests that we should learn the genome repairing methods of tumors and follow them by supportive therapy, rather than provoking additional genomic damages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsuzsanna Suba
- Department of Molecular Pathology, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György Str. 7-9, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jin Z, Tian C, Kang M, Hu S, Zhao L, Zhang W. The 100 top-cited articles in menopausal syndrome: a bibliometric analysis. Reprod Health 2024; 21:47. [PMID: 38589898 PMCID: PMC11003046 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01770-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant scientific research has been conducted concerning menopausal syndrome(MPS), yet few bibliometric analyses have been performed. Our aim was to recognise the 100 most highly cited published articles on MPS and to analytically evaluate their key features. METHODS To identify the 100 most frequently cited articles, a search was conducted on Web of Science using the term 'menopausal syndrome'. Articles that matched the predetermined criteria were scrutinised to obtain the following data: citation ranking, year of publication, publishing journal, journal impact factor, country of origin, academic institution, authors, study type, and keywords. RESULTS The publication period is from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2022. The maximum number of citations was 406 and in 2012. The median citations per year was 39.70. Most of the articles focused on treatment and complications. These articles were published in 36 different journals, with the Journal of MENOPAUSE having published the greatest number (14%). Forty-eight articles (48%) were from the United States, with the University of Pittsburgh being the leading institute (9%). Joann E. Manson was the most frequent first author (n = 6). Observational studies were the most frequently conducted research type (n = 53), followed by experimental studies (n = 33). Keyword analysis identified classic research topics, including genitourinary syndrome of menopause, bone mineral density (BMD), and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) loci. CONCLUSION Using bibliometrics, we conducted an analysis to identify the inadequacies, traditional focal points, and potential prospects in the study of MPS across current scientific areas. Treatment and complications are at the core of MPS research, whereas prediction and biomarkers have less literature of high quality. There is a necessity for innovative analytical metrics to measure the real effect of these papers with a high level of citation on clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zishan Jin
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
- Institute of Metabolic Diseases, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Chuanxi Tian
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Mengjiao Kang
- Institute of Metabolic Diseases, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Shiwan Hu
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
- Institute of Metabolic Diseases, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Linhua Zhao
- Institute of Metabolic Diseases, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
| | - Wei Zhang
- Institute of Metabolic Diseases, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
- Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Von Holle A, Adami HO, Baglietto L, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Bertrand KA, Blot W, Chen Y, DeHart JC, Dossus L, Eliassen AH, Fournier A, Garcia-Closas M, Giles G, Guevara M, Hankinson SE, Heath A, Jones ME, Joshu CE, Kaaks R, Kirsh VA, Kitahara CM, Koh WP, Linet MS, Park HL, Masala G, Mellemkjaer L, Milne RL, O'Brien KM, Palmer JR, Riboli E, Rohan TE, Shrubsole MJ, Sund M, Tamimi R, Tin Tin S, Visvanathan K, Vermeulen RC, Weiderpass E, Willett WC, Yuan JM, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Nichols HB, Sandler DP, Swerdlow AJ, Schoemaker MJ, Weinberg CR. BMI and breast cancer risk around age at menopause. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 89:102545. [PMID: 38377945 PMCID: PMC10942753 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) is associated with decreased risk of breast cancer before menopause, but increased risk after menopause. Exactly when this reversal occurs in relation to menopause is unclear. Locating that change point could provide insight into the role of adiposity in breast cancer etiology. METHODS We examined the association between BMI and breast cancer risk in the Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group, from age 45 up to breast cancer diagnosis, loss to follow-up, death, or age 55, whichever came first. Analyses included 609,880 women in 16 prospective studies, including 9956 who developed breast cancer before age 55. We fitted three BMI hazard ratio (HR) models over age-time: constant, linear, or nonlinear (via splines), applying piecewise exponential additive mixed models, with age as the primary time scale. We divided person-time into four strata: premenopause; postmenopause due to natural menopause; postmenopause because of interventional loss of ovarian function (bilateral oophorectomy (BO) or chemotherapy); postmenopause due to hysterectomy without BO. Sensitivity analyses included stratifying by BMI in young adulthood, or excluding women using menopausal hormone therapy. RESULTS The constant BMI HR model provided the best fit for all four menopausal status groups. Under this model, the estimated association between a five-unit increment in BMI and breast cancer risk was HR=0.87 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.89) before menopause, HR=1.00 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.04) after natural menopause, HR=0.99 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.05) after interventional loss of ovarian function, and HR=0.88 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.02) after hysterectomy without BO. CONCLUSION The BMI breast cancer HRs remained less than or near one during the 45-55 year age range indicating that the transition to a positive association between BMI and risk occurs after age 55.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Von Holle
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Clinical Effectiveness Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinksa Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Laura Baglietto
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - William Blot
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yu Chen
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Clague DeHart
- School of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA
| | - Laure Dossus
- Nutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - A Heather Eliassen
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Agnes Fournier
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France
| | - Montse Garcia-Closas
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Graham Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marcela Guevara
- Instituto de Salud Pública y Laboral de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Susan E Hankinson
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Alicia Heath
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Corinne E Joshu
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Cari M Kitahara
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore
| | - Martha S Linet
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hannah Lui Park
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Giovanna Masala
- Institute for the Study and Prevention of Cancer, Florence, Italy
| | - Lene Mellemkjaer
- Diet, Cancer and Health, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katie M O'Brien
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Julie R Palmer
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Malin Sund
- Department of Surgical and perioperative Sciences/Surgery, Umea University, Sweden
| | - Rulla Tamimi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, USA
| | - Sandar Tin Tin
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Roel Ch Vermeulen
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Walter C Willett
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jian-Min Yuan
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Clarice R Weinberg
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tanaka H, Motooka Y, Maeda Y, Sonehara R, Nakamura T, Kajiyama H, Mashimo T, Toyokuni S. Brca2(p.T1942fs/+) dissipates ovarian reserve in rats through oxidative stress in follicular granulosa cells. Free Radic Res 2024; 58:130-143. [PMID: 38394084 DOI: 10.1080/10715762.2024.2320405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2 constitute hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome, and BRCA1/2 mutant is a risk for various cancers. Whereas the clinical guideline for HBOC patients has been organized for the therapy and prevention of cancer, there is no recommendation on the female reproductive discipline. Indeed, the role of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in ovarian reserve has not been established due to the deficiency of appropriate animal models. Here, we used a rat model of Brca2(p.T1942fs/+) mutant of Sprague-Dawley strain with CRISPR-Cas9 editing to evaluate ovarian reserve in females. Fertility and ovarian follicles were evaluated and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was measured at 8-32 weeks of age with a comparison between the wild-type and the mutant rats (MUT). MUT revealed a significantly smaller number of deliveries with fewer total pups. Furthermore, MUT showed a significant decrease in primordial follicles at 20 weeks and a low AMH level at 28 weeks. RNA-sequencing of the ovary at 10 weeks detected acceleration of the DNA damage repair pathway, which was accompanied by oxidative stress-induced DNA double-strand breaks, a decrease in PTEN, and an increase in mTOR in follicular granulosa cells. In conclusion, Brca2(p.T1942fs/+) dissipates primordial follicles via early activation of granulosa cells through oxidative stress, leading to earlier termination of fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Tanaka
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yashiro Motooka
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuki Maeda
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Reina Sonehara
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoko Nakamura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kajiyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoji Mashimo
- Division of Animal Genetics, Laboratory Animal Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Genome Engineering, Center for Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Toyokuni
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
- Center for Low-temperature Plasma Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
- Center for Integrated Sciences of Low-temperature Plasma Core Research (iPlasma Core), Tokai National Higher Education and Research System, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li PC, Zhu YF, Cao WM, Li B. ER-positive and BRCA2-mutated breast cancer: a literature review. Eur J Med Res 2024; 29:30. [PMID: 38184581 PMCID: PMC10770892 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01618-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BRCA2-mutated carriers have a high lifetime risk of breast cancer (BC), an early age of onset, and an increased risk of other cancers (including ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer). Almost 70-80% of BRCA2-mutated BC are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, which is a particular type of ER-positive BC that differs from sporadic ER-positive BC. This article reviews the clinicopathological features, treatment, and prognosis of ER-positive and BRCA2-mutated BC to provide a reference for clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pu-Chun Li
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, 310022, China
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Yi-Fan Zhu
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, 310022, China
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Wen-Ming Cao
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
| | - Bei Li
- Department of Geriatric, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barrett F, Shaw J, Besser AG, Grifo JA, Blakemore JK. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders: clinical experience with BRCA1 and BRCA2 from 2010-2021. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:2705-2713. [PMID: 37691027 PMCID: PMC10643755 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02925-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim was to describe the reproductive decisions and outcomes of BRCA-positive patients who used preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M). METHODS We performed a retrospective case series of all PGT-M cycles for BRCA variants between 2010-2021 at a large urban academic fertility center. All patients who underwent ≥ 1 cycle of IVF with PGT-M for BRCA1 or BRCA2 were included. The primary outcome was total number of BRCA-negative euploid embryos per patient. RESULTS Sixty four patients underwent PGT-M for BRCA variants. Forty-five percent (29/64) were BRCA1-positive females, 27% (17/64) were BRCA2-positive females, 16% (10/64) were BRCA1-positive males, 11% (7/64) were BRCA2-positive males, and one was a BRCA1 and BRCA2-positive male. There were 125 retrieval cycles with PGT-M, and all cycles included PGT for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Eighty-six percent (55/64) of patients obtained at least one BRCA- negative euploid embryo, with median of 1 (range 0-10) BRCA-negative euploid embryo resulted per cycle and median 3 (range 0-10) BRCA-negative euploid embryos accumulated per patient after a median of 2 (range 1-7) oocyte retrievals. Sixty-four percent (41/64) of patients attempted at least one frozen embryo transfer (FET) with a total of 68 FET cycles. Fifty-nine percent (40/68) of embryos transferred resulted in live births. Subgroup analysis revealed different reproductive pathways for BRCA1-positive females, BRCA2-positive females, and BRCA1/2-positive males (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION PGT-M is a viable option for BRCA-positive patients to avoid transmission while building their families. Most patients in our cohort achieved pregnancy with BRCA-negative euploid embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Barrett
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| | - Jacquelyn Shaw
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Andria G Besser
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - James A Grifo
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Jennifer K Blakemore
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gebhart P, Singer CF, Gschwantler-Kaulich D. CA125 Levels in BRCA mutation carriers - a retrospective single center cohort study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:610. [PMID: 37393265 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11116-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers utilizes assessment of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), despite low sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated the association between CA125 levels, BRCA1/2 mutation status and menopausal status to provide more information on clinical conditions that may influence CA125 levels. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed repeated measurements of CA125 levels and clinical data of 466 women at high risk for ovarian cancer. CA125 levels were compared between women with and without deleterious mutations in BRCA1/2. Pearson's correlation was used to determine the association between age and CA125 serum level. Differences in CA125 levels were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. The effect of BRCA1/2 mutation status and menopausal status on the change in CA125 levels was determined by Two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS The CA125 serum levels of premenopausal women (median, 13.8 kU/mL; range, 9.4 - 19.5 kU/mL) were significantly higher than in postmenopausal women (median, 10.4 kU/mL; range, 7.7 - 14.0 kU/mL; p < .001). There was no significant difference in the CA125 levels of BRCA mutation carriers and non-mutation carriers across all age groups (p = .612). When investigating the combined effect of BRCA1/2 mutation and menopausal status, variance analysis revealed a significant interaction between BRCA1/2 mutation status and menopausal status on CA125 levels (p < .001). There was a significant difference between the CA125 levels of premenopausal and postmenopausal women, with a large effect in BRCA mutation carriers (p < .001, d = 1.05), whereas in non-mutation carriers there was only a small effect (p < .001, d = 0.32). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that hereditary mutations in BRCA1/2 affect the decline of CA125 levels with increasing age. To prove a definite effect of this mutation on the CA125 level, prospective trials need to be conducted to define new cut-off levels of CA 125 in mutation carriers and optimize ovarian cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gebhart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - C F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - D Gschwantler-Kaulich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lewinsohn R, Zheng Y, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Peppercorn J, Borges VF, Come S, Snow C, Ginsburg ES, Partridge AH. Fertility Preferences and Practices Among Young Women With Breast Cancer: Germline Genetic Carriers Versus Noncarriers. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:317-323. [PMID: 36628811 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young women with breast cancer who carry germline genetic pathogenic variants may face distinct fertility concerns, yet limited data exist comparing fertility preferences and practices between carriers and noncarriers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (NCT01468246), a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤40 years, who completed a modified Fertility Issues Survey were included in this analysis. RESULTS Of 1052 eligible participants, 118 (11%) tested positive for a pathogenic variant. Similar proportions (P = .23) of carriers (46%, [54/118]) and noncarriers (37%, [346/934]) desired more biologic children prediagnosis, and desire decreased similarly postdiagnosis (carriers, 30% [35/118] vs. noncarriers, 26% [244/934], P = .35). Among those desiring children postdiagnosis (n = 279), concern about cancer risk heritability was more common among carriers (74% [26/35] vs. noncarriers, 36% [88/244], P < .01). Carriers were more likely to report that concern about cancer risk heritability contributed to a lack of certainty or interest in future pregnancies (20% [16/81] vs. noncarriers, 7% [49/674], P = .001). Similar proportions (P = .65) of carriers (36% [43/118]) and noncarriers (38% [351/934]) were somewhat or very concerned about infertility post-treatment; utilization of fertility preservation strategies was also similar (carriers, 14% [17/118] vs. noncarriers, 12% [113/934], P = .78). CONCLUSION Carriers were similarly concerned about future fertility and as likely to pursue fertility preservation as noncarriers. Concern about cancer risk heritability was more frequent among carriers and impacted decisions not to pursue future pregnancies for some, underscoring the importance of counseling regarding strategies to prevent transmission to offspring, including preimplantation genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Lewinsohn
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Yue Zheng
- Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Steven Come
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Craig Snow
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ann H Partridge
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhu Z, Xu W, Liu L. Ovarian aging: mechanisms and intervention strategies. MEDICAL REVIEW (BERLIN, GERMANY) 2022; 2:590-610. [PMID: 37724254 PMCID: PMC10471094 DOI: 10.1515/mr-2022-0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian reserve is essential for fertility and influences healthy aging in women. Advanced maternal age correlates with the progressive loss of both the quantity and quality of oocytes. The molecular mechanisms and various contributing factors underlying ovarian aging have been uncovered. In this review, we highlight some of critical factors that impact oocyte quantity and quality during aging. Germ cell and follicle reserve at birth determines reproductive lifespan and timing the menopause in female mammals. Accelerated diminishing ovarian reserve leads to premature ovarian aging or insufficiency. Poor oocyte quality with increasing age could result from chromosomal cohesion deterioration and misaligned chromosomes, telomere shortening, DNA damage and associated genetic mutations, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and epigenetic alteration. We also discuss the intervention strategies to delay ovarian aging. Both the efficacy of senotherapies by antioxidants against reproductive aging and mitochondrial therapy are discussed. Functional oocytes and ovarioids could be rejuvenated from pluripotent stem cells or somatic cells. We propose directions for future interventions. As couples increasingly begin delaying parenthood in life worldwide, understanding the molecular mechanisms during female reproductive aging and potential intervention strategies could benefit women in making earlier choices about their reproductive health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengmao Zhu
- Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Wanxue Xu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Liu
- Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Union Medical Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Should Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) Systematically Be Proposed to BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235769. [PMID: 36497251 PMCID: PMC9739906 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past years, BRCA genes pathogenic variants have been associated to reproductive issues. Indeed, evidence indicate that BRCA-mutated patients are not only at higher risk of developing malignancies, but may also present a reduction of the follicular stockpile. Given these characteristics, BRCA patients may be candidates to fertility preservation (FP) techniques or preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to avoid the transmission of this inherited situation. Since the success rates of both procedures are highly related to the number of oocytes that could be recovered after ovarian stimulation, predicted by ovarian reserve tests, they are ideally performed before the diagnosis of cancer and its treatment. Despite the specific reproductive challenges related to BRCA status, no international guidelines for the application of PGT and FP in this subgroup of patients is currently available. The present article aims to review the available data regarding BRCA carriers' ovarian reserve and PGT success rates in oncologic and non-oncologic contexts, to determine the actual indication of PGT and further to improve patients' care pathway.
Collapse
|
13
|
C.E DK, C. VTT, J.C. EM, G.W.M. LE, Irene H, Mariette G, J.T. VGR, Willem V, D. LK, J.M. BF, M.E. BA. The Impact of BRCA1- and BRCA2 Mutations on Ovarian Reserve Status. Reprod Sci 2022; 30:270-282. [PMID: 35705781 PMCID: PMC9810575 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00997-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether female BRCA1- and BRCA2 mutation carriers have a reduced ovarian reserve status, based on serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels, antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian response to ovarian hyperstimulation. A prospective, multinational cohort study was performed between October 2014 and December 2019. Normo-ovulatory women, aged 18-41 years old, applying for their first PGT-cycle for reason of a BRCA mutation (cases) or other genetic diseases unrelated to ovarian reserve (controls), were asked to participate. All participants underwent a ICSI-PGT cycle with a long-agonist protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Linear and logistic regression models were used to compare AMH, AFC and ovarian response in cases and controls. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on BRCA1- and BRCA2 mutation carrier subgroups. Thirty-six BRCA mutation carriers (18 BRCA1- and 18 BRCA2 mutation carriers) and 126 controls, with mean female age 30.4 years, were included in the primary analysis. Unadjusted median AMH serum levels (IQR) were 2.40 (1.80-3.00) ng/ml in BRCA mutation carriers and 2.15 (1.30-3.40) ng/ml in controls (p = 0.45), median AFC (IQR) was 15.0 (10.8-20.3) and 14.5 (9.0-20.0), p = 0.54, respectively. Low response rate was 22.6% among BRCA mutation carriers and 9.3% among controls, p = 0.06. Median number of retrieved oocytes was 9 (6-14) in carriers and 10 (7-13) in controls, p = 0.36. No substantial differences were observed between BRCA1- and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Based on several biomarkers, no meaningful differences in ovarian reserve status were observed in female BRCA mutation carriers compared to controls in the context of ICSI-PGT treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drechsel Katja C.E
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - van Tilborg Theodora C.
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eijkemans Marinus J.C.
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lentjes Eef G.W.M.
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory (CDL), University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Homminga Irene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Section Reproductive Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Goddijn Mariette
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, AZ 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - van Golde Ron J.T.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands ,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Verpoest Willem
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lichtenbelt Klaske D.
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Broekmans Frank J.M.
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bos Anna M.E.
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim SW, Kim TH, Han JY, Kim SK, Lee JR, Jee UC, Suh CS, Kim SH. Impact of BRCA mutations and hormone receptor status on reproductive potential in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation. Gynecol Endocrinol 2022; 38:227-230. [PMID: 34775902 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2021.2002294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify whether the BRCA mutations and hormone receptor status affect the ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation. METHODS A total of 117 women diagnosed with breast cancer who were referred to the fertility preservation clinics at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University Hospital between September 2012 and July 2019 undergone ovarian stimulation for oocyte retrieval. Basal characteristics including age, BMI, basal AMH, basal FSH, and fertility preservation outcomes such as the number of retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes were compared retrospectively. RESULTS BRCA1 mutation was noted in 25 women, and BRCA2 mutation was observed in 35 women. Positive estrogen receptor status was noted in 87 women, and positive progesterone receptor status was noted in 69 women. HER2 was positive in 55 women, and 19 women were diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancers. The number of total oocytes retrieved was lower in patients with BRCA mutation (8.3 ± 5.4 vs. 15.3 ± 8.7, p = .002). The number of mature oocytes retrieved was also lower in BRCA carriers (4.7 ± 4.2 vs. 8.7 ± 7.9, p = .025). Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients were younger than non-TNBC patients (30.3 ± 4.8 vs. 33.9 ± 5.0, p = .007). The rate of mature oocyte rate was higher in TNBC patients (68.6%±20.6 vs. 52.5%±29.7, p = .037). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated that BRCA carriers with breast cancer had comparable ovarian reserve to non-carriers but the response to ovarian stimulation was lower. We also observed that oocyte maturity was higher in TNBC patients, however age might be a confounding factor of this result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Woo Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine,, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hee Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine,, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Han
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine,, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seul Ki Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine,, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine,, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Ung Chul Jee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine,, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Suk Suh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine,, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok Hyun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine,, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maksimenko J, Irmejs A, Gardovskis J. Pregnancy after breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:3. [PMID: 35062994 PMCID: PMC8781048 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00209-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Often young women affected with BRCA1/2 positive breast cancer have not finished or even not started their childbearing before the onset of the disease. The aim of our mini-review is to summarize state of art knowledge on pregnancy after breast cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers. Methods A broad review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) for relevant articles published. Main body of the abstract This review summarizes the impact of different cytotoxic agents on a fertility, fertility preservation, maternal and fetal prognosis after pregnancy in breast cancer survivors with BRCA1/2. Conclusion According to the existing literature evidence pregnancy after therapy for breast cancer in BRCA carriers is safe for the mother and offspring, but patients’ needs, oncofertility counseling and fertility-sparing strategy should be carefully planned before starting the cytotoxic treatment.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim S, Lee S, Park HT, Song JY, Kim T. Genomic Consideration in Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Damage and Fertility Preservation. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:1525. [PMID: 34680919 PMCID: PMC8535252 DOI: 10.3390/genes12101525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage and fertility preservation in young patients with cancer are emerging disciplines. The mechanism of treatment-related gonadal damage provides important information for targeting prevention methods. The genomic aspects of ovarian damage after chemotherapy are not fully understood. Several studies have demonstrated that gene alterations related to follicular apoptosis or accelerated follicle activation are related to ovarian insufficiency and susceptibility to ovarian damage following chemotherapy. This may accelerate follicular apoptosis and follicle reservoir utilization and damage the ovarian stroma via multiple molecular reactions after chemotherapy. This review highlights the importance of genomic considerations in chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage and multidisciplinary oncofertility strategies for providing high-quality care to young female cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongmin Kim
- Gynecologic Cancer Center, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University College of Medicine, 1205 Jungang-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si 10414, Korea;
| | - Sanghoon Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea; (H.-T.P.); (J.-Y.S.); (T.K.)
| | - Hyun-Tae Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea; (H.-T.P.); (J.-Y.S.); (T.K.)
| | - Jae-Yun Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea; (H.-T.P.); (J.-Y.S.); (T.K.)
| | - Tak Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea; (H.-T.P.); (J.-Y.S.); (T.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Buonomo B, Massarotti C, Dellino M, Anserini P, Ferrari A, Campanella M, Magnotti M, De Stefano C, Peccatori FA, Lambertini M. Reproductive issues in carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes: an expert meeting. BMC Med 2021; 19:205. [PMID: 34503502 PMCID: PMC8431919 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02081-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthy individuals and patients with cancer who are carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes face multiple reproductive challenges that require appropriate counseling and specific expertise. MAIN BODY On December 5th-7th, 2019, patient advocates and physicians with expertise in the field of reproductive medicine, fertility preservation, and oncology were invited to "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital in Avellino (Italy) for a workshop on reproductive management of women with germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes. From the discussion regarding the current evidence and future prospective in the field, eight main research questions were formulated and eight recommendations were developed regarding fertility, fertility preservation, preimplantation genetic testing, and pregnancy in healthy carriers and patients with cancer. CONCLUSION Several misconceptions about the topic persist among health care providers and patients often resulting in a discontinuous and suboptimal management. With the aim to offer patient-tailored counseling about reproductive issues, both awareness of current evidences and research should be promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Buonomo
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Paola Anserini
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Alberta Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Campanella
- aBRCAdabra, National Patient Advocacy Association for carriers of BRCA genes mutation, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mirosa Magnotti
- ACTO Campania, Alleanza Contro il Tumore Ovarico, Avellino, Italy
| | - Cristofaro De Stefano
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy. .,Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Controversies in Hereditary Cancer Management. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137:941-955. [PMID: 33831930 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Personalized management of patients at risk ideally should involve a multidisciplinary team of not only genetic counselors and surgeons, but also women's health or menopause specialists, knowledgeable psychologists, and primary care providers or obstetrician-gynecologists aware of the risks and fears "previvors" (survivors of a predisposition to cancer who have not had the disease) face as well as the issues that are common postoperatively. Identification of patients at risk for hereditary cancer, understanding of current genetic testing modalities and potential results, knowledge about screening and prevention including timing of surveillance, preventive medication and risk-reducing surgeries, understanding limitations and comorbidities associated with these risk management strategies and long-term psychological support are all important in hereditary cancer management. We describe issues surrounding the identification of the high-risk patient, universal testing in breast and ovarian cancer, and testing in special populations. We describe a simplified approach to understanding and communicating genetic testing results and nuances of testing including direct-to-consumer testing. We highlight concerns surrounding breast cancer screening during pregnancy and lactation. A framework for practical management and counseling of women who opt for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or risk-reducing mastectomy or both is provided. We provide an in-depth discussion of questions that arise in relation to timing of surgery, fertility preservation, management of menopausal symptoms, and surgical technique. Alternative choices in women who choose to delay bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are reviewed. Finally, the psychosocial effects of carrying a genetic mutation and the issues that women face when undergoing to risk-reducing surgery including adjustment, sexuality issues, and cosmesis are addressed.
Collapse
|
19
|
Denis-Laroque L, Drouet Y, Plotton I, Chopin N, Bonadona V, Lornage J, Salle B, Lasset C, Rousset-Jablonski C. Anti-müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant: A retrospective cohort study. Breast 2021; 59:239-247. [PMID: 34304065 PMCID: PMC8326804 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Some studies suggested a decreased ovarian reserve among BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, with conflicting results. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study of ovarian reserve and spontaneous fertility comparing BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers to controls (women who attended consultations to discuss fertility preservation before gonadotoxic treatment). Measures of associations between plasma AMH concentration, AFC and BRCA1/2 status were modelled by nonlinear generalized additive regression models and logistic regressions adjusted for age at plasma storage, oral contraceptive use, body mass index, cigarette smoking, and the AMH assay technique. Results The whole population comprised 119 BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and 92 controls. A total of 110 women (42 carriers, among whom 30 were cancer-free, and 68 controls) underwent an ovarian reserve evaluation. Spontaneous fertility analysis included all women who previously attempted to become pregnant (134 women). We observed a tendency towards a premature decrease in ovarian reserve in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, but no difference in mean AMH or AFC levels was found between BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and controls. An analysis of the extreme levels of AMH (≤5 pmol/l) and AFC (≤7 follicles) by logistic regression suggested a higher risk of low ovarian reserve among BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.00–12.8, p = 0.05; and adjusted OR = 4.99, 95% CI = 1.10–22.62, p = 0.04, respectively). Discussion Attention should be paid to BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers’ ovarian reserve, considering this potential risk of premature alteration. A tendency towards a premature decrease in the ovarian reserve in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers was found. BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers presented a higher risk of a low ovarian reserve. Information and education regarding reproduction is mandatory among BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie Denis-Laroque
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Surgical Oncology, 28 rue Laënnec, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Youenn Drouet
- Centre Léon Bérard, Département Prévention et Santé Publique, 28, Rue Laënnec, Lyon, 69008, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie évolutive, 16, rue Raphael Dubois, Villeurbanne Cedex, 69622, France
| | - Ingrid Plotton
- Hormonology and Molecular Endocrinology, Biology and Est Pathology Center, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, U1208, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Bron, France
| | - Nicolas Chopin
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Surgical Oncology, 28 rue Laënnec, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Valérie Bonadona
- Centre Léon Bérard, Département Prévention et Santé Publique, 28, Rue Laënnec, Lyon, 69008, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie évolutive, 16, rue Raphael Dubois, Villeurbanne Cedex, 69622, France
| | - Jacqueline Lornage
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Service de Médecine de La Reproduction, Bron, France
| | - Bruno Salle
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Service de Médecine de La Reproduction, Bron, France
| | - Christine Lasset
- Centre Léon Bérard, Département Prévention et Santé Publique, 28, Rue Laënnec, Lyon, 69008, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie évolutive, 16, rue Raphael Dubois, Villeurbanne Cedex, 69622, France
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Surgical Oncology, 28 rue Laënnec, 69008, Lyon, France; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165 Chemin Du Grand Revoyet, 69310, Pierre-Bénite, France; Research on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Turan V, Lambertini M, Lee DY, Wang E, Clatot F, Karlan BY, Demeestere I, Bang H, Oktay K. Association of Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants With Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient-Level Data. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2016-2024. [PMID: 33891474 PMCID: PMC8260903 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether germline BRCA (gBRCA) pathogenic variants are associated with decreased ovarian reserve. MATERIALS AND METHODS An individual patient-level data meta-analysis was performed using five data sets on 828 evaluable women who were tested for gBRCA. Of those, 250 carried gBRCA, whereas 578 had tested negative and served as controls. Of the women with gBRCA, four centers studied those affected with breast cancer (n = 161) and one studied unaffected individuals (n = 89). The data were adjusted for the center, age, body mass index, smoking, and oral contraceptive pill use before the final analysis. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in affected women were drawn before presystemic therapy. RESULTS The mean age of women with versus without gBRCA1/2 (34.1 ± 4.9 v 34.3 ± 4.8 years; P = .48) and with gBRCA1 versus gBRCA2 (33.7 ± 4.9 v 34.6 ± 4.8 years; P = .16) was similar. After the adjustments, women with gBRCA1/2 had significantly lower AMH levels compared with controls (23% lower; 95% CI, 4 to 38; P = .02). When the adjusted analysis was limited to affected women (157 with gBRCA v 524 without, after exclusions), the difference persisted (25% lower; 95% CI, 9 to 38; P = .003). The serum AMH levels were lower in women with gBRCA1 (33% lower; 95% CI, 12 to 49; P = .004) but not gBRCA2 compared with controls (7% lower; 95% CI, 31% lower to 26% higher; P = .64). CONCLUSION Young women with gBRCA pathogenic variants, particularly those affected and with gBRCA1, have lower serum AMH levels compared with controls. They may need to be preferentially counseled about the possibility of shortened reproductive lifespan because of diminished ovarian reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkan Turan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health and Technology University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Dong-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Erica Wang
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Fertility Clinic, Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, CUB-Erasme, and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Heejung Bang
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA
| | - Kutluk Oktay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nikolettos K, Damaskos C, Garmpis N, Nikolettos N. BRCA 1, 2 mutation and earlier menopause. Could BRCA 1, 2 be used as predictor of menopause? Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 74:165-170. [PMID: 34137566 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04813-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Many studies have shown that BRCA mutation is not only related to cancer but also to ovarian aging. Studies in both human and mice oocytes have shown that Double-strand breaks (DSBs) accumulate with age. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have found 44 genetic loci that are related to variations when a female is about to have menopause. BRCA1 is involved in these 44 loci that are associated with the age of menopause. This review has gathered all results of literature search about the association between BRCA genes and early menopause. The majority of the articles found that women with BRCA mutation have earlier menopause compared to non-carriers. In conclusion, in the near future BRCA1,2 genes could be used as predictive biomarkers of menopause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christos Damaskos
- Renal Transplantation Unit, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.,N.S. Christeas Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Garmpis
- N.S. Christeas Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikos Nikolettos
- Obstetric and Gynecologic Clinic, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fertility Preservation and Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-021-00420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
23
|
Age of natural menopause onset in BRCA1/2 carriers - systematic review and meta-analysis. MENOPAUSE REVIEW 2021; 19:171-173. [PMID: 33488327 PMCID: PMC7812531 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2020.101946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Germinal pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with high risk of cancers, including breast, ovary, fallopian tubes and primary peritoneal. Non-oncological implications of germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, complicating reproductive health are less described. The influence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 on age of natural menopause remains inconclusive and controversial. Material and methods PubMed database was searched for potentially relevant abstracts. Studies which were not case-control, cohort or cross-sectional studies were subsequently excluded. Reference lists from systematic reviews or meta-analyses, dealing with the topic of menopause and BRCA1 and BRCA2 germinal pathogenic variants, were also checked to identify eligible studies. We also included our original, unpublished data from families, affected by BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant, consisted of at least two postmenopausal female siblings with differing variant status. Results and conclusions Initial database search retrieved 193 abstracts. We identified 4 eligible studies for meta-analysis. Two studies not reporting dispersion measures and not reporting age of natural menopause in control group were left in summary for illustrational purposes, yet were excluded from meta-analysis. 4 studies and our original, unpublished data, combining data from 1535 germinal BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers and 3191 control individuals, did not support the hypothesis of association between germinal pathogenic variants of “breast cancer genes” and premature menopause.
Collapse
|
24
|
La Marca A, Mastellari E. Fertility preservation for genetic diseases leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:759-777. [PMID: 33495935 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02067-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The current review aims to summarize the data available concerning the applicability of fertility preservation techniques to genetic conditions at risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). METHODS A literature review through the PubMed Database was carried out. RESULTS About 10% of cases of POI is related to genetic diseases. The most frequent conditions associated with POI are Turner syndrome and fragile X pre-mutation; mutation of BRCA 1-2 genes and several other mutations and genetic syndromes have recently been highlighted, although they rarely occur. If a diagnosis is issued before POI onset, counseling on currently available fertility preservation techniques is advisable. In case of spontaneous menarche (this can occur variably depending on the mutation) established techniques like embryo or oocyte cryopreservation can be proposed, even if, in some cases, their effectiveness may be reduced by ovarian alterations connected to the mutation. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has recently been defined as an established medical procedure for fertility preservation in young cancer patients and may be an option for prepubertal patients. However, it is still experimental in special populations with genetic diseases causing POI. New innovative experimental techniques, like in vitro maturation of immature oocytes (IVM) and vitro activation (IVA) of immature follicles on ovarian tissue, have shown limited but encouraging data and they will be probably available in the near future. For a correct risk-benefit evaluation, the following aspects should be considered: actual knowledge about the pathology-specific efficacy of the various techniques, the average age of onset of POI, the possible risks associated with the procedure in relation to the underlying pathology, the probability of spontaneous conception, as well as the health implications of a possible future pregnancy.. CONCLUSIONS Fertility preservation techniques represent a crucial opportunity for patients with genetic risk of POI. Early diagnosis increases the chances to apply these techniques. No specific recommendations concerning fertility preservation for each genetic pathology are available, and clinicians should first counsel the patient and her relatives about known risks and benefits of the available techniques, both those established and those considered as experimental.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio La Marca
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. .,Clinica Eugin Modena, Modena, Italy.
| | - Elisa Mastellari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shulman Y, Almog B, Kalma Y, Fouks Y, Azem F, Cohen Y. Effects of letrozole or tamoxifen coadministered with a standard stimulation protocol on fertility preservation among breast cancer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:743-750. [PMID: 33409757 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02030-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effects of letrozole or tamoxifen coadministration on fertility preservation treatment outcomes. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 118 breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation treatment between 2008 and 2018. Patients who received letrozole (n = 36) or tamoxifen (n = 30) were compared to controls (n = 52) who underwent standard ovarian stimulation protocols. The primary outcome measures included the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes (MII), fertilization, and top-quality embryo rates. The secondary outcome measures included duration of stimulation, gonadotropin dose and peak estradiol level. RESULTS The number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, fertilization rate, duration of stimulation, or gonadotropin dose were similar in the letrozole and tamoxifen groups, compared to controls. Top-quality embryo rate was lower in the tamoxifen group compared to controls (25% vs 39.4%, respectively, P = 0.034). The abnormal fertilization rate was higher in the letrozole group compared to controls (7.8% vs 3.60%, respectively, P = 0.015). A stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that letrozole and peak estradiol were significantly associated with abnormal fertilization (OR 11.94; 95% CI 2.35-60.4, P = 0.003 for letrozole and OR 1.075; 95% CI 1.024-1.12, P = 0.004 per 100 unit change in estradiol). CONCLUSIONS There may be a negative effect of letrozole or tamoxifen on fertilization and embryo quality, in fertility preservation cycles. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Shulman
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Benny Almog
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yael Kalma
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yuval Fouks
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Foad Azem
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yoni Cohen
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Anderson RA, Su HI. The Clinical Value and Interpretation of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Women With Cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:574263. [PMID: 33117288 PMCID: PMC7577190 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.574263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer treatments can be damaging to the ovary, with implications for future fertility and reproductive lifespan. There is therefore a need for a biomarker than can usefully provide an assessment of the ovary and its potential for long-term function after cancer treatment, and ideally also be of value pre-treatment, for the prediction of post-treatment function. In this review we assess the value of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in this context. Measurement of AMH at the time of cancer diagnosis has been shown to be predictive of whether or not there will remain some ovarian function post-treatment in women with breast cancer, in conjunction with age. AMH may however be reduced at the time of diagnosis in some conditions, including lymphoma, but probably not in women with breast cancer unless they are carriers of BRCA1 mutations. Following chemotherapy, AMH is often much reduced compared to pretreatment levels, with recovery dependent on the chemotherapy regimen administered, the woman's age, and her pretreatment AMH. Recent data show there may be a long duration of relative stability of AMH levels over 10 to 15 years prior to decline rather than a rapid decline for many young women after cancer. Post-treatment AMH may have utility in determining that ovarian function will not recover, contributing to assessment of the need for ovarian suppression in women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. AMH measurement provides an index of treatment gonadotoxicity, allowing comparison of different treatment regimens, although extrapolation to effects on fertility requires caution, and there are very limited data regarding the use of AMH to estimate time to menopause in the post-cancer setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A. Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - H. Irene Su
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Turan V, Oktay K. BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA double-strand break repair and ovarian aging. Hum Reprod Update 2020; 26:43-57. [PMID: 31822904 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 10/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oocyte aging has significant clinical consequences, and yet no treatment exists to address the age-related decline in oocyte quality. The lack of progress in the treatment of oocyte aging is due to the fact that the underlying molecular mechanisms are not sufficiently understood. BRCA1 and 2 are involved in homologous DNA recombination and play essential roles in ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-mediated DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. A growing body of laboratory, translational and clinical evidence has emerged within the past decade indicating a role for BRCA function and ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair in ovarian aging. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE Although there are several competing or complementary theories, given the growing evidence tying BRCA function and ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair mechanisms in general to ovarian aging, we performed this review encompassing basic, translational and clinical work to assess the current state of knowledge on the topic. A clear understanding of the mechanisms underlying oocyte aging may result in targeted treatments to preserve ovarian reserve and improve oocyte quality. SEARCH METHODS We searched for published articles in the PubMed database containing key words, BRCA, BRCA1, BRCA2, Mutations, Fertility, Ovarian Reserve, Infertility, Mechanisms of Ovarian Aging, Oocyte or Oocyte DNA Repair, in the English-language literature until May 2019. We did not include abstracts or conference proceedings, with the exception of our own. OUTCOMES Laboratory studies provided robust and reproducible evidence that BRCA1 function and ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair, in general, weakens with age in oocytes of multiple species including human. In both women with BRCA mutations and BRCA-mutant mice, primordial follicle numbers are reduced and there is accelerated accumulation of DNA DSBs in oocytes. In general, women with BRCA1 mutations have lower ovarian reserves and experience earlier menopause. Laboratory evidence also supports critical role for BRCA1 and other ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair pathway members in meiotic function. When laboratory, translational and clinical evidence is considered together, BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair function emerges as a likely regulator of ovarian aging. Moreover, DNA damage and repair appear to be key features in chemotherapy-induced ovarian aging. WIDER IMPLICATIONS The existing data suggest that the BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA repair pathway is a strong candidate to be a regulator of oocyte aging, and the age-related decline of this pathway likely impairs oocyte health. This knowledge may create an opportunity to develop targeted treatments to reverse or prevent physiological or chemotherapy-induced oocyte aging. On the immediate practical side, women with BRCA or similar mutations may need to be specially counselled for fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkan Turan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uskudar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kutluk Oktay
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Merlino L, Chiné A, Galli C, Piccioni MG. BRCA1/2 genes mutations, ovarian reserve and female reproductive outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 72:339-348. [PMID: 32744451 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.20.04624-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations seems to impact female fertility, in addition to increasing the risk of ovarian and breast cancer. Several studies had investigated this issue but data available are still controversial. In order to clarify the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in female fertility and ovarian function we carried out a systematic review of the literature with the aim to establish a possible management's strategy of these patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A review of current literature regarding BRCA mutation (BRCAm) and fertility was conducted using the PubMed tool to select remarkable articles with the keywords "BRCA1/2 gene," "BRCA1/2 mutation," "anti-Müllerian hormone," "female fertility," "ovarian reserve" and "premature ovarian failure." EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS In current literature there are controversial findings about the relation between BRCA genes mutations and lifespan of female reproductive age. Several studies showed an higher risk of premature ovarian insufficiency of BRCAs mutations carriers, according to lower serum AMH level, primordial follicle count, or fewer oocyte yield after ovarian stimulation; on the other hand more recent studies reported not significant differences in serum AMH level or in reproductive outcomes between mutated and non-mutated BRCA patients. For this reason, currently there is not a strict recommendation for routine evaluation of fertility in female carriers of BRCA mutations. Nevertheless, the strong advice to complete childbearing by age 40 and then to undergo a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and the increased risk of infertility as a result of anticancer treatment in breast cancer BRCAm patients, make the issue of fertility and pregnancy planning in these women worthy of consideration. CONCLUSIONS A dedicated counseling to discuss these issues, eventually associated with a personalized assessment of serum AMH or antral follicle count in order to have a panoramic view of ovarian reserve, may be useful in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Merlino
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy -
| | - Alessandra Chiné
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Cecilia Galli
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria G Piccioni
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Grynberg M, Dagher Hayeck B, Papanikolaou EG, Sifer C, Sermondade N, Sonigo C. BRCA1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro. Hum Reprod 2020; 34:374-379. [PMID: 30561604 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are the maturation rates of oocytes recovered from small antral follicles different between breast cancer patients presenting with or without a BRCA 1/2 gene mutation? SUMMARY ANSWER BRCA 1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. Controversy exists about fertility and ovarian reserve in BRCA mutation carriers. Studies suggest that these patients may have low ovarian reserve and poor response to ovarian stimulation. The impaired ability of the mutated BRCA gene to repair double-strand breaks in DNA may prompt oocyte aging, apoptosis and meiotic errors. IVM of oocytes retrieved at germinal vesicle stage, followed by vitrification of metaphase II (MII) oocytes has recently emerged as an option for young women seeking fertility preservation, when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Retrospective cohort study involving 329 breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation using IVM between January 2014 and December 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Inclusion criteria were: age 18-40 years; two ovaries present; no history of chemotherapy; test for BRCA 1/2 mutations performed. Before immature oocyte retrieval, all follicles measuring 2-9 mm in diameter were precisely counted on both ovaries and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was measured irrespective of the phase of the cycle. Number of cumulus oocyte complexes (COC) retrieved, maturation rate and number of MII oocytes cryopreserved were compared according to BRCA mutation status. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Overall, BRCA-mutated women (n = 52) and BRCA-negative women (n = 277) were comparable in terms of age (31.7 ± 3.9 versus 32.3 ± 3.8 years, respectively, P = 0.3), BMI (23.4 ± 4.7 versus 22.6 ± 3.7 kg/m2, respectively, P = 0.3) and ovarian reserve tests (antral follicle count: 20.5 ± 11.4 versus 21.7 ± 12.1 follicles, P = 0.5; serum AMH levels: 3.6 ± 2.9 versus 4.1 ± 3.6 ng/ml, P = 0.3, respectively). The number of COCs retrieved did not differ significantly between both groups (8.9 ± 6.9 versus 9.9 ± 8.1 oocytes, P = 0.5). After similar IVM rates (67 ± 24 versus 62 ± 23%, P = 0.2), the number of MII oocytes cryopreserved was similar in patients presenting BRCA mutation or not (5.1 ± 3.8 versus 6.1 ± 5.1, P = 0.1, respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Given the low incidence of the mutation, these preliminary findings should be confirmed by further multi-center studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Although BRCA mutations are known to alter DNA repair mechanism, it does not seem to impair oocyte capacity to mature in vitro. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(s) None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Clamart, France.,Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France.,Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,Inserm U1133 Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Bénédicte Dagher Hayeck
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France
| | | | - Christophe Sifer
- Department of Cytogenetic and Reproductive Biology, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France
| | - Nathalie Sermondade
- Department of Cytogenetic and Reproductive Biology, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France
| | - Charlotte Sonigo
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Clamart, France.,Inserm U1185 Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Francies FZ, Hull R, Khanyile R, Dlamini Z. Breast cancer in low-middle income countries: abnormality in splicing and lack of targeted treatment options. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:1568-1591. [PMID: 32509398 PMCID: PMC7269781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a common malignancy among women worldwide. Regardless of the economic status of a country, breast cancer poses a burden in prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Developed countries such as the U.S. have high incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer. Although low incidence rates are observed in developing countries, the mortality rate is on the rise implying that low- to middle-income countries lack the resources for preventative screening for early detection and adequate treatment resources. The differences in incidence between countries can be attributed to changes in exposure to environmental risk factors, behaviour and lifestyle factors of the different population groups. Genomic modifications are an important factor that significantly alters the risk profile of breast tumourigenesis. The incidence of early-onset breast cancer is increasing and evidence shows that early onset of breast cancer is far more aggressive than late onset of the disease; possibly due to the difference in genetic alterations or tumour biology. Alternative splicing is a pivotal factor in the progressions of breast cancer. It plays a significant role in tumour prognosis, survival and drug resistance; hence, it offers a valuable option as a therapeutic target. In this review, the differences in breast cancer incidence and mortality rates in developed countries will be compared to low- to middle-income countries. The review will also discuss environmental and lifestyle risk factors, and the underlying molecular mechanisms, genetic variations or mutations and alternative splicing that may contribute to the development and novel drug targets for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Zita Francies
- SA-MRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health Sciences Hatfield, 0028, South Africa
| | - Rodney Hull
- SA-MRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health Sciences Hatfield, 0028, South Africa
| | - Richard Khanyile
- SA-MRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health Sciences Hatfield, 0028, South Africa
| | - Zodwa Dlamini
- SA-MRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health Sciences Hatfield, 0028, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hu KL, Wang S, Ye X, Zhang D. Effects of BRCA gene mutation on female reproductive potential: A systematic review. Maturitas 2020; 137:11-17. [PMID: 32498931 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Mutation of BRCA genes significantly increases the lifetime risk of breast, ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers. In addition to the increased risk of these multiple malignancies, the recent literature suggests that mutations in BRCA genes may lead to decreased reproductive potential. In this systematic review, we focus on the effect of BRCA gene mutation on reproductive potential. The main outcomes included the rate of nulliparity, ovarian reserve, ovarian response, and the age at natural menopause. A total of 23 observational studies were included for quality analysis. The certainty of evidence was low to moderate: the main limitations were imprecision and statistically significant heterogeneity. Meta-analysis suggested that the rate of nulliparity, serum anti-müllerian hormone levels, antral follicle counts and ovarian response were not significantly affected in BRCA gene mutation carriers (P > 0.05). BRCA gene mutation carriers tended to have a lower number of primordial follicles (P = 0.0002) and lower age at natural menopause than non-carriers. In conclusion, there is no compelling evidence indicating that the rate of nulliparity, serum AMH, antral follicle counts and ovarian response are affected in BRCA mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Lun Hu
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
| | - Siwen Wang
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
| | - Xiaohang Ye
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
| | - Dan Zhang
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Oktay KH, Bedoschi G, Goldfarb SB, Taylan E, Titus S, Palomaki GE, Cigler T, Robson M, Dickler MN. Increased chemotherapy-induced ovarian reserve loss in women with germline BRCA mutations due to oocyte deoxyribonucleic acid double strand break repair deficiency. Fertil Steril 2020; 113:1251-1260.e1. [PMID: 32331767 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether woman who have BRCA mutations (WBM) experience more declines in ovarian reserve after chemotherapy treatment, as it induces oocyte death by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, and BRCA mutations result in DNA damage repair deficiency. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING Academic centers. PATIENT(S) The 108 evaluable women with breast cancer were stratified into those never tested (negative family history; n = 35) and those negative (n = 59) or positive (n = 14) for a pathogenic BRCA mutation. INTERVENTION(S) Sera were longitudinally obtained before and 12-24 months after chemotherapy treatment, assayed for antimüllerian hormone (AMH), and adjusted for age at sample collection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Ovarian recovery, defined as the geometric mean of the after chemotherapy age-adjusted AMH levels compared with baseline levels. RESULT(S) Compared with the controls, the before chemotherapy treatment AMH levels were 24% and 34% lower in those negative or positive for BRCA mutations, consistent with accelerated ovarian aging in WBM. The WBM had a threefold difference in AMH recovery after chemotherapy treatment (1.6%), when compared with BRCA negative (3.7%) and untested/low risk controls (5.2%). Limiting the analysis to the most common regimen, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, showed similar results. These findings were mechanistically confirmed in an in vitro mouse oocyte BRCA knockdown bioassay, which showed that BRCA deficiency results in increased oocyte susceptibility to doxorubicin. CONCLUSION(S) Women who have pathogenic BRCA mutations are more likely to lose ovarian reserve after chemotherapy treatment, suggesting an emphasis on fertility preservation. Furthermore, our findings generate the hypothesis that DNA repair deficiency is a shared mechanism between aging, infertility, and cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00823654.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kutluk H Oktay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Giuliano Bedoschi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Enes Taylan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shiny Titus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Glenn E Palomaki
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital and Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Tessa Cigler
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Mark Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cordeiro Mitchell CN, McGuinness B, Fine E, Kearns WG, Christianson MS, Segars J, Pastore LM. Navigating the body of literature assessing BRCA1/2 mutations and markers of ovarian function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:1037-1055. [PMID: 32212026 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01745-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Twelve percent of women in the USA will develop invasive breast cancer in their lifetime, and that risk increases to 80% if they carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. BRCA1/2 mutations are thought to potentially affect ovarian reserve and/or fertility. METHODS PubMed and PubMed Central were searched for publications on ovarian reserve-related outcomes (i.e., AMH and response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols) that were reported in relation to BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations from 1950 through May 2019. A meta-analysis was conducted to create forest plots and summary effect measures using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS This article reviews the 16 qualifying publications. There were several fundamental methodological differences in the study designs and outcome details reported in AMH studies. Summary statistics found no difference in AMH levels between BRCA1/2+ women as compared with controls (Z overall test effects p ≥ 0.45). Regarding responses to COH, there were overall non-significantly fewer total and mature numbers of oocytes retrieved in BRCA1/2+ cases as compared with controls (meta-analysis Z overall test effects p ≥ 0.40). CONCLUSIONS While the summary measures indicate no significant differences in AMH levels between BRCA1/2+ cases and controls, readers should be aware that there are significant methodological differences in the AMH reports. Additionally, the response to COH protocols does not seem to be significantly lower in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the existing literature. Continued research on both of these clinical parameters would be beneficial for patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina N Cordeiro Mitchell
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | | | - Eliana Fine
- School of Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - William G Kearns
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,AdvaGenix, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Mindy S Christianson
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James Segars
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lisa M Pastore
- OB/GYN and Reproductive Medicine Department, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Clark KL, Keating AF. Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated coordinates the ovarian DNA repair and atresia-initiating response to phosphoramide mustard. Biol Reprod 2020; 102:248-260. [PMID: 31435664 DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioz160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) protein recognizes and repairs DNA double strand breaks through activation of cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair proteins. Atm gene mutations increase female reproductive cancer risk. Phosphoramide mustard (PM) induces ovarian DNA damage and destroys primordial follicles, and pharmacological ATM inhibition prevents PM-induced follicular depletion. Wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 or Atm+/- mice were dosed once intraperitoneally with sesame oil (95%) or PM (25 mg/kg) in the proestrus phase of the estrous cycle and ovaries harvested 3 days thereafter. Atm+/- mice spent ~25% more time in diestrus phase than WT. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) on ovarian protein was performed and bioinformatically analyzed. Relative to WT, Atm+/- mice had 64 and 243 proteins increased or decreased in abundance, respectively. In WT mice, PM increased 162 and decreased 20 proteins. In Atm+/- mice, 173 and 37 proteins were increased and decreased, respectively, by PM. Exportin-2 (XPO2) was localized to granulosa cells of all follicle stages and was 7.2-fold greater in Atm+/- than WT mice. Cytoplasmic FMR1-interacting protein 1 was 6.8-fold lower in Atm+/- mice and was located in the surface epithelium with apparent translocation to the ovarian medulla post-PM exposure. PM induced γH2AX, but fewer γH2AX-positive foci were identified in Atm+/- ovaries. Similarly, cleaved caspase-3 was lower in the Atm+/- PM-treated, relative to WT mice. These findings support ATM involvement in ovarian DNA repair and suggest that ATM functions to regulate ovarian atresia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendra L Clark
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
| | - Aileen F Keating
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Declining BRCA-Mediated DNA Repair in Sperm Aging and its Prevention by Sphingosine-1-Phosphate. Reprod Sci 2020; 27:940-953. [PMID: 31916095 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-019-00098-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Recent data suggest that paternal age can have major impact on reproductive outcomes, and with increased age, there is increased likelihood of chromosomal abnormalities in the sperm. Here, we studied DNA damage and repair as a function of male aging and assessed whether sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a ceramide-induced death inhibitor, can prevent sperm aging by enhancing DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) repair. We observed a significant increase in DNA damage with age and this increase was associated with a decline in the expression of key DNA DSB repair genes in mouse sperm. The haploinsufficiency of BRCA1 male mice sperm showed significantly increased DNA damage and apoptosis, along with decreased chromatin integrity when compared to similar age wild type (WT) mice. Furthermore, haploinsufficiency of BRCA1 male mice had lower sperm count and smaller litter size when crossed with WT females. The resulting embryos had a higher probability of growth arrest and reduced implantation. S1P treatment decreased genotoxic-stress-induced DNA damage in sperm and enhanced the expressions of key DNA repair genes such as BRCA1. Co-treatment with an ATM inhibitor reversed the effects of S1P, implying that the impact of S1P on DNA repair is via the ATM-mediated pathway. Our findings indicate a key role for DNA damage repair mechanism in the maintenance of sperm integrity and suggest that S1P can improve DNA repair in sperm. Further translational studies are warranted to determine the clinical significance of these findings and whether S1P can delay male reproductive aging. There is mounting evidence that sperm quality declines with age, similar to that of the oocyte. However, the reasons behind this decline are poorly understood and there is no medical intervention to improve sperm quality. Our study suggests a strong role for DNA damage repair in maintenance of sperm quality, and for the first time, a potential pharmaceutical approach to prevent sperm aging.
Collapse
|
36
|
Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes in young women with breast cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 37:709-715. [PMID: 31872386 PMCID: PMC7125060 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01658-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcome. The main purpose and research question of the study is to determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes. Methods Prospective study: 67 breast cancer patients between 18 and 40 years old, undergoing a fertility preservation by means of oocyte storage were considered. Inclusions criteria for the study were age between 18 and 40 years old, BMI between 18 and 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage I and II according to American Joint Committee on Cancer classification (2017) and no metastasis. Exclusion criteria: age over 40 years old, BMI < 18 and > 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage III and IV and do not performed the BRCA test. A total of 21 patients had not performed the test and were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups: Group A was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 1 mutations, Group B was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 2 mutations, Group C was composed by 24 women with breast cancer without BRCA mutations, and Group D (control) was composed by 181 normal women. Results Group A showed significant lower AMH levels compared to Group C and D (1.2 ± 1.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.1 p < 0.05 and 1.2 ± 1.1 vs 3.8 ± 2.5 p < 0.05). BRCA1 mutated patients showed a significant lower rate of mature oocytes (MII) compared to Group C (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.2 ± 4.4 p < 0,05) and Group D (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.3 ± 3.4; p < 0,05). Breast cancer patients needed a higher dose of gonadotropins compared to controls (Group A 2206 ± 1392 Group B2047.5 ± 829.9 Group C 2106 ± 1336 Group D 1597 ± 709 p < 0,05). No significant differences were found among the groups considering basal FSH levels, duration of stimulation, number of developed follicles, and number of total retrieved oocytes. Regarding BRCA2 mutation, no effect on fertility was shown in this study. Conclusions The study showed that BRCA1 patients had a higher risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) confirmed by a diminished ovarian reserve and a lower number of mature oocytes suitable for cryopreservation.
Collapse
|
37
|
Reproductive and Hormonal Considerations in Women at Increased Risk for Hereditary Gynecologic Cancers: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine Evidence-Based Review. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 155:508-514. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
38
|
Ter Welle-Butalid MEE, Vriens IJHI, Derhaag JGJ, Leter EME, de Die-Smulders CEC, Smidt MM, van Golde RJTR, Tjan-Heijnen VCGV. Counseling young women with early breast cancer on fertility preservation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:2593-2604. [PMID: 31760547 PMCID: PMC6910894 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01615-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with early-stage breast cancer may still have a future child wish, while chemotherapy may impair fertility. To pursue on fertility preservation shortly after breast cancer diagnosis is complex. This review holds a critical reflection on all topics that need to be counseled to give them the opportunity to make a well-informed decision before starting any oncological treatment. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was performed on papers published in English language on breast cancer in young women, risk of chemotherapy-induced infertility, fertility preservation techniques, impact of possible mutation carriership, and future pregnancy outcome. RESULTS Below 40 years of age, the risk of permanent chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure is approximately 20%, where taxanes do not significantly add to this risk. Overall, 23% of reported women who performed fertility preservation by cryopreserving oocytes or embryos returned for embryo transfer. Of these, 40% gave live birth. Both fertility preservation in women diagnosed with breast cancer and pregnancy after treatment seem safe with respect to breast cancer survival. Women who have a genetic predisposition for breast cancer like BRCA gene mutation should also be informed about the possibility of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Women with an early stage of breast cancer and a possible future child wish should be referred to an expertise center in breast cancer, fertility preservation, and genetics in this complex decision-making process, shortly after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Elena Ter Welle-Butalid
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - I J H Ingeborg Vriens
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J G Josien Derhaag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E M Edward Leter
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C E Christine de Die-Smulders
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M Marjolein Smidt
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R J T Ron van Golde
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - V C G Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Internal Medicine, division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Thomas F, Giraudeau M, Renaud F, Ujvari B, Roche B, Pujol P, Raymond M, Lemaitre JF, Alvergne A. Can postfertile life stages evolve as an anticancer mechanism? PLoS Biol 2019; 17:e3000565. [PMID: 31805037 PMCID: PMC6917346 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Why a postfertile stage has evolved in females of some species has puzzled evolutionary biologists for over 50 years. We propose that existing adaptive explanations have underestimated in their formulation an important parameter operating both at the specific and the individual levels: the balance between cancer risks and cancer defenses. During their life, most multicellular organisms naturally accumulate oncogenic processes in their body. In parallel, reproduction, notably the pregnancy process in mammals, exacerbates the progression of existing tumors in females. When, for various ecological or evolutionary reasons, anticancer defenses are too weak, given cancer risk, older females could not pursue their reproduction without triggering fatal metastatic cancers, nor even maintain a normal reproductive physiology if the latter also promotes the growth of existing oncogenic processes, e.g., hormone-dependent malignancies. At least until stronger anticancer defenses are selected for in these species, females could achieve higher inclusive fitness by ceasing their reproduction and/or going through menopause (assuming that these traits are easier to select than anticancer defenses), thereby limiting the risk of premature death due to metastatic cancers. Because relatively few species experience such an evolutionary mismatch between anticancer defenses and cancer risks, the evolution of prolonged life after reproduction could also be a rare, potentially transient, anticancer adaptation in the animal kingdom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Thomas
- Centre de Recherches Ecologiques et Evolutives sur le Cancer/Centre de Recherches en Ecologie et Evolution de la Santé, Unité Mixte de Recherches, Institut de Recherches pour le Développement 224-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 5290-Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Mathieu Giraudeau
- Centre de Recherches Ecologiques et Evolutives sur le Cancer/Centre de Recherches en Ecologie et Evolution de la Santé, Unité Mixte de Recherches, Institut de Recherches pour le Développement 224-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 5290-Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - François Renaud
- Centre de Recherches Ecologiques et Evolutives sur le Cancer/Centre de Recherches en Ecologie et Evolution de la Santé, Unité Mixte de Recherches, Institut de Recherches pour le Développement 224-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 5290-Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Beata Ujvari
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia
- School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Benjamin Roche
- Centre de Recherches Ecologiques et Evolutives sur le Cancer/Centre de Recherches en Ecologie et Evolution de la Santé, Unité Mixte de Recherches, Institut de Recherches pour le Développement 224-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 5290-Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Unité mixte internationale de Modélisation Mathématique et Informatique des Systèmes Complexes, Unité Mixte de Recherches, Institut de Recherches pour le développement/Sorbonne Université, France
- Departamento de Etología, Fauna Silvestre y Animales de Laboratorio, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México, México
| | - Pascal Pujol
- Centre de Recherches Ecologiques et Evolutives sur le Cancer/Centre de Recherches en Ecologie et Evolution de la Santé, Unité Mixte de Recherches, Institut de Recherches pour le Développement 224-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 5290-Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
| | - Michel Raymond
- ISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-François Lemaitre
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité mixte de recherche 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université Lyon 1 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Alexandra Alvergne
- ISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France
- Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chen LM, Blank SV, Burton E, Glass K, Penick E, Woodard T. Reproductive and hormonal considerations in women at increased risk for hereditary gynecologic cancers: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine Evidence-Based Review. Fertil Steril 2019; 112:1034-1042. [PMID: 31606136 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Providers who care for women at risk for hereditary gynecologic cancers must consider the impact of these conditions on reproductive and hormonal health. This document reviews potential options for cancer prevention, family building, genetic testing and management of surgical menopause in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee-May Chen
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Icahn and Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, New York, New York
| | | | - Karen Glass
- CReATe Fertility Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Penick
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Terri Woodard
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Taylan E, Oktay K. Fertility preservation in gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 155:522-529. [PMID: 31604663 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
An increasing number of women in modern societies are delaying childbearing beyond the age of 35, and gynecologic cancers affect a significant proportion of reproductive age women who wish to preserve fertility for a future chance of childbearing. As a result, providing treatment options for fertility preservation in women with gynecologic cancer has become a crucial component of cancer survivorship care. In this review article, we discussed the current knowledge on fertility-sparing surgical approaches, as well as assisted reproductive technologies that can be utilized to preserve reproductive potential in women with cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer. A brief section on fertility preservation in pediatric gynecologic malignancies is also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enes Taylan
- Women's Cancer Program at Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction and Fertility Preservation, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Kutluk Oktay
- Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction and Fertility Preservation, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation and IVF, New York, NY, USA; Ovarian Transplantation Program, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Garg D, Johnstone EB, Fair DB, Carrell DT, Berga S, Letourneau JM. Oncofertility conundrum: discrepancy between anti-Mϋllerian hormone and mature oocyte yield in a peripubertal girl with Hodgkin lymphoma. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:1753-1756. [PMID: 31313012 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01516-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D Garg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| | - E B Johnstone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - D B Fair
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - D T Carrell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - S Berga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - J M Letourneau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Palinska-Rudzka KE, Ghobara T, Parsons N, Milner J, Lockwood G, Hartshorne GM. Five-year study assessing the clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone measurements in reproductive-age women with cancer. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 39:712-720. [PMID: 31471141 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION An important discussion point before chemotherapy is ovarian toxicity, a side-effect that profoundly affects young women with cancer. Their quality of life after successful treatment, including the ability to conceive, is a major concern. We asked whether serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurements before chemotherapy for two most common malignancies are predictive of long-term changes in ovarian reserve? DESIGN A prospective cohort study measured serum AMH in 66 young women with lymphoma and breast cancer, before and at 1 year and 5 years after chemotherapy, compared with 124 healthy volunteers of the same age range (18-43 years). Contemporaneously, patients reported their menses and live births during 5-year follow-up. RESULTS After adjustment for age, serum AMH was 1.4 times higher (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9; P < 0.02) in healthy volunteers than in cancer patients before chemotherapy. A strong correlation was observed between baseline and 5-year AMH in the breast cancer group (P < 0.001, regression coefficient = 0.58, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.89). No significant association was found between presence of menses at 5 years and serum AMH at baseline (likelihood ratio test from logistics regression analysis). CONCLUSIONS Reproductive-age women with malignancy have lower serum AMH than healthy controls even before starting chemotherapy. Pre-chemotherapy AMH was significantly associated with long-term ovarian function in women with breast cancer. At key time points, AMH measurements could be used as a reproductive health advisory tool for young women with cancer. Our results highlight the unsuitability of return of menstruation as a clinical indicator of ovarian reserve after chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K E Palinska-Rudzka
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
| | - T Ghobara
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
| | - N Parsons
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - J Milner
- CARE Fertility Tamworth House, Ventura Park Road, Tamworth B78 3HL, UK
| | - G Lockwood
- CARE Fertility Tamworth House, Ventura Park Road, Tamworth B78 3HL, UK
| | - G M Hartshorne
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Qian F, Wang S, Mitchell J, McGuffog L, Barrowdale D, Leslie G, Oosterwijk JC, Chung WK, Evans DG, Engel C, Kast K, Aalfs CM, Adank MA, Adlard J, Agnarsson BA, Aittomäki K, Alducci E, Andrulis IL, Arun BK, Ausems MGEM, Azzollini J, Barouk-Simonet E, Barwell J, Belotti M, Benitez J, Berger A, Borg A, Bradbury AR, Brunet J, Buys SS, Caldes T, Caligo MA, Campbell I, Caputo SM, Chiquette J, Claes KBM, Margriet Collée J, Couch FJ, Coupier I, Daly MB, Davidson R, Diez O, Domchek SM, Donaldson A, Dorfling CM, Eeles R, Feliubadaló L, Foretova L, Fowler J, Friedman E, Frost D, Ganz PA, Garber J, Garcia-Barberan V, Glendon G, Godwin AK, Gómez Garcia EB, Gronwald J, Hahnen E, Hamann U, Henderson A, Hendricks CB, Hopper JL, Hulick PJ, Imyanitov EN, Isaacs C, Izatt L, Izquierdo Á, Jakubowska A, Kaczmarek K, Kang E, Karlan BY, Kets CM, Kim SW, Kim Z, Kwong A, Laitman Y, Lasset C, Hyuk Lee M, Won Lee J, Lee J, Lester J, Lesueur F, Loud JT, Lubinski J, Mebirouk N, Meijers-Heijboer HEJ, Meindl A, Miller A, Montagna M, Mooij TM, Morrison PJ, Mouret-Fourme E, Nathanson KL, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Niederacher D, Nielsen FC, Nussbaum RL, Offit K, Olah E, Ong KR, Ottini L, Park SK, Peterlongo P, Pfeiler G, Phelan CM, Poppe B, Pradhan N, Radice P, Ramus SJ, Rantala J, Robson M, Rodriguez GC, Schmutzler RK, Hutten Selkirk CG, Shah PD, Simard J, Singer CF, Sokolowska J, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sutter C, Yen Tan Y, Teixeira RM, Teo SH, Terry MB, Thomassen M, Tischkowitz M, Toland AE, Tucker KM, Tung N, van Asperen CJ, van Engelen K, van Rensburg EJ, Wang-Gohrke S, Wappenschmidt B, Weitzel JN, Yannoukakos D, Greene MH, Rookus MA, Easton DF, Chenevix-Trench G, Antoniou AC, Goldgar DE, Olopade OI, Rebbeck TR, Huo D. Height and Body Mass Index as Modifiers of Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: A Mendelian Randomization Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111:350-364. [PMID: 30312457 PMCID: PMC6449171 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 06/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRCA1/2 mutations confer high lifetime risk of breast cancer, although other factors may modify this risk. Whether height or body mass index (BMI) modifies breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers remains unclear. METHODS We used Mendelian randomization approaches to evaluate the association of height and BMI on breast cancer risk, using data from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 with 14 676 BRCA1 and 7912 BRCA2 mutation carriers, including 11 451 cases of breast cancer. We created a height genetic score using 586 height-associated variants and a BMI genetic score using 93 BMI-associated variants. We examined both observed and genetically determined height and BMI with breast cancer risk using weighted Cox models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Observed height was positively associated with breast cancer risk (HR = 1.09 per 10 cm increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0 to 1.17; P = 1.17). Height genetic score was positively associated with breast cancer, although this was not statistically significant (per 10 cm increase in genetically predicted height, HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.17; P = .47). Observed BMI was inversely associated with breast cancer risk (per 5 kg/m2 increase, HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90 to 0.98; P = .007). BMI genetic score was also inversely associated with breast cancer risk (per 5 kg/m2 increase in genetically predicted BMI, HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.98; P = .02). BMI was primarily associated with premenopausal breast cancer. CONCLUSION Height is associated with overall breast cancer and BMI is associated with premenopausal breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Incorporating height and BMI, particularly genetic score, into risk assessment may improve cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Qian
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Shengfeng Wang
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Jonathan Mitchell
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel Barrowdale
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Goska Leslie
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cora M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Center for Medical Genetics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Muriel A Adank
- Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julian Adlard
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bjarni A Agnarsson
- Department of Pathology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
- School of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Elisa Alducci
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Banu K Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS (Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Emmanuelle Barouk-Simonet
- Oncogénétique, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Julian Barwell
- Leicestershire Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBGI (Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona), Catalan Institute of Oncology, CIBERONC, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Javier Benitez
- Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Cancer Prevention & Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andreas Berger
- Department of Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ake Borg
- Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Centre for Life, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Angela R Bradbury
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joan Brunet
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Valencia, Spain, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Trinidad Caldes
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria A Caligo
- Section of Genetic Oncology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University and University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sandrine M Caputo
- Leicestershire Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Jocelyne Chiquette
- Unité de recherche en santé des populations, Centre des maladies du sein Deschênes-Fabia, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, Québec, QC, Canada
| | | | - J Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Isabelle Coupier
- Unité d'Oncogénétique, CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- Department of Clinical Genetics, South Glasgow University Hospitals, Glasgow, UK
| | - Orland Diez
- N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alan Donaldson
- Oncogenetics Group, Clinical and Molecular Genetics Area, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (OD); Clinical Genetics Department, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Cecilia M Dorfling
- Department of Genetics, University of Pretoria, Arcadia, South Africa
- City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network, Duarte, CA
| | - Ros Eeles
- Ocogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, ICO-IDIBELL (Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jeffrey Fowler
- The Ohio State University, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH
| | - Eitan Friedman
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Debra Frost
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Cancer Prevention & Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, CA
| | - Judy Garber
- Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Vanesa Garcia-Barberan
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gord Glendon
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Encarna B Gómez Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Centers for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Integrated Oncology and Molecular Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Alex Henderson
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Centre for Life, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Carolyn B Hendricks
- City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network, Duarte, CA
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter J Hulick
- Center for Medical Genetics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC (CI)
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ángel Izquierdo
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBGI (Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona), Catalan Institute of Oncology, CIBERONC, Girona, Spain
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Kaczmarek
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Eunyoung Kang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Carolien M Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Daerim Saint Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Zisun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Ava Kwong
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
- Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
| | - Yael Laitman
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Christine Lasset
- Unité de Prévention et d’Epidémiologie Génétique, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Min Hyuk Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine and Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Ulsan University College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihyoun Lee
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine and Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jenny Lester
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer team, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- U900, INSERM, Paris, France
- PSL University, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
| | - Jennifer T Loud
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Clinical Genetics and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Noura Mebirouk
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer team, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- U900, INSERM, Paris, France
- PSL University, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
| | | | - Alfons Meindl
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
- NRG Oncology, Statistics and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Austin Miller
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Montagna
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Thea M Mooij
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick J Morrison
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Dieter Niederacher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Finn C Nielsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Robert L Nussbaum
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Laboratory, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Edith Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Kai-Ren Ong
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women’s Hospital Healthcare NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Laura Ottini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Sue K Park
- Departments of Preventive Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- IFOM, The FIRC (Italian Foundation for Cancer Research) Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Georg Pfeiler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Bruce Poppe
- Centre for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nisha Pradhan
- Clinical Genetics Research Laboratory, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS (Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Mark Robson
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gustavo C Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Evanston, IL
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Centers for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Integrated Oncology and Molecular Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Payal D Shah
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jacques Simard
- Laboratoire de génétique médicale, Nancy Université, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johanna Sokolowska
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Center, Laval University, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Department of Tumour Biology, Institut Curie, INSERM U830, Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yen Yen Tan
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Valencia, Spain, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Manuel Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Soo H Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cancer Research Institute, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nadine Tung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Klaartje van Engelen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Shan Wang-Gohrke
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Centers for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Integrated Oncology and Molecular Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research ‘Demokritos’, Athens, Greece
| | - GEMO Study Collaborators
- Department of Tumour Biology, Institut Curie, INSERM U830, Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - HEBON
- The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands
- Coordinating Center, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - EMBRACE
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark H Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Matti A Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Dezheng Huo
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (DH)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vuković P, Kasum M, Raguž J, Lonjak N, Bilić Knežević S, Orešković I, Beketić Orešković L, Čehić E. FERTILITY PRESERVATION IN YOUNG WOMEN WITH EARLY-STAGE BREAST CANCER. Acta Clin Croat 2019; 58:147-156. [PMID: 31363337 PMCID: PMC6629203 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Although breast cancer (BC) occurs more often in older women, it is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women of childbearing age. Owing to the overall advancement of modern medicine and the growing global trend of delaying childbirth until later age, we find ever more younger women diagnosed and treated for BC who have not yet completed their family. Therefore, fertility preservation has emerged as a very important quality of life issue for young BC survivors. This paper reviews currently available options for fertility preservation in young women with early-stage BC and highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to fertility preservation as a very important quality of life issue for young BC survivors. Pregnancy after BC treatment is considered not to be associated with an increased risk of BC recurrence; therefore, it should not be discouraged for those women who want to achieve pregnancy after oncologic treatment. Currently, it is recommended to delay pregnancy for at least 2 years after BC diagnosis, when the risk of recurrence is highest. However, BC patients of reproductive age should be informed about the potential negative effects of oncologic therapy on fertility, as well as on the fertility preservation options available, and if interested in fertility preservation, they should be promptly referred to a reproductive specialist. Early referral to a reproductive specialist is an important factor that increases the likelihood of successful fertility preservation. Embryo and mature oocyte cryopreservation are currently the only established fertility preservation methods but they require ovarian stimulation (OS), which delays initiation of chemotherapy for at least 2 weeks. Controlled OS does not seem to increase the risk of BC recurrence. Other fertility preservation methods (ovarian tissue cryopreservation, cryopreservation of immature oocytes and ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists) do not require OS but are still considered to be experimental techniques for fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miro Kasum
- 1Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zadar General Hospital, Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 6Human Reproduction Unit, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Jelena Raguž
- 1Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zadar General Hospital, Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 6Human Reproduction Unit, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Nikolina Lonjak
- 1Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zadar General Hospital, Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 6Human Reproduction Unit, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Sara Bilić Knežević
- 1Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zadar General Hospital, Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 6Human Reproduction Unit, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ivana Orešković
- 1Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zadar General Hospital, Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 6Human Reproduction Unit, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Lidija Beketić Orešković
- 1Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zadar General Hospital, Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 6Human Reproduction Unit, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ermin Čehić
- 1Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zadar General Hospital, Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Zadar, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 6Human Reproduction Unit, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Peccatori FA, Mangili G, Bergamini A, Filippi F, Martinelli F, Ferrari F, Noli S, Rabaiotti E, Candiani M, Somigliana E. Fertility preservation in women harboring deleterious BRCA mutations: ready for prime time? Hum Reprod 2019; 33:181-187. [PMID: 29207007 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Fertility issues have become critical in the management and counseling of BRCA mutation carriers. In this setting four points deserve consideration. (1) Women in general lose their ability to conceive at a mean age of 41 years, thus the suggested policy of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at age 40 for BRCA mutation carriers does not affect the chances of natural pregnancy. Conversely, if the procedure is chosen at 35 years old, oocyte cryopreservation prior to surgery should be considered. (2) Some evidence suggests that ovarian reserve may actually be partly reduced in BRCA mutations carriers and that the mutation may affect ovarian responsiveness to stimulation. However, these findings are still controversial. (3) Breast cancer is not rare before the age of 40 and fertility preservation after diagnosis can be requested in a significant proportion of BRCA mutation carriers. Thus, a policy of oocyte cryopreservation in young healthy carriers deserves consideration. The procedure could be considered at a young age and in an elective setting, when ovarian stimulation may yield more oocytes of better quality. (4) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) could be considered in BRCA mutations carriers, particularly when good quality oocytes have been stored at a young age. Based on the current knowledge, a univocal approach cannot be recommended; in depth patient counseling is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via S. Luca 8, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Mangili
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Bergamini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Filippi
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Via G. Venezian, 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Ferrari
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Via S. Luca 8, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Noli
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via S. Luca 8, 20122 Milan, Italy.,Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milan, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Rabaiotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Candiani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Edgardo Somigliana
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milan, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
BRCA mutations and reproduction. Fertil Steril 2018; 109:33-38. [PMID: 29307397 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Deleterious mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have long been recognized as independent risk factors, mostly for breast and ovarian cancer. Numerous studies have evaluated the molecular processes involving these genes, the pathophysiology of BRCAness, follow up options and modes of prophylaxis. The fertility of BRCA carriers, however, has not been widely investigated. The aim of the present work is to review the literature pertaining to this issue.
Collapse
|
48
|
Derks-Smeets IAP, Schrijver LH, de Die-Smulders CEM, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Golde RJT, Smits LJ, Caanen B, van Asperen CJ, Ausems M, Collée M, van Engelen K, Kets CM, van der Kolk L, Oosterwijk JC, van Os TAM, Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE, Gómez García EB. Ovarian stimulation for IVF and risk of primary breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:357-363. [PMID: 29937543 PMCID: PMC6068188 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0139-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) on breast cancer risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is rarely examined. As carriers may increasingly undergo IVF as part of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), we examined the impact of ovarian stimulation for IVF on breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. METHODS The study population consisted of 1550 BRCA1 and 964 BRCA2 mutation carriers, derived from the nationwide HEBON study and the nationwide PGD registry. Questionnaires, clinical records and linkages with the Netherlands Cancer Registry were used to collect data on IVF exposure, risk-reducing surgeries and cancer diagnosis, respectively. Time-dependent Cox regression analyses were conducted, stratified for birth cohort and adjusted for subfertility. RESULTS Of the 2514 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, 3% (n = 76) were exposed to ovarian stimulation for IVF. In total, 938 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (37.3%) were diagnosed with breast cancer. IVF exposure was not associated with risk of breast cancer (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.46-1.36). Similar results were found for the subgroups of subfertile women (n = 232; HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.39-1.37) and BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.60-2.09). In addition, age at and recency of first IVF treatment were not associated with breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION No evidence was found for an association between ovarian stimulation for IVF and breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge A P Derks-Smeets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lieske H Schrijver
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christine E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ron J T van Golde
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Luc J Smits
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Beppy Caanen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet Ausems
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Klaartje van Engelen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Marleen Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lizet van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Theo A M van Os
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Matti A Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Encarna B Gómez García
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Premature ovarian aging in BRCA carriers: a prototype of systemic precocious aging? Oncotarget 2018; 9:15931-15941. [PMID: 29662617 PMCID: PMC5882308 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Though former evidence implies a correlation of breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation with reduced ovarian reserve, the data is yet inconsistent. Our aim was to investigate biomarkers of ovarian aging in a cohort of young healthy carriers of the BRCA mutation. We hypothesized that the role played by BRCA genes in aging pathways is not exclusive to the ovary. Experimental Design Healthy female BRCA carriers, 40 years or younger and healthy male BRCA carriers, 50 years or younger, were enrolled in the study. Serum anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), Klotho and IL-1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ovarian AMH and protein kinase B (AKT) mRNA from BRCA carriers who underwent prophylactic oophorectomy and from age-matched, healthy, non-carriers who underwent partial oophorectomy due to benign conditions were analyzed by qPCR. Results Thirty-three female (median age 35y) and 20 male (44y) BRCA carriers were enrolled into the study and matched to control non-carriers (34y and 43y, respectively). Serum AMH level was significantly lower in BRCA female carriers than in both non-carrier controls and age-matched nomograms. The levels of ovarian AMH and AKT mRNA were significantly lower in carriers than in controls. The systemic aging cytokines FGF-23, klotho and IL-1 displayed a differential expression in carriers of both genders. FGF-23 level was higher in carriers (P=0.06). Conclusions Our results suggest a link between BRCA mutation, accelerated ovarian aging and systemic aging-related pathophysiology.
Collapse
|
50
|
Grynberg M, Raad J, Comtet M, Vinolas C, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Sonigo C. Fertility preservation in BRCA-mutated women: when and how? Future Oncol 2018; 14:483-490. [PMID: 29327596 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA 1 and 2 genes play a critical role in the safeguarding of DNA integrity. It is now well established that BRCA1 and BRCA2-mutated women are at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancers. However, several lines of evidence indicate that this genetic status may also be associated with ovarian dysfunction, in particular a reduced ovarian reserve. Considering the gonadal toxicity of cancer treatments and the recommendation of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy around 40 years, young BRCA mutation carriers are confronted with difficult family planning decisions. Recent development in fertility preservation offers new possibilities for these women, not only before a potential cancer treatment, but also in healthy carriers. If the pregnancy seems to be safe in this population, oocyte vitrification following ovarian stimulation might help BRCA-mutated patients to conceive after cancer treatment or to undergo prenatal genetic diagnosis in order to avoid the risk of transmitting the genetic abnormality to their offspring. The present article aims to extensively discuss the fertility issues related to BRCA gene mutations and the questions raised by the possibility of fertility in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.,University Paris Sud XI, 94276, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,Unité Inserm U1133, Université Paris-Diderot, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Jade Raad
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France
| | - Marjorie Comtet
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France.,University Paris XIII, 93017, Bobigny, France
| | - Claire Vinolas
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France
| | - Isabelle Cédrin-Durnerin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France
| | - Charlotte Sonigo
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.,Inserm U1185, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94276, France
| |
Collapse
|