The role of C-reactive protein in prostate cancer

The Role of C-Reactive Protein in the Prognosis of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

To investigate the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

The studies related to C-reactive protein and prostate cancer were searched by computer, including PubMed and Web of Science. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to August 2022. QUADAS score was employed to assess the studies' quality, funnel plot was employed to analyze the bias of the included studies, and RevMan and STATA statistical software programs were used to draw forest maps to represent the analysis results.

Results

In the initial examination, 432 articles were obtained. After removing the duplicate articles, reading the abstract and theme, and then reading the full text, 12 articles finally met the inclusion criteria. The results revealed that serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with PCa (OR = 1.47 [1.19, 1.82], P < 0.05), and patients with high CRP levels had an increased risk of developing prostate cancer (HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.29). However, there was no obvious difference in circulating CRP levels between patients with prostate cancer and healthy controls (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

CRP levels are associated with PCa patients' OS. High CRP levels have an elevated incidence of PCa, but there was no obvious distinction in circulating CRP levels between patients with prostate cancer and healthy controls. Therefore, C-reactive protein has certain reference value for judging the prognosis of prostate cancer.

Serum biomarkers of inflammation for diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with nonspecific elevations of serum prostate specific antigen levels

Background

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are biomarkers of inflammation commonly used in medicine. The aim was to evaluate the utility of serum LDH and CRP levels for diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) in men with nonspecific elevations of serum total prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels.

Methods

The following serum biomarkers were measured in patients with PSA between 4 and 10 ng/mL: LDH, CRP and free-PSA. The free-to-total serum PSA ratio (%fPSA) was (free-PSA/PSA) ×100. Patients were classified into two groups according to diagnosis of prostate biopsy: PC and NOT PC patients. Logistic regression was used for develop a probabilistic model to predict PC patients. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

Results

We studied 232 patients with ages between 43 and 98 years old (median =72), 200 NOT PC and 32 PC patients. CRP was not statistically significantl to differentiate between PC and NOT PC patients. Probabilistic model (%) was 100× (1+ e^−Z)⁻¹; (Z =0.0070× LDH –0.1589× %fPSA –1.4898). The AUCs were 0.657 (P=0.0048), 0.802 (P<0.0001), and 0.844 (P<0.0001) for serum LDH levels, %fPSA values and probabilistic model, respectively.

Conclusions

CRP was not useful to differentiate benign from malignant prostate disease, in contrast LDH could be used for diagnosis of PC. A probabilistic model using LDH and %fPSA can improve the diagnostic accuracy in patients with PSA between 4 and 10 ng/mL.

C-reactive Protein in HPV-Positive and HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharynx cancer as compared with HPV-negative oropharynx cancer and determine if CRP levels were associated with overall survival and/or recurrence-free survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic cancer center between 2007 and 2010.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Among patients with oropharynx cancer and confirmed HPV status, plasma CRP levels were measured with a high-sensitivity ELISA kit. Multivariable logistic regression analysis compared 4 categories of CRP (low, moderate, high, very high) between the HPV-positive and HPV-negative groups. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were used to determine overall survival and recurrence-free survival by CRP level in both populations.

RESULTS

Between 113 HPV-positive and 110 HPV-negative patients, CRP levels were significantly higher in the HPV-positive group, but these levels did not demonstrate a statistically significant dose-response trend. Higher CRP levels were also associated with reduced overall survival ( P = .016) and recurrence-free survival ( P < .001) within the HPV-negative group in univariable analysis; in multivariate analysis, the comparisons were not significantly different. Within HPV-positive oropharynx cancer, CRP levels were not significantly associated with overall survival or recurrence-free survival in univariable or multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

Circulating CRP was higher in HPV-positive versus HPV-negative oropharynx cancer. Among HPV-negative patients, higher CRP levels were associated with reduced survival.

A New Preoperative Prognostic System Combining CRP and CA199 For Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Objectives:

In this study, we aimed at investigating the preoperatively available prognostic factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients and proposing a new preoperative prognostic scoring system for ICC.

Methods:

A total of 246 consecutive ICC patients who underwent curative hepatectomy were enrolled retrospectively and were randomly divided into training (n=164) and validation cohorts (n=82) at a ratio of 2:1. The prognostic factors were investigated in both cohorts using multivariate Cox’s proportional hazards regression model.

Results:

Multivariate analyses identified that two preoperative factors (serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels >4.1 mg/l (hazard ratio (HR): 2.75, 95% CI: 1.65–4.73, P<0.001) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels >300 mg/ml (HR: 3.76, 95% CI: 2.18–6.49)) were independent prognostic factors for postoperative survival in the training cohort. The results were further confirmed in the validation cohort. On the basis of these data, a preoperative prognostic score (PPS) was established by allocating 0 or 1 point to the two factors, respectively. Then, both in the training and validation cohorts, the PPS showed the power to stratify patients into three distinct groups (groups with scores 2, 1, and 0) with significant difference in the risk of postoperative death.

Conclusions:

A new preoperative scoring system consisting of preoperative CRP and CA19-9 levels could effectively predict postoperative survival of ICC patients.