1
|
Wiltink LM, Miah AB, Scholten AN, Haas RL. Unraveling the Myth of Radiation Resistance in Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:172-179. [PMID: 38508782 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
There is a misconception that sarcomas are resistant to radiotherapy. This manuscript summarizes available (pre-) clinical data on the radiosensitivity of soft tissue sarcomas. Currently, clinical practice guidelines suggest irradiating sarcomas in 1.8-2 Gy once daily fractions. Careful observation of myxoid liposarcomas patients during preoperative radiotherapy led to the discovery of this subtype's remarkable radiosensitivity. It resulted subsequently in an international prospective clinical trial demonstrating the safety of a reduced total dose, yet still delivered with conventional 1.8-2 Gy fractions. In several areas of oncology, especially for tumors of epithelial origin where radiotherapy plays a curative role, the concurrent application of systemic compounds aiming for radiosensitization has been incorporated into routine clinical practice. This approach has also been investigated in sarcomas and is summarized in this manuscript. Observing relatively low α/β ratios after preclinical cellular investigations, investigators have explored hypofractionation with daily doses ranging from 2.85-8.0 Gy per day in prospective clinical studies, and the data are presented. Finally, we summarize work with mouse models and genomic investigations to predict observed responses to radiotherapy in sarcoma patients. Taken together, these data indicate that sarcomas are not resistant to radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Wiltink
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - A B Miah
- Department of Radiotherapy and Physics, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - A N Scholten
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - R L Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Connell NS, Wages NA, Garrett-Mayer E. Quasi-partial order continual reassessment method: Applying toxicity scores to cancer dose-finding drug combination trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 125:107050. [PMID: 36529437 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The primary endpoint of most dose-finding cancer trials is patient toxicity, and the primary goal is to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), that is, the highest dose that falls below or within a pre-specified toxicity tolerability threshold. Conventionally, dose-finding methods have utilized a binary toxicity endpoint based on whether or not a patient experiences a dose limiting-toxicity (DLT). Improving upon this, in recent years several methods have been developed for modeling toxicity scores, a novel continuous endpoint designed to more precisely estimate patient toxicity burden. Separately, drug-combination trials have become increasingly prevalent, and due to added complexities regarding estimating 'true' dose ordering and potential for more complex patient toxicity profiles, provide an ideal setting which may benefit from the improved precision of toxicity scores. In this paper, we merge two frameworks based on the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) - the Quasi-CRM and the Partial Order CRM (POCRM) - to propose a novel approach for modeling toxicity scores in a combination-trial setting. We demonstrate that utilizing toxicity scores has the potential to greatly improve correct dose-selection over a variety of trial scenarios. We further present a simple adaptation to the toxicity-score model to control for potential over-dosing issues such that it adheres to the conventional DLT definition and will, at worst, perform equivalently to that of the traditional binary DLT framework. We demonstrate that extending toxicity scores to the combination-trial setting offers potential for improvement over the conventional binary endpoint models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel S O'Connell
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
| | - Nolan A Wages
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
- Center for Research and Analytics, American Society for Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
von Mehren M, Kane JM, Agulnik M, Bui MM, Carr-Ascher J, Choy E, Connelly M, Dry S, Ganjoo KN, Gonzalez RJ, Holder A, Homsi J, Keedy V, Kelly CM, Kim E, Liebner D, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Mesko NW, Meyer C, Pappo AS, Parkes AM, Petersen IA, Pollack SM, Poppe M, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Shabason J, Sicklick JK, Spraker MB, Zimel M, Hang LE, Sundar H, Bergman MA. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:815-833. [PMID: 35830886 PMCID: PMC10186762 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Soft Tissue Sarcoma provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines discusses general principles for the diagnosis and treatment of retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, outlines treatment recommendations, and reviews the evidence to support the guidelines recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Edwin Choy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | - Mary Connelly
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Sarah Dry
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Jade Homsi
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Edward Kim
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | - David Liebner
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Nathan W Mesko
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Christian Meyer
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Alberto S Pappo
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | - Seth M Pollack
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | - Jacob Shabason
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Matthew B Spraker
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Melissa Zimel
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
p38β (MAPK11) mediates gemcitabine-associated radiosensitivity in sarcoma experimental models. Radiother Oncol 2020; 156:136-144. [PMID: 33310004 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Gemcitabine is an antitumour agent currently used in the treatment of several types of cancer with known properties as a radiosensitizer. p38MAPK signalling pathway has been shown to be a major determinant in the cellular response to gemcitabine in different experimental models. However, the molecular mechanism implicated in gemcitabine-associated radiosensitivity remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS The human sarcoma cell lines A673 and HT1080, and a mouse cell line derived from a 3-methylcholanthrene induced sarcoma were used as experimental models. Modulation of p38MAPKs was performed by pharmacological approaches (SB203580) and genetic interference using lentiviral vectors coding for specific shRNAs. Viability was assessed by MTT. Gene expression was evaluated by western blot and RT-qPCR. Induction of apoptosis was monitored by caspase 3/7 activity. Response to ionizing radiation was evaluated by clonogenic assays. RESULTS Our data demonstrate that chemical inhibition of p38MAPK signalling pathway blocks gemcitabine radiosensitizing potential. Genetic interference of MAPK14 (p38α), the most abundantly expressed and best characterized p38MAPK, despite promoting resistance to gemcitabine, it does not affect its radiosensitizing potential. Interestingly, specific knockdown of MAPK11 (p38β) induces a total loss of the radiosensitivity associated to gemcitabine, as well as a marked increase in the resistance to the drug. CONCLUSION The present work identifies p38β as a major determinant of the radiosensitizing potential of gemcitabine without implication of p38α, suggesting that p38β status should be analysed in those cases in which gemcitabine is combined with ionizing radiation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Adverse Event Burden Score-A Versatile Summary Measure for Cancer Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113251. [PMID: 33158080 PMCID: PMC7694214 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In cancer clinical trials, adverse event data are collected after every treatment cycle, using the Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events, which includes 837 terms. The vast number of potentially reportable adverse events over multiple treatment cycles makes summarizing and analyzing adverse event data challenging. The current standard reporting of adverse event data includes the frequency of the maximum (worst) grade of commonly occurring adverse events. In this article, we propose a single quantitative summary measure that incorporates both the frequency and the severity of multiple adverse events over time; the adverse event burden score. This score is a well-defined measure that enables statistical comparisons analogous to other quantitative endpoints in clinical trials. The adverse event burden score can readily accommodate different trial settings, diseases, and treatments, with diverse safety profiles. Abstract This article introduces the adverse event (AE) burden score. The AE burden by treatment cycle is a weighted sum of all grades and AEs that the patient experienced in a cycle. The overall AE burden score is the total AE burden the patient experienced across all treatment cycles. AE data from two completed Alliance multi-center randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials, with different AE profiles (NCCTG 97-24-51: 176 patients, and A091105: 83 patients), were utilized for illustration. Results of the AE burden score analyses corroborated the trials’ primary results. In 97-24-51, the overall AE burden for patients on the treatment arm was 2.2 points higher than those on the placebo arm, with a higher AE burden for patients who went off treatment early due to AE. Similarly, in A091105, the overall AE burden was 1.6 points higher on the treatment arm. On the placebo arms, the AE burden in 97-24-51 remained constant over time; and increased in later cycles in A091105, likely attributable to the increase in disease morbidity. The AE burden score enables statistical comparisons analogous to other quantitative endpoints in clinical trials, and can readily accommodate different trial settings, diseases, and treatments, with diverse AE profiles.
Collapse
|
6
|
Llacer-Moscardo C, Terlizzi M, Bonvalot S, Le Loarer F, Carrère S, Tetrau R, D'ascoli A, Lerouge D, Le Péchoux C, Thariat J. Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:501-512. [PMID: 32807685 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Sarcomas are rare tumours arising from mesenchymal tissue. A multimodal management in an expert centre combining surgery and radiotherapy is the current standard of care for localized soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities, to enable limb-sparing strategies. The delivery of pre- radiotherapy or postoperative radiotherapy offers similar local control and survival rates but the toxicity profile is quite different: preoperative radiotherapy increases the risk of wound complications and postoperative radiotherapy affects long-term functional outcomes. While postoperative radiotherapy has long been the rule, especially in Europe, technical improvements with image-guided- and intensity-modulated radiotherapy associated with a better management of postoperative wounds has tended to change practices with more frequent preoperative radiotherapy. More recently the possibilities of a hypofractionated regimen or potentiation by nanoparticles to increase the therapeutic index plead in favour of a preoperative delivery of radiotherapy. The aim of this paper is to report pros and cons of pre- and post-operative radiotherapy for soft-tissue sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Llacer-Moscardo
- Radiation Oncology Department, institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, avenue des Apothicaires, parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
| | - M Terlizzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, 1, avenue Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France
| | - S Bonvalot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - F Le Loarer
- Department of Pathology, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, CS 61283, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - S Carrère
- Department of Surgical Oncology, institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, avenue des Apothicaires, parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France
| | - R Tetrau
- Radiology Department, institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, avenue des Apothicaires, parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France
| | - A D'ascoli
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Surgery, hôpital Pasteur 2, Institut universitaire locomoteur et sports (IULS), 30, voie Romaine, 06000 Nice, France
| | - D Lerouge
- Radiation Oncology Department, centre François-Baclesse, 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Association Advance Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - C Le Péchoux
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| | - J Thariat
- Radiation Oncology Department, centre François-Baclesse, 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Association Advance Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy-Related Wound Morbidity in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Perspectives for Radioprotective Agents. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082258. [PMID: 32806601 PMCID: PMC7465163 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Historically, patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities would undergo limb amputation. It was subsequently determined that the addition of radiation therapy (RT) delivered prior to (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) a limb-sparing surgical resection yielded equivalent survival outcomes to amputation in appropriate patients. Generally, neoadjuvant radiation offers decreased volume and dose of high-intensity radiation to normal tissue and increased chance of achieving negative surgical margins-but also increases wound healing complications when compared to adjuvant radiotherapy. This review elaborates on the current neoadjuvant/adjuvant RT approaches, wound healing complications in STS, and the potential application of novel radioprotective agents to minimize radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity.
Collapse
|
8
|
Zaidi MY, Ethun CG, Tran TB, Poultsides G, Grignol VP, Howard JH, Bedi M, Mogal H, Tseng J, Roggin KK, Chouliaras K, Votanopoulos K, Krasnick B, Fields RC, Oskouei S, Reimer N, Monson D, Maithel SK, Cardona K. Assessing the Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary High-Risk Truncal/Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: An Analysis of the Multi-institutional U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:3542-3549. [PMID: 31342400 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07639-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is questioned. This study aimed to define which patients may experience a survival advantage with NCT. METHODS All the patients from the U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative database (2000-2016) who underwent curative-intent resection of high-grade, primary truncal/extremity STS size 5 cm or larger were included in this study. The primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of the 4153 patients, 770 were included in the study. The median tumor size was 10 cm, and 669 of the patients (87%) had extremity tumors. The most common histology was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), found in 42% of the patients. Of the 770 patients, 216 (28%) received NCT. The patients who received NCT had deeper, larger tumors (p < 0.001). Of the patients with tumors 5 cm or larger and 8 cm or larger, NCT was not associated with improved RFS or OS. However for the patients with tumors 10 cm or larger, NCT was associated with improved 5-year RFS (51% vs 40%; p = 0.053) and 5-year OS (58% vs 47%; p = 0.043). By location, the patients with extremity tumors 10 cm or larger but not truncal tumors had improved 5-yearr RFS (54% vs 42%; p = 0.042) and 5-year OS (61% vs 47%; p = 0.015) with NCT. According to histology, no subtype had improved RFS or OS with NCT, although the patients with UPS had a trend toward improved 5-year RFS (56% vs 42%; p = 0.092) and 5-year OS (66% vs 52%; p = 0.103) with NCT. CONCLUSION For the patients with high-grade STS, NCT was associated with improved RFS and OS when tumors were 10 cm or larger and located in the extremity. However, no histiotype-specific advantage was identified. Future studies assessing the efficacy of NCT may consider focusing on these patients, with added focus on histology-specific strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Y Zaidi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Cecilia G Ethun
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Thuy B Tran
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - George Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Valerie P Grignol
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - J Harrison Howard
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Meena Bedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Harveshp Mogal
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jennifer Tseng
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kevin K Roggin
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Brad Krasnick
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shervin Oskouei
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nickolas Reimer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David Monson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kenneth Cardona
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gronchi A, Hindi N, Cruz J, Blay JY, Lopez-Pousa A, Italiano A, Alvarez R, Gutierrez A, Rincón I, Sangalli C, Pérez Aguiar JL, Romero J, Morosi C, Sunyach MP, Sanfilippo R, Romagosa C, Ranchere-Vince D, Dei Tos AP, Casali PG, Martin-Broto J. Trabectedin and RAdiotherapy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma (TRASTS): Results of a Phase I Study in Myxoid Liposarcoma from Spanish (GEIS), Italian (ISG), French (FSG) Sarcoma Groups. EClinicalMedicine 2019; 9:35-43. [PMID: 31143880 PMCID: PMC6510725 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myxoid liposarcoma (ML) exhibits a special sensitivity to trabectedin (T) and radiation therapy (RT). Preclinical data suggest a synergistic effect. We aimed to study safety, feasibility and activity of the administration of pre-operative concurrent T and RT in patients affected by localized resectable ML. METHODS Patients received 3 cycles (C) of T in combination with RT (45 Gy) in 25 fractions (1.8 Gy/fraction). Dose Levels for T were: - 1 (1.1 mg/m2), 0 (1.3 mg/m2) and 1 (1.5 mg/m2). Primary endpoint was safety; antitumor activity was assessed by RECIST and Choi criteria. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02275286. The phase 1 part of the study is complete and phase 2 is ongoing. FINDINGS From February 2015 to May 2016, 14 patients (M/F 7/7), median age 36 years (range 24-70) and median tumor size 12.5 cm (range 7-17 cm), were enrolled. One dose limiting toxicity (G3 transaminitis) occurred at Level 0 and one (sepsis due to catheter infection) at Level 1. All patients completed RT. Five patients achieved PR (36%), 8 SD (57%), 1 distant PD (7%) by RECIST, while 12 achieved PR (86%), 1 SD (7%) and 1 distant PD (7%) by Choi criteria. Twelve patients underwent surgery. Median viable residual tumor was 5% (0-60). INTERPRETATION T in combination with RT showed a favorable safety profile and antitumor activity in localized ML. T dose of 1.5 mg/m2 is the recommended dose for the phase 2 study, which is ongoing. FUNDING This study was partially supported by Pharmamar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nadia Hindi
- Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBIS), Spain
- University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Rosa Alvarez
- University Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Gutierrez
- Son Espases University Hospital/IdISBa, Palma, Illes Baleares, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Jesús Romero
- Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlo Morosi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Angelo P. Dei Tos
- Treviso General Hospital, Treviso, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo G. Casali
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBIS), Spain
- University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain
- University Hospital Canarias, Tenerife, Spain
- Center Leon Berard, Lyon, France
- Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute Bergonie – Bourdeaux, France
- University Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
- Son Espases University Hospital/IdISBa, Palma, Illes Baleares, Spain
- Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Treviso General Hospital, Treviso, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Javier Martin-Broto
- Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBIS), Spain
- University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baldini EH, Le Cesne A, Trent JC. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Concurrent Chemoradiation, and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38:910-915. [PMID: 30231383 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_201421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Standard treatment of large intermediate- and high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) typically includes wide excision and radiation therapy. Many patients do well with this approach, but for those with unfavorable features, risk for distant recurrence and, ultimately, mortality can exceed 50%. Unfortunately, universally accepted data elucidating effective treatments to prevent recurrences and improve survival for such high-risk patients are lacking. Accordingly, opinions about the appropriate role of systemic therapy for patients with high-risk localized ESTS vary. This article reviews the current literature pertaining to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk ESTS. All of these approaches are feasible and reasonable to consider. Ultimately, the decision to incorporate chemotherapy into the treatment regimen is best reached by discussion among an experienced multidisciplinary sarcoma team and should be tailored to the individual patient risk profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth H Baldini
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Adult Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Division of Medical Oncology, Sarcoma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Adult Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Division of Medical Oncology, Sarcoma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Jonathan C Trent
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Adult Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Division of Medical Oncology, Sarcoma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sugyo A, Tsuji AB, Sudo H, Koizumi M, Ukai Y, Kurosawa G, Kurosawa Y, Saga T, Higashi T. Efficacy Evaluation of Combination Treatment Using Gemcitabine and Radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-Labeled Fully Human Anti-CD147 Monoclonal Antibody 059-053 in a BxPC-3 Xenograft Mouse Model of Refractory Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19102979. [PMID: 30274301 PMCID: PMC6213240 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19102979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer requires the development of more effective therapy. CD147 expresses in pancreatic cancer with high incidence and has a crucial role in invasion and metastasis. We developed a fully human monoclonal antibody (059-053) with high affinity for CD147. Here we evaluated the efficacy of combined treatment using radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 90Y-labeled 059-053 and gemcitabine in a BxPC-3 xenograft mouse model. Expression of CD147 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) in BxPC-3 tumors was evaluated. In vitro and in vivo properties of 059-053 were evaluated using 111In-labeled 059-053 and a pancreatic cancer model BxPC-3. Tumor volume and body weight were periodically measured in mice receiving gemcitabine, RIT, and both RIT and gemcitabine (one cycle and two cycles). High expression of CD147 and MMP2 was observed in BxPC-3 tumors and suppressed by 059-053 injection. Radiolabeled 059-053 bound specifically to BxPC-3 cells and accumulated highly in BxPC-3 tumors but low in major organs. Combined treatment using RIT with gemcitabine (one cycle) significantly suppressed tumor growth and prolonged survival with tolerable toxicity. The two-cycle regimen had the highest anti-tumor effect, but was not tolerable. Combined treatment with 90Y-labeled 059-053 and gemcitabine is a promising therapeutic option for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aya Sugyo
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST-NIRS), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
| | - Atsushi B Tsuji
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST-NIRS), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
| | - Hitomi Sudo
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST-NIRS), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
| | - Mitsuru Koizumi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Yoshinori Ukai
- Research and Development Division, Perseus Proteomics Inc., 4-7-6 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-0041, Japan.
| | - Gene Kurosawa
- Innovation Center for Advanced Medicine, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
| | - Yoshikazu Kurosawa
- Innovation Center for Advanced Medicine, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
| | - Tsuneo Saga
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST-NIRS), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Tatsuya Higashi
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST-NIRS), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mu R, Yuan Y, Xu J, Mandrekar SJ, Yin J. gBOIN: a unified model-assisted phase I trial design accounting for toxicity grades, and binary or continuous end points. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rongji Mu
- East China Normal University; Shanghai People's Republic of China
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston USA
| | - Ying Yuan
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston USA
| | - Jin Xu
- East China Normal University; Shanghai People's Republic of China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Constantinidou A, Jones RL. Systemic therapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma management. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:87-92. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robin L. Jones
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust; The Institute of Cancer Research; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pasquali S, Gronchi A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas: latest evidence and clinical implications. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2017; 9:415-429. [PMID: 28607580 PMCID: PMC5455882 DOI: 10.1177/1758834017705588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and multifaceted group of solid tumours. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used to limit loss of function after wide surgical excision with the ultimate aim of improving patient survival. Recently, advances in the identification of effective treatment strategies and improvements in patient risk stratification have been reached. A randomized trial demonstrated that neoadjuvant epirubicin and ifosfamide improves survival of patients affected by five high-risk soft tissue sarcoma histologies of trunk and extremities, including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, synovial sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, and leiomyosarcoma. Selection of patients for these treatments is expected to be improved by the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system, as it tailors T-stage categories on primary tumour site and considers a prognostic nomogram for retroperitoneal sarcoma, which also includes soft tissue sarcoma histology and other patient and tumour features not directly included in the TNM staging. Within this framework, this article will present neoadjuvant treatment strategies for high-risk soft tissue sarcoma, emphasizing the most recent advances and discussing the need for further research to improve the effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Pasquali
- Sarcoma Service, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gronchi
- Sarcoma Service, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G Venezian 1, 20013 Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Liposarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma. With its various subtypes, the natural history of this disease can vary significantly from a locally recurrent tumor to a highly malignant one carrying a poor prognosis. Progress in the understanding of the specific molecular abnormalities in liposarcoma provides greater opportunity for new treatment modalities. Although surgical resection and radiation therapy remain the keystones for the management of primary liposarcoma, the inclusion of novel agents that target known abnormalities in advanced liposarcoma enhances the potential for improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadar A Nassif
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach, CA, USA; Orthopedic Research and Education Institute, Sand Canyon Avenue, Irvine, CA, USA; Hoag Orthopedic Institute, Sand Canyon Avenue, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - William Tseng
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Pablo, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Camille Borges
- Orthopedic Research and Education Institute, Sand Canyon Avenue, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Peter Chen
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Burton Eisenberg
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Pablo, Los Angeles, California, USA; USC Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Larrier NA, Czito BG, Kirsch DG. Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Indications and Controversies for Neoadjuvant Therapy, Adjuvant Therapy, Intraoperative Radiation Therapy, and Brachytherapy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2016; 25:841-60. [PMID: 27591502 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2016.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas are rare mesenchymal cancers that pose a treatment challenge. Although small superficial soft tissue sarcomas can be managed by surgery alone, adjuvant radiotherapy in addition to limb-sparing surgery substantially increases local control of extremity sarcomas. Compared with postoperative radiotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy doubles the risk of a wound complication, but decreases the risk for late effects, which are generally irreversible. For retroperitoneal sarcomas, intraoperative radiotherapy can be used to safely escalate the radiation dose to the tumor bed. Patients with newly diagnosed sarcoma should be evaluated before surgery by a multidisciplinary team that includes a radiation oncologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A Larrier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, 450 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, 450 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - David G Kirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, 450 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA; Department of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, 450 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|