Second malignancy risk among pediatric, adolescent, and young adult survivors of fusion-positive and fusion-negative sarcomas: Results from the SEER database, 1992 through 2012

Secondary malignant neoplasms after bone and soft tissue sarcomas in children, adolescents, and young adults

BACKGROUND

Increased survival in young sarcoma patients comes along with a higher incidence of second malignant neoplasms (SMNs). The incidence, latency, histiotype, and outcome of these patients were analyzed because this information is essential to design evidence-based long-term follow-up care programs for young sarcoma survivors.

METHODS

Patients entered on clinical trials or registered in registries with a primary sarcoma in 1 of the cooperative sarcoma study groups in the framework of the Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH) were screened for SMNs. Descriptive analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method, the Gray model, the Fine-Gray model, and the Cox regression model were used for the statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 159 out of 7079 (2.2%) patients were registered with a SMN. Among them, 104 solid SMNs (65%) and 56 hematologic SMNs (35%) occurred. Median latency from first diagnosis of sarcoma to the diagnosis of SMN was 6.8 years (range, 0-26.7 years). Cumulative incidence of SMN was 8.8% after 30 years. Five-year-survival was 67.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.0-68.2) for the 7079 patients and it was 45.1% (95% CI, 36.2-53.6) after the diagnosis of a SMN (subcohort of n = 159 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a remarkable high cumulative incidence of SMNs after bone and soft tissue sarcomas in children, adolescents, and young adults. Therefore, effective transition as well as risk adapted long-term follow-up care programs should be developed and offered to young sarcoma survivors.

LAY SUMMARY

Bone sarcomas and soft tissue tumors are rare tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults. The treatment varies, but may comprise chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiotherapy. Developing a subsequent malignant tumor is a long-term risk for the patients. To better characterize this risk, we analyzed the data of 7079 patients (up to 21 years old) with bone sarcomas or soft tissue tumors. Our findings provide a basis to counsel young sarcoma survivors on their individual risk of subsequent malignant tumors. Moreover, these data can help to establish recommendations for aftercare in young sarcoma survivors.

Mutagenic Consequences of Sublethal Cell Death Signaling

Many human cancers exhibit defects in key DNA damage response elements that can render tumors insensitive to the cell death-promoting properties of DNA-damaging therapies. Using agents that directly induce apoptosis by targeting apoptotic components, rather than relying on DNA damage to indirectly stimulate apoptosis of cancer cells, may overcome classical blocks exploited by cancer cells to evade apoptotic cell death. However, there is increasing evidence that cells surviving sublethal exposure to classical apoptotic signaling may recover with newly acquired genomic changes which may have oncogenic potential, and so could theoretically spur the development of subsequent cancers in cured patients. Encouragingly, cells surviving sublethal necroptotic signaling did not acquire mutations, suggesting that necroptosis-inducing anti-cancer drugs may be less likely to trigger therapy-related cancers. We are yet to develop effective direct inducers of other cell death pathways, and as such, data regarding the consequences of cells surviving sublethal stimulation of those pathways are still emerging. This review details the currently known mutagenic consequences of cells surviving different cell death signaling pathways, with implications for potential oncogenic transformation. Understanding the mechanisms of mutagenesis associated (or not) with various cell death pathways will guide us in the development of future therapeutics to minimize therapy-related side effects associated with DNA damage.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Sarcoma Incidence Are Independent of Census-Tract Socioeconomic Status

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic analyses of sarcoma are limited by the heterogeneity and rarity of the disease. Utilizing population-based surveillance data enabled us to evaluate the contribution of census tract-level socioeconomic status (CT-SES) and race/ethnicity on sarcoma incidence rates.

METHODS

We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to evaluate associations between CT-SES and race/ethnicity on the incidence rates of sarcoma. Incidence rate ratios and 99% confidence intervals were estimated from quasi-Poisson models. All models were stratified by broad age groups (pediatric: <20 years, adult: 20-65 years, older adult: 65+ years) and adjusted for sex, age, and year of diagnosis. Within each age group, we conducted analyses stratified by somatic genome (fusion-positive and fusion-negative sarcomas) and for subtypes with >200 total cases. A P value less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We included 55,415 sarcoma cases in 35 sarcoma subtype-age group combinations. Increasing CT-SES was statistically significantly associated with 11 subtype-age group combinations, primarily in the older age group strata (8 subtypes), whereas malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in adults were associated with decreasing CT-SES. Nearly every sarcoma subtype-age group combination displayed racial/ethnic disparities in incidence that were independent of CT-SES.

CONCLUSIONS

We found race/ethnicity to be more frequently associated with sarcoma incidence than CT-SES. Our findings suggest that genetic variation associated with ancestry may play a stronger role than area-level SES-related factors in the etiology of sarcoma.

IMPACT

These findings provide direction for future etiologic studies of sarcomas.

Patterns of Prior and Subsequent Neoplasms in Children and Adolescents With Soft Tissue Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of prior, concurrent and subsequent neoplasms (SN) represents a serious problem in children and adolescents with soft tissue sarcomas. Pathogenic germline variants contribute to the diagnosis of multiple neoplasms in sarcoma survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 748 children and adolescents, diagnosed with soft tissue sarcomas and registered in trials/registries by the cooperative soft tissue sarcoma (Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studie) group, were reviewed for the occurrence of SNs. Reference histology review was available for all cases; the presence of oncogenic fusions known at the time of diagnosis was confirmed for fusion-positive (F+) entities.

RESULTS

Concurrent or subsequent SNs developed in 13 of 473 survivors of fusion-negative (F-) sarcomas, for an 8-year cumulative SN incidence of 5% in survivors of F- sarcomas. In contrast, only 1 of 278 survivors of F+ sarcoma developed an SN. Twenty of 748 patients with soft tissue sarcomas had a history of prior neoplasms. Six of 14 patients who developed SNs after their index sarcomas met Chompret criteria for Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Nine of 20 patients who had tumors before their index sarcoma diagnosis had neurofibromatosis type 1 or neurofibromatosis type 1 spectrum tumors.

CONCLUSION

Sarcoma phenotype/genotype and the sequence and nature of prior and subsequent neoplasms provide a window into underlying germline genetic susceptibilities in children and adolescents with soft tissue sarcomas.

Survival disparities for second primary malignancies diagnosed among childhood cancer survivors: A population-based assessment

BACKGROUND

Curative therapy places childhood cancer survivors at increased risk for second primary malignancies (SPMs). However, there have been few population-based attempts to characterize differences between outcomes of SPMs in childhood cancer survivors and outcomes of first primary malignancies (FPMs).

METHODS

Clinical and demographic information about childhood cancer survivors who developed SPMs and individuals with comparable FPMs was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with Cox proportional hazards models comparing the overall survival (OS) of individuals with and without a history of childhood cancer. OS was evaluated both overall and for specific cancers diagnosed in 50 or more childhood cancer survivors. Models accounted for potential confounders, including sex, race, age, treatment decade, histology, and disease stage.

RESULTS

Compared with individuals with FPMs (n = 1,332,203), childhood cancer survivors (n = 1409) with an SPM experienced poorer OS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.72-2.02) after the study had accounted for cancer type, age, sex, race, and decade of diagnosis. A history of childhood cancer remained a poor prognostic factor for all specific cancers evaluated, including breast cancer (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.63-2.62), thyroid cancer (HR, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.08-6.19), acute myeloid leukemia (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.87-3.05), brain cancer (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.72-2.55), melanoma (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.55-4.27), bone cancer (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.37-2.57), and soft-tissue sarcoma (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.78-3.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with individuals without a prior cancer diagnosis, survivors of childhood cancer with an SPM experienced inferior outcomes. Survival disparities were observed for the most frequent SPMs diagnosed in childhood cancer survivors.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the oral floor: A case study and literature review of 50 cases of head and neck neoplasm

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) has a relatively poor prognosis, however this neoplasm rarely occurs in the head and neck. To date, no definite protocol has been established for the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck DDLS. The present study reports the case of a 69-year-old male patient with DDLS of the oral floor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of oral floor DDLS. In addition, this is the first reported case with the development of a second primary malignancy following the treatment of head and neck DDLS. A literature review of 50 cases of head and neck DDLS revealed that preoperative biopsy is not reliable for the diagnosis of these tumors and an accurate pathological diagnosis with total resection is preferred.