What is the role of retroperitoneal exploration in optimally debulked stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study

The impact of varying levels of residual disease following cytoreductive surgery on survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Residual disease following cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer has been associated with poorer survival outcomes compared with no residual disease. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of varying levels of residual disease status on survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer who have undergone primary cytoreductive surgery or interval cytoreductive surgery in the setting of new therapies for this disease.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (January 2011 - July 2020) and grey literature, bibliographic and key conference proceedings, were searched for eligible studies. Fixed and random-effects meta-analyses compared progression and survival by residual disease level across studies. Heterogeneity between comparisons was explored via type of surgery, disease stage, and type of adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 2832 database and 16 supplementary search articles screened, 50 studies were selected; most were observational studies. The meta-analysis showed that median progression-free survival and overall survival decreased progressively with increasing residual disease (residual disease categories of 0 cm, > 0-1 cm and > 1 cm). Compared with no residual disease, hazard ratios (HR) for disease progression increased with increasing residual disease category (1.75 [95% confidence interval: 1.42, 2.16] for residual disease > 0-1 cm and 2.14 [1.34, 3.39] for residual disease > 1 cm), and also for reduced survival (HR versus no residual disease, 1.75 [ 1.62, 1.90] for residual disease > 0-1 cm and 2.32 [1.97, 2.72] for residual disease > 1 cm). All comparisons were significant (p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed an association between residual disease and disease progression/reduced survival irrespective of type of surgery, disease stage, or type of adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provided an update on the impact of residual disease following primary or interval cytoreductive surgery, and demonstrated that residual disease was still highly predictive of progression-free survival and overall survival in adults with ovarian cancer despite changes in ovarian cancer therapy over the last decade. Higher numerical categories of residual disease were associated with reduced survival than lower categories.

Correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer after cytoreductive surgery: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

This analysis aimed to better define the relationship between progression-free survival and overall survival in adult patients with ovarian cancer (including fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer) following primary cytoreductive surgery or interval cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was carried out across the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases on 7 July 2020 (date limits 1 January 2011 to 7 July 2020) to identify studies with the following eligibility criteria: clinical trials/observational studies including >200 patients with ovarian cancer aged ≥18 years, evaluating overall survival/progression-free survival following cytoreductive surgery by residual disease status in the United States, Europe, Japan, or China. Weighted linear regression models were used to assess any correlation between median progression-free survival and overall survival, and between logHR for progression-free survival and logHR for overall survival. Risk of bias was assessed for all included studies.

RESULTS

Of the 50 studies reported, 43 were observational studies (41 retrospective and two prospective cohort studies), and seven were reporting for randomized clinical trials-of which four were retrospective data analyses. For analyses of the relationship between overall survival and progression-free survival, 21 studies were eligible. The weighted linear regression model showed a strong positive association between the two survival endpoints. Goodness-of-fit analysis measured the adjusted R2 as 0.84 (p<0.001); a positive association was also observed between logHRs for overall survival and progression-free survival in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Median progression-free survival was predictive of median overall survival. This correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival after primary treatment for ovarian cancer highlights the validity of progression-free survival as a primary endpoint. Observational studies contributed most data, with limited information on disease stage and histology.

The value of systematic lymphadenectomy during debulking surgery in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The therapeutic value of systematic lymphadenectomy during debulking surgery for ovarian cancer remains controversial. We conduct this meta-analysis to evaluate the significance of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients treated with optimal cytoreduction for ovarian cancer.

Method

The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched up to October 2019. Only English-language publications of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the role of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with ovarian cancer were selected for this analysis. For overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated; for complications rate, we calculated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using both the I² and chi-square tests. In cases of I² being larger than 50%, a random-effect model was used, otherwise a fixed-effect model was used.

Results

Four RCTs involving 1607 patients were included in the present analysis. There was no difference in OS between systematic lymphadenectomy and unsystematic lymphadenectomy (HR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.94, 1.07; p = 0.90). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in PFS between these two groups (HR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.87, 1.08; p = 0.62). And postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the systematic lymphadenectomy group (RR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.34, 1.68; p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

Systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer was not associated with longer overall or progression-free survival than unsystematic lymphadenectomy and was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

Comparison of survival outcomes in optimally and maximally cytoreduced stage IIIC ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: Women with only peritoneal tumor burden versus women with both peritoneal and lymphogenous dissemination

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze the survival outcomes of stage IIIC ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) patients with both peritoneal and lymphatic dissemination (IP+/RP+) who had undergone maximal or optimal cytoreduction followed by intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy compared to those women with stage IIIC ovarian HGSC with only peritoneal involvement (IP+/RP-) who were treated similarly.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multicenter study with the participation of five gynecological cancer centers. First, the stage IIIC ovarian HGSC patients were classified into optimally or maximally debulked cohorts. Then, in each cohort, the patients were divided into two groups; the IP+/RP- group included those women with transcoelomic spreading outside the pelvis with no nodal disease, and the IP+/RP+ group included those patients with transcoelomic dissemination outside the pelvis in addition to a positive nodal status. The survival outcomes were compared between the two groups in each cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 405 ovarian HGSC patients were analyzed. In the optimally debulked cohort (n = 257), the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) medians for the IP+/RP- group (n = 69) were 24 and 57 months, respectively, compared to 21 and 58 months, respectively, for the IP+/RP+ group (n = 188) (P = 0.78 and P = 0.40, respectively). In the maximally debulked cohort (n = 148), the PFS and OS medians for the IP+/RP- group (n = 55) were 35 and 63 months, respectively, compared to 25 and 51 months, respectively, for the IP+/RP+ group (n = 93) (P = 0.49 and P = 0.31, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated no survival differences between the IP+/RP- and the IP+/RP+ groups.

Lymphatic Invasion in the Fallopian Tube is a Late Event in the Progression of Pelvic Serous Carcinoma and Correlates With Distant Metastasis

The majority of extrauterine high-grade serous carcinomas are believed to arise in the fallopian tube as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas. The primary mode of metastasis is intraperitoneal, and patients usually present with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Although the tubes have a rich lymphatic network, tubal lymphatic invasion is observed in only a minority of cases. Fallopian tube sections from 222 patients with advanced stage high-grade extrauterine serous carcinoma were reviewed and lymphatic invasion within the lamina propria and myosalpinx were assessed. Seventeen patients were FIGO stage II, 162 stage III, and 43 stage IV. Tubal lymphatic invasion was identified in 44 cases (19.7%). Among the cases with lymphatic invasion, nonfimbrial lamina propria, fimbrial lamina propria, and myosalpingeal lymphatic invasion were present in 23 (52%), 21 (48%), and 21 (48%), respectively. Among cases with lymphatic invasion, 16 (36%) were FIGO stage IV, while among cases without lymphatic invasion, 27 (15%) were stage IV (P=0.0014, χ). In summary, in women with advanced stage high-grade extrauterine serous carcinoma, lymphatic invasion in the fallopian tube is uncommon, and is more than twice as likely to be associated with distant metastases as compared with those without tubal lymphatic invasion.

The efficacy and safety of microwave ablation in patients with retroperitoneal metastases

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal metastases are common, and most present with symptoms; however, treatments for this condition are limited. This retrospective study verified the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) in retroperitoneal metastases patients.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed malignant carcinoma and imaging showing retroperitoneal metastases were enrolled and underwent MWA. The end-points included objective response rate, time to local progression (TTLP), overall survival, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, dose of morphine pre- and post-ablation and complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were enrolled. The mean tumour diameter was 3.6 cm. Altogether, 29 tumour sites in 23 patients were ablated during 23 procedures; technical success was achieved in all 23 patients. The objective response and disease control rates were 95.7% and 100.0%, respectively. The mean TTLP and median OS were 22.8 months (95% CI: 16.1-29.6 months) and 10.6 months (95% CI: 7.4-13.8 months), respectively. In 13 patients with symptoms, the VAS values before ablation and 48 h, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after ablation were 5.38, 2.77 (p = 0.015), 2.15 (p = 0.001), 2.17 (p = 0.001), 1.40 (p = 0.000) and 1.71 (p = 0.006), respectively. The corresponding morphine doses were 76.9 mg, 70.7 mg (p = 0.584), 50.7 mg (p = 0.031), 55.0 mg (p = 0.097), 46.0 mg (p = 0.057) and 40.0 mg (p = 0.363), respectively. No ablation-associated mortality was observed. Major complications, minor complications and adverse events were observed in eight (34.8%), five (21.7%) and four (17.4%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MWA for the treatment of retroperitoneal metastases was effective and the complications were common.