Autologous transplantation versus allogeneic transplantation in patients with follicular lymphoma experiencing early treatment failure

Clinical Practice Recommendations for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies in Follicular Lymphoma: A Collaborative Effort on Behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), accounting for nearly one-third of all NHL. The therapeutic landscape for patients with FL has significantly expanded over the past decade, but the disease continues to be considered incurable. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative in some cases. Recently, the emergence of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FL has yielded impressive response rates and long-term remissions, but definitive statement on the curative potential of CAR-T is currently not possible due to limited patient numbers and relatively short follow up. A consensus on the contemporary role, optimal timing, and sequencing of HCT (autologous or allogeneic) and cellular therapies in FL is needed. As a result, the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines endorsed this effort to formulate consensus recommendations to address this unmet need. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate 15 consensus statements/recommendations. These clinical practice recommendations will help guide clinicians managing patients with FL. Of note, the use of bispecific antibodies in R/R FL was not in the scope of this project.

Age and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio as prognostic factors for autologous transplantation in the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent, lymphoproliferative disease of B-cell origin that has a heterogeneous disease course with varying outcomes. Certain patients may undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. We investigated the outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with FL.

METHODS

Patients who received autologous stem cell transplantation at the University of Debrecen's Department of Hematology between 2004 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after transplantation of patients with FL were examined. Prognostic factors that may influence the course of the disease were chosen.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 49 patients. OS was influenced only by age, whereas PFS was affected by age and the lymphocyte/monocyte ratio. The combination of age and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio defined a patient population with a particularly unfavorable prognostic risk profile: patients over 47 years of age with a pre-transplant lymphocyte/monocyte ratio greater than or equal to 2.675.

CONCLUSION

Age and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio were identified as useful prognostic factors for PFS in patients with FL following autologous stem cell transplantation.

Management and clinical outcomes of follicular lymphoma across continuous lines of treatments: a retrospective analysis in China

Background

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is characterized by an incurable course that frequently necessitates multiple lines of treatment. While a range of new approaches have broadened therapeutic options for patients in later lines, data regarding treatment patterns and outcomes of Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory(R/R) FL was scarcely reported.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study included patients diagnosed with FL grades 1-3a at our institution between January 2002 and December 2019. Endpoints of interest were analyzed according to lines and types of interventions. The endpoints mainly included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

The study enrolled 566 biopsy-proven patients. Among them, 544 patients initiated the first line of treatment, followed by 240 initiating the second line, 146 initiating the third line, 88 initiating the fourth line, 47 initiating the fifth line, and 28 initiating the sixth line. In terms of treatment patterns, anti-CD20 chemotherapy was a major modality in the first and second lines. However, for patients in the third line and subsequent lines, treatment approaches were diverse, and participation in clinical trials for new medications was common, which correlated with a survival benefit. The study also revealed that clinical indicators (such as ORR, PFS, and OS) gradually decreased with each subsequent line of treatment. The ORR at the first line was 86.6%, but decreased to 48.6% at the third line and 40.4% at the sixth line, respectively. Similarly, median OS and PFS decreased to 88.8 and 7.1 months at the third line and further reduced to 21.7 and 2.8 months at the sixth line, respectively. A total of 133 patients developed progression within 24 months from the initiation of first line anti-CD20 chemotherapy (POD24), and these patients exhibited poorer response rates and outcomes in subsequent lines of therapycompared to the non-POD24 group.

Conclusion

This study revealed the clinical routine practices and prognosis of R/R FL patients within the Chinese population. It underscored the unmet need for optimal strategies to improve survival and also served as a benchmark for future trials.

Mosunetuzumab and the emerging role of T-cell-engaging therapy in follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent lymphoma. Since the advent of rituximab, FL has seen a progressive improvement in patient prognosis. While chemotherapy combined with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody remains standard first-line therapy, most patients will relapse and require subsequent therapy. T-cell-redirecting therapies can be very potent and are transforming the therapeutic landscape in the relapsed and refractory (R/R) setting. T-cell-dependent bispecific antibodies, of which mosunetuzumab is the first to be approved for R/R FL, are proving to be a highly effective, 'off-the-shelf' option with manageable toxicities. This review covers approved treatments for R/R FL and focuses on preclinical and clinical data available for mosunetuzumab (Lunsumio™), with the goal of determining its role in the treatment of R/R FL.

Thinking "outside the germinal center": Re-educating T cells to combat follicular lymphoma

There have been significant advancements in the management of follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common indolent lymphoma. These include immunomodulatory agents such as lenalidomide, epigenetic modifiers (tazemetostat), and phosphoinotiside-3 kinase inhibitors (copanlisib). The focus of this review is T cell-engager therapies, namely chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, have recently transformed the treatment landscape of FL. Two CAR T cell products, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and one bispecific antibody, mosunetuzumab, recently received FDA approvals in FL. Several other new immune effector drugs are being evaluated and will expand the treatment armamentarium. This review focuses on CAR T-cell and bispecific antibody therapies, details their safety and efficacy and considers their evolving role in the current treatment landscape of FL.

Efficacy of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation versus Chemotherapy or Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Follicular Lymphoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) versus conventional chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on the survival of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate this, FL and HSCT were used as keywords to search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases.

METHOD

After data extraction and quality evaluation, a total of 13 studies were included, seven of which compared auto-HSCT with conventional chemotherapy and the other six compared allo-HSCT with auto-HSCT to the survival of FL patients.

RESULTS

The results showed that auto-HSCT improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and event-free survival of FL patients compared with conventional chemotherapy without auto-HSCT. Compared with allo-HSCT, the patients receiving auto-HSCT had longer OS and lower non-recurrent mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Auto-HSCT can provide a survival advantage for patients with FL compared with conventional chemotherapy and allo-HSCT did not result in a survival benefit.

Personalised therapy in follicular lymphoma - is the dial turning?

Follicular lymphoma is the most common indolent lymphoma accounting for approximately 20%-25% of all new non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnoses in western countries. Whilst outcomes are mostly favorable, the spectrum of clinical phenotypes includes high-risk groups with significantly inferior outcomes. This review discusses recent updates in risk stratification and treatment approaches from upfront treatment for limited and advanced stage follicular lymphoma to the growing options for relapsed, refractory disease with perspectives on how to approach this from a personalized lens. Notable gaps remain on how one can precisely and prospectively select optimal treatment for patients based on varying risks, with an anticipation that an increased understanding of the biology of these different phenotypes and increasing refinement of imaging- and biomarker-based tools will, in time, allow these gaps to be closed.

Impact of positron emission tomography - computed tomography status on progression-free survival for relapsed follicular lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

The optimum management approach for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma remains uncertain. Autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) is considered a standard option in suitable, younger patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. AutoSCT is associated with very durable remissions in a minority of subjects, but also with significant, well-established toxicities. Although positron emission tomography (PET) status prior to autoSCT is an established prognostic factor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma, no data exist in follicular lymphoma. We describe survival outcomes according to pre-transplant PET status, classified by the Lugano criteria into complete metabolic remission (CMR) versus non-CMR, in 172 patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma within a national, multicenter, retrospective British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy registry study. The median number of lines of therapy prior to SCT was three (range, 1-6). The median follow-up after SCT was 27 months (range, 3-70). The median progression-free survival for all patients after autoSCT was 28 months (interquartile range, 23- 36). There was no interaction between age at transplantation, sex, number of months since last relapse, Karnofsky performance status or comorbidity index and achieving CMR prior to autoSCT. Superior progression-free survival was observed in 115 (67%) patients obtaining CMR versus 57 (33%) non-CMR patients (3-year progression-free survival 50% vs. 22%, P=0.011) and by pre-SCT Deauville score (continuous variable 1-5, hazard ratio [HR]=1.32, P=0.049). PET status was independently associated with progression-free status (non-CMR HR=2.02, P=0.003), overall survival (non-CMR HR=3.08, P=0.010) and risk of relapse (non-CMR HR=1.64, P=0.046) after autoSCT by multivariable analysis. Our data suggest that pre- SCT PET status is of clear prognostic value and may help to improve the selection of patients for autoSCT.

Follicular lymphoma: The long and winding road leading to your cure?

Follicular lymphoma, the most common indolent lymphoma, though highly responsive to therapy is coupled with multiple relapses for the majority of patients. Advances in biologic understanding of molecular events in lymphoma cells and the tumor microenvironment, along with novel cellular and targeted therapies, suggest this may soon change. Here we first review the development of the molecular concepts and classification of follicular lymphoma, along with therapeutic development of treatments based on chemotherapy plus monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20. We then focus on developments over the last decade in further defining follicular lymphoma pathophysiology, leading to targeted therapeutics, as well as novel immunotherapeutic strategies effective against B cell lymphomas including follicular, particularly patients with advanced stage disease. Additional alterations beyond the hallmark t(14;18) translocation are necessary for development of follicular lymphoma. Epigenetic mutations are almost universally identified in follicular lymphoma, most commonly involving histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D (KMT2D, the histone acetyltransferases, cAMP response element-binding protein binding protein (CREBBP) and E1A binding protein P300 (EP300) and the histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2). Mutations are also commonly identified in other proliferation/survival pathways such as B-cell receptor, RAS, mTOR and JAK-STAT pathways, as well as immune escape mutations. The host immune response plays a key role as well, based on studies correlating various immune cell subsets and gene expression signatures with outcomes. Over the last decade, many therapeutic options beyond the commonly used bendamustine-rituximab induction regimen have become available or are being investigated. We focus on these newer agents in the relapsed setting. New antibody-based agents include the naked CD19 directed antibody tafasitamab, the CD79b directed antibody drug conjugate (ADC) polatuzumab vedotin and the CD47 directed antibody magrolimab that targets macrophages rather than FL cells directly. Immune modulation by lenalidomide has moved to earlier lines of therapy and in combinations. Several small molecule inhibitors of proliferation signal pathways involving PI3kinase and BTK have activity against FL. Apoptotic pathway modulators also have activity. With increasing recognition of the high rate of epigenetic mutations in FL, HDAC inhibition has a role. More importantly, the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat is FDA approved for FL after 2 prior lines of therapy. The most exciting data currently involve immune attack against follicular lymphoma by chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART) or bispecific antibody constructs. Given these multiple potentially non-crossreactive mechanisms, studies of rationally designed combination strategies hold the promise of improving outcomes and possibly cure of follicular lymphoma.

CAR T-cell therapy for follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma

Patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have a poor prognosis with anticipated short progression-free and overall survivals. Two CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies are approved in the United States for R/R FL, namely, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel. The results of ZUMA-5 and ELARA studies led to the approval of axi-cel and tisagenlecleucel, respectively, after demonstrating high overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates in this high-risk population of FL patients who had received a median of 3 (range = 2-4) and 4 (range = 2-13) prior lines of therapies, respectively. For instance, the ORR for ZUMA-5 was 94% (CR = 79%), and for ELARA, it was 86% (CR = 69.1%). Pertaining to MCL, brexucabtagene autoleucel is approved for R/R MCL based on results of the ZUMA-2 study. In the latter study, despite the fact that all R/R MCL patients had been exposed to prior Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the reported ORR was 91%, with 68% achieving a CR. These results undoubtedly demonstrate a strong efficacy of CAR T therapy in both R/R FL and MCL; yet, one must acknowledge the relatively short follow-up time of all aforementioned studies. Thus, longer follow-up showing durability of responses and long-term safety is definitely needed.

Divergent paths: management of early relapsed follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the United States and Western Europe. Overall outcomes for patients with FL have continued to improve over the last several decades-most notably, with the addition of the CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab to the treatment armamentarium. More recently, we have seen advances in the management of patients with relapsed/refractory FL with the approval of several new treatments including lenalidomide, axicabtagene ciloleucel, copanlisib, umbralisib, and tazemetostat. Unfortunately, there remains a group of patients for which treatment outcomes, especially overall survival (OS), are suboptimal. This group has been identified as patients who relapse within 24 months (POD24) of completion of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Data indicate that patients who relapse within this window have a 5-year OS of around 50%, compared to 80% for those who remain in remission beyond 24 months. POD24 patients have been included and evaluated in the studies of the novel agents mentioned. While not specifically designed to treat this high-risk group, early data suggest that outcomes are not significantly impacted by this designation, unlike CIT. While to date the optimal management of POD24 patients has not been elucidated, the future appears bright with the continued use of the approved agents and several others in clinical development.

Follicular lymphoma: 2023 update on diagnosis and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally an indolent B cell lymphoproliferative disorder of transformed follicular center B cells. FL is characterized by diffuse lymphadenopathy, bone marrow involvement, and splenomegaly. Extranodal involvement is less common. Cytopenias are relatively common but constitutional symptoms of fever, night sweats, and weight loss are uncommon in the absence of transformation to diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis is based on histology from a biopsy of a lymph node or other affected tissue. Incisional biopsy is preferred over needle biopsies in order to give adequate tissue to assign grade and assess for transformation. Immunohistochemical staining is positive in virtually all cases for cell surface CD19, CD20, CD10, and monoclonal immunoglobulin, as well as cytoplasmic expression of bcl-2 protein. The overwhelming majority of cases have the characteristic t(14;18) translocation involving the IgH/bcl-2 genes.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) uses five independent predictors of inferior survival: age >60 years, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, serum LDH > normal, Ann Arbor stage III/IV, number of involved nodal areas >4. The presence of 0-1, 2, and ≥3 adverse factors defines low, intermediate, and high-risk disease. There are other clinical prognostic models but the FLIPI remains the most common. Other factors such as time to relapse of less than 2 years from chemoimmunotherapy and specific gene mutations may also be useful for prognosis. Regardless of the prognostic model used, modern therapies have demonstrably improved prognosis.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation continues to be appropriate for asymptomatic patients with low bulk disease and no cytopenias. There is no overall survival (OS) advantage for early treatment with either chemotherapy or single-agent rituximab. For patients needing therapy, most patients are treated with chemoimmunotherapy, which has improved overall response rates (ORR), DOR, and OS. Randomized studies have shown additional benefits for maintenance of rituximab. Lenalidomide was non-inferior to chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized front-line study and, when combined with rituximab, was superior to rituximab alone in relapsed FL. Kinase inhibitors, stem cell transplantation (SCT), and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) are also considered for recurrent disease.

Current trends in diagnosis and management of follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) originates from germinal center B cells, is the most prevalent form of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Upfront management is based on stage, grade, and disease burden. Radiotherapy may be curative in limited disease while chemoimmunotherapy is preferred in advanced disease. Maintenance therapy is routinely administered but its role is debatable. Relapses are common and interval from initial therapy to relapse is most important prognostic factor for relapsed FL. Management of relapsed patients is based on the initial management, the interval from prior therapies, and the toxicity of available therapies. Multiple agents are available for patients after two or more lines of therapy, but sequencing remains poorly defined.

Validation of POD24 as a robust early clinical end point of poor survival in FL from 5225 patients on 13 clinical trials

Observational studies and stand-alone trials indicate that patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who experience disease progression within 24 months of front-line chemoimmunotherapy (POD24), have poor outcomes. We performed a pooled analysis of 13 randomized clinical trials of patients with FL in the pre- and postrituximab eras to identify clinical factors that predict POD24. Logistic regression models evaluated the association between clinical factors and POD24. Cox regression evaluated the association between POD24 as a time-dependent factor and subsequent overall survival (OS). A landmark analysis evaluated the association of POD24 with OS for the subset of patients who were alive at 24 months after trial registration. Patients without progression at 24 months at baseline had favorable performance status (PS), limited-stage (I/II) disease, low-risk FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score, normal baseline hemoglobin, and normal baseline β2 microglobulin (B2M) level. In a multivariable logistic regression model, male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.30), PS ≥2 (OR, 1.63), B2M (≥3 mg/L; OR, 1.43), and high-risk FLIPI score (3-5; OR, 3.14) were associated with increased risk of progression before 24 months. In the time-dependent Cox model and the 24-month landmark analysis, POD24 was associated with poor subsequent OS (hazard ratio, 4.85 and 3.06, respectively). This is the largest pooled analysis of clinical trials data validating POD24 as a robust indicator of poor FL survival and identified clinical predictors of early death and progression that can aid in building comprehensive prognostic models incorporating clinical and molecular predictors of POD24.

Early Progressing Follicular Lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Follicular lymphoma is an indolent lymphoma which does not limit life expectancy in most patients; however, approximately 20% of patients will experience progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) of diagnosis and have inferior survival outcomes. To date, no clinical, genetic, or tumor microenvironment prediction models have been able to definitively predict which patients will experience POD24 which limits the ability to alter frontline management of patients suspected to be at high risk of early progression. Here, we review recent literature regarding novel prediction models and management recommendations for POD24 patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have revealed novel clinicopathologic prediction models which may be closer to identifying patients at risk of POD24. In addition, several clinical trials utilizing novel therapies such as tazemetostat, obinutuzumab, PI3K inhibitors, and lenalidomide have been performed which help further guide treatment. Ongoing trials seek to identify the optimal management of these patients, and data from bispecific antibodies and CAR T cell therapies is forthcoming. With ongoing research efforts, hope remains that we are closer to being able to predict which patients will experience early progressing follicular lymphoma and have an improved management plan for those who do in order to improve survival outcomes.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: B-Cell Lymphomas, Version 5.2021

In the last decade, a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas has resulted in the development of novel targeted therapies, such as small molecule inhibitors of select kinases in the B-cell receptor pathway, antibody-drug conjugates, and small molecules that target a variety of proteins (eg, CD-19, EZH2, and XPO-1-mediated nuclear export). Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, first approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, has also emerged as a novel treatment option for R/R follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. These NCCN Guideline Insights highlight the new targeted therapy options included in the NCCN Guidelines for B-Cell Lymphomas for the treatment of R/R disease.

Outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation for transformed follicular lymphoma

This study characterized the outcomes of patients who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL), and clarified the association of low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin use with outcomes after allogeneic HCT. The retrospective study cohort included 74 consecutive patients who underwent autologous (n = 23) or allogeneic (n = 51) HCT at our center from 2000 to 2017. Compared with the allogeneic HCT group, the autologous HCT group underwent fewer systemic regimens before HCT (median 2 vs. 5, p < 0.001) and were more likely to have chemosensitive disease at HCT (100% vs. 82%, p = 0.05), while age, sex and HCT-specific comorbidity index were similar between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 5.8 years among survivors, the 5-year probability of progression-free survival was 64% after autologous HCT and 55% after allogeneic HCT (p = 0.21). The 5-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 0% after autologous HCT and 9.5% after allogeneic HCT (p = 0.062). The 5-year cumulative incidence of disease progression was similar between autologous and allogeneic HCT (36% vs. 36%, respectively, p = 0.88). In the allogeneic HCT group, the use of low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin was associated with a lower incidence of severe acute GVHD but not with an increased risk of mortality or disease progression. More than half of patients with early phase chemosensitive tFL and approximately half of those with advanced-phase tFL achieved long-term progression-free survival with autologous and allogeneic HCT, respectively. Disease progression was the major cause of treatment failure after both types of HCT. Further strategies are needed to reduce the risk of disease progression.

Early Relapse in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of the Clinical Implications and Available Mitigation and Management Strategies

Chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab (R-chemo) or obinutuzumab (G-chemo) is standard of care for patients with previously untreated symptomatic or high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma. Median progression-free survival (PFS) with R-chemo plus R maintenance exceeds 10 years, and G-chemo plus G maintenance improves PFS relative to the corresponding R-containing regimen. Despite these positive results, a sizable proportion of patients continue to progress during or shortly after initial treatment. While no single definition of early relapse has been established, progression of disease within 24 months of initial treatment (POD24) is now widely accepted as a critical adverse prognostic factor. Multiple studies have shown increased mortality risk in patients with POD24 versus those without POD24. Unfortunately, tools for the assessment of POD24 risk are suboptimal, and it is not currently possible in clinical practice to identify individual patients who are at increased risk for early relapse. Treatment strategies for patients with POD24 are not well defined. G-chemo regimens appear to reduce the risk of POD24 relative to R-chemo regimens, although the impact on survival outcomes remains unclear. Beyond standard therapy, autologous stem cell transplant and emerging treatment modalities, such as bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, may have a role in future management. Until standard treatments are defined, mitigating the risk of early relapse with effective up-front treatment remains the priority.

Long-term outcome in patients with follicular lymphoma following high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To contribute data on long-term outcome and potential curative impact of ASCT in FL, especially following HDT with the BEAM protocol (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan), given very limited data on this topic in the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with FL (n = 76) were treated in our institution with HDT and ASCT. In the case of long-term remission (≥8 years), peripheral blood was tested for minimal residual disease by t(14;18)- and IGH-PCR, including the last follow-up.

RESULTS

10-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and freedom from progression (FFP) after first-line ASCT (n = 20) were 80%, 60%, and 69%, after second-line ASCT (n = 48, following BEAM) 66%, 38%, and 41%, after third/fourth-line ASCT (n = 8) 33%, 25%, and 25%, respectively. Prognostic factors for FFP were treatment line and FLIPI (Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index). 10-year FFP for second-line ASCT and low-risk FLIPI at relapse was 69%, intermediate-risk 28%, and high-risk 25% (P < .05). 26 patients developed sustained long-term clinical and molecular remissions of up to 27 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained long-term clinical and molecular complete remissions up to 27 years can be achieved following ASCT (including HDT with BEAM in second treatment line), indicating a potential curative impact of ASCT in FL.

Comparison of Survival Between Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Meta-Analysis

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) versus autologous SCT (auto-SCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Medline, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases through December 31, 2019 were searched. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The secondary outcomes include transplant-related mortality (TRM), event-free survival, relapse/or progression, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). The 18 retrospective studies enrolled 8,058 B-NHL patients (allo-SCT = 1,204; auto-SCT = 6,854). The OS was significantly higher in patients receiving auto-SCT than allo-SCT (pooled odds ratio [OR]: 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29 to 2.22, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was found in PFS (pooled OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.38, P = 0.891). Auto-SCT patients also had lower TRM and NRM (TRM: OR = 0.23, P < 0.001; NRM: OR = 0.16, P < 0.001), but higher relapse or progression rate (OR = 2.37, P < 0.001) than allo-SCT patients. Subgroup analysis performed for different grades and subtypes of B-NHL showed higher OS in auto-SCT patients with high-grade B-NHL and diffused large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). There was, nevertheless, higher PFS in allo-SCT patients with low-grade B-NHL and follicular lymphoma (FL), and lower PFS in allo-SCT patients with DLBCL than their auto-SCT counterparts. In conclusion, the meta-analysis demonstrated that relapsed or refractory B-NHL patients who received auto-SCT have improved OS than those treated with allo-SCT, especially among those with DLBCL, but lower PFS among those with FL. However, the study is limited by a lack of randomized trials, patients’ heterogeneity, and possible selection bias.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant in non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Still an indication?

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) used to play a defined role in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). With the advent of modern targeted molecular therapies and immunotherapies, treatment standards at least for B-cell lymphoma have undergone significant changes, thereby questioning the traditional role of alloHCT in these diseases. This paper attempts to describe the current place and the perspectives of alloHCT in the rapidly evolving treatment landscape of NHL.

The role of axicabtagene ciloleucel as a treatment option for patients with follicular/marginal zone lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) continues to make its way in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. While its prognosis is usually good, the disease is considered incurable and patients still relapse. High-risk subgroups such as high FLIPI score or early relapses (POD24) face poor outcomes. Current treatment options with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (Pi3K) inhibitors or other novel agents have clinical activity but short remission with cures remaining elusive. The ZUMA-5 study of axi-cel has shown high response rates with durable remissions with manageable toxicities, particularly in poor risk FL, replicating the outcomes in smaller and earlier studies. Long-term follow up will demonstrate the real impact of axi-cel in relapsed FL.

Evaluating upfront high-dose consolidation after R-CHOP for follicular lymphoma by clinical and genetic risk models

High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) is an effective salvage treatment for eligible patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and early progression of disease (POD). Since the introduction of rituximab, HDT/ASCT is no longer recommended in first remission. We here explored whether consolidative HDT/ASCT improved survival in defined subgroups of previously untreated patients. We report survival analyses of 431 patients who received frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) for advanced FL, and were randomized to receive consolidative HDT/ASCT. We performed targeted genotyping of 157 diagnostic biopsies, and calculated genotype-based risk scores. HDT/ASCT improved failure-free survival (FFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.8, P = .07; as-treated: HR, 0.7, P = .04), but not overall survival (OS; HR, 1.3, P = .27; as-treated: HR, 1.4, P = .13). High-risk cohorts identified by FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), and the clinicogenetic risk models m7-FLIPI and POD within 24 months-prognostic index (POD24-PI) comprised 27%, 18%, and 22% of patients. HDT/ASCT did not significantly prolong FFS in high-risk patients as defined by FLIPI (HR, 0.9; P = .56), m7-FLIPI (HR, 0.9; P = .91), and POD24-PI (HR, 0.8; P = .60). Similarly, OS was not significantly improved. Finally, we used a machine-learning approach to predict benefit from HDT/ASCT by genotypes. Patients predicted to benefit from HDT/ASCT had longer FFS with HDT/ASCT (HR, 0.4; P = .03), but OS did not reach statistical significance. Thus, consolidative HDT/ASCT after frontline R-CHOP did not improve OS in unselected FL patients and subgroups selected by genotype-based risk models.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplant versus chemo-immunotherapy for early relapse of follicular lymphoma within 2 years of initial therapy

This study compared the quality-adjusted effectiveness and costs of three treatment options for transplant-eligible patients with early progression (POD24) of follicular lymphoma. A Markov decision-analytic model using a 20-year time horizon was used to compare allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT), autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and chemo-immunotherapy (O-CHOP). For second relapse/refractory disease, novel therapy use was modeled, including lenalidomide and rituximab/obinutuzumab, and PI3K inhibitors (PI3Ki). Costs were considered from a Canadian public health payer's perspective. Probabilistic analyses (10,000 simulations) demonstrated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000, ASCT was most cost effective 60% of the time. ASCT resulted in more life years (10.2 vs. alloSCT 9.9 vs. O-CHOP 10.0) and quality-adjusted life years (7.5 vs. alloSCT 6.6 vs. O-CHOP 7.4), with the lowest direct costs ($190,128 CAD). In sensitivity analyses, the model was robust to key variables, including differing probabilities of progression, non-relapse mortality, graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), costs of treating GVHD, costs of PI3Ki, and probability of secondary malignancy from ASCT. However, if patients were older than 65 years or their life expectancy was less than 10 years, chemo-immunotherapy was the preferred strategy. When considering cost, effectiveness, and toxicities, the preferred treatment strategy for most patients with POD24 follicular lymphoma is ASCT.

Current Use of Total Body Irradiation in Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Total body irradiation (TBI) is included in the conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with unique advantages such as uniform distribution over the whole body and decreased exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. For individuals who lack matched sibling or matched unrelated donors, the use of haploidentical donors has been increasing despite challenges such as graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Although a limited number of studies have been performed to assess the clinical role of TBI in haploidentical HSCT, TBI-based conditioning showed comparable results in terms of survival outcomes, rate of relapse, and GVHD in diverse hematologic malignancies such as leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Advances in supportive care, along with recent technical improvements such as restriction of maximum tolerated dose, appropriate fractionation, and organ shielding, help to overcome diverse adverse events related to TBI. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide was used in most studies to reduce the risk of GVHD. Additionally, it was found that post-transplantation rituximab may improve outcomes in TBI-based haploidentical HSCT, especially in patients with B-cell lymphoma. Along with the advances of techniques and strategies, the expansion of age restriction would be another important issue for TBI-based haploidentical HSCT considering the current tendency toward increasing age limitation and lack of matched donors. This review article summarizes the current use and future perspectives of TBI in haploidentical HSCT.

Novel Therapy Approaches to Follicular Lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common form of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is a disease characterised by a long median overall survival and high response rates to currently available chemotherapy and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy combinations. However, for a sub-group of patients the disease behaves aggressively, fails to respond adequately to initial therapy or relapses early. For others, the disease becomes resistant following multiple lines of therapy, and despite recent advances the main cause of death for patients with FL remains their lymphoma. A wide landscape of novel therapies is emerging and the role of individual agents in the FL treatment paradigm is still being established. Some agents, including the cereblon modulator lenalidomide, the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors idelalisib, copanlisib and duvelisib, and the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat have received regulatory approval in the USA or European Union and have entered clinical practice for relapsed FL. Other developments, such as the emergence of immunotherapies including CAR-T cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, are expected to fundamentally change the approach to FL treatment in the future.

Recent advances in cellular therapy for malignant lymphoma

Cellular therapies for malignant lymphoma include autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and adaptive cellular therapy using EBV-specific T cells, cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells, NKT cells, NK cells, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells and chimeric antigen receptor NK (CAR-NK) cells. In this review we discusses recent advances of these cellular therapies and consider ways to optimize these therapies. Not only a single strategy using one of these cellular therapies, but also multi-disciplinary treatment combines with antibodies, such as an anti-tumor antibody and an immune checkpoint antibody, may be more effective for relapsed and refractory lymphoma.

How we treat mature B-cell neoplasms (indolent B-cell lymphomas)

Mature B cell neoplasms, previously indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs), are a heterogeneous group of malignancies sharing similar disease courses and treatment paradigms. Most patients with iNHL have an excellent prognosis, and in many, treatment can be deferred for years. However, some patients will have an accelerated course and may experience transformation into aggressive lymphomas. In this review, we focus on management concepts shared across iNHLs, as well as histology-specific strategies. We address open questions in the field, including the influence of genomics and molecular pathway alterations on treatment decisions. In addition, we review the management of uncommon clinical entities including nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, splenic lymphoma and primary lymphoma of extranodal sites. Finally, we include a perspective on novel targeted therapies, antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Hematopoeitic Cell Transplantation and CAR T-Cell Therapy: Complements or Competitors?

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy are the main modalities of adoptive cellular immunotherapy that have widely permeated the clinical space. The advent of both technologies revolutionized treatment of many hematologic malignancies, both offering the chance at sustained remissions for patients who would otherwise invariably succumb to their diseases. The understanding and exploitation of the nonspecific alloreactivity of allo-HCT and the graft-versus-tumor effect is contrasted by the genetically engineered precision of CAR T therapy. Historically, those with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies have often been considered for allo-HCT, although outcomes vary dramatically and are associated with potential acute and chronic toxicities. Such patients, mainly with B-lymphoid malignancies, may now be offered CAR T therapy. Yet, a lack of prospective data to guide decisions thereafter requires individualized approaches on whether to proceed to allo-HCT or observe. The continued innovations to make CAR T therapy more effective and accessible will continue to alter such approaches, but similar innovations in allo-HCT will likely result in similarly improved clinical outcomes. In this review, we describe the history of the two platforms, dissect the clinical indications emphasizing their intertwining and competitive roles described in trials and practice guidelines, and highlight innovations in which they complement or inform one another.

Stem Cell as Vehicles of Antibody in Treatment of Lymphoma: a Novel and Potential Targeted Therapy

Lymphoma is a heterogeneous malignancy and its incidence is increasing in the past decades all over the world. Although more than half of lymphoma patients achieve complete or partial remission from the standard first-line ABVD or R-CHOP based therapy, patients who fail to respond to these regimens will give rise to relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma and may lead to a worse prognosis. Developing novel agents is important for R/R lymphoma. Based on the homing ability and being genetically modified easily, stem cells are usually used as vehicles in cell-based anti-tumor therapy, which can not only retain their own biological characteristics, but also make anti-tumor agents secrete constantly in tumor environment, to eventually kill the tumor cells more effectively. In this review, we will briefly introduce the properties of antibody therapy carried by stem cells, especially the hopes and hurdles of stem cell-mediated antibody secretion in the treatment of lymphoma.

Precision medicine in follicular lymphoma: Focus on predictive biomarkers

Current care for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) offers most of them long-term survival. Improving it further will require careful patient selection. This review focuses on predictive biomarkers (ie, those whose outcome correlations depend on the treatment strategy) in FL, because awareness of what patient subsets benefit most or least from each therapy will help in this task. The first part of this review aims to summarize what biomarkers are predictive in FL, the magnitude of the effect and the quality of the evidence. We find predictive biomarkers in the setting of (a) indication of active treatment, (b) front-line induction (use of anthracyline-based regimens, CHOP vs bendamustine, addition of rituximab), (c) post-(front-line)induction (rituximab maintenance, radioimmunotherapy), and (d) relapse (hematopoietic stem cell transplant) and targeted agents. The second part of this review discusses the challenges of precision medicine in FL, including (a) cost, (b) clinical relevance considerations, and (c) difficulties over the broad implementation of biomarkers. We then provide our view on what biomarkers may become used in the next few years. We conclude by underscoring the importance of assessing the potential predictiveness of available biomarkers to improve patient care but also that there is a long road ahead before reaching their broad implementation due to remaining scientific, technological, and economic hurdles.

Cellular Therapy in Follicular Lymphoma: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy

A subset of follicular lymphoma patients with high-risk clinical features continues to pose a therapeutic challenge. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a suitable consolidative treatment option for these patients. Data on chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are promising in relapsed/refractory and transformed patients. The increasing armamentarium of nontransplant options coupled with the associated potential long-term sequelae of transplantation raises questions about the placement of transplant strategies in the follicular lymphoma treatment hierarchy.

The impact of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation on the mortality of poor-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an intent-to-transplant analysis

Purpose of this single-centre retrospective study was to assess the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for relapsed/refractory (r/r) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) by intent-to-transplant (ITT). Included were all consecutive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) for whom a donor search was performed between 2004 and 2018. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) measured from search initiation. A donor search was initiated for 189 patients (DLBCL 61, FL 32, MCL 43, and PTCL 53), with 76% of the patients having active disease. OS at 5 years after search initiation for DLBCL, FL, MCL, and PTCL was 26%, 44%, 52%, and 50%, respectively. AlloHCT was performed in 137 patients (72%; DLBCL 64%). Main reason for not undergoing alloHCT was disease progression, whereas donor unavailability accounted for only 4% of pretransplantation failures. These results suggest that survival of patients with r/r NHL entering the alloHCT route may be overestimated by a factor of 1.2-1.4 if based on actually transplanted patients only. This effect should be taken into account when using alloHCT as benchmark for new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of poor-risk NHL.

Early Progression of Follicular Lymphoma: Biology and Treatment

Follicular lymphoma is the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although a majority of patients have a favorable prognosis, a subset of patients experiences early treatment failure. Progression of disease within 24 months of initial chemoimmunotherapy is associated with inferior survival. The biology of early progression is the subject of ongoing study and depends on the unique genetic composition of neoplastic cells and their interaction with a complex tumor microenvironment. Clinicogenetic prognostic indices have been developed to identify high-risk patients. Several have been validated but are limited in identifying those at risk for early treatment failure.

Indications for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Immune Effector Cell Therapy: Guidelines from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) published its first white paper on indications for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in 2015. It was identified at the time that periodic updates of indications would be required to stay abreast with state of the art and emerging indications and therapy. In recent years the field has not only seen an improvement in transplantation technology, thus widening the therapeutic scope of HCT, but additionally a whole new treatment strategy using modified immune effector cells, including chimeric antigen receptor T cells and engineered T-cell receptors, has emerged. The guidelines review committee of the ASTCT deemed it optimal to update the ASTCT recommendations for indications for HCT to include new data and to incorporate indications for immune effector cell therapy (IECT) where appropriate. The guidelines committee established a multiple stakeholder task force consisting of transplant experts, payer representatives, and a patient advocate to provide guidance on indications for HCT and IECT. This article presents the updated recommendations from the ASTCT on indications for HCT and IECT. Indications for HCT/IECT were categorized as (1) Standard of care, where indication is well defined and supported by evidence; (2) Standard of care, clinical evidence available, where large clinical trials and observational studies are not available but have been shown to be effective therapy; (3) Standard of care, rare indication, for rare diseases where demonstrated effectiveness exists but large clinical trials and observational studies are not feasible; (4) Developmental, for diseases where preclinical and/or early-phase clinical studies show HCT/IECT to be a promising treatment option; and (5) Not generally recommended, where available evidence does not support the routine use of HCT/IECT. The ASTCT will continue to periodically review these guidelines and update them as new evidence becomes available.

Follicular lymphoma: 2020 update on diagnosis and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally an indolent B cell lymphoproliferative disorder of transformed follicular center B cells. Follicular lymphoma is characterized by diffuse lymphadenopathy, bone marrow involvement, and splenomegaly. Extranodal involvement is less common. Cytopenias are relatively common but constitutional symptoms of fever, night sweats, and weight loss are uncommon in the absence of transformation to diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis is based on histology from a biopsy of a lymph node or other affected tissue. Incisional biopsy is preferred over needle biopsies in order to give adequate tissue to assign grade and assess for transformation. Immunohistochemical staining is positive in virtually all cases for cell surface CD19, CD20, CD10 and monoclonal immunoglobulin, as well as cytoplasmic expression of bcl-2 protein. The overwhelming majority of cases have the characteristic t(14;18) translocation involving the IgH/bcl-2 genes.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) uses five independent predictors of inferior survival: age > 60 years, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, serum LDH > normal, Ann Arbor stage III/IV, number of involved nodal areas >4. The presence of 0-1, 2, and ≥ 3 adverse factors defines low, intermediate, and high-risk disease. There are other clinical prognostic models but the FLIPI remains the most common. Other factors such as time to relapse of less than 2 years from chemoimmunotherapy and specific gene mutations may also be useful for prognosis. Regardless of the prognostic model used, modern therapies have demonstrably improved prognosis.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation continues to be appropriate for asymptomatic patients with low bulk disease and no cytopenias. There is no overall survival advantage for early treatment with either chemotherapy or single agent rituximab. For patients needing therapy, most patients are treated with chemoimmunotherapy, which has improved response rates, duration of response and overall survival (OS). Randomized studies have shown additional benefit for maintenance rituximab. Lenalidomide was non-inferior to chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized front-line study and, when combined with rituximab, was superior to rituximab alone in relapsed FL. Kinase inhibitors, other immunotherapies, and stem cell transplantation (SCT) are also considered for recurrent disease.

Maintenance Therapies for Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas After Autologous Transplantation: A Consensus Project of ASBMT, CIBMTR, and the Lymphoma Working Party of EBMT

Importance

Maintenance therapies are often considered as a therapeutic strategy in patients with lymphoma following autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) to mitigate the risk of disease relapse. With an evolving therapeutic landscape, where novel drugs are moving earlier in therapy lines, evidence relevant to contemporary practice is increasingly limited. The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT), Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) jointly convened an expert panel with diverse expertise and geographical representation to formulate consensus recommendations regarding the use of maintenance and/or consolidation therapies after auto-HCT in patients with lymphoma.

Observations

The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate consensus statements where at least 75% vote in favor of a recommendation was considered as consensus. The process included 3 online surveys moderated by an independent methodological expert to ensure anonymity and an in-person meeting. The panel recommended restricting the histologic categories covered in this project to Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and follicular lymphoma. On completion of the voting process, the panel generated 22 consensus statements regarding post auto-HCT maintenance and/or consolidation therapies. The grade A recommendations included endorsement of: (1) brentuximab vedotin (BV) maintenance and/or consolidation in BV-naïve high-risk HL, (2) rituximab maintenance in MCL undergoing auto-HCT after first-line therapy, (3) rituximab maintenance in rituximab-naïve FL, and (4) No post auto-HCT maintenance was recommended in DLBCL. The panel also developed consensus statements for important real-world clinical scenarios, where randomized data are lacking to guide clinical practice.

Conclusions and Relevance

In the absence of contemporary evidence-based data, the panel found RAND-modified Delphi methodology effective in providing a rigorous framework for developing consensus recommendations for post auto-HCT maintenance and/or consolidation therapies in lymphoma.

Controversies in the Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma

The overall prognosis of patients with follicular lymphoma has substantially improved over the last decades with a 10-year overall survival of around 80% for the majority of patients. However, for most patients follicular lymphoma it is still a relapsing and remitting disease. Furthermore, certain subsets of patients still have much shorter survival. Currently, there is no established standard how to treat high-risk follicular lymphoma. With advances in the understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of B cell malignancies, a plethora of new compounds have been investigated in FL. These compounds have the potential to increase efficacy if added to current regimens or even replace them. The implementation of these compounds in treatment algorithms is another unsolved issue. This overview highlights major controversies in the treatment of follicular lymphoma and discusses the most recent and relevant clinical trials.

Follicular Lymphoma: Recent and Emerging Therapies, Treatment Strategies, and Remaining Unmet Needs

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a heterogeneous disease with varying prognosis owing to differences in clinical, laboratory, and disease parameters. Although generally considered incurable, prognosis for early- and advanced-stage disease has improved because of therapeutic advances, several of which have resulted from elucidation of the biologic and molecular basis of the disease. The choice of treatment for FL is highly dependent on patient and disease characteristics. Several tools are available for risk stratification, although limitations in their routine clinical use exist. For limited disease, treatment options include radiotherapy, rituximab monotherapy or combination regimens, and surveillance. Treatment of advanced disease is often determined by tumor burden, with surveillance or rituximab considered for low tumor burden and chemoimmunotherapy for high tumor burden disease. Treatment for relapsed or refractory disease is influenced by initial first-line therapy and the duration and quality of the response. Presently, there is no consensus for treatment of patients with early or multiply relapsed disease; however, numerous agents, combination regimens, and transplant options have demonstrated efficacy. Although the number of therapies available to treat FL has increased together with an improved understanding of the underlying biologic basis of disease, the best approach to select the most appropriate treatment strategy for an individual patient at a particular time continues to be elucidated. This review considers prognostication and the evolving treatment landscape of FL, including recent and emergent therapies as well as remaining unmet needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In follicular lymphoma, a personalized approach to management based on disease biology, patient characteristics, and other factors continues to emerge. However, application of current management requires an understanding of the available therapeutic options for first-line treatment and knowledge of current development in therapies for previously untreated and for relapsed or refractory disease. Thus, this work reviews for clinicians the contemporary data in follicular lymphoma, from advances in characterizing disease biology to current treatments and emerging novel therapies.

The Impact of First Complete Remission by PET-CT and Time to Next Treatment on Survival of Follicular Lymphoma Patients

We retrospectively analyzed the impact of initial positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) complete remission (CR) and time to next treatment (TTNT) on patient outcome in follicular lymphoma. Between 2002 and 2014, 150 patients could be evaluated for treatment response and long-term outcome. The CR after first line treatment with either rituximab-cyclophosphamide, oncovin, and prednisolone (R-COP) or rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, oncovin, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) was 89% and partial response (PR) was 7%. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 86.0% and 62.6%, respectively. In five years, 11% of patients had died of lymphoma and 3% from other causes. Forty-seven patients (31%) underwent a second line of treatment comprising 19 (40%) with a TTNT shorter than 24 months and 28 (60%) longer than 24 months. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between R-COP (86%) and R-CHOP (77%) at 5 years, but there were more next treatment events in the R-COP compared with the R-CHOP group on longer follow-up (60% versus 35% at 8 years). For PET-CT response, there was a significant OS difference between initial CR and PR patients (88% versus 70%, p < 0.01), and a longer TTNT was seen in initial CR patients. Patients with a TTNT longer than 24 months had better OS compared with patients with a shorter TTNT (93% versus 54% at 5 years, p < 0.01). In conclusion, patients with initial PET-CT CR and TTNT longer than 24 months had better OS compared with those achieving only PR and shorter TTNT. PET-CT CR should be considered the treatment goal during initial treatment, and more aggressive treatment should be considered for patients with a TTNT of less than 24 months.

How I treat early-relapsing follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most frequently occurring indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with generally favorable outcomes but a variable clinical course. Recent studies have elucidated the consistent and reproducible frequency of early disease progression in FL, occurring in ∼20% of patients. Relapse of FL within 24 months of chemoimmunotherapy (POD24) is now established as a robust marker of poor survival, leading to increased risk of death. Currently, there is no established method of identifying patients at risk for early disease progression at the time of their FL diagnosis. However, numerous studies worldwide are investigating clinical, pathologic, and radiographic biomarkers to help predict POD24, thereby improving subsequent outcomes and adapting therapy based on individual risk. There is also a paucity of standardized treatments for patients with POD24, but investigations are ongoing testing novel targeted therapies and autologous stem cell transplantation strategies. This review provides an overview of early-relapsing FL and our approach to patient management based on recent available data.

Novel immunotherapy approaches to follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) remains a lymphoma subtype that is remarkably sensitive to immunotherapy-based treatment strategies. Anti-CD20 antibody therapy administered as a single agent and in combination as a first-line treatment and at relapse continues to be the most broadly used therapy for this disease. Autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation provide meaningful durable remissions for patients with FL. However, identifying the most suitable patients and the optimal timing for these approaches has become increasingly challenging with the advent of novel therapies. Lenalidomide and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors are emerging as agents that can be applied in the relapsed setting. Other immunotherapy approaches, including checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, appear promising but remain experimental. Utilization of all forms of immunotherapy requires careful consideration of the unique toxicities associated with these agents and the means to mitigate them by selection of appropriate patients, optimal timing, and the use of supportive care.

Advances in Transplantation for Lymphomas Resulting from CIBMTR Lymphoma Working Committee's Research Portfolio: A Five-Year Report (2013-2018)

The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) is a research collaboration between the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)/Be The Match and the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW). The CIBMTR collaborates with the global scientific community to advance hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapy worldwide to increase survival and enrich quality of life for patients. The observation research program within CIBMTR is organized into 15 working committees. This review is aiming to highlight the observational research studies published by the CIBMTR Lymphoma Working committee over the last five years (2013-18) and to summarize how these studies have impacted the field by helping inform clinical practice in scenarios where prospective data from high quality randomized trials were not available or where owing to the rarity of a particular transplant indication such data were unlikely to be generated, outside the setting of a large observational research database. The salient findings reviewed include; (a) studies supporting role of autologous HCT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with sensitive relapse of disease within one year of diagnosis, (b) role of autologous HCT vs allogeneic HCT in follicular lymphoma patients with early therapy failure, (c) prognostic scoring system development for classical Hodgkin lymphoma and DLBCL patients with prior autograft failure, (d) defining the role of alternative donor transplantation in lymphomas, (e) evaluating appropriate conditioning regimens for HCT in lymphoma, and (f) outcomes of HCT in rare lymphoid malignancies.