The efficacy and safety of adding anlotinib in gradual progression on third-generation EGFR-TKIs for EGFR-mutant advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

Acquired resistance is unavoidable with the approval of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for first-line therapy of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some studies have found that combining antiangiogenesis medicines with EGFR-TKI may benefit clinical outcomes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, it is unclear whether EGFR-TKI paired with antiangiogenesis therapy could further improve survival for patients with gradual progression. Thus, we comprised the clinical effectiveness and safety of continuous EGFR-TKI in combination with anlotinib and EGFR-TKI alone in patients who had gradual progression on third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. The comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival(OS) between two groups used the Kaplan-Meier method. Our study comprised 121 eligible patients in total. The objective response rates were 25.0% and 0%, and the disease response rate was 91.7% and 86.9% in the combination group and EGFR-TKIs monotherapy group. The median PFS of combined anlotinib and EGFR-TKI treatment was 6.7 months and the median PFS was 3.6 months in the EGFR-TKI monotherapy group ( P  < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in OS. The common adverse reactions were diarrhea (21.7%), hypertension (21.6%) and proteinuria (20.0%) in the combination group. Seven patients experienced a grade 3 or higher adverse event, no patients discounted the treatment or died due to the toxicity. Our study indicated that, when combined with anlotinib following gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs, it was more efficacious for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients than EGFR-TKI monotherapy. And the toxicity was clinically manageable.

Comparison of osimertinib plus bevacizumab against osimertinib alone in NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Frequent failures observed in some trials comparing the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab to osimertinib monotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations have brought questions.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two treatment regimens in advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations.

Design

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were extensively searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 14 May 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed quality, and extracted data. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and PFS stratified by patients' characteristics. STATA 17.0 software (StataCorp LLC, USA) was adopted for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of four RCTs involving 390 patients were included. Overall, the risk of bias across the studies was moderate to low. Pooled results showed that compared to osimertinib alone, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib failed to show prolongation of PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.27], OS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.73-1.41), or improvement of the ORR (risk ratio = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.90-1.38), while an increased incidence of some AEs was observed, such as nausea, oral mucositis, hypertension, and proteinuria. Notably, combination treatment did significantly prolong the PFS in the subset of smokers (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94). A mild trend toward PFS benefit under the combined regimen was also noted in patients with brain metastases and first-line treatment, though not reaching statistical significance.

Conclusion

Based on the available evidence, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib could not provide additional survival benefits with higher but manageable toxicity for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Osimertinib monotherapy remains the prioritized treatment. Further investigation is warranted.

Low‑dose anlotinib combined with EGFR‑TKI can be used as an alternative for EGFR‑TKI‑resistant non‑small cell lung cancer in elderly patients

The current treatment options for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer in the elderly with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance are limited. Although chemotherapy combined with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) in TKI-resistant patients, it often cannot be tolerated in elderly patients, leading to treatment failure. Anlotinib is a small molecule inhibitor made in China. The application of low-dose anlotinib in elderly patients with TKI-resistant lung cancer deserves further investigation. A total of 48 elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled to evaluate the efficacy of anlotinib combined with continuous EGFR-TKI vs. anlotinib monotherapy in patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. Anlotinib was administered at a dose of 6-8 mg per day, lower than the normal dose and known as a low dose, which is well tolerated in elderly patients. There were 25 cases in the combination group and 23 cases in the anlotinib monotherapy group. The primary endpoint of the present study was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate and toxicity. The median PFS (mPFS) was significantly longer in the combination group than that in the anlotinib monotherapy group: 6.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.35-7.65] compared with 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.38-4.62) (P=0.002). Analysis of the subgroups showed similar trends in results. The median OS was 32 months (95% CI, 22.04-41.96) in the combination group and 28 months (95% CI, 27.13-28.87) in the anlotinib monotherapy group (P=0.217). According to stratification analysis, second-line treatment with anlotinib combined with EGFR-TKI resulted in a better mPFS than third-line treatment (7.5 vs. 3.7 months, HR=3.477; 95% CI, 1.117-10.820; P=0.031). In the combination group, patients with gradual/local progression after EGFR-TKI failure had a longer mPFS than those with dramatic progression (7.5 vs. 6.0 months, HR=5.875; 95% CI, 1.414-10.460; P=0.015). Multivariate analyses showed that continuous EGFR-TKI combined with anlotinib after EGFR-TKI resistance was associated with longer PFS (P=0.019), whereas dramatic progression (P=0.014) had a detrimental effect on follow-up treatment. Grade 2 adverse events (AEs) were reported in four patients (17.39%) in the anlotinib monotherapy group and eight patients (32.00%) in the combination group. Of these, the most common grade 2 AEs were hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, paronychia, mucositis and transaminase elevation. There were no grade 3/4/5 AEs. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that low-dose anlotinib combined with EGFR-TKI is superior to anlotinib alone following EGFR-TKI failure, making it the preferred regimen for elderly patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance.

Natural Cyclophilin A Inhibitors Suppress the Growth of Cancer Stem Cells in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Disrupting Crosstalk between CypA/CD147 and EGFR

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a fatal malignant tumor with a high mortality rate. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) play pivotal roles in tumor initiation and progression, treatment resistance, and NSCLC recurrence. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic targets and anticancer drugs that effectively block CSC growth may improve treatment outcomes in patients with NSCLC. In this study, we evaluated, for the first time, the effects of natural cyclophilin A (CypA) inhibitors, including 23-demethyl 8,13-deoxynargenicin (C9) and cyclosporin A (CsA), on the growth of NSCLC CSCs. C9 and CsA more sensitively inhibited the proliferation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC CSCs than EGFR wild-type NSCLC CSCs. Both compounds suppressed the self-renewal ability of NSCLC CSCs and NSCLC-CSC-derived tumor growth in vivo. Furthermore, C9 and CsA inhibited NSCLC CSC growth by activating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Notably, C9 and CsA reduced the expression levels of major CSC markers, including integrin α6, CD133, CD44, ALDH1A1, Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2, through dual downregulation of the CypA/CD147 axis and EGFR activity in NSCLC CSCs. Our results also show that the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor afatinib inactivated EGFR and decreased the expression levels of CypA and CD147 in NSCLC CSCs, suggesting close crosstalk between the CypA/CD147 and EGFR pathways in regulating NSCLC CSC growth. In addition, combined treatment with afatinib and C9 or CsA more potently inhibited the growth of EGFR-mutant NSCLC CSCs than single-compound treatments. These findings suggest that the natural CypA inhibitors C9 and CsA are potential anticancer agents that suppress the growth of EGFR-mutant NSCLC CSCs, either as monotherapy or in combination with afatinib, by interfering with the crosstalk between CypA/CD147 and EGFR.

Challenges of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC and the potential role of herbs and active compounds: From mechanism to clinical practice

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most common oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are widely used in the treatment of lung cancer, especially in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, and EGFR-TKIs monotherapy has achieved better efficacy and tolerability compared with standard chemotherapy. However, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs and associated adverse events pose a significant obstacle to targeted lung cancer therapy. Therefore, there is an urgent need to seek effective interventions to overcome these limitations. Natural medicines have shown potential therapeutic advantages in reversing acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs and reducing adverse events, bringing new options and directions for EGFR-TKIs combination therapy. In this paper, we systematically demonstrated the resistance mechanism of EGFR-TKIs, the clinical strategy of each generation of EGFR-TKIs in the synergistic treatment of NSCLC, the treatment-related adverse events of EGFR-TKIs, and the potential role of traditional Chinese medicine in overcoming the resistance and adverse reactions of EGFR-TKIs. Herbs and active compounds have the potential to act synergistically through multiple pathways and multiple mechanisms of overall regulation, combined with targeted therapy, and are expected to be an innovative model for NSCLC treatment.

[Research Progress of Angiogenesis Inhibitors Plus EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) have become the standard treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, drug resistance is inevitable in most cases. EGFR-TKI combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is a treatment scheme being explored to delay the therapeutic resistance, which is called "A+T treatment". Several clinical trials have demonstrated that the A+T treatment can improve the progression free survival (PFS) of the NSCLC patients. However, compared to EGFR-TKI monotherapy, the benefits of the A+T treatment based on different EGFR-TKIs, as well as its safety and exploration prospects are still unclear. Therefore, we reviewed the literature related to all three generations EGFR-TKIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors, and summarized the mechanism, benefit, safety, optimal target population of A+T treatment.
.

Optimizing Patient Outcomes Through Sequential EGFR TKI Treatment in Asian Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC

Patients from Asia with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often have mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. While an increasing number of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now available for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, most patients inevitably develop resistance to the treatment. Evidence from clinical studies suggests that treatment outcomes and resistance mechanisms vary depending on the choice of TKI therapy in the first-line setting. Hence, it is important to develop optimal treatment sequencing strategies that can provide maximum survival benefit for the patient. In this review we present clinical evidence in Asian patients with NSCLC for various EGFR TKIs, with the goal of supporting the optimization of treatment sequencing.

Anti-angiogenesis revisited: reshaping the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Although anti-angiogenic agents have been of limited use in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) until recently, further roles for the use of angiogenesis inhibition have emerged in the era of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade. Given the shared common downstream signals of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with their complementary roles in tumorigenesis and tumor angiogenesis, the dual inhibition of EGFR and VEGF pathways represents a rational strategy to maximize clinical efficacy and overcome resistance in the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. VEGF-driven angiogenesis is a potent driver of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), with the recruited immunosuppressive cells driving angiogenesis, highlighting the interplay between the tumor vasculature and the anticancer immunity. Anti-angiogenic therapy can normalize the tumor vasculature and reprogram the TME from immunosuppressive into immunosupportive. Intensive research is under way to utilize the anti-angiogenic combination therapy to its full potential in diverse clinical settings in urgent unmet needs for the treatment of NSCLC. In this review, we present an overview of tumor angiogenesis and summarize the scientific background and preclinical and clinical evidence of anti-angiogenic therapy in combination with target therapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC.

Association of Hypokalemia Incidence and Better Treatment Response in NSCLC Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review on Anti-EGFR Targeted Therapy Clinical Trials

Background

This meta-analysis was designed to explore the relationship between the level of serum potassium and the treatment effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antagonist in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC).

Methods

We searched phase II/III prospective clinical trials on treatment with EGFR antagonists for aNSCLC patients. The objective response rate (ORR) and/or the disease control rate (DCR) and the incidence of hypokalemia of high grade (equal to or greater than grade 3) were summarized from all eligible trials. Heterogeneity, which was evaluated by Cochran’s Q-test and the I² statistics, was used to determine whether a random effects model or a fixed effects model will be used to calculate pooled proportions. Subgroup analysis was performed on different interventions, line types, phases, and drug numbers.

Results

From 666 potentially relevant articles, 36 clinical trials with a total of 9,761 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR was 16.25% (95%CI = 12.45–21.19) when the incidence of hypokalemia was 0%–5%, and it increased to 34.58% (95%CI = 24.09–45.07) when the incidence of hypokalemia was greater than 5%. The pooled DCR were 56.03% (95%CI = 45.03–67.03) and 64.38% (95%CI = 48.60–80.17) when the incidence rates of hypokalemia were 0%–5% and greater than 5%, respectively. The results of the subgroup analysis were consistent with the results of the whole population, except for not first-line treatment, which may have been confounded by malnutrition or poor quality of life in long-term survival.

Conclusion

The efficacy of anti-EGFR targeted therapy was positively associated with the hypokalemia incidence rate. Treatment effects on the different serum potassium strata need to be considered in future clinical trials with targeted therapy.

An elderly advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient harboring rare epidermal growth factor receptor mutations L861R benefited from afatinib: A case report

RATIONALE

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significant efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. No clear evidence exists that EGFR-L861R is sensitive to TKIs, and the best treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR-L861R mutation is undetermined.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report the characteristics, efficacy, and adverse events of a patient harboring rare EGFR mutations L861R treated with afatinib, and summarize the currently available evidence and ongoing clinical trials regarding it.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer that had progressed after previous osimertinib drug therapy, based on the clinical course and imaging findings.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent genetic testing, and next-generation sequencing detected rare EGFR mutations L861R in the plasma (mutation abundance 8.1%). The patient was then administered afatinib at 30 mg quaque die combined with bevacizumab at 300 mg every 2 weeks.

OUTCOMES

After 1 month of treatment, the patient achieved a quick response, and symptoms improved significantly. Repeat evaluation imaging demonstrated that the lesions in the lung and brain were significantly smaller and evaluation showed partial remission. However, despite showing an initial response, the patient presented with behavioral abnormalities, headaches, and sudden confusion after 2 months, and subsequently appeared coma. The family elected to forgo further therapy due to the patient's age and enrolled in hospice care, passing 14 months after the initial diagnosis.

LESSON

EGFR-L861R mutation could help predict the sensitivity of patients with advanced NSCLC to TKIs.

Overall Treatment Strategy for Patients With Metastatic NSCLC With Activating EGFR Mutations

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard of care in the first-line (1L) setting for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations. EGFR-activating mutations are a predictive factor for response to EGFR-TKIs. Meta-analyses have shown that patients with exon 21_L858R mutations exhibit reduced sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs, resulting in inferior patient outcomes compared to those with exon 19 deletion mutations, with worse overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response, and disease control rates. Clinical activity observed with 1L therapy with first-generation (1G), second-generation (2G), and third-generation (3G) EGFR-TKIs is not permanent, and resistance inevitably develops in all cases, supporting the importance of overall treatment planning. The introduction of the 3G EGFR-TKI, osimertinib, provides an opportunity to overcome T790M-mediated resistance to 1G, and 2G EGFR-TKIs. Additionally, with the use of osimertinib, fewer T790M mutations are being detected as T790M is not a reported resistance mechanism to 3G EGFR-TKIs. However, there are currently no approved targeted therapies after 3G EGFR-TKIs. In order to further improve patient outcomes, there is a need to explore additional options for the overall treatment strategy for patients, including 1L and beyond. Combination of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors and EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy and EGFR-TKIs may be a potential therapeutic approach in the 1L setting. This review discusses current treatment options for mNSCLC with activating EGFR mutations based on tumor, patient, and treatment characteristics and how an overall treatment plan may be developed.

Concurrent use of anlotinib overcomes acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Acquired resistance development is a major challenge in the epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR–TKI) treatment of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we investigated the potential effects of the concurrent use of anlotinib and EGFR‐TKI to overcome acquired resistance.

Methods

We conducted a preclinical study to evaluate the antitumor effects of gefitinib + anlotinib in gefitinib‐resistant lung adenocarcinoma models in vitro and in vivo. We then investigated the treatment effect of EGFR–TKI + anlotinib therapy in 24 advanced EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients after EGFR‐TKI acquired resistance between January 2018 and August 2020.

Results

Anlotinib reversed gefitinib resistance in gefitinib‐resistant lung adenocarcinoma models by enhancing the antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of gefitinib. The gefitinib + anlotinib treatment exerted a synergistic antitumor effect by downregulating the activation of VEGFR2 and downstream effectors, Akt and ERK. The EGFR–TKI + anlotinib therapy exhibited an objective response rate of 20.8% and a disease control rate of 95.8%. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 11.53 ± 2.41 months, but median overall survival was not reached. The median PFS was longer in patients experiencing gradual progression (13.30 ± 1.69 months) than in patients with dramatic progression (6.80 ± 1.75 months, p = 0.017). One grade 3 adverse event was noted (diarrhea, n = 2, 8.3%), and grade 4 or 5 adverse events were absent.

Conclusions

EGFR–TKI combined with anlotinib demonstrated powerful antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo. Concurrent use of anlotinib overcomes acquired resistance to EGFR‐TKI in advanced EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients.

Potentiating Therapeutic Effects of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subset of breast cancer with aggressive characteristics and few therapeutic options. The lack of an appropriate therapeutic target is a challenging issue in treating TNBC. Although a high level expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been associated with a poor prognosis among patients with TNBC, targeted anti-EGFR therapies have demonstrated limited efficacy for TNBC treatment in both clinical and preclinical settings. However, with the advantage of a number of clinically approved EGFR inhibitors (EGFRis), combination strategies have been explored as a promising approach to overcome the intrinsic resistance of TNBC to EGFRis. In this review, we analyzed the literature on the combination of EGFRis with other molecularly targeted therapeutics or conventional chemotherapeutics to understand the current knowledge and to provide potential therapeutic options for TNBC treatment.

Optimal sequencing strategies in the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness

Purpose

To summarize current understanding of the efficacy, role, and cost-effectiveness of the available epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and to evaluate sequencing strategies based on the available evidence.

Summary. EGFR TKIs are the current standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Five EGFR TKIs are currently approved in the United States for use in a first-line setting; these TKIs differ in mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and cost. Most patients develop resistance to first-line EGFR TKIs and require subsequent therapy with additional EGFR TKIs, chemotherapy, and/or other targeted agents. A major consideration when selecting EGFR TKIs, both as first-line or subsequent treatment options, is cost-effectiveness. Although clinical trials have shown that the second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs are superior in efficacy to the first-generation agents, pharmacoeconomic studies suggest that the first-generation agents are the most cost-effective, with the second-generation TKI afatinib also considered cost-effective in some studies. Despite its impressive efficacy, osimertinib appears to be less cost-effective due to substantially higher acquisition costs.

Conclusion

Preliminary data suggest that first-line afatinib followed by osimertinib may offer promising survival outcomes and, on the basis of efficacy alone, may represent an optimal sequencing strategy in the majority of patients with EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC, in particular Asian patients and those with Del19-positive tumors. However, considerably more research into outcomes and costs associated with consecutive sequencing of EGFR TKIs is needed before any conclusions can be reached.

Serum microRNA-365 suppresses non-small-cell lung cancer metastasis and invasion in patients with bone metastasis of lung cancer

Objective

In the present investigation, we evaluated the effects of microRNA-365 (miR-365) on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell metastasis and invasion in patients with bone metastasis of lung cancer.

Methods

Blood samples from patients with NSCLC and healthy controls and the A549 adenocarcinoma cell line were included in this study. Quantitative real-time PCR and microarray were performed on blood samples. The MTT assay, luciferase reporter assay, Transwell assay, ELISA, and western blot were performed to evaluate expression of associated factors.

Results

Expression of miR-365 was reduced in patients with bone metastasis of NSCLC. Downregulation of miR-365 promoted cell growth, metastasis, and invasion of NSCLC. Upregulation of miR-365 reduced cell growth, metastasis, and invasion of NSCLC. Downregulation of miR-365 induced expression of NKX homeobox-1 (NKX2-1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), and p-Akt proteins in an in vitro model of NSCLC. Inhibition of NKX2-1 reduced the effects of miR-365 on cell growth, metastasis, and invasion of NSCLC. Activation of EGFR reduced the effects of miR-365 on cell growth, metastasis, and invasion of NSCLC.

Conclusions

The study established that the serum miR-365 suppresses NSCLC cell metastasis and invasion in patients with bone metastasis of lung cancer via EGFR/PI3K through NKX2-1.

Survival analysis for older patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer after progression of first-line gefitinib

AIM

Currently, little studies focus on treatment strategies and survival after progression of gefitinib in older patients with epidermal growth factor receptor )EGFR( mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different treatment modalities on survival after progression of gefitinib in older patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis included 62 consecutively recruited EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients aged over 70 years who failed first-line gefitinib between 2008 and 2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate curves for overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis identified independent prognostic risk factors of OS.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 75 years (range, 70-88 years). The median progression-free survival of gefitinib was 11.0 months. Forty-four (69.4%) patients continued gefitinib beyond progressive disease (PD), and median gefitinib treatment duration was 18.0 months. Only 67.7% patients received anticancer treatments after discontinuation of gefitinib. The median OS was 24.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.7-29.3 months). After failure of gefitinib, the osimertinib only group had significantly improved OS compared with chemotherapy or palliative care only groups (37.5 versus 17.5 and 15.3 months, respectively; P = .017). Multivariate analysis showed that continuous gefitinib after Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor-defined PD (hazards ratio [HR] 0.273, 95% CI: 0.132-0.564, P < .001), osimertinib treatment (HR 0.244, 95% CI: 0.122-0.487, P < .001), and better performance status (HR 0.360, 95% CI: 0.163-0.796, P = .012) were significantly and independently correlated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

For older patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the most important treatment. Survival benefit of chemotherapy after failure of gefitinib seems limited.

Resistance mechanisms of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Differences in the resistance mechanisms of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations are unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the differences in resistance mechanisms after treatment with various epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science on July 29, 2020, for relevant studies on acquired resistance mechanisms against epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The primary outcome measure was differences in the resistance mechanism between individual or generations of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

RESULTS

In total, 33 trials involving 2418 individuals were included and analyzed. T790M was significantly less frequent after afatinib treatment (40.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.7%-48.7%) than after gefitinib and erlotinib treatments (52.5%, 95% CI: 48.7%-56.3%, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between Asian and non-Asian patients in the incidence of T790M after gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib treatments. Regarding epidermal growth factor receptor pathway-independent resistant mechanisms, the incidences of small cell lung cancer transformation (osimertinib: 7.9%, 95% CI: 3.6%-12.2%, others: 2.3%, 95% CI: 0.8%-3.8%) and Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) viral oncogene homolog mutation (osimertinib: 4.6%, 95% CI: 1.5%-7.7%, others: 0.2%, 95% CI: 0.0%-1.7%) were significantly higher following osimertinib treatment than with others.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in the incidence of resistance mechanisms among epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors exist, which should be taken into consideration when choosing the treatment strategy.

Combination therapy with afatinib and bevacizumab in an EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patient with acquired ERBB2 amplification: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Acquired resistance to reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors remains a significant obstacle, and acquired ERBB2 amplification is the most common "bypass" mechanism. For patients with sensitizing EGFR mutation who experience resistance via ERBB2 amplification, no targeted drug has been demonstrated to be effective.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 56-year-old female nonsmoker suffered from left leg paralysis and low back pain. Imaging examination revealed a mass in the anterior segment of the right upper lobe lung and possible multiple metastases in the right hilar, mediastinal lymph nodes, bone metastases, and soft tissue invasion.

DIAGNOSIS

Transbronchial lung biopsy revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (cT4N2M1c, stage IV). An EGFR exon 19 deletion was identified using amplification refractory mutation system.

INTERVENTIONS

After the patient was treated with gefitinib initiation (250 mg/d) for 15 months, the tumor progressed with ERBB2 amplification revealed by next-generation sequencing test. Then, the patient was started on afatinib (40 mg/d) plus bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks).

OUTCOMES

The combination therapy of afatinib and bevacizumab in this patient was effective with some slight side effects. Computed tomography scans showed the tumor shrinkage and the pleural effusion disappeared in the right lung. The overall survival was 23.5 months.

CONCLUSION

To date, there is no targeted therapy approved and demonstrated to be effective for non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR sensitizing mutations, and ERBB2 amplification. The effectiveness of combination therapy with afatinib and bevacizumab may provide a new therapeutic option for these patients.

Efficacy of Afatinib in the Treatment of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Evidence from randomized controlled trials about the efficacy of monotherapy of afatinib on survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) has been not yet rigorously reviewed, which needs to be systemically reviewed and meta-analyzed in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival endpoints. The evidence from randomized controlled trials indicated that first- or second-line afatinib monotherapy has improved the survival of patients with NSCLC. Second-line monotherapy afatinib is well-tolerated and could be a promising monotherapy for recurrent/metastatic HNSCCs; however, further randomized controlled trials should be conducted to collect extra survival data regarding the efficacy of afatinib in R/M HNSCC.

Abstract

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the afatinib efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). This review systemically outlined and meta-analyzed the afatinib efficacy in NSCLC and R/M HNSCC in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) endpoints. Records were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect from 2011 to 2020. Eight afatinib RCTs were included and assessed for the risk of bias. In meta-analysis, overall pooled effect size (ES) of OS in afatinib group (AG) significantly improved in all RCTs and NSCLC-RCTs [hazard ratios (HRs): 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81–0.98, p = 0.02); I² = 0%, p = 0.71/ 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76–0.97; p = 0.02); I² = 0%, p = 0.50, respectively]. ES of PFS in AG significantly improved in all RCTs, NSCLC-RCTs, and HNSCC-RCTs [HRs: 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68–0.83; p < 0.00001); I² = 26%, p = 0.24; 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66–0.84; p < 0.00001); I² = 47%, p = 0.15/0.76 (95% CI: 0.65–88; p = 0.0004); I² = 34%, p = 0.0004, respectively]. From a clinical viewpoint of severity, interstitial lung disease, dyspnea, pneumonia, acute renal failure, and renal injury were rarely incident adverse events in the afatinib group. In conclusion, first- and second-line afatinib monotherapy improved the survival of patients with NSCLC, while second-line afatinib monotherapy could be promising for R/M HNSCC. The prospective protocol is in PROSPERO (ID = CRD42020204547).

Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) combined with bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients with gradual progression on EGFR-TKI treatment: A cohort study

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) significantly improve outcomes of patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, acquired resistance inevitably emerges and remains a major challenge. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients with gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs.Advanced non-squamous EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs were administered bevacizumab while EGFR-TKIs were continued until disease progression occurred. Tumor lesions were assessed, and blood samples were collected at the start of the combination treatment and every 6 weeks until disease progression.Among the 15 included patients, there were no grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs). Partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) were achieved in 1 and 13 patients, respectively, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 6.7% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 93.3%. The median progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), defined as the time from the initiation of combination treatment to disease progression, was 5.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0-6.0) months. Additionally, Spearman correlation analysis revealed that PFS2 was positively correlated with the serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level at baseline (r = 0.7212, P = .0234). Patients with high baseline serum VEGF levels showed a better median PFS2 than those with low baseline serum VEGF levels (5.5 months vs 3.6 months, P = .0333).EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab led to a durable prolongation of PFS in non-squamous NSCLC patients with gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs. This therapeutic regimen was well tolerated and could be a promising strategy for these patients. Serum VEGF could be a potential biomarker to predict a subset of patients who are likely to benefit from EGFR-TKIs combined with bevacizumab.

Phase I study of afatinib plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

Background

Afatinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Combination therapies with first-generation EGFR-TKIs and bevacizumab have been reported to prolong progression-free survival (PFS). However, there are few data on the combination of afatinib and bevacizumab.

Methods

In this phase I trial, we evaluated the safety of afatinib plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. This study consisted of two cohorts. In the dose-finding cohort, enrolled patients were treated with afatinib at a dose of 20, 30, or 40 mg/day (days 1-21) plus bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg (day 1) in 21-day cycles. This cohort was performed according to a 3 + 3 manner. In the expansion cohort, enrolled patients received the recommended dose (RD) based on the results of the dose-finding cohort. The serum trough concentration of afatinib was determined at the steady state.

Results

Seventeen patients were enrolled in this study (6 patients in the dose-finding cohort and 11 patients in the expansion cohort). There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) with afatinib at a dose of 30 mg/day. With afatinib at a dose of 40 mg/day, two of two patients experienced DLTs (grade 3 diarrhea) in cycle 1. With these results, afatinib at a dose of 30 mg/day plus bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg was determined as the RD. Eleven patients in the expansion cohort were treated with the RD. Common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) with the RD were diarrhea (79%), rash (71%), perionychia (64%), and stomatitis (50%). Grade 3 AEs with the RD were diarrhea (7%), perionychia (7%), and hypertension (7%). There were no grade 4/5 AEs or cases of interstitial lung disease. Dose-proportional increases in serum afatinib trough concentrations at steady state were not observed. The response rates (RRs) and disease control rates were 55% and 100% in EGFR-TKI-naïve patients. Re-biopsy was performed in eight patients after progressive disease following the study treatment, and three patients acquired a T790M mutation.

Conclusions

Afatinib at a dose of 30 mg/day plus bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg q3w is well tolerated.

Incorporating radiomic feature of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET improves survival stratification in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To investigate the survival prognostic value of the radiomic features of 18F-FDG PET in patients who had EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutated lung adenocarcinoma and received targeted TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) treatment.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with stage III-IV lung adenocarcinoma and actionable EGFR mutation who received first-line TKI were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT, and we calculated the PET-derived radiomic features. Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the association between the radiomic features and the survival outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A score model was established according to the independent prognostic predictors and we compared this model to the TNM staging system using Harrell's concordance index (c-index).

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (94.1%) experienced disease progression and 41 patients (80.4%) died. Primary tumor SUV entropy > 5.36, and presence of pleural effusion were independently associated with worse OS (both p < 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.001, and 0.003, respectively). We used these two survival predictors to devise a scoring system (score 0-2). Patients with a score of 1 or 2 had a worse survival than those with a score of 0 (HR for OS: 3.6, p = 0.006 for score 1, and HR: 21.8, p < 0.001 for score 2; HR for PFS: 2.2, p = 0.027 for score 1 and HR: 8.8, p < 0.001 for score 2). Our scoring system surpassed the TNM staging system (c-index = 0.691 versus 0.574, p = 0.013 for OS, and c-index = 0.649 versus 0.517, p = 0.004 for PFS).

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study, combining PET radiomics with clinical risk factors may improve survival stratification in stage III-IV lung adenocarcinoma with actionable EFGR mutation. Our proposed scoring system may assist with optimization of individualized treatment strategies in these patients.

Afatinib for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent the standard of care in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The availability of several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for use in the first-line or later settings in NSCLC warrants an in-depth understanding of the pharmacological properties of, and clinical data supporting, these agents. The second-generation, irreversible ErbB-family blocker, afatinib, has been extensively studied in the context of EGFRm+ NSCLC. Results from the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 studies showed that afatinib was more active and better tolerated than chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutations. Subanalysis of these trials, along with real-world data, indicates that afatinib is active in patients with certain uncommon EGFR mutations (S768I/G719X/L861Q) as well as common mutations (Del19/L858R), and in patients with active brain metastases. In LUX-Lung 7, a head-to-head phase IIb trial, afatinib improved progression-free survival and time-to-treatment failure versus the first-generation reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib, albeit with a higher incidence of serious treatment-related adverse events. Nevertheless, afatinib is generally well tolerated, and adverse events are manageable through supportive care and a well-defined tolerability-guided dose adjustment scheme. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of afatinib, discuss treatment sequencing strategies following emergence of different resistance mechanisms, and shed light on the economic impact of afatinib. We also provide a comparison of afatinib with the available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and discuss its position within treatment strategies for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC.

Afatinib + bevacizumab combination therapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with osimertinib resistance: Protocol of an open-label, phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial

Introduction

As most patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop progressive disease after treatment with osimertinib, it is important to develop more effective treatment options. Afatinib has been shown to be more effective in in vitro studies than osimertinib when used in cancer cell lines containing some specific EGFR mutations. Therefore, afatinib may be an effective solution, especially when used in combination with an anti‐VEGF agent such as bevacizumab.

Methods

A phase II multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm trial has been initiated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of afatinib and bevacizumab combination as salvage therapy for EGFR‐mutated lung cancer in patients previously treated with osimertinib. The primary endpoint will be the objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints are progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).

Discussion

A previous study indicated that afatinib inhibits lung cancer cells with specific EGFR mutations more effectively than other EGFR‐TKIs such as osimertinib. Therefore, we expect that combination therapy using afatinib and bevacizumab will be effective in patients previously treated with osimertinib (registration no. jRCTs031190077).

Angiogenesis and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract Several preclinical studies suggested a potential benefit from combined treatment with inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and angiogenesis, both effective in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In pretreated patients with advanced EGFR wild type NSCLC, bevacizumab plus erlotinib improved progression-free survival as second-line therapy in the BeTa study and as maintenance therapy in the ATLAS trial, although the benefit was modest and did not translate into an advantage in overall survival. Disappointing results were reported with oral VEGF inhibitors plus erlotinib in pretreated patients with EGFR wild type NSCLC. On the contrary, erlotinib plus bevacizumab or ramucirumab showed a clinically relevant improvement of progression-free survival in naïve patients with EGFR mutations, leading to the approval of these two regimens as first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutant tumors. Several clinical studies are evaluating the feasibility and activity of osimertinib plus bevacizumab or ramucirumab. However, limits that could affect its use in clinical practice are the need of an intravenous infusion for angiogenesis inhibitors, the increased incidence of treatment associated adverse events, the exclusion of patients with tumors located in central position or at risk of hemorrhage. The identification of predictive biomarkers is an important goal of research to optimize the combined use of these agents. Keywords Lung cancer, angiogenesis, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib, bevacizumab

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Clash of the Generations

The availability of 3 generations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with different pharmacologic characteristics and clinical profiles has provided oncologists with a potentially confusing choice for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Although recent head-to-head clinical trials have demonstrated improved efficacy with second-generation (ie, afatinib, dacomitinib) and third-generation (ie, osimertinib) TKIs compared with the first-generation TKIs (eg, erlotinib, gefitinib), acquired resistance has been inevitable, regardless of which agent has been chosen as first-line therapy. Thus, the potential availability of subsequent treatment options is an important consideration. Recent data have demonstrated that osimertinib confers an overall survival benefit compared with first-generation EGFR TKIs, and dacomitinib has shown an overall survival benefit compared with gefitinib in an exploratory analysis. However, the relative benefits of different sequential EGFR-TKI regimens, especially those involving second- and third-generation agents, have remained uncertain and require prospective evaluation. Few such data currently exist to inform treatment choices. In the present review, we examined the pharmacologic characteristics and current clinical data for EGFR TKIs, including emerging information on the molecular mechanisms of resistance across the different generations of TKIs. Given the uncertainties regarding the optimal treatment choice, we have focused on the factors that might help determine the treatment decisions, such as efficacy and safety in patient subgroups. We also discussed the emerging real-world data, which have provided some insights into the benefits of sequential regimens in everyday clinical practice.

Great efficacy of afatinib on a patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring uncommon EGFR delE709_T710insD mutations: a case report

EGFR)-targeted drugs have been the first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially exon 19 deletions and L858R mutation in exon 21. However, there is insufficient evidence for other less common types of EGFR mutations, such as delE709_T710insD (del 18). Recent studies have revealed that these rare genotypes could be targetable if appropriate mutations, such as delE709_T710insD (del 18). Recent studies have revealed that these rare genotypes could be targetable if appropriate EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are selected. Here we reported a stage Ⅳ NSCLC patient with delE709_T710insD mutation who responded well to afatinib, a second-generation TKI. Afatinib had taken good control of the patient’s brain metastasis with a progression-free survival of 11 months and an overall survival exceeded 21 months, although he had received multi-line therapy. This case demonstrates EGFR delE709_T710insD is a rare but potentially afatinib responsive mutation in NSCLC, which may contribute to changes in clinical practice and further research into the precise detection and treatment of rare mutations in EGFR.

Optimizing outcomes and treatment sequences in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: recent updates

The availability of several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC poses important questions regarding the optimum sequence of therapy. A key consideration is how best to use the third-generation TKI, osimertinib. While osimertinib has demonstrated impressive efficacy and tolerability in a first-line setting, there are currently no standard targeted treatment options following progression. There is an argument, therefore, for reserving osimertinib for second-line use in patients who acquire the T790M resistance mutation after first- or second-generation TKIs. This article reviews recent clinical studies that have assessed the activity of sequential EGFR TKI regimens. These studies support the hypothesis that sequential use of EGFR TKIs represents a viable treatment option in 'real-world' clinical practice.

Second-generation EGFR and ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatments for non-small cell lung cancer

The discovery that mutations in the EGFR gene are present in up to 50% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, and the development of highly efficacious EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has revolutionized the way this common malignancy is treated. Three generations of EGFR TKIs are now approved for use in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); the first-generation agents erlotinib, gefitinib, and icotinib; the second-generation ErbB family blockers afatinib and dacomitinib; and most recently, osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI. The second-generation agents have demonstrated impressive efficacy relative to both standard platinum-based chemotherapy and first-generation EGFR TKIs, significantly improving response and progression-free and overall survival. Data from real-world studies suggest that afatinib is as effective and well tolerated in routine clinical practice as it is in clinical studies and is effective in patients with certain uncommon EGFR mutations, patients with brain metastases, and older patients. Few real-world data are available for dacomitinib in the first-line setting. Afatinib and dacomitinib have similar safety profiles, with acne/skin dryzness, diarrhea, stomatitis, and paronychia the most common adverse events (AEs) reported in clinical and real-world studies. Numerous studies have shown that tolerability-guided dose reductions can help manage afatinib-related AEs without reducing efficacy. As the number of therapeutic options for advanced NSCLC increases, the optimal choice for first-line treatment will be determined by considering patient factors such as the presence of brain metastases, the type of EGFR mutation, tolerability, and subsequent therapy options for long-term treatment.

Ferumoxytol and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide 2395 synergistically enhance antitumor activity of macrophages against NSCLC with EGFRL858R/T790M mutation

Purpose: Drug resistance is a major challenge for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment of lung cancer. Ferumoxytol (FMT) drives macrophage (MΦ) transformation towards a M1-like phenotype and thereby inhibits tumor growth. CpG oligodeoxynucleotide 2395 (CpG), a toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist, is an effective therapeutic agent to induce anticancer immune responses. Herein, the effect of co-administered FMT and CpG on MΦ activation for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was explored.

Methods: The mRNA expression levels of M1-like genes in RAW 264.7 MΦ cells stimulated by FMT, CpG and FMT and CpG (FMT/CpG) were evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Then, the effects of FMT/CpG-pretreated MΦ supernatant on apoptosis and proliferation of H1975 cells were detected by flow cytometry, and the expression of EGFR and its downstream signaling pathway in H1975 cells were explored by western blotting. Finally, a H1975 cell xenograft mouse model was used to study the anti-tumor effect of the combination of FMT and CpG in vivo.

Results: FMT and CpG synergistically enhanced M1-like gene expression in MΦ, including tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-12, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6 and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). FMT/CpG-pretreated MΦ supernatant inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis of H1975 cells, accompanied by down-regulation of cell cycle-associated proteins and up-regulation of apoptosis-related proteins. Further studies indicated that the FMT/CpG-pretreated MΦ supernatant suppressed p-EGFR and its downstream AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway in H1975 cells. Furthermore, FMT/CpG suppressed tumor growth in mice accompanied by a decline in the EGFR-positive tumor cell fraction and increased M1 phenotype macrophage infiltration.

Conclusion: FMT acted synergistically with CpG to activate MΦ for suppressed proliferation and promoted apoptosis of NSCLC cells via EGFR signaling. Thus, combining FMT and CpG is an effective strategy for the treatment of NSCLC with EGFR^L858R/T790M mutation.

Does afatinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy induce positive conversion of T790M in previously-negative patients?

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are markedly effective for T790M-positive patients. To confer their clinical benefit to more patients, a novel therapy to induce positive conversion in T790M-negative patients may be possible. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who had received rebiopsy after completion of ABC-study: a prospective phase II study of Afatinib plus Bevacizumab Combination (ABC)-therapy after acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI. Between October 2014 and September 2016, 32 eligible patients were enrolled in ABC-study at our institutes. Eighteen patients were T790M-negative and 14 were T790M-positive before ABC-therapy. Rebiopsy was performed on 13 T790M-negative and 5 T790M-positive patients after progression of ABC-therapy. In 8 (62%) of 13 T790M-negative patients, T790M status changed from negative to positive after ABC-therapy. Seven of these 8 patients underwent osimertinib therapy. The response rate and median time to treatment failure were 86% and 12.2 months, respectively. There were no adverse events ≥grade 3, nor any treatment-related deaths. On the other hand, T790M remained positive after ABC-therapy in all 5 previous T790M-positive patients. ABC-therapy could induce positive conversion of T790M even in previously-negative patients. We hypothesize that ABC-therapy could provoke “clonal selection”, which purifies T790M-positive cancer cells in heterogeneous tumors. Further studies are warranted to confirm this phenomena.