Hyperprogression with immunotherapy: Is it real?

Case report: Fast disease progression during adjuvant therapy with anti-PD-1 in stage III melanoma patients

Background

Stage III surgically resected melanoma is a disease at high risk of recurrence. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the target therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors significantly changed the outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma and several studies have also shown their benefit in the adjuvant setting for the delay of recurrence in stage III melanoma patients. Hyperprogression disease was observed as a possible adverse response to immunotherapy in the metastatic setting, suggesting that some patients could face additional risk of progression with ICIs, although no consensus was found for the correct definition of this event.

Case presentation

We describe here two cases of rapid multiorgan metastatization during adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III resected melanoma. Even though it would be not accurate to define this syndrome as hyperprogression because of apparent absence of the initial disease in the adjuvant setting, we observed in these two cases the same very rapid progression after first administration of adjuvant ICIs that resulted in death of patients within two months from the starting of treatment. Both patients had NRAS mutated melanoma.

Conclusion

There is an urgent need for a better understanding of the causes of these fatal outcomes and for the identification of biomarkers that would allow to select the patients before offering them an adjuvant treatment, reducing the risk of hyperprogression. From these cases, we suggest that it could be useful a particular attention in proposing ICI adjuvant treatment based on the molecular profile.

Inhibition of hyperprogressive cancer disease induced by immune-checkpoint blockade upon co-treatment with meta-tyrosine and p38 pathway inhibitor

Background

Although immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are overall promissory for cancer treatment, they entail, in some cases, an undesired side-effect called hyperprogressive-cancer disease (HPD) associated with acceleration of tumor growth and shortened survival.

Methods

To understand the mechanisms of HPD we assayed the ICI therapy on two murine tumors widely different regarding immunogenicity and, subsequently, on models of local recurrences and metastases of these tumors. To potentiate the immune response (IR), we combined ICI with meta-tyrosine—that counteracts immune-suppressive signals—and a selective inhibitor of p38 pathway that proved to counteract the phenomenon of tumor-immunostimulation.

Results

ICI were therapeutically effective against both tumor models (proportionally to their immunogenicity) but only when they faced incipient tumors. In contrast, ICI produced acceleration of large and residual tumors. The combined treatment strongly inhibited the growth of large tumors and it managed to cure 80% of mice with local recurrences and 60% of mice bearing residual metastases.

Conclusions

Tumor enhancement was paradoxically correlated to a weak increase of the antitumor IR suggesting that a weak IR – different from a strong tumor-inhibitory one—may produce stimulation of tumor growth, mimicking the HPD observed in some clinical settings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09941-2.

Update of a prognostic survival model in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors using an expansion cohort

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treatment in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) offers new therapeutic venues. We have previously developed a predictive survival model in this patient population based on clinical parameters, and the purpose of this study was to expand the study cohort and internally validate the model.

Methods

A single institutional retrospective analysis of R/M HNSCC patients treated with ICI. Clinical parameters collected included p-16 status, hemoglobin (Hb), albumin (Alb), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet counts. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the impact of patient characteristics and clinical variables on survival. A nomogram was created using the rms package to generate individualized survival prediction.

Results

201 patients were included, 47 females (23%), 154 males (77%). Median age was 61 years (IQR: 55-68). P-16 negative (66%). Median OS was 12 months (95% CI: 9.4, 14.9). Updated OS model included age, sex, absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, albumin, hemoglobin, LDH, and p-16 status. We stratified patients into three risk groups based on this model at the 0.33 and 0.66 quantiles. Median OS in the optimal risk group reached 23.7 months (CI: 18.5, NR), 13.8 months (CI: 11.1, 20.3) in the average risk group, and 2.3 months (CI: 1.7, 4.4) in the high-risk group. Following internal validation, the discriminatory power of the model reached a c-index of 0.72 and calibration slope of 0.79.

Conclusions

Our updated nomogram could assist in the precise selection of patients for which ICI could be beneficial and cost-effective.

Hyperprogression under immunotherapy: a new form of immunotherapy response?-a narrative literature review

OBJECTIVE

Update the last known review, and summarize the definitions, diagnostic criteria, reported risk factors, possible mechanisms and potential biomarkers of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) under immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy is a relatively new systemic therapy adding a new method of treatment of especially advanced cancer patients. In a variety of immunotherapies, however, an unexpected acceleration of tumor growth, known as HPD, is observed in approximately 30% of patients after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. HPD has a deleterious survival effect on patients and represents an urgent issue for both clinicians and patients. Existing literature has reviewed and summarized the definition, diagnostic criteria, reported risk factors and possible mechanisms of hyperprogression. However, with the gradual deepening of the exploration of HPD, researchers have made significant breakthroughs in elucidating the mechanism and mechanism of HPD and exploring biomarkers.

METHODS

The search was conducted on Google Scholar and PubMed in January and May of 2021. We searched among English papers with no limitation on the publication year. We have included retrospective studies, case reports and basic researches related to HPD in the collection, we also referred to some review articles on HPD in recent years. A qualitative-interpretive approach was used for data extraction.

CONCLUSIONS

HPD is considered to be an acceleration of tumor growth after ICI treatment that is not only due to immune infiltration but also due to real disease progression, with an incidence of about 4-30% in all retrospective published studies to date. Currently, the most widely used criteria of HPD contain Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and tumor growth rate (TGR) or tumor growth kinetics. The common risk factors and underlying mechanisms of HPD have not yet been fully elucidated. However, based on the poor prognosis of HPD, there have been many advances in the exploration of biomarkers in recent years, like the prediction of HPD, such as LDH levels of peripheral blood, liquid biopsy, and radiomics, etc.

Emerging avenues in immunotherapy for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

The role of immunotherapy in cancer is now well-established, and therapeutic options such as checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being approved in many cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare orphan disease associated with prior exposure to asbestos, with a dismal prognosis. Evidence from clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitors in this rare disease, suggest that such therapies may play a role as a treatment option for a proportion of patients with this cancer.

MAIN TEXT

While the majority of studies currently focus on the established checkpoint inhibitors (CTLA4 and PD1/PDL1), there are many other potential checkpoints that could also be targeted. In this review I provide a synopsis of current clinical trials of immunotherapies in MPM, explore potential candidate new avenues that may become future targets for immunotherapy and discuss aspects of immunotherapy that may affect the clinical outcomes of such therapies in this cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The current situation regarding checkpoint inhibitors in the management of MPM whilst encouraging, despite impressive durable responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors do not provide a long-term benefit to the majority of patients with cancer. Additional studies are therefore required to further delineate and improve our understanding of both checkpoint inhibitors and the immune system in MPM. Moreover, many new potential checkpoints have yet to be studied for their therapeutic potential in MPM. All these plus the existing checkpoint inhibitors will require the development of new biomarkers for patient stratification, response and also for predicting or monitoring the emergence of resistance to these agents in MPM patients. Other potential therapeutic avenues such CAR-T therapy or treatments like oncolytic viruses or agents that target the interferon pathway designed to recruit more immune cells to the tumor also hold great promise in this hard to treat cancer.

Hyperprogressive disease in advanced cancer patients treated with nivolumab: a case series study

The aim of this retrospective study was to detail the main clinicopathological characteristics of advanced cancer patients exhibiting hyperprogressive disease (HPD) during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab as second- or third-line treatment. A cohort of patients starting second or third-line nivolumab for advanced cancer from 2016 to 2018 was identified from our institution IRB approved and prospectively collected registry. HPD was defined as at least two-fold increase in the tumor growth rate (TGR) during immunotherapy compared to TGR during the preimmunotherapy period. Overall, 47 patients were eligible for this analysis. HPD was observed in three patients (6%) with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, metastatic urothelial transitional carcinoma, and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively. These three patients showed a rapid clinical deterioration and survived less than 3.5 months from immunotherapy onset. Their chief preimmunotherapy characteristics were: age < 75 years, ≥2 metastatic sites, programmed death-ligand 1 < 50%, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. The results of the current study seem to reinforce the hypothesis that in some cases immunotherapy promotes a dramatic increase of TGR and may suggest possible clinical predictors of HPD during nivolumab.

Hyperprogressive disease in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is an unexpected response pattern observed in immune checkpoint therapy and associated with poor prognosis in several cancers. Such patients can't benefit from immunotherapy and even experience a rapid disease progression. At present, many researchers have explored the HPD phenomenon, but there is no consensual definition of HPD in different studies. The incidence of HPD is about 4%-29% in various tumors. Many studies demonstrated that HPD was associated with worse prognosis, but the mechanism of HPD has not yet been fully clarified. Predictive factors in patients with HPD before treatment is one of the keys to managing patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Some factors, such as MDM2/4 amplification, EGFR mutations, and old age may be risk factors for HPD, but the results are discordant in different studies. Performing imaging evaluation and biopsy as early as possible is the main method to avoid the iatrogenic injury of immunotherapy at present.

Identification of an Immune-Related Prognostic Predictor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) is the most prevalent primary cancer of the liver, and immune-related genes (IRGs) regulate its development. So far, there is still no precise biomarker that predicts response to immunotherapy in LIHC. Therefore, this research seeks to identify immunogenic prognostic biomarkers and explore potential predictors for the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies in LIHC. The clinical data and gene expression profiles of patients diagnosed with LIHC were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Moreover, IRGs were obtained from the ImmPort database. We discovered 35 IRGs that were differentially expressed between LIHC tissues and corresponding normal tissues. Through univariate Cox regression analysis, eight prognostic differentially expressed IRGs (PDEIRGs) were identified. Further, three optimal PDEIRGs (BIRC5, LPA, and ROBO1) were identified and used to construct a prognostic risk signature of LIHC patients via multivariate Cox regression analysis. The signature was validated by ROC curves. Subsequently, based on gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) analysis, two out of the three optimal PDEIRGs (BIRC5 and LPA) were significantly enriched in the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. Moreover, the two PDEIRGs (BIRC5 and LPA) were significantly correlated with the expression of genes related to mismatch repair (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2). Furthermore, correlations between the two PDEIRGs (BIRC5 and LPA) and immune checkpoints of cancer treatment (such as CTLA4, PD-1, and PD-L1) were demonstrated. Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a novel pattern of tumor progression which has a close relationship with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) utilization. MDM2 family amplification might promote the HPD phenomenon. Finally, we found a positive regulatory relationship between HPD related gene (MDM2) and BIRC5. Notably, MDM2 can either interact directly with BIRC5 or indirectly via downstream transcription factors of BIRC5. Overall, our study uncovered a novel 3-immune-related prognostic genes in LIHC.

Hyperprogression after first dose of immunotherapy in a patient with radioresistant metastasis from nonsmall cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a new standard of care for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer, improving overall survival compared with standard chemotherapy. However, a new pattern of response to ICIs characterized by accelerated tumor growth has been recently described, termed hyperprogressive disease (HPD). We report the case of a 73-year-old patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who developed HPD following treatment with a unique dose of atezolizumab for a skin metastasis that was refractory to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Potential clinical biomarkers related to HPD to ICIs are reviewed.

A predictive survival model for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with immune check point inhibitors

BACKGROUND

ICIs have expanded treatment options for HNSCC. A minority of the patients respond to these expensive treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a single institutional retrospective review on 121 unresectable or metastatic HNSCC patients treated with ICIs. We predicted that inflammatory markers available through routine blood work, in addition to clinical characteristics may divide patients into groups more or less likely to respond to these agents. Here we develop and internally validate our nomogram to predict survival in patients treated with ICIs.

Hyperprogression After Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment: Characteristics and Hypotheses

Immunotherapies in tumors have attracted increasing attention. They play an important role in precision medicine. Many immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have obtained FDA approval and show good performance in the clinic. Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) after ICIs was first described in November 2016. Since then, a series of cases of HPD after ICIs have been reported. Notwithstanding that only a small subset of patients may experience this atypical response, HPD in affected patients means shorter survival times and worse prognoses. We summarized common standards for HPD diagnosis and profiled advantages and disadvantages. Elderly age, MDM2 family amplification, infiltration of PD-1-positive regulatory effector T cells and M2-like macrophages, and cancer stem cells may take part in HPD occurrence. Overall, we should focus on investigating the early markers and pathogenic mechanisms of HPD to solve this issue in ICIs.

Hyperprogressive NSCLC With Two Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors

Introduction

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are transforming the modern era of cancer therapy. As new treatment options are becoming available, new patterns of disease behavior are manifesting. One such phenomenon, known as hyperprogressive disease (HPD), is a rare complication resulting in exponential disease progression on exposure to an ICI. Herein, we report an uncommon case of a patient who experienced HPD on 2 different occasions with 2 different immunotherapy agents.

Case Presentation

A 77-year-old black man was diagnosed with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. He was enrolled in a clinical trial that involved viral transduction and stereotactic body radiation followed by pembrolizumab administration. His disease progressed markedly after the first cycle of immunotherapy. He was switched to carboplatin and protein-bound paclitaxel. He continued to have steady disease progression. After the third cycle of chemotherapy, he was again given immunotherapy, this time with atezolizumab. Again, after a single infusion, he exhibited substantial disease progression and further clinical deterioration.

Conclusions

HPD is a rare yet disturbing complication of immunotherapy with devastating effects on morbidity and mortality. Although there is accumulating literature supporting the phenomenon of HPD, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of HPD occurring with 2 different ICIs in the same patient. This case suggests that the presence of HPD during treatment with 1 checkpoint inhibitor may preclude the use of another one. It also raises concerns about using other forms of immunomodulating agents. As immunotherapy becomes a major form of cancer therapy, more data are needed to better understand HPD and determine which patients are at risk.

Immunotherapy for mesothelioma: a critical review of current clinical trials and future perspectives

At the clinical level the role of immunotherapy in cancer is currently at a pivotal point. Therapies such as checkpoint inhibitors are being approved at many levels in cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Mesothelioma is a rare orphan disease associated with prior exposure to asbestos, with a dismal prognosis. Various clinical trials for checkpoint inhibitors have been conducted in this rare disease, and suggest that such therapies may play a role as a treatment option for a proportion of patients with this cancer. Most recently approved as a salvage therapy in mesothelioma was granted in Japan, regulatory approval for their use in the clinic elsewhere lags. In this article we review the current pertinent clinical trials of immunotherapies in malignant mesothelioma, discuss the current issues that may affect the clinical outcomes of such therapies and further evaluate potential candidate new avenues that may become future targets for immunotherapy in this cancer.

Atypical patterns of responses in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck cancer

The discovery and implementation into everyday clinical practice of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has marked a therapeutic renaissance in the treatment of advanced solid tumors. In head and neck cancer, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have both been approved for recurrent/metastatic disease based on robust clinical activity observed in landmark phase III clinical trials. Despite tremendous improvements in overall survival, patterns of response and progression to ICIs may be distinct from those traditionally described with classical chemotherapy or molecularly targeted therapies. In this context, pseudoprogression is observed in patients treated with ICIs that show response after a transient increase in tumor burden and hyperprogression is described as rapid radiological or clinical progression after immunotherapy. Most importantly, the assessment of radiological response in patients receiving ICIs needs to be differentiated. In this review, we aim to describe radiologic criteria for immune response evaluation and illustrate the newly reported concepts of atypical patterns of response to ICIs.

Hyperprogression and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Hype or Progress?

There are currently seven approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of various cancers. These drugs are associated with profound, durable responses in a subset of patients with advanced cancers. Unfortunately, in addition to individuals whose tumors show resistance, there is a minority subgroup treated with ICIs who demonstrate a paradoxical acceleration in the rate of growth or their tumors—hyperprogressive disease. Hyperprogressive disease is associated with significantly worse outcomes in these patients. This phenomenon, though still a matter of dispute, has been recognized by multiple groups of investigators across the globe and in diverse types of cancers. There are not yet consensus standardized criteria for defining hyperprogressive disease, but most commonly time to treatment failure less than 2 months and an increase in pace of progression of at least twofold between pre‐immunotherapy and on‐treatment imaging has been used. In some patients, the change in rate of progression can be especially dramatic—up to 35‐ to 40‐fold. MDM2 amplification and EGFR mutations have been suggested as genomic correlates of increased risk of hyperprogression, but these correlates require validation. The underlying mechanism for hyperprogression is not known but warrants urgent investigation.

The phenomenon of hyperprogression, the acceleration of cancer progression after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, is one of particular importance to all stakeholders in immunotherapy. This commentary serves as a call for increased awareness and investigation of these agents and hyperprogression.