Adolescent and young adult cancer survivorship: The new frontier for investigation

Protocol for the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS) for Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with cancer

BACKGROUND

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, defined as individuals aged 15-39 years at initial cancer diagnosis, form a unique population; they face age-specific issues as they transition to adulthood. This paper presents the protocol for the development of a core outcome set (COS) for AYAs with cancer.

METHODS

The methodological standards from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) and the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) for COS development will guide the development of the COS for AYAs with cancer. The project will consist of the following phases: (1) define the scope of the COS; (2) establish the need for a COS in this field (3) assemble an international, multi-stakeholder working group; (4) develop a detailed protocol; (5) determine "what to measure" (i.e., outcomes); (6) determine "how to measure" (i.e., measures); and (7) determine "case-mix" variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of a COS for AYAs with cancer will facilitate the implementation of efficient and relevant standards for data collection, both for clinical trials and in routine healthcare, thereby increasing the usefulness of these data to improve the value of the care given to these underserved young cancer patients.

Loss to follow-up of minorities, adolescents, and young adults on clinical trials: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

The increasing number of childhood cancer survivors necessitates continued follow-up to monitor for long-term complications. Inequities in loss to follow-up for patients enrolled on pediatric clinical trials have not been well studied.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 21,084 patients residing in the United States enrolled on phase 2/3 and phase 3 Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials between January 1, 2000 and March 31, 2021. Rates of loss to follow-up to COG were evaluated using log-rank tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). Demographic characteristics included age at enrollment, race, ethnicity, and zip code level socioeconomic data.

RESULTS

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients 15-39 years old at diagnosis had an increased hazard of loss to follow-up compared to patients 0-14 years old (HR, 1.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-2.02). In the overall cohort, non-Hispanic Blacks were found to have an increased hazard of loss to follow-up compared to non-Hispanic Whites (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.43-1.70). Among AYAs, the highest loss to follow-up rates were among non-Hispanic Blacks (69.8% ± 3.1%), patients on germ cell tumor trials (78.2% ± 9.2%), and patients living in zip codes with a median household income ≤150% of the federal poverty line at diagnosis (66.7% ± 2.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

AYAs, racial and ethnic minority patients, and those living in lower socioeconomic status areas had the highest rates of loss to follow-up among clinical trial participants. Targeted interventions are warranted to ensure equitable follow-up and improved assessment of long-term outcomes.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Little is known about disparities in loss to follow-up for pediatric cancer clinical trial participants. In this study, we found that participants who were adolescents and young adults when treated, those who identified as a racial and/or ethnic minority, or those residing in areas with lower socioeconomic status at diagnosis were associated with higher rates of loss to follow-up. As a result, the ability to assess their long-term survival, treatment-related health conditions, and quality of life is hindered. These findings suggest the need for targeted interventions to improve long-term follow-up among disadvantaged pediatric clinical trial participants.

Adherence and Barriers to Inpatient Physical Therapy Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Hematologic Malignancies

This study described inpatient physical therapy (PT) adherence and barriers to inpatient PT among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with hematologic malignancies receiving care at a Midwestern children's hospital. Forty-seven AYAs receiving care over a 2-year period were included. PT contact was established in 93% of hospitalizations. AYAs declined an average of 34% of PT visits, resulting in PT visits on 27% of hospitalized days, 1 day less than the goal of 3 days a week. The most frequent reasons for decline included: AYA sleeping (22%), AYA undergoing medical procedure (18%), and AYA not feeling well (12%).

Comprehensive Assessment of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Mechanisms of Impaired Medical and Psychosocial Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Protocol of the Prospective Observational COMPRAYA Cohort Study

Simple Summary

Adolescents and young adults (AYA), aged 18–39 years at first cancer diagnosis, are recognized as a distinct population within the oncology community due to the unique challenges they encounter including recognition, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of their disease. It is imperative for advances in the field of AYA oncology to pool data sources (patient-reported outcomes, clinical, treatment, genetic, and biological data) across institutions and countries and create large cohorts that include the full range of AYA ages and diagnoses to be able to address the many pressing questions that remain unanswered in this vulnerable population. The Dutch COMPRAYA study aims to examine the incidence, risk factors, and mechanisms of impaired health outcomes (short- and long-term medical and psychosocial effects) over time among AYA cancer patients. The overarching aim is to provide a research infrastructure for (future) data analyses and observational retrospective/prospective ancillary studies and to expand data collection to other countries.

Abstract

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients suffer from delay in diagnosis, and lack of centralized cancer care, age-adjusted expertise, and follow-up care. This group presents with a unique spectrum of cancers, distinct tumor biology, cancer risk factors, developmental challenges, and treatment regimens that differ from children and older adults. It is imperative for advances in the field of AYA oncology to pool data sources across institutions and create large cohorts to address the many pressing questions that remain unanswered in this vulnerable population. We will create a nationwide infrastructure (COMPRAYA) for research into the incidence, predictive/prognostic markers, and underlying mechanisms of medical and psychosocial outcomes for AYA between 18–39 years diagnosed with cancer. A prospective, observational cohort of (n = 4000), will be established. Patients will be asked to (1) complete patient-reported outcome measures; (2) donate a blood, hair, and stool samples (to obtain biochemical, hormonal, and inflammation parameters, and germline DNA); (3) give consent for use of routinely archived tumor tissue and clinical data extraction from medical records and registries; (4) have a clinic visit to assess vital parameters. Systematic and comprehensive collection of patient and tumor characteristics of AYA will support the development of evidence-based AYA care programs and guidelines.

A randomized controlled trial of a structured exercise intervention after the completion of acute cancer treatment in adolescents and young adults

BACKGROUND

Cancer treatments are frequently associated with impaired physical fitness, quality of life (QOL), and fatigue, often persisting into survivorship.  Studies in older adults with cancer have demonstrated benefits from exercise; however, this has not been rigorously investigated in adolescents and young adults (AYA). The aim of this study was to determine whether a structured 10-week exercise intervention was associated with improved cardiorespiratory fitness (VO_2peak ), fatigue, and QOL in AYA who have recently completed cancer treatment.

METHOD

Forty-three AYA (median age 21 ± 6 years) were randomly assigned to an exercise group (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). The exercise group received a structured 10-week exercise program comprising progressive aerobic and resistance exercise; the control arm received routine care. VO_2peak was measured at baseline, 10 weeks, and six months. Fatigue and QOL were assessed by the FACIT fatigue scale and the PEDS QL, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean VO_2peak at baseline was 26.5 ± 7.2 mL.kg^-1 .min^-1 , which is substantially lower than population norms. The exercise group demonstrated significant improvement in VO_2peak at 10 weeks compared with controls (33.8 ± 8.1 vs 29.6 ± 7.6 mL.kg^-1 .min^-1 , P = 0.0002), but by six months, the difference was no longer significant (32.9 ± 7.0 vs 30.9 ± 11.0 mL.kg^-1 .min^-1 , P = 0.21). There were no significant differences in fatigue or total QOL scores between groups.

CONCLUSION

Cancer treatment is associated with reduced VO_2peak in AYA. Improvement in VO_2peak was accelerated by a 10-week exercise program; however, no significant benefit was observed in QOL or fatigue. The plateau in VO_2peak at six months suggests that a maintenance exercise program may be beneficial.