Gemcitabine and bendamustine is a safe and effective salvage regimen for patients with recurrent/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Results of a phase 1/2 study

Ecofriendly LC-MS/MS and TLC-densitometric methods for simultaneous quantitative assay and monitoring of BEGEV regimen, in vivo pharmacokinetic study application

To date no analytical method has been developed for the determination of the BEGEV regimen and no study has investigated the kinetic interaction between the drugs, to give us priorities for further clinical study, so two rapid, accurate, sensitive and ecofriendly chromatographic methods were developed for the simultaneous determination of bendamustine (BEN), gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VIB) using sildenafil (SIL) as an internal standard (IS) for the purpose of an in vivo pharmacokinetics study in rats. Firstly, the LC-MS/MS method was performed using a mixture of methanol and a 0.1% aqueous solution of formic acid as the mobile phase on a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C₁₈ (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm) column as the stationary phase. BEN, GEM and VIB were ionized by positive ions and detected in the multi-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using precursor → products of m/z 358.20 → 228.25 for BEN, m/z 264.05 → 112.15 for GEM, m/z 779.55 → 122.20 for VIB and m/z 475.00 → 58.35 for SIL. Secondly, TLC-densitometry was applied on TLC silica gel plates using methanol : ethyl acetate (8 : 2, v/v) as the developing system when the separated peaks were scanned at 280 nm. FDA guidelines were followed for validation of the proposed methods, which presented acceptable ranges; then they were applied for an in vivo study in rats with a quantitative determination of each drug after single or combined administration for an investigation of any suspected drug-drug interaction, and all pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for therapeutic drug monitoring of those drugs. Green analytical chemistry principles were considered during all the procedural steps to ensure the greenness and the safety of the methods, which were evaluated using four assessment tools, eco-scale assessment, the national environmental method index (NEMI), the green analytical procedure index (GAPI) and the analytical greenness metric approach (AGREE), and the results were satisfactory.

Novel Agents For Relapsed and Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Review

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is the most common type of HL that occurs mainly in people aged between 15–30 and over 55 years. Although its general prognosis is favorable, 10%–30% of patients with cHL will ultimately develop relapsed or refractory disease (r/r cHL). Improving the cure rate of r/r cHL has proven to be challenging. Some novel agents, such as brentuximab vedotin and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have been used in conventional regimens for patients with r/r cHL in the past decade, have been shown to have good curative effects. This paper reviews the conventional regimens for patients with r/r cHL and focuses on the newest clinical trials and treatment measures to prolong prognosis and reduce adverse events. The evaluation of prognosis plays a vital role in analyzing the risk of relapse or disease progression; thus, finding new predictive strategies may help treat patients with r/r cHL more efficaciously.

High efficacy of BGD (bendamustine, gemcitabine, and dexamethasone) in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

The optimal salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL) has not been defined so far. The goal of this multicenter retrospective study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of BGD (bendamustine, gemcitabine, dexamethasone) as a second or subsequent line of therapy in classical R/R HL. We have evaluated 92 consecutive R/R HL patients treated with BGD. Median age was 34.5 (19-82) years. Fifty-eight patients (63%) had received 2 or more lines of chemotherapy, 32 patients (34.8%) radiotherapy, and 21 patients (22.8%) an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT). Forty-four patients (47.8%) were resistant to first line of chemotherapy. BGD therapy consisted of bendamustine 90 mg/m² on days 1 and 2, gemcitabine 800 mg/m² on days 1 and 4, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4. Median number of BGD cycles was 4 (2-7). The following adverse events ≥ 3 grade were noted: neutropenia (22.8%), thrombocytopenia (20.7%), anemia (15.2%), infections (10.9%), AST/ALT increase (2.2%), and skin rush (1.1%). After BGD therapy, 51 (55.4%) patients achieved complete remission, 23 (25%)-partial response, 7 (7.6%)-stable disease, and 11 (12%) patients experienced progression disease. AutoHCT was conducted in 42 (45.7%) patients after BGD therapy, and allogeneic HCT (alloHCT) in 16 (17.4%) patients. Median progression-free survival was 21 months. BGD is a highly effective, well-tolerated salvage regimen for patients with R/R HL, providing an excellent bridge to auto- or alloHCT.

Phase 1 study of bendamustine in combination with clofarabine, etoposide, and dexamethasone in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

A phase 1 study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of bendamustine when given in combination with clofarabine, etoposide, and dexamethasone daily for 5 days in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

Patients younger than 22 years with second or greater relapsed or refractory acute leukemia or lymphoma after 2 or more prior regimens were eligible. With the rolling 6 design, participants received escalating doses of bendamustine (30, 40, or 60 mg/m² /d) in combination with clofarabine (40 mg/m² ), etoposide (100 mg/m² ), and dexamethasone (8 mg/m² ) daily for 5 days. Optional pharmacokinetic studies were performed in cycle 1 on day 1 and day 5.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were enrolled. Six patients were treated at the dose level of 30 mg/m² /d, 6 were treated at the dose level of 40 mg/m² /d, and 4 were treated at the dose level of 60 mg/m² /d. The dose-limiting toxicity was prolonged myelosuppression. The combination was otherwise well tolerated. The recommended dose of bendamustine in this combination was 30 mg/m² /d for 5 days. Ten responses were observed after 1 cycle: 6 complete remissions, 1 durable minimal residual disease-negative complete remission without platelet recovery in a patient with early T-cell precursor leukemia, and 3 partial remissions. Six patients proceeded to transplantation. The event-free survival rate was 40.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.5%-63.7%) at 1 year and 33.9% (95% CI, 11.9%-55.9%) at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Bendamustine is well tolerated in combination with clofarabine, etoposide, and dexamethasone. The combination administered over 5 days is effective for multiple relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01900509).

LAY SUMMARY

Improvements to the existing chemotherapy regimen are still needed for patients who relapse after targeted therapies and immunotherapies and for those who are not eligible for or have no access to such therapies. A regimen combining cyclophosphamide, clofarabine, and etoposide has been used in relapsed and refractory pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. This study shows that substituting bendamustine for cyclophosphamide in combination with clofarabine and etoposide is safe and effective.

Salvage Therapy for Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Review of Current Regimens and Outcomes

Relapse/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma patients are still a clinical concern. Indeed, despite more effective first-line chemotherapy regimens and better stratification of unresponsive patients by clinical factors and use of early PET, roughly one-third of such patients need salvage chemotherapy and consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy. In this paper, the authors review the different salvage treatments, with special emphasis on newer combinations with brentuximab vedotin or check point inhibitors. The overall response rate is constantly increasing, with a complete remission rate approaching 80%. Functional response evaluation by PET imaging is a strong predictive factor of longer survival, and more sophisticated tools, such as detection of circulating tumour DNA, are emerging to refine the disease-status assessment after treatment. Consolidation by high-dose chemotherapy is still considered the standard of care in chemosensitive patients, leading to a high fraction of patients towards long-term disease control. Maintenance therapy with BV is now approved, reducing disease relapse/progression. An increasing number of Hodgkin lymphoma patients will be cured after first- and second-line therapy, and long-term toxicity needs to be continuously assessed and avoided.

Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Although autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is the standard of care for patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cHL), there is still a significant proportion of patients that relapse after the procedure. This review contemplates different treatment strategies for patients with cHL that relapse or progress after auto-HCT. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has, for many years, been the only curative option for this group of patients. Although the advent of haploidentical donors has allowed for the possibility to allograft almost all patients that are in need of it and to eventually improve historical results, allo-HCT is still associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody drug conjugate that binds to CD30 antigen; BV is able to give up to 34% metabolic complete remissions (mCR) in HL patients that fail auto-HCT. Unleashing the immune system with PD-1 inhibitors has resulted in remarkable responses in a number of malignancies, including HL. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab offer a 20%–25% mCR and 40%–50% partial remissions, with an acceptable safety profile. R/R cHL do have several options nowadays that, without any doubt, have significantly improved the long-term outcome of this hard-to-treat population.