Osteonecrosis of the jaw among patients with cancer treated with denosumab or zoledronic acid: Results of a regulator-mandated cohort postauthorization safety study in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden

Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving zoledronic acid using FAERS and canadian databases

Background

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) stands as a severe complication linked to the use of bisphosphonates, particularly zoledronic acid, which is widely prescribed for managing conditions like osteoporosis and bone metastasis. This study is geared towards the development and validation of a clinical prediction model for ONJ in patients undergoing zoledronic acid treatment.

Methods

We harnessed data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) as our training dataset, while the Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) database served as the testing dataset. The study encompassed patients treated with zoledronic acid and subsequently diagnosed with ONJ. We analysed a range of predictive factors, including breast cancer, bone metastasis, osteoporosis, vitamin D and calcium levels, comorbidities, the number of concomitant medications, dosage, age, weight, and gender. Logistic regression and nomogram analysis were the chosen methodologies for constructing the predictive model. To evaluate the model's performance, we utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The study encompassed a total of 2,126 patients in the training cohort, 911 patients in the internal test cohort from the FAERS database, and 121 patients in the external test cohort from the CVAR database. Notable predictors for ONJ included bone metastasis (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.22-2.24), osteoporosis (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21-0.52), the number of concomitant medications (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05-1.09), and the dosage of zoledronic acid (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.10-1.39). The nomogram exhibited robust discriminatory power, evidenced by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 in the training cohort, 0.76 in the internal test cohort, and 0.90 in the external test cohort. Calibration plots demonstrated a strong alignment between observed and predicted probabilities. Furthermore, DCA highlighted the prediction model's significant net benefit across various threshold probabilities.

Conclusion

By leveraging data from both the FAERS and Canadian databases, this study has successfully developed and validated a clinical prediction model for ONJ in patients receiving zoledronic acid. This model stands as a valuable tool for clinicians, enabling them to pinpoint high-risk patients and make evidence-based treatment decisions to minimize the risk of ONJ.

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and denosumab improves clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer with bone metastases

BACKGROUND

The concomitant use of denosumab and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment may have synergistic effects and enhance antitumor activity; however, this has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with bone metastases receiving combination therapy and to identify the best combination regimen.

METHODS

Eighty-six NSCLC patients with bone metastases who received ICI treatment were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups; a denosumab combination group (D + ICI group; n = 47) and a non-combination group (non-D + ICI group; n = 39). The response rate (RR) for bone metastases, disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), real world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were evaluated. Additionally, the time when denosumab treatment should commence and concomitant treatment duration were evaluated.

RESULTS

The D + ICI group showed significantly better RR (40.4 % vs. 20.5 %, p = 0.01), DCR (67.3 % vs. 38.7 %, p = 0.02), OS (14.2 vs. 8.6 months, p = 0.02), and rwPFS (7.4 vs. 3.6 months, p < 0.01) than the non-D + ICI group; however, incidence of irAEs showed no difference (29.7 % vs. 12.8 %, p = 0.07). Although clinical outcomes did not differ regardless of whether denosumab was initiated before or after ICI treatment, the group that received concomitant denosumab for more than four months had significantly better RR (46.2 % vs. 17.4 %, p = 0.03), OS (20.3 vs. 3.8 months, p < 0.01), and rwPFS (10.9 vs. 2.8 months, p < 0.01) than the group that received concomitant denosumab for less than four months. However, the landmark analysis showed no significant differences in OS (20.4 vs. 12.7 months, p = 0.11) and rwPFS (22.8 vs. 11.2 months, p = 0.21), and the results of denosumab duration were influenced by long-term survivors.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab showed favorable synergistic effects with ICI treatment and may significantly improve the response to bone metastasis and prognosis without increasing the incidence of irAEs.

Cumulative incidence and risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw during long-term prostate cancer management

Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are extensively used in treating patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases. However, this increases the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The safety of long-term BMA administration in clinical practice remains unclear. We aimed to determine the cumulative incidence and risk factors of MRONJ. One hundred and seventy-nine patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases treated with BMA at our institution since 2008 were included in this study. Twenty-seven patients (15%) had MRONJ during the follow-up period (median, 19 months; interquartile range, 9-43 months). The 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year cumulative MRONJ incidence rates were 18%, 27%, and 61%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified denosumab use as a risk factor for MRONJ, compared with zoledronic acid use (HR 4.64, 95% CI 1.93-11.1). Additionally, BMA use at longer than one-month intervals was associated with a lower risk of MRONJ (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.64). Furthermore, six or more bone metastases (HR 3.65, 95% CI 1.13-11.7) and diabetes mellitus (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.68-15.2) were risk factors for stage 2 or more severe MRONJ. MRONJ should be considered during long-term BMA administration in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.

Incidence rate of osteonecrosis of jaw after cancer treated with bisphosphonates and denosumab: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the overall incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) caused by bisphosphonates and denosumab when used for controlling bone cancer metastasis or as adjuvant therapy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and major meetings' proceedings as of July 30, 2022, identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational trials that evaluated ONJ caused by denosumab or bisphosphonates. The total incidence and risk ratio (RR) for ONJ were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 42 003 patients with various solid tumors reported in 23 RCTs were included. The overall ONJ incidence in cancer patients receiving denosumab or bisphosphonates was 2.08% (95% CI 1.37-2.91; p < .01; I2  = 94.99%). Patients receiving denosumab had a higher ONJ incidence than those receiving bisphosphonates (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.10-2.44; p < .05; I2  = 65.4%). Subgroup analyses showed that prostate cancer patients receiving denosumab and receiving zoledronic acid had the highest ONJ incidences, 5.0% and 3.0%, respectively. The incidence of ONJ induced by different doses was also different.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ONJ caused by denosumab and bisphosphonates is low, the dose of the drug and the type of cancer have certain influence on ONJ. Therefore, clinicians should use the drug reasonably to improve the quality of life of patients.

Pre-existing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw before dental extraction

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe adverse event, most commonly associated with dental extractions as a predisposing event. However, it is possible that established MRONJ may be existent before dental extractions and is mistaken for odontogenic disease. The provision of a dental extraction will lead to clinically obvious MRONJ with the cause being attributed to tooth removal. We present a case series of ten patients with pre-existing necrosis of the jaw before dental extraction.Retrospective data were collected on ten patients who presented to the oral surgery department between 2017-2021, diagnosed with pre-existing necrosis. A diagnosis of pre-existing MRONJ was made based on the identification of necrotic bone clinically, either with plain film or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patients with pre-existing necrosis presented with a range of symptoms, including pain, swelling and tooth mobility. Plain film imaging revealed a variety of findings, including periapical radiolucency, periodontal ligament widening and bone loss. CBCT imaging confirmed a necrotic pattern of bone destruction confirming a diagnosis of pre-existing MRONJ.There is increasing evidence to suggest that local inflammation can be a predisposing factor for MRONJ development as opposed to surgical intervention. This case series provides early insight into the presentation of pre-existing MRONJ.

Long-term use of denosumab and its association with skeletal-related events and osteonecrosis of the jaw

Denosumab, an inhibitor of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, reduces skeletal-related events (SREs) and is approved for solid tumors with bone metastases. We studied long-term denosumab efficacy and safety because real-world data is scarce. This single-arm, single-center retrospective study included denosumab-treated breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Kaplan-Meier survival curves assessed exposure, SREs, osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), and death. 132 patients were enrolled. The median denosumab exposure was 28.3 months (range 1.0-84.9). In the first year, 11.1% experienced SREs. This increased to 18.6% in the second, 21% in the third, and 35.1% in the fourth year and beyond. The median time to first on-study SRE has not been reached. 10 denosumab users (7.6%) developed ONJ. ONJ incidence was 0.9% in the first year, 6.2% in the second, 13.6% in the third, and 16.2% in subsequent years. The median time to first on-study ONJ has not been reached yet. Seven patients resumed denosumab after careful management of ONJ. Our data suggest that long-term treatment with denosumab may further prevent or postpone SREs at the cost of an increased risk of ONJ. The majority of patients who resumed denosumab did not experience a recurrence of ONJ.

The Dietary and Non-Dietary Management of Osteoporosis in Adult-Onset Celiac Disease: Current Status and Practical Guidance

Impaired bone mineral density (BMD) is a frequent complication of adult-onset celiac disease (CeD). This is usually due to malabsorption of nutrients, changes in bone metabolism in association with inflammation, and to a lesser extent, decreased overall physical health and mobility. This review aims to highlight the current status concerning surveillance, prevention, and treatment strategies for bone disease in CeD. A practical guidance on these matters is suggested. The available published research on the prevention and treatment of decreased BMD in relation to CeD is scarce. In general, publications were based on expert opinions or extrapolation from studies on postmenopausal women or inflammatory bowel disease. Optimal dietary treatment and an adequate supply of calcium and vitamin D are the cornerstones for the reduction in fracture risk in patients with CeD. In adults with low BMD or fragility fractures, CeD needs to be considered and specifically approached. When osteoporosis is documented, start treatment with an antiresorptive agent; these agents are proven to result in a long-term reduction in fracture risk in high-risk individuals. However, there are some important differences between the management of male and female patients, particularly premenopausal women, that need to be addressed. In patients with persisting diarrhea and malabsorption, parenteral medications may be preferable. Future research specifically focusing on celiac disease and the associated disorders in bone mineralization is mandatory to provide evidence-based recommendations in this field.

Real-world study of antiresorptive-related osteonecrosis of jaw based on the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system database

Objective: This study aims to explore the risk signals of osteonecrosis of the jaw induced by antiresorptive drugs and provide references for the clinical safety application. Method: According to the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), from January 2004 to September 2021, we chose "Osteonecrosis of the jaw (10064658)" and "Exposed bone in jaw (10071014)" as preferred terms, "antiresorptive drugs" as the target drugs, and primary suspect drug as the drug role code in the dataset. We evaluated the association between drugs and adverse events by using reporting odds ratio (ROR) based on disproportionality analysis. We took the High-Level Terms (HLT) of MedDRA® as the classification level of indications to calculate ROR to compare the signal difference of ONJ in different indications. In addition, patients with antiresorptive-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw and the time of onset of the condition following different antiresorptive medications were collected for the study. Results: The FAERS contained 18,421 reports relating to jaw osteonecrosis from January 2004 to September 2021. A total of eight antiresorptive agents were included in the analysis. From high to low, the ROR of ONJ induced by antiresorptive agents (regardless of indication) is pamidronate (ROR = 494.8), zoledronic acid (ROR = 431.9), denosumab (ROR = 194.8), alendronate (ROR = 151.2), risedronate (ROR = 140.2), etidronic acid (ROR = 64.5), ibandronate (ROR = 40.8), and romosozumab (ROR = 6.4). HLT ROR values for "metabolic bone disorders" were the lowest for each drug, while HLT ROR values were high for "tumor-related indications," including breast and nipple neoplasms malignant, plasma cell myelomas, and prostatic neoplasms malignant. The onset time for osteonecrosis of the jaw as median (Q1, Q3), osteoporosis-related indications, and the onset time for ONJ were 730 (368, 1268), 489.5 (236.3, 909.8), 722.5 (314, 1055), 761 (368, 1720), and 153 (50, 346) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, ibandronate, risedronate, and romosozumab, respectively. Cancer-related indications: the onset time for ONJ were 680.5 (255.3, 1283), 488 (245, 851), and 696.5 (347, 1087) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, and pamidronate, respectively. Conclusion: When antiresorptive drugs are used for metastasis, they have the largest risk signal, followed by malignancy, and the smallest is osteoporosis. The onset time of ONJ may not be related to the indications. The onset time of ONJ for BPs was about 2 years, denosumab about 1.3 years, and romosozumab less than 1 year, which may be related to sequential treatment. When used according to the instructions, the risk of ONJ caused by denosumab was higher than that of zoledronic acid, regardless of the indication. Based on these findings, researchers will continue to monitor and identify risk factors.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw in primary dental care: Recognition and referral

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) are uncommon conditions, however when present they have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life and are notoriously difficult to treat. With medical advances resulting in improved survival rates and increased life expectancy, it is likely that general dental practitioners (GDPs) will more frequently be involved in the oral health management of patients at risk of both ORN and MRONJ. Though management of both diseases is beyond the scope of primary care dentistry, the GDP still has a key role in the patient's overall care. It is therefore important to have a good understanding of these conditions and their consequences for dental treatment in order to provide adequate patient support. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach to treatment and as part of this GDPs are integral in prevention, early recognition and maintenance of oral health following diagnosis. This article aims to refresh the reader's knowledge regarding MRONJ and ORN and support the GDP in managing this patient group.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Caused by Denosumab in Treatment-Naïve and Pre-Treatment with Zoledronic Acid Groups: A Time-to-Onset Study Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database

BACKGROUND

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw is a serious adverse event associated with bone-modifying agents, such as injectable bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid) and the anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand antibody (denosumab).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate and compare the time-to-onset profile for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with denosumab between treatment-naïve (naïve group) and pre-treatment with zoledronic acid (post-zoledronic acid group) patients using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

METHODS

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw was defined according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. The medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw onset profiles were evaluated using the Weibull shape parameter and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database contains 632,409 reports published between April 2004 and March 2020. In the time-to-onset analysis, after extracting the combinations with complete information for the treatment start date and the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw onset date, 272 reports of the naïve group and 86 reports of the post-zoledronic acid group were analyzed. The median onset in the naïve and post-zoledronic acid groups was 487.0 (25-75%: 274.0-690.8) and 305.5 (25-75%: 158.3-508.5) days, respectively. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred earlier in the post-zoledronic acid group than in the naïve group, and the log-rank test demonstrated a significant difference in their time transitions (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated a risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in naïve and post-zoledronic acid groups and a shorter onset time in the latter than in the former. Thus, healthcare professionals should take the early risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw into account when switching patients from zoledronic acid to denosumab treatment.

Risk of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Under Denosumab Compared to Bisphosphonates in Patients With Osteoporosis

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare but serious adverse event associated with antiresorptive treatment. There is little evidence regarding the incidence of ONJ among patients with osteoporosis who are treated with denosumab versus bisphosphonates (BPs). The aim of this study was to determine the risk of ONJ in a real-world population. Subjects who underwent at least one dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination were included in the osteoporosis register of the Swiss Society of Rheumatology between January 1, 2015, and September 30, 2019. Statistical analyses included incidence rates, rate ratios, and hazard ratios for ONJ, considering sequential therapies and drug holidays as covariates. Among 9956 registered patients, 3068 (89% female, median age 69 years [63 to 76]) were treated with BPs or denosumab for a cumulative duration of 11,101 and 4236 patient-years, respectively. Seventeen cases of ONJ were identified: 12 in patients receiving denosumab at the time of ONJ diagnosis and 5 in patients receiving oral or intravenous BP therapy. The diagnosis of ONJ was confirmed by independent and blinded maxillofacial surgeons, using the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons case definition of ONJ. The incidence of ONJ per 10,000 observed patient-years was 28.3 in patients receiving denosumab and 4.5 in patients with BP-associated ONJ, yielding a rate ratio of 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1 to 22.8), p < 0.001. Nine of 12 patients who developed ONJ during denosumab treatment had been pretreated with BPs, but none of the 5 patients with BP-related ONJ had previously received denosumab. The risk of ONJ was higher in patients receiving denosumab therapy compared with BPs (hazard ratio 3.49, 95% CI 1.16 to 10.47, p = 0.026). Previous BP therapy before switching to denosumab may be an additional risk factor for ONJ development. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).