Fatigue and endocrine symptoms among women with early breast cancer randomized to endocrine versus chemoendocrine therapy: Results from the TAILORx patient-reported outcomes substudy

Understanding pain related to adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer: A qualitative report

OBJECTIVES

Most patients report pain while taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for the treatment of breast cancer. While studies have examined patients' experiences with side effects, none solely capture patients' experiences with AET-related pain, a troubling symptom that reduces quality of life and impairs treatment adherence. This study explored themes of AET-related pain to inform future intervention development.

METHODS

Between November 2017 and November 2018, female patients (n = 30) with early-stage breast cancer enrolled between 3 and 36 months post-initiation of AET. Purposeful sampling was stratified by adherence level, age, distress level and time taking AET. Study staff conducted, transcribed and coded semi-structured interviews via inductive thematic coding to identify pain-related themes and achieved high inter-coded reliability (Kappa = 0.96).

RESULTS

Several pain-related themes were observed. Attitudes around pain are generally negative, and management needs are largely unmet. Patients reported preferences for non-pharmacological management strategies and cited AET pain as a reason for medication breaks but not discontinuation. Patients within 19 months of starting AET and low adherers reported more intense and disruptive pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' experiences varied by patient attributes and revealed modifiable factors that may be targeted through behavioural interventions. AET-related pain is a complex side effect for which psychosocial support may be beneficial.

De-escalation of five-year adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with estrogen receptor-low positive (immunohistochemistry staining 1%-10%) breast cancer: Propensity-matched analysis from a prospectively maintained cohort

BACKGROUND

The standard 5 years of endocrine therapy has demonstrated additional benefits compared with short-term (2-3 years) treatment in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer; however, data specific to ER-low positive breast cancer (1%-10% by immunohistochemistry) are limited, and it is unclear whether long-term treatment is still necessary for this subgroup.

METHODS

The authors used the prospectively maintained Breast Surgery Database of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center for this propensity-matched analysis. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and propensity score-matching methods were used to minimize bias. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All statistics were 2-sided.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2017, 22,768 consecutive women had pathologically confirmed, early stage breast cancer, and 1013 (4.45%) were identified with ER-low positive disease. Among these, 634 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into 3 groups: those who received no endocrine therapy (n = 89), those who received 2 to 3 years of endocrine therapy (n = 185), and those who received approximately 5 years of endocrine therapy (n = 360). At a median follow-up of 65 months, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival between patients who received 2 to 3 years and 5 years of endocrine therapy (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.33; P = .43). The findings were consistent after multivariate Cox analysis of the propensity score-matched samples (5 vs 2-3 years of treatment: HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.41-1.31; P = .30).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term endocrine therapy for 2 to 3 years might be an alternative for patients who have ER-low positive breast cancer instead of the standard 5 years of treatment.