Tobacco use and cancer-related symptom burden: Analysis of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study

Common and distinct risk factors that influence more severe and distressing shortness of breath profiles in oncology outpatients

BACKGROUND

Shortness of breath occurs in 10%-70% of oncology patients. Very little is known about interindividual variability in its severity and distress and associated risk factors. Using latent profile analyses (LPAs), purpose was to identify subgroups of patients with distinct severity and distress profiles for shortness of breath as single symptom dimensions. In addition, a joint LPA was done using patients' severity AND distress ratings. For each of the three LPAs, differences among the shortness of breath classes in demographic, clinical, symptom, stress, and resilience characteristics were evaluated.

METHODS

Patients completed ratings of severity and distress from shortness of breath a total of six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. All of the other measures were completed at enrollment (i.e., prior to the second or third cycle of chemotherapy). Separate LPAs were done using ratings of severity and distress, as well as a joint analysis using severity AND distress ratings. Differences among the latent classes were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

For severity, two classes were identified (Slight to Moderate [91.6%] and Moderate to Severe [8.4%]). For distress, two classes were identified (A Little Bit to Somewhat [83.9%] and Somewhat to Quite a Bit [16.1%]). For the joint LPA, two classes were identified (Lower Severity and Distress [79.9%] and Higher Severity and Distress [20.1%]). While distinct risk factors were associated with each of the LPAs, across the three LPAs, the common risk factors associated with membership in the worse class included: a past or current history of smoking, poorer functional status, and higher comorbidity burden. In addition, these patients had a higher symptom burden and higher levels of cancer-specific stress.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians can use the information provided in this study to identify high-risk patients and develop individualized interventions.

Identification of subgroups of patients with gastrointestinal cancers based on symptom severity and frequency: A latent profile and latent class analysis

PURPOSE

Identify subgroups of patients with gastrointestinal cancer with different frequency and severity of symptoms and assess differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, and degree of interference with daily life.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 202 patients with gastrointestinal cancers completed the Chinese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Gastrointestinal Cancer Module by convenience sampling. Subgroups of patients were identified using latent profile analysis and latent class analysis. Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney-U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences among subgroups.

RESULTS

In terms of symptom severity, low (70.3%), Moderate (13.4%), and high (16.3%) classes were identified. Compared with the other two classes, the Moderate group had a higher proportion of patients with a history of tobacco and alcohol, esophageal cancer, and gastric cancer (P < 0.05). In terms of symptom frequency, all -high (57.9%), high physical symptoms (9.9%), and all-low (32.2%) classes were identified. All-high groups had a younger age and a higher proportion of patients with cancer stage IV (P < 0.05). The high group had the most interference with daily life in both perspectives (P < 0.001), and psycho-emotional symptoms were frequent and severe.

CONCLUSIONS

The two perspectives of symptom severity and frequency can play a complementary role in identifying high-risk groups. Clinical practitioners should strengthen psychological interventions in young and advanced cancer patients and provide pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions for dysphagia symptoms in esophageal and gastric cancer patients with a history of tobacco and alcohol.