1
|
Hartsell WF, Simone CB, Godes D, Maggiore J, Mehta MP, Frank SJ, Metz JM, Choi JI. Temporal Evolution and Diagnostic Diversification of Patients Receiving Proton Therapy in the United States: A Ten-Year Trend Analysis (2012 to 2021) From the National Association for Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1069-1077. [PMID: 38163519 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The National Association for Proton Therapy conducted 8 surveys of all operational United States proton centers (2012-2021) and analyzed the patients treated, diagnoses, and treatment complexity to evaluate trends and diversification of patients receiving proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Detailed surveys were sent in 2015, which requested data from 2012 to 2014, and then annually thereafter to active proton centers in the United States. The numbers of patient treated at each center for the preceding calendar year(s) were collated for tumors in the following categories: central nervous system, intraocular, pituitary, skull base/skeleton, head/neck, lung, retroperitoneal/soft tissue sarcoma, pediatric (solid tumors in children of age ≤18), gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, female pelvic, prostate, breast, and "other." Complexity levels were assessed using Current Procedural Terminology codes 77520-77525. RESULTS Survey response rates were excellent (100% in 2015 to 94.9% in 2021); additional publicly available information provided near-complete information on all centers. Trend comparisons between 2012 and 2021 showed that the total annual number of patients treated with protons gradually increased from 5377 to 15,829. The largest numeric increases were for head/neck (316 to 2303; 7.3-fold), breast (93 to 1452; 15.6-fold), and gastrointestinal tumors (170 to 1259; 7.4-fold). Patient numbers also increased significantly for central nervous system (598 to 1743; 2.9-fold), pediatric (685 to 1870; 2.7-fold), and skull base tumors (179 to 514; 2.9-fold). For prostate cancer, the percentage of proton-treated patients decreased from 43.4% to 25.0% of the total. Simple compensated treatments decreased from 43% in 2012 to 7% in 2021, whereas intermediate complexity treatments increased from 45% to 73%. CONCLUSIONS The number of patients treated with protons is gradually increasing, with a substantial proportionate decline in patients with prostate cancer receiving proton therapy. The number of patients treated for "commonly accepted" indications for protons (eg, pediatric, central nervous system, and skull base tumors) is gradually increasing. Greater proportional increases were observed for breast, lung, head/neck, and gastrointestinal tumors. Treatment complexity is gradually increasing over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William F Hartsell
- Ascension Alexian Brothers Medical Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois; Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James M Metz
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Naumann P, Hoffmeister-Wittmann P, Ben Harrabi S, Seidensaal K, Weykamp F, Mielke T, Ellerbrock M, Habermehl D, Springfeld C, Dill MT, Longerich T, Schirmacher P, Mehrabi A, Chang DH, Hörner-Rieber J, Jäkel O, Haberer T, Combs SE, Debus J, Herfarth K, Liermann J. Carbon ion radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma provides excellent local control: The prospective phase I PROMETHEUS trial. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:101063. [PMID: 38737600 PMCID: PMC11087711 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy. However, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is more effective for sparing non-tumorous liver. High linear energy transfer could promote therapy efficacy. Japanese and Chinese studies on hypofractionated CIRT have yielded excellent results. Because of different radiobiological models and the different etiological spectrum of HCC, applicability of these results to European cohorts and centers remains questionable. The aim of this prospective study was to assess safety and efficacy and to determine the optimal dose of CIRT with active raster scanning based on the local effect model (LEM) I. Methods CIRT was performed every other day in four fractions with relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted fraction doses of 8.1-10.5 Gy (total doses 32.4-42.0 Gy [RBE]). Dose escalation was performed in five dose levels with at least three patients each. The primary endpoint was acute toxicity after 4 weeks. Results Twenty patients received CIRT (median age 74.7 years, n = 16 with liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh scores [CP] A5 [n = 10], A6 [n = 4], B8 [n = 1], and B9 [n = 1]). Median follow up was 23 months. No dose-limiting toxicities and no toxicities exceeding grade II occurred, except one grade III gamma-glutamyltransferase elevation 12 months after CIRT, synchronous to out-of-field hepatic progression. During 12 months after CIRT, no CP elevation occurred. The highest dose level could be applied safely. No local recurrence developed during follow up. The objective response rate was 80%. Median overall survival was 30.8 months (1/2/3 years: 75%/64%/22%). Median progression-free survival was 20.9 months (1/2/3 years: 59%/43%/43%). Intrahepatic progression outside of the CIRT target volume was the most frequent pattern of progression. Conclusions CIRT of HCC yields excellent local control without dose-limiting toxicity. Impact and implications To date, safety and efficacy of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma have only been evaluated prospectively in Japanese and Chinese studies. The optimal dose and fractionation when using the local effect model for radiotherapy planning are unknown. The results are of particular interest for European and American particle therapy centers, but also of relevance for all specialists involved in the treatment and care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, as we present the first prospective data on carbon ion radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma outside of Asia. The excellent local control should encourage further use of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and design of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Trials Registration The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01167374).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Naumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Xcare Praxis für Strahlentherapie, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Paula Hoffmeister-Wittmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Mielke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Malte Ellerbrock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Habermehl
- Wilhelm-Conrad-Röntgen-Klinik Gießen, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Gießen, Germany
| | - Christoph Springfeld
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael T. Dill
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases, Intoxication, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Experimental Hepatology, Inflammation and Cancer Research Group, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Longerich
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral & Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - De-Hua Chang
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Safavi AH, Dawson LA, Mesci A. Do We Have a Winner? Advocating for SBRT in HCC Management. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100740. [PMID: 38380116 PMCID: PMC10876598 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
•Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective locoregional therapy for inoperable patients with HCC.•SBRT compares favorably with other local therapies in terms of local control, survival, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness.•SBRT should be considered and discussed in multidisciplinary management of appropriate HCC patients.•Advances in SBRT and novel combinations with systemic therapy may further widen the therapeutic index in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H. Safavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura A. Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aruz Mesci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mizumoto M, Ogino H, Okumura T, Terashima K, Murakami M, Ogino T, Tamamura H, Akimoto T, Waki T, Katoh N, Araya M, Onoe T, Takagi M, Iwata H, Numajiri H, Okimoto T, Uchinami Y, Maruo K, Shibuya K, Sakurai H. Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Prospective Registry Study in Japan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:725-733. [PMID: 37778422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A prospective multicenter registry study was started May 2016 in Japan to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients who received PBT for HCC from May 2016 to June 2018 were registered in the database of the Particle Beam Therapy Committee and Subcommittee of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS Of the 755 registered patients, 576 with initial PBT and no duplicate cancer were evaluated. At final follow-up, 322 patients were alive and 254 had died. The median follow-up period for survivors was 39 months (0-58 months). The median OS time of the 576 patients was 48.8 months (95% CI, 42.0-55.6 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were 83.8% (95% CI, 80.5%-86.6%), 68.5% (64.5%-72.2%), 58.2% (53.9%-62.2%), and 50.1% (44.9%-55.0%), respectively. Recurrence was observed in 332 patients, including local recurrence in 45 patients. The median PFS time was 14.7 months (95% CI, 12.4-17.0 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year PFS rates were 55.2% (95% CI, 51.0%-59.2%), 37.5% (33.5%-41.5%), 30.2% (26.3%-34.2%), and 22.8% (18.5%-27.4%), respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were significantly higher for tumor size <5 versus 5 to 10 cm (P < .001) and <5 versus ≥10 cm (P < .001); Child-Pugh score A/B versus C (P < .001); and distance of the tumor from the gastrointestinal tract <1 versus 1 to 2 cm (P < .008) and <1 versus >2 cm (P < .001). At final follow-up, 27 patients (4.7%) had late adverse events of grade 3 or higher, with liver failure (n = 7), and dermatitis (n = 7) being most common. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter prospective data registry indicated that PBT for HCC gives good therapeutic effects (3-year local control rate of 90%) with a low risk of severe late adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, 679-5165, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogino
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, 4423 Higashikata, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, 891-0304, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Tamamura
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Fukui, 910-8526, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Takahiro Waki
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Okayama, 708-0841, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Institute of Medicine, Hokkaido, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Masayuki Araya
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8510, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Onoe
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntou-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Masaru Takagi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 065-0033, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, 679-5165, Japan
| | - Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Institute of Medicine, Hokkaido, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gutman MJ, Serra LM, Koshy M, Katipally RR. SBRT for Liver Tumors: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:1-10. [PMID: 38495259 PMCID: PMC10940045 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases, and cholangiocarcinoma. Emerging prospective evidence has demonstrated the benefit and low rates of toxicity across a broad range of clinical contexts. We provide an introduction for the interventional radiologist, with a discussion of underlying themes such as tumor dose-response, mitigation of liver toxicity, and the technical considerations relevant to performing liver SBRT. Ultimately, we recommend that SBRT should be routinely included in the armamentarium of locoregional therapies for liver malignancies, alongside those liver-directed therapies offered by interventional radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Gutman
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lucas M. Serra
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew Koshy
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rohan R. Katipally
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Niitsu H, Mizumoto M, Li Y, Nakamura M, Ishida T, Iizumi T, Saito T, Numajiri H, Makishima H, Nakai K, Oshiro Y, Maruo K, Sakurai H. Tumor Response on Diagnostic Imaging after Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:357. [PMID: 38254846 PMCID: PMC10814092 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up after treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be mostly performed using dynamic CT or MRI, but there is no common evaluation method after radiation therapy. The purpose of this study is to examine factors involved in tumor reduction and local recurrence in patients with HCC treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) and to evaluate HCC shrinkage after PBT. METHODS Cases with only one irradiated lesion or those with two lesions irradiated simultaneously were included in this study. Pre- and post-treatment lesions were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) by measuring the largest diameter. RESULTS The 6-, 12-, and 24-month CR + PR rates after PBT were 33.1%, 57.5%, and 76.9%, respectively, and the reduction rates were 25.1% in the first 6 months, 23.3% at 6-12 months, and 14.5% at 13-24 months. Cases that reached CR/PR at 6 and 12 months had improved OS compared to non-CR/non-PR cases. CONCLUSIONS It is possible that a lesion that reached SD may subsequently transition to PR; it is reasonable to monitor progress with periodic imaging evaluations even after 1 year of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikaru Niitsu
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Yinuo Li
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Masatoshi Nakamura
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Toshiki Ishida
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Takashi Saito
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Hirokazu Makishima
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Kei Nakai
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| | - Yoshiko Oshiro
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8558, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan;
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Proton Medical Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (H.N.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (T.I.); (T.I.); (T.S.); (H.N.); (H.M.); (K.N.); (Y.O.); (H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee SU, Kim TH. Current evidence and the potential role of proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023; 29:958-968. [PMID: 37822213 PMCID: PMC10577334 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death, and external beam radiation therapy has emerged as a promising approach for managing HCC. Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers dosimetric advantages over X-ray therapy, with superior physical properties known as the Bragg peak. PBT holds promise for reducing hepatotoxicity and allowing safe dose-escalation to the tumor. It has been tried in various clinical conditions and has shown promising local tumor control and survival outcomes. A recent phase III trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of PBT in local tumor control compared to current standard radiofrequency ablation in early-stage HCC. PBT also tended to show more favorable outcomes compared to transarterial chemoembolization in the intermediate stage, and has proven effective in-field disease control and safe toxicity profiles in advanced HCC. In this review, we discuss the rationale, clinical studies, optimal indication, and future directions of PBT in HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Uk Lee
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zaki P, Chuong MD, Schaub SK, Lo SS, Ibrahim M, Apisarnthanarax S. Proton Beam Therapy and Photon-Based Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Next Frontiers of Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2023; 22:15330338231206335. [PMID: 37908130 PMCID: PMC10621304 DOI: 10.1177/15330338231206335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has increasingly been utilized in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to technological advances with positive clinical outcomes. Innovations in EBRT include improved image guidance, motion management, treatment planning, and highly conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Moreover, proton beam therapy (PBT) and magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) have expanded the capabilities of EBRT. PBT offers the advantage of minimizing low- and moderate-dose radiation to the surrounding normal tissue, thereby preserving uninvolved liver and allowing for dose escalation. MRgRT provides the advantage of improved soft tissue delineation compared to computerized tomography (CT) guidance. Additionally, MRgRT with online adaptive therapy is particularly useful for addressing motion not otherwise managed and reducing high-dose radiation to the normal tissue such as the stomach and bowel. PBT and online adaptive MRgRT are emerging technological advancements in EBRT that may provide a significant clinical benefit for patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Zaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael D. Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Stephanie K. Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mariam Ibrahim
- School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada
| | | |
Collapse
|