Breast fine-needle aspiration cytology performance in the high-risk screening population: a study of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers

The role of the IAC Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and the ACR Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System in the evaluation of breast lesions

BACKGROUND

Stratification of breast lesions for appropriate management is achieved through an integration of clinical examination, imaging, and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). The current study aimed to evaluate the combined effectiveness of the widely used Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) with the recently proposed International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was done on all breast FNABs from 2016 through 2020. The cases were categorised according to the IAC Yokohama System. Histopathological correlation of the BI-RADS and IAC Yokohama System was performed. The rate of malignancy (ROM) for each category of the BI-RADS and IAC Yokohama System was calculated.

RESULTS

The ROM values for categories I to V were 38%, 0.6%, 21.9%, 100%, and 97%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of FNAB with category III assumed as malignant were 98.9%, 85%, 76.1%, 99.3%, and 89.5%, respectively. With category III assumed as benign, these indices were 90.8%, 98.9%, 97.5%, 95.7%, and 96.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of BI-RADS were 91.5%, 81.9%, 72%, 95%, and 85.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FNAB is still an indispensable test in the evaluation of breast lesions. The utilisation of the IAC Yokohama reporting system for breast cytology in conjunction with ACR BI-RADS aids in better stratification of lesions.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology versus Core-Needle Biopsy for Breast Lesions: A Dilemma of Superiority between the Two

INTRODUCTION

Core-needle biopsy (CNB) is a minimally invasive procedure used in preoperative diagnosis of breast lumps. It has been seen that in few years, the CNB seems to be replacing the fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), although no study had yet conclusively proved a superiority of one over the other.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to study the cytohistological spectrum of palpable breast lesions and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC versus CNB for breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Pathology and Surgery, over a period of 1 year in 152 patients. All the patients were subjected to FNAC and CNB. Cytosmears were stained with May-Grunwald Giemsa and hematoxylin and eosin was done on CNB and excision biopsy (EB) specimens. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated in percentage with 95% confidence interval with reference to CNB/surgical specimens. Kappa statistics were used to compare the level of agreement between FNAC versus CNB and CNB versus surgical specimens.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were taken for FNAC and CNB. EB was performed in only 104 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FNAC verses CNB in correlation with subsequent histopathology were found to be (93.40 vs. 94.06%), (97.50 vs. 100.00%), (99.00 vs. 100.00%), (84.78 vs. 33.33%), and (94.52 vs. 94.23%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CNB has overcome the pitfall of FNAC but CNB cannot replace FNAC but both procedures are complementary to each other.

AI for reading screening mammograms: the need for circumspection

KEY POINTS

• The studies on AI reading of screening mammograms have methodological limitations that undermine the conclusion that AI could do better than radiologists. • These studies do not informon numbers of extra breast cancers found by AI that could represent overdiagnosis. • The ability of AI to detect breast cancers is overestimated because there are no result on biopsy procedures that should be performed when mammograms are positive at AI reading but not at radiology reading.

FNAC of Breast Lesions with Special Reference to IAC Standardized Reporting and Comparative Study of Cytohistological Grading of Breast Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

International Academy of Cytology (IAC) has established a process to produce comprehensive and standardized approach to fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) reporting. They have categorized the breast lesions in C1 to C5. (C1-Insufficient material, C2-Benign, C3- Atypical, C4-Suspicious & C5-Malignant).

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of study is to classify various breast lesions (C1 to C5) and to grade breast carcinoma on FNAC using Robinson's grading system which is then correlated with modified Bloom-Richardson grading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All routine FNAC for breast lump were included in the study during the period from Jan 2016 to Jan 2017. The study was conducted in the Department of pathology and lab medicine of a tertiary care hospital in central India.

RESULTS

A total 225 female patients were included in the study, with an age group ranging from 15 - 79 years, with lesions in breast were taken. C1 lesions were found in 3 cases, C2 in 186 cases, C3 in 13 cases, C4 in 4 cases, and C5 in 19 cases. Correlation of cytohistological grading was obtained in 108 cases.

CONCLUSION

Cytological categorization based on IAC structured reporting will enhance the reproducibility of reports among pathologist & clinicians. With the comparison between cytohistological nuclear grading, the cytoprognostic scores will help in evaluating the aggressiveness of tumor, predicts histological grade and prognosis. It could be a useful parameter for selecting neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

The role of fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses

Background:

The modern approach to palpable breast masses is to get cytopathologic diagnosis before definitive surgery. We aimed to compare fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with core biopsy in histopathologic diagnosis of palpable breast masses.

Materials and Methods:

Data were collected on 123 women who have suspicious palpable breast masses from 2007 to 2010.

Results:

Of the 123 patients, core biopsies were performed on 64 patients (Group 1) and FNAC on 59 patients (Group 2). Malignancy was confirmed in 25 out of 32 clinically suspicious patients in Group 1 (78.1%), and 20 out of 21 participants in Group 2 (95.2%). Among the clinically suspicious patients, 81.8% of 33 patients in Group 1, and 90.3% of 31 patients in Group 2 were identified malignancy. Sensitivity was 100% for core biopsy and 95% for FNAC. Specificity was 100% in both procedures. False negativity rate in FNAC were 5%.

Conclusion:

Sensitivity and specificity showed that in the case of true histopathologic classification, core biopsy is superior to FNAC. Nevertheless, FNAC's role as a fast, simple and cheap diagnosis cannot be ignored. It is an effective diagnostic tool in most patients, in comparison to the correct and specific typing of core biopsies in benign lesions which protect patients from the open biopsy.