Ancillary tests in the diagnosis of liver and pancreatic neoplasms

Cholangiocarcinoma: Pathologic and Molecular Classification in the Era of Precision Medicine

CONTEXT.—

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous cancer of the bile duct, and its diagnosis is often challenging.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide insights into state-of-the-art approaches for the diagnosis of CCA.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review via PubMed search and authors' experiences.

CONCLUSIONS.—

CCA can be categorized as intrahepatic or extrahepatic. Intrahepatic CCA is further classified into small-duct-type and large-duct-type, whereas extrahepatic CCA is classified into distal and perihilar according to site of origin within the extrahepatic biliary tree. Tumor growth patterns include mass forming, periductal infiltrating, and intraductal tumors. The clinical diagnosis of CCA is challenging and usually occurs at an advanced tumor stage. Pathologic diagnosis is made difficult by tumor inaccessibility and challenges in distinguishing CCA from metastatic adenocarcinoma to the liver. Immunohistochemical stains can assist in differentiating CCA from other malignancies, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, but no distinctive CCA-specific immunohistochemical profile has been identified. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing-based high-throughput assays have identified distinct genomic profiles of CCA subtypes, including genomic alterations that are susceptible to targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Detailed histopathologic and molecular evaluations of CCA by pathologists are critical for correct diagnosis, subclassification, therapeutic decision-making, and prognostication. The first step toward achieving these goals is to acquire a detailed understanding of the histologic and genetic subtypes of this heterogeneous tumor group. Here, we review state-of-the-art approaches that should be applied to establish a diagnosis of CCA, including clinical presentation, histopathology, staging, and the practical use of genetic testing methodologies.

An Update on the Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Pancreatic/Liver/Gastrointestinal Luminal Tract Disorders

CONTEXT.—

Immunohistochemistry serves as an ancillary diagnostic tool for a wide variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic disorders, including infections, workup of inflammatory conditions, and subtyping neoplasms of the pancreas/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract. In addition, immunohistochemistry is also used to detect a variety of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

OBJECTIVE.—

To highlight an update on the role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of pancreatic/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract disorders.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool, assisting in the diagnosis of problematic tumors and benign lesions of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract, and also in the prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

Cytopathology of solid pancreatic neoplasms: An algorithmic approach to diagnosis

The classification and management of solid pancreatic neoplasms has expanded significantly in recent years because of advances in immunohistochemical markers, molecular diagnostics, and therapeutics. Solid pancreatic masses are subdivided into 1) ill-defined, scirrhous, and stroma-rich (ductal adenocarcinoma) and 2) well circumscribed, cellular, and stroma-poor (including neuroendocrine neoplasms, acinar cell carcinoma, pancreatoblastoma, and solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm). Definitive diagnosis, particularly of stroma-poor, circumscribed tumors, requires the incorporation of radiologic and cytologic findings, along with the judicious use of (broad, but limited) immunohistochemical panels (pancytokeratin and neuroendocrine [synaptophysin], acinar [trypsin], and solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm [β-catenin] markers), along with unstained slides. Depending on the initial results, immunohistochemical panels should be expanded to include more confirmatory (acinar and neuroendocrine) markers. This ensures that adequate material is available for definitive diagnosis/subclassification and, in some cases, grading, and/or molecular studies, particularly of grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms and mixed-lineage tumors. The objective of this review is to expand the understanding of the cytomorphology of solid pancreatic neoplasms using an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in their diagnosis. Knowledge and understanding of recent updates in the classification of solid pancreatic neoplasms ensures that cytopathologists appropriately triage specimens, judiciously use and interpret ancillary studies, and incorporate these results in reporting.

Immunocytochemistry for diagnostic cytopathology-A practical guide

Cytological specimens, which are obtained by minimally invasive methods, are an excellent source of diagnostic material. Sometimes they are the only material available for diagnosis as well as for prognostic/predictive markers. When cytomorphology is not straightforward, ancillary tests may be required for a definitive diagnosis to guide clinical management. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is the most common and practical ancillary tool used to reach a diagnosis when cytomorphology is equivocal, to differentiate entities with overlapping morphological features, and to determine the cell lineage and the site of origin of a metastatic neoplasm. Numerous immunomarkers are available, and some are expressed in multiple neoplasms. To rule out entities within a differential diagnosis, the use of more than one marker, sometimes panels, is necessary. ICC panels for diagnostic purposes should be customised based on the clinical context and cytomorphology, and the markers should be used judiciously to preserve material for additional tests for targeted therapies in the appropriate setting. This review offers a practical guide for the use of ICC for diagnostic cytopathology, covering the most commonly encountered non-hematolymphoid diagnostic scenarios in various body sites.

Pathologic interpretation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy for pancreatic lesions

Pathologic interpretation of endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology/biopsy specimens is one of the most challenging tasks in cytology and surgical pathology practice, as the procedure often yields minimal amounts of diagnostic material and contains contaminants, such as blood cells and normal intestinal mucosa. EUS-FNA cytology/biopsy will nevertheless become a more popular procedure for evaluation of various pancreatic lesions because they are difficult to approach with conventional endoscopic procedures. Pathologists should understand the structural differences and limitations of EUS-FNA that make pathologic diagnosis difficult. Ancillary tests are available for differential diagnosis of EUS-FNA for various pancreatic lesions. Immunostains are the most commonly used ancillary tests, and pathologists should able to choose the necessary panel for differential diagnosis. Pathologists should review clinical history and radiologic and/or EUS findings before selecting an immunostain panel and making a pathologic diagnosis. In addition, one’s threshold of malignancy should be adjusted according to the appropriate clinical setting to avoid under-evaluation of pathologic diagnoses. Clinico-pathologic correlation is essential in pathologic evaluation of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions. Pathologists can reduce errors by correlating clinical and radiologic findings when evaluating EUS-FNA. Some molecular tests can be applied in differential diagnosis of pancreatic neoplastic and cystic lesions. Molecular data should be used as supportive evidence of a specific disease entity, rather than direct evidence, and should be correlated with clinico-pathologic findings to avoid errors in pathologic diagnosis.