Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a robust marker for identifying and grading pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Comparison of INSM1 immunostaining with established neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin A in over 14,000 neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors

INSM1 is a transcription factor protein which is increasingly used as an immunohistochemical marker for neuroendocrine differentiation. To determine the prevalence of INSM1 expression in tumors and its expression pattern in normal tissues, tissue microarrays containing 14,908 samples from 117 different tumor types/subtypes as well as 76 different normal tissues were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. INSM1 was positive in 89.2% of 471 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and in 3.5% of 11,815 non-neuroendocrine neoplasms that were successfully analyzed. At least an occasional weak INSM1 positivity was observed in 59 different non-neuroendocrine tumor entities, of which 15 entities contained at least one case with strong INSM1 staining. A comparison with synaptophysin and chromogranin A staining revealed that in NEN, synaptophysin showed the highest sensitivity (93.3%), followed by INSM1 (89.2%) and chromogranin A (87.5%). In neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), sensitivity was highest for INSM1 (88.0%), followed by synaptophysin (86.5%) and chromogranin A (66.4%). If INSM1 was used as an additional marker, the sensitivity for detecting neuroendocrine differentiation in NEN increased from 96.6% (synaptophysin and chromogranin A) to 97.2% (synaptophysin, chromogranin A and INSM1). Our study shows that INSM1 is a useful additional marker for neuroendocrine differentiation with high sensitivity, particularly in NEC.

INSM1 expression in primary and metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms at distinct locations

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been reported as a valuable marker for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The aims of this study were to evaluate any change in INSM1 expression between primary and metastatic NENs in distinct locations, as well as the expression of INSM1 at different differentiation levels. Furthermore, we would also investigate the significance of INSM1 expression in non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (non-NENs).

METHODS

We collected 78 cases with primary NENs and 16 cases with metastatic NENs. An addition 7 cases of non-NENs with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation and 84 cases of other non-NENs, respectively, were included as controls.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 82% of primary NENs and 88% of metastatic NENs expressed INSM1 with no difference between them. There was no difference in the expression of INSM1 in the lung and digestive system, and its staining pattern was independent of tumor differentiation or location. The proportion of INSM1 -positive in non-NENs with NE differentiation was significantly higher than that in other non-NENs. INSM1 sensitivity for primary NENs (82%) was comparable to Chromogranin A (82%), less than that of Synaptophysin (96%) and CD56 (94%); specificity was higher (96% vs 94%, 82%, and 89%, respectively). The sensitivity of INSM1 for well differentiated NENs was significantly higher than that of poorly differentiated NENs (100% vs 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

INSM1 is a useful neuroendocrine marker in primary and metastatic NENs, helping to identify primary NENs with different degrees of differentiation. The expression of INSM1 was independent of tumor location. It should be with caution to interpret the expression of INSM1 in non-NENs that morphologically resemble NENs.

Biomarkers in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) represent a heterogenous group of rare tumors emanating from neuroendocrine cells that are clinically silent for prolonged periods of time without detection. Traditional biomarkers lack sufficiently high enough specificity and sensitivity for these tumors and their secreted products. New molecules are sought to improve accuracy of detection and monitoring of GEP-NENs. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent advances in the discovery of novel biomarkers and their potential characteristics and utility as markers of GEP-NENs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent GEP-NEN investigations regarding NETest demonstrate superior sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis and disease monitoring as compared with chromogranin A. Among several tissue-based emergent candidate molecules as biomarkers for GEP-NEN INSM1 has demonstrated consistently excellent characteristics when compared with traditional markers including chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56.

SUMMARY

For the diagnosis and clinical monitoring of NEN, there still exists a considerable need for better biomarkers. Novel technology has resulted in a promising liquid biopsy for the detection and monitoring of GEP-NENs. The search for improved tissue biomarkers has resulted in identification of one potential candidate whereas several others remain in the investigatory phase.

Unusual Microsatellite-Instable Mixed Neuroendocrine and Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm: A Clinicopathological Inspection and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine and non-endocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are challenging to diagnose and manage clinically. The current understanding of MiNENs' pathobiology, molecular mechanisms, and management is incomplete. Though microsatellite instability (MSI) is known to impact carcinogenesis, reports examining MSI mechanisms for MiNENs are rare.

METHODS

We report an unusual colonic MSI-MiNEN uncovered in an 89-year-old woman and the review of the literature.

RESULTS

Pathologic inspection revealed a high-grade carcinoma composed of tumor cells with neuroendocrine histologic traits and immunophenotype intermixed with mucin-containing signet ring-like cells arranged in nested and micronodular patterns. Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 mismatch repair proteins was detected in tumor cells. INSM1 immunostaining highlighted about 50% of the tumour, further reinforcing the MiNEN diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing identified multiple carcinogenic mutations. Because of the advanced stage of the tumor and its adhesion to the adjacent organs, surgical resection was aborted; immunotherapy was initiated. The tumor is in remission 30 months following initiation of treatment, and the patient remains asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

This unique MSI MiNEN was characterized by its immunohistochemical and molecular signatures and illustrated how correctly diagnosing MSI can strongly improve a patient's outcomes.

Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are a rare group of tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells of the digestive system. Their incidence has increased over the last decades. The specific pathogenetic mechanisms underlying GEP-NEN development have not been completely revealed. Unfunctional GEP-NENs are usually asymptomatic; some grow slowly and thus impede early diagnosis, which ultimately results in a high rate of misdiagnosis. Therefore, many GEP-NEN patients present with later staged tumors. Motivated hereby, research attention for diagnosis and treatment for GEP-NENs increased in recent years. The result of which is great progress in clinical diagnosis and treatment. According to the most recent clinical guidelines, improved grading standards can accurately define poorly differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), which are subclassified into large and small cell NECs. Combining different functional imaging methods facilitates precise diagnosis. The expression of somatostatin receptors helps to predict prognosis. Genetic analyses of mutations affecting death domain associated protein (DAXX), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1), alpha thalassemia/intellectual disability syndrome X-linked (ATRX), retinoblastoma transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB 1), and mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD 4) help distinguishing grade 3 NENs from poorly differentiated NECs. The aim of this review is to summarize the latest research progress on diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs.

An update on the development of concepts, diagnostic criteria, and challenging issues for neuroendocrine neoplasms across different digestive organs

Digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of heterogeneous neoplasms found throughout the digestive tract, with different behaviour and genetic background. In the last few years, nomenclature and WHO/UICC classifications of digestive NENs have changed, and molecular classifications have emerged, especially in pancreatic locations. Increasing patho-molecular details are needed to diagnose the different categories of NEN, including the use of helpful immunohistochemical markers. In this review, we address these topics in three successive chapters. We first briefly review recent updates in classifications, discuss important grading and proliferating issues and advances in the molecular understanding of NEN. Then, we provide an update on diagnosis, including the most important differential diagnoses of NEN, with a focus on high-grade neoplasms and mixed tumours. Finally, we highlight a variety of currently used and next-generation predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers of tumour origin and describe some site specificities of gastrointestinal NEN. We specifically focus on biomarkers available to pathologists with the potential to change the way patients with NEN are diagnosed and treated.

INSM1, a Novel Biomarker for Detection of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Cytopathologists’ View

Background: Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been considered as a novel immunostain for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and is hypothesized to be more reliable than first-generation NET biomarkers, such as CGA (chromogranin A), SYP (synaptophysin) and CD56 (neural cell adhesion molecule). In this review, we summarize existing literature on INSM1′s reliability as an immunostain for detection of various NETs, its results in comparison to first-generation NET biomarkers, and its expression in both non-NETs and benign tissues/cells on cytology specimens (cell blocks/smears).

Insulinoma-associated protein 1(INSM1) is a superior marker for the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendoerine neoplasms: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

An increasing number of studies have shown that insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a robust marker for the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN). The overall diagnostic accuracy of INSM1 for GEP-NEN remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to estimate the diagnostic value of INSM1 for GEP-NEN through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched relevant studies addressing the accuracy of INSM1 in the diagnosis of GEP-NEN from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) as well as from reference lists since the establishment of the database to January 12, 2021. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic value of INSM1 for GEP-NEN. Statistical analysis was performed by Stata 15.0 and RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

Nine studies with a total of 393 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of INSM1 for the diagnosis of GEP-NEN were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.87-1.00) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98), respectively. The PLR and NLR were 23.3 (95% CI: 13.3-40.8) and 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.14), respectively. The DOR was 380.31 (95% CI: 164.14-881.21), and the area under the curve (AUC) of SROC curve was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that INSM1 is an effective marker for the diagnosis of GEP-NEN with high sensitivity and specificity. INSM1 is recommended for clinical application to improve the diagnostic accuracy of GEP-NEN. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Cytopathological characteristics of solitary fibrous tumour involving the pancreas by fine needle aspiration: Making an accurate preoperative diagnosis in an uncommon location

BACKGROUND

Solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) is a unique mesenchymal neoplasm with classic features on histology and is characterised by the NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion. There are rare reports of SFTs with pancreatic involvement and only two cases in the literature reporting its features by preoperative fine needle aspiration (FNA). Herein, we characterise the cytomorphological features of four SFTs involving the pancreas by FNA to establish a preoperative diagnostic approach.

METHODS

The anatomic pathology archives of two academic medical centres were searched to identify patients with a pancreatic FNA cytology specimen and a confirmed diagnosis of SFT by surgical resection. The clinical history, pathological diagnosis, cytomorphological findings, and results of immunohistochemistry (IHC) were reviewed.

RESULTS

Four SFTs were identified from four patients with a median age of 59 years. The morphological features were variable but most frequently showed a bland spindled-to-epithelioid proliferation in fragments and single cells with small, oval, elongated, and hypochromatic nuclei in a haphazard arrangement with or without dense collagen. One tumour presented with a concurrent metastasis and showed a pure epithelioid component with necrosis and enlarged, hyperchromatic nuclei with conspicuous nucleoli and scattered mitoses. IHC was necessary for all diagnoses which were confirmed by surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

SFTs with pancreatic involvement are rare, and non-specific features and tumour heterogeneity can pose a diagnostic challenge on FNA; however, IHC can be used to make a definitive diagnosis. As a result, FNA is a simple, safe, cost-effective, and accurate approach that can be used to diagnose SFT in the pancreas.

Breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation: an update based on the latest WHO classification

Breast cancers with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation are very heterogeneous, comprising broadly cancers that are morphologically similar to NE tumors (NET) of other anatomic sites, infiltrating breast carcinomas, no special type (IBC-NST) and other special subtypes with NE morphology and/or NE markers expression. Depending on the classification schemes, they are variably included into "NE breast cancers". The latest WHO classification harmonized NE breast cancers with NE neoplasms (NEN) of other organ systems, defined NEN into well-differentiated NET (low Nottingham grade) and poorly-differentiated NE carcinoma (NEC) (high Nottingham grade). Other IBC with NE differentiation are diagnosed based on solely the non-NEN component. Due to the changes in diagnostic criteria, variable results were obtained in the previous studies on NE breast cancers. Hence, the clinical value of NE differentiation in breast cancers is not well investigated and understood. In this review, the current understanding in the pathogenesis, clinical, prognostic, immunhistochemical, and molecular features of "NE breast cancers" is summarized. Controversial issues in their diagnosis and classification are also discussed.

A limited panel of INSM1 and LEF1 immunostains accurately distinguishes between pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and solid pseudopapillary neoplasm

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) and well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) can show significant cytomorphological overlap. In this study, we evaluated the role of INSM1 and LEF1 immunohistochemical stains in distinguishing between these two tumors. 22 SPN and 25 PNET surgically resected cases were stained for both INSM1 and LEF1. All the 22 cases of SPN showed strong and diffuse nuclear staining for LEF1 (in >95 % of tumor cells), while all 25 PNET were negative for LEF1. All 25 PNET cases were positive for INSM1 (moderate to strong intensity nuclear staining in >50 % of the tumor cells), while all 22 cases of SPN were negative for INSM1. The results of our study show that a limited panel comprising of INSM1 and LEF1 immunostains accurately distinguishes between SPN and PNET.

Application of INSM1 in Diagnosis and Grading of Laryngeal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Chromogranin (CHG), synaptophysin (Syn), and CD56 are generally used in a panel to support diagnoses of laryngeal neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). However, the absence of expression of these markers does not completely exclude the diagnosis. INSM1 is a novel marker that is considered sufficiently sensitive and specific for NE differentiation. The aim of this study is not only to detect its sensitivity and specificity, but also to evaluate its application in grading for laryngeal NECs.

METHODS

The clinicopathological characteristics of the 25 cases with laryngeal NECs were retrospectively analyzed. The expressions of INSM1, CHG, Syn, and CD56 were detected by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Of the 25 laryngeal NECs, INSM1 had higher sensitivity (92%) than Syn (84%), CHG (76%) and CD56 (76%). The average H scores of INSM1, CD56, Syn, and CHG were 160, 37.5, 300, 300 for well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (WD-NEC); 190, 149, 209, 215 for moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (MD-NEC); 251, 208, 104, 25 for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma with small cell (SCNEC); 109, 160, 98, 26 for large cell types (LCNEC), respectively. Of these 98 non-neuroendocrine tumors, INSM1 expression was seen in nine (9%) tumors, all were squamous cell carcinoma. And INSM1 staining was generally focal.

CONCLUSION

INSM1 has high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of laryngeal NECs. For grading laryngeal NECs, Syn and CHG showed significant advantages in the diagnosis of WD-NEC and MD-NEC, whereas INSM1 and CD56 showed greater diagnostic value in the diagnosis of SCNEC and LCNEC, especially in SCNEC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Diagnostic Utility of INSM1 in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is shown to be an excellent marker for neuroendocrine differentiation. However, the diagnostic utility of INSM1 in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) has not yet been extensively investigated. INSM1 staining was performed on 21 MTCs, 7 MTC mimickers (including 3 papillary carcinomas, 2 poorly differentiated carcinomas, 1 follicular adenoma, and 1 nodular plasma cell hyperplasia), and 3 cases of C-cell hyperplasia. INSM1 staining of these cases was compared with the traditional MTC markers including calcitonin (CT), monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (mCEA), chromogranin A (CgA), and synaptophysin (Syn). The H-score was generated using the QuPath program, an open-source image analysis software. All 21 MTC cases and 3 C-cell hyperplasia cases were positive for all markers. The MTC mimickers were entirely negative for INSM1. INSM1 and Syn displayed, more consistently, high expression with minimal variability than CgA that showed a wide range of expression with significant variability. mCEA and CT exhibited mostly a high expression with some variability. Being a nuclear stain, interpretation was easier with INSM1 compared to other cytoplasmic markers. INSM1 is an excellent marker for neuroendocrine differentiation, entirely applicable in the diagnosis of MTC and C-cell hyperplasia with high sensitivity and specificity. In comparison with the traditional MTC markers, INSM1 is unique in the crisp nuclear staining pattern with a consistent, diffuse, and strong expression. INSM1 can be potentially combined with CT or mCEA as a dual stain, especially when the lesional tissue is limited for a panel of immunostains.

[Neuroendocrine markers in parathyroid tumors]

The parathyroid glands (PTGs) are a key regulator of calcium and phosphorus metabolism in the human body. In terms of their, morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics, PTGs are neuroendocrine organs, and their neoplasms are neuroendocrine tumors. These neoplasms include adenoma and cancer; in addition, glandular hyperplasia may develop, which is most characteristic of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN1, MEN2a, and MEN4) syndromes. The morphological characteristics of pathologically altered PTGs in MEN syndromes are variable. The analysis and generalization of knowledge about the features and expression of various immunohistochemical markers in PTG tissue in health and in diseases are useful in the practical work of not only pathologists, but also clinicians of various specialties.

Long Non-coding RNAs in Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are classified into low-grade neuroendocrine tumors and high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). There are significant differences in therapeutic strategies of the different NEN subtypes, and therefore, precise classification of pulmonary NENs is critical. However, challenges in pulmonary NEN classification include overlap of diagnostic histological features among the subtypes and reduced or negative expression of neuroendocrine markers in poorly differentiated pulmonary NECs. Recently, transcription factor insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) was identified as a sensitive marker of neuroendocrine and neuroepithelial differentiation. In this study, INSM1 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry in greater than 94% of pulmonary NENs, indicating that it is a highly sensitive marker of pulmonary NENs and is useful to detect poorly differentiated pulmonary NECs. Although there are well-established morphological and immunohistologic criteria to diagnose pulmonary NENs, there is no universal consensus regarding prognostic markers of pulmonary NENs. Studies have shown that non-small cell lung cancers express long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which regulate gene expression, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and carcinogenesis. We characterized expression and function of lncRNAs, including HOX transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR), maternally expressed 3 (MEG3), and prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) in pulmonary NENs, including typical carcinoid tumors, atypical carcinoid tumors, small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC/NEC), and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC/NEC). In situ hybridization and real-time polymerase chain reaction studies showed higher expression (p < 0.01) of all lncRNAs in SCLC/NEC. Small interfering RNA studies indicated a role for MEG3 and PCA3 in tumor proliferation. Therefore, these lncRNAs may serve as prognostic indicators of pulmonary NEN aggressiveness and as possible therapeutic targets.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This article is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The guidelines panel consisted of medical oncologists, pathologists, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The panel reviewed a series of questions regarding the medical management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as questions regarding surveillance after resection. The available literature was reviewed for each of the question and panel members voted on controversial topics, and the recommendations were included in a document circulated to all panel members for a final approval.