Multi-institutional validation of a modified scheme for subcategorizing salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP)

A Retrospective Cytomorphologic Analysis of Salivary Gland Fine Needle Aspirates Classified as Salivary Gland Neoplasm of Uncertain Malignant Potential: A 6-year Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology is an effective reporting system for salivary gland fine needle aspirations with well-established risks of malignancy. Salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) comprises a heterogenous group of lesions which have features that can be recognized as at least neoplastic but preclude further classification into benign or malignant. In this study, we reviewed the cytomorphologic features of salivary gland fine needle aspirations diagnosed as SUMP at our institution (over the past 6 years) and correlated those with the final diagnosis on surgical follow up.

DESIGN

A retrospective search was performed to identify cases classified as SUMP at our institution from January 2018 to February 2024. Cytology slides were reviewed, and cases were subclassified based on key cytomorphologic features into the following categories: (1) basaloid, (2) oncocytic, (3) with clear cell features and (4) mixed features (myoepithelial/oncocytoid/squamoid features). Histologic diagnosis was recorded if available.

RESULTS

A total of 36 cases of SUMP were identified; 31/36 had surgical follow up; final diagnosis included 22 benign lesions (2 non-neoplastic and 20 benign neoplasms), and nine malignant lesions. The overall risk of neoplasm and risk of malignancy were 93.5% and 29% respectively, with the oncocytic sub-category recording the highest ROM (42.8%). Mucoepidermoid carcinoma was the most common malignant diagnosis and pleomorphic adenoma the most common benign diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the subclassification of SUMP lesions based on key cytomorphologic features, thereby aiding in refining this ambiguous entity and providing a precise risk assessment.

Risks of malignancy in the major nongynecologic cytopathology reporting systems: Critiques and discussions

The ever-increasing popularity of standardized systems for reporting cytopathology has led in part to much attention to and importance of the risk stratification schemes, especially the risks of malignancy (ROMs), which are associated with the different diagnostic categories and upon which recommendations for clinical management are based. However, it is well known that the ROM calculations are based on retrospective reviews of the existing literature, representing a heterogeneous patient population, and are plagued by significant biases and variations. Statistically, the ROM represents the post-test probability of malignancy, which changes with the test result and with the prevalence of malignancy (or pretest probability) in an individual practice setting and individual patient presentation. Therefore, the clinical utility of the ROM is questioned and likely needs a second look in the nongynecologic cytopathology reporting systems. In this communication, the authors discuss the status of the ROM estimates according to the most commonly used nongynecologic reporting systems, including for thyroid, salivary glands, and others, highlighting similarities and differences with a focus on the limitations of ROM estimates and their application in clinical practice.

How important are the cytomorphologic subtypes of the salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) category in the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology? An institutional experience 2018-2024

INTRODUCTION

Salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) is an important diagnostic category of the Milan System for reporting salivary gland cytology (MSRSGC). Further subcategorization by cytomorphologic subtypes has been recommended to risk-stratify cases. In this study, our institutional experience with the risk of neoplasm (RON) and risk of malignancy (ROM) based on cytomorphologic subcategorization of SUMP is reported. We also report the prevalence of malignancy (POM) at our institution.

METHODS

The pathology database was queried for cases of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosed as SUMP along with follow-up at our institution from 2018-February 2024. This study was approved by an institutional review board.

RESULTS

Of 1159 cases of salivary gland FNA specimens reported as per MSRSGC at our institution, 14.8% (171/1159 cases) were diagnosed as SUMP, with these reports verified by at least 16 cytopathologists. Surgical follow-up was available for 139/171 (81.3%) of these cases, for which the original cytomorphologic subgroups were as follows: 65 (46.8%) basaloid, 48 (34.5%) oncocytic/oncocytoid, 14 (10.1%) myoepithelial, 9 (6.5%) other, 2 (1.4%) clear cell, and 1 (0.7%) mucinous. The POM within SUMP at our institution is within a range of 29.8%-36.7%. When considering all cases, our institutional RON for SUMP was 97.8% (136/139), and the ROM was 36.7% (51/139). Notably, a significant portion of cases (36%, 50/139) underwent review at a daily intradepartmental consensus conference. Analysis revealed that SUMP cases that underwent consensus review had a ROM of 46% (23/50), versus 31.5% (28/89) in independently verified cases (p = .13). Of the cytomorphologic subgroups, basaloid SUMP in particular was more likely to be benign on resection when the case had been independently verified than after consensus review (p = .0082). When considering only the independently verified cases, the ROM for each subgroup was as follows: 38.7% (12/31) in oncocytic/oncocytoid, 20% (9/45) in basaloid, 33.3% (2/6) in myoepithelial, 60% (3/5) in "other", and 100% (1/1) in both mucinous and clear cell (p = .0407).

CONCLUSION

While the RON is high across all cytomorphologic subgroups of SUMP, the ROM does vary across the groups, with basaloid cytomorphology having the lowest ROM. This effect is seen in independently verified cases but not in cases having undergone consensus review.

Don't SUMP it! Utility of PLAG1 immunocytochemistry in basaloid SUMP subcategory

BACKGROUND

Basaloid salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (B-SUMP) is an indeterminate diagnostic subcategory, with pleomorphic adenoma (PA) representing the most common benign neoplasm. Pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 (PLAG1) staining is frequently seen in PAs and could aid in distinguishing them from other basaloid neoplasms. The authors evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunocytochemistry (ICC) in differentiating PAs from other basaloid neoplasms in smears and liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens.

METHODS

In total, 45 B-SUMP cytology aspirates and corresponding surgical excision specimens were identified. PLAG1 immunostaining was performed in all aspirates and surgical excision specimens and was scored as positive (strong/diffuse), equivocal (focal/weak), or negative.

RESULTS

PLAG1 ICC was performed directly on 38 smears and seven LBC specimens. PLAG1 was positive in 29 of 45 cases (64%), whereas six of 45 (13%) were equivocal, and 10 of 45 (22%) were negative. PLAG1-positive aspirates included 26 (90%) PAs, two (7%) basal cell adenomas (BCAs), and one (3%) carcinoma ex-PA. PLAG1-equivocal aspirates included four (67%) PAs and two (33%) BCAs, whereas negative aspirates included five (50%) BCAs, four (40%) adenoid cystic carcinomas, and one (10%) metastatic adenosquamous carcinoma. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were 87%, 86%, 93%, and 75%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 87%.

CONCLUSIONS

PLAG1 ICC is useful when positive (strong/diffuse) and can be reliably performed on smears and LBC specimens. PLAG1 was positive in most PAs and in a small subset of BCAs. Therefore, in the absence of atypical cytologic features, PLAG1-positive tumors could be diagnosed as benign, with a note favoring PA versus BCA. In contrast, PLAG1-negative/equivocal tumors should remain in the B-SUMP category.

Salivary gland neoplasms in small biopsies and fine needle aspirations

Salivary gland neoplasms are rare and represent a diverse group of head and neck tumors. Their diagnosis in limited cellularity specimens can be challenging as many of these have overlapping clinical, radiological presentation, and pathologic features. Fine needle aspiration and/or core biopsies are more of a norm than rarity to be performed preoperatively to provide invaluable information that can guide clinical management including surgery. Even though these limited specimens may not always provide a definitive diagnosis; they have high sensitivity in confirming primary neoplasia, assessing the tumor grade, and ruling out non-surgical disease. An algorithmic pattern based approach can help narrow the differential diagnosis; leading to a definitive diagnosis with the help of specific ancillary studies.

Salivary gland fine-needle aspiration biopsy: quality assurance results from a tertiary cancer center

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) plays a critical role in the management of patients with salivary gland lesions. A specific diagnosis can be difficult due to the wide range of lesions with overlapping morphologic features, potentially leading to interpretation errors. We analyzed the cytologic-histologic discrepancies identified in the quality assurance program of a major cancer center in cases of salivary gland FNAB and performed a root cause analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Salivary gland FNAB specimens performed during a 12-year period at a major tertiary cancer center were reviewed. The inclusion criteria for this study included FNAB cases of salivary glands with subsequent histologic or flow cytometry follow up. The cytologic diagnoses for these cases were recategorized according to the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) based on the original reports. The risk of neoplasm and malignancy based on the cases with subsequent resection or flow cytometry and the most common causes of discrepancy were analyzed.

RESULTS

The risk of neoplasm ranged from 41% to 99% and the risk of malignancy ranged from 22% to 99% among the different MSRSGC categories. Lymphoid and myoepithelial rich lesions were the most common miscategorized lesions using the MSRSGC. Reactive changes due to inflammation were associated with overcalls. The most common malignancy in the atypical category was mucoepidermoid carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Myoepithelial and lymphoid rich lesions arising in the salivary gland are associated with a higher risk of misclassification. The use of category IVB in the MSRSGC is appropriate for lesions with abundant myoepithelial cells. Reactive atypia seen in sialadenitis was the most common feature associated with overcall.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Parotid Tumors

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is widely used in clinical practice as a simple and minimally invasive test for parotid tumors that allows for preoperative estimation of benignancy and malignancy, histological type, and malignancy grade and can be performed on an outpatient basis. In recent years, cell blocks prepared with core needle biopsy (CNB) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) have increased the reliability of immunostaining and molecular biological testing, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy. In 2018, the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology was introduced, but it does not include malignancy grade or histological type, so we proposed the Osaka Medical College classification as a more clinically based cell classification that includes both types of information, and we have reported on its usefulness. This review gives an overview of the history and use of FNA and describes CNB and LBC and the two classification systems.