Terminal organization of the corticospinal projection from the arm/hand region of the rostral primary motor cortex (M1r or old M1) to the cervical enlargement (C5-T1) in rhesus monkey

Corticospinal and corticoreticulospinal projections benefit motor behaviors in chronic stroke

After corticospinal tract (CST) stroke, several motor deficits in the upper extremity (UE) emerge, including diminished muscle strength, motor control, and muscle individuation. Both the ipsilesional CST and contralesional corticoreticulospinal tract (CReST) innervate the paretic UE and may have different innervation patterns for the proximal and distal UE segments. These patterns may underpin distinct pathway relationships to separable motor behaviors. In this cross-sectional study of 15 chronic stroke patients and 28 healthy subjects, we examined two key questions: (1) whether segmental motor behaviors differentially relate to ipsilesional CST and contralesional CReST projection strengths, and (2) whether motor behaviors segmentally differ in the paretic UE. We measured strength, motor control, and muscle individuation in a proximal (biceps, BIC) and distal muscle (first dorsal interosseous, FDI) of the paretic UE. We measured the projection strengths of the ipsilesional CST and contralesional CReST to these muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Stroke subjects had abnormal motor control and muscle individuation despite strength comparable to healthy subjects. In stroke subjects, stronger ipsilesional CST projections were linked to superior motor control in both UE segments, whereas stronger contralesional CReST projections were linked to superior muscle strength and individuation in both UE segments. Notably, both pathways also shared associations with behaviors in the proximal segment. Motor control deficits were segmentally comparable, but muscle individuation was worse for distal motor performance. These results suggest that each pathway has specialized contributions to chronic motor behaviors but also work together, with varying levels of success in supporting chronic deficits.

Key points summary

Individuals with chronic stroke typically have deficits in strength, motor control, and muscle individuation in their paretic upper extremity (UE). It remains unclear how these altered behaviors relate to descending motor pathways and whether they differ by proximal and distal UE segment.In this study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine projection strengths of the ipsilesional corticospinal tract (CST) and contralesional corticoreticulospinal tract (CReST) with respect to quantitated motor behaviors in chronic stroke.We found that stronger ipsilesional CST projections were associated with better motor control in both UE segments, whereas stronger contralesional CReST projections were associated with better strength and individuation in both UE segments. In addition, projections of both pathways shared associations with motor behaviors in the proximal UE segment.We also found that deficits in strength and motor control were comparable across UE segments, but muscle individuation was worse with controlled movement in the distal UE segment.These results suggest that the CST and CReST have specialized contributions to chronic motor behaviors and also work together, although with different degrees of efficacy.

The Corticospinal System and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: IFCN handbook chapter

Corticospinal neurons located in motor areas of the cerebral neocortex project corticospinal axons which synapse with the spinal network; a parallel corticobulbar system projects to the cranial motor network and to brainstem motor pathways. The primate corticospinal system has a widespread cortical origin and an extensive range of different fibre diameters, including thick, fast-conducting axons. Direct cortico-motoneuronal (CM) projections from the motor cortex to arm and hand alpha motoneurons are a recent evolutionary feature, that is well developed in dexterous primates and particularly in humans. Many of these projections originate from the caudal subdivision of area 4 ('new' M1: primary motor cortex). They arise from corticospinal neurons of varied soma size, including those with fast- and relatively slow-conducting axons. This CM system has been shown to be involved in the control of skilled movements, carried out with fractionation of the distal extremities and at low force levels. During movement, corticospinal neurons are activated quite differently from 'lower' motoneurons, and there is no simple or fixed functional relationship between a so-called 'upper' motoneuron and its target lower motoneuron. There are key differences in the organisation and function of the corticospinal and CM system in primates versus non-primates, such as rodents. These differences need to be recognized when making the choice of animal model for understanding disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In this neurodegenerative brain disease there is a selective loss of fast-conducting corticospinal axons, and their synaptic connections, and this is reflected in responses to non-invasive cortical stimuli and measures of cortico-muscular coherence. The loss of CM connections influencing distal limb muscles results in a differential loss of muscle strength or 'split-hand' phenotype. Importantly, there is also a unique impairment in the coordination of skilled hand tasks that require fractionation of digit movement. Scores on validated tests of skilled hand function could be used to assess disease progression.