OFF-alpha and OFF-beta ganglion cells in cat retina. I: Intracellular electrophysiology and HRP stains

Photopharmacology for vision restoration

Blinding diseases that are caused by degeneration of rod and cone photoreceptor cells often spare the rest of the retinal circuit, from bipolar cells, which are directly innervated by photoreceptor cells, to the output ganglion cells that project axons to the brain. A strategy for restoring vision is to introduce light sensitivity to the surviving cells of the retina. One approach is optogenetics, in which surviving cells are virally transfected with a gene encoding a signaling protein that becomes sensitive to light by binding to the biologically available chromophore retinal, the same chromophore that is used by the opsin photo-detectors of rods and cones. A second approach uses photopharmacology, in which a synthetic photoswitch associates with a native or engineered ion channel or receptor. We review these approaches and look ahead to the next generation of advances that could reconstitute core aspects of natural vision.

Restoration of patterned vision with an engineered photoactivatable G protein-coupled receptor

Retinitis pigmentosa results in blindness due to degeneration of photoreceptors, but spares other retinal cells, leading to the hope that expression of light-activated signaling proteins in the surviving cells could restore vision. We used a retinal G protein-coupled receptor, mGluR2, which we chemically engineered to respond to light. In retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) of blind rd1 mice, photoswitch-charged mGluR2 (“SNAG-mGluR2”) evoked robust OFF responses to light, but not in wild-type retinas, revealing selectivity for RGCs that have lost photoreceptor input. SNAG-mGluR2 enabled animals to discriminate parallel from perpendicular lines and parallel lines at varying spacing. Simultaneous viral delivery of the inhibitory SNAG-mGluR2 and excitatory light-activated ionotropic glutamate receptor LiGluR yielded a distribution of expression ratios, restoration of ON, OFF and ON-OFF light responses and improved visual acuity. Thus, SNAG-mGluR2 restores patterned vision and combinatorial light response diversity provides a new logic for enhanced-acuity retinal prosthetics.

To restore sight after retinal degeneration, one approach is to express light-sensitive proteins in remaining cells. Here the authors combine a light-sensitive engineered G protein-coupled receptor and ion channels to restore ON and OFF responses as well as superior visual pattern discrimination.

Ectopic expression of multiple microbial rhodopsins restores ON and OFF light responses in retinas with photoreceptor degeneration

By expressing channel rhodopsin-2 (ChR2) in inner retinal neurons, previous studies have demonstrated restoration of ON responses in the retina after the death of rod and cone photoreceptors. In this study, we report that the expression of halorhodopsin (HaloR), a light-driven chloride pump, can effectively restore OFF responses in inner retinal neurons of mice with retinal degeneration. We show that HaloR-expressing retinal ganglion cells respond to light with rapid hyperpolarization and suppression of spike activity. After termination of the light stimulus, their membrane potential exhibits a rapid rebound overshoot with robust sustained or transient spike firing. Furthermore, we show that coexpression of ChR2/HaloR in retinal ganglion cells can produce ON, OFF, and even ON-OFF responses, depending on the wavelength of the light stimulus. Our results suggest that the expression of multiple microbial rhodopsins such as ChR2 and HaloR is a possible strategy to restore both ON and OFF light responses in the retina after the death of rod and cone photoreceptors.

Morphology and tracer coupling pattern of alpha ganglion cells in the mouse retina

Alpha cells are a type of ganglion cell whose morphology appears to be conserved across a number of mammalian retinas. In particular, alpha cells display the largest somata and dendritic arbors at a given eccentricity and tile the retina as independent on- (ON) and off-center (OFF) subtypes. Mammalian alpha cells also express a variable tracer coupling pattern, which often includes homologous (same cell type) coupling to a few neighboring alpha cells and extensive heterologous (different cell type) coupling to two to three amacrine cell types. Here, we use the gap junction-permeant tracer Neurobiotin to determine the architecture and coupling pattern of alpha cells in the mouse retina. We find that alpha cells show the same somatic and dendritic architecture described previously in the mammal. However, alpha cells show varied tracer coupling patterns related to their ON and OFF physiologies. ON alpha cells show no evidence of homologous tracer coupling but are coupled heterologously to at least two types of amacrine cell whose somata lie within the ganglion cell layer. In contrast, OFF alpha cells are coupled to one another in circumscribed arrays as well as to two to three types of amacrine cell with somata occupying the inner nuclear layer. We find that homologous coupling between OFF alpha cells is unaltered in the connexin36 (Cx36) knockout (KO) mouse retina, indicating that it is not dependent on Cx36. However, a subset of the heterologous coupling of ON alpha cells and all the heterologous coupling of OFF alpha cells are eliminated in the KO retina, suggesting that Cx36 comprises most of the junctions made with amacrine cells.

Night blindness and abnormal cone electroretinogram ON responses in patients with mutations in the GRM6 gene encoding mGluR6

We report three unrelated patients with mutations in the GRM6 gene that normally encodes the glutamate receptor mGluR6. This neurotransmitter receptor has been shown previously to be present only in the synapses of the ON bipolar cell dendrites, and it mediates synaptic transmission from rod and cone photoreceptors to this type of second-order neuron. Despite the synaptic defect, best visual acuities were normal or only moderately reduced (20/15 to 20/40). The patients were night blind from an early age, and when maximally dark-adapted, they could perceive lights only with an intensity equal to or slightly dimmer than that normally detected by the cone system (i.e., 2-3 log units above normal). Electroretinograms (ERGs) in response to single brief flashes of light had clearly detectable a-waves, which are derived from photoreceptors, and greatly reduced b-waves, which are derived from the second-order inner retinal neurons. ERGs in response to sawtooth flickering light indicated a markedly reduced ON response and a nearly normal OFF response. There was no subjective delay in the perception of suddenly appearing white vs. black objects on a gray background. These patients exemplify a previously unrecognized, autosomal recessive form of congenital night blindness associated with a negative ERG waveform.

The receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells in physiological and pathological states: where we are after half a century of research

Studies on the receptive field properties of cat retinal ganglion cells over the past half-century are reviewed within the context of the role played by the receptive field in visual information processing. Emphasis is placed on the work conducted within the past 20 years, but a summary of key contributions from the 1950s to 1970s is provided. We have sought to review aspects of the ganglion cell receptive field that have not been featured prominently in previous review articles. Our review of the receptive field properties of X- and Y-cells focuses on quantitative studies and includes consideration of the function of the receptive field in visual signal processing. We discuss the non-classical as well as the classical receptive field. Attention is also given to the receptive field properties of the less well-studied cat ganglion cells-the W-cells-and the effect of pathology on cat ganglion cell properties. Although work from our laboratories is highlighted, we hope that we have given a reasonably balanced view of the current state of the field.

Rod pathways: the importance of seeing nothing

Anatomical and physiological studies of the mammalian retina have revealed two primary pathways available for the transmission of rod signals to the ganglion cells: one via ON rod bipolars, amacrine II cells, and ON and OFF cone bipolars, which is exquisitely designed for the transmission of single-photon absorption events; and a second via rod-cone gap junctions, and ON and OFF cone bipolars, which is designed for the transmission of multiple photon-absorption events at higher light levels. Psychophysical and electroretinographic (ERG) studies in normal observers and in two rare types of observer, who are devoid of either rod or cone function, support an analogous duality in the human visual system, the clearest signature of which is a loss of flicker visibility and ERG amplitude at frequencies near 15 Hz that results from destructive interference between sensitive 'slow' and insensitive 'fast' rod signals. The slow rod signal is most probably derived from the ON rod bipolar pathway and the fast signal from the rod-cone gap junction and cone pathways. Evidence has emerged recently for a third, insensitive rod pathway between rods and OFF cone bipolars, but it has so far only been observed clearly in rodents.

A comparison of receptive-field and tracer-coupling size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina

Recent studies have shown that amacrine and ganglion cells in the mammalian retina are extensively coupled as revealed by the intercellular movement of the biotinylated tracers biocytin and Neurobiotin. These demonstrations of tracer coupling suggest that electrical networks formed by proximal neurons (i.e. amacrine and ganglion cells) may underlie the lateral propagation of signals across the inner retina. We studied this question by comparing the receptive-field size, dendritic-field size, and extent of tracer coupling of amacrine and ganglion cells in the dark-adapted, superfused, isolated retina eyecup of the rabbit. Our results indicate that while the center-receptive fields of proximal neurons are approximately 15% larger than their corresponding dendritic diameters, this slight difference can be explained by factors other than electrical coupling such as tissue shrinkage associated with histological processing. However, the extent of tracer coupling of amacrine and ganglion cells was, on average, about twice the size of the corresponding receptive fields. Thus, the receptive field of an individual proximal neuron matched far more closely to its dendritic diameter than to the size of the tracer-coupled network of cells to which it belonged. The exception to this rule was the AII amacrine cells for which center-receptive fields were 2-3 times the size of their dendritic diameters but matched closely to the size of the tracer-coupled arrays. Thus, with the exception of AII cells, our data indicate that tracer coupling between proximal neurons is not associated with an enlargement of their receptive fields. Our results, then, provide no evidence for electrical coupling or, at least, indicate that extensive lateral spread of visual signals does not occur in the proximal mammalian retina.

Alpha ganglion cells of the rabbit retina lose antagonistic surround responses under dark adaptation

Alpha ganglion cells from the midperiphery of the rabbit retina were recorded intracellularly under visual control, in a superfused everted eyecup, and labeled with HRP. Their physiology and large somata with broad dendritic arbors identified them as uniform populations of ON- and OFF-center alpha ganglion cells, which typically displayed transient/sustained light-evoked responses. When dark adapted, the light-evoked responses from both ON- and OFF-center alpha ganglion cells were more sustained than those generally seen under light-adapted conditions. During dark-adapted (scotopic) conditions, stimulation with dim full-field illumination and small spots, either positioned over the soma or displaced 450 microns from the soma, all elicited pure center responses. After light adaptation (photopic conditions), the displaced small spots that previously evoked center responses elicited antagonistic surround responses from both ON- and OFF-center cells. Thus, as originally described in cat retina (Barlow et al., 1957), the receptive-field organization of ganglion cells changed between dark and light adaptation, and an absence or presence of surround antagonism was indicative of scotopic versus photopic states.

Hyperpolarizing, small-field, amacrine cells in cone pathways of cat retina

Intracellular recording and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) staining of amacrine cells in the isolated arterially perfused cat retina have revealed examples of small-field cells that hyperpolarize to light. Two were examined in detailed electron microscopic reconstructions to determine patterns of synaptic relationships within the inner plexiform layer (IPL). The cells were morphologically similar to A8 and A13 types as described in Golgi-impregnated material (Kolb et al. [1981] Vision Res. 21:1081-1114). Both types received ribbon synaptic input from rod and cone bipolar cells. The latter input was numerically predominant, occurred in both a and b sublaminae of the IPL, and arose from at least three cone bipolar types. Reciprocal synapses were evident between A13 cells and cone bipolar cells. Amacrine input occurred throughout the dendritic tree of both A8 and A13 types, and numerically exceeded bipolar cell input for A13. Gap junctions between stained, and similar-appearing unstained dendritic profiles were observed for both amacrine types. In addition, A8 engaged in gap junctions with cone bipolar profiles in sublamina b which also provided ribbon input. Synaptic output for both amacrine types occurred primarily upon amacrine and ganglion cells in sublamina a. Both cells were presynaptic upon single OFF-center beta ganglion cells running through the middle of their dendritic trees. Mixtures of rod and cone signals were found in the centrally evoked hyperpolarizations of each type. Center mechanism space constants of such types ranged from 100 to 400 microns, with antagonistic surround in 1 of 5 cases. Dopamine (250 microM) reduced receptive field space constants by one-third in one case. The synaptic organization and potential circuitry implications of these cone system-dominated amacrine types are compared and contrasted to the better-known AII and A17 types previously described for the rod system.

Two signals in the human rod visual system: a model based on electrophysiological data

In the human rod visual system, self-cancellation of flicker signals is observed at high rod intensity levels near 15 Hz, both perceptually and in the electroetinogram (ERG). This and other evidence suggests that two rod signals are transmitted through the human retina with different speeds of transmission. Here we report a series of flicker ERG recordings from a normal observer and an observer who lacks cone vision. From these results, we propose a quantitative model of the two rod signals, which assumes (1) that the amplitude of the slow signal grows linearly with log intensity but then saturates at approximately 1 scot. td; (2) that the amplitude of the fast signal grows linearly with intensity; (3) that there is a difference in time delay of approximately 33 ms between two rod signals of the same polarity (or of approximately 67 ms if the signals are of inverted polarity); and (4) that the time delay of both signals declines linearly with log intensity (by approximately 10 ms per log scot. td). These simple assumptions provide a remarkably good account of the experimental data. Our results and model are relevant to current anatomical theories of the mammalian rod visual system. We speculate that the slower signal in the human ERG may reflect the transmission of the rod response via the rod bipolars and the AII amacrine cells, while the faster signal may reflect its transmission via the rod-cone gap junctions and the cone bipolars. There are, however, several objections to this simple correspondence.

Conductances evoked by light in the ON-beta ganglion cell of cat retina

When a bar of light (215 x 5000 microns) illuminates the receptive field of an ON-beta ganglion cell of cat retina, the cell depolarizes. Intracellular recording from the cat eyecup preparation shows that this depolarization is due to an increase in conductance (2.4 +/- 0.6 nS). Different phases of this depolarization have different reversal potentials, but all of these reversal potentials are more positive than the cell's resting potential in the dark. When the light is turned on, there is an initial transient depolarization; the reversal potential measured for this transient is positive (23 +/- 11 mV). As the light is left on, the cell partially repolarizes to a sustained depolarization; the reversal potential measured for this sustained depolarization is close to zero (-1 +/- 5 mV). When the light is turned off, the cell repolarizes further; the reversal potential measured for this repolarization is negative (-18 +/- 7 mV), but still above the resting potential in the dark (-50 mV). To explain this variety of reversal potentials, at least two different synaptic conductances are required: one to ions which have a positive reversal potential and another to ions which have a negative reversal potential. Comparing the responses to broad and narrow bars suggests that these two conductances are associated with the center and surround, respectively. Finally, since an ON-beta cell in the area centralis receives about 200 synapses, these results indicate that a single synapse produces an average conductance increase of about 15 pS during a near-maximal depolarization.

OFF-alpha and OFF-beta ganglion cells in cat retina: II. Neural circuitry as revealed by electron microscopy of HRP stains

An OFF-center alpha and an OFF-center beta ganglion cell in cat retina, which had been recorded from and intracellularly stained with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) were examined by serial section electron microscopy. We counted synapses and identified presynaptic neurons to the HRP-stained cells in 20 microns radial slices through the centers of their dendritic trees. Presynaptic amacrine and bipolar cells were identified on cytological criteria known from previous studies. The OFF-beta cell with a 62 microns dendritic arbor, restricted to S1 and S2 (sublamina a) of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), received 38% bipolar and 62% amacrine cell synapses. The bipolar input was from both cb1 and cb2 cone bipolar types. Input from three distinct amacrine cell types occurred upon the dendrites, namely from: (1) AII amacrine lobular appendages, (2) large pale amacrine profiles (possibly A2 or A3 cells), and (3) small, dark amacrine types (possibly A8 cells). Large pale amacrine profiles (possibly A13) were found on the cell body and apical dendrite in sublamina b of the IPL. In addition, several amacrine profiles synapsed directly on the sides and base of the cell body in the ganglion cell layer. We estimate that the complete dendritic tree of this beta cell received about 1,000 synapses contributed by 12-14 bipolar cells, 7-10 AII amacrines and 28-41 other amacrine cells. The OFF-alpha cell had a dendritic tree size of 680 x 920 microns. A 250 microns length of two major dendrites stratifying narrowly in S2 of the IPL was reconstructed. Amacrine cells provided most of the synaptic input (80%). This input came from: (1) AII amacrine lobular appendages, (2) amacrines exhibiting large, pale synaptic profiles (possibly A2 or A3 cells), (3) pale amacrines with large mitochondria and a few neurotubules (unknown type), and (4) densely neurotubule-filled amacrine profiles (possibly A19 cells). A large pale amacrine cell type (possibly A13) provided synaptic input to the cell body as a serial synaptic intermediary with rod bipolar cells. Cone bipolar synapses were from only one type of cone bipolar, the cb2 type and formed 20% of the total synaptic input. We estimate that a minimum of 142 bipolar cells, 256 AII amacrine cells and 1,011 other amacrine cells, altogether providing 6,000-10,000 synapses, converged on the dendritic tree of this OFF-alpha cell.