Representation of the body surface in the gracile, cuneate, and spinal trigeminal nuclei of the little red flying fox (Pteropus scapulatus)

Somatosensory substrates of flight control in bats

Flight maneuvers require rapid sensory integration to generate adaptive motor output. Bats achieve remarkable agility with modified forelimbs that serve as airfoils while retaining capacity for object manipulation. Wing sensory inputs provide behaviorally relevant information to guide flight; however, components of wing sensory-motor circuits have not been analyzed. Here, we elucidate the organization of wing innervation in an insectivore, the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. We demonstrate that wing sensory innervation differs from other vertebrate forelimbs, revealing a peripheral basis for the atypical topographic organization reported for bat somatosensory nuclei. Furthermore, the wing is innervated by an unusual complement of sensory neurons poised to report airflow and touch. Finally, we report that cortical neurons encode tactile and airflow inputs with sparse activity patterns. Together, our findings identify neural substrates of somatosensation in the bat wing and imply that evolutionary pressures giving rise to mammalian flight led to unusual sensorimotor projections.

Organization of the primary somatosensory cortex and wing representation in the Big Brown Bat, Eptesicus fuscus

Bats are the only mammals capable of true powered flight. The bat wing exhibits specializations, allowing these animals to perform complicated flight maneuvers like landing upside-down, and hovering. The wing membrane contains various tactile receptors, including hair-associated Merkel receptors that might be involved in stabilizing bat flight. Here, we studied the neuronal representation of the wing membrane in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of the anesthetized Big Brown Bat, Eptesicus fuscus, using tactile stimulation with calibrated monofilaments (von Frey hairs) while recording from multi-neuron clusters. We also measured cortical response thresholds to tactile stimulation of the wings.The body surface is mapped topographically across the surface of S1, with the head, foot, and wing being overrepresented. The orientation of the wing representation is rotated compared to the hand representaion of terrestrial mammals, confirming results from other bat species. Although different wing membrane parts derive embryologically from different body parts, including the flank (plagiopatagium), the tactile sensitivity of the entire flight membrane (0.2-1.2 mN) is remarkably close or even higher (dactylopatagium) than the average tactile sensitivity of the human fingertip.

Organization of primary afferent projections to the gracile nucleus of the dorsal column system of primates

In order to reveal the somatotopic organization of the gracile nucleus of the dorsal column-trigeminal complex, neuroanatomical tracers were injected subcutaneously into various parts of the hindlimb and tail of prosimian galagos, New World monkeys, and Old World monkeys. In most cases, tracers were injected bilaterally, and into more than one body part. In six cases, two different, distinguishable tracers were injected into the same hindlimb. Brainstem and spinal cord sections were processed for tracers transported by cutaneous afferents to terminations in the gracile nuclei. Foci of terminations were related to the cell-cluster architecture of the gracile nuclei in sections processed for cytochrome oxidase or stained for cell bodies (Nissl stain). In all taxa, terminations labeled by the injections were distributed in a patchy fashion along the rostrocaudal length of the ipsilateral gracile nucleus. Terminations were largely but not completely focused within the cytochrome oxidase dense cell clusters. Across taxa, afferents from the tail, foot, lower leg, and upper leg terminated in a mediolateral sequence within the gracile nucleus. Afferents from the glabrous skin of toes 1-5 terminated in a ventromedial to dorsolateral sequence in owl, squirrel, and macaque monkeys, but an altered arrangement was seen in the galagos, with a ventrolateral location for toe 1. The use of two tracers in squirrel monkeys indicated that terminations from adjacent toes formed adjacent and largely segregated patches. Terminations of afferents from the plantar pad (sole) of the foot tended to surround those from the glabrous toes.

Dynamic representational plasticity in sensory cortex

Studies of the effects of peripheral and central lesions, perceptual learning and neurochemical modification on the sensory representations in cortex have had a dramatic effect in alerting neuroscientists and therapists to the reorganizational capacity of the adult brain. An intriguing aspect of some of these investigations, such as partial peripheral denervation, is the short-term expression of these changes. Indeed, in visual cortex, auditory cortex and somatosensory cortex loss of input from a region of the peripheral receptor epithelium (retinal, basilar and cutaneous, respectively) induces rapid expression of ectopic, or expanded, receptive fields of affected neurons and reorganization of topographic maps to fill in the representation of the denervated area. The extent of these changes can, in some cases, match the maximal extents demonstrated with chronic manipulations. The rapidity, and reversibility, of the effects rules out many possible explanations which involve synaptic plasticity and points to a capacity for representational plasticity being inherent in the circuitry of a topographic pathway. Consequently, topographic representations must be considered as manifestations of physiological interaction rather than as anatomical constructs. Interference with this interaction can produce an unmasking of previously inhibited responsiveness. Consideration of the nature of masking inhibition which is consistent with the precision and order of a topographic representation and which has a capacity for rapid plasticity requires, in addition to stimulus-driven inhibition, a source of tonic input from the periphery. Such input, acting locally to provide tonic inhibition, has been directly demonstrated in the somatosensory system and is consistent with results obtained in auditory and visual systems.

Cutaneous representations of the hand and other body parts in the cuneate nucleus of a primate, and some relationships to previously described cortical representations

Dynamic properties of primate somatosensory maps are dependent on normal central adjacencies of cutaneous representations. The cuneate nucleus is an important brainstem processing center of cutaneous information. Surprisingly, there are no descriptions of functional representations of the skin in the primate cuneate nucleus; as a result, the relationships of functional representations at the brainstem level and other levels of the somatosensory neuraxis remain obscure. The present neurophysiological study indicates that the main cuneate nucleus of marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) contains organized representations of cutaneous inputs from the hand, forelimb, and adjacent body between the lateral face and proximal hindlimb. Inputs from the glabrous hand are represented continuously across transverse planes in the cuneate, whereas inputs from the hairy hand are represented discontinuously. Inputs from distal to proximal, and radial to ulnar, parts of the hand are mapped in an organized manner. At rostrocaudal levels where the cuneate nucleus is near its largest transverse area, the map of the hand is about 2600 times smaller than the hand skin area it represents. Cuneate representations of the forelimb and trunk are represented both medial and lateral to the hand representation, and interface with representations in the adjacent gracile and trigeminal nuclei. These findings provide a starting point for understanding functional representations of the skin in the cuneate nucleus of primates. Furthermore, they provide a basis for understanding relationships of cutaneous representations at different levels of the neuraxis. In this regard, comparisons of the present results to previously defined representations in the somatosensory (area 3b) cortex indicate that cuneate hand representations are several times smaller than cortical representations, and that there are similarities and differences in adjacencies of cuneate and cortical representations.