Brainstem afferents to the lateral mesencephalic tegmental region of the cat

The nucleus prepositus predominantly outputs eye movement-related information during passive and active self-motion

Maintaining a constant representation of our heading as we move through the world requires the accurate estimate of spatial orientation. As one turns (or is turned) toward a new heading, signals from the semicircular canals are relayed through the vestibular system to higher-order centers that encode head direction. To date, there is no direct electrophysiological evidence confirming the first relay point of head-motion signals from the vestibular nuclei, but previous anatomical and lesion studies have identified the nucleus prepositus as a likely candidate. Whereas burst-tonic neurons encode only eye-movement signals during head-fixed eye motion and passive vestibular stimulation, these neurons have not been studied during self-generated movements. Here, we specifically address whether burst-tonic neurons encode head motion during active behaviors. Single-unit responses were recorded from the nucleus prepositus of rhesus monkeys and compared for head-restrained and active conditions with comparable eye velocities. We found that neurons consistently encoded eye position and velocity across conditions but did not exhibit significant sensitivity to head position or velocity. Additionally, response sensitivities varied as a function of eye velocity, similar to abducens motoneurons and consistent with their role in gaze control and stabilization. Thus our results demonstrate that the primate nucleus prepositus chiefly encodes eye movement even during active head-movement behaviors, a finding inconsistent with the proposal that this nucleus makes a direct contribution to head-direction cell tuning. Given its ascending projections, however, we speculate that this eye-movement information is integrated with other inputs in establishing higher-order spatial representations.

Afferent and efferent connections of the mesencephalic reticular formation in goldfish

The physiology of the mesencephalic reticular formation (MRF) in goldfish suggests its contribution to eye and body movements, but the afferent and efferent connections underlying such movements have not been determined. Therefore, we injected the bidirectional tracer biotinylated dextran amine into functionally identified MRF sites. We found retrogradely labelled neurons and anterogradely labelled boutons within nuclei of the following brain regions: (1) the telencephalon: a weak and reciprocal connectivity was confined to the central zone of area dorsalis and ventral nucleus of area ventralis; (2) the diencephalon: reciprocal connections were abundant in the ventral and dorsal thalamic nuclei; the central pretectal nucleus was also reciprocally wired with the MRF, but only boutons were present in the superficial pretectal nucleus; the preoptic and suprachiasmatic nuclei showed abundant neurons and boutons; the MRF was reciprocally connected with the preglomerular complex and the anterior tuberal nucleus; (3) the mesencephalon: neurons and boutons were abundant within deep tectal layers; reciprocal connections were also present within the torus semicircularis and the contralateral MRF; neurons were abundant within the nucleus isthmi; and (4) the rhombencephalon: the superior and middle parts of the reticular formation received strong projections from the MRF, while the projection to the inferior area was weaker; sparse neurons were present throughout the reticular formation; a reciprocal connectivity was observed with the sensory trigeminal nucleus; the medial and magnocellular nuclei of the octaval column projected to the MRF. These results support the participation of the MRF in the orienting response. The MRF could also be involved in other motor tasks triggered by visual, auditory, vestibular, or somatosensory signals.

Nucleus prepositus

The cytoarchitecture and the histochemistry of nucleus prepositus hypoglossi and its afferent and efferent connections to oculomotor structures are described. The functional significance of the afferent connections of the nucleus is discussed in terms of current knowledge of the firing behavior of prepositus neurons in alert animals. The efferent connections of the nucleus and the results of lesion experiments suggest that it plays a role in a variety of functions related to the control of gaze.

Echolocation calls and communication calls are controlled differentially in the brainstem of the bat Phyllostomus discolor

BACKGROUND

Echolocating bats emit vocalizations that can be classified either as echolocation calls or communication calls. Neural control of both types of calls must govern the same pool of motoneurons responsible for vocalizations. Electrical microstimulation in the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) elicits both communication and echolocation calls, whereas stimulation of the paralemniscal area (PLA) induces only echolocation calls. In both the PAG and the PLA, the current thresholds for triggering natural vocalizations do not habituate to stimuli and remain low even for long stimulation periods, indicating that these structures have relative direct access to the final common pathway for vocalization. This study intended to clarify whether echolocation calls and communication calls are controlled differentially below the level of the PAG via separate vocal pathways before converging on the motoneurons used in vocalization.

RESULTS

Both structures were probed simultaneously in a single experimental approach. Two stimulation electrodes were chronically implanted within the PAG in order to elicit either echolocation or communication calls. Blockade of the ipsilateral PLA site with iontophoretically application of the glutamate antagonist kynurenic acid did not impede either echolocation or communication calls elicited from the PAG. However, blockade of the contralateral PLA suppresses PAG-elicited echolocation calls but not communication calls. In both cases the blockade was reversible.

CONCLUSION

The neural control of echolocation and communication calls seems to be differentially organized below the level of the PAG. The PLA is an essential functional unit for echolocation call control before the descending pathways share again the final common pathway for vocalization.

Significance of the paralemniscal tegmental area for audio-motor control in the moustached bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii: the afferent off efferent connections of the paralemniscal area

The paralemniscal tegmental area has been determined in the brain of the New World moustached bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii, by electrical microstimulation eliciting echolocation calls and pinna movements. It is located in the dorsal tegmentum rostral and medial to the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and is characterized by medium sized and large neurons. Tracer injections (WGA-HRP) showed that the most intense input to the paralemniscal tegmental area originates in the intermediate and deep layers of the homolateral superior colliculus. The strong projections from the ipsi- and contralateral nucleus praepositus hypoglossus most probably contributes vestibular information. Further inputs in descending order of intensity are from the substantia nigra, the contralateral paralemniscal tegmental area, the putamen, the ventral reticular formation in its lateral portions, the medial cerebellar nucleus and the dorsal reticular formation. Efferent projections of the paralemniscal tegmental area reach the putamen bilaterally, the nucleus accumbens and other parts of the basal ganglia, the pretectal area, the substantia nigra, the intermediate and deep layers of the superior colliculus bilaterally and the tegmental area ventral to it. Connections to the dorsal part of the periaqueductal grey, the cuneiform nucleus and the parabrachial region are important in the context of vocal control, whereas projections to the medial portion of the contralateral facial nucleus may interfere with the control of pinna movement. The findings suggest that the paralemniscal tegmental area is involved in audio-motor control of vocalization and pinna movements in bats; connectional and functional similarities and disparities to tegmental regions described in other mammals are discussed.