Projection of individual axons from the pretectum to the dorsal lateral geniculate complex in the cat

Morphology of visual sector thalamic reticular neurons in the macaque monkey suggests retinotopically specialized, parallel stream-mixed input to the lateral geniculate nucleus

The thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) is a unique brain structure at the interface between the thalamus and the cortex. Because the TRN receives bottom-up sensory input and top-down cortical input, it could serve as an integration hub for sensory and cognitive signals. Functional evidence supports broad roles for the TRN in arousal, attention, and sensory selection. How specific circuits connecting the TRN with sensory thalamic structures implement these functions is not known. The structural organization and function of the TRN is particularly interesting in the context of highly organized sensory systems, such as the primate visual system, where neurons in the retina and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus (dLGN) are morphologically and physiologically distinct and also specialized for processing particular features of the visual environment. To gain insight into the functional relationship between the visual sector of the TRN and the dLGN, we reconstructed a large number of TRN neurons that were retrogradely labeled following injections of rabies virus expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) into the dLGN. An independent cluster analysis, based on 10 morphological metrics measured for each reconstructed neuron, revealed three clusters of TRN neurons that differed in cell body shape and size, dendritic arborization patterns, and medial-lateral position within the TRN. TRN dendritic and axonal morphologies are inconsistent with visual stream-specific projections to the dLGN. Instead, TRN neuronal organization could facilitate transmission of global arousal and/or cognitive signals to the dLGN with retinotopic precision that preserves specialized processing of foveal versus peripheral visual information. J. Comp. Neurol. 525:1273-1290, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The pretectum: connections and oculomotor-related roles

Research over the past two decades in mammals, especially primates, has greatly improved our understanding of the afferent and efferent connections of two retinorecipient pretectal nuclei, the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) and the pretectal olivary nucleus (PON). Functional studies of these two nuclei have further elucidated some of the roles that they play both in oculomotor control and in relaying oculomotor-related signals to visual relay nuclei. Therefore, following a brief overview of the anatomy and retinal projections to the entire mammalian pretectum, the connections and potential roles of the NOT and the PON are considered in detail. Data on the specific connections of the NOT are combined with data from single-unit recording, microstimulation, and lesion studies to show that this nucleus plays critical roles in optokinetic nystagmus, short-latency ocular following, smooth pursuit eye movements, and adaptation of the gain of the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex. Comparable data for the PON show that this nucleus plays critical roles in the pupillary light reflex, light-evoked blinks, rapid eye movement sleep triggering, and modulating subcortical nuclei involved in circadian rhythms.

Ultrastructural analysis of projections to the pulvinar nucleus of the cat. II: Pretectum

The pretectum (PT) can supply the pulvinar nucleus (PUL), and concomitantly the cortex, with visual motion information through its dense projections to the PUL. We examined the morphology and synaptic targets of pretecto-pulvinar (PT-PUL) terminals labeled by anterograde transport in the cat. By using postembedding immunocytochemical staining for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), we additionally determined whether PT-PUL terminals or their postsynaptic targets were GABAergic. We found that the main projection from the PT to the PUL is an ipsilateral, non-GABAergic projection (72.4%) that primarily contacts thalamocortical cell dendrites (87.6%), and also the dendritic terminals of interneurons (F2 profiles; 12.4%). The PT additionally provides GABAergic innervation to the PUL (27.6% of the ipsilateral projection), which chiefly contacts relay cell dendrites (84.6%) but also GABAergic profiles (15.4%). These GABAergic pretectal terminals are smaller, beaded fibers that likely branch to bilaterally innervate the PUL and dLGN, and possibly other targets. We also examined the neurochemical nature of PT-PUL cells labeled by retrograde transport and found that most are non-GABAergic cells (79%) and devoid of calbindin. Taking existing physiological and our present morphological data into account, we suggest that, in addition to the parietal cortex, the non-GABAergic PT-PUL projection may also strongly influence PUL activity. The GABAergic pretectal fibers, however, may provide a more widespread influence on thalamic activity.

Pretectal and tectal afferents to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the turtle: An electron microscopic axon tracing and γ-aminobutyric acid immunocytochemical study

The pretectal and tectal projections to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (GLd) of two species of turtle (Emys orbicularis and Testudo horsfieldi) were examined under the electron microscope by using axonal tracing techniques (horseradish peroxidase or biotinylated dextran amine) and postembedding gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) immunocytochemistry. After injection of tracer into the pretectum, two types of axon terminals were identified as those of pretectogeniculate pathways. Both contained pleomorphic synaptic vesicles and were more numerous in the inner part of the nucleus. They could be distinguished on the bases of size and shape of their synaptic vesicles, type of synaptic contact, and level of GABA immunoreactivity. One type had a higher density of immunolabeling and established symmetric synaptic contacts, whereas the other, less densely immunolabeled, made asymmetric synaptic contacts. In both cases, synaptic contacts were mainly with relay cells and occasionally with interneurons. We suggest that these two types of pretectogeniculate terminals originate in two separate pretectal nuclei. After injection of tracer into the optic tectum, a single population of GABA-immunonegative tracer-labeled terminals was identified as belonging to the tectogeniculate pathway. These were small, had smooth contours, contained very small round synaptic vesicles, and established asymmetric synaptic contacts with long active zones, predominantly with relay cells and less frequently with interneurons, in the inner part of the nucleus. In addition, a population of GABA-negative and occasionally GABA-positive terminals, labeled by tracer injected into either the pretectum or the tectum, was identified as retinal terminals; these were presumably labeled by the retrograde transport of tracer in collateral branches of visual fibers innervating both the GLd and the pretectum or tectum. Comparison of the present ultrastructural findings in turtles with those previously reported in mammals shows that the cytological features, synaptic morphology, and immunochemical properties of the pretectogeniculate and tectogeniculate terminals of both groups share many similarities. Nevertheless, the postsynaptic targets of these two categories of terminals display some pronounced differences between the two groups, which are discussed in terms of their possible functional significance.

Pretectotectal pathway: an ultrastructural quantitative analysis in cats

Both the pretectum (PT) and the superior colliculus (SC) play an important role in directing eye movements and in sensorimotor coupling. A reciprocal connection between the PT and the SC has been described, which suggests a strong interplay between these two structures. We injected the cat SC with retrograde tracers and examined the labeled pretectotectal (PTT) cells at the light and electron microscopic level. PTT cells were distributed mostly in the nucleus of the optic tract and 93.1% contained gamma amino butyric acid (GABA). We also observed that PTT cells are located outside of pretectal regions distinguished by dense retinal terminals and clusters of cells that contain calbindin. This suggests that the GABAergic PTT cells are distinct from the GABAergic pretectogeniculate cells that have been previously described as being distributed within these regions. Finally, to determine the synaptic targets of PTT terminals, we injected the PT with anterograde tracers and examined terminals labeled in the SC at the ultrastructural level. The labeled PTT terminals were beaded fibers that were distributed mainly within the stratum griseum superficiale (SGS) of the SC. Using postembedding immunocytochemistry, 94.5% were found to be GABAergic. The PTT terminals were mostly small in size and primarily contacted GABA-negative dendrites (88.1%) and in some cases somata (4.7%). The remainder terminated on GABAergic dendrites (7.2%). Our results suggest that the PTT cells constitute a separate population of GABAergic efferent cells in the PT, which may function to inhibit the activity of non-GABAergic SC efferent cells in the SGS.

GABAergic pretectal terminals contact GABAergic interneurons in the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus

Anterograde tracing techniques combined with postembedding immunocytochemical staining were used to determine the gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) content of pretectogeniculate (PT-LGN) terminals and their postsynaptic targets. The results provide evidence that PT-LGN terminals are GABAergic and that they contact GABAergic interneurons. These results corroborate previous anatomical studies and support the idea that the PT-LGN projection functions to disinhibit thalamocortical cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.

Y retinal terminals contact interneurons in the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus

One of the largest influences on dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) activity comes from interneurons, which use the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). It is well established that X retinogeniculate terminals contact interneurons and thalamocortical cells in complex synaptic arrangements known as glomeruli. However, there is little anatomical evidence for the involvement of dLGN interneurons in the Y pathway. To determine whether Y retinogeniculate axons contact interneurons, we injected the superior colliculus (SC) with biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) to backfill retinal axons, which also project to the SC. Within the A lamina of the dLGN, this BDA labeling allowed us to distinguish Y retinogeniculate axons from X retinogeniculate axons, which do not project to the SC. In BDA-labeled tissue prepared for electron microscopic analysis, we subsequently used postembedding immunocytochemical staining for GABA to distinguish interneurons from thalamocortical cells. We found that the majority of profiles postsynaptic to Y retinal axons were GABA-negative dendrites of thalamocortical cells (117/200 or 58.5%). The remainder (83/200 or 41.5%) were GABA-positive dendrites, many of which contained vesicles (59/200 or 29.5%). Thus, Y retinogeniculate axons do contact interneurons. However, these contacts differed from X retinogeniculate axons, in that triadic arrangements were rare. This indicates that the X and Y pathways participate in unique circuitries but that interneurons are involved in the modulation of both pathways.

Pretectal connections in turtles with special reference to the visual thalamic centers: a hodological and gamma-aminobutyric acid-immunohistochemical study

Projections of the pretectal region to forebrain and midbrain structures were examined in two species of turtles (Testudo horsfieldi and Emys orbicularis) by axonal tracing and immunocytochemical methods. Two ascending gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic pathways to thalamic visual centers were revealed: a weak projection from the retinorecipient nucleus lentiformis mesencephali to the ipsilateral nucleus geniculatus lateralis pars dorsalis and a considerably stronger projection from the nonretinorecipient nucleus pretectalis ventralis to the nucleus rotundus. The latter is primarily ipsilateral, with a weak contralateral component. The interstitial nucleus of the tectothalamic tract is also involved in reciprocal projections of the pretectum and nucleus rotundus. In addition, the pretectal nuclei project reciprocally to the optic tectum and possibly to the telencephalic isocortical homologues. Comparison of these findings with previous work on other species reveals striking similarities between the pretectorotundal pathway in turtles and birds and in the pretectogeniculate pathway in turtles, birds, and mammals.

Neurotransmitters contained in the subcortical extraretinal inputs to the monkey lateral geniculate nucleus

The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) is the thalamic relay of retinal information to cortex. An extensive complement of nonretinal inputs to the LGN combine to modulate the responsiveness of relay cells to their retinal inputs, and thus control the transfer of visual information to cortex. These inputs have been studied in the most detail in the cat. The goal of the present study was to determine whether the neurotransmitters used by nonretinal afferents to the monkey LGN are similar to those identified in the cat. By combining the retrograde transport of tracers injected into the monkey LGN with immunocytochemical labeling for choline acetyl transferase, brain nitric oxide synthase, glutamic acid decarboxylase, tyrosine hydroxylase, or the histochemical nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-diaphorase reaction, we determined that the organization of neurotransmitter inputs to the monkey LGN is strikingly similar to the patterns occurring in the cat. In particular, we found that the monkey LGN receives a significant cholinergic/nitrergic projection from the pedunculopontine tegmentum, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic projections from the thalamic reticular nucleus and pretectum, and a cholinergic projection from the parabigeminal nucleus. The major difference between the innervation of the LGN in the cat and the monkey is the absence of a noradrenergic projection to the monkey LGN. The segregation of the noradrenergic cells and cholinergic cells in the monkey brainstem also differs from the intermingled arrangement found in the cat brainstem. Our findings suggest that studies of basic mechanisms underlying the control of visual information flow through the LGN of the cat may relate directly to similar issues in primates, and ultimately, humans.

Stimulus frequency affects c-fos expression in the rat visual system

We have characterised the c-fos expression patterns in various centers of the visual pathway of adult rats monocularly stimulated either by continuous or flickering light at different frequencies. Results show different immunocytochemical patterns in all centers studied, the geniculate lateral complex (LGC), superior colliculus (SC) and primary visual cortex (Oc1), depending on the physical characteristics of the stimulus (blinking frequency and light wavelength). After stimulation of the left eye, the ipsilateral pathway presents a substantial density of immunoresponsive cells, which is greater than expected with respect to the number of fibers that project ipsilaterally from the retina to the LGC and the superficial layers of the SC. A surprisingly high positive immunoresponsiveness is obtained in all cases with coherent light stimulation in the red spectrum (634 nm).

Synaptic targets of cholinergic terminals in the cat lateral posterior nucleus

We examined profiles in the neuropil of the lateral division of the lateral posterior (LP) nucleus of the cat stained with antibodies against choline acetyl transferase (ChAT) or gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and several differences in the synaptic circuitry of the lateral LP nucleus compared with the pulvinar nucleus and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were identified. In the lateral LP nucleus, there are fewer glomerular arrangements, fewer GABAergic terminals, and fewer cholinergic terminals. Correspondingly, the neuropil of the lateral LP nucleus appears to be composed of a higher percentage of small type I cortical terminals (RS profiles). Similar to the pulvinar nucleus and the LGN, the cholinergic terminals present in the lateral LP nucleus contact both GABA-negative profiles (thalamocortical cells; 74%) and GABA-positive profiles (interneurons; 26%). However, in contrast to the pulvinar nucleus and the LGN, the majority of cholinergic terminals in the lateral LP nucleus contact small-caliber dendritic shafts outside of glomeruli (60 of 82; 73%). Consequently, most cholinergic terminals are in close proximity to RS profiles. Therefore, whereas the cholinergic input to the LGN and pulvinar nucleus appears to be positioned to selectively influence the response of thalamocortical cells to terminals that innervate glomeruli (retinal terminals or large type II cortical terminals), the cholinergic input to the lateral LP nucleus may function primarily in the modulation of responses to terminals that innervate distal dendrites (small type I cortical terminals).