A retrospective analysis of discharge summaries from a tertiary care hospital medical oncology unit: To assess compliance with documentation of recommended discharge summary components

[Quality of medication documentation in patientś discharge summaries after implementing new legal requirements]

INTRODUCTION

Discharge from hospital is a risk to drug continuity and medication safety. In Germany, new legal requirements concerning the management of patient discharge from the hospital came into force in 2017. They set minimum requirements for the documentation of medications in patient discharge summaries, which are the primary means of communication at transitions of care. Six years later, data on their practical implementation in routine care are lacking.

METHODS

Within the scope of an explorative retrospective observational study, the minimum requirements were operationalized and a second set of assessment criteria was derived from the recommendation "Good Prescribing Practice in Drug Therapy" published by the Aktionsbündnis Patientensicherheit e.V. as a comparative quality standard. A sample of discharge summaries was drawn from routine care at the University Hospital Heidelberg and assessed according to their fulfilment of the criteria sets. In addition, the potential influence of certain context factors (e. g., involvement of clinical pharmacists or software usage) was evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 11 quality criteria were derived from the minimum requirements. According to the eligibility criteria (i. e., three or more discharge medications) 352 discharge summaries (42 wards; issued in May-July 2021), containing in total 3,051 medications, were included. The practical implementation of the minimum requirements for documenting medications in patient discharge summaries differed considerably depending on the criterion and defined context factors. Core elements (i. e., drug name, strength, and dosage at discharge) were fulfilled in 82.8 %, while further minimum requirements were rarely met or completely lacking (e. g., explanations for special pharmaceutical forms). Involvement of clinical pharmacists and usage of software were shown to be a facilitator of documentation quality, while on-demand medication (compared to long-term medication) as well as newly prescribed medication (compared to home medication or medication changed during hospitalisation) showed poorer documentation quality. In addition, the documentation quality seemed to depend on the department and the day of discharge.

CONCLUSION

To date, the wording of the German legal requirements allows for different interpretations without considering the respective clinical setting and the medication actually prescribed. For future clarification of the requirements, implications of the wording for the clinical setting should be considered.

Nurses engaging with referral letters and discharge summaries: A qualitative study

AIMS

To investigate the ways that nurses engage with referral letters and discharge summaries, and the qualities of these documents they find valuable for safe and effective practice.

DESIGN

This study comprised a qualitative, case-study design within a constructivist paradigm using convenience sampling.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted with nurses to investigate their practices relating to referral letters and discharge summaries. Data collection also involved nurses' examination and evaluation of a diverse range of 10 referral letters and discharge summaries from medical records at two Australian hospitals through focus-group sessions. The data were transcribed and analysed inductively.

RESULTS

In all, 67 nurses participated in interviews or focus groups. Nurses indicated they used referral letters and discharge summaries to inform their work when caring for patients at different times throughout their hospitalisation. These documents assisted them with verbal handovers, to enable them to educate patients about their condition and treatment and to provide a high standard of care. The qualities of referral letters and discharge summaries that they most valued were language and communication, an awareness of audience and clinical knowledge, as well as balancing conciseness with comprehensiveness of information.

CONCLUSION

Nurses relied on referral letters and discharge summaries to ensure safe and effective patient care. They used these documents to enhance their verbal handovers, contribute to patient care and to educate the patient about their condition and treatment. They identified several qualities of these documents that assisted them in maintaining patient safety including clarity and conciseness of information.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

It is important that referral letters and discharge summaries are written clearly, concisely and comprehensively because nurses use them as key sources of evidence in planning and delivering care, and in communicating with other health professionals in relaying goals of care and implementing treatment plans.

IMPACT

Nurses reported that they regularly used referral letters and discharge summaries as valuable sources of evidence throughout their patients' hospitalisation. The qualities of these documents which they most valued were language and communication styles, awareness of audience and clinical knowledge, as well as balancing conciseness with comprehensiveness of information. This research has important impact on the patient experience in relation to encouraging effective referral letter and discharge summary writing.

REPORTING METHOD

We have adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines through the SRQR reporting method.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Improving the Quality and Completeness of Discharge Summaries at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction Discharge summaries (DS) allow continued patient care after being discharged from the hospital. Only a few quality improvement projects (QIPs) focused on assessing and improving the quality and completeness of DS at tertiary care hospitals have been undertaken in Pakistan. This QIP aimed to evaluate and enhance the quality and completeness of DS at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan to facilitate seamless healthcare transitions. Methods A QIP was conducted in the medical unit of a tertiary care hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The DS were assessed using the e-discharge summary self-assessment checklist devised by the Royal College of Physicians (RCP). This QIP was done by the plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycle. The PDSA cycle comprised two audit cycles and an intervention in between them. The first audit cycle (AC) was conducted on 150 DS. Its duration was from March 2023 to June 2023. An educational workshop was conducted before the re-audit cycle (RAC) to address deficiencies and reinforce the implementation of the guidelines provided by the RCP. The RAC was conducted from June 2023 to August 2023. 100 DS were studied and analyzed to assess for improvement in the completeness of DS. Frequencies and percentages were calculated in each audit cycle. The Chi-squared test was applied to compare the statistical difference between the results of both audit cycles. Results A total of 150 DS were analyzed in the first AC and 100 DS in the RAC. The results of the first AC show that the details of any allergies were recorded only in 3% of the DS; this percentage significantly improved to 51% after the RAC (p-value <0.05). Relevant past medical history was included in 52% and 88% of the DS during the first AC and RAC, respectively (p-value <0.05). Secondary diagnoses were written in 54% and 71% of the DS during the first AC and RAC, respectively (p-value <0.05). Details of relevant investigations were included in 60% and 88% of the DS during the first AC and RAC, respectively (p-value <0.05). The post-discharge management plan was written in 90% and 98% of the DS during the first AC and RAC, respectively (p-value <0.05). The follow-up plan was written clearly in 65% and 93% of the DS during the first AC and RAC, respectively (p-value <0.05).  Conclusion The DS was found to be incomplete after analyzing the results of the first AC. The details related to allergies, medications, operations, and procedures were found to be missing in the majority of the cases. No mention of the patient's concerns or expectations was made in the DS. The results of the RAC showed improvement in the level of completeness of DS. The majority of the weak points observed after the first AC seemed to have improved after the RAC, which shows that intervention proved to be quite effective in improving the completeness and quality of DS. The RAC showed significant improvement in the completeness of the details relating to investigations, allergies, past medical history, secondary diagnoses, and the post-discharge follow-up plan. QIP must be routinely carried out to assess and improve the completeness and quality of DS at hospitals.

Evaluating an implementation of the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in the inclusion of pertinent information on electronic discharge summaries (eDS) after implementation of a revised template and electronic medical record (EMR) workflow. Methods A retrospective medical record audit of eDS at three metropolitan hospitals was undertaken for adult inpatient encounters in June 2021 (pre-intervention, n  = 100) and June 2022 (post-intervention, n  = 100). The eDS were evaluated against 16 components listed in the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries. Nine components were further broken down to between two and 11 sub-components. Sub-analysis compared a hospital with full EMR to pooled results from hospitals with hybrid EMRs. Components and sub-components were evaluated for inclusion only; accuracy or relevance of the information was not assessed. Results Inclusion of three out of 16 components (presentation details: 47% vs 62%, problems and diagnosis: 61% vs 86% and recipient details: 82% vs 93%) and eight out of 36 sub-components (discharge destination, principal diagnosis, history of presenting complaint, infection risk, pressure injury, screening and/or diagnosis of delirium and GP phone number and address) was higher in the post-intervention group (all P  < 0.05). Reduced eDS information inclusion in the post-intervention group was observed for discharge date and falls risk only (both P  < 0.05). Reporting of falls history decreased at the hospital with full EMR (71% vs 20% P  < 0.001) but not at hospitals utilising hybrid EMRs (24% vs 30% P  = 0.5). Conclusion The intervention was associated with improved inclusion of pertinent information as described in the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries.

The Quality of Discharge Summaries at Al-Shaab Hospital, Sudan, in 2022: The First Cycle of a Clinical Audit

Background The discharge summary is a vital component of the modern health system. It is defined as a synopsis of information regarding events occurring during the inpatient care of a patient, to allow for a safe, quick, and effective patient-centered discharge process. It contains important information about the patient's hospital stay, including the reason for admission, treatment received, and follow-up needed. Low-quality discharge summaries pose a great risk to patient healthcare since the most frequent reason for error in clinical settings is poor communication. In the United Kingdom, the Professional Record Standards Body (PRSB) has adopted the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) "Standards for the Clinical Structure and Content of Patient Records" and produced a standard discharge summary form. This study aimed to assess the quality of discharge summaries at Al-Shaab Hospital in Sudan in terms of information, filling adequacy, and adherence to international guidelines and evaluate the discharge interviews. Methods A cross-sectional institution-based study was conducted in the period of September to December 2022 at Al-Shaab Teaching Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. Systematic random sampling was used to select the study participants from the discharged patients. A total of 70 patients were met in their wards over a period of two months, and the contents of their discharge cards were compared to items on an online checklist based on the Professional Record Standards Body (PRSB) and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) standard discharge summary. The patients were also interviewed to assess their knowledge regarding their discharge information. Results The hospital's discharge summary form contained only four headings: date, patient name, age, and ID number. The assessed cards were found to be missing valuable information, including date of admission (missing in 83%), filling doctor's name (missing in 71%), and medication changes (missing in 70%). Only half of the summaries were clearly readable. The majority of patients had poor knowledge regarding their medication side effects (89%) and how to act in an emergency (86%), while knowledge of medication doses and follow-up details was good in 80% and 66%, respectively. Conclusion The patients are discharged with inadequately filled discharge forms. This may be due to the poor design of the form, so a newly designed form will be proposed, based on international standards. The discharge interview is also in need of improvement, to make sure patients are fully aware of their condition.