Early oral intake and early removal of nasogastric tube post-esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of nasogastric tube exclusion after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective study in India

Purpose

This study examines the impacts of omitting nasogastric tube (NGT) placement following cervical esophagogastric anastomosis (CEGA) in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, comparing outcomes to those from early NGT removal.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort of esophagectomy patients treated for esophageal cancer, participants were divided into two groups: group 1 had the NGT inserted post-CEGA and removed by postoperative day 3, while group 2 underwent the procedure without NGT placement. We primarily investigated anastomotic leak rates, also analyzing hospital stay duration, pulmonary complications, and NGT reinsertion.

Results

Among 50 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, 30 in group I were compared with 20 in group II. The baseline demographic and tumor characteristics were similar between both groups. The overall incidence of anastomotic leak was 14.0%, comparable in both groups (16.7% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.63). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the no NGT group (median of 7 days vs. 6 days, p = 0.03) with similar major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa; 13.3% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.63). There was no 30-day mortality, and one patient in each group had reinsertion of NGT for conduit dilatation.

Conclusion

The exclusion of an NGT across CEGA after esophagectomy did not influence the anastomotic leak rate with comparable complications and a shorter hospital stay.

Effect of modified endotracheal intubation protocol combined with early oral intake on postoperative recovery quality in thyroid and parathyroid surgery at a tertiary hospital in China: a 2x2 factorial randomised controlled trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Early oral intake (EOI) is supposed to be safe and beneficial to patients' recovery. However, the optimal timing of resuming oral intake has not been validated in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. On the other hand, a modified electromyography (EMG) endotracheal intubation protocol with real-time EMG monitoring during video laryngoscope/fibrescope-guided intubation was presented in 2022, which was regarded as an effective way to shorten the intubation time. We aimed to use Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire to compare the efficacy and safety of different EMG endotracheal intubation protocols combined with different postoperative oral intake strategy in thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This prospective, single-centre, 2×2 factorial, randomised controlled trial will be conducted in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), China. We plan to recruit 200 adult patients who will receive thyroid or parathyroid surgery under intraoperative nerve monitoring. Eligible patients will be randomly divided into two groups, which will receive either the modified intubation protocol (M group) or conventional intubation process (C group). After patients enter postanaesthesia care unit and Steward scores ≥4, they will be randomly divided into two groups again, which will receive early resumption of oral intake (E group) or delayed resumption of oral intake (D group). Patients will be followed up during hospitalisation and the QoR-15 questionnaire will be administered to compare the quality of recovery on the day before surgery (T0), the first day after surgery (T1) and the day of discharge (T2). The primary outcome is the QoR-15 scores at T1.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (IRB K-2501). All participants will give written informed consent before participation. The results from this study will be shared at conferences and disseminated in international journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05624463.

Esophagectomy-prevention of complications-tips and tricks for the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stage

Esophagectomy still remains the mainstay of treatment for localized esophageal cancer. Many progresses have been made in the technique of esophagectomy in the last decades but the overall morbidity for this operation remains formidable. Postoperative complication and mortality rate after esophagectomy are significant; anastomotic leak has an incidence of 11,4%. The occurrence of a complication is a significant negative prognostic factor for long term survival and is also linked to longer postoperative stay, a lower quality of life, increased hospital costs. Preventing the occurrence of postoperative morbidity and reducing associated postoperative mortality rate is a major goal for surgeons experienced in resective esophageal surgery. Many details of pre, intra and postoperative care for patients undergoing esophagectomy need to be shared among the professionals taking care of these patients (oncologists, dieticians, physiotherapists, surgeons, nurses, anesthesiologists, gastroenterologists) in order to improve the short and long term clinical results.

Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is the standard of care in many hospitals after esophagectomy for gastric conduit decompression. An upper gastrointestinal contrast passage evaluation (UGI-CE) is a diagnostic test to evaluate passage through the gastric conduit. The authors hypothesized that introducing routine UGI-CE after esophagectomy results in earlier removal of the NGT and resumption of oral intake.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated two consecutive series of patients undergoing esophagectomy, one before (control group) and one after the introduction of a routine UGI-CE on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4 (UGI-CE group). If contrast passage was found on the UGI-CE, the NGT was capped and removed. In the control group, the NGT was routinely capped and removed on day 5 after surgery. The primary outcome was the POD on which oral diet was initiated. The secondary outcomes were the day of NGT removal, NGT reinsertions, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Each cohort included 74 patients. In the UGI-CE group, the contrast test was performed on median POD 3.5 (IQR, 3-4). The median day of NGT removal, initiation of clear liquids, and full liquid and solid intake was 1 to 2 days earlier in the UGI-CE group than in the control group (i.e. POD 4, 4, 5, and 6 vs. POD 5, 5, 6.5, and 8; all p < 0.001). The study found no significant differences in NGT reinsertions, pneumonias, anastomotic leakages, or hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of a UGI-CE after esophagectomy led to earlier removal of the NGT and earlier resumption of oral intake.