Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a new testosterone gel formulation in comparison to Testogel® in healthy men

The Potential of Pharmaceutical Hydrogels in the Formulation of Topical Administration Hormone Drugs

Hormones have attracted considerable interest in recent years due to their potential use in treatment of many diseases. Their ability to have a multidirectional effect leads to searching for new and increasingly effective drugs and therapies. Limitations in formulating drug forms containing hormones are mainly due to their low enzymatic stability, short half-life and limited bioavailability. One of the solutions may be to develop a hydrogel as a potential hormone carrier, for epidermal and transdermal application. This review discusses the main research directions in developing this drug formulation. The factors determining the action of hormones as drugs are presented. An analysis of hydrogel substrates and permeation enhancers that have the potential to enhance the efficacy of hormones applied to the skin is reviewed.

Relating transdermal delivery plasma pharmacokinetics with in vitro permeation test (IVPT) findings using diffusion and compartment-in-series models

Increasing emphasis is being placed on using in vitro permeation test (IVPT) results for topical products as a surrogate for their in vivo behaviour. This study sought to relate in vivo plasma concentration - time pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles after topical application of drug products to IVPT findings with mechanistic diffusion and compartment models that are now widely used to describe permeation of solutes across the main skin transport barrier, the stratum corneum. Novel in vivo forms of the diffusion and compartment-in-series models were developed by combining their IVPT model forms with appropriate in vivo disposition functions. Available in vivo and IVPT data were then used with the models in data analyses, including the estimation of prediction intervals for in vivo plasma concentrations derived from IVPT data. The resulting predicted in vivo plasma concentration - time profiles for the full models corresponded closely with the observed results for both nitroglycerin and rivastigmine at all times. In contrast, reduced forms of these in vivo models led to discrepancies between model predictions and observed results at early times. A two-stage deconvolution procedure was also used to estimate the in vivo cumulative amount absorbed and shown to be linearly related to that from IVPT, with an acceptable prediction error. External predictability was also shown using a separate set of in vitro and in vivo data for different nitroglycerin patches. This work suggests that mechanistic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic models can be used to predict in vivo behaviour from IVPT data for topical products.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Transdermal and Injection Testosterone Therapy in Klinefelter Syndrome: A Real-Life Study

Context

Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) is the most frequent sex chromosome disorder in males. Due to hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, treatment with testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is commonly indicated. There are no international guidelines for the most appropriate TRT in KS.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate how different routes of testosterone administration impact testosterone-responsive variables, as well as the development of later metabolic diseases and other complications.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study covering 5 years from 2015 to 2020. Data on TRT, biochemical parameters, bone mineral density (BMD), medications, comorbidity, and karyotyping were derived from electronic patient records and The Danish Cytogenetic Register.

Results

A total of 147 KS males were included: 81 received injection TRT, 61 received transdermal TRT, and 5 did not receive TRT. Testosterone levels were similar in the 2 TRT groups (P = 0.9), while luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were higher in the group receiving transdermal TRT (P = 0.002). Levels of cholesterol, blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, hemoglobin, hematocrit, liver parameters, prostate-specific antigen, and spine and hip BMD were similar in the 2 treatment groups (Ps > 0.05).

Conclusion

TRT, irrespective of route of administration, affects androgen-responsive variables similarly in males with KS. Neither long-acting injection nor transdermal gel seem to reduce the risk of metabolic diseases significantly. These results should encourage clinicians in seeking the route of administration resulting in the highest degree of adhesion to treatment based on individual patient preferences. Implementation of shared decision-making with patients may be important when choosing TRT.

New testosterone 2% gel using Ferring Advanced Skin Technology (FAST), for the treatment of testosterone deficiency in men, with a novel applicator

INTRODUCTION

Testosterone deficiency (TD) is an increasing problem that can affect a man's physical and psychological health, and quality of life. Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), combined with weight reduction, lifestyle advice, and the treatment of co-morbidities, is the treatment of choice in men who are not concerned about fertility. However, there remains an unmet need in this therapeutic area, relating to factors such as inconvenient or painful administration, fluctuations in testosterone levels, supra-physiologic testosterone levels, poor tolerability, and secondary safety issues, which may be associated with the current TRT options. Advances in transdermal delivery systems have resulted in the development of a new 2% transdermal testosterone gel, that may offer some additional features over the other currently available TRTs.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a comprehensive review of the published and gray literature to identify randomized studies and non-randomized studies (NRS) involving adult men receiving treatment for low testosterone levels.

EXPERT OPINION

Topical gels are often the most convenient first-line treatment for testosterone deficiency, but options are important as patient preference is more important than virtually any other clinical area of medicine. The chosen therapy must be convenient to use and reach reliable therapeutic levels to effectively and consistently relieve symptoms. Testavan, a new 2% testosterone gel, goes some way to achieving these goals.

A new 2% testosterone gel formulation: a comparison with currently available topical preparations

Testosterone gel formulations have become a popular testosterone replacement therapy in patients with hypogonadism since their advent in the year 2000. The gel formulations restore testosterone levels to mid-normal physiological levels (14-17.5 nmol/L) as early as within 24 h, and help alleviate the signs and symptoms of testosterone deficiency, thereby leading to an improved quality of life. Although testosterone gels have a favourable efficacy and safety profile as compared to injectable and patch formulations, risk of secondary exposure poses a challenge. Approved testosterone topical formulations include Tostrex^® (Tostran^® , Fortesta^® ), Androgel^® (Testogel^® ), Testim^® and Axiron^® (solution), which have a favourable efficacy profile and positively impacted patient-reported outcome(s). Besides, Testavan, which is a 2% testosterone gel, is under registration in Europe and already approved in Australia in May 2017. Testavan uses a novel hydroalcoholic and highly viscous topical formulation. This product comes with a metered dose dispenser and a cap applicator that allows a hands-free application for precise dispensing and application. The present article provides a comprehensive review of pharmacokinetic, tolerability and safety profile of the testosterone gels available in the market along with the new 2% testosterone gel, Testavan.

The efficacy, bioavailability and safety of a novel hydroalcoholic testosterone gel 2% in hypogonadal men: results from phase II open-label studies

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of a novel hydroalcoholic testosterone gel 2% (TG) were evaluated in phase II sequential dose escalation studies using 3 application sites (thigh, abdomen and shoulder/upper arm) and 2 application methods. Hypogonadal men (n = 40), 18-75 years, with serum testosterone <300 ng dl(-1) were included in both studies. Study 1 evaluated hand-applied multiple doses of TG 1.25, 2.50 and 3.75 ml (23, 46 and 70 mg of testosterone, respectively), once daily for 10 days to shoulder/upper arm. Study 2 evaluated applicator-applied (TG 1.25, 2.50 and 3.75 ml) versus hand-applied (TG 2.5 ml) doses, once daily for 7 days to shoulder/upper arm. Primary endpoint for both studies was responder rate (Cave testosterone levels between 298 and 1050 ng dl(-1) ). In Study 1 following multiple applications, >70% participants in each group were responders. Dose-dependent increase was observed in PK values for total testosterone, free testosterone and DHT. In Study 2, responder rate was dose proportional: 16.7%, 50.0% and 77.8% responders in TG 1.25, 2.50 and 3.75 ml groups respectively. The bioavailability was highest for the shoulder application. There was a significant improvement in almost all the domains of sexual functioning. Applicator-application was preferred over hand-application by majority of the participants. TG was found to be safe and well tolerated in hypogonadal men.