Designer Benzodiazepines: A Review of Published Data and Public Health Significance

New psychoactive Substances: A Canadian perspective on emerging trends and challenges for the clinical laboratory

The production and use of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) has skyrocketed over the last decade, causing major challenges for government authorities, public health agencies, and laboratories across the world. NPS are designed to mimic the psychoactive effects of unregulated or controlled drugs, while constantly being modified to evade drug control regulation. Hence, they are referred to as "legal highs", as they are technically legal to sell, possess, and use. NPS can be classified by their pharmacological mechanism of action and include cannabimimetic, depressants, dissociatives, hallucinogens, opioids, and stimulants. There is significant structural diversity within each NPS class, leading to variable detection using traditional clinical laboratory testing and complicating the interpretation of results. In this article, we review each of the NPS classes and summarize their associated mechanism of action, common structures, and metabolic pathways, and provide examples of recent drugs and emerging threats with a focus on Canadian drug trends. We also explore the current analytical advantages and limitations commonly faced by the clinical laboratory and provide insight on how toxicosurveillance can improve detection of NPS in the ever-changing NPS landscape.

Treating Benzodiazepine Withdrawal in a Bridge Clinic

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine-involved overdose deaths are rising, driven by increasing use of nonprescribed benzodiazepine pills. For patients who wish to stop nonprescribed benzodiazepine use, rapid inpatient tapers are typically the only option to treat benzodiazepine withdrawal. Substance use disorder bridge clinics can provide the high-touch care needed to manage outpatient benzodiazepine tapers in patients at high risk due to other substance use disorders.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the implementation and short-term outcomes of an outpatient benzodiazepine taper protocol to treat benzodiazepine withdrawal in a substance use disorder bridge clinic.

METHODS

The clinical team developed a 4- to 6-week intensive outpatient taper protocol using diazepam. Patients with benzodiazepine use disorder were eligible if they had benzodiazepine withdrawal, lacked a prescriber, wanted to stop benzodiazepines completely, and agreed to daily visits. For patients who initiated a taper between April 2021 and December 2022, we evaluated the proportion of patients who completed a taper (i.e., tapered to a last prescribed dose of diazepam 10 mg/d or less); likelihood of remaining on the taper over time; and seizure, overdose, or death documented at the study institution during or within 1 month of taper completion or discontinuation. Other secondary outcomes included HIV testing and prevention, hepatitis C testing, and referrals to recovery coaching or psychiatry.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients initiated a total of 60 benzodiazepine tapers. The population was mostly male (61%) and non-Hispanic White (85%). Nearly all patients had opioid use disorder (96%), and most (80%) were taking methadone or buprenorphine for opioid use disorder before starting the taper. Patients reported using multiple substances in addition to benzodiazepines, most commonly fentanyl (75%), followed by cocaine (41%) and methamphetamine (21%). Fourteen patients (23%) completed a taper with a median duration of 34 days (IQR 27.8-43.5). Most tapers were stopped when the patient was lost to follow-up (57%), or the team recommended inpatient care (18%). Two patients had a seizure, and 4 had a presumed opioid-involved overdose during or within 1 month after the last taper visit, all individuals who did not complete a taper. No deaths occurred during or within 1 month of taper completion or discontinuation. Challenges included frequent loss to follow-up in the setting of other unstable substance use. Patients received other high-priority care during the taper including HIV testing (32%), PrEP initiation (6.7%), hepatitis C testing (30%), and referrals to recovery coaches (18%) and psychiatry (6.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Managing benzodiazepine withdrawal with a 4- to 6-week intensive outpatient taper in patients with benzodiazepine and opioid use disorders is challenging. More work is needed to refine patient selection, balance safety risks with feasibility, and study long-term, patient-centered outcomes.

Exploring trends in benzodiazepine-positive fatal drug overdoses in Tennessee, 2019-2021

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine-positive overdoses increased between 2019 and 2021 in Tennessee. We sought to determine the changes in the number and characteristics of prescription and illicit benzodiazepine-positive fatal drug overdoses during this period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A statewide study was conducted to determine changes in the number and characteristics of benzodiazepine-positive drug overdose decedents using 2019-2021 data from the Tennessee State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System. The analyses were limited to Tennessee residents aged ≥ 18 years. A benzodiazepine-positive overdose was defined as any benzodiazepine on toxicology, regardless of the presence of other substances. Frequencies were generated to compare demographics, circumstances, prescription history, and toxicology between 2019 and 2021 for illicit and prescription benzodiazepine-positive fatal overdoses.

RESULTS

Between 2019 and 2021, 1666 benzodiazepine-positive unintentional or undetermined fatal drug overdoses out of 5916 total overdoses that occurred among adult Tennessee residents with available toxicological information. Prescription benzodiazepines were identified in 80.7% of deaths, whereas illicit benzodiazepines were identified in 12.0% of deaths. Many decedents had an anxiety disorder (45.5%), while over half of all decedents had a history of substance use disorder (52.3%). Most benzodiazepine-positive overdoses involved fentanyl (71.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis can inform local and regional public health workers to implement focused prevention and intervention efforts for people with co-occurring mental health conditions and substance use disorders to curb overdose epidemics among persons using benzodiazepines in Tennessee. Public health campaigns should focus on educating people on appropriate prescription medication use and the dangers of obtaining substances illicitly. Given the high proportion of opioids in this population, further education also is needed on the dangers of polysubstance drug use. The differences between prescription and illicit benzodiazepine-positive fatal overdoses indicate the need to develop substance-specific prevention and treatment strategies.

Designer benzodiazepine rat pharmacokinetics: A comparison of alprazolam, flualprazolam and flubromazolam

Designer benzodiazepines, including flualprazolam and flubromazolam, are clandestinely produced to circumvent federal regulations. Although flualprazolam and flubromazolam are structurally similar to alprazolam, they do not have an approved medical indication. Flualprazolam differs from alprazolam by the addition of a single fluorine atom. Whereas, flubromazolam differs by the addition of a single fluorine atom and substitution of a bromine for a chlorine atom. The pharmacokinetics of these designer compounds have not been extensively evaluated. In the present study, we evaluated flualprazolam and flubromazolam in a rat model and compared the pharmacokinetics of both compounds to alprazolam. Twelve male, Sprague-Dawley rats were given a 2 mg/kg subcutaneous dose of alprazolam, flualprazolam and flubromazolam and plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated. Both compounds displayed significant two-fold increases in volume of distribution and clearance. Additionally, flualprazolam displayed a significant increase in half-life leading to a nearly double half-life when compared to alprazolam. The findings of this study demonstrate that fluorination of the alprazolam pharmacophore increases pharmacokinetic parameters including half-life and volume of distribution. The increase in these parameters for flualprazolam and flubromazolam leads to an overall increased exposure in the body and a potential for greater toxicity than alprazolam.

Benzodiazepine analysis by an improved LC-MS/MS method illustrates usage patterns in Washington State

BACKGROUND

The standard approach for benzodiazepine detection often includes immunoassay followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The illicit use of non-prescribed benzodiazepines has been trending up nationally.

METHODS

We developed and validated an improved LC-MS/MS assay for benzodiazepine detection in urine. We expanded the testing panel by adding five drugs to the previous panel of ten. We determined the prevalence of individual benzodiazepines in our patient population. Immunoassay results were compared with LC-MS/MS to evaluate assay performance.

RESULTS

Clonazepam and alprazolam were the most common benzodiazepines present. Etizolam and flualprazolam were also prevalent in Washington State. Compared with the LC-MS/MS assay, the immunoassay had variable cross-reactivity, which explained false negative and false positive immunoassay results. The inclusion of new drugs in the LC-MS/MS panel significantly reduced the incidence of immunoassay results interpreted as falsely positive.

CONCLUSION

New illicit benzodiazepines have emerged regionally and nationally. The inclusion of novel drugs in LC-MS/MS assay was helpful in properly characterizing the epidemiology of benzodiazepine use in our patient population. This information will lead to better assay result interpretations and patient care, and our experiences provide a roadmap for other clinical laboratories looking to expand their testing menu or transition to new instrumentation.

Designer benzodiazepines: an update

INTRODUCTION

Designer benzodiazepines (DBs) are a subclass of novel psychoactive substances (NPS). DBs mimic the properties of approved and prescribed benzodiazepines.

AREA COVERED

A systematic search of literature on DB classification, structure-activity relationships, pharmacologic properties, and adverse effects.

EXPERT OPINION

The prevalence of DB use has increased substantially over the last decade. All DBs are full-agonist ligands at the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A-benzodiazepine (GABA_A-BZ) receptor system. This is not surprising, since DBs largely represent either minor structural modifications, or well-recognized active metabolites, of existing approved benzodiazepines. As such, the pharmacologic profile and associated risks and hazards of DBs are similar or identical to clinically approved and legitimately prescribed benzodiazepines, most of which have been in use for decades. Concurrent use of DBs along with other abusable or recreational drugs (alcohol, opioids, cocaine, stimulants, hallucinogens, other sedative-hypnotics) represents the principal public health risk. The increasing illicit availability and use of DBs is of concern and requires regulatory attention, but DBs do not rank highly among designer psychotropic agents in terms of health risk to humans.

Combined Use of Flubromazepam and Stimulants: Blood and Oral Fluid Concentrations and Impact on Driving Ability

"Designer" benzodiazepines (DBZDs) are becoming increasingly available in Europe, with the European Monitoring Centre of Drugs and Drug Addiction currently monitoring ∼30 new benzodiazepines. The following driving under the influence of drug (DUID) case describes the oral fluid (OF) and blood concentrations, as well as the observed effects after the combined use of stimulants and flubromazepam. Both OF, collected via the Intercept i2 collector (Immunalysis, Pomona, CA, USA), and blood (collected in containers with various stabilizers) were screened using a liquid chromatographic (LC) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometric (MS-MS) method. In addition, various LC-MS-MS methods in multi-reaction monitoring mode were applied for confirmation and quantification. The OF and blood samples were taken 2 h 25 min and 9 h 19 min after the accident, respectively. OF contained 789 ng/mL amphetamine, 5,173 ng/mL MDMA, 168 ng/mL benzoylecgonine, 492 ng/mL cocaine, 134 ng/mL 4-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC) and traces of flubromazepam (less than limit of quantification (LLOQ); 2 ng/mL). The sodium-fluoride blood samples contained 19 ng/mL amphetamine, 284 ng/mL MDMA, 20 ng/mL MDA, 38 ng/mL benzoylecgonine, 4 ng/mL methylecgonine, 161 ng/mL flubromazepam and traces of 4-MMC (<LLOQ; 2.5 ng/mL). The driver was observed to have an irregular speed driving pattern and could not keep his lane. He demonstrated the following effects after the accident: bloodshot eyes, red face, sweating, fatigue, disorientation in time and space and mental confusion. Even 24 h after the accident, the driver was confused, disoriented, had red spots on his face and could not keep his balance. The effects of flubromazepam combined with several stimulants are demonstrated. Moreover, this case illustrates well the pros and cons of the different biological matrices applied in a DUID context. Differences between the biological matrices are not only observed concerning the ease/practicality of (on-site) collection, but also in the final drug detectability due to the large variations in OF/blood drug concentration ratios and metabolism/elimination rates as a result of the different chemical entities of the compounds.

In silico studies on recreational drugs: 3D quantitative structure activity relationship prediction of classified and de novo designer benzodiazepines

Currently, increasing availability and popularity of designer benzodiazepines (DBZDs) constitutes a primary threat to public health. To assess this threat, the biological activity/potency of DBZDs was investigated using in silico studies. Specific Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) models were developed in Forge™ for the prediction of biological activity (IC50 ) on the γ-aminobutyric acid A receptor (GABA-AR) of previously identified classified and unclassified DBDZs. A set of new potential ligands resulting from scaffold hopping studies conducted with MOE® was also evaluated. Two generated QSAR models (i.e. 3D-field QSAR and RVM) returned very good performance statistics (r2  = 0.98 [both] and q2  = 0.75 and 0.72, respectively). The DBZDs predicted to be the most active were flubrotizolam, clonazolam, pynazolam and flucotizolam, consistently with what reported in literature and/or drug discussion fora. The scaffold hopping studies strongly suggest that replacement of the pendant phenyl moiety with a five-membered ring could increase biological activity and highlight the existence of a still unexplored chemical space for DBZDs. QSAR could be of use as a preliminary risk assessment model for (newly) identified DBZDs, as well as scaffold hopping for the creation of computational libraries that could be used by regulatory bodies as support tools for scheduling procedures.

The designer benzodiazepine, flubromazepam, induces reward-enhancing and cardiotoxic effects in rodents

The use of many benzodiazepines is controlled worldwide due to their high likelihood of abuse and potential adverse effects. Flubromazepam—a designer benzodiazepine—is a long-acting gamma-aminobutyric acid subtype A receptor agonist. There is currently a lack of scientific evidence regarding the potential for flubromazepam dependence or other adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate the dependence potential, and cardiotoxicity via confirmation of the QT and RR intervals which are the factors on the electrical properties of the heart of flubromazepam in rodents. Using a conditioned place preference test, we discovered that mice treated intraperitoneally with flubromazepam (0.1 mg/kg) exhibited a significant preference for the flubromazepam-paired compartment, suggesting a potential for flubromazepam dependence. In addition, we observed several cardiotoxic effects of flubromazepam; 100-μM flubromazepam reduced cell viability, increased RR intervals but not QT intervals in the electrocardiography measurements, and considerably inhibited potassium channels in a human ether-à-go-go-related gene assay. Collectively, these findings suggest that flubromazepam may have adverse effects on psychological and cardiovascular health, laying the foundation for further efforts to list flubromazepam as a controlled substance at both national and international levels.

The alprazolam analogue 4'-chloro deschloroalprazolam identified in seized capsules

New designer benzodiazepines continue to be identified in the illicit drug market. In December 2021, eight capsules were submitted to ChemCentre for analysis. The samples were analysed by a range of analytical techniques including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS, low and high resolution), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography, which identified the main component of the capsules to be 4'-chloro deschloroalprazolam, a new designer benzodiazepine. Alarmingly, the mass spectral data for this alprazolam analogue were very similar to that of alprazolam, such that misidentification could be possible. A minor component of the capsules was also partially characterised, it is believed to be the synthetic precursor 4'-chloro deschloronordiazepam. The information provided in this paper includes ways to discriminate these analogues from alprazolam and nordiazepam which will enable other laboratories to identify these new drugs.

Outpatient Treatment of Chronic Designer Benzodiazepine Use: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Novel psychoactive substances, such as designer benzodiazepines unapproved for therapeutic purposes, are an emerging concern worldwide. They have unknown or unpredictable pharmacological properties. Using a case example, we discuss the use of "Xanax bars," which now generally do not contain the pharmaceutical alprazolam. We describe the difficulty in detecting these substances and the development of a use disorder including adverse outcomes such as seizures when stopped. The evidence for management is anecdotal.

CASE

We describe the case of a male of approximately 25 years of age with alcohol and sedative-hypnotic use disorder related to illicit "Xanax bars," whose point of care urinalysis did not identify benzodiazepines and whose broad-spectrum urinalysis identified the presence of flualprazolam, a novel designer benzodiazepine. He suffered a subacute withdrawal seizure and responded to treatment with loading doses of diazepam and naltrexone.

DISCUSSION

Although previous literature has focused on poisoning and intoxication (including coma), there are few studies examining treatment options for chronic designer benzodiazepine use. Standard approaches, such as conversion to a longer-acting benzodiazepine with a prolonged taper, are risky with designer benzodiazepines due to the unknown level of tolerance and risk of overdosing the patient. Illicit "Xanax" is not equivalent to prescribed alprazolam and cannot be converted and tapered. To be cautious, supervised benzodiazepine tapers or anticonvulsants should be explored as treatment strategies, based on their use in pharmaceutical benzodiazepine use disorders. Inpatient acute withdrawal management should be considered, and anticonvulsants may play a role in the first 4 to 6 weeks of treatment.

Challenges of Diagnosing and Managing Designer Benzodiazepine Dependence and Withdrawal: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Over the last 10 years, an increasing number of unregulated novel psychoactive substances, including "designer benzodiazepines" (DBZDs), have emerged on the recreational drug market. Despite the rapidly increasing usage of DBZDs, there is a significant lack of information regarding clinical management. Here we present a case illustrating the difficulties of diagnosing and managing DBZD related sedative-hypnotic use disorder.

CASE PRESENTATION

Our patient is a 30-year-old man with severe opioid and sedative-hypnotic use disorders. He had a 10-year history of using heroin, clonazolam, and alprazolam. He stopped using heroin when on methadone maintenance therapy but continued using clonazolam and nonprescribed alprazolam. His opioid treatment program discontinued methadone due to benzodiazepine intoxication, and he returned to heroin use. He then presented for residential withdrawal management where he underwent successful buprenorphine induction and benzodiazepine withdrawal management. During a 3-month period of benzodiazepine abstinence, he struggled with ongoing cravings and post-acute withdrawal syndrome, ultimately leading to return to DBZD use.

DISCUSSION

Despite the increasing prevalence of DBZD use, the usage of DBZDs is likely under-recognized because these compounds are generally not included on standard in-office urine drug immunoassay tests. Initial studies suggest that DBZDs have high potencies, shorter half-lives, are more addictive, and can result in more severe withdrawal symptoms compared to known benzodiazepines. However, there remains a lack of information about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of DBZDs, making clinical management for DBZD related sedative-hypnotic use disorders challenging to treat.

Significant toxicity following an increase in poisonings with designer benzodiazepines in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2020

BACKGROUND

Designer benzodiazepines (DBs) are an emerging class of new psychoactive substances. While structurally derived from pharmaceutical benzodiazepines, their toxicological profile is less clear. We investigated time trends in the rate of DB poisonings and their clinical toxicity.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed on the incidence rate of DB poisonings, relative to all recreational drug poisonings reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Center (DPIC) from 2010 to 2020. Time-trend analysis was performed using Poisson regression. A prospective cohort study was performed on toxicity of DBs, including the Poisoning Severity Score, from January 2016-June 2019. Data was collected through telephone interviews.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2020, the DPIC was consulted on 142 DB exposures. The incidence rate of DB exposures increased from 0.1% to 4.3%, with a year effect estimate of 1.35 (95% CI [1.14;1.54]). Twenty different DBs were reported, mostly etizolam (33%), clonazolam (17%), and flunitrazolam (8%). During consultation (often shortly after exposure), poisoning was graded moderate-severe in 29% of cases (n = 146). In the prospective cohort sample with follow-up (n = 22), 86% of cases (n = 19) showed a moderate-severe poisoning. The severity of poisoning did not differ between mono- and mixed intoxications. Frequently reported symptoms in the prospective cohort sample included drowsiness (86%), confusion (59%), and agitation (55%). Coma was observed in seven cases (32%) and respiratory depression requiring mechanical ventilation in five cases (23%).

CONCLUSION

The rate of DB poisonings reported to the DPIC strongly increased from 2010 to 2020, indicating increased (ab)use of DBs. Most DB exposures resulted in moderate-severe toxicity with neurological effects.

Urine Drug Screening in the Era of Designer Benzodiazepines: Comparison of Three Immunoassay Platforms, LC-QTOF-MS, and LC-MS/MS

This study investigated the presence of designer benzodiazepines in 35 urine specimens obtained from emergency department patients undergoing urine drug screening. All specimens showed apparent false-positive benzodiazepine screening results (i.e., confirmatory testing using a 19-component LC-MS/MS panel showed no prescribed benzodiazepines at detectable levels). The primary aims were to identify the possible presence of designer benzodiazepines, characterize the reactivity of commercially available screening immunoassays with designer benzodiazepines, and evaluate the risk of inappropriately ruling out designer benzodiazepine use when utilizing common urine drug screening and confirmatory tests. Specimens were obtained from emergency departments of a single US Health system. Following clinically ordered drug screening using Abbott ARCHITECT c assays and lab-developed LC-MS/MS confirmatory testing, additional characterization was performed for investigative purposes. Specifically, urine specimens were screened using two additional assays (Roche cobas c502, Siemens Dimension Vista) and LC-QTOF-MS to identify presumptively positive species, including benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines. Finally, targeted, qualitative LC-MS/MS was performed to confirm the presence of 12 designer benzodiazepines. Following benzodiazepine detection using the Abbott ARCHITECT, benzodiazepines were subsequently detected in 28/35 and 35/35 urine specimens, respectively, using Siemens and Roche assays. LC-QTOF-MS showed the presumptive presence of at least one non-FDA approved benzodiazepine in 30/35 specimens: flubromazolam (12/35), flualprazolam (11/35), flubromazepam (2/35), clonazolam (4/35), etizolam (9/35), metizolam (5/35), nitrazepam (1/35), and pyrazolam (1/35). Two or three designer benzodiazepines were detected concurrently in 13/35 specimens. Qualitative LC-MS/MS confirmed the presence of at least one designer benzodiazepine or metabolite in 23/35 specimens, with 3 specimens unavailable for confirmatory testing. Urine benzodiazepine screening assays from three manufacturers were cross-reactive with multiple non-US FDA-approved benzodiazepines. Clinical and forensic toxicology laboratories using traditionally designed LC-MS/MS panels may fail to confirm the presence of non-US FDA-approved benzodiazepines detected by screening assays, risking inappropriate interpretation of screening results as false-positives.

The Psychonauts' Benzodiazepines; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Analysis and Docking Prediction of Their Biological Activity

Designer benzodiazepines (DBZDs) represent a serious health concern and are increasingly reported in polydrug consumption-related fatalities. When new DBZDs are identified, very limited information is available on their pharmacodynamics. Here, computational models (i.e., quantitative structure-activity relationship/QSAR and Molecular Docking) were used to analyse DBZDs identified online by an automated web crawler (NPSfinder^®) and to predict their possible activity/affinity on the gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors (GABA-ARs). The computational software MOE was used to calculate 2D QSAR models, perform docking studies on crystallised GABA-A receptors (6HUO, 6HUP) and generate pharmacophore queries from the docking conformational results. 101 DBZDs were identified online by NPSfinder^®. The validated QSAR model predicted high biological activity values for 41% of these DBDZs. These predictions were supported by the docking studies (good binding affinity) and the pharmacophore modelling confirmed the importance of the presence and location of hydrophobic and polar functions identified by QSAR. This study confirms once again the importance of web-based analysis in the assessment of drug scenarios (DBZDs), and how computational models could be used to acquire fast and reliable information on biological activity for index novel DBZDs, as preliminary data for further investigations.

Designer Benzodiazepines: A Review of Toxicology and Public Health Risks

The rising use of designer benzodiazepines (DBZD) is a cat-and-mouse game between organized crime and law enforcement. Non-prohibited benzodiazepines are introduced onto the global drug market and scheduled as rapidly as possible by international authorities. In response, DBZD are continuously modified to avoid legal sanctions and drug seizures and generally to increase the abuse potential of the DBZD. This results in an unpredictable fluctuation between the appearance and disappearance of DBZD in the illicit market. Thirty-one DBZD were considered for review after consulting the international early warning database, but only 3-hydroxyphenazepam, adinazolam, clonazolam, etizolam, deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, meclonazepam, phenazepam and pyrazolam had sufficient data to contribute to this scoping review. A total of 49 reports describing 1 drug offense, 2 self-administration studies, 3 outpatient department admissions, 44 emergency department (ED) admissions, 63 driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) and 141 deaths reported between 2008 and 2021 are included in this study. Etizolam, flualprazolam flubromazolam and phenazepam were implicated in the majority of adverse-events, drug offenses and deaths. However, due to a general lack of knowledge of DBZD pharmacokinetics and toxicity, and due to a lack of validated analytical methods, total cases are much likely higher. Between 2019 and April 2020, DBZD were identified in 48% and 83% of postmortem and DUID cases reported to the UNODC, respectively, with flualprazolam, flubromazolam and etizolam as the most frequently detected substances. DBZD toxicology, public health risks and adverse events are reported.

Quantification of 54 Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs, Including 20 Designer Ones, in Plasma

Benzodiazepines are widely used in the treatment of sleep and anxiety disorders, as well as epileptic seizures and alcohol withdrawal because of their broad therapeutic index and low cost. Due to their central nervous system depressant effects they are also often implicated in traffic accidents and drug-related intoxications. With an increasing number of designer benzodiazepines used in a recreational setting, there is a need for analytical methods to be able to quantify both the prescribed and designer benzodiazepines. A liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method was developed for the quantification of 34 prescribed and 20 designer benzodiazepines in plasma. Different sample preparation strategies, including protein precipitation, liquid-liquid extraction, solid-phase extraction and mini-QuEChERS, were tested. The best recoveries for all compounds of interest were obtained with a liquid-liquid extraction using methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether and 500 μL plasma. The method was fully validated according to the European Medicines Agency guidelines for all compounds, except pivoxazepam, which is included for qualitative purposes only. In-sample stability issues were observed for cloxazolam, both at ambient temperature and during long-term storage at -20°C. Due to the large number of compounds included, the simple and time-efficient sample preparation and the relatively inexpensive instrumentation used, the presented method can be readily implemented in both therapeutic drug monitoring and forensic analyses.

Pharmacotherapy of Patients Taking New Psychoactive Substances: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Case Reports

Background: In recent years, an increase in the frequency of hospitalizations of patients taking newer and newer psychoactive substances has been observed around the world. Each year, authors publish case reports of patients who consumed previously unknown NPS. Most publications of this type concern the period between 2014 and 2016. However, no publication systematically reviews the pharmacotherapy used in these cases. This study aims to review the case reports of patients taking NPS published between 2010 and 2019, as well as analyzing the pharmacotherapy used. Methods: We searched the Thomson (Web of Knowledge), PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. The search was performed using all possible combinations of the term "case report" describing the use of NPS, also referred to as designer medications, internet medications, research chemicals and herbal highs. Results: We analyzed 51 case reports on the intake of various types of NPS. Most of them (p < 0.001) concerned the use of synthetic cannabinoids (41.2%) and cathinones (31.4%). The pharmacotherapy applied primarily (p < 0.001) consisted of administering benzodiazepines to patients (62.7%), most of whom took only this group of medications (25.5%), followed by groups receiving benzodiazepines combined with neuroleptics (15.7%) and muscle relaxants (11.8%). Opioids were administered primarily to patients taking synthetic opioids (p < 0.001). Of the 5 cases of deaths from NPS reported in the literature, three relate specifically to the synthetic opioid MT-45. The later the time period, the more medications patients were administered (p = 0.02). Conclusion: In the pharmacotherapy for NPS poisoning, one should focus primarily on combating psychomotor agitation.

Development and Validation of an LC-MS-MS Method for the Detection of 40 Benzodiazepines and Three Z-Drugs in Blood and Urine by Solid-Phase Extraction

An analytical method for the detection of 40 benzodiazepines, (±)-zopiclone, zaleplon and zolpidem in blood and urine by solid-phase extraction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated. Twenty-nine of 43 analytes were quantified in 0.5 mL whole blood for investigating postmortem, drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) and driving under the influence of drugs cases (DUID). The four different dynamic ranges of the seven-point, linear, 1/x weighted calibration curves with lower limits of quantification of 2, 5, 10 and 20 μg/L across the analytes encompassed the majority of our casework encountered in postmortem, DFSA and DUID samples. Reference materials were available for all analytes except α-hydroxyflualprazolam, a hydroxylated metabolite of flualprazolam. The fragmentation of α-hydroxyflualprazolam was predicted from the fragmentation pattern of α-hydroxyalprazolam, and the appropriate transitions were added to the method to enable monitoring for this analyte. Urine samples were hydrolyzed at 55°C for 30 min with a genetically modified β-glucuronidase enzyme, which resulted in >95% efficiency measured by oxazepam glucuronide. Extensive sample preparation included combining osmotic lysing and protein precipitation with methanol/acetonitrile mixture followed by freezing and centrifugation resulted in exceptionally high signal-to-noise ratios. Bias and between-and within-day imprecision for quality controls (QCs) were all within ±15%, except for clonazolam and etizolam that were within ±20%. All 29 of the 43 analytes tested for QC performance met quantitative reporting criteria within the dynamic ranges of the calibration curves, and 14 analytes, present only in the calibrator solution, were qualitatively reported. Twenty-five analytes met all quantitative reporting criteria including dilution integrity. The ability to analyze quantitative blood and qualitative urine samples in the same batch is one of the most useful elements of this procedure. This sensitive, specific and robust analytical method was routinely employed in the analysis of >300 samples in our laboratory over the last 6 months.

Flualprazolam: Report of an Outbreak of a New Psychoactive Substance in Adolescents

Flualprazolam is a nonregistered drug in the benzodiazepine family and constitutes a new psychoactive substance (NPS). Since 2014, a growing number of designer benzodiazepines have become available over the Internet and on the counterfeit drug market. In June 2019, a cluster of patients intoxicated with flualprazolam was identified by the Oregon Poison Center. As an emerging drug of abuse, the clinical characteristics of flualprazolam have been poorly characterized thus far. Over a one-week period, 6 teenagers presented to local emergency departments after ingesting illegally obtained counterfeit alprazolam, which led to sedation. Other symptoms included slurred speech, confusion, and mild respiratory depression. All 6 patients had resolution of their symptoms within 6 hours of ingestion. Blood and urine samples, as well as a tablet fragment, were obtained from 3 patients. The tablet and biological samples were analyzed by using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and were found to contain the NPS flualprazolam without other drugs or intoxicants. With this case series, we add to the medical literature a clinical description of an emerging drug of abuse. Flualprazolam appears to share the clinical properties of other benzodiazepines. As flualprazolam and other NPSs become more common, physicians must be aware of their availability and characteristics. Sedation lasting <6 hours was observed in 6 of 6 patients exposed to flualprazolam. No effects that would be unexpected from benzodiazepine intoxication were seen among the patients. Specifically, none developed prolonged symptoms or required intubation and mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, or antidotal therapy.

'New/Designer Benzodiazepines': An Analysis of the Literature and Psychonauts' Trip Reports

BACKGROUND

NPS belonging to the benzodiazepine (BZD) class, e.g., 'legal/designer BZDs'/'research chemicals', have recently emerged in the drug (mainly online/virtual) market.

OBJECTIVE

While certain NPS belonging to the BZD class possess pharmacological profiles similar to controlled pharmaceutical BZDs, clinical and pharmacological profiles of current emerging BZDs are still not well-described. Therefore, there is a need to increase clinicians'/public health knowledge/awareness, to incentive harm reduction strategies.

METHOD

A comprehensive overview was carried out by using the EMCDDA/EDND database regularly monitored by our research team, by specifically looking at the 'new BZDs' so far notified. Furthermore, given the limitation of peer-reviewed data published so far, a nonparticipant multilingual qualitative netnographic study was conducted to obtain further clinical/pharmacological/ toxicological data, including psychonauts' online trip reports.

RESULTS

First designer BZDs appeared as NPS around 2007. So far, 29 designer BZDs have been notified to the EMCDDA, being some of them extremely powerful, also at lower dosages. They are sold as tablets/powder/pellets/capsules/blotters/liquids, at very affordable prices, and variably administered. Some are also sold on the illicit drugmarket as counterfeit forms of traditional BZDs or as either adulterants or diluents in heroin or other synthetic opioids/cannabinoids. Nowadays, there is no guarantee of the quality of designer BZDs composition/purification and, hence, most NPS consumers may be inadvertently exposed to unsafe and harmful compounds.

CONCLUSION

Given the limited information on their pharmacology/toxicity, variations in dosage, onset of effects, combination of substances, potency, and general patient or individual variability, the concomitant use of these substances with other drugs entails several and unpredictable risks.