Lack of Drug-Drug Interaction Between Filgotinib, a Selective JAK1 Inhibitor, and Oral Hormonal Contraceptives Levonorgestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol in Healthy Volunteers

The role of filgotinib in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

Filgotinib is an oral small molecule that selectively inhibits JAK1. It is already approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Ongoing studies are evaluating the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in Crohn's disease (CD). The purpose of this review is to summarize the available data regarding filgotinib in the management of UC and CD. We used Pubmed, Embase and clinicaltrials.gov websites to search all available data and currently ongoing studies regarding the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in inflammatory bowel diseases. Filgotinib is an effective and safe drug for the management of biologic-naive and biologic-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe UC. The same efficacy results have not been achieved in CD.

Assessment of interactions and dosage recommendations of synthetic DMARDs-Evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations based on a systematic literature search

Conventional synthetic (cs) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) have potential interactions with a multitude of drugs. Furthermore, they sometimes have a lower therapeutic index, particularly in cases of limited organ functions. The aim of this work was to establish evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of DMARDs in the context of drug interactions and dosage recommendations. A systematic literature search was carried out on the issue of drug interactions and dosages in cases of patients with limited kidney function and higher age and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 2756 scientific publications were screened and 154 selected of which 68 were scrutinized in detail. Furthermore, the respective product information was also analyzed. A multitude of possible interactions of synthetic DMARDs with different drugs were detected, which were then assessed with respect to the clinical significance and consequences. A consensus process led to making recommendations with which the interactions were classified: A: dangerous combination, B: avoid combination (if possible, pausing DMARD treatment), C: possible combination requiring increased monitoring and potential adjustments in dosage and D: pharmacological interaction without relevance in DMARD standard doses. Apart from that dosage recommendations were established for each csDMARD and tsDMARD depending on kidney function and age. There are 3 primary recommendations and 11 core recommendations on interactions and dosages of csDMARDs and tsDMARDs meant as a practical help for therapeutic decision making and to improve safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Pharmacokinetics of dose-adjusted levonorgestrel emergency contraception combined with efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy or rifampicin-containing tuberculosis regimens

OBJECTIVES

To determine if double-dose levonorgestrel emergency contraception (EC) in combination with efavirenz or rifampicin, 2 drugs known to decrease levonorgestrel exposure, resulted in similar pharmacokinetics compared to standard-dose levonorgestrel EC without drug-drug interactions.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a phase 2, open-label, multicenter, partially randomized, 4 parallel group trial in pre-menopausal females ≥16 years old without an indication for EC and not on hormonal contraception. Participants on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) received levonorgestrel 1.5 mg (control group); those on rifampicin-containing tuberculosis therapy received levonorgestrel 3 mg; those on efavirenz-based ART were randomized 1:2 to levonorgestrel 1.5 mg or 3 mg. Plasma was collected through 48 hours post-dose to assess levonorgestrel pharmacokinetics. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over 8 hours was the primary outcome. Levonorgestrel pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between groups using geometric mean ratios (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The median (Q1, Q3) age for all participants (n = 118) was 34 (27, 41) years and BMI was 23.2 (20, 26.3) kg/m2. Participants receiving levonorgestrel 1.5mg plus efavirenz (n = 17) had 50% lower AUC0-8h compared to the control group (n = 32) [0.50 (0.40, 0.62)]. Participants receiving levonorgestrel 3 mg had a similar AUC0-8h when receiving either efavirenz (n = 35) [0.99 (0.81, 1.20)] or rifampicin (n = 34) [1.16 (0.99, 1.36)] compared to control. Levonorgestrel 3 mg resulted in similar or higher maximum concentration with either efavirenz [1.17 (0.96, 1.41)] or rifampicin [1.27 (1.09, 1.49)] compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Doubling the dose of levonorgestrel EC successfully increased levonorgestrel exposure over the first 8 hours in participants receiving either efavirenz-based ART or rifampicin-containing tuberculosis therapy.

IMPLICATIONS

Adjusting levonorgestrel emergency contraception from 1.5 mg to 3 mg improves levonorgestrel pharmacokinetic exposure in participants receiving either efavirenz-based antiretroviral regimens or rifampicin-containing tuberculosis therapy. These data support guideline recommendations to double the dose of levonorgestrel emergency contraception in persons on medications that decrease levonorgestrel exposure by inducing levonorgestrel metabolism.

[Assessment of interactions and dosage recommendations of synthetic DMARDs-Evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations based on a systematic literature search]

Conventional synthetic (cs) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) have potential interactions with a multitude of drugs. Furthermore, they sometimes have a lower therapeutic index, particularly in cases of limited organ functions. The aim of this work was to establish evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of DMARDs in the context of drug interactions and dosage recommendations. A systematic literature search was carried out on the issue of drug interactions and dosages in cases of patients with limited kidney function and higher age and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 2756 scientific publications were screened and 154 selected of which 68 were scrutinized in detail. Furthermore, the respective specialist subject information was also analyzed. A multitude of possible interactions of synthetic DMARDs with different drugs were detected, which were then assessed with respect to the clinical significance and consequences. A consensus process led to making recommendations with which the interactions were classified: A: dangerous combination, B: avoid combination (if possible, pausing DMARD treatment), C: possible combination requiring increased monitoring and potential adjustments in dosage and D: pharmacological interaction without relevance in DMARD standard doses. Apart from that dosage recommendations were established for each csDMARD and tsDMARD depending on kidney function and age. There are 3 primary recommendations and 11 core recommendations on interactions and dosages of csDMARDs and tsDMARDs meant as a practical help for therapeutic decision making and to improve safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Filgotinib for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Filgotinib is an oral Janus kinase type 1 (JAK1) selective inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on pharmacological characteristics, efficacy, and safety of filgotinib in UC.

AREAS COVERED

Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for all relevant studies reporting the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with moderate to severe UC. We particularly focused on the risk of zoster infection and venous thromboembolism compared to other JAK inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Filgotinib has remarkable efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles in the treatment of moderate-to-severe active UC. It can be used in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients. The rapid mechanism of action and its oral administration route make it a reliable therapeutic option.

Safety and efficacy in the nursing care of people with rheumatic diseases on janus kinase inhibitor therapy

Nurses's support of patients needs an evidence base as much as that of specialists management. However, some more practical aspects need specific questions that are not addressed in medical societies' recommendations. Our objective was to investigate the effect of Janus kinase inhibitors (jakinibs) on efficacy, safety, infections, cardiovascular risk, vaccination, pregnancy and lactation, interactions, surgery, and switch in adult patients with rheumatic diseases. We used the methodology for rapid reviews. Medline was searched for systematic reviews of randomised clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies reporting on the target aspects, without limits, yielding 540 titles, of which 70 articles were selected for detailed reading after the screening of title and abstract. In the case of no systematic review being published on a specific question, we resorted to the information provided by primary studies. The efficacy and safety profiles are similar to that of TNF-inhibitors to which they are compared in most studies; however, there is an increased risk of herpes zoster infections with jakinibs. The evidence on pregnancy, surgery and switches between jakinibs is very limited, although, so far, there are no major issues to inform patients about or to implement specific measures. In general, evidence to support nursing management in patients being treated with jakinibs is of moderate quality and scarce, ought to the recent incursion of jakinibs as a treatment.

Critical Appraisal of Filgotinib in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Current Evidence and Place in Therapy

Background and Aims

Patients affected by moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) demand a challenging management. Small molecules, administrated as oral agents, have the ambition of overcoming the limitations of the biologic agents (ie, parenteral administration, rapidity of action, primary and secondary non-responsiveness). Beyond tofacitinib, a pan-Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor already approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe UC, novel more selective molecules like filgotinib are being currently evaluated in randomized clinical trials. We aimed to review the current evidence on filgotinib, a JAK-1 preferential inhibitor, in the treatment of UC and its place in therapy in the current scenario.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant studies: those investigating the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in the treatment of UC patients were included in this narrative review.

Results

The current preliminary data have shown that filgotinib is safe and effective in inducing clinical end endoscopic response in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe UC, also with high inflammatory burden at baseline. In the SELECTION trial, one case of pulmonary embolism occurred with filgotinib 200 mg induction, and three venous thrombosis cases were observed in the placebo maintenance/LTE; the incidence of herpes zoster was ≤1% in all UC treated patients. Filgotinib represents an appealing treatment option for its high selectiveness, route of administration and rapidity of action; cost-effectiveness studies and head-to-head trials are needed to better define its place in therapy.

Filgotinib: A Clinical Pharmacology Review

Filgotinib (GS-6034, formerly GLPG0634; Jyseleca^®) is an oral, preferential Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor. Preferential inhibition of JAK1 modulates a subset of proinflammatory cytokines within the JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway, which differ from those inhibited by JAK2 or JAK3. Filgotinib is absorbed extensively and rapidly after oral dosing and is metabolized by carboxylesterase isoform 2 to form its primary active metabolite, GS-829845. The primary metabolite has a similar JAK1 selectivity profile but reduced activity (by 10-fold) and increased systemic exposure (approximately 16- to 20-fold) compared with the parent compound. Both the parent and the metabolite demonstrate low binding to plasma proteins in humans (< 60%). Systemic exposures of filgotinib and its primary metabolite increase dose proportionally over a 50- to 200-mg once-daily dose range. Food does not affect the pharmacokinetics of filgotinib. Consistent with their terminal elimination half-lives (4.9-10.7 h for filgotinib and 19.6-27.3 h for the primary metabolite), steady state in plasma is reached by day 2 for filgotinib and day 4 for its metabolite. Filgotinib is mainly eliminated in the urine as the metabolite (> 80%). Intrinsic factors such as age, sex, race, mild renal impairment, and mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment have either no or minimal impact on the pharmacokinetics of filgotinib and its primary metabolite. Filgotinib has a low drug-drug interaction potential, without clinically significant interactions with commonly coadministered medications in patients with inflammatory diseases. Both filgotinib and its primary metabolite are substrates of P-glycoprotein (P-gp); however, coadministration with P-gp inhibitors and inducers does not affect filgotinib pharmacokinetics sufficiently to warrant dose adjustment. Neither filgotinib nor its primary metabolite affect the corrected QT interval (calculated using Fridericia's correction formula). Filgotinib is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis in Europe, the UK, and Japan.

Positioning Filgotinib in the Treatment Algorithm of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Filgotinib is a small molecule that selectively inhibits Janus kinase [JAK] type 1. It is already approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and is being evaluated for the management of patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis [UC]. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the currently available data on filgotinib and to define how to position this new drug in the treatment algorithm of patients with UC.

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched up to June 25, 2021 in order to identify studies reporting efficacy and safety data of filgotinib in patients with UC.

RESULTS

Data from a phase III study enrolling UC patients with moderate to severe disease show that filgotinib is effective with a reassuring safety profile. Filgotinib treatment is not associated with a greater risk of thrombosis and herpes zoster infections compared to other JAK inhibitors. However, animal studies reported impaired spermatogenesis and histopathological effects on male reproductive organs, making it necessary to deepen this aspect in dedicated human studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Filgotinib is an effective and safe drug for treatment of both biologic-naive and biologic-experienced patients with moderate to severe UC and may soon be available.

Assessment of the Effect of Filgotinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Atorvastatin, Pravastatin, and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Adult Participants

Filgotinib, an oral Janus kinase‐1 preferential inhibitor, is approved in Europe and Japan for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality; thus, it is important to understand potential drug‐drug interactions of filgotinib with lipid‐lowering agents. This open‐label, randomized, 2‐way crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin with and without filgotinib coadministration. Healthy participants (N = 27) received single doses of atorvastatin (40 mg) and of a pravastatin (40 mg)/rosuvastatin (10 mg) cocktail—alone or with filgotinib (200 mg once daily for 11 days)—on 2 different occasions with washout in between. Serial pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected, and safety was assessed. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric least‐squares mean (GLSM) ratio of the test treatment (statin coadministration with filgotinib) vs statin alone, with prespecified lack‐of‐interaction bounds of 0.70 to 1.43. Coadministration of filgotinib did not affect atorvastatin area under the plasma concentration–time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC_inf; [GLSM ratios (90% CI): 0.91 (0.84‐0.99)]), but maximum concentration [C_max] was slightly lower [0.82 (0.69‐0.99)]. The exposure of 2‐hydroxy‐atorvastatin was unaffected (GLSM ratios [90% CI], 0.98 [0.81‐1.19] for C_max; 1.11 [1.02‐1.22] for AUC_inf). Pravastatin AUC_inf was also unaffected (GLSM ratios, 1.22 [1.05‐1.41], but C_max was slightly higher 1.25 [1.01‐1.54]). Rosuvastatin exposure was moderately higher with filgotinib coadministration—GLSM ratios (90% CI), 1.68 (1.43‐1.97) for C_max; 1.42 (1.30‐1.57) for AUC_inf—but this was not considered clinically relevant. These results indicate that filgotinib has no clinically meaningful effect on exposure of atorvastatin, pravastatin, or rosuvastatin.

Evaluating filgotinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Despite the availability of an extensive armamentarium, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains a therapeutic challenge for rheumatologists. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are an emerging class of targeted therapies. The number of JAKi has been growing and to date, filgotinib is the latest JAKi to be approved for use in RA.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with RA.

EXPERT OPINION

Filgotinib is an oral targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) that specifically inhibits JAKi. Filgotinib monotherapy, or a combination regimen with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs, has demonstrated efficacy in decreasing disease activity, with a well-managed safety profile in patients with early RA naive to DMARDs, and in RA that does not adequately respond to csDMARDs and/or biologic DMARDs. The selective inhibition of JAK1 may confer an improved safety profile, but further study is required as a potential testicular toxicity has been suggested. Filgotinib offers several advantages: oral administration, rapidity of action, efficacy as monotherapy, and demonstrated activity in difficult to treat RA. However, the placement of filgotinib in the therapeutic arsenal for RA may be influenced by the ongoing collection of long-term safety data from JAKi as a class.