Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Neutralizing Activity of SYN023, a Mixture of Two Novel Antirabies Monoclonal Antibodies Intended for Use in Postrabies Exposure Prophylaxis

A phase 2b, Randomized, double blinded comparison of the safety and efficacy of the monoclonal antibody mixture SYN023 and human rabies immune globulin in patients exposed to rabies

BACKGROUND

SYN023 is an anti-rabies monoclonal antibody mixture administered as part of post-exposure prophylaxis regimens. The rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) concentration generally accepted as an adequate immune response to vaccination is ≥ 0.5 IU/mL.

METHODS

Within 54 h of potential rabies exposure, 448 patients in two risk substrata of WHO Category III exposure were randomized to receive either 0.3 mg/kg SYN023 or 0.133 mL/kg human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG) injected in and around the wound site(s) plus a course of rabies vaccination. Patients were followed for safety and absence of rabies for ≥ 365 days.

RESULTS

GMT RVNA was higher with SYN023 throughout the 2-week post-treatment period. In the primary analysis group (n = 368), 99.4 % of SYN023 recipients versus 4.5 % of HRIG recipients had protective RVNA levels on Day 4. On Day 8, 98.1 % SYN023 versus 12.2 % HRIG recipients were protected. The SYN023:HRIG ratio of geometric mean titer of RVNA (RVNA GMTs) on Day 8 (19.42) exceeded the 10 % superiority margin (P < 0.0001) indicating higher Day 8 RVNA with SYN023. On Day 99, the SYN023:HRIG RVNA GMT ratio (0.66) was below the non-inferiority margin of 20 % (P = 0.9485) suggesting some moderation of vaccine immune response by SYN023 relative to HRIG. The ratio of percent SYN023:HRIG recipients achieving RVNA ≥ 0.5 IU/mL on Day 99 (0.98) met the non-inferiority margin of 20 % (P = 0.013) indicating anti-rabies immune response with SYN023 was non-inferior to HRIG despite this effect. There were no probable/confirmed rabies cases in any patient. Study regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

SYN023 provided higher RVNA than HRIG soon after rabies exposure. By Day 99 post-treatment, GM RVNA with SYN023 was lower than HRIG, however, the percent of SYN023 recipients with a protective response was not inferior at this time point. No rabies cases were reported in the study. The SYN023 safety profile was acceptable.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ID: NCT03961555.

Long-Acting Strategies for Antibody Drugs: Structural Modification, Controlling Release, and Changing the Administration Route

Because of their high specificity, high affinity, and targeting, antibody drugs have been widely used in the treatment of many diseases and have become the most favored new drugs for research in the world. However, some antibody drugs (such as small-molecule antibody fragments) have a short half-life and need to be administered frequently, and are often associated with injection-site reactions and local toxicities during use. Increasing attention has been paid to the development of antibody drugs that are long-acting and have fewer side effects. This paper reviews existing strategies to achieve long-acting antibody drugs, including modification of the drug structure, the application of drug delivery systems, and changing their administration route. Among these, microspheres have been studied extensively regarding their excellent tolerance at the injection site, controllable loading and release of drugs, and good material safety. Subcutaneous injection is favored by most patients because it can be quickly self-administered. Subcutaneous injection of microspheres is expected to become the focus of developing long-lasting antibody drug strategies in the near future.

Neutralizing antibody activity, safety and immunogenicity of human anti-rabies virus monoclonal antibody (Ormutivimab) in Chinese healthy adults: A phase Ⅱb randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

This study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trail to evaluate the rabies virus neutralizing activity（RVNA）, safety and immunogenicity of Ormutivimab + rabies vaccine in Chinese healthy adults.

METHODS

Subjects were randomly and equally assigned to 4 groups (20 IU/kg Omtv + vaccine, 40 IU/kg Omtv + vaccine, 20 IU/kg HRIG + vaccine, and placebo + vaccine). Subjects received vaccine as the WHO Essen regime combined with Omutivimab、HRIG or placebo on Day 0. The study lasted for 43 days.

RESULTS

A total of 240 subjects were simultaneously assigned to both FAS and SS. Fifty subjects with baseline RVNA > 0.05 IU/ml (detection limit) were excluded, 190 were included into mITT. All the subjects from 40 IU/kg Omtv + vaccine group had a protection level of RNVA (≥0.5 IU/ml, WHO) on Day 14, and those in 20 IU/kg Omtv + vaccine group and placebo + vaccine group converted positive 100 % on Day 28. In contrast to 20 IU/kg HRIG + vaccine and placebo + vaccine, Ormutivimab + vaccine provided a higher RVNA during Days 0 to 7. And RVNA in 40 IU/kg Omtv + vaccine and 20 IU/kg Omtv + vaccine groups were always higher than 20 IU/kg HRIG + vaccine group during the whole study. Although anti-Omtv antibody were detected in some subjects, it did not influence the RVNA. The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in 20 IU/kg Omtv + vaccine group (17.2 %) than in 40 IU/kg Omtv + vaccine (36.7 %) and 20 IU/kg HRIG + vaccine groups (40.3 %).

CONCLUSION

Compared with HRIG + vaccine and placebo + vaccine, Omtv + vaccine provided higher RNVA for earlier immune protection. The interference of Ormutivimab on the long-term immune protection induced by rabies vaccine is weaker than HRIG. At the same dose, the adverse reactions of Omtv + vaccine group were less than HRIG + vaccine group.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02559921.

Advances in the progress of monoclonal antibodies for rabies

Rabies is a highly fatal zoonotic disease caused by the rabies virus invading the central nervous system. When suspected of exposure to the rabies virus, post-exposure prophylaxis should be administered as soon as possible. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) neutralizing the rabies virus could be better in human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis than equine or human rabies immune globulin in terms of supply, cost, and efficacy. This article reviews anti-rabies mAbs produced by multiple techniques, and the results of clinical trials for anti-rabies mAbs cocktails recognizing non-overlapping epitopes are also discussed.

Monoclonal antibodies against rabies: current uses in prophylaxis and in therapy

Rabies is a severe viral infection that causes an acute encephalomyelitis, which presents a case fatality of nearly 100% after the manifestation of neurological clinical signs. Rabies can be efficiently prevented with post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), composed of vaccines and anti-rabies immunoglobulins (RIGs); however, no treatment exists for symptomatic rabies. The PEP protocol faces access and implementation obstacles in resource-limited settings, which could be partially overcome by substituting RIGs for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). mAbs offer lower production costs, consistent supply availability, long-term storage/stability, and an improved safety profile. Here we summarize the key features of the different available mAbs against rabies, focusing on their application in PEP and highlighting their potential in a novel therapeutic approach.

Rabies virus neutralizing activity, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the monoclonal antibody mixture SYN023 in combination with rabies vaccination: Results of a phase 2, randomized, blinded, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

SYN023-002 is a randomized, blinded, controlled study comparing rabies virus neutralizing activity (RVNA) and safety of SYN023, a monoclonal anti-rabies antibody mixture, to human-serum derived anti-rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) when administered with commercially available vaccines to healthy adult volunteers.

METHODS

Participants were randomized among 4 treatment groups (SYN023 + Imovax, SYN023 + RabAvert, HyperRab + Imovax, HyperRab + RabAvert). On Day 0, subjects received 1 dose of RIG (0.3 mg/kg SYN023 or 20 IU/mL HyperRab) and their first of 5 vaccine doses. The primary objective was to compare cumulative RVNA between SYN023 and HyperRab recipients. Secondary objectives were to compare safety and to assess SYN023 pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity.

RESULTS

All 164 randomized subjects initiated treatment and were included in safety analyses. At least 34 subjects/treatment group received all treatment and had complete RVNA results, thus were included in the primary endpoint analysis. Mean RVNAs were approximately ten-fold higher in SYN023 recipients compared to HyperRab recipients until Day 14. From Day 14 onwards, mean RVNA was lower in SYN023 recipients, but remained above the RVNA level widely considered adequate (≥0.5 IU/mL) through Day 112 (study end). The point estimate of the cumulative RVNA (83.22% SYN023/HyperRab), but not the lower CI bound (90% CI: 66.06%, 104.83%), fell within the protocol-defined similarity margin. Each RIG + vaccine regimen appeared safe with mostly mild AEs and no serious or severe related events observed. Except injection site pain (22% HyperRab recipients vs. 6% SYN023 recipients), treatment-related AEs incidences were similar between RIGs. Anti-SYN023 antibodies were observed but had no apparent effects on PK or safety.

CONCLUSIONS

SYN023 administered with commercially available vaccines provides adequate antibody coverage beginning earlier than other commercially available RIGs with an acceptable safety profile. Some suppression of vaccine response occurred, but RVNA levels ≥ 0.5 IU/mL were maintained throughout the relevant period.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02956746.

FUNDING

Synermore biologics.