Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a Single Oral Dose of Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Combination Tablets in Healthy Japanese Study Participants

Pharmacokinetics of Antiretroviral Drugs in Older People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) has significantly improved in recent decades, mostly due to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy. Aging can affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs and, as a consequence, increase the risk of drug interactions and toxicity that may impact treatment. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature on the effect of aging on ARV pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Searches were performed in the BVS, EMBASE and PUBMED databases until November 2022. All studies available in English, Spanish and Portuguese investigating the pharmacokinetics of ARV approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2005 to 2020 were selected. Peer-reviewed publications were included if they met all criteria: adults (≥ 18 years of age) living with or without HIV; report any pharmacokinetic parameter or plasma concentration of at least one of the following ARVs: tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF); doravirine (DOR), rilpivirine (RIL) and etravirine (ETR); darunavir (DRV), tipranavir (TPV) and fostemsavir (FTR); dolutegravir (DTG), raltegravir (RAL), bictegravir (BIC) and elvitegravir (EVG); maraviroc (MVC); ibalizumab (IBA); cobicistat (COBI). Pharmacokinetic parameters were reported stratified per age group: young adults (aged 18-49 years) or older (age ≥ 50 years) and all studies were evaluated for quality. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42021236432).

RESULTS

Among 97 studies included, 20 reported pharmacokinetic evaluation in older individuals (age ≥ 50 years). Twenty five percent of the articles were phase I randomized clinical trials with HIV-negative participants and non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis presenting the parameters area under the curve (AUC) and peak drug concentration (Cmax). Seven age-stratified studies evaluated BIC, ETR, DRV, DTG, DOR and RAL. We found publications with discordant results for ETR and DTG pharmacokinetics in different age groups. DRV exposure was highly variable but modestly increased in aging PLWHIV. In contrast, no influence of age on BIC, DOR and RAL exposure was observed. A variability in pharmacokinetic parameters could be observed for the other ARVs (TAF and MVC) in different age groups.

CONCLUSION

Exposure to DRV increases modestly with age, while exposure to BIC, DOR and RAL appears to be unaffected by age. As the available evidence to confirm a potential effect of aging on ARV pharmacokinetics is limited, further studies are necessary.

Transfer of antiretroviral drugs into breastmilk: a prospective study from the Swiss Mother and Child HIV Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

In 2018, Switzerland changed its guidelines to support women living with HIV wishing to breastfeed. The exposure of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) in breastmilk and the ingested daily dose by the breastfed infant are understudied, notably for newer ARVs. This study aimed to quantify ARV concentrations in maternal plasma and breastmilk to determine the milk/plasma ratio, to estimate daily infant ARV dose from breastfeeding and to measure ARV concentrations in infants.

METHODS

All women wishing to breastfeed were included, regardless of their ARV treatment. Breastmilk and maternal plasma samples were mostly collected at mid-dosing interval.

RESULTS

Twenty-one mother/child pairs were enrolled; of those several were on newer ARVs including 10 raltegravir, 1 bictegravir, 2 rilpivirine, 2 darunavir/ritonavir and 3 tenofovir alafenamide. No vertical HIV transmission was detected (one infant still breastfed). The median milk/plasma ratios were 0.96/0.39 for raltegravir once/twice daily, 0.01 for bictegravir, 1.08 for rilpivirine, 0.12 for darunavir/ritonavir and 4.09 for tenofovir alafenamide. The median estimated infant daily dose (mg/kg) from breastfeeding was 0.02/0.25 for raltegravir once/twice daily, 0.01 for bictegravir, 0.02 for rilpivirine, 0.05 for darunavir/ritonavir and 0.007 for tenofovir alafenamide, resulting in relative infant dose <10% exposure index for all ARVs.

CONCLUSIONS

ARVs were transferred to a variable extent in breastmilk. Nevertheless, the estimated daily ARV dose from breastfeeding remained low. Differential ARV exposure was observed in breastfed infants with some ARVs being below/above their effective concentrations raising the concern of resistance development if HIV infection occurs. More data on this potential risk are warranted to better support breastfeeding.