Attention: Behavior and Neural Mechanisms

Characteristics of activation in the parietal areas of the cortex in humans in different types of visual attention

The state of cortical activation in the parietal and temporal areas was assessed using evoked potentials (EP) during the tasks of selection of lateralized visual stimuli requiring three different types of attention: to stimulus shape, to stimulus position, and to both. Studies in 15 young, healthy subjects involved recording of EP in six cortical leads: P3, P4, T3, T4, T5, and T6, with analysis of the endogenous EP components CNV, N1, P3, and the EP complex [N1-P3] (according to standard terminology). Changes in EP components in response to the attended and non-attended stimulus features were compared. Differences between them were assessed using the index of selectivity of attention to one or another feature of the visual stimuli. In the parietal area, selectivity was seen in conditions of attention to stimulus position and attention to stimulus shape. In conditions of simultaneous attention, the indexes of selectivity were essentially equal to the sum of the indexes of selectivity of attention to shape and position. The most marked endogenous EP components (CNV, N1, and P3) in visual selection were seen in the parietal areas, with a greater gradient of increased activation of the parietal areas of the cortex as the need for attention increased, along with a lower threshold for the action of attention, and anticipatory development of the P3 wave in the parietal area as compared with the temporal area. These results suggest that the parietal cortex has priority in the visual attention system and that the magnocellular (M) pathway forms the most important visual input to the dorsal parietal area of the neocortex.

Physiology of somatosensory perception: cerebral lateralization and extinction

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the effects of cerebral lateralization and temporal dynamics on somatosensory perception.

BACKGROUND

We postulated that perceptual thresholds for simple somatosensory stimuli would be less in the left than the right hand, and that a left/right asymmetry in extinction would exist in healthy right-handed subjects (but not in left-handed subjects). During the course of these experiments we also examined the controversy concerning the temporal dynamics of somatosensory perception.

METHODS

A total of 126 healthy subjects (age range, 6 to 73 years) participated in the study. Effects of handedness, age, vigilance, gaze, and temporal interval on somatosensory perception were examined in a series of experiments. Brief electric pulses were applied to the index finger of one or both hands.

RESULTS

Perceptual thresholds are lower in the left than the right hand of healthy right-handed subjects in a large cohort across a wide age range. Left-handed subjects have no overall asymmetry. Even after compensation for baseline threshold differences, single stimuli in right-handed subjects are perceived more readily in the left than the right hand, and left-hand targets are more difficult to mask. Leftward eye/head gaze lowers thresholds in both hands of right-handed subjects (compared with right or straight gaze). Extinction was consistently maximal when the mask followed the target by 50 to 100 msec.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate clearly that left/right perceptual thresholds for simple somatosensory stimuli are asymmetric in healthy right-handed subjects. Both central and peripheral asymmetries exist. The central asymmetry and gaze effects are consistent with right cerebral dominance for externally directed attention. Access of somatosensory stimuli to conscious awareness is delayed and particularly vulnerable to disruption at 50 to 100 msec after onset of the stimulus.