Epigenetic Analysis of SV40 Minichromosomes

Mapping Nucleosome Location Using FS-Seq

The organization of nucleosomes in eukaryotic chromatin is thought to play a critical role in the regulation of the biological function of the chromatin. Because of this potential role in regulation, a number of techniques have been developed, which combine chromatin fragmentation around nucleosomes with next-generation sequencing to map the location of nucleosomes in chromatin. In this section, a procedure using a kit from New England Biolabs (NEB NEXT Ultra II FS DNA library prep Kit) to fragment chromatin in preparation for next-generation sequencing is described and compared to other available procedures for mapping nucleosome location.

Early in an SV40 infection, histone modifications correlate with the presence or absence of RNAPII and direction of transcription

Since epigenetic regulation seemed likely to be involved in SV40 early transcription following infection, we have analyzed the organization of nucleosomes carrying histone modifications (acetyl-H3, acetyl-H4, H3K9me1, H3K9me3, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27me3, H4K20me1) at 30 min and 2 h post infection in SV40 minichromosomes prepared in the absence or presence of the transcription inhibitor dichloro-1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl benzimidazole. The former condition was used to determine how SV40 chromatin structure changed during early transcription, and the latter was used to determine the role of active transcription. The location of RNAPII was used as a marker to identify where histone modifications were most likely to be involved in regulation. Acetyl-H3 acted like epigenetic memory by being present at sites subsequently bound by RNAPII, while H3K9me1 and H3K27me3 were reorganized to the late side of the SV40 regulatory region apparently to repress late transcription. The organization of acetyl-H3 and H3K9me1 but not H3K27me3 required active transcription.

Differential SP1 interactions in SV40 chromatin from virions and minichromosomes

SP1 binding in SV40 chromatin in vitro and in vivo was characterized in order to better understand its role during the initiation of early transcription. We observed that chromatin from disrupted virions, but not minichromosomes, was efficiently bound by HIS-tagged SP1 in vitro, while the opposite was true for the presence of endogenous SP1 introduced in vivo. Using ChIP-Seq to compare the location of SP1 to nucleosomes carrying modified histones, we found that SP1 could occupy its whole binding site in virion chromatin but only the early side of its binding site in most of the minichromosomes carrying modified histones due to the presence of overlapping nucleosomes. The results suggest that during the initiation of an SV40 infection, SP1 binds to an open region in SV40 virion chromatin but quickly triggers chromatin reorganization and its own removal.

Comparing a new method for mapping nucleosomes in simian virus 40 chromatin to standard procedures

The location of nucleosomes in chromatin significantly impacts many biological processes including DNA replication, repair, and gene expression. A number of techniques have been developed for mapping nucleosome locations in chromatin including MN-Seq (micrococcal nuclease digestion followed by next-generation sequencing), ATAC-Seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin followed by next-generation sequencing), and ChIP-Seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation and fragmentation followed by next-generation sequencing). All of these techniques have been successfully used, but each with its own limitations. Recently, New England Biolabs has marketed a new kit, the NEBNext Ultra II FS Library Prep kit, for preparing libraries for next-generation sequencing from purified genomic DNA. This kit is based on a novel proprietary DNA fragmentation procedure which appears to cleave DNA that is not bound by proteins. Because DNA is fragmented directly in the FS kit, we tested whether the kit might also be useful for mapping the location of nucleosomes in chromatin. Using simian virus 40 (SV40) chromatin isolated at different times in an infection, we have compared nucleosome mapping using the NEB FS kit (referred to as FS-Seq) to MN-Seq, ATAC-Seq, and ChIP-Seq. Mapping nucleosomes using FS-Seq generated nucleosome profiles similar to those generated by ATAC-Seq and ChIP-Seq in regulatory regions of the SV40 genome. We conclude that FS-Seq is a simple, robust, cost-effective procedure for mapping nucleosomes in SV40 chromatin that should be useful for other forms of chromatin as well. We also present evidence that FS-Seq may be useful for mapping transcription factors.

Epigenetic Regulation of Viral Biological Processes

It is increasingly clear that DNA viruses exploit cellular epigenetic processes to control their life cycles during infection. This review will address epigenetic regulation in members of the polyomaviruses, adenoviruses, human papillomaviruses, hepatitis B, and herpes viruses. For each type of virus, what is known about the roles of DNA methylation, histone modifications, nucleosome positioning, and regulatory RNA in epigenetic regulation of the virus infection will be discussed. The mechanisms used by certain viruses to dysregulate the host cell through manipulation of epigenetic processes and the role of cellular cofactors such as BRD4 that are known to be involved in epigenetic regulation of host cell pathways will also be covered. Specifically, this review will focus on the role of epigenetic regulation in maintaining viral episomes through the generation of chromatin, temporally controlling transcription from viral genes during the course of an infection, regulating latency and the switch to a lytic infection, and global dysregulation of cellular function.