What happens when the therapist leaves? The impact of therapy transfer on the therapeutic alliance and symptoms

Court-Mandated Patients' Perspectives on the Psychotherapist's Dual Loyalty Conflict - Between Ally and Enemy

BACKGROUND

Mental health professionals working in correctional contexts engage a double role to care and control. This dual loyalty conflict has repeatedly been criticized to impede the development of a high-quality alliance. As therapeutic alliance is a robust predictor of outcome measures of psychotherapy, it is essential to investigate the effects of this ethical dilemma.

METHODS

This qualitative interview study investigates patients' perceptions of their therapists' dual role conflict in court-mandated treatment settings. We interviewed 41 older incarcerated persons using a semi-structured interview guide, the interviews were subsequently analyzed following thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We first present the patients' perceptions of their treating psychotherapist's dual loyalty conflict, which was linked to their overall treatment experience. In a second step, we outline the study participants' reasons for this judgment, which were most commonly linked to feelings of trust or betrayal. More specifically, they named certain therapist characteristics and activities that enabled them to develop a trustful therapeutic alliance, which we grouped into four topics: (1) respecting the patient's pace and perceived coercion; (2) patient health needs to be first priority; (3) clarity in roles and responsibilities; and (4) the art of communication - between transparency and unchecked information sharing.

DISCUSSION

Developing a high quality alliance in mandatory offender treatment is central due to its relationship with recovery and desistance. Our findings show that some therapists' characteristics and activities attenuate the negative impact of their double role on the development and maintenance of the alliance. To increase the effectiveness of court-mandated treatments, we need to support clinicians in dealing with their dual role to allow the formation of a high quality therapeutic alliance. Our qualitative interview study contributed to this much-needed empirical research on therapist' characteristics promoting a trustful relationship in correctional settings.

Novel Prefrontal Synthesis Intervention Improves Language in Children with Autism

Prefrontal synthesis (PFS) is defined as the ability to juxtapose mental visuospatial objects at will. Paralysis of PFS may be responsible for the lack of comprehension of spatial prepositions, semantically-reversible sentences, and recursive sentences observed in 30 to 40% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In this report we present data from a three-year-long clinical trial of 6454 ASD children age 2 to 12 years, which were administered a PFS-targeting intervention. Tablet-based verbal and nonverbal exercises emphasizing mental-juxtaposition-of-objects were organized into an application called Mental Imagery Therapy for Autism (MITA). The test group included participants who completed more than one thousand exercises and made no more than one error per exercise. The control group was selected from the rest of participants by a matching procedure. Each test group participant was matched to the control group participant by age, gender, expressive language, receptive language, sociability, cognitive awareness, and health score at first evaluation using propensity score analysis. The test group showed a 2.2-fold improvement in receptive language score vs. control group (p < 0.0001) and a 1.4-fold improvement in expressive language (p = 0.0144). No statistically significant change was detected in other subscales not targeted by the exercises. These findings show that language acquisition improves after training PFS and that a further investigation of the PFS-targeting intervention in a randomized controlled study is warranted.

The influence of extra-therapeutic social support on the association between therapeutic bond and treatment outcome

Objective: Both good therapeutic bond as well as extra-therapeutic social support seem to enhance treatment outcomes. Some features of the therapeutic bond are similar to experiences in extra-therapeutic relationships (e.g., feelings of trust or belongingness). Patients with a lack of social support might benefit particularly from a good therapeutic bond, because a well-formed bond can partly substitute relationship needs. This study replicates former research (main effects of bond and social support) and investigates the hypothesized interaction between both constructs. Method: Data from 1206 adult patients receiving cognitive-behavioral outpatient therapy were analyzed. Patients rated early therapeutic bond, their impairment, as well as their social support. Multilevel regression analyses were applied to test for main effects and interactions between bond and social support predicting therapy outcome post treatment. Results: Consistent with prior research, both therapeutic bond and social support predicted therapy outcome. Among patients with high social support, the impact of the therapeutic bond was minimal, while patients with low social support benefited most from a good therapeutic bond. Conclusions: Results suggest that both the therapeutic bond and social support play a role in therapy outcomes and that good therapeutic bond quality might be especially important if a patient lacks social support.