Research Projects Supported by the University of California, San Francisco ‐Stanford Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation

Transporters in Regulatory Science: Notable Contributions from Dr. Giacomini in the Past Two Decades

Transporters govern the access of molecules to cells or their exit from cells, thereby controlling the overall distribution of drugs to their intracellular site of action. Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions mediated by transporters are of increasing interest in drug development. Drug transporters, acting alone or in concert with drug metabolizing enzymes, can play an important role in modulating drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, thus affecting the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of a drug. Dr. Kathy Giacomini from the University of California, San Francisco is one of the world leaders in transporters and pharmacogenetics with key contributions to transporter science. Her contributions to transporter science are noteworthy. This review paper will summarize Dr. Giacomini's key contributions and influence on transporters in regulatory science in the past two decades. Regulatory science research highlighted in this review covers various aspects of transporter science including understanding the effect of renal impairment on transporters, transporter ontogeny, biomarkers for transporters, and interactions of excipients with transporters affecting drug absorption. Significance Statement This review paper highlights Dr. Giacomini's key contributions and influence on transporters in regulatory science in the past two decades. She has been at the cutting edge of science pertaining to drug transport, drug disposition, and regulatory science, leading to new era of translational sciences pertaining to drug disposition and transporter biology. Her research has and will continue to bring enormous impact on gaining new knowledge in guiding drug development and inspire scientists from all sectors in the field.

Conceptualising centres of excellence: a scoping review of global evidence

OBJECTIVE

Globally, interest in excellence has grown exponentially, with public and private institutions shifting their attention from meeting targets to achieving excellence. Centres of Excellence (CoEs) are standing at the forefront of healthcare, research and innovations responding to the world's most complex problems. However, their potential is hindered by conceptual ambiguity. We conducted a global synthesis of the evidence to conceptualise CoEs.

DESIGN

Scoping review, following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and methodological enhancement by Levac et al and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar and the Google engine until 1 January 2021.

ELIGIBILITY

Articles that describe CoE as the main theme.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 52 161 potential publications, with 78 articles met the eligibility criteria. The 78 articles were from 33 countries, of which 35 were from the USA, 3 each from Nigeria, South Africa, Spain and India, and 2 each from Ethiopia, Canada, Russia, Colombia, Sweden, Greece and Peru. The rest 17 were from various countries. The articles involved six thematic areas-healthcare, education, research, industry, information technology and general concepts on CoE. The analysis documented success stories of using the brand 'CoE'-an influential brand to stimulate best practices. We identified 12 essential foundations of CoE-specialised expertise; infrastructure; innovation; high-impact research; quality service; accreditation or standards; leadership; organisational structure; strategy; collaboration and partnership; sustainable funding or financial mechanisms; and entrepreneurship.

CONCLUSIONS

CoEs have significant scientific, political, economic and social impacts. However, there are inconsistent use and self-designation of the brand without approval by an independent, external process of evaluation and with high ambiguity between 'CoEs' and the ordinary 'institutions' or 'centres'. A comprehensive framework is needed to guide and inspire an institution as a CoE and to help government and funding institutions shape and oversee CoEs.

Regulation and Innovation: Role of Regulatory Science in Facilitating Pharmaceutical Innovation

Regulatory science is defined as science and research intended to inform decision making in a regulatory framework. This issue of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and the papers herein deal with the expansive topic of regulatory science and its role in fostering innovation and accelerating access to medicines. Regulatory health authorities, industry, and multiple stakeholders have a shared objective in advancing regulatory science to keep up with the ever-increasing pace of biomedical science.