Precision Dosing: The Clinical Pharmacology of Goldilocks

Beyond Population-Level Targets for Drug Concentrations: Precision Dosing Needs Individual-Level Targets that Include Superior Biomarkers of Drug Responses

The purpose of precision dosing is to increase the chances of therapeutic success in individual patients. This is achieved in practice by adjusting doses to reach precision dosing targets determined previously in relevant populations, ideally with robust supportive evidence showing improved clinical outcomes compared with standard dosing. But is this implicit assumption of translatable population-level precision dosing targets correct and the best for all patients? In this review, the types of precision dosing targets and how they are determined are outlined, problems with the translatability of these targets to individual patients are identified, and ways forward to address these challengers are proposed. Achieving improved clinical outcomes to support precision dosing over standard dosing is currently hampered by applying population-level targets to all patients. Just as "one-dose-fits-all" may be an inappropriate philosophy for drug treatment overall, a "one-target-fits-all" philosophy may limit the broad clinical benefits of precision dosing. Defining individual-level precision dosing targets may be needed for greatest therapeutic success. Superior future precision dosing targets will integrate several biomarkers that together account for the multiple sources of drug response variability.

Pharmacogenomics - a minor rather than major force in clinical medicine

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is touted as essential for the future of precision medicine. But the opportunity cost of PGx from the prescribers' perspective is rarely considered. The aim of this article is to critique PGx-guided prescribing using clinical pharmacology principles so that important cases for PGx testing are not missed by doctors responsible for therapeutic decision making.

AREAS COVERED

Three categories of PGx and their limitations are outlined - exposure PGx, response PGx, and immune-mediated safety PGx. Clinical pharmacology reasons are given for the narrow scope of PGx-guided prescribing apart from a few medical specialties. Clinical problems for doctors that may arise from PGx are then explained, including mismatch between patients' expectations of PGx testing and the benefits or answers it provides.

EXPERT OPINION

Contrary to popular opinion, PGx is unlikely to become the cornerstone of precision medicine. Sound clinical pharmacology reasons explain why PGx-guided prescribing is unnecessary for most drugs. Pharmacogenomics is important for niche areas of prescribing but has limited clinical utility more broadly. The opportunity cost of PGx-guided prescribing is currently too great for most doctors.

Effects of obesity on the pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors: current understanding and future implications for patient care and research

INTRODUCTION

In the United States, obesity affects approximately ⅖ adults and ⅕ children, leading to increased risk for comorbidities, like gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), treated increasingly with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Currently, there are no clinical guidelines to inform PPI dose selection for obesity, with sparse data regarding whether dose augmentation is necessary.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a review of available literature regarding the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and/or metabolism of PPIs in children and adults with obesity, as a step toward informing PPI dose selection.

EXPERT OPINION

Published PK data in adults and children are limited to first-generation PPIs and point toward reduced apparent oral drug clearance in obesity, with equipoise regarding obesity impact on drug absorption. Available PD data are sparse, conflicting, and limited to adults. No studies are available to inform the PPI PK→PD relationship in obesity and if/how it differs compared to individuals without obesity. In the absence of data, best practice may be to dose PPIs based on CYP2C19 genotype and lean body weight, so as to avoid systemic overexposure and potential toxicities, while monitoring closely for efficacy.

Identifying Dose Components of Manual Acupuncture to Determine the Dose-Response Relationship of Acupuncture Treatment: A Systematic Review

The dose-response relationship is a hallmark of pharmacological studies. However, this relationship has not been fully established in acupuncture research. This systematic review aims to provide the characteristics of the dose-response relationship in acupuncture research. We further summarized the differences in acupuncture effects according to dose components. Dose components of acupuncture were categorized into three groups: number of needles, stimulation intensity, and total number/frequency of treatments. The PubMed database was used to identify studies examining the effects of different doses of acupuncture from the establishment of the database to August 13, 2020. Dose components and responses were extracted from each study, and the results of low- and high-dose conditions were compared. Fourteen studies were included in this study. Of the included studies, 37.5% showed statistically significant enhanced responses to acupuncture treatment under high-dose conditions compared to low-dose conditions. Significant differences between high- and low-dose conditions were observed most frequently in studies that used various stimulation intensities (four out of six studies), followed in order by studies that used various numbers of needles (two out of seven studies), and those that used various numbers or frequencies of treatment (none of the three studies). Responses were categorized into symptom changes, physiological changes, experimentally induced pain/stimuli perception, and needling sensation. Stimulation intensity, which is considered one of the most important needling components, might indeed have a great impact on clinical responses to acupuncture.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Optimization of Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Challenges and Strategies

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are correlated with high mortality rates worldwide. Thus, the administration of antibiotic therapy with appropriate dosing regimen is critical. An efficient antibiotic is needed to maintain an adequate concentration at the infection site, for a sufficient period of time, to achieve the best therapeutic outcome. It can, however, be challenging for antibiotics to penetrate the pulmonary system due to the complexity of its structure. Crossing the blood alveolar barrier is a difficult process determined by multiple factors that are either drug related or infection related. Thus, the understanding of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of antibiotics identifies the optimum dosing regimens to achieve drug penetration into the epithelial lining fluid at adequate therapeutic concentrations. Critically ill patients in the ICU can express augmented renal clearance (ARC), characterized by enhanced renal function, or may have renal dysfunction necessitating supportive care such as continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Both ARC and CRRT can alter drug elimination, thus affecting drug concentrations. PK of critically ill patients is less clear due to the multiple variabilities associated with their condition. Therefore, conventional dosing regimens often lead to therapeutic failure. Another major hurdle faced in optimizing treatment for HAP/VAP is the reduction of the in vitro potency. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), if available, may allow health care providers to personalize treatment to maximize efficacy of the drug exposures while minimizing toxicity. TDM can be of significant importance in populations whom PK are less defined and for resistant infections to achieve the best therapeutic outcome.