Toward Replacement of Thorough QT Studies

The Impact of QT-Prolonging Medications and Drug-Drug Interactions on QTc Interval Prolongation in Hospitalized Patients: A Case-Crossover Study

Researchers have studied potential corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation from drug-drug interactions (DDIs), raising unresolved questions about their real-world impact. This retrospective case-crossover study investigated the effects of QT-prolonging drugs and DDIs on QTc prolongation in hospitalized patients aged 45 years and above. The cohort comprised patients who had multiple hospitalizations and developed QTc prolongation (QTc > 500 ms or an increase of >60 ms from baseline) at least 24 hours after admission between 2011 and 2019. Conditional logistic regression compared drug exposure between hospitalizations with QTc prolongation (case window) and those without (reference window). Among 2,276 patients (mean age 71; 43.8% female), the use of QT-prolonging drugs significantly increased the risk of QTc prolongation (odds ratio: 2.42 (95% confidence interval: 1.95-3.02)). The risk was higher with drugs of "known risks" (OR: 3.78 (2.91-4.90)) and "conditional risk" (OR: 2.08 (1.65-2.62)). DDIs, particularly involving multiple "known risk" drugs (OR: 7.86 (4.96-12.45)), strong cytochrome P450 enzyme inhibitors (OR: 5.57 (2.75-11.30)), or the concurrent use of ≥4 QT-prolonging drugs with any risk (OR: 5.28 (3.96-7.03)) substantially increased the risk. Cautious prescribing for patients with multiple risk factors is important to minimize the likelihood of QTc prolongation. However, when considering enhanced monitoring or drug choices, it is crucial to carefully evaluate the overall risk of QT prolongation against the benefits of treatment to ensure optimal patient care.

Improving the in Vivo QTc assay: The value of implementing best practices to support an integrated nonclinical-clinical QTc risk assessment and TQT substitute

Recent updates and modifications to the clinical ICH E14 and nonclinical ICH S7B guidelines, which both relate to the evaluation of drug-induced delayed repolarization risk, provide an opportunity for nonclinical in vivo electrocardiographic (ECG) data to directly influence clinical strategies, interpretation, regulatory decision-making and product labeling. This opportunity can be leveraged with more robust nonclinical in vivo QTc datasets based upon consensus standardized protocols and experimental best practices that reduce variability and optimize QTc signal detection, i.e., demonstrate assay sensitivity. The immediate opportunity for such nonclinical studies is when adequate clinical exposures (e.g., supratherapeutic) cannot be safely achieved, or other factors limit the robustness of the clinical QTc evaluation, e.g., the ICH E14 Q5.1 and Q6.1 scenarios. This position paper discusses the regulatory historical evolution and processes leading to this opportunity and details the expectations of future nonclinical in vivo QTc studies of new drug candidates. The conduct of in vivo QTc assays that are consistently designed, executed and analyzed will lead to confident interpretation, and increase their value for clinical QTc risk assessment. Lastly, this paper provides the rationale and basis for our companion article which describes technical details on in vivo QTc best practices and recommendations to achieve the goals of the new ICH E14/S7B Q&As, see Rossman et al., 2023 (this journal).

QTc Intervals Are Prolonged in Late Preterm and Term Neonates during Therapeutic Hypothermia but Normalize Afterwards

BACKGROUND

There are anecdotal reports on reversible QTc prolongation during therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for moderate to severe neonatal encephalopathy after asphyxia. As the QTc interval is a relevant biomarker for pharmacovigilance during medication development, a structured search and review on published neonatal QTc values to generate reference values is warranted to facilate medication development in this specific population.

METHODS

A structured search and literature assessment (PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar) with 'Newborn/Infant, QT and hypothermia' was conducted (October 2021). Retrieved individual values were converted to QTc (Bazett) over postnatal age (day 1-7).

RESULTS

We retrieved 94 QTc intervals (during TH (n = 50, until day 3) or subsequent normothermia (n = 44, day 4-7)) in 33 neonates from 6 publications. The median (range) of QTc intervals during TH was 508 (430-678), and 410 (317-540) ms afterwards (difference 98 ms, or +28 ms/°C decrease). Four additional cohorts (without individual QTc intervals) confirmed the pattern and magnitude of the effect of body temperature on the QTc interval.

CONCLUSIONS

We highlighted a relevant non-maturational covariate (°C dependent TH) and generated reference values for the QTc interval in this specific neonatal subpopulation. This knowledge on QTc during TH should be considered and integrated in neonatal medication development.