Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic-Led Guidance for Patients With Cystic Fibrosis Taking Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor With Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir for the Treatment of COVID-19

Evaluation of Complex Drug Interactions Between Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor and Statins Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling

Background/Objectives: The increasing use of statins in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) necessitates the investigation of potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) of statins with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, including elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI). The interactions may involve the potential inhibition of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes (CYPs), organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs), and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) by ETI. This presents a therapeutic challenge in CF due to the potential for elevated statin levels, consequently heightening the risk of myopathy. This study aimed to predict potential DDIs between statins and ETI using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach. Methods: We performed in vitro assays to measure the inhibitory potency of ETI against OATPs and CYP2C9 and incorporated these data into our PBPK models alongside published inhibitory parameters for BCRP and CYP3A4. Results: The PBPK simulation showed that atorvastatin had the highest predicted AUC ratio (3.27), followed by pravastatin (2.27), pitavastatin (2.24), and rosuvastatin (1.83). Conclusions: Based on these findings, rosuvastatin appears to exhibit a weak interaction with ETI, whereas other statins exhibited a moderate interaction, potentially requiring appropriate dose reductions. These data indicate potential clinically significant DDIs between ETI and certain statins, which warrants a clinical study to validate these findings.

The Pharmacokinetic Changes in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Population: Narrative Review

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a rare genetic disorder commonly affecting multiple organs such as the lungs, pancreas, liver, kidney, and intestine. Our search focuses on the pathophysiological changes that affect the drugs' absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME). This review aims to identify the ADME data that compares the pharmacokinetics (PK) of different drugs in CF and healthy subjects. The published data highlight multiple factors that affect absorption, such as the bile salt precipitation and the gastrointestinal pH. Changes in CF patients' protein binding and body composition affected the drug distribution. The paper also discusses the factors affecting metabolism and renal elimination, such as drug-protein binding and metabolizing enzyme capacity. The majority of CF patients are on multidrug therapy, which increases the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI). This is particularly true for those receiving the newly developed transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), as they are at a higher risk for CYP-related DDI. Our research highlights the importance of meticulously evaluating PK variations and DDIs in drug development and the therapeutic management of CF patients.

Investigation of cytochrome P450 inhibitory properties of deoxyshikonin, a bioactive compound from Lithospermum erythrorhizon Sieb. et Zucc

Deoxyshikonin, a natural naphthoquinone compound extracted from Lithospermum erythrorhizon Sieb. et Zucc (Boraginaceae), has a wide range of pharmacological activities, including anti-tumor, anti-bacterial and wound healing effects. However, the inhibitory effect of deoxyshikonin on cytochrome P450 (CYP) remains unclear. This study investigated the potential inhibitory effects of deoxyshikonin on CYP1A2, 2B1/6, 2C9/11, 2D1/6, 2E1 and 3A2/4 enzymes in human and rat liver microsomes (HLMs and RLMs) by the cocktail approach in vitro. The single-point inactivation experiment showed that deoxyshikonin presented no time-dependent inhibition on CYP activities in HLMs and RLMs. Enzyme inhibition kinetics indicated that in HLMs, deoxyshikonin was not only a competitive inhibitor of CYP1A2 and 2E1, but also a mixed inhibitor of CYP2B6, 2C9, 2D6 and 3A4, with Ki of 2.21, 1.78, 1.68, 0.20, 4.08 and 0.44 μM, respectively. In RLMs, deoxyshikonin not only competitively inhibited CYP2B1 and 2E1, but also exhibited mixed inhibition on CYP1A2, 2C11, 2D1 and 3A2, with Ki values of no more than 18.66 μM. In conclusion, due to the low Ki values of deoxythiokonin on CYP enzymes in HLMs, this may lead to drug-drug interactions (DDI) and potential toxicity.

Potentiation of BKCa channels by cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator correctors VX-445 and VX-121

Cystic fibrosis results from mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) anion channel, ultimately leading to diminished transepithelial anion secretion and mucociliary clearance. CFTR correctors are therapeutics that restore the folding/trafficking of mutated CFTR to the plasma membrane. The large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel (BKCa, KCa1.1) is also critical for maintaining lung airway surface liquid (ASL) volume. Here, we show that the class 2 (C2) CFTR corrector VX-445 (elexacaftor) induces K+ secretion across WT and F508del CFTR primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEs), which was entirely inhibited by the BKCa antagonist paxilline. Similar results were observed with VX-121, a corrector under clinical evaluation. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings verified that CFTR correctors potentiated BKCa activity from both primary HBEs and HEK cells stably expressing the α subunit (HEK-BK cells). Furthermore, excised patch-clamp recordings from HEK-BK cells verified direct action on the channel and demonstrated a significant increase in open probability. In mouse mesenteric artery, VX-445 induced a paxilline-sensitive vasorelaxation of preconstricted arteries. VX-445 also reduced firing frequency in primary rat hippocampal and cortical neurons. We raise the possibilities that C2 CFTR correctors gain additional clinical benefit by activation of BKCa in the lung yet may lead to adverse events through BKCa activation elsewhere.

Highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance (regulator) modulator therapy: shifting the curve for most while leaving some further behind

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traditional cystic fibrosis (CF) care had been focused on early intervention and symptom mitigation. With the advent of highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy (HEMT), in particular, the approval of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in 2019, there has been a dramatic improvement in outcomes in CF. The purpose of this article is to review the benefits, limitations, and impact of HEMT as well as discuss the new implications, challenges, and hope that modulators bring to people with CF (pwCF).

RECENT FINDINGS

HEMT has demonstrated sustained improvement in lung function, nutrition, quality of life, and survival for over 90% of pwCF. As HEMT has delivered such promise, there is a small but significant portion of pwCF who do not benefit from HEMT due to ineligible mutations, intolerance, or lack of accessibility to modulators.

SUMMARY

HEMT has significantly improved outcomes, but continued research is needed to understand the new challenges and implications the era of HEMT will bring, as well as how to provide equitable care to those who are unable to benefit from HEMT.

Modulator-refractory cystic fibrosis: Defining the scope and challenges of an emerging at-risk population

Cystic fibrosis (CF) causes life-shortening respiratory and systemic disease due to dysfunction of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride channel. Highly effective modulator therapies (HEMT) improve the lives of many people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) by correcting the structure and function of the defective CFTR channel at the molecular level. Despite these advancements, a subset of patients-termed modulator-refractory CF-continues to experience two or more pulmonary exacerbations per year requiring hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics, regardless of other modulator benefits. This underrecognized group represents an emerging challenge within the CF community. We discuss the benefits and limitations of current CFTR modulator therapies and the urgent need to investigate this emerging at-risk population. While HEMT improves lung function, decreases exacerbations, reduces the need for lung transplantation, and lowers mortality, increasing evidence shows that not all patients benefit equally. At the University of Virginia, nearly 6% of adults with CF exhibit the modulator-refractory phenotype. The driving factors of modulator-refractory CF are likely multifactorial, including genetic variations, variable immune responses, preexisting bronchiectasis, microbiological colonization, preexisting comorbid conditions, and environmental and socioeconomic factors. This perspective review recognizes and defines modulator-refractory CF as a distinct emerging clinical phenotype in the post-modulator era. Understanding this phenotype is crucial for reducing morbidity and mortality, and for improving the quality of life for PwCF. Raising awareness of modulator-refractory CF will help the community address this population and perform further research to identify causes. The emergence of modulator-refractory CF highlights a significant gap in our current treatment landscape and provides an opportunity to develop innovative therapeutic strategies that may benefit the entire CF community, ensuring that no person with CF is left behind.

Potential drug-drug interactions among U.S. adults treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: A cross-sectional study of the National Covid Cohort Collaborative (N3C)

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of potential moderate to severe drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, identify interacting medications, and evaluate risk factors associated with potential DDIs.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

DATA SOURCE

Electronic health records from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative Enclave, one of the largest COVID-19 data resources in the United States.

PATIENTS

Outpatients aged ≥18 years and started nirmatrelvir/ritonavir between December 23, 2021 and March 31, 2022.

INTERVENTION

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

MEASUREMENTS

The outcome is potential moderate to severe DDIs, defined as starting interacting medications reported by National Institutes of Health 30 days before or 10 days after starting nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 3214 outpatients who started nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, the mean age was 56.8 ± 17.1 years, 39.5% were male, and 65.8% were non-Hispanic white. Overall, 521 (16.2%) were potentially exposed to at least one moderate to severe DDI, most commonly to atorvastatin (19.2% of all DDIs), hydrocodone (14.0%), or oxycodone (14.0%). After adjustment for covariates, potential DDIs were more likely among individuals who were older (odds ratio [OR] 1.16 per 10-year increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.25), male (OR 1.36, CI 1.09-1.71), smokers (OR 1.38, CI 1.10-1.73), on more co-medications (OR 1.35, CI 1.31-1.39), and with a history of solid organ transplant (OR 3.63, CI 2.05-6.45).

CONCLUSIONS

One in six of individuals receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were at risk of a potential moderate or severe DDI, underscoring the importance of clinical and pharmacy systems to mitigate such risks.

Drug-drug interactions and dose management of BTK inhibitors when initiating nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (paxlovid) based on physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models

OBJECTIVE

Co-administration of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is challenging because of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). However, clinical trials specifically evaluating such DDIs are absent. To evaluate and quantify the DDIs between them and provide rational dose management strategies of BTK inhibitors, we conducted this study using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models.

METHODS

Physicochemical properties and pharmacokinetic parameters were acquired from the published literature and databases. The PBPK models were developed using Simcyp® software. These models were validated by comparing with published literature values. The successfully validated PBPK models were used to simulate the plasma concentration-time profiles and DDIs in a virtual healthy population receiving BTK inhibitors alone or with ritonavir.

RESULTS

Simulated plasma concentration-time profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters of each drug were in agreement with clinically observed values from literatures. Ritonavir increased ibrutinib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) 33- and 53.88-fold, respectively, increased zanubrutinib Cmax and AUC 2.57- and 3.18-fold, respectively, and increased acalabrutinib Cmax and AUC 3.85- and 6.54-fold, respectively. Based on our simulations, dose-adjustment strategies may consist of ibrutinib at 25 mg q48h, zanubrutinib at 80 mg twice-daily and acalabrutinib at 25 mg twice-daily with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBPK models predicted the in vivo pharmacokinetics and the DDIs of BTK inhibitors and ritonavir. The prospective simulations not only provided scientific evidence regarding rational dosing management strategies when initiating nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy but also provided a reference for the design of clinical DDIs study that may save resources and time.

SUMMARY

Paxlovid could increase Cmax and AUC0-τ of BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib), and dose adjustment strategy of ibrutinib (25 mg q48h), zanubrutinib (80 mg q12h) and acalabrutinib (25 mg q12h) should be considered when combination with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

Development and application of a PBPK modeling strategy to support antimalarial drug development

As part of a collaboration between Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), Certara UK and Monash University, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed for 20 antimalarials, using data obtained from standardized in vitro assays and clinical studies within the literature. The models have been applied within antimalarial drug development at MMV for more than 5 years. During this time, a strategy for their impactful use has evolved. All models are described in the supplementary material and are available to researchers. Case studies are also presented, demonstrating real-world development and clinical applications, including the assessment of the drug-drug interaction liability between combination partners or with co-administered drugs. This work emphasizes the benefit of PBPK modeling for antimalarial drug development and decision making, and presents a strategy to integrate it into the research and development process. It also provides a repository of shared information to benefit the global health research community.

Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict Drug-Drug Interactions between Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor and Tacrolimus in Lung Transplant Recipients

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) treatment has potential benefits in lung transplant recipients, including improvements in extrapulmonary manifestations, such as gastrointestinal and sinus disease; however, ivacaftor is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and may, therefore, pose a risk for elevated systemic exposure to tacrolimus. The aim of this investigation is to determine the impact of ETI on tacrolimus exposure and devise an appropriate dosing regimen to manage the risk of this drug-drug interaction (DDI). The CYP3A-mediated DDI of ivacaftor-tacrolimus was evaluated using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach, incorporating CYP3A4 inhibition parameters of ivacaftor and in vitro enzyme kinetic parameters of tacrolimus. To further support the findings in PBPK modeling, we present a case series of lung transplant patients who received both ETI and tacrolimus. We predicted a 2.36-fold increase in tacrolimus exposure when co-administered with ivacaftor, which would require a 50% dose reduction of tacrolimus upon initiation of ETI treatment to avoid the risk of elevated systemic exposure. Clinical cases (N = 13) indicate a median 32% (IQR: -14.30, 63.80) increase in the dose-normalized tacrolimus trough level (trough concentration/weight-normalized daily dose) after starting ETI. These results indicate that the concomitant administration of tacrolimus and ETI may lead to a clinically significant DDI, requiring the dose adjustment of tacrolimus.

Drug-drug interactions with CFTR modulator therapy in cystic fibrosis: Focus on Trikafta®/Kaftrio®

The combination of CFTR modulators ivacaftor, tezacaftor and elexacaftor (Trikafta®, Kaftrio®) significantly improve outcomes, including survival in a broad range of cystic fibrosis patients. These drugs have complicated metabolic profiles that make the potential for drug interactions an important consideration for prescribers, care providers and patients. Prolonged survival also increases risk of age-related disease and their associated pharmacotherapy, further increasing the risk of drug interactions and the need for increased vigilance amongst care providers. We systematically searched the literature for studies identifying and evaluating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions involving the components of Trikafta®/Kaftrio®. We also searched electronic databases of drugs for possible drug interactions based on metabolic profiles. We identified 86 potential drug interactions of which 13 were supported by 14 studies. There is a significant need for research to describe the likelihood, magnitude and clinical impact of the drug interactions proposed here.

Drug-drug interactions involving CFTR modulators: a review of the evidence and clinical implications

INTRODUCTION

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by mucus accumulation impairing the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and other organs. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators (ivacaftor, tezacaftor, elexacaftor, and lumacaftor) significantly improve lung function and nutritional status; however, they are substrates, inhibitors, and/or inducers of certain CYP enzymes and transporters, raising the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) with common CF medications.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted for DDIs involving CFTR modulators by reviewing new drug applications, drug package inserts, clinical studies, and validated databases of substrates, inhibitors, and inducers. Clinically, CYP3A inducers and inhibitors significantly decrease and increase systemic concentrations of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, respectively. Additionally, lumacaftor and ivacaftor alter concentrations of CYP3A and P-gp substrates. Potential DDIs without current clinical evidence include ivacaftor and elexacaftor's effect on CYP2C9 and OATP1B1/3 substrates, respectively, and OATP1B1/3 and P-gp inhibitors' effect on tezacaftor. A literature review was conducted using PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

Dosing recommendations for CFTR modulators with DDIs are relatively comprehensive; however, recommendations on timing of dosing transition of CFTR modulators when CYP3A inhibitors are initiated or discontinued is incomplete. Certain drug interactions may be managed by choosing an alternative treatment to avoid/minimize DDIs. Next generation CFTR modulator therapies under development are expected to provide increased activity with reduced DDI risk.

Safety of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor dose reduction: Mechanistic exploration through physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and a clinical case series

INTRODUCTION

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) treatment is associated with significant improvement in lung function in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF); however, some patients experience adverse effects (AEs) including hepatotoxicity. One potential strategy is dose reduction in ETI with the goal of maintaining therapeutic efficacy while resolving AEs. We report our experience of dose reduction in individuals who experienced AEs following ETI therapy. We provide mechanistic support for ETI dose reduction by exploring predicted lung exposures and underlying pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) relationships.

METHOD

Adults prescribed ETI who underwent dose reduction due to the AEs were included in this case series, and their percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV₁ ) and self-reported respiratory symptoms were collected. The full physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of ETI were developed incorporating physiological information and drug-dependent parameters. The models were validated against available pharmacokinetic and dose-response relationship data. The models were then used to predict lung concentrations of ETI at steady-state.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients underwent dose reduction in ETI due to AEs. Clinical stability without significant changes in ppFEV₁ after dose reduction was observed in all patients. Resolution or improvement of AEs occurred in 13 of the 15 cases. The model-predicted lung concentrations of reduced dose ETI exceeded the reported half maximal effective concentration (EC₅₀ ) from measurement of in vitro chloride transport, providing a hypothesis as to why therapeutic efficacy was maintained.

CONCLUSION

Albeit in a small number of patients, this study provides evidence that reduced ETI doses in pwCF who have experienced AEs may be effective. The PBPK models enable exploration of a mechanistic basis for this finding by simulating target tissue concentrations of ETI that can be compared with drug efficacy in vitro.

Understanding the Risk of Drug Interactions Between Ritonavir-Containing COVID-19 Therapies and Small-Molecule Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer

PURPOSE

The introduction of COVID-19 therapies containing ritonavir has markedly expanded the scope of use for this medicine. As a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor, the use of ritonavir is associated with a high drug interaction risk. There are currently no data to inform clinician regarding the likely magnitude and duration of interaction between ritonavir-containing COVID-19 therapies and small-molecule kinase inhibitors (KIs) in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to conduct virtual clinical trials with a parallel group study design in the presence and absence of ritonavir (100 mg twice daily for 5 days). The magnitude and time course of changes in KI exposure when coadministered with ritonavir was evaluated as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Dosing of ritonavir resulted in a > 2-fold increase in steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximal concentration for six of the 10 KIs. When the KI was coadministered with ritonavir, dose reductions to between 10% and 75% of the original dose were required to achieve an area under the plasma concentration-time curve within 1.25-fold of the value in the absence of ritonavir.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study provides the first data to assist clinicians' understanding of the drug interaction risk associated with administering ritonavir-containing COVID-19 therapies to patients with cancer who are currently being treated with KIs. These data may support clinicians to make more informed dosing decisions for patients with cancer undergoing treatment with KIs who require treatment with ritonavir-containing COVID-19 antiviral therapies.

Managing cystic fibrosis in children aged 6-11yrs: a critical review of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor combination therapy

INTRODUCTION

Cystic fibrosis is a life-limiting, autosomal recessive genetic disorder resulting in multi-organ disease due to CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein dysfunction. CF treatment previously focused on mitigation of disease signs and symptoms. The recent introduction of highly effective CFTR modulators, for which ~90% of people with CF are CFTR variant-eligible, has resulted in substantial health improvements.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we will describe the clinical trials leading to approval of the highly effective CFTR modulator, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), with a focus on the safety and efficacy of this treatment in children aged 6-11 years.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of ETI in variant-eligible children aged 6-11 is associated with marked clinical improvements with a favorable safety profile. We anticipate that introduction of ETI in early childhood may result in the prevention of pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and endocrine complications from CF, consequently leading to previously unimaginable gains in the quality and quantity of life. However, there is an urgent need to develop effective treatments for the remaining 10% of people with CF who are not eligible or unable to tolerate ETI treatment, and to increase access of ETI to more pwCF across the world.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling To Guide Management of Drug Interactions between Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor and Antibiotics for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are the pathogens of concern in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) due to their association with deterioration of lung function. Treatment requires the use of a multidrug combination regimen, creating the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-modulating therapies, including elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI), which are eliminated mainly through cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-mediated metabolism. An assessment of the DDI risk for ETI coadministered with NTM treatments, including rifabutin, clofazimine, and clarithromycin, is needed to provide appropriate guidance on dosing.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ivacaftor, Lumacaftor, Tezacaftor, and Elexacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis: Where Are We Now?

Drugs modulating the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, namely ivacaftor, lumacaftor, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor, are currently revolutionizing the management of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), particularly those with at least one F508del variant (up to 85% of patients). These “caftor” drugs are mainly metabolized by cytochromes P450 3A, whose enzymatic activity is influenced by environmental factors, and are sensitive to inhibition and induction. Hence, CFTR modulators are characterized by an important interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and are also prone to drug–drug interactions. However, these CFTR modulators are given at standardized dosages, while they meet all criteria for a formal therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program that should be considered in cases of clinical toxicity, less-than-expected clinical response, drug or food interactions, distinct patient subgroups (i.e., pediatrics), and for monitoring short-term adherence. While the information on CFTR drug exposure–clinical response relationships is still limited, we review the current evidence of the potential interest in the TDM of caftor drugs in real-life settings.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling-Guided Dose Management of Oral Anticoagulants when Initiating Paxlovid for COVID-19 Treatment

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) with cardiovascular diseases who are at higher risk of progressing to critical illness should be treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid). Ritonavir, the booster in nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, modulates multiple drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters, complicating its use in real‐world clinics. We aimed to apply physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to simulate the complex drug–drug interactions (DDIs) of ritonavir with two anticoagulants, rivaroxaban and racemic warfarin, to address this important clinical conundrum. Simulations were implemented within Simcyp Simulator. Compound and population models were adopted from Simcyp and our previous studies. Upon verification and validation of the PBPK model of ritonavir, prospective DDI simulations with the anticoagulants were performed in both the general population (20–65 years) and geriatric subjects (65–85 years) with or without moderate renal impairment. Elevated rivaroxaban concentrations were simulated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment, where the impact was more profound among geriatric subjects with renal impairment. The overexposure of rivaroxaban was restored to normal range on day 4 post‐discontinuation of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, corroborating with the recovery of enzyme activity. A lower 10 mg daily dose of rivaroxaban could effectively maintain acceptable systemic exposure of rivaroxaban during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment. Treatment of ritonavir marginally declined simulated S‐warfarin concentrations, but substantially elevated that of R‐warfarin, resulting in a decrease in the international normalized ratio (INR). As INR only recovered 2 weeks post‐nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment, a longer surveillance INR for warfarin becomes important. Our PBPK‐guided simulations evaluated clinically important yet untested DDIs and supports clinical studies to ensure proper anticoagulation management of patients with COVID‐19 with chronic coagulative abnormalities when initiating nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy.