Roadmap for understanding mechanisms on how Epstein-Barr virus triggers multiple sclerosis and for translating these discoveries in clinical trials

Targeting Epstein-Barr virus in multiple sclerosis: when and how?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Epidemiological evidence implicates Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) as the cause of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its biological role in the pathogenesis of MS is uncertain. The article provides an overview of the role of EBV in the pathogenesis of MS and makes a case for targeting EBV as a treatment strategy for MS.

RECENT FINDINGS

EBV potentially triggers autoimmunity via molecular mimicry or immune dysregulation. Another hypothesis, supported by immunological and virological data, indicates that active EBV infection via latent-lytic infection cycling within the central nervous system or periphery drives MS disease activity. This supports testing small molecule anti-EBV agents targeting both latent and lytic infection, central nervous system-penetrant B-cell therapies and EBV-targeted immunotherapies in MS. Immunotherapies may include EBV-specific cytotoxic or chimeric antigen receptors T-cells, therapeutic EBV vaccines and immune reconstitution therapies to boost endogenous EBV-targeted cytotoxic T-cell responses.

SUMMARY

EBV is the probable cause of MS and is likely to be driving MS disease activity via latent-lytic infection cycling. There is evidence that all licensed MS disease-modifying therapies target EBV, and there is a compelling case for testing other anti-EBV strategies as potential treatments for MS.

From progression to progress: The future of multiple sclerosis

Significant advances have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis in recent years yet challenges remain. The current classification of MS phenotypes according to disease activity and progression, for example, does not adequately reflect the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that may be acting in an individual with MS at different time points. Thus, there is a need for clinicians to transition to a management approach based on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that drive disability in MS. A Canadian expert panel convened in January 2023 to discuss priorities for clinical discovery and scientific exploration that would help advance the field. Five key areas of focus included: identifying a mechanism-based disease classification system; developing biomarkers (imaging, fluid, digital) to identify pathologic processes; implementing a data-driven approach to integrate genetic/environmental risk factors, clinical findings, imaging and biomarker data, and patient-reported outcomes to better characterize the many factors associated with disability progression; utilizing precision-based treatment strategies to target different disease processes; and potentially preventing disease through Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) vaccination, counselling about environmental risk factors (e.g. obesity, exercise, vitamin D/sun exposure, smoking) and other measures. Many of the tools needed to meet these needs are currently available. Further work is required to validate emerging biomarkers and tailor treatment strategies to the needs of individual patients. The hope is that a more complete view of the individual's pathobiology will enable clinicians to usher in an era of truly personalized medicine, in which more informed treatment decisions throughout the disease course achieve better long-term outcomes.

Do vaccines cause epilepsy? Review of cases in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

OBJECTIVE

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), a no-fault alternative to the traditional tort system. Since 1988, the total compensation paid exceeds $5 billion. Although epilepsy is one of the leading reasons for filing a claim, there has been no review of the process and validity of the legal outcomes given current medical information. The objectives were to review the evolution of the VICP program in regard to vaccine-related epilepsy and assess the rationale behind decisions made by the court.

METHODS

Publicly available cases involving epilepsy claims in the VICP were searched through Westlaw and the US Court of Federal Claims websites. All published reports were reviewed for petitioner's theories supporting vaccine-induced epilepsy, respondent's counterarguments, the final decision regarding compensation, and the rationale underlying these decisions. The primary goal was to determine which factors went into decisions regarding whether vaccines caused epilepsy.

RESULTS

Since the first epilepsy case in 1989, there have been many changes in the program, including the removal of residual seizure disorder as a vaccine-related injury, publication of the Althen prongs, release of the acellular form of pertussis, and recognition that in genetic conditions the underlying genetic abnormality rather than the immunization causes epilepsy. We identified 532 unique cases with epilepsy: 105 with infantile spasms and 427 with epilepsy without infantile spasms. The petitioners' experts often espoused outdated, erroneous causation theories that lacked an acceptable medical or scientific foundation and were frequently criticized by the court.

SIGNIFICANCE

Despite the lack of epidemiological or mechanistic evidence indicating that childhood vaccines covered by the VICP result in or aggravate epilepsy, these cases continue to be adjudicated. After 35 years of intense litigation, it is time to reconsider whether epilepsy should continue to be a compensable vaccine-induced injury.

Pathogenic role of autoantibodies at the ependyma in autoimmune disorders of the central nervous system

Ependymal cells make up the epithelial monolayer that lines the brain ventricles and the spinal cord central canal that are filled with cerebrospinal fluid. The ependyma has several functions, including regulating solute exchange between the cerebrospinal fluid and parenchyma, controlling microcirculation of cerebrospinal fluid via coordinated ciliary beating, and acting as a partial barrier. Dysregulation of these functions can lead to waste clearance impairment, cerebrospinal fluid accumulation, hydrocephalus, and more. A role for ependymal cells in a variety of neurological disorders has been proposed, including in neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis, two autoimmune demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system, where periventricular damage is common. What is not known is the mechanisms behind how ependymal cells become dysregulated in these diseases. In neuromyelitis optica, it is well established that autoantibodies directed against Aquaporin-4 are drivers of disease, and it has been shown recently that these autoantibodies can drive ependymal cell dysregulation. We propose a similar mechanism is at play in multiple sclerosis, where autoantibodies targeting a glial cell protein called GlialCAM on ependymal cells are contributing to disease. GlialCAM shares high molecular similarities with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) protein EBNA1. EBV has recently been shown to be necessary for multiple sclerosis initiation, yet how EBV mediates pathogenesis, especially in the periventricular area, remains elusive. In this perspective article, we discuss how ependymal cells could be targeted by antibody-related autoimmune mechanisms in autoimmune demyelinating diseases and how this is implicated in ventricular/periventricular pathology.