One or multiple samplings for flow cytometric DNA analyses in breast cancer-prognostic implications?

Intratumoral heterogeneity of immunohistochemical marker expression in breast carcinoma: a tissue microarray-based study

Core needle biopsies of breast carcinomas provide diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information before neoadjuvant therapy. Possible intratumoral heterogeneity of biomarker expression questions the validity of core needle biopsy interpretation in small biopsy specimens. Using tissue microarray (TMA) technology, we studied intratumoral heterogeneity of 7 immunomarkers. Five TMAs were constructed from 44 breast carcinomas and 5 normal breast tissues, each represented by 1-mm cores in triplicate from each of 3 foci. TMAs were immunostained for monoclonal estrogen receptor (ER), monoclonal progesterone receptor (PR), polyclonal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), monoclonal E-cadherin (E-cad), monoclonal epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), monoclonal p53, and monoclonal MIB-1. Expression was quantified visually by light microscopy and by image cytometry as intensity, percentage of cells positive, and score. Using intraclass correlation coefficient, heterogeneity in the expression of the immunomarkers within subjects was compared with the overall variance. Intratumoral heterogeneity was seen with 5 immunomarkers: ER, PR, HER2, p53, and MIB-1. E-cad and EGFR failed to show intratumoral heterogeneity. Intratumoral heterogeneity in ER, PR, HER2, p53, and MIB-1 indicates their problematic interpretation in small biopsy specimens as indicative of the status of the entire tumor. A negative result does not exclude the expression of these markers in the remainder of the tumor. E-cad (positive in ductal carcinomas) and EGFR lacked heterogeneity.

Intratumor heterogeneity of biomarker expression in breast carcinomas

Small biopsy samples are used increasingly to assess the biomarker expression for prognostic information and for monitoring therapeutic responses prior to and during neoadjuvant therapy. The issue of intratumor heterogeneity of expression of biomarkers, however, has raised questions about the validity of the assessment of biomarker expression based on limited tissue samples. We examined immunohistochemically the expression of HER-2neu (p185erbB-2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Bcl-2, p53, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in 30 breast carcinomas using archived, paraffin embedded tissue and determined the extent of intratumor heterogeneity. Each section was divided into four randomly oriented discrete regions, each containing a portion of the infiltrating carcinoma. For each tumor, the entire lesion and four regions were analyzed for the expression of these markers. Scores of both membrane and cytoplasmic staining of HER-2neu and EGFR, scores of cytoplasmic staining of Bcl-2, and scores of nuclear staining of both p53 and PCNA were recorded. The intensity of staining and the proportion of immunostained cells were determined. A semiquantitative immunoscore was calculated by determining the sum of the products of the intensity and corresponding proportion of stained tumor cells. We analyzed both invasive (IDC) and in situ (DCIS) carcinomas. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for paired comparisons between overall and regional immunoscores and between overall and regional percentages of stained cells. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess the level of agreement of overall biomarker expression with each of the regions. Generalized linear models were used to assess overall and pair-wise differences in the absolute values of percent changes between overall and regional expression of biomarkers. For IDCs, there were no statistically significant differences in the expression of the biomarkers in terms of either the percentage of cells staining or the immunoscores when comparing the entire tumor with each region except for the lower EGFR expression of arbitrarily selected region 1 and lower p53 expression of region 1 compared to that of the entire tumor section. For DCIS, there were no statistically significant differences in the expression of the biomarkers between the entire tumor and each region except in PCNA of region 2 compared to that of entire tumor section. Positive correlation of immunoscores was observed between the entire tumor and each region as well as across all four regions for IDC. Similar observations were noted with DCIS except for HER-2neu and PCNA. No statistically significant differences were observed in the absolute values of percent changes of biomarker expression between overall and the four regions for both DCIS and IDC. Therefore, no significant intratumor heterogeneity in the expression of HER-2neu, Bcl-2, and PCNA was observed in IDC. Minor regional variations were observed for EGFR and p53 in IDC. Similarly, no significant regional variation in the expression of markers was observed in DCIS except for PCNA.

Centrosomal aberrations in primary invasive breast cancer are associated with nodal status and hormone receptor expression

Our purpose was to assess the presence of centrosomal aberrations as measured by immunohistochemistry in primary invasive breast cancer and their association with established and proposed prognostic factors. Tissue sections of 103 primary invasive breast cancers were examined using centrosome-specific antibodies to pericentrin and gamma-tubulin. At least 3 different tumor regions per case were examined to determine maximum centrosomal aberration levels, which represent the proportion of cells with abnormal centrosomes in the region with the highest percentage of cells with centrosomal aberrations. The chi(2) test was performed to evaluate the association of maximum centrosomal aberration levels with patient age; tumor size; nodal status; nuclear grade; hormone receptor and Her2/neu expression; proportion of Ki67-, p53- and Bcl-2-positive tumor cells; DNA index; S-phase fraction; and proliferation index. With pericentrin immunohistochemistry, maximum centrosomal aberration levels >35% were detectable in 92 of the 103 breast carcinomas (89%). We found a highly significant correlation of maximum centrosomal aberration levels above 35% with axillary nodal tumor involvement (p < 0.0001) and the absence of hormone receptors (p < 0.0001). In addition, there was a borderline significant relationship with age <50 years (p = 0.050) and Her2/neu overexpression (p = 0.050). Among node-negative patients, maximum centrosomal aberration levels >35% were also associated with an increased DNA index (p = 0.006). In a subset of patients, additional staining of centrosomes with a monoclonal anti-gamma-tubulin antibody essentially confirmed these results. In primary invasive breast cancer, centrosomal aberrations are associated with those factors predicting a more aggressive course of disease. This might indicate a fundamental role of centrosomal dysfunction in disease evolution, possibly as a result of chromosome missegregation during mitosis.

S-phase fraction and breast cancer--a decade of experience

During the past decade, more than 300 articles, abstracts, and book chapters have been published about S-phase fraction (SPF) determined by DNA flow cytometry and its clinical utility for patients with breast cancer. However, the use of SPF for making treatment decisions for breast cancer patients remains controversial. After reviewing 273 published articles, we conclude: 1) Despite different techniques and cutpoints, correlations between SPF and other prognostic markers are relatively consistent across studies; higher SPF is generally associated with worse tumor grade, absence of steroid receptors, larger tumors, and positive axillary lymph nodes. 2) Higher SPF is generally associated with worse disease-free and overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses; SPF values from laboratories that have conducted validation studies can be used, in combination with other factors, to estimate the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. 3) There is considerable variability among laboratories regarding assay methodology, cell-cycle analysis techniques, and cutpoints for classifying and interpreting SPF; use of SPF values from different laboratories is problematic, and there remains a need for standardization of these processes and well-designed confirmation studies. We conclude that measurement of SPF does have clinical utility for patients with breast cancer, but standardization and quality control must be improved before it can be routinely used in community settings.

Complex karyotypes in flow cytometrically DNA-diploid squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

In squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), DNA ploidy as determined by flow cytometry (FCM) has been found to yield prognostic information but only for tumours at oral sites. Cytogenetic findings have indicated complex karyotype to be a correlate of poor clinical outcome. In the present study, 73 SCCHN were investigated with the two techniques. Aneuploid cell populations were identified in 49 (67%) cases by FCM but in only 21 (29%) cases by cytogenetic analysis. The chromosome index (CI), calculated as the mean chromosome number divided by 46, was compared with the respective DNA index (DI) obtained by FCM in 15 tumours, non-diploid according to both techniques, DI being systematically 12% higher than CI in this subgroup. Eight (33%) of the 24 tumours diploid according to FCM had complex karyotypes, three of the tumours being cytogenetically hypodiploid, three diploid and two non-diploid. The findings in the present study may partly explain the low prognostic value of ploidy status as assessed by FCM that has been observed in SCCHN. In addition, we conclude that FCM yields information of the genetic changes that is too unspecific, and that cytogenetic analysis shows a high rate of unsuccessful investigations, thus diminishing the value of the two methods as prognostic factors in SCCHN.

Intratumoral heterogeneity in primary breast carcinoma: study of concurrent parameters

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intratumoral heterogeneity for prognostic factors (ploidy, proliferation, hormone receptor positivity) has been demonstrated in primary breast carcinoma by both flow cytometric and image analysis methods. Previously, heterogeneity in tumors had been demonstrated for only singular parameters. Our objective, using maps of tumors in which discrete regions can be analyzed simultaneously for DNA index (DI) and proliferative activity, was to demonstrate heterogeneity with respect to two parameters and to determine whether any interparametric relationships existed.

METHODS

We analyzed 25 cases of archived, paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma (ductal) for Feulgen stain DNA analysis and MIB-1 immunohistochemistry using the CAS 200 Image Cytometer. For each tumor, four discrete regions were analyzed including tumor-host tissue interface sectors.

RESULTS

Of 25 cases, 19 (76%) were homogeneously diploid or near-diploid aneuploid, and 6 (24%) were heterogeneous. Within the heterogeneous group, all cases had at least one diploid and one or more aneuploid populations from separate discrete regions. Five of six DI heterogeneous tumors displayed diploid values for the overall measurements of the respective tumors, based on analysis of 200 or more nuclei. Eight of 25 cases (32%) showed significant measurable variation for MIB-1 proliferative activity in various sectors of tumor. All the MIB-1 heterogeneous tumors, with one exception, were homogeneously diploid.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that (1) heterogeneity is present with respect to DI and proliferative activity in breast carcinoma and is relatively common, (2) tumors homogeneous for one parameter may be heterogeneous for another, and (3) heterogeneity for proliferative activity is more common in homogeneously diploid tumors than in heterogeneous/aneuploid tumors.

Quantification of CCI-103F labeling heterogeneity in canine solid tumors

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to assess sources of variation in the distribution of nitroimidazole-labeled hypoxic cells in canine tumors and to quantify the reliability of estimating overall nitroimidazole-labeled area fraction from biopsies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Hypoxic cells were labeled in 24 canine tumors by immunostaining of the nitroimidazole hypoxia marker CCI-103F. In tumors with a volume < 100 cm3, each cubic centimeter of tumor was examined; in larger tumors 100 randomly selected 1 cm3 samples were examined. These data were used to estimate the overall CCI-103F-labeled area fraction in the tumor. A variance components model was used to quantify intertumoral, intratumoral, and within slide (residual) sources of variation. The ability to estimate intratumoral CCI-103F-labeled area fraction based on information obtained from biopsies was assessed by randomly selecting two or four samples from the dataset for each tumor and comparing the mean CCI-103F-labeled area fraction from this limited sample to the labeled area fraction based on each cubic centimeter; this simulation process was repeated 1000 times.

RESULTS

Intratumoral (27% of total) and intertumoral (30% of total) variation in CCI-103F-labeled area fraction were similar. Residual variation (variation at the microscopic level) accounted for 43% of total variation in CCI-103F labeling. Intratumoral variation in labeling decreased as the intratumoral CCI-103F mean labeled area fraction decreased. The accuracy of estimating the intratumoral CCI-103F-labeled area fraction in a tumor from limited sampling increased as the number of samples increased or the intratumoral labeled area fraction decreased. When four random samples were used to estimate overall CCI-103F-labeled area fraction in the tumor, estimates from approximately 90% of the 1000 simulations were within 0.10 of the intratumoral CCI-103F-labeled area fraction. Classifying a minimally labeled tumor as unlabeled based on limited sampling was unlikely.

CONCLUSION

Despite intratumor variation, acceptable estimates of nitroimidazole-labeled cells in a tumor may be obtained from a clinically feasible number of biopsies.

Tumour heterogeneity of DNA cell cycle variables in breast cancer measured by flow cytometry

AIM/BACKGROUND

Conflicting results have been reported concerning the prognostic value of DNA flow cytometric variables (DNA ploidy, DNA index, %S phase fraction) in breast cancer. Selection bias and differences in treatment may have contributed to these conflicting prognostic results. Differences in tissue processing, the number of nuclei measured, DNA histogram/cell cycle analysis, and intra-tumour heterogeneity may also have played a role. The aim of the present study was to assess intra-tumour heterogeneity of DNA flow cytometric variables in breast cancer.

METHODS

Fresh frozen specimens (n = 274) (0.3 x 0.3 x 0.3 cm) of 17 breast cancers and 167 slices, 50 microns thick, of 58 paraffin wax embedded blocks of 21 breast cancers were studied. All samples were prepared individually for DNA flow cytometry. DNA histograms were interpreted by semi-automated cell cycle analysis (MultiCycle) by two observers to avoid biased interpretation. An artificial averaged DNA histogram of each case was composed to simulate a sample prepared from whole tumour tissue.

RESULTS

With regard to DNA ploidy, classified as diploid or aneuploid, the fresh frozen and paraffin wax embedded breast cancers showed intra-tumour heterogeneity in 53% and 38% of cases, respectively. For fresh frozen and paraffin wax embedded material, respectively, six samples had to be measured to detect the highest DNA ploidy class in 71% and 86% of cases. Averaged DNA histograms showed a loss of DNA aneuploidy in 36% and 6% of fresh frozen and paraffin wax embedded samples, respectively. High intra-tumour heterogeneity (wide ranges) was found for the %S phase fraction. Average %S phase fraction and average aneuploid %S phase fraction had the widest ranges at 9.5-31.6% and 0.0-62.7%, respectively. There was no correlation between the number of stemlines and intra-tumour %S phase variability on the one hand and tumour size and grade on the other.

CONCLUSIONS

High intra-tumour heterogeneity for breast cancer was found for DNA ploidy, the DNA index and %S phase fraction as measured by flow cytometry, which may explain the conflicting prognostic results reported in the literature. To detect aneuploid cells, six samples may have to be prepared and measured separately. Measurement of these variables may be more reliable in paraffin wax sections because the thick slices provide a more representative sample. Prospective studies are required to determine whether the highest %S phase fraction value or the average value is more useful in the clinical context.

Heterogeneity in renal cell carcinoma and its impact no prognosis--a flow cytometric study

In the process of tumour progression genetic instability is the basis for the evolution of tumour cell clones with various genotypic and phenotypic characteristics causing heterogeneity. Renal cell carcinoma has a long prediagnostic growth period, which increases the probability of clonal evolution. We have studied 200 consecutive renal cell carcinomas, addressing the interrelationship between intratumour heterogeneity and clinicopathological factors. DNA ploidy patterns were analysed in multiple samples from each tumour using flow cytometry and compared with clinical stage, tumour invasion, metastatic rate and survival. Eighty-five of 192 evaluable tumours (44%) were homogeneous concerning DNA ploidy (62% diploid, 38% aneuploid). Among 107 heterogeneous tumours a majority (79%) contained aneuploid as well as diploid cell clones. Homogeneously diploid tumours had a lower incidence of local tumour spread compared with tumours with aneuploid cell clones (P < or = 0.001), but the frequency of distant metastasis at time of diagnosis was similar. The presence of aneuploidy in at least one sample from a tumour was a significant adverse prognostic factor (P < 0.001), whereas the degree of heterogeneity had no influence on survival. The frequent heterogeneity demonstrated indicates that multiple samples must be investigated to evaluate properly the malignant character of renal cell carcinoma.

Preoperative fine needle aspiration from human breast cancer is a valuable sampling material for progesterone receptor and cytometric DNA analysis

In a breast cancer series (n = 54), preoperative fine needle aspiration (FNA) was compared with biopsy at primary surgery as a source of material for the determination of progesterone receptor (PgR) content by enzyme immuno assay. The respective results manifested a strong correlation (r(s) = 0.82). The fact that PgR content was usually higher in FNA samples than in the corresponding biopsy samples and the finding that 11% of the tumours were PgR positive in FNA but PgR negative in the corresponding biopsy samples suggest a greater proportion of malignant cells to be obtained with FNA than in surgical biopsy. In another breast cancer series (n = 50), corresponding comparisons for DNA flow cytometry showed concordance in ploidy status (diploid vs. non-diploid) in 84% of cases and a strong correlation in S-phase fraction values (r(s) = 0.70). At DNA image cytometry, concordant results (Auer I + II vs. Auer III + IV) were obtained in 87% of the cases. To sum up, FNA seems to be a useful sampling technique for PgR determination and DNA cytometry.

Intratumoral heterogeneity of DNA ploidy in breast carcinomas: a flow cytometric assessment of sampling techniques

Intratumoral heterogeneity of DNA ploidy has been identified in breast carcinomas; however, optimal sampling methods have not been determined. In this study of 28 invasive breast carcinomas measuring more than 1.4 cm in greatest dimension, two different techniques for obtaining cells for flow cytometric DNA ploidy analysis were compared. Two solid pieces of tissue were taken from opposite halves of the tumor. A third sample was obtained by scraping multiple cut surfaces of the tumor. Heterogeneity of DNA ploidy was detected in 43% of cases. Most cases demonstrating heterogeneity contained multiple aneuploid populations. However, in five cases classification of the tumors as either DNA euploid or DNA aneuploid differed among samples. A total of 39 non-diploid populations were detected in 23 of the cases. Thirty-three (85%) were detected by scraping and 35 (90%) were detected in either one or both tissue pieces. Intratumoral DNA heterogeneity emphasizes the need for adequate sampling. The scraping technique was as effective in identifying aneuploid cell populations as the combined results of the two pieces of tissue and better than sampling a single piece of tissue. Scraping also offers the advantage of tissue conservation which may be critical when various analytic studies are performed.

DNA analysis of in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast via flow cytometry

Flow cytometric (FCM) DNA analysis of 41 clinical cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast was performed on fine-needle aspirates of unfixed, frozen tissue. Based on analysis of a single tissue sample, abnormal DNA content was found in 35 (85%) of the cases, and 15 (37%) disclosed heterogeneity. If five or more samples were analyzed, then heterogeneity was found in eight of ten cases. No conclusive correlation could be found between DNA index (DI) and histopathology. Our results on DCIS demonstrate a very high concordance with invasive breast cancer with respect to the frequency of DNA nondiploid cases, distribution of DI, occurrence of multiple clones, and S-phase fraction. This indicates that major genetic alterations and DNA heterogeneity are early events in carcinogenesis that are already established at the preinvasive stage.

Heterogeneity of the proliferative fraction and cyclin D1/CCND1 gene amplification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

High proliferative fraction and cyclin D1/CCND1 gene amplification have been associated with certain aggressive features of head and neck squamous carcinoma in some studies, but not in others. The differences may be related to the intratumoral heterogeneity of these factors. Moreover, the interrelationship between these seemingly related factors has not been determined. In order to determine the correlation between tumor proliferative fractions and CCND1 gene amplification, 3 spatially different samples from each of 32 primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) were separately analyzed by flow cytometry. A mixture of these specimens was also minced and snap frozen for molecular studies. DNA was extracted from patient lymphocytes, normal appearing squamous epithelium, and tumors. A genomic DNA probe containing the first exon of CCND1 was used for hybridization by Southern technique. A 5.6 kb genomic DNA probe of immunoglobulin heavy chain was used as an internal standard for quantification of CCND1 gene amplification. Our results showed that 30% of the tumor cases manifested intratumoral heterogeneity (> 50% differences) of their proliferative activity. The highest value was used for correlation with gene amplification. Eleven (34.4%) of the 32 tumors showed CCND1 amplification (2-10-fold). When the proliferative fraction was dichotomized into high and low groups based on the mean value (> or = 13%), a highly statistical correlation between CCND1 amplification and tumor proliferation was obtained (P < 0.001). No significant correlation between gene amplification and other clinicopathologic parameters was noted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reproducibility in DNA flow cytometric analysis of breast cancer: comparison of 12 laboratories' results for 67 sample homogenates

Flow cytometric (FCM) DNA analysis yields information on ploidy status and the S-phase fraction (SPF), variables of prognostic importance in breast cancer. The clinical value of the SPF is currently being evaluated in prospective randomized trials. The widespread use of FCM DNA analysis emphasizes the importance of reproducibility (both intra- and interlaboratory). In this study, 67 nuclear suspensions of breast cancer samples were analyzed by 12 laboratories routinely performing FCM DNA analysis in breast cancer. No general guidelines were imposed; each laboratory used its own standard protocols. For DNA ploidy status (diploid vs. non-diploid), agreement was complete for 79% (53/67) of the samples, compared with 64% (43/67) of samples when tetraploidy was considered [i.e., euploid (diploid+tetraploid) vs. aneuploid (the remaining non-diploid)]. For the SPF, pairwise comparison of the results of all 12 laboratories yielded a mean Spearman's rank correlation of 0.78 (range: 0.54-0.93). For those 39 samples being categorized in low or high SPF by all laboratories, all agreed in 14 samples (36%). Similar patterns were obtained with kappa measures, agreement being good for ploidy status (diploid vs. non-diploid; overall kappa = 0.87 and 0.74 for euploid vs. aneuploid), but moderate for the SPF [overall kappa = 0.47 (for low SPF vs. high SPF vs. "no SPF reported")]. Discrepancies were chiefly attributable to differences in the categorization of the S-phase values, rather than in FCM procedures, other critical differences being in the detection and interpretation of near-diploid and small non-diploid cell populations, the definition of tetraploidy, and the choice and execution of the method used for S-phase estimation. Based on the observations of this study, detailed guidelines for FCM analysis and interpretation of data are proposed in the Appendix. Some issues remain, however, e.g., to standardize a method for S-phase calculation and tetraploid definition.

Heterogeneity of intratumour proliferative activity in primary breast cancer: biological and clinical aspects

The present retrospective study was undertaken to verify whether the extent of intratumour proliferative activity variation or the method of quantifying tumour proliferative activity is related to biological characteristics and clinical outcome in a series of operable node-negative breast cancer patients. For tumour proliferative activity evaluation, the 3H-thymidine autoradiographic assay was used. After incubation of 3-8 samples from different areas of the equatorial section of each tumour for 1 h at 37 degrees C with 3H-thymidine, the following methods were used for evaluation of tumour cell labelling: mean tumour labelling index (LI), the highest labelling value from a specific area (LI-max), and the extent of intratumour labelling variation from several samples (LI-CV). LI-max was related to ER and PgR status, and linearly correlated with LI (c.c. = 0.92, P < 10(-6)) whereas LI-CV was independent of tumour size, grade ER and PgR status, but dependent on the number of tumour samples analysed for each tumour. After 5 years of median follow-up, disease-free survival was only related to tumour size (T1 versus T2: 84 versus 64%, P < 0.04 by log rank analysis) and different LI values (low versus high 3H-Tdr-LI:86 versus 61%, P < 0.03 by log rank analysis). LI-max and LI-CV values were not significantly related to clinical outcome. Cox multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic value of LI and tumour size on disease-free survival.

Progression and survival in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a comparison of clinical stage, Gleason grade, S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy

Clinical data were reviewed in 325 patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma followed up for a mean of 13 years. Paraffin-embedded tumour biopsy specimens from the primary tumours were available for flow cytometry (FCM) in 273 cases. Intra-tumour heterogeneity in DNA index (DI) was found in 4% of the tumours (54 cases were analysed). S-phase fraction (SPF) and DNA ploidy were significantly interrelated. Aneuploidy and high SPF were significantly related to both a high T category and high Gleason score. The progression in T1-2M0 tumours was related to Gleason score (P = 0.009), DNA ploidy (P = 0.006) and SPF (P = 0.007), while the Gleason score (P = 0.0013), DNA ploidy (P = 0.002) and SPF (P < 0.001) had prognostic value in univariate survival analysis. In the entire cohort, the T category (P < 0.001), M category (P < 0.001), Gleason score (P < 0.001), DNA ploidy (P < 0.001) and SPF (P < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors. In Cox's analysis, the M category (P < 0.001), Gleason score (P < 0.001), T category (P = 0.003), age (P = 0.001) and SPF (P = 0.087) were independently related to prognosis. In the T1-2M0 tumours, Gleason score (P < 0.001), T category (P = 0.022) and SPF (P = 0.058) were independent predictors. A novel classification system in which the DNA ploidy or SPF and the Gleason score were combined was found to be of significant prognostic value in all M0 tumours (P < 0.001). The results suggest that FCM can be used as an adjunct to conventional histological assessments for determination of the correct prognostic category in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Flow cytometric DNA ploidy and S-phase heterogeneity in advanced ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of flow cytometric DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) in ovarian cancer has been controversial. In the current study, the authors analyzed tumor heterogeneity in respect to DNA index DI and SPF.

METHODS

Flow cytometric variation in DI and SPF among representative fresh tumor material from the primary tumor, metastasis, and malignant effusions from the same patient was analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two samples from 47 patients were analyzed, and 119 samples from 42 patients were evaluable. Stable DI between different samples was found in 34 patients, whereas heterogeneity was found in 8 patients (19%). The metastases showed stable DNA content. The malignant effusion samples often lacked tumor cells. The representative ones were often DNA diploid. In 21% of the aneuploid samples, the SPF could not be analyzed. In 38% of the aneuploid samples, the stem line constituted less than 15% of measured nuclei. In these samples, a negative correlation between SPF and percentage of aneuploid cells was found, making SPF unreliable. Correct SPF measurement was thus possible in only 41% of the aneuploid samples, and in these tumors, SPF values varied considerably among different samples from the same patient, illustrated by a median SPF difference of 11% (range, 0-28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor DI heterogeneity existed in 19% of tumors. SPF depended on the amount of aneuploid cells in case of small stem lines and varied considerably, making its use as a prognostic factor doubtful. To ensure that all tumor stem lines are represented, at least two biopsy specimens from any solid tumor should be analyzed.

DNA Cytometry Consensus Conference. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the breast

This is the consensus statement regarding the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in breast cancer from the DNA Cytometry Consensus Conference held in Prout's Neck, Maine, USA, on October 1-4, 1992. Guidelines for clinical DNA cytometry generated at that meeting also appear in this issue of Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.